Month: December 2022
A Literary Analysis of Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill and the One’s who Walk Away from Omelas by Ursula Le Guin
Through the course of this paper the author will try to demonstrate, depicting both sides of the argument, the reasons in which a follower of John Stuart Mill's "Utilitarianism" would disagree with the events taking place in Ursula Le Guin's "The One's Who Walk Away from Omelas."
"The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" (Mill 55). This is how Mill first presents the idea of Utilitarianism. If it promotes happiness it is right, if it promotes the reverse of happiness, then it is wrong. If one were to simply take this statement, without further reading, and then study Le Guin's "The One's Who Walk Away from Omelas", one would no doubt conclude that a follower of Mill would agree with the choice made by the people of Omelas. They chose to promote happiness for many, rather than choose happiness for one. This seems to be acceptable at first glance, but a further examination will show that this simply is not true.
It would be quite easy for one to read Mill's "Utilitarianism" and decide that Mill would agree with the people of Omelas' decision. For instance, Mill states on page 59 that "the observance of which an existence such as has been described might be, to the greatest extent possible, secured to all mankind; and not to them only, but, so far as the nature of things admits, to the whole sentient creation." Mill is saying here that Utility means to try and give happiness to all people, as many as possible, around the world. He states that the ultimate end would be "an existence exempt as far as possible from pain" (59). It would be simple to assume that Mill would believe the people of Omelas' decision to be perfectly moral. For Mill says that morals are grounded in the fact that pleasure and freedom from pain "are the only things desirable as ends" (Mill 55). The only thing people should strive for is happiness and pleasure; which is all the people of Omelas were doing. Unfortunately, when a deeper analysis is taken of Mill's "Utilitarianism", one may discover many statements contradictory to this belief.
Every one who has this moderate amount of moral and intellectual requisites is capable of an existence which may be called enviable; and unless such a person, through bad laws, or subjection to the will of others, is denied the liberty to use the sources of happiness within his reach, he will not fail to find this enviable existence (Mill 62).
This appears to describe the position that the young child who must suffer is in. The child is being subjected to the will of all others and therefore is being denied his/her own liberty to use the sources of happiness within his/her reach.
Mill now goes on to proclaim that "it is universally considered just that each person should obtain that (whether good or evil) which he deserves; and unjust that he should obtain a good, or be made to undergo an evil, which he does not deserve" (89). The child surely did nothing to deserve the torture that he/she is being put through. Consequently, it is unjust that the child should be made to "undergo an evil" which he/she did nothing to deserve. Emphasizing the above statement is the universal admission that it is "inconsistent with justice to be partial; to show favour or preference to one person over another" (Mill 90). This is once again affirming that no person can favor the rest of the population in Omelas over the young child merely because there are more people in the population than just one child.
Mill next makes the point, in relevance to the situation in Omelas, "do as one would be done by, and love one's neighbour as oneself" (64). Mill says that this alone constitutes the "ideal perfection of utilitarian morality" (64). If the people were doing to the child what they would want being done to themselves, then they would most definitely not be allowing the child to be tortured.
These past two points, however apparently sound, must be, in the end, negated. The basis for both the Golden Rule, and the "betraying a friend" points, is Utility. Both must be decided upon the greater good. While it would not be doing to the child as the people of Omelas would have done to themselves, it is doing for the people what the child would want to have done to himself.
The teachings of Mill on page 57 state that a highly endowed being would always find that any happiness he searched for would inevitably be imperfect. Yet this being has the ability to learn to bear its imperfections. If this were true, the people of Omelas would be able to bear the imperfections of the "normal" world they once lived in and, therefore, have no need to pursue the "perfect" happiness and pleasures. This thought is also backed by Mills statement that "the evils of the world are in themselves removable, and will, if human affairs continue to improve, be in the end reduced within narrow limits" (62). If this is the case, then there would be no reason, apart from laziness, to make this child suffer in order to reach almost the same end as may be acquired through time and determination. They would simply be taking the "easy road" to the final situation. Also, the statement made above that Utility "is an existence exempt as far as possible from pain" (59) would not hold true what the people of Omelas are doing. They believe that they are living in an existence free from pain, yet a child suffers a horrible fate full of mental and physical torture.
The most prominent and defining statement Mill makes in regards to Omelas is that "Utilitarianism, therefore, could only attain its end by the general cultivation of nobleness of character" (59, bold and italicization added). This shows that the only way Utilitarianism could be complete would be if the people's character were of a noble type. In the dictionary the word "noble" is defined as "Having or showing qualities of high moral character, such as courage, generosity, or honor." The people of Omelas do not seem to be of noble character according to this traditional definition. They are, on the other hand, being cruel to the child and not having any courage to step up and free this child, having the courage to face the pains and sufferings of the "normal" life. Accordingly, if being noble is the only true way of obtaining Utilitarianism, then the people of Omelas can not be considered to be living in a Utilitarian society.
Finally, due to the constant viewing and mass acceptance of the violence and torture being inflicted on the child, it is very plausible that the citizens of Omelas would eventually become so tolerant of violence that their version of the perfect world would allow violence, which would seemingly render the "perfect" city of Omelas in a flawed state.
Cite this page
A Literary Analysis of Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill and The One's Who Walk Away from Omelas by Ursula Le Guin. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Summary of the Story “The Ones who Walk Away from Omelas”
Societys vicious circle is installed into every activity, dialogue, and also expression. Every being has their area, whether that would certainly be the happy, faceless characters or the meager, dismal scapegoat. The short story of The Ones That Leave Omelas, gives insight on just how life is one unlimited cycle of anguish and also happiness. The title, itself, is significant due to the fact that it really feels unfinished hinting that any course can accrue to transform or continue the cycle.
In the last web pages of The Ones That Walk Away from Omelas, the author breaches the subject of the people who walk away. At first seen as cowards, they might truly be the saviors as well as change the fate of Omelas. The initial page of the story painted a stunning picture of a remarkable paradise. No illness or misery, simply satisfied, lively youngsters and also smiling grownups. The more they defined Omelas, however, the paint came to be clearer, revealing the much more damaged side of the community; the side that can be tranquil with abusing young, innocent youngsters (for their happiness). The expression The Ones Who Bow Out Omelas informs of minority that can not, as well as will certainly not, remain as well as let a kid endure for them however cant aid it, ether. These people did show up to have a higher function than simply running head first away from whats troubling them. As opposed to leaving, they can be strolling towards. They can be going for help, a person that can help them and the city of Omelas; perhaps even heading to a different location or area that on being is required to suffer for them. The title suggests that the physical closing of the story of The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas could not be the complete and also outright ending.
While a few of the The Ones Who Ignore Omelas, potentially, had hearts of pure gold, and also could have the underlining motivation to change the circumstance, the opportunity that some would have entrusted more egocentric intents are specific. While these types of individuals also do not feel alright with letting innocents endure for them, they are more probable leaving due to the fact that they angle feel happy or at ease learning about the youngster not since they wish to transform the reality that they remain in misery. These hold true cowards but even they are much better than the ones that in the story, have concerned accept the childs problem. If everybody left Omelas, self-seeking reasons or not, would certainly there be a need or reason for the kid to suffer?
The author told of communities individuals who were angry or dissatisfied with the youngsters scenario but have come to accept the reality that life is life, as well as the child simply got the short end of the stick. The title also drops light onto these people. When the writer picked to highlight the ones that walk away, it immediately reveals that picked the better path of both sorts of people.
The theme is finished by the titles implying which the one unlimited cycle of anguish and also happiness can be acted on (transformed), however has fallen short to be so far. In history, suffering of others has actually ended by the ones who objected, acted against, or bargained the trouble. The title gives the theme a brand-new side or facet. In Omelas, its not a stretch that in the whole background of Omelas, despite the horror tale (the fate of Omelas if the child is removed), that at some point some person will get sick of keeping quiet and also speak up for the child.
In the corrupted society where torments of numerous are compelled onto one, the style can be very one sided; continuously ignored, implying basically useless to anyone that doesn't trouble to lookbut it can be informative and also lost even more light onto a motif of a story. The title of The Ones That Bow Out Omelas, specifically, is very closely entangled up with the style of the tale. The motif is an accurate representation of the usual culture, even if the detailed situation is badly unreliable. Humans do have a tendency to make each other miserable for their own pleasure, or find happiness in other individuals griefs. The connections of misery and also joy are strong, and seem around each and every single edge also to the point where it is difficult to experience or observe anything, and also have everyone or everything at that point be all happy or all unfortunate. The title The Ones Who Bow Out Omelas feels highly un-finished. The vacant, indefinite feeling of the title gives insight on exactly how there is still a vacant, white web page after the end of the story. Absolutely, the title is extremely substantial to the motif, as well as the tale of The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas.
Cite this page
A Summary of the Story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas". (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Examination of the Ones who Walk Away from Omelas by Ursula K. Leguin
At times, in order for one to be delighted, one may in some cases base and also contrast their joy on the miseries of others. The Kid, in the tale "The Ones Who Ignore Omelas" by Ursula K. Leguin, is made use of as a substantial icon to efficiently produce emotional responses in the viewers mind, and is likewise utilized to criticise the participants these days's culture. Finally in the long run, the sign of the child relays a solid message to the reader, concerning the bases of ones happiness.
Throughout the whole tale, due to the efficient summary used, the author was able to captivate the readers emotions in various means. To begin, a child portrays photos of virtue, loveliness, as well as various other such beautified characteristics. A kid is a person, that as any other, has feelings as well as feelings. Nonetheless, in this narrative, the youngster was depicted as completely various.
" It is so slim there are no calves to its legs; its stubborn belly extends; it survives a half-bowl of corn dish and grease a day. It is naked. Its butts and also upper legs are a mass of festered sores, as it beings in its own waste matter consistently."
( Le Guin, p. 258).
Additionally, the reader likewise becomes aware of the dirty, unsanitary environments that the youngster is subjected to. (Le Guin, p. 259) After being given such a detailed description of the youngster, in addition to his/her setting, feelings of pity, and also disgust go into the visitors mind. In addition, when the viewers recognizes that it is because of this appalling child that the people of Omelas obtain their joy, and that the sole reason for this child's existence is only due to the fact that he/she is utilized as a sacrifice; the visitor after that begins to experience feelings of shock and sadness for the child. The kid is portrayed with the use of such vivid summary so that the visitor is able to really feel understanding in the direction of the kid, and also perhaps pertain to awareness of what society is like today.
In this story, the writer provides the viewers an idea of just how terrible as well as egocentric those in a culture can be when it involves their own fortunes. When the residents of Omelas see the child, some really feel pity, as well as some don't. "Typically the youngsters go home in rips, or in a tearless rage, when they have seen the youngster and also faced this horrible paradox." (Le Guin, p. 259) However, what do they do to place an end to this type of ruthlessness towards this child? Absolutely nothing. Sure they feel as though they would like to, however how many really do? The author appears to utilize the symbol of this youngster to make the readers, as members of society, familiarize concerns such as this, that are occurring frequently on the planet today. In the tale, it seems as though the people of Omelas are rejecting what the youngster is compelled to experience. Although they become aware of the conditions the kid undergoes, and also exactly how mistreated he/she is by the people of Omelas. (Le Guin, p. 258) they do not want to alter the scenario, for if they did, it would mean the discontinuation of their very own joy.
" If the child were raised into the sunlight out of that disgusting location, if it were.
cleaned as well as fed and comforted, that would be an advantage, certainly; but if it.
were done, because day as well as hr all the prosperity as well as elegance as well as pleasure of Omelas would certainly wither and be damaged.".
( Leguin, p. 259).
When checking out third world countries where sickness, malnutrition, forget and misuse are exposed around, there are many individuals who feel pity, however there is really little action taken to alter this. The writer uses the child in the story to signify the other kids on the planet that are mistreated as horribly as the youngster, based upon another person's expenditure.
Furthermore, there is a strong message given to the visitors. Although, the author appears as though she is lecturing, the viewers are not being lectured to. The viewers is given the surroundings of the youngster, and what the youngster goes through, and also are offered a selection: approve this therapy of the child, or walk away. (Le Guin, p. 260) Nevertheless, the writer also desires the viewers to see the paradox of the circumstance where the kid is necessary to the society, due to the fact that the writer is attempting to inform the reader that everyone needs something against which to contrast their existence. One has the ability to understand just how well off they are in their nation after making the contrast of the lives of individuals in various other countries. As foolish as it seems, the writer is trying to pass on the message, without others as a basis of comparison, just how does one step joy?
