Jurisprudence Essay Examples - Free Research Paper Topics on StudyDriver.com

Jurisprudence on the Right of Ownership and Possession

Introduction The concept of ownership and possession is one of the fundamental juristic concepts common to all systems of law. This concept of ownership has been discussed by most of the writers before that of possession. However, it is not the right method. The idea of possession came first in the minds of people and it was later on that the idea of ownership came into existence. The idea of ownership and possession developed with the development of the civilization […]

Feminist Jurisprudence

class=”small”> In order to answer this question one must first assess and consider the theory of feminist jurisprudence. This will require an in-depth analysis of the theory and the principles of postmodernism. Further, in order to answer this question one must assess the principles that interpose themselves in law, namely the role of sex. Feminist jurisprudence can be said to be a theory that stands out from the classic theories that occupy the thoughts in jurisprudence. Feminism can be defined […]

Judicial Discretion and Jurisprudence

Moral questions impact the law at every corner. A rigid separation between morality, law, and discretion is implausible and, as Wacks defines it, “an improbable enterprise.” [1] In theory and in practice, the judiciary functions as the crux of the common law in Hong Kong. It is therefore in judicial discretion that the perception of law is segregated into two main schools of thought: legal naturalism and positivism. The naturalistic claim that the very essence of law is its morality […]

Roscoe Pound and Sociological Jurisprudence

INDEX Roscoe Pound – Introduction Social Engineering Interest Theory Jural Postulates Criticism Case Law Conclusion Bibliography Roscoe Pound – Introduction Roscoe Pound was one of the leading figures in twentieth-century legal thought. As a scholar, teacher, reformer, and dean of Harvard Law School, Pound strove to link law and society through his “sociological jurisprudence” and to improve the administration of the judicial system. In the early decades of the century, Pound was viewed as a radical thinker for arguing that […]

All about Forensic Science

Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, also known as the application of science to criminal and civil laws, mainly on the criminal side during criminal investigation, by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure. Forensic science collect, preserve, and analyze scientific evidence during the course of an investigation. While some scientists travel to the scene of the crime to collect the evidence themselves, others occupy a laboratory role, performing analysis on objects brought to them by other individuals. […]

The Utility of Computers in a Forensic Science

Forensic science has been available since the 7th century and is the ‘application of science to legal matters’ (Hopwood, Leiner, & Young, 2012). Inure the reality of forensic science has been circumference for a very long time, and it would presume that, it has elaborate and alter to aggrandized disillusioned with several privileges and possessions. Forensic science investigations proceed place utilizing forensic professionals as well as forensic scientists, crime labs, and criminalists. However, all ternate jobs inside the capacity of […]

A Natural Law View on Assisted Suicide

To the common person, the term natural law may not hold much significance or may register in their mind as a type of law that is of the earth or based on nature. While this may seem like the right definition, it is not the case. The idea of Natural law is one which has a very broad range of application and is generally misapplied when the term is incorporated in the topics of science, philosophy, history, theology, and law. […]

Introduction to Statutory Interpretation

Statutory Interpretation Abstract: The means of interpreting the Acts of Parliament by judges is called statutory interpretation. Common Law: Is a law formulated by judges with the aid of conclusions of a court to follow the aid of a legislative process by the executive branch. The legal system of a common law states that, it is a partiality to handle likewise facts or matters distinctively on a distinctive occasions. Literal Rule: Is a rule that is frequently utilized by orthodox […]

Right Answers and Hard Cases

In legal reasoning, the idea that a right answer can be found in hard cases is pure fiction. Discuss. Introduction It is often said that ‘hard cases make bad law’, but it is submitted by way of an opening observation that categorical statements regarding the law and its modus operandi are misleading at best and usually unreliable at the margins. The statement under review in the title to this work, in declaring that it is pure fiction that right answers […]

Is Legal Reasoning Different from Political Reasoning?

Theory of Law & Justice Assignment Question: Is legal reasoning essentially different from the reasoning of politicians? If not, why not? If it is essentially different, in what way is it different? Justify your answer by reference to the views of relevant legal theorists. Introduction It is noteworthy that the legal and political systems are fundamentally different in the first place due to the diverse perspectives of the world, and they have developed into two separate entities with their own […]

Law and Morality

“The ultimate basis for adhering to the positive thesis of the conceptual differentiation of law and morals is itself a moral reason. The point is to make sure that it is always open to the theorist and the ordinary person to retain a critical moral stance in face of the law which is.” (MacCormick). Introduction This discussion focuses on the relationship between law and morality and the conceptual differentiation of the two paradigms. It is appropriate to begin with a […]

Introduction to Negligence

Tort law Tort in general are a set of rights, obligation that are provided to the citizen by a civil court in order to maintain safety of people and provide remedies for persons who have been inflicted suffering/losses by the wrongdoings of other citizens. A tort is a wrongdoing by a citizen towards another for which he/she is tried in the court of law. The plaintiff is the person against whom the wrong has been committed and who has suffered […]

How do we Safeguard Human Rights?

‘Safeguarding Human Rights lies less in new laws, than in new interpretations’. Discuss with reference to the United States and the United Kingdom Introduction Both sides of the proposition posed in the title question are fraught with difficulty. Human history, particularly as it unfolded in the twentieth century, confirmed that national and supranational treaties and legislation, no matter how compellingly drafted or extensively ratified, was a thin safeguard against human rights abuses. Versailles, the Yalta Conference, the United Nations Declaration […]

Innominate Contracts

What were the innominate contracts? Where did they come from and why were they important? The very term innominate (literally without name) is potentially confusing since these so-called contracts are named very specifically. The term refers to their place in the system of classification of contracts in Roman Law rather than their possessing the characteristic of being unnamed. A distinct characteristic of Roman Law is that it might be said to possess a law of contracts as opposed to a […]

Contrast Liability in Tort

Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability Tort: A tort is a legal term which describes a civil wrong that can be redressed by awarding damages. The term describes violation where one person causes damage to other person. When there is a breach of duty of care done unintentionally, it causes tort of negligence. Accidents can be an example of Negligent Torts. When there is a breach of duty of care done intentionally to harm the other person it causes […]

Institutional Functions and Disparate Connotations

In contemporary political and legal beliefs, the term civil law indissolubly provides perplexing connotations. Many harbingers ostensibly understand the term civil law as a substantive area of law which preluded in the times of Ancient Rome. Conversely, individual’s familiar and residing in common law jurisdiction understand civil law to be a private area of law which is non-criminal. In this essay I will be analysing the terms civil law, their institutional functions, and their disparate connotations, before reaching a conclusion […]

Rights-based Struggles

Rights-based struggles have proved counterproductive in contexts of sexuality. The importance of rights, and more specifically, civil liberties, can be seen as the legal and political expression of our society. Philosophical notions of autonomy, self-fulfilment, and self expression, in terms of sexuality, have made privacy interests relevant to freedom of action and lifestyle, not merely to freedom from interference. [1] This essay focuses on rights and notions of ’liberty,’ in their most general sense, that being, non-interference by others with […]

A Problem Question on Tort Law

>Question 1 Yes, Barack is liable to Theo-Paul under the tort of negligence. The negligence part of tort law involves unintentional harm caused by one’s carelessness. Proving negligence entitles the injured plaintiff to being compensation for the injury to their body, property, emotions, financial status, intimate relationships or reputation. One must prove the resulting harmso as to succeed in a bid tobe compensated in a negligence case. The case of Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] lays the foundations of the fault […]

Jurisprudence Essays