Ethical Principles Essay Examples - Free Research Paper Topics on StudyDriver.com

The Problems with Police Departments

When it comes to policing, there can be a bad stigma with the police departments and how they work. Police offices can often overstep laws and even break them. Many times, issues of police officers disobeying rules can be turned into worldwide problems. Abuse of power can be classified as excessive use of force, police shootings, and police corruption. Even though the majority of officers are good, the small percentage of corrupted officers can ruin the good image policing has. […]

Corruption of Criminal Justice System

Over the years, acts of corruption by the administrations in authority have for a long time shaken the public faith in government. However, the loss of public confidence is particularly acute when those involved are the police. Unfortunately, the police have acquired a dubious reputation. They have been accused of committing acts of corruption which might include abuse of authority, money laundering, concealing of criminals and also the violation of human rights (Corinthia, 85). As a result, such inhuman acts […]

To Kill a Mockingbird: Racial Tension in the Justice System

Did you know that “… one of every three black males born today will go to prison in his lifetime…” (Justice for All?). No matter what you think about the circumstances that leads up to the origin of this problem, “… it should be deeply disturbing to all Americans that these figures represent the future for a generation of children growing up today.” (Justice for All?). This is a major issue because one third of African Americans in this generation […]

Bryan A. Stevenson

A hero can be described as a person who is courageous enough to develop solutions, by demonstrating ingenuity and bravery when faced with challenges that at a time forces them to sacrifice their concerns for a greater cause. A hero helps other people and save them from danger, oppression, and/or misfortunes. It is during problems that heroism is manifested in individuals. Heroes are driven to act by something that is in them that push them even when they face challenges. […]

Military Bearing

In the United States Army, military bearing is the root in which every service member practices in order to carry out good discipline and ethics throughout ones military careers. The Three General Orders of a Soldier, The articles of UCMJ, as well as our own Sailors Creed illustrates how a military service member should conduct himself or herself on a daily basis, on and off duty. Dependability is a major aspect of military bearing. Without dependability, one can neither perform […]

Capital Punishment should be Abolished in Malaysia

Capital punishment is a death sentence awarded for capital offences where in the criminal provisions consider such persons as a gross danger or threats to the existence of the society. As the merge of human rights associations, this punishment is strictly opposed for its cruelty and this has been a global debate for some years. In Malaysia, this punishment is proudly held in the law and until today, executions are being held. It is a great shame as all members […]

What Justice Means to me

What Justice Means to Me Justice can mean something different to many people, but justice to me is doing my part to make sure that everyone is treated equally. In addition, justice is making sure that the right punishment is brought forth to the correct crime, and with any luck when a major crime is committed, then that the offender does not acquire liberty on a technicality. In today’s society people are afraid of the criminal justice system. Depending on […]

Should Murders be Executed?

Capital punishment is often the subject of controversy and it is certainly a tough topic. I oppose the death penalty in general, but i don’t think personally that people who support death penalty are totally wrong because we have to consider first the background culture from where we’re originally. The European countries for example, have recognised the human rights in 2000 and the majority of European people thought that death penalty is wrong. In my case i been also influenced […]

Does Virtue Ethics Offer a Convincing Account of what it is to be Right?

This essay shall discuss whether or not virtue ethics offers a convincing account of what it is to be morally right. It shall focus on Hursthouse’s version of virtue ethics, which shall be outlined first, and the positives of this argument: that it allows for different actions in different situations, and does not justify mass atrocities as a result. Four criticisms shall then be put against virtue ethics: that it is not action guiding; it does not explain cultural difference; […]

Legal Research Assessment

Question 1 – Could Vincent’s security staff be given power to issue fixed penalty notices for disorder? Issues What is a fixed pnd? Who legally can issue? How does this apply to these particular facts? Research Lexis Halsbury’s Laws of England – search “penalty notice for disorder” Result – 639 Directions as to Defendant’s good character – reference to Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 s2(1) Search Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 s2(1) – Part 1 deals with Provisions […]