Finally, it is as a result of this symbolic kid that Le Guin has actually been able to reel in the reader mentally, in addition to make the visitor aware of the concerns happening in our society today. The author has actually also had the ability to successfully convey the message to the reader, the terrific unfortunate it is that in order for one to understand his/her blessings, they need to contrast it with those of the less privileged.
Cite this page
An Examination of The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas by Ursula K. Leguin. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of the Ones who Walk Away from Omelas
"The Ones That Leave Omelas" is an interesting short story by Ursula K. LeGuin which tells the tale of a small town with a dreadful trick. Le Guin, making use of an impressive strategy, has composed this story in such a way that it's analysis depends upon the viewers and not the message. It is the visitor's viewpoint in life and also the globe that shapes the image he views while reading this tale.
The people of Omelas are referred to as "they" while everybody that does not stay in Omelas is referred to as "we" to show that "they" are separate from "us". The writer does this very early in the tale to reveal the reader that the people in Omelas are not like the visitor. They are extremely different. Le Guin proceeds with this technique when she has fun with the minds of the readers by recommending concepts into the heads of the readers then quickly after that she withdraws these ideas. A terrific instance of this is when she recommends there is a King that is on a stallion as well as surrounded by knights, yet in the next line tells us that there is no King. This treatment has the visitor visualizing a picture then later on needing to dismiss this photo over and over again. This design is really smart because it maintains the viewers interested and presuming for the following hint.
Le Guin makes use of a line that makes one consider the means culture assumes. Le Guin states, "Just discomfort is intellectual, only evil fascinating"( 889 ). This declaration is extremely noticeable in society. When one watches the information he will certainly see all the terrible occasions that occurred in the world that day because we, as a culture, only discover dreadful occasions interesting. As an example, recently at the world trade facility battle there was a lot telecasted that it was difficult to find a terminal that was not covering the occasion. This was since we discovered this occasion of horror fascinating and also remarkable. We utilize pain and also horror worldwide to contrast to our lives to ensure that we might discover joy. Without finding some type of pain how could one ever find joy. We need pain to find joy in our lives, and all frequently we make use of other people's pain for our benefit. Often it seems as though society delights in to see others hurting due to the fact that they have the ability to value that it is not themselves in pain. The people utilize the sick youngster as an object to reflect upon. The youngster sits and suffers while the residents will check out him and never attempt to save him from this harsh life. Some might also state that the child is made use of to maintain wickedness from striking others in Omelas. It Omelas is so set apart from various other locations and also nobody speaks of the child who rests alone in the wardrobe, then who is informing the story? Also the ones who do bow out Omelas are stated to never ever mention the child. The only verdict that a person can get to is that the narrator should have once visited the community and also seen the boy himself. One can believe that the narrator might have been a site visitor who visited train to go to the reasonable that the city has. The storyteller does point out that some people do involve Omelas in this manner. The narrator must have hung around in Omelas to see the boy as well as discover how the townspeople believe as well as act. He knows just how the child is dealt with as well as maintained as well as also knows exactly how the people feel. This can only happen by a very first hand experience.
Why is the young boy kept alone in the storage room? There is no concrete evidence to address this inquiry, so I think that Le Guin leaves this open up to the viewers. One might think that the townspeople may be embarrassed that others might see him however the only time that visitors get in Omelas is for the fair. The young boy is locked up all year long, so, this should not be the reason. Perhaps the community is scared of the boy. If this were so, why do so lots of people see him on a regular basis. The factor which appears to make one of the most feeling is that he is right here for the goal of offering the city as an observation item. By having the young boy secured in conditions that are so horrible, specifically when he could be obtained and cleaned supports the concept that the boy is being given up so that others might observe his suffering, so they may discover happiness in their lives.
Why do people bow out Omelas? It is weird that these individuals leave Omelas without letting any individual know where they are going as well as why they are leaving. They leave in an issue that appears as if they are ranging from something since it is done without any planning. It appears that they are leaving from being dissatisfied or two disgruntled with the means life remains in Omelas. Possibly they can not take the hurt or sorrow they might have from enjoying one innocent kid endure for their joy or won advantages. They might have realized that their life is insufficient as long as they have an innocent, unwell youngster experiencing for their wellness.
Le Guin's story is so packed with information and wonder. She enables the viewers mind to stumble with so many possibilities in the tale. There are no hard facts in the story yet instead countless opportunities of interpretations that makes this story a pleasure to read and discuss with others.
Cite this page
An Analysis of the Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Comparison of the Lottery by Shirley Jackson and the Ones who Walk Away from Omelasa by Ursula K. Le Guin
The principle that it is easy to understand for a single person to endure for the advantage of others has actually been the subject of lots of books and also tales. Like åmå. The Lotteryala by Shirley Jackson where a setting up is made annual as well as a lottery game. Is attracted to select the villager that is going to get stoned to The Ones Who Leave. From Omelasään by Ursula K. Le Guin fatality by the various other. And where in order for the community of Omelas to live delighted as well as prosper a little boy has to live miserable secured a mop storage room. The same theme is utilized in both short stories, however the distinctions could quickly be clarified by checking out the authorâs lives, you have two individuals with 2 various backgrounds and also more than likely extremely dissimilar perspectives on social issues.
The cruelty of what occurs to each target of these tales varies incidentally the authors were treated themselves in their community. In The Lotto, the victim is stoned to fatality by neighbours and also individuals that know her without even recognizing the significance of all of it, just like the people in Jacksonas life rejecting her and calling her a witch and also denigrated her work because they didnållt understand it, she has seen a great deal of harshness and also she is extra able to reveal it in her work. In Omelas, People do refrain anything to the child and they all recognize why he has to stay where he is. It is still a distressing thought yet considering the seemingly kind- hearted as well as effectively liked Le Guin she couldnåt actually do anything worst to the child, she did not know how or merely really felt as well considerate towards him.
Although both authors have actually experienced different social lives; in both communities, people still accept the scapegoat, only small moral information split. At first of both stories every one of the occupants more than happy, in Omelas, you have a young boy playing some music, youngsters playing outside, in ämäThe Lottery game. You have children running around collecting rocks and speaking about institution. Everyone simply goes about their normal line of work, their usual jokes, while in Omelas they know the little child remains in the broom storage room not fed and also in bad condition and also in by
The Lottery they know that the end of the early morning one of their buddies or their relative is going to get stoned to fatality as well as in neither situation anyone does anything to help. In Omelas at least some people after in fact seeing what happens to the young boy leave and never returned while individuals from the lottery just remain in that town. Even the literary categories show an additional difference in between Jackson and Le Guin. In âlâ.
The Lottery?all the author chose to play a whole lot with foreshadowing to build thriller so you felt in one's bones initially that the story was mosting likely to be a dramatic one which remains in complete contrast to the fairytale like tone of The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelasåå. Also, Jackson picked the 3rd person purpose for her narrator which provides you a much more limited sight of the tale, like she does not want us close to the characters and also Le Guin opted for the first and 3rd person Omniscient which makes you feel linked in the tale like the narrator is close to you, speaking with you.
There are always mosting likely to be believers of the scapegoat benefits yet relying on just how you were raised, individuals you see as well as where you live, you are going to respond and believe in a different way concerning it like these two completely opposite authors and theirs personalities did.
Cite this page
A Comparison of the Lottery by Shirley Jackson and the Ones Who Walk Away from Omelasa by Ursula K. Le Guin. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of the Story the Ones who Walk Away from Omelas by Ursula LeGuin
True happiness is relative. Often people decide that certain achievements will bring them to be happy (such as money, family, and friends). However, sometimes the means by which people strive to achieve these goals are evil or immoral. This contradiction is depicted vividly in the story "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas" by Ursula LeGuin, in which one towns entire success is based on one boys suffering. Another prime example of the misguided motive is the story "Greasy Lake" by Tom Boyle, in which three bad boys come to terms with their unhealthy and destructive behavior. The two stories present very similar points, with slightly different lessons. While the people of both Omelas and Greasy Lake have misconceptions about their supposedly happy lives, they differ in that the bad boys of Greasy Lake learn why they need to change their behavior, while the people of Omelas are already aware and continue to accept the evil root of their happiness.
The life that the people of Omelas live is one of mindless happiness. Everything in their world is given to them, and no one suffers. No one has any problems. However, at the stem of the happiness is a tormented boy locked in a broom closet. Without his suffering, the towns contentment cannot continue. All of the people of Omelas are made aware that he is there, and they have to choose to live with that knowledge. Similarly, the boys of "Greasy Lake" are living a life that they think is happy. They think they are "bad", because they drink, do drugs, and get in fights. In both cases, they are merely ignoring the possible consequences of their actions because they are so intent on fulfilling their goals. They fail to realize that happiness can never be rooted with something degenerate. The difference between the two situations is that the people of Omelas arent doing bad things to themselves. They are letting someone else suffer for them, which makes it easier to blind themselves from what they are doing. They convince themselves that one persons misery is perfectly acceptable if it brings happiness to thousands. However, many people in the town still feel the underlying guilt. The boys of Greasy Lake, in contrast, are ruining their own lives. They engage in negative behavior, making bad decisions and doing stupid childish things to seem cool. However, not only are they getting hurt by their bad actions, but other people are affected as well. They fight a biker and almost beat him to death because of a minor argument, and then attempt to rape his girlfriend. They eventually realize that they have to come to terms with their own stupidity, and stop floundering. or they will destroy themselves by ending up in prison or dead. The people of Omelas have a moral obligation to stop the torture of someone else to end their own guilt.
In both of these stories, people are faced with the decision to change their situations. When the people of Omelas are old enough to understand, they see for themselves the tortured boy in the closet. They then have to choose whether or not to live with the knowledge of the childs torment. The boys of Greasy Lake can see that what they are doing to themselves is hurtful, but until one fateful night they dont care so they continue to live life as if they are invincible. Both groups would rather leave things the way they are so that they can take the easy road, rather than act responsiblly. However, each group does change significantly by the end of the stories. In the case of Omelas, some of the people who see the child feel guilty. Their sense of morality compels them to walk away from their mindlessly happy world. They do not believe it is right, but they wont take any action to fix the problem either. They remove themselves from the situation. The boys of Greasy Lake, on the other hand, are given a rude awakening as to how truly uncool they are, and begin to see the stupidity of their actions. They make the first stride to change by refusing to party with two girls they meet at the lake the night they fight and almost kill the biker. As they look upon the girls, they have a moment of self-realization and gain perspective. They begin to see how self-destructive their previous actions have been. Whether or not they continue to change for the better, they have at least begun the trek toward living a better life.
People every day are faced with choices, from things as simple as whether or not to take a shower, to things as controversial as whether or not to kill someone. We all have to choose our own personal path. The most important part of our decision is whether or not we see the truth behind which road we take. It is important to believe in what we do, and to realize whether the end, however good it may sound, really justifies the means by which we take to get there. This is what separates good from evil, and right from wrong. The people of Omelas arent necessarily evil, just like the boys in Greasy Lake arent necessarily stupid. But their decisions to continue to live in bad situations make them weak. Only those who choose to change the bad and move on to better things truly deserve the happiness they seek.
Cite this page
An Analysis of the Story The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas by Ursula LeGuin. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of Living out Omelas in Le Guin’s, the Ones who Walk Away from Omelas
In Le Guin s The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, we find ourselves faced with a moral dilemma. What is it that we as people base our happiness on? The idea of societal and personal happiness is played out through the analogy of Omelas and the abandoned child. In this story, we are drawn into Le Guin s world by use of her vivid descriptions.
Le Guin pulls us into Omelas with her first phrase with a clamor of bells that set the swallows soaring. From here she intricately weaves a pattern of plot and theme which she draws upon throughout the entire story. We are initially given to a blissful, almost jubilant, Omelas. We picture the houses with red roofs and painted walls, between old moss-grown gardens and under avenues of trees. We aren t given names or descriptions of these people, so that we may relate to them as the every person. Yet it comes to an end. Theme and plot collide into one sentence. The crux of Omelas. Le Guin asks if one can truly believe in Omelas. The reader finds himself/herself asking if the first part of the text is truly conceivable. The theme then takes over asking if one could accept the conditions that Omelas happily lives under. The plot then allows enough room for the reader to imagine the living conditions under which the child lives in with a little light seeping in dustily between cracks in the boards.
The characters, though not drawn out in much detail, have such personalities as to make them recognizable in our own lives. Le Guin utilizes broad terms such as the youths and girls, the merry women, old people and master workmen. By using general identities for these characters, we fill in the gaps with our own imagination molding them to fit people known in our lives. Even the child in the basement was only a child and the boys and girls ran around naked with mudstained feet and ankles. As much as she may shift to one character, Le Guin never gave more than a few vague details about that character s description. This was played and replayed throughout the story with great consistency.
Though it inhabitants may have been obscure and lightly characterized, Omelas itself held more detail than its people did. Omelas is depicted as a jubilant place of harmony and laughter. A fairy tale. Le Guin uses imaginative terms to allow the reader a gateway through which we gaze into the daily life of an Omelasn, a worry free life where the people went dancing and one can hear the great joyous clanging of the bells. Omelas is played out in a realistic way. The reader is meant to connect with the inhabitants of Omelas who are mature, passionate and intelligent. Le Guin dispels certain things in our modern era that give strain to some people s lives and woe to others. She refers to secret police, slavery and the bomb as negative thoughts outside of Omelas that do not exist in it.
Le Guin s descriptiveness and imagery allow this story to have a great effect on the reader. By wanting to live in Omelas and relating to its characters, the reader is forced to ask moral questions of herself/himself. Could one philosophically and humanly live with the strict conditions of happiness in Omelas? The reader is left to draw his/her own conclusion by referring to his/her own life experiences. Closing the book doesn t end the story. Some believe Omelas is here today.
Cite this page
An Analysis of Living Out Omelas in Le Guin's, The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Self-Reflection Essay about the Goals of Becoming a Computer Scientist for NASA
Given that the begin of secondary school, I have placed second in Regionals and also States in Public Speaking 1 for Future Service Leaders of America (FBLA). I was even certified to advance to FBLA Nationals in 2015. My innovation to Nationals last year opened the possibility to speak to the BCPS Board of Education at the Board of Education Satisfying in May 2013. In addition, I have placed second in Regionals for Service Presentation and also will certainly be advancing to States in April 2014. I have actually likewise maintained a 3.88 GPA for the past year. Additionally, I have actually still continued to be committed to plan occasions as well as volunteer for Trick Club.
This summer season, I wish to get a job, get more hrs on volunteer service, and perhaps take a college class. My other objectives in high school are to area (leading 10) in Nationals for FBLA in the future. I additionally want to obtain a 2400 or a rating extremely near to it on the SAT I. Additionally, I prepare to take the Math Degree 1 as well as Physics SAT II examinations and wish to get scores close to an 800. Furthermore, I want to get a 5 on the AP Globe History Examination and also 4's as well as 5's on my future AP tests. Also, I would like by the time I'm an elderly to bring my GPA to a 3.9.
Furthermore, I intend to be in National Honor Society and also to get a leadership placement for junior and also elderly year. In order to get to these objectives, I require to improve my weak areas of the SAT. I will do this by self-studying, taking a SAT Preparation course over the summer season, and also taking a SAT Preparation program for junior year. Likewise, in order to get right into National Honor Culture, I require to complete my needs as well as kip down my forms on time. Also, to get 4's and 5's on the AP examinations, I need to dedicate to examine sessions 3-4 times a week 3 months prior to the test.
In addition, I need to devote myself to my competitive occasion and my clubs in order to be positioned in FBLA Nationals and get a leadership placement. In addition to that, I will certainly finish my return to, complete job applications, sign up for college classes and dedicate myself to volunteer solution at institution to get a job, take college classes and enhance my volunteer hours. Finally, to raise my grade point average so as to get a 3.9, I have to continue to do my college work and try to get directly A's for the remainder of my high school occupation.
While in secondary school, I have a suitable of what my prepare for the future are. My preferred major for college would be Computer Science with a minor in Electrical Engineering. The place of the colleges that I'm seeking are not in the state of Maryland, yet ideally 4-6 hours far from home. As a visual aspect, I intend to be in college somewhere in the north eastern or southeast. The colleges that have actually contacted me and also I will preserve contact with, Fight it out College, Boston University, Northwestern University, and Rochester Institute of Modern Technology. In the summer season of junior and also elderly year, I will speak to other universities like Yale, Virginia Technology, and Brown College to arrange college sees. This year I have been entailed for social work within the college. I intend to volunteer at the Fashion Show, some Key-Club based tasks, as well as a task that I'm presently doing for my advice counselor. For social work outside of college, I will be offering for the Arts and Craft Celebration at the Hampton Plaza for the loss and spring and I may volunteer over the summer at the collection. I prepare this summer to obtain a work near the Towson area, ideally at Shake King, Barnes & Noble, or a store at the Towson Community Mall.
For referrals, I chose the adhering to teachers: Dr.Dissinger, Ms.Schweitzer, and also Mrs. Tazeelar-Ngo. I would certainly select these teachers because they have known me considering that 9th grade and also have seen my growth in English, IT, and also Mathematics. Starting in late February, I will prepare to examine for the AP Globe Background test to get a 5. This summer season, I will examine for the SAT by buying books and apps connected to the SAT, taking a SAT Prep Course over the summertime, and also taking a SAT Preparation Program over the academic year so as to get a 2400 or a score very near to it. Throughout junior year, I will certainly better examine scholarships for summer programs and college. I wish that in my junior year, I will have a management placement in FBLA that will manage the fundraising of the events. I prepare in the summer season of elderly year to take classes outside of secondary school. I intend to apply/go to the Brownish Pre-College Summer Programs, Yale at Expo, or the MIT Minority Introduction to Design & Scientific research, among others. I also plan to additionally go into public speaking competitions and stick with FBLA competitions entailing public speaking.Lastly, the summer of elderly year, I will certainly practice college essays to get an edge in the university application process.
Cite this page
A Self-Reflection Essay About the Goals of Becoming a Computer Scientist for NASA. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
Self-Reflection and Maturity in the Transformation of Celie in the Color Purple, a Novel by Alice Walker
The Shade Purple, by Alice Pedestrian narrates of a young girl named Celie. Guide is formatted as an journal so that day-to-day experiences can be shared through the voice of Celie. Initially, viewers discover that she resides in a life of persisting hardship, confusion, as well as chaos. Viewers also discover that she is unconfident, yet hopeful in finding a method to survive these hardships. However at the end of the novel, viewers see a transformation that would certainly call motivating. Some would certainly claim that what made her through this improvement is self representation and also maturation. Nonetheless, from what viewers can see it was because of the growing connections with Nettie, Mr, as well as Shug. As a result of them, Celie is able to have a sense of dependency with her sis, forgive individuals that injured her, as well as to love somebody else as well as herself.
In these entrances of her journal, readers can see a change from discussing Nettie to God to where she in fact has discussions with Nettie and also they discuss lots of points as they write to each other. Nevertheless one of the most compelling aspect of some of these conversations, is that visitors see how Celie has actually become more linked and more depending on Nettie. As an example, in the end of among her access she writes" Pray for me, Your Sister Celie", it reveals that she seeks Nettie's support as she is dealing with a misfortune, resemblance when she was looking advice from God (Pedestrian 3). This shift also shows that Celie who she thought needed to secure her sis from difficulty, has realized that she can not be solid regularly and also can now search for protection in her sis because Nettie ended up being her stamina.
Likewise in these access, viewers learn about what Mr feels concerning Celie. He clarifies to Celie, "I intended to kill you, stated Mr and also I did put you around a couple of times. I never understood just how you as well as Shug managed so well with each other and also it troubled the heck out of me. When she was mean and unpleasant to you, I understood. However when I took a look around as well as both of you was constantly doing each other's hair, I begin to stress." (Pedestrian 10). This quote gives light to Mr and also the his concerns of acceptance towards Celie not meeting up to his expectations of her. Due to this discussion, viewers see that Celie as well as Mr ____ are comparable in where they have concerns of approval. In Celie discovering this, she has actually said loudly that she does not despise him due to the fact that by saying that discussion, this has made him right into a person who she calls" when you speak with him currently he actually listen" (Walker 7). Therefore, this conversation with Mr. it has allow her to later on to forgive Mr ___ and also anybody else that has damaged her.
At first, viewers learn that Celie locates a photo of Shug Avery and she makes the goal to be as lovely as she is as well as locates herself embodying her in her marriage to Mr. As she is a lot older currently, viewers begin to see that Shug is with her and they a strong bond per other. In this quote "What I like finest spell Shug is what she been via, I say. When you look in shug's eyes you recognize she been where she been, seen what she seen, did what she did. And currently she know." it reveals that this connection is installed in comprehending each others struggle as well as coming back from it with a new set of lenses. Because of this, sees Shug as a strong, independent woman that she would certainly like herself to be. This bond later on showed Celie just how to enjoy someone else as well as potentially herself. In this quote" My work just to love her great and true myself ... I have love and I have been love and I give thanks to God let me acquire understanding enough to like can't be halted simply create some people's moan and groan ... I have love Shug Avery all my life" it sheds light on how via this connection it has actually made her realize that God aided her recognize that in order to love somebody and also herself, it must not be damaged due to not so good experiences (Walker 10).
Through out The Color Purple, readers see the growth of Celie from a young girl to a fully grown woman. They see that as a young girl, she was unconfident as well as she depended on God to assist herself and help her cope with her disturbing experiences, but can also see her resilience and also her devotion to things that mean the most to her. Currently as a mature woman, viewers additionally see that her change would certainly not have actually been as inspiring if it wasn't with the impacts of her connections with Nettie, Mrand Shug. Via Nettie's connection she has the ability to have talk to Nettie, which enabled Celie to be much more open with her sis and have reliance on her. When it comes to Mr's she has the ability to comprehend him a lot a lot more with their conversations, for that reason, teaching her acceptance for the people that have harmed her.
Lastly, Shug's relationship is focused on the love they have for each other, as a result, educates her just how to love another person and eventually enjoy herself through God's eyes. Finally, in any kind of change in life, individuals fall short to recognize that connections are vital to the overall advancement of a person. Whether these relationships are good ones or the poor ones, (poor ones in Celie's instance) it shows lessons that can not be instructed through self representation or maturity, yet lessons that can be taught with the partnerships of other people.
Cite this page
Self-Reflection and Maturity in the Transformation of Celie in The Color Purple, a Novel by Alice Walker. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
Self-Reflection on my Experience as a Writer in my English i Class
English I was greater than I anticipated. When you originate from middle school with all A's as well as the self-confidence that you will reach the celebrities, you would certainly assume that English I in senior high school would certainly be a wind. However I was wrong. It looked like a dream in the first couple of weeks of institution, once the first quarter ended, the documentation started accumulating. I would certainly have never ever foreseen the work and the sensation of failure that would come to pass. Every paper appeared like a brick wall, a standing challenge in between me and also my scholastic success. As each job ended up being progressively harder, I felt it more difficult to climb over these "walls," whether it be a basic reading concern or a critical evaluation paper. When you analyze the jobs that I consisted of in my portfolio, you will certainly observe that I have not been able to climb over all the "wall surfaces" that I ran into. However I have actually recognized that my success has actually always depended on my sensations on the task, the difficulty of the job available, and also my skills as a writer. My writing abilities seem to be premature, but the much more works I full, ideally my composing ablilites will expand. (If I may, I never really recognized just how to establish a thesis statement.).
My experience as a writer has grown quite a bit over this school year. I have actually never ever written an important evaluation paper, self-reflection, or various other papers that demanded much more reflection than a fundamental tale sypnosis. I have actually addressed critcal answer questions, yet not a whole paper. I really feel kind of absurd not having that kind of experience before going to English I. However as the final days of English I vanish, I can at least look back in some dark sense of success. I was presented to a broader selection of topics and also means to compose a paper. I restored in myself the standard fundamentals of creating, consisting of making certain links, being much less unclear, etc. A prime example of my experience at the start of English I would be my first typical analysis on my summertime analysis publication. Remarks reveal that I was ineffective at making specific links, and that my debate on the subject was simplistic. My experience as writer reveals a sign of growth in my essay for Pre-CAPT. Remarks show that I was a lot more throrough and extra details. Generally, my experience as an author over these ten months has actually improved my creating capacity, but honestly I have not made as much progression as I desired.
To tell you the truth, I really felt as if I haven't made much progression. Based upon all the "red-ink" on my documents-- the correction ink had not been necessisarily red; it's just an expression-- I don't seem like I made a great deal of, if any type of, progress. For example, on my paper on encountering hardship in I Know Why the Cage Bird Sings, the major remarks consisted of lost or a lack of supporting quotes, along with unclear material and also a poor verdict. In the future in the academic year when I wrote a paper on the duality of power in Pet Ranch, I still made the same blunders. I do not understand why I made the very same errors, and I'm not quite sure just how to fix them.