The Law for Psychiatric Harm by Secondary Victims

Critically analyse the way the courts have developed and limited the law in relation to claims for psychiatric harm by secondary victims. Date authored: 18 th August, 2014. Introduction This paper will attempt to analyse the development of the law regulating the negligent infliction of psychiatric harm to secondary victims. This area of law is one filled with uncertainty due to the various limitations that have been introduced in an attempt to restrict an expansion of potential claims. The Law […]

Sexual Offences Act 2003

Critically evaluate the definition of consent for the purposes of sexual offences since the enactment of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, with particular regard to the presumptions in ss.75 and 76. Date authored: 15 th August, 2014. Described by the Home Office Review, Setting the Boundaries, as a ‘patchwork quilt of provisions’, the old law on sexual offences was a hodgepodge of archaic and discriminatory requirements. [1] Despite progressive changes by the court, the law on consent was in particularly […]

Law Example for Free

What is law? Law, in its widest sense, means and involves a uniformity of behavior, a constancy of happenings or a cause of events, rules of action, whether in the phenomena of nature or in the ways rational human beings. In its general sense law means an order of the universe, of events, of things or actions. In simple words, Law may be referred to as a body of rules that are determined and enforced by the state and that […]

The Rule of Law

RULE OF LAW The rule of law is defined as ‘the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.’[1] This is the principle that individuals and government can only act with publicly known law accordingly and those law must be enforced and adopted I a good manner and also consistent with the well established conventions, procedures and traditions. In the Australian Constitution, the […]

The Significance of Disability Anti-Discrimination Laws

DISABILITY ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS 1 There is a great deal of evidence that people are supporting anti-discrimination legislations in the United Kingdom. This evidence emanates from the support that comes from the trade unions, such as the trade union congress, and other organizations which aim at supporting the disabled people within the society. There is no way that denying equal opportunity to the disabled people can be morally justified[1]. This is against the principles of International Human Rights which advocate for […]

The Legal Age of Consent in Australia

The reasons to select the article and found legal issue The article reported Brief content of the article The 26-year-old accused went to Sydney last August with a student visa in order to develop his further study at the University of Newcastle. During that period, he met a 12-year-old girl at a local mosque, however, he did not concern that she was merely 12-years-old. Then, the accused and the girl got married in an Islamic wedding ceremony. After celebrating the […]

The Effects of the Land Registration Act

The system of land registration inaugurated by the Land Registration Act 1925 was a laudable and important step in simplifying the way title to land was recorded and conveyed. In time, however, significant defects began to emerge.” What were those defects and to what extent has the Land Registration Act 2002 provided a cure? Prior to the introduction of a system of land registration, the only way to establish a seller’s right to dispose of a property was from title […]

The England and Wales Court System, with Reference to Criminal and Civil Justice

Question 1 The court system in operation within England and Wales is well established in history this essay will particularly look at the Criminal and Civil Justice Systems.it will also address the advantages and disadvantages of the jury system. The court process in operation in England and Wales is steeped in history dating back centuries and the assembly used to debate and address deputes between it community members. The effectiveness of historical practice is evident in the judicial system of […]

The Evolution and Analysis of the Principle of Legitimate Expectation

I. Introduction “A man should keep his words. All the more so when promise is not a bare promise but is made with the intention that the other party should act upon it”[1] A law cannot be found upon mere trust and expectations, no matter how reasonable it may sound. For the individuals to act on the law, the law has to be concrete and defined. Therefore, laws are codified and precedents are established, to bring about the union of […]

Reforms on Voluntary Manslaughter Law as a Result of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

In this essay I will be discussing and also identifying the extent to which the coroners and justice act 2009 [1]reformed the law of voluntary manslaughter and the extent to which it succeeded in its aims. Voluntary manslaughter is less serious than murder, voluntary manslaughter is when the defendant has killed the victim with malice aforethought, malice aforethought defined by Coke [1612] is when one compassth to kill, wound or beat another and doth it fedato animo. The defendant has […]

The Freedom of Establishment

Since the founding of the European Union (EU) one of the main aims has been to create an internal market in order to promote development and economic growth and to offer its citizens an area of freedom, without internal frontiers, in which free movement of persons is ensured[1]. Amongst the basic fundamental freedoms which the TFEU concedes to EU citizens to reach the above mentioned aims is the freedom of establishment. Together with the other freedoms found in the TFEU […]