As you may recognize now, I had some difficulty in English I. The projects here and there were okay, however there was this job that particularly offered me trouble. The piece that was one of the most challenging was a paper on dealing with hardship on I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. It seemed very challenging to me because it was instead hard writing a paper that required me to believe critically concerning a publication I disliked as well as could not "penetrate." I found guide laborious and uneventful, without any violation to the writer, Maya Angelou. When I feel out-of-sync with the book I have to write about, it is tough ahead up with concepts. That was what made that item very tough.
My time in English I wasn't "a walk in the park," however there were some items that were really acceptable. My favored item was the Pre-CAPT Inquiry # 2. I enjoyed it greatly not as a result of the quality, however because it was straightforward. It demanded critical reasoning, but it balanced that facet with a straight answer. Generally, it was easy. It was most likely the most effective job I did all year. I must have had a terrific quantity of inspiration.
I've discovered a lot throughout this academic year and also in English I. I've made some enhancements, however I've recognized from my experiences as well as paper comments some locations I can improve. Most of the significant locations consist of making certain links, putting much better supporting quotations, and establishing solid conclusions. I somewhat enjoyed English I; and I recognize that if I place a lot more effort in my writing and fulfill theses locations of needed improvement, I will with any luck be successful as well as locate more enjoyment in English II than English I.
Cite this page
Self-Reflection on My Experience as a Writer in My English I Class. (2022, Dec 09).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of Communication in Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose
12 Angry men is a classic movie about the deliberation of a jury presiding over a murder trial where a son allegedly stabbed his father; the movie is also a great study about the habits of verbal and nonverbal communication. This paper will serve as an analysis of the jury's verbal and nonverbal communication and will explore how the jury member's relationships, perceptions, biased views, and methods of persuasion were used during the deliberation in rendering an outcome.
Diversity and Bias among the Jury Members
While the jury would not initially look like a diverse group, due to them all being middle to late aged white males, getting a more in depth look at each character shows that they are in fact, quite diverse. These men grew up in different socioeconomic backgrounds, and are still parts of a different social class; some are white collar workers, such as an architect, while others are blue collar workers, such as the watch maker and salesman. Most of the jury was around the same age, but there were a few older jurors who brought the wisdom of age.
Many of the jurors showed their biased views during the deliberation, right off from the start, juror 8 dismissed the idea that a kid of 18 years could commit such a crime, when in reality, the defendant's age should have nothing to do with it. Many of the jurors believe the slums are a breeding ground from criminal activity, pushing it to the point that it offends juror 5.
Additionally, juror 10 shows some bias towards race, making many racist remarks towards the defendant and using the term "them" in a derogatory way.
Relationships among the Jury
Each member of the jury plays a role, for example, jurors 3 and 10 are alpha male types, who like to be right and in charge, they serve as the main antagonist for the rest of the jury. Jurors 8 and 9 play the main protagonist, they are the most reasonable and level headed members of the jury. The remaining 8 jury member's relationships are directly tied to one of these groups; juror 6 and 7 get into an argument about respecting elders (juror 9), jurors 3 and 4 stay strong against juror 8's group until the very end. These relationships are one of the driving cause of communication barriers among the group.
Communication Barriers
The same diversity that gives the group a wide array of thought, also gives the group communication barriers to overcome. The alpha males of the group ignored the opinions of those they deemed weak, paying no attention to their good ideas; additionally, juror 7 does not take the judicial process seriously and seems rather bored with it all. Juror 8 finally gets fed up when a few of the other jury members are playing a game while he is speaking and puts an end to the jury members not taking it seriously. The hatred between the antagonist and protagonists serves as one of the biggest communication barriers, because the antagonist refuse to listen to any argument the protagonists give.
Non-verbal Communication
Some of the most intense moments were delivered through non-verbal communication; the movie made great use of silence, such as the awkward silence after juror 3 asks juror 9 "what would you know about it" in regards to be lonely, and the silence after juror 3 is baited into questioning whether the old witness could really be sure what he saw because he was "an old man". The two most powerful scenes in the movie were conveyed through non-verbal communication, first, when juror 8 slams the similar looking knife into the table, this was the first seed of doubt planted; secondly, when juror 9 catches juror 4 rubbing his nose, this was the last big argument that lead the group to a not guilty verdict; juror 4 was unaware that he was communicating this message, but juror 9 was able to receive the information regardless.
Persuasion and "I" Messages
The methods of persuasion used can be broken into two main categories, those used by the antagonists, mainly jurors 3 and 10, and those used by the protagonist, mainly juror 8. The burden of persuasion fell on juror 8, as the lone not guilty vote, he tried his best to use facts or logical reasoning that could disprove something taken as fact, for example, when he baited juror 3 into yelling out "I'll kill you"; additionally, he spoke to his peers as they were adults. This is in direct contrast to jurors 3 and 10, who use intimidation to get their messages through and treated everyone who disagreed like they were idiots. Juror 8 also used I messages quite well, making an effort to not seem like he was putting words in another juror's mouth, and using disclaimers, such as "I feel like".
Conclusion
The jury overcame diversity, biased opinions, and communication barriers in order to achieve their intended purpose, to render a fair verdict of the defendant in a murder case, which in this case was not guilty. I believe that all members of the jury were content with their decision, knowing that they did not send a potentially innocent man to his death, but I also believe some still think he may have been guilty, but reasonable doubt was present. Regardless of personal opinion on the matter, I believe all members of the jury were satisfied that the justice process had taken place, and had done so fairly.
References
- Unclemontie. (2011, Dec 31). 12 Angry Men Complete Movie [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RelOJfFlyp8
Cite this page
An Analysis of Communication in Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Personal Opinion on the Jurors Standing out in Twelve Angry Men, a Noir Thriller Film by Reginald Rose
Jury Duty is when you, a a citizen, along with 11 others, is called to decide whether or not someone is guilty. In 12 Angry Men, 12 very different personalities were called to decide on whether or not an 18 year old was considered guilty of killing his father. In order to dictate which jurors were more attractive to be around and which were not, I had to put myself in the predicament. There were several jurors that I was drawn to and several that I was not. The two jurors I was drawn included the Old man and the ghetto white boy. The jurors I was negatively drawn to included the loudmouth and the ballman.
Two jurors that caught my eye was the old man and the ghetto white boy. The old man caught my eye because he had a great sense of humor. Like when he said, "Maybe we can get him elected senator." I thought that was really funny. Maybe it was because it was so hot or maybe it was because he wanted to lighten the mood. But either way he lightened my mood and made me smile. I was also attracted to him because he was very honest and open to ideas. The other character that I was attracted to was the ghetto white boy for a number of reasons. A few being because he had alot of confidence and he believed in everything he was saying. I was not only attracted to them because of their personalities, but because I see myself in them. With the positivity and the confidence, but also being open to new ideas and so forth.
Two other jurors that caught my eye were The loudmouth and the Ballman. But they caught my eye in a negative way. The loudmouth states his opinion but he does is rudely. For example when he said, "You're letting him slip through our fingers." He doesn't know the boy yet he is so quick to say he is guilty. He was so quick to judge the boy based off of what he was given he didn't really take the time to hear him out. He does not care about how loud he's, hence his name " loudmouth". Another juror that caught my attention was the Ballman. He doesn't really care if the boy is guilty or not, he just wants to get out of there so he can go to his game. He voted what everyone else voted. I don't see myself in neither one of these jurors. The rudeness and disregard for others was so high with those two to a point where if I had to live with them i would run away and never come back.
The four jurors that stood out, two negative and two positive were very interesting. They stood out most of all out of the twelve. I enjoyed the movie. It was interesting to see everyone's point of view, I just wish it was in color.
Cite this page
A Personal Opinion on the Jurors Standing Out in Twelve Angry Men, a Noir Thriller Film by Reginald Rose. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of Biases in Twelve Angry Men, a Play by Reginald Rose
Twelve Angry Men
Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, is a story regarding twelve Jurors that have to decide regarding whether the nineteen-year-old boy standing test devoted the murder of his daddy. Each of these Juror's have various expectations, prejudices and sights of the evidence against the kid. If the kid will get the death sentence, their understanding of all of the evidence and votes will certainly affect. This tale highlights the many weaknesses in our justice system. The influence that personal biases/bigotry, personal experiences, an uninterest, andvariable witness testimonies has on the outcome in court is quite uneasy.
Individual predispositions together with acts of prejudice/bigotry are fairly destructive to simply outcomes in cases and also can cause a put up jury. A fantastic example of bigotry in the story is on web page fourteen, when Juror # 10 states, "They get drunk, they all have no look after human life and are terrible ..." This is a wonderful instance of a overgeneralization of a group of people as well as prejudice against the defendant. One more example is when Juror # 10 claims, "Bright! He's a common oblivious slob and also don't even speak excellent English." showing much more generalization against the accused. Oftentimes jurors can have unconscious or conscious prejudices versus an offender's race, sexuality among other things. In the story the offender's race is never pointed out, yet the boy's race might most definitely affect the juror's opinion of him. (At the time that this tale was written in 1954 the Mccarthy witch tests we happening and can've potentially affected Reginald Rose to consist of acts of bigotry as well as prejudice in his tale.).
Juror's very own point of views, biases, lack of ability to accomplish their duties and personal experiences are very significant to their outlook on a case. A Juror's very own clouded reasoning can influence their opinions to suit the outcome of an instance that they are wanting to see. Likewise, the Jurors history or religious beliefs can certainly influence their views of a defendant who has clashing ideas to their very own. Some jurors may also ignore important proof or information to validate their perspectives or prejudices towards an accused or a witness. An example of a juror that doesn't have the capacity to do their obligation in the court is, Juror # 2 that is conveniently guided by the other Jurors viewpoints. If a Juror has actually abused materials and also the accused is on trial for the use of these materials may been seen more favorably to the juror, an example of this is. On the whole, the majority of jurors have unconscious biases or absence of capacity to come to a fair verdict which can definitely negatively affect an instance or trigger a hung jury.
Witnesses can frequently be undependable resources of information or have hidden agendas to give a false testimony. In the story, much of the witnesses testimonies are wondered about by the jurors who have the ability to practically doubt the information provided to them to see if there is reasonable uncertainty. In court, what is stopping somebody from giving a false testimony? Not significantly. False or unethical testaments can definitely shift the instance against either the accused or complainant. Overall, witness testimonies can be fairly deceiving and also harmful to a reasonable result in court.
Juror's personal biases, lack of capacity for their obligation, bigotry and also false testimonies by witnesses are all problems that influence the results in court. Reginald likewise places lots of focus on, affordable question as it operates to safeguard the possibility of sending out an innocent young boy to fatality. On the whole the story of, "Twelve Angry Men reveals the toughness and weak points of our justice system from the enlightened juror # 8 to the bigoted Juror # 10. Finally, our justice system has many flaws that are highlighted in the tale of 12 Angry Men.
Cite this page
An Analysis of Biases in Twelve Angry Men, a Play by Reginald Rose. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Different Kinds of Heroes in the Plays “Death of a Salesman” and “12 Angry Men”
Different Kinds of Heroes
In the plays Death of a Salesman and 12 Angry Men, the writers highlight the leading character as a hero. At the starts of the plays, the reader or visitor does not realize that the men are turning into brave males.
Willy Loman, a tired old salesperson, lives an unrealistic life and locates hope in desires for the future. Part of his satisfaction is being a Loman; a pride that he hopes every one of the household will share. He can not delight in the present therefore he usually imagines memories of the past. He likes his work however his family members is more important to him. The salesman thinks that the key to success is to be suched as and to have an excellent character. Willy has always been a number with numerous faces; he should be a successful papa to the young boys, a supplier to Linda, as well as an excellent salesperson to himself.
By shedding his task, Willy realizes that he lives in illusions. The hurt guy loses his feeling of being a male. Homebuilding and giving for the family members belong of a guy duties, and also without a work, Willy can do neither. His life becomes useless to him.
Although he still really feels that he needs to offer his family members, he can no more do so from his work. The concept of suicide strikes him; he believes the cash from his insurance coverage will offer financial backing for his family members. The exhausted, optimistic male, who had visions of a great future for his kids, does not involve terms with fact. He retains his hopes as well as thinks that death is the only answer. Throughout the play, Willy can not confront reality. Regardless of this, individuals around him like his character. This generous act of giving away his life to assist his family reveals that he looks like a hero.
Comparing the two heroes, the viewers can identify that both men count on the virtue of young people. When his kid Biff has the world at his feet, Willy Loman lives for the day. He tries to help him by offering him recommendations. Biff will never achieve success yet his papa still counts on him. Juror number eight does not have any proof to confirm the virtue of the teen however he relies on him and also convinces the other members of the court to believe also.