The Functions of Law

Functions of Law Table of Contents The Law Concept of Functions of Law Kinds of Law to Carry Different Functions Advantages of Law Functions of Law in different perspectives Contract law Functions of Contracts Indemnity Contract Indemnity Holder Guarantee Bailment Agency Bibliography The Law The law defines the principles people live in a society. Through which we have balance in not only our society but also in our lives. Law gives the indication of what is right by making that […]

The Independence of the Judiciary in Constitutional Law

In traditional constitutional theory, independence of the judiciary connoted independence from the political executive. It has presently discovering that a judge’s opportunity of activity can likewise be undermined by weights from his bosses inside the legal extension. Moreover, the test to legal autonomy from the religious foundation is not obscure. There is additionally the risk of weight or impelling from private, political and business focuses of force. Open trust in the uprightness, unbiased attitude and freedom of the legal is […]

The Charities Bill 2005

According to the Charities Bill 2005, s1, which was introduced into the House of Lords on 18 May 2005, the definition of a charity is ‘an institution which is established for charitable purposes only and falls to be subject to the control of the High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction with respect to charities.’ It goes on to list the a charitable purpose as being for the prevention or relief of poverty, the advancement of education, religion, health […]

The Computer Crime Act of Sri Lanka

Introduction Among the various types of crimes, Computer crime is a generic term which used to identify all crimes and frauds that are connected with or related to computers and information technology. Components of computer crimes could be divided into 3 categories as follows: Computer related crimes – use computers as tools for criminal activities Hacking offences – affect integrity, confidentiality of a computer system or network Content related cybercrimes – to distribute illegal data’s computers are used together with […]

The Concept of ‘Best Interest of Child’ in Sri Lanka

Family Law DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT ‘BEST INTEREST OF CHILD’ IN SRI LANKA Question: Evaluate the development of concept ‘Best Interest of Child’ in one of the following jurisdictions. South Africa. India. Sri Lanka. United Kingdom. CONTENT 1.Introduction 1.1The Child 2.Custody, Guardianship, and Parental Power 2.1Parental Power 2.2Custody and Guardianship 3.The Best Interests of the Child in Sri Lankan Context 3.1Concept 3.2Impediments 4.Conclusion DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT ‘BEST INTEREST OF CHILD’ IN SRI LANKA 1.Introduction This document will discuss the […]

The Concept of Contract in the Code Napoleon

THE CONCEPT OF CONTRACT IN THE CODE NAPOLEON Introduction and historical background leading to the formation of the Code Napoleon One of the biggest dilemmas that jurist over the course of history have faced is over the question of codification of law. One school of thought believes that the best and most just application of law can be achieved only when the principles that will finally be used for dispute resolution are enunciated beforehand. These principles can then be applied […]

Constitutional Safeguards of the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments to the US Constitution

Constitutional safeguards provided by US Constitution in the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments in regards to the criminal justice system are implemented to protect people against indiscriminate application of criminal laws and wanton treatment of persons suspected of violating the law. The amendments which are specifically designed to enforce constitutional rights of suspected criminals have had a significant impact in the criminal judicial sector. The workings of the courts in both juvenile and adult criminal proceedings and trials have been […]

The Doctrine of the Immunity of the Crown in the UK and India

INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES PROJECT ABSTRACT Statutes Affecting the Crown/State The general English rule is that the “king is above the law” and all statutes are meant for the subjects only and the crown is not bound by them. The rule of Common Law ‘Roy n’est lie per ascun statute, si il ne soit expressment nosme’ meaning the statutes neither control the crown nor the rights or properties of the crown, unless expressly or by necessity or by implication is named […]

Introduction to Statutory Interpretation

Statutory Interpretation Abstract: The means of interpreting the Acts of Parliament by judges is called statutory interpretation. Common Law: Is a law formulated by judges with the aid of conclusions of a court to follow the aid of a legislative process by the executive branch. The legal system of a common law states that, it is a partiality to handle likewise facts or matters distinctively on a distinctive occasions. Literal Rule: Is a rule that is frequently utilized by orthodox […]

Ethical Principles Essays