Every hero requires a person for support. Juror number eight persuades juror number nine as well as this provides him the mental power to become a hero. Linda Loman as well as also the kids support the not successful sales person when he returns from his scenic tour around the nation. They give him the power to take place as well as attempt once more.
Both personalities show great courage and also stamina. Willy Loman wishes to victimize his life to support his family members with the life insurance. Juror number 8 defends the accused and disproves evidence. They are both heroes, yet juror number 8 assumes genuinely and locates the fact. Willy Loman sometimes understands the realities of his busted life yet he can decline it.
Heroes can represent several types such as a juror or a salesman. No one becomes a hero unless people identify his doing. Occasionally, as the visitor can identify in Death of a Salesman, it can be too late to tell someone that his doing is important and also good.
Cite this page
The Different Kinds of Heroes in the Plays "Death of a Salesman" and "12 Angry Men". (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose
The 12 Angry Men provides examples to show 4 stages of team dynamics. First stage of Group Dynamics is forming. In this phase, members do not have clear concept as well as are unsure regarding their duty and also duties. When 12 participants of jury got in the area to vote, they were unclear about their duties. Several of them intended to elect guilty, someone wished to discuss while some were actually not troubled as well as wished to leave as soon as possible. Team members did not know each other's viewpoints & reasons and also required instructions. One Juror took charge and asked others to elect on the issue. This was the developing stage.
As they began to vote, some members simply elected as they did not intend to go against others. Juror 8 voted against various other 11 individuals. During secret vote, someone changed his ballot. This led all the participants to suggest and staff member began fighting. Some members obtained individual as well as accused each other. There was lot of diversion as a result of individual commitments, psychological issues, and so on. This was the storming phase.
Juror 8 helped to focus on facts and also described the seriousness of the issue. Additionally, Juror 9 helps to bring some vital monitorings in the picture. This aids other members to review their reasoning and also people begin providing second thoughts to their ballot. Ultimately, more members understood the point of view of Juror 8 as well as group earned clear direction to get here as well as continue at consensus. This was the norming phase.
In the later stage, lots of people shared numerous point of views to assess the details for testaments as well as various other proofs. Nearly all the staff member were entirely focused regarding the situation and also group was determined to make a sensible choice. This was performing stage.
Impact of assumption on decision-making:
I could see many instances of Perception in this movie. For instance, Juror 3 was having tough time with his son. (His kid was young of similar age group as that of the accused kid.) So, he had an assumption that young generation, including the charged, did not regard elders. For this reason, Juror 3 was certain that the accused young boy had killed his daddy. Also, Juror 10 had perception that all people from slums can not be trusted as well as they might kill others extremely easily. I can see some instances of discerning perception too. Some members directed that the charged did not remember names of actors from the film but did not take into consideration the ambience where he was questioned after murder of his daddy. Additionally, some members repeatedly indicated the testament of old guy however overlooked his physical problem. Very same applies for the witness lady whose testimony was thought about extremely essential but truths regarding her social condition as well as eye-sight were ignored comfortably.
Decision-making traps:
I really feel decision trap is rational problem that can result in incorrect decision-making. Among the most vital decision catches was not to think about that there could be opposite to the story. 11 participants of the jury did not consider this as well as were ready with their decisions. As this was a team decision, 11 members were just ready to vote based on majority and leave quickly. As the employee were
held responsible as the group, people agreed to take exactly extreme stand simply to be with majority. I also really feel bulk of the employee did not recognize effect of their judgment failing and resulting right into fatality of an innocent male. I feel this problem arised from the truth that individuals were not going to get penalized individually in case their judgment would have been wrong. So, in case of quick yet incorrect decision, they were mosting likely to leave quickly without penalty. Yet, to make logical choice, they needed to review as well as invest more time and this sensible decision did not supply any kind of benefit.
Individuals were not prepared to believe the tale of the accused child, but they conveniently approved the stories of old male and also girl witness with no concerns. Individuals easily presumed that the child bought one one-of-a-kind rare blade as well as it was used for the murder. They did not consider that similar blade was offered on the market.
Also, some members repetitively mentioned that charged intimidated to eliminate his daddy, but they did rule out that it might have been an action taken in the fit of rage.
Influence of individual degree habits impacting group decision-making:
There are numerous instances of private actions affecting team decision-making. I feel Juror 8 was one of the most prominent team member. He was honest, logical and also committed to his duty as a jury participant. He risked to take different stand and stood against 11 members originally. He described his viewpoint effectively as well as encouraged other participant to change their decisions based upon facts. He possessed good leadership qualities as he did not buckle under pressure and also was self- encouraged. He comprehended repercussions of his actions quite possibly and saw the opportunity that the implicated might have been innocent. He took initiatives to look for the special blade and also offered it to support his debate. Juror 8 did not shed his mood and encouraged his group to remain concentrated. I feel Juror 8 presented several high qualities of an Inspired Leader such as principles, concern as well as mindfulness.
I really feel behavior of Juror 9 likewise created positive influence on team decision-making. He altered his mind in the secret voting as he agreed with the thinking of Juror 8. This changed track of the occasions and helped Juror 8 to offer his views. Juror 9 was additionally observant and pointed out realities about the witness girl which verified that she was not able to see the murder with accuracy. I also really feel willingness of Juror 5 to share his experiences regarding fights with knife helped the team to understand more of concerning relationship in between possible use of blade, elevation of assailant as well as injury on the upper body of dead man.
Actions of Juror 3 developed a solid negative influence on the team decision-making. He was behaving like a sadist and consistently obstructed the conversation. He was influenced by his personal connection with his boy and it blinded his activities, which in turn influenced team decision-making. He did not show regard towards disagreement as well as obtained terrible occasionally. I likewise feel Juror 7 had actually bought tickets to a video game as well as was in rush to leave the court to enjoy the video game. He constantly interrupted others and did not think practically. He did not recognize the extent of his actions.
Most of the jurors were willing to approve the logical arguments made by Juror 8 as well as therefore changed their opinions from "Guilty" to "Not Guilty". So, by changing their point of views, they aided the team to make the best decision inevitably.
Honest predicaments:
I really feel the largest moral problem was understood by Juror 8. The problem was whether to state the accused as Guilty without taking into consideration the opportunity that he could be innocent. Clearly concurring with various other court participants and also stating the charged as guilty presented a serious risk of penalizing an innocent with death penalty. This was the ethical dilemma which inspired Juror 8 to consider other aspects of the situation (not reviewed in the court earlier) as well as he convinced other jury participants to focus on unexpected truths as well as rational analysis. Juror 8 recognized the genuine significance of Jury's decision influencing life of a human being. Inevitably he handled to change their ballots from "Guilty" to "Not Guilty".
I saw two other principles of SOIL: empathy and mindfulness. Juror 8 was thoughtful in the direction of others. Juror 8 comprehended different elements involved in training of the accused. Additionally, Juror 8 was caring in the direction of other jury participants. He understood genuine problem of Juror 3. At the end, he aided Juror 3 to get his coat as he understood genuine pain of Juror 3. I additionally feel Juror 8 was mindful as he confirmed his factor that an individual can threaten to eliminates somebody in the fit of craze without in fact meaning it truly. Also, his mindfulness was presented as he looked for blade to verify his point. Juror 9 was additionally mindful as he very closely observed the witness woman within short time and made logical final thoughts.
In conclusion, this flick assisted me to understand several principles of Organizational Behavior in real life situation. Film's tag line claimed: "Life in their hands ... Death in their minds.!" Choice taken under flawed assumption, peer pressure as well as personal prejudice can cost life of an innocent. For this reason, choices ought to be taken by preventing such decision traps.
Cite this page
An Analysis of 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Overview of the Murder Trial in the Story “12 Angry Men”
Throughout the test of a man charged of his daddy's murder, a solitary juror takes a stand against the guilty verdict elected by the others as a result of their bias as well as assumptions. Therefore, it depends on the nerve of juror number eight to persuade the other participant of the committee to establish a right as well as reasonable outcome. Many of the skills we have learned in Business Communications were used to transform the vote of the other jurors.
Each of the jurors is depicted to have contradictory as well as different perspectives. Below is a short description of each of the individual jurors. Each of their details personalities caused the disputes and arrangements throughout the flick. Otherwise for each of their personalities, not only would we not have a film, but the last verdict of the motion picture would have been various.
Juror # 1 - a straightforward guy who plainly does not understand the complete complexity of the task that exists before him but is attempting to do everything not to allow anybody else locate this out. He shows up comfortable just once during the film - when he discusses football. He has the misfortune to be chosen supervisor of the jury - a job he plainly does not enjoy.
Juror # 2 - a small, quite male, plainly unaccustomed to offering his own opinion a lot less to anticipating his sights to be of any kind of significance. Obviously he locates solace in his work - he is an accounting professional.
Juror # 3 - possibly the most intricate personality in the movie. Starts like a pleasurable self-made effective business person, he analyses the situation impartially, clarifies his debates well and is sensibly self-assured. As time takes place he ends up being a growing number of enthusiastic and also appears to be somehow directly included with the situation. He additionally begins to reveal some indications of small psychological instability. Incredibly played by Lee J. Cobb - this is the personality you remember after the movie is over.
Juror # 4 - self guaranteed, somewhat big-headed stockbroker. Certainly considers himself extra smart than any individual else in the space, he comes close to the situation with cool unsympathetic reasoning yet (as one of the jurors says - "this is not a precise science") he does not think about the sensations, the enthusiasms, the characters of the people involved in the instance. He is conspicuous by the fact that he is the only juror that does not take his coat off (it is a really warm day).
Juror # 5 - right here is a man under excellent psychological stress. He originates from the exact same social background as the charged young boy - with who he practically unwillingly appears to relate to. Paradoxically this shows up one of the main factors for him electing guilty - he does not want compassion to affect him - so paradoxically it does.
Juror # 6 - a straightforward male, rather easily admitting that everybody in the room is better certified than he is to choose and also provide descriptions. However he actually wishes to see justice done as well as it stresses him that he may make a mistake.
Juror # 7 - the only one that truly has no viewpoint on this situation. Literally throughout the film his ideas are never on the instance - he talks of baseball, of the warmth, of fixing the follower but the only reason he has for electing this way or that is to speed things up a bit so he may be out of the jury space immediately. Not a wicked guy he just has no feeling of morality whatsoever - he can tell right from incorrect yet does not seem to believe it's worth the trouble.
Juror # 8- a caring guy, has actually placed a lot more believed into the instance than any of the other jurors. He attempts to do his best also despite apparently difficult odds.
Juror # 9 - a wise old man with his fantastic life experience has quite an unique means of checking out the case.
Juror # 10 - one of the most horrible personality in the movie. Due to the fact that of the boy's social history, ballots guilty as well as does not also try to conceal the truth that he does so just. The misfortune comes from the truth that his very own social position is just a cut over the kid's - that makes him all the more excited to emphasize the distinction.
Juror # 11 - an immigrant watch manufacturer, careful systematic male, well mannered and soft talked. respects the right of individuals to have various opinion to his - and agrees to take a look at both sides of the problem. Sheds his mood only once - alarmed by the total indifference of juror # 7.
Juror # 12 - a young service type - probably he has his very own viewpoints - but is careful to conceal them. What he has learnt out of life seems to be that knowledge is equal with agreeing with what the majority of individuals think.
At first of the flick, each of the jurors cast their ballot on preconceived notions. Nevertheless, it is with the caring judgment of juror 8 that makes everybody else reassess their ballots. He presents his perspective in a calm, clear, concise way that offers reason as well as thought. Unlike all the various other jurors, he does not judge the young boy strictly by what seems obvious. He makes the effort to figure out the intentions, and also other possibilities. He offers different perspectives that none of the various other jurors ever considered. His greatest challenge was to overcome such strong presumptions the various other jurors had actually made. It was very difficult to break through the bias as well as presumptions that many individuals had actually highly set in their minds.
There were several aspects that made reaching the agreement difficult. As stated over, getting rid of bias as well as assumptions were one of the many barriers. An additional aspect being that the biased proof offered in the court was so convincing. Facing many individuals with comparable views was needed as well as difficult courage. The truth that most of the jurors intended to go house as well as not put in the time to talk about the instance was one more trouble. Individuals seemed much more worried concerning their individual lives than the life of this young boy. All these barriers made swaying the choice of the team exceptionally difficult.
The type of individuals require to reach a consensus are those that are open minded. Individuals who are not afraid to alter their viewpoint and also bargain will certainly be able to decide. Stubborn, obstinate individuals will stand to their initial idea regardless if the decision is appropriate. Many people will prevent making the decisions by arguing, insulting, denying, withdrawing, interrupting, as well as also having a sense of humor to hinder the subjects. These attributes can all result in a conference where the final decision is difficult in conclusion.
If the group had determined to take a vote a lot of the jurors views would not have actually presented their real sensations. They would merely accompany the various other juror s point of views in fear they would get made at a vote different kind theirs. I believe that all the talking and also negotiating was important since it present various viewpoints that had not previously been thought about. Although the voting would have been much quicker, it would not have actually been a fair assessment and also final thought for the suspect. Time and effort was taken into the decision, as well as thus the right choice was made.
Cite this page
An Overview of the Murder Trial in the Story "12 Angry Men". (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Presence of Stress in 12 Angry Men and what Caused it
The Presence of Stress in 12 Angry Men And What Caused It
All human beings encounter stress at one point or another in their life. Stress can trigger other emotions that do not necessarily help one in their current situation. Dealing with it can also cause more problems, perhaps even more stress. In the movie 12 Angry Men, 12 jurors are placed in a small, sultry room where they have to come up with a unanimous verdict. After hours of contemplation the men emerge sweaty, stressed out, emotionally drained, and tired from dealing with the stress of the situation. The stress that they felt was a normal reactive response to be present after being put in that situation.
The jurors knew that they had an important job to do. Their decision could save or take the life of a man. The situation is an approach-avoidance situation because they could save the life of an innocent man or they could let a guilty man go depending on the decision, which led to the initial stress. For a long amount of time, Juror #8 was trying to convince the other jurors that the boy was not guilty, leading to extreme frustration towards Juror #8 and each other. Some jurors (specifically Juror #3) began to threaten the other jurors.
When the Jurors first entered the Jury Room, they felt that they would be in and out after the first vote. When Juror #8 voted not guilty they all became alarmed, they realized that this might take longer than previously thought. At first, as Juror #8 tried to convince them of the chance of probable doubt, they resisted all his attempts. Gradually, one by one, the men became exhausted of fighting against Juror #8 and changed their vote to not guilty, showing their general adaptation system working in the three stages of alarm, resistance and exhaustion.
The 12 jurors sat in the room, beginning to analyze every piece of information given to them. Certain jurors had to get over former stereotypes that they possessed before the trial. For example, Juror #3 believes that children have no respect for their parents anymore because they do not address them as sir or madam. Juror #4 made a false declaration about children who come from slummy neighborhoods. He believed that they all will forever be menaces to society and that they will never become a good person. He was flabbergasted when Juror #5 stated that he used to live in the worst of all slums, but today he is a good man. The use of groupthink helped them make a decision on the verdict. They are all part of an organized group that is trying to highlight agreement in this crucial decision. The men cooperated and achieved the goal that they were after, reaching a unanimous verdict of not guilty on probable cause.
Even though the men were extremely stressed out about the decision, they were eventually able to rationally make that decision. Stress can slow a person down but it will not shut that person down. When faced with a heavily weighted decision people tend to become stressed out. They spend more time worrying about making the wrong choice than the time they spend wondering what the right choice is. Stress is a normal human feeling that cannot be avoided and will always be present to a certain extent.
Cognitive Psychology
The jurors were faced with a difficult choice to make, their decision could either save a young man's life or put him to death. Cognitive Psychology focuses on information processing, problem solving and decision-making. The jurors were give an immense amount of information that they had to take in and decide whether the young man was guilty or not. Juror #8 analyzed the information, finding loopholes that no one else did. After sharing all of that information with the other jurors, more loopholes were found by other jurors. The remaining 11 jurors change their charge to not guilty.
Amygdala
While in the Jury Room the 12 men all became extremely restless with one another.
The amygdala is a structure in the limbic system, which is responsible for emotion and aggression. Juror #3 showed the most emotion and aggression. His aggression was shown when he threatened to kill Juror #8, and his emotion what shown when he broke down and started to cry after tearing up the picture of his son. Juror #3 used his Amygdala very often!
Far-sightedness
Juror #4 argues that perhaps the woman who claims to have witnessed the murder truly did see the murder. The men all recall her having marks on her nose that resembled those left by eyeglasses. The argument was if she was trying to fall asleep and witnessed the murder then most likely she did not have on her glasses, thus inhibiting her field of vision. Juror #4 retaliates with the argument of the chance of her being far-sighted then she would have been able to see the murder happening without her glasses on.
Case Study
In the movie 12 Angry Men, the jurors are concentrating on one specific case. They have been given information that they need to use to make their decision on a verdict. The case that they have been given is not being compared to any other case. They cannot generalize this case or relate it to any other previous experience by law and fairness to the defendant of the case.
Foot in the Door
Juror #8 uses this psychological technique in order to convince everyone that the boy is innocent by reasonable doubt. He first suggests that, perhaps the boy did not commit the crime. This is how he gets his foot in the door. Then as the other members of the jury begin to question his verdict he gives them good arguments as to why he feels this way and how some of the evidence just does not fit together. By the end of the movie he has fully convinced the other 11 jurors that there is enough information presents that the boy can be released on reasonable doubt.
Cite this page
The Presence of Stress in 12 Angry Men and What Caused It. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Character Analysis of the Jurors in 12 Angry Men
The movie 12 Angry Men is more than a movie about a murder case and a jury trying to find an accused man guilty or innocent. This movie is much more deeply then that. In actuality the movies characters actually represent the different types of people that exist in an American society.
The main character of this movie, with out a doubt, is juror 8. He in essence bodies what an American is. During the first vote, he is the only one to vote innocent because he is unsure. It's not easy to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it. Juror 8 is also good at coming up with good counter evidence. Some of his good counter evidence is an exact copy of the knife, how long it would take the witness [old man] to walk to the door, and that it was possible for the boy not to remember what movies he had seen. I feel the defense may have let things go by.
When thinking about old people the concept of being wise with age comes into mind, and this is exactly what juror 9 is. During the deliberation he is usually respectful, and he stands for what he believes in. Forgive me gentleman, I didn't mean to keep you waiting. Most importantly his thoughts are not racially motivated, and he raises the important fact that the lady who witnessed the murder probably didn't have her glasses on. I noticed those same little red patched on the sides of her nosel and I think certain things should be pointed out to this... Only an ignorant man would believe that.
Juror 11 resembles what a good American should be. He bases his thought on facts, and he is very detail oriented because throughout the movie he seen taking notes. As well, he keeps an open mind during the deliberations by defending both sides; I don't have to be loyal to on side or another. Juror 11 also believes in the American judicial system. He stands for what he believes in, and wants things to be done right. We have a responsibility to do; we are not here to fight. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict, and this is why we are strong.
Juror 6 could be classified as a somewhat representation of a common man. When he speaks he doesn't fully think about what hells saying, I'm not used to supposin and you couldn't be wronger. Juror 6 is also very respectful. This can be been when juror 9 is talking and juror 3 interrupts him and yells at him, so juror 6 tells juror 3 that If you yell at him once more, ill lay you
out."
Juror 10 is a racist, Pure and simple. He thinks people from the slums are lyres and that Ithey re all no good. He classifies all people not like him as they or those. His thoughts are very racially motivated and this is what ends up causing the group to exclude him from the talks.
Cite this page
A Character Analysis of the Jurors in 12 Angry Men. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
12 Angry Men: the Defense Attorney’s Speech
Gentlemen of the court, I wish to mention to you three pieces of proof that prove this young child is innocent. I would like to evaluate the acquisition of the knife, the old man hearing a shout, and the movie theater. The future of this young child is in your hands currently, make the right choice. Locate him innocent.
First of all, the blade that was acquired the evening of the murder. After battling with his father, he intended to get away from his home. He resides in the shanty town, a very dangerous place. Feeling he needed protection, he went to the shop and also got this blade. He is extremely experienced of blades, and below is something to think about. The injury that was located on his papa cut at a weird angle. It would have been a an underhand cut if this young boy had actually stabbed him. Not like the overhand wound found on his father.
What regarding the old man claiming to listen to the young boy shout? Exactly how could this be possible? The old man does not have that good of hearing. Likewise, at that very same time, the train was going by his house. This train is extremely loud. How could an old man with inadequate hearing hear this?. This old man is not a believable witness to the murder of this guy. You can not think what he stated. The train was simply as well loud for him to possibly listen to the yells of the kid.
After leaving his home, the kid visited a movie to avoid every one of this. He was under overall stress and anxiety. I am sure he did not care to take a look at the title of the movie. He probably simply wanted in to escape. This way his mind was focused on various other things other than his father. He thought that if he escaped. he would come back in a better state of mind to be with his papa.
I have provided you with the three best factors of evidence to verify the innocence of this young boy. Consider this, just how could a young boy do this to his father? Although he was a victim of abuse, I like is still inside him. That is why this young boy is innocent. Now keep in mind, Jury, this is a life and death scenario that sits in front of you. Make the best decision, or the young life of an innocent kid will certainly be ruined forever. The defense rests.
Cite this page
12 Angry Men: The Defense Attorney's Speech. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Focus on the Topic of Prejudice in the Book “The 12 Angry Men”
Bias stems from lots of things. It can originate from anyone at any moment. In some cases it belongs of an individual when they are born. A whole town, state, or country could reveal prejudice towards others. Prejudice in a lot of cases ends in physical violence. Hitler revealed a severe instance when he eliminated all of the Jews. He believed that they were all substandard and also the Germans were the remarkable race. Hitler did not assume all of his decisions all the way via. Bias is caused by the absence of expertise of others.
Guide, 12 Angry Men, revealed a lot of bias from the jurors. During the instance the majority of the jurors based their initial decision on a stereotype. They took a look at the offender's past background of criminal activity and simply presumed that he was guilty. Only one juror at the beginning had the guts to take on all the others with his ideas. As time passed he obtained others to follow him as they evaluated all the proof. The Defendant could have been placed in prison or even eliminated for a crime that he didn't commit. This prejudice might have ended in an awful mistake and could have taken this man's life or at the very least an excellent section of it.
In To Kill a Mockingbird the prejudice came from a whole community. The white section of the town believed that just because Tom Robinson was black he needs to be guilty. The black neighborhood was right when they said Tom was innocent. Throughout the situation every one of the evidence aimed far from Tom and towards Mr. Ewell. Atticus is mocked more than any person else in town due to the fact that he didn't have to safeguard Tom. He made the decision to do it since that is what he assumed was right. Even though Atticus showed evidence that would certainly have made it simple to convict Mr. Ewell Tom was convicted of rape. In the end this prejudice takes the life of Tom. Recognizing that regardless of what he did he would constantly be guilty he chose to try and also run away jail. He started climbing the fence and also after a brief caution they discharged several shots right into him. That killed him instantly. Even those warder showed prejudice. They really did not require that numerous bullets. Mr. Raymond was buffooned also. Everybody believed he was drunk 24 hours a day which's the only factor he married a black person. They thought he didn't comprehend what he was doing. They simply figured that was he drank was alcohol however it was just soda. Prejudice blocks individuals's capacities to believe straight.
Even Babe had bias in it. You can tell something is a problem when it also occurs with animals. Babe was placed in a poor placement in the first place. He was eliminated from his mom when he was actual little. From there he was offered a ranch. There the rest of the animals told him that pigs had no usage to any person. This pain Babe's feelings since he thought that he really did not have a function now. Infant ultimately recognized that he did have a purpose. He was the best lamb pig ever. He was much better than any dog they can put out there. Infant revealed everybody else that sometimes it isn't appearance that reveals who you are but rather it's the way you act. Mr. Hoggett needed to endure prejudice also. Despite the fact that the policies stated there was nothing wrong with a lamb pig the judges still disputed it. They claimed he would certainly lose respect by the board. When he went into Babe, instead Babe showed that Mr. Hoggett made the best decision.
The Cage had a serious quantity of prejudice. The tale occurs during World War II. During the war Hitler would certainly have any individual killed that is of Jewish origins. This places Riva's family in a great deal of problem. Everyday a few more people were pursued out as well as sent out to concentration camps. Repeatedly they have to get under their table as well as conceal in the cellar until the soldiers leave. Just to make the scenario worse their mommy is taken away. People begin getting sick as well as they can not pay for medicine. The soldiers didn't care. They would certainly do whatever Hitler told them. They lost their conscience to tell them what's right and also wrong. Hitler had them taught. This bias leads to family members dying.
All these publications or videos show prejudice since the writers or producers intend to show the visitors or visitors what they may be doing wrong. Bias isn't considered a big deal. These manufacturings showed that in most cases prejudice leads to death. Just often can it relapse with good. Prejudice is brought on by the absence of understanding of others.
Cite this page
The Focus on the Topic of Prejudice in the Book "The 12 Angry Men". (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Movie Analysis of 12 Angry Men, a Movie by Sidney Lumet
This motion picture is among the very best that has ever before been made. I believe that the writer did an amazing task with the script which is mostly what carries the film. When this film is seen several times it just appears to get better. The many fine points that are within this film are like nothing else film has ever done. This is a film that is shot in white and also black. Ths is best because the movie is some what an excellent vs. wickedness, or black and white. Tiny aspects like these are so much enjoyable to see throughout the movie.
This movie is fired primarily in a jury area whom the jurors are to determine the fate of an 18-year old who is charged of killing his papa. Within the jury room the film depends upon the stars to make it the masterpiece that it is. The stars are Martin Balsam, E. G. Marshall, Jack Klugman, Jack Warden, and Ed Begley play sustaining duties as jurors as tension develops between Lee J. Cobb, as well as Henry Fonda, the only juror to vote a murder suspect not guilty on the court's very first vote. All the jurors on this all-male jury are different as well as each have best duties.
The performing is outstanding. The slightly developed eighteen-year-old immigrant on trial for his father's murder might not look even more like a sufferer of the system, as well as these jurors, on the hottest day of the year, are as well distressed to move on with their lives. When Fonda, self-deprecating and calm, wishes to examine the proof better, the nuisance of the rest of the jury becomes evident as the jurors make use of racist lines such as "These people threaten, wild," "They do not know what the reality is," "Slums are reproducing grounds for criminals, as well as "They are terrible by nature" are all declarations which disclose the "us vs. them" worry of immigrants that they have. It is these slurs that the primary personality uses versus them to show that they really need to stop as well as believe logicly about the truths in the case. The black and white movie is appropriate to issues of right as well as wrong, a murder trial, and also the execution. The camera job, focusing on the jurors' faces and also the mindsets they reveal, as well as tiny clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors produce a huge canvas of twelve angry men who will certainly decide whether the implicated will certainly pass away or live. Small "sub-scenes" within the jury room are one of the most interesting which give actors an opportunity to interact, and also Joseph Sweeney (Juror # 9), the senior juror first encouraged by Fonda's debates, is especially remarkable for his heat and his capacity to be ethical when a male needs his assistance.
I don't really recognize exactly how to discuss all of the best points of the movie in a couple of words, so I will just call several of my preferred lines.
- Juror # 3 "He don't even speak good English" immigrant juror fixes him.
- Juror # 3 "If you shout I will certainly kill you imply it" ..." Let me go I will kill him"
- Juror # 3 "You could throw out all the other realities" ... "What about the various other truths?"
- Juror # 3 concerning the witness: "HE testified in open court he banked on it" be sure about anything"
- A juror supplies a throat lozenge and also juror # 8 approves it making close friends. "HE is old he angled
- Juror # 8 pertains to the help of the single juror # 3 and reassures him while their coats represent their personalities by black and white.
I assume this is among the most effective flicks of perpetuity. With just dialog this is an exceptionally amazing film. Without any special impacts, it is genuinely outstanding as well as one of my preferred flicks of perpetuity. I can not explain exactly how the whole movie harmonizes completely throughout the movie. The many symbols, the camera angles, the humidity in the court room, the white and black color, the personalties of all the jurors, every little thing simply fits flawlessly to the movie. Once more- THIS MOVIE IS TRULY INCREDIBLE.
Cite this page
A Movie Analysis of 12 Angry Men, a Movie by Sidney Lumet. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Principles of the Justice and the Punishment for the Failed Responsibilities in 12 Angry Men
Justice can only be described as a fair and reasonable decision or action that leads to the triumph of the greater good. Our justice system is set up to make that kind of decision to those who are being persecuted or to the person demanding a punishment for failed responsibilities. In the play 12 Angry Men, 12 men appointed for jury duty, on a hot summer's day, must come together to reason the life of a teenage boy put on trial for the murder of his father. Spoiler, the verdict being "not guilty" does not properly summarize the battles that went on between and within each juror. From my stand point, justice never had a chance of almost being miscarried throughout the trial because of the strong argumentative elements involved within the defendant's trial. This was all due to Juror 8's confident observations that drew in the support from open minded jurors, and the constant cross examination of evidence that later became the heart of the discussion in the jury room.
Being that the play's setting is in the 1950's and the jurors were all men of the same race and it is implied that the defendant is the complete opposite skin color of the 12 men, you would think they would most likely all have the same biased opinion. Yet Juror 8, the first and only juror to vote "not guilty", never backed down when voicing his opposite opinion as he shared his views with conviction and compassion. For example, after the other jurors argue with Juror 8 on why there was no need for a further discussion because the defendant was clearly guilty, two jurors grab a pencil and paper to keep them entertained before Juror 8 snatches the supplies angrily saying, "This isn't a game. (Page 10)." Juror 8's statement and reaction confirms that he takes his responsibility of a juror seriously. He acknowledges that he has the power to send a man to his death therefore he repeatedly brought up the boy's past and current accounts to the other jurors to take into consideration. Having at least one man in the room, who wasn't lazy and uncaring, later started a fair trial for justice.
Even thought they were all the same race, these men appointed to be jurors in 12 Angry Men did come from different occupations and environments. Their differences makes the range of their personal views and personalities bigger because some men eventually showed how much more open minded they were. Little by little Juror 5 and Juror 4 slowly became more vocal in the discussion for the verdict against the defendant. In the text, Juror 5 announces his change to "not guilty" the second time the foreman calls for a vote (Page 15). By him starting off as very quiet around the other men, guessing because he felt like an alien around these other men who didn't have to grow up in a slum neighborhood, emphasizes that what he truly thinks in this case needed to be said. Then we have Juror 4, one of the men who strongly believed the defendant was guilty, who finally followed the rules given by the judge saying, "I'm sorry, there's reasonable doubt in my mind. (Page 20)." The rules of the court suggest that you should convict "guilty" unless there is reasonable doubt in your mind, meaning that there is a possibility that the defendant could not have done the crime.
Before the defendant had a chance of possibly getting the evidence in his case cross exanimated, suggesting that he was given the verdict "guilty", and the jurors unknowingly broke apart every detail they could. First, witness 1's testimony states that he saw the defendant run down the building's stairs seconds after the old man heard a thud from the upstairs apartment where the murder happened. In the play, Juror 8 explains how he noticed how slow the old man walked therefore making it impossible for the witness to get to his door, claiming it took him fifteen seconds, to see the boy run off; He even did a simulation by timing the distance, which was thirty one seconds, to make the other men think carefully about the evidence (Page 13&14). A big eye opener in the case was when Juror 8 pulled out the same exact switchblade that was found to be the murder weapon. It was said that blade was a one of a kind and there was no coincidence the boy, as he claims, lost his blade hours prior to the time of death of his abusive father. Yet what they didn't know was that the blade cost no more than two dollars at a pawn shop less than two blocks away from the building complex where the defendant lived.
As you can see, the main reason justice never had a chance of being miscarried in this trail points back to pairing Juror 8 in this diverse group of men. Juror 8 creates this rippling effect within the other jurors that makes them question and observe everything they experienced throughout the trial. Juror 8's full forward approach to the other men showed how he was not going to be pressured or frightened to uncaringly vote to make everybody's life easier. He is such a figure of how opinionated someone should be within a group of those with harsh and questionable views on the world. Yes, there was discriminating prejudice by Juror 10 because of the race of the defendant but, thanks to other jurors pointing out his ignorance, Juror 8 was able to sit back and focus on his convincible tactic to calmly make those uninformed minds aware of the actions for fair justice.
Works Cited
- Rose, Reginald. Twelve Angry Men. New York, N.Y.: Dramatic Pub., 1989. Print
Cite this page
The Principles of the Justice and the Punishment for the Failed Responsibilities in 12 Angry Men. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Adult Point of View of a Lower Class Teenager in the Play 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose
12 Angry Men Essay
No matter how many changes are made overtime, people are selfish. Throughout the years, culture has changed, but values and human behavior has not. Where someone is located in the social class will, by some means, come back to them in a negative way. In Reginald Rose's play "12 Angry Men", he discusses the adult point of view of a lower class teenager, and the consequences of prejudice, impatience, and the life or death situations that the members of the jury brought into the jury room.
Prejudice is a problem everyone faces once in their lives. In "12 Angry Men", the main prejudice is derived from where the characters come from. People from the 'slums' are lower class, and have a lot of stereotypes against them. They are seen as insignificant, and worthless members of their society. In the play, when referring to someone living in the slums, the person is simply called "one of 'them"" (Rose 20). They are also thought of as dangerous, juror number four even states, "the children of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society" (Rose 21). It was wrong of him to say such a judgmental statement, because he was inconsiderate the probability that one of the jury members could have in fact been from the slums himself. The discrimination towards these victims of injustice strongly affected the trial at hand. Today, prejudice comes from what age group is being discussed. Teenagers are often seen as lazy and self-involved, and young children are naïve. For example, if an employer is attempting to hire a teenager and he or she has a bias on the age group, possibly originated from the teenagers in the employers life such as their own children, then it might affect the employers want to hire the teenager. As the stereotypes are far harmless than the ones verbalized in the play, the idea of the presence of prejudice is still relevant today and affects the lives of children of all ages.
Patience is key, and impatience will change a person's attitude. Without patience, today's youth is unbearable. Tranquility and composure are almost needed as a second nature for parents and teachers to tolerate the behavior of young adults and children. In the play, patience was important in the jury room, because the setting hadn't been the ideal place to decide a boy's future. The room did not have air conditioning; it only had a window and a water fountain to escape the evening heat. With that being said, the jurors were easy to rile up into anger and make, in some cases, their only goal to leave the jury room as soon as possible. Their bickering and impatience to go home made them want to overlook and ignore the important details to prove the boys innocence. When stuck in a small, and stuffy room, a boy's life is not as significant for egotistical people.
Live or die, a choice that often is not in the hands of the beholder. In the play, the future of a nineteen year old boy is in the hands of twelve men. In the very beginning, the judge urges the jurors of the impact of their current duty, he states "I urge you to deliberate honestly and thoughtfully. You are faced with a grave responsibility" (Rose 21). The judge is aware of the importance of this case and that "one man is dead", and "the life of another is at stake" (Rose 21). There is also the determination of juror number eight and his knowledge of the seriousness of the case. He was not satisfied with the trial, and the juror was unable to let the boy die without looking at all the facts. An example of today's life and death situations have to do with how badly people want to stick to their opinions. While protesting, it is not rare for police to get too involved even though citizens of many countries have the right to protest. Depending on how persistent the protesters are, the police, whom are known for police brutality, will take barbarous actions. Life and death situations cannot be taken lightly, it is a person's life in peril.
To conclude, in the play "12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, he uses vague details and lacks using names for the purpose of making the play connectable to all readers. Topics such as prejudice, patience, and life or death situations are discussed and applicable to the modern day. Everyone has to live with these struggles, yet the ones who cause these situations are mostly too selfish to realize the impact of what they are saying or doing. Lives can be at stake, feelings will be hurt and futures will be crushed. Although written sixty years ago, Roses play will be talked about for years to come for its vast number of themes and relatable topics.
Works Cited
- Rose, Reginald. Twelve Angry Men. Two Plays for Study. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Limited, 1967. 11-51. Print
Cite this page
The Adult Point of View of a Lower Class Teenager in the Play 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
A Review of 12 Angry Men, a Movie by Sidney Lumet
The movie "12 Angry Men" entail controversial choice making by the jury. A chamber of the jurors is anticipated to supply judgment. A Puerto Rican boy is brought before the court for eliminating his dad with a switchblade knife. The instance experienced blended responses on whether the young boy was guilty or otherwise guilty. At the starting of the movie, eleven of the jurors believed and also thought the kid murdered his father as well as examined their proof of the trial, while one jury believed the child was blameless (12 Angry Men: 1957). The eleven jurors voted the young boy was guilty, but after a heated dispute, they transferred to a not-guilty decision. The court choices were influenced by argumentation. This paper will certainly examine how argumentation influenced the juror decision making in the "12 Angry Men."
The 12 jurors can not conform. People match one contract when they rely on one meaning of a constant concern. In the "Twelve Angry Men," the jurors are affected by the obscurity of the situation; exactly how the boy killed his father with a switchblade knife, the moment constraints as well as each juror knowledge of the matter at hand. It is shown in the starting of the film where a heated argument is precluded by a preliminary ballot. Just one court voted not guilty for the young boy (Rose, 2016). This ballot was inclined because of a panic of appearing deviant. Undoubtedly, as the jurors cast their first vote, there is hesitancy of those who elected guilty. What we can see right here is that there is weak conviction affected by conformity. Without consistency, disagreements occur as each individual attempt to protect his/her setting. In this instance, the volatile male suggests that the child is, naturally, guilty after the outcome of the votes, while Henry Fonda's insurance claims that "there is always has to be one." These two men portray the power of conformity to persuade the various other jurors that a guilty vote is valid.
Time restrictions influenced the decision making of the juror. Argumentation in the justice system is based on the time constraints. Thus, the viewed force upon a jury and also by a court can influence the jury procedure and also construct argumentation, which influences the decision making. Regarding timeliness of decision is a crucial aspect that affects the "12 Angry Men." The arguments that develop by the court is as a result of time constraints, which is further laid upon their requirements and also desires. Cleary, most of the jurors, in this situation, highlights their work as well as various other facets of the life Jury commitment prevents their life's development, producing an undefined time constraint. For instance, the sickly guy asserts that he has three terminals to participate in, while an additional jurors claim that he have a ticket to a Yankees video game (Rose, 2016). So, every jury placed much pressure on the time restraints. It's no question that time restrictions limited the heated debate concerning the boy's killing and probably why lots of jurors voted guilty.
Augmentation brought about attitude adjustment and persuasion. Persuasion plays an essential duty in the movie the "12 Angry Men." The central course to persuasion is the process through which a private thinks about something and also is impacted by the power of the debate. In the "12 Angry Men," Fonda alters his mind as well as cast his votes as 'not guilty' in a well thoughtful manner. He insists on his factors with facts and also inevitably influences the other jurors. Similarly, the entrepreneur utilizes his tolerant nature to construct a solid case grounded on evidence. He appreciates Fonda test to utilize the central training course to persuasion. The course of persuasion is featured by fabricated triggers surrounding the cases as opposed to the case's practical validity. For example, the sickly male persuades the various other jurors to interpret a perspective grounded on ethnic and racial motivates (Rose, 2016). Due to the fact that he is an African-Americans, he further encourages the jurors to sentence the guy. He has a lack of confidence toward the African-American. The gent jurors that respect the fate of the accused boy are concentrated on justice and are participated in the debate to the central concept. This is revealed through Fonda's personality that share a capability. He relies on justice and also attempts to encourage other jurors that the young boy is innocent. So, the attitude and also the path taken by each juror in the argument influence their choice making concerning the kid's situation.
Group argumentation led the jurors to dedicate a guilty judgment. Drawing from Waller et al. (2013 ), group augmentation results in groupthink where members of the team worth unanimity at the expenditure of logical decision and fall short to insufficient think about choices. When Juror8 tests the conversation and controls it for his purposes, Group thinking is clearly seen in the film. Juror 8 does not count on the young boy's story yet feel that the kid is qualified to sufficient considerations. The other Juror makes a decision with one voice to convince Juror 8 that the young boy is guilty. The debate in the court room comes to be warm as each jury tries to provide his claim utilizing reasonings and evidence. Nevertheless, Juror 8 is not convinced and also denies others juror's remarks. In the end, Juror 8 engages with the various other Juror's in joint problem resolving and also try to develop partnerships (Sunstein, 2007). So, completion result of all the jurors is as a result of participation, which was headed by the juror's debates.
In examining the 12 Angry Men, augmentation is the base for the juror's decision. The debate in the jury space caused the conclusion of the decision. Without the augmentation process, the choice of the jurors would certainly not have been warranted because not sensible, and evidence was present. It is clear that the justice system is marked by the warmed conversation including arguments, persuasion, adjustment of mindset, team thinking and so forth. The end result of a court case is based on all these facets in the distribution of justice. It is no question that argumentation in the 12 Angry Men influenced the decision or guided production of the Jurors.
References
- 12 Angry Men (1957). (N.d.). Retrieved February 06, 2017, from http://www.filmsite.org/twelve.html
- Rose, R. (2016). Twelve angry men. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Group polarization and 12 angry men. Negotiation Journal, 23 (4), 443-447.
- Waller, M. J., Sohrab, G., & Ma, B. W. (2013). Beyond 12 angry men: Thin-slicing film to illustrate group dynamics. Small Group Research, 44 (4), 446-465.
Cite this page
A Review of 12 Angry Men, a Movie by Sidney Lumet. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Analysis of the Movie 12 Angry Men
The movie 12 Angry Men gradually moves from an argument about placements to whether an 18-year-old young boy need to be provided the death penalty. As well as, the movie likewise includes an integrative negotiation through excellent negotiation techniques made use of by juror number 8. Juror number 8 facilitates this shift by separating the people from the trouble, focusing on passions, and also working out with unbiased criteria. Juror number 8's settlement techniques were important in creating a practical and also educated decision by the jury.
The start of the settlement was defined by positional negotiation versus the vote of juror number 8. The opposing 11 jurors tried and took a position to persuade juror number 8 to change his vote to guilty. The opposing 11 jurors took a setting, as well as when juror 8 refuted their position with concerns of why they assumed the charged was guilty they dismissed his concerns as absurd as well as stayed with their original setting. This series of the arrangement mishandled and identified by disorganization, yelling, and a lack of factor. If the negotiation had continued to be positional, relationships with juror 8 could have been harmed irreparable, which would have extended the arrangement. If juror 8 had actually yielded to the positional disagreement of the opposing 11 jurors then it would have produced a risky arrangement not based on careful evaluation of the facts of the situation given up court. The start of this arrangement reveals us how inadequate as well as inefficient positional negotiating can be.
To make this settlement more efficient juror 8 had to separate individuals from the issue by taking into account different assumptions, control of feelings, and also excellent communication. Juror 8 not just asked the other jurors to consider his perception of the instance, but he also considered the young boy guilty. Juror 8 thoroughly listened without disturbing the other jurors in order to deduce their feelings and just how their feelings contributed to their viewpoint. This was completed by asking every juror to state why they believe the suspect to be guilty. By concentrating on the genuine emotions of the jurors, juror 8 was then able to highlight the seriousness of the problem and make the negotiation pro-active. Juror number 8 additionally allowed his challengers to allow off steam. He let them go on tirades, shouting rampages, as well as also sustained personal attacks all without responding to their psychological outbursts. These rants and personal attacks came particularly from jurors 3, 7, and also 10. Because the jurors did not know each various other and also felt aggressive as well as questionable toward each various other, communication was additionally a problem right from the begin. Efficient communication in between the jurors was also hard since several of the jurors that elected guilty were not communicating constructively. Instead they were simply trying to persuade various other jurors to vote guilty. Juror 8 conquered these communication issues by paying attention proactively to the viewpoints of all jurors and also taking into account each other jurors' viewpoint, not assaulting the views of the various other jurors, as well as being concise as well as clear when engaging in communication with the various other jurors. By separating individuals from the issue, juror number 8 was ultimately able to convince his challengers to agree with him and also rule blameless.
Each of the preliminary opposing jurors had underlying passions that contributed to the issue that juror 8 had to recognize and also resolve. At the beginning of the negotiation all of the jurors with the exception of juror 8 wanted making a decision the judgment in a timely manner so they could take care of other company. Especially, juror 3 was interested in punishing a troubled youth that reminded him of his own kid, who he had not talked to in 2 years. Juror 7 had an interest in not missing out on a baseball video game that he had tickets to, and also juror 10 had an interest in penalizing the suspect because of bias he held versus people who originated from bitter pills of community. Jurors 1 as well as 12 simply wanted to be done with the whole process. Jurors 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11 were most thinking about making an informed choice based on the realities of the instance. In order to identify these passions, juror 8 asked the concern "Why?" to every juror's guilty vote. As soon as juror 8 had actually recognized the rate of interests of each juror, he had the ability to start talking about each passion. Juror 8 asked his fellow jurors multiple times just how they would certainly act if they had been defeated by their daddies regularly as the suspect had. This assisted his challengers to recognize why the suspect had such a struggling past, and when everyone stopped seeking to the suspect's past rap sheet they were able to concentrate on the instance at hand. Juror 8 utilized the rate of interests of his challengers to accomplish his objective of an unanimous choose blameless by being difficult on the rate of interests as well as attacking the trouble that the rate of interests developed instead of making use of personal attacks.
Negotiating with unbiased standards showed to be arguably the most reliable of juror 8's techniques to encourage his fellow jurors to vote innocent. Juror 8 was under pressure from the beginning when he was the only juror not to elect the suspect guilty, as well as never ever as soon as did juror 8 yield to stress. Juror 8 did not provide concessions to his challengers, and also his challengers were not able to withstand to his advancements via making use of unbiased criteria. Juror 8 used the facts that were presented in the test by the senior man that heard the lady and also the altercation who experienced the murder through the passing el train to stem argument. He utilized reason to demonstrate that the testimony given was not adequate to create an exact verdict because the el train would certainly have made it nearly impossible for the elderly male to hear the run-in, and it would certainly have taken the elderly male too long to get up from his bed as well as make it to the door where he can have seen the awesome fleeing the crime. Factor was likewise made use of to determine that the lady who watched the murder from her window probably did not have sufficient vision to identify the awesome because she had the very same glasses marks as juror 4 did. Juror 8 prepared to present the objective standards that the murder tool was not so rare by mosting likely to the suspect's area as well as locating a dagger similar to it. This objective requirements decorated the concept in the various other jurors' minds. That perhaps this can have been a one in a million coincidence that the murder weapon as well as the blade the suspect acquired were two totally various knives. Juror 8 offered this unbiased standards in a well considered and also organized way. Through cautious analysis of the facts juror 8 convinced his opponents that the proof and eyewitness accounts were within an affordable question as well as a result not requiring of a sentence.
As a result of juror 8 separating the people from the trouble, focusing on rate of interests, as well as discussing with objective standards. Juror 8 was able to efficiently convince all of his fellow jurors to elect the acquittal of the suspect. Juror 8 efficiently transformed a settlement that started as inefficient as well as positional as well as previously owned approaches gone over in guide Getting To Yes to transform the negotiation to one that was integrative. As soon as juror 8 had actually recognized passions and also controlled feelings he had the ability to make use of unbiased requirements to persuade his objectors to agree with his point of views.
Cite this page
The Analysis of the Movie 12 Angry Men. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
Media as Bias in the Essay the Bias of Language, Bias of Pictures by Neil Postman and Steve Powers
According to a survey of 1,500 Americans, done by the Pew Research Center for the People and Press, Almost half of the surveyed thought that American media had bias, and 73% thought that American media often times did not show all sides of the Argument. Major media outlets are mainly privately owned. This opening up the opportunity for their own political views, thus allowing for the possibility of politically motivated censorship and bias.
The monopolization of American media and publishing industries serves as a form of censorship and bias. That reduces the opportunity of independent or controversial views and or opinions.
Major outlets such as New York Times, Huffington Post, Time, present a clearly Liberal biased point of view, while outlets such as Fox News, Conservative Tribune, New York Post clearly present a conservative biased form of view. Each are equally as damaging to the preservation of non biased spreading of information. Each of these media outlets will often present their own form of bias, censoring certain events and or cherry picking details of a specific event or story. For example, Liberal media outlets may censor or not report shooting events that were stopped by an armed lawful citizen or police officer. While reporting events where a citizen or police officer were not able to stop the shooter. This may be because it does not fit into their political agenda or agree with their political views. The same goes for Conservative media outlets, which may not report that the weapon used in the crime was legally purchased, as that may not support their political agenda or opinions. (Alterman 2010)
For those who only focus on watching one or two news outlets, who present the same censorship or bias. This in turn has the possibility of suppressing their independent views or presenting controversy, because the argument presented to them is biased and one sided, and they may not receive both sides of the argument and or story.
Another example would be political correctness. If censorship is suppression of expression by force, political correctness is suppression of expression by cognitive assent or social pressure.
In other words, it does not usually refer to the exercise of state power but most often refers to judgements taken about the political and social volatility of expression, and a decision to avoid (or not) sensitive or offensive expressions. Or to utilize some expressions rather than others, in light of a competing social 'good'. (Reinelt 2007) In turn political correctness (most evident in more Liberal media outlets) suppresses certain individual ideas or controversial ideas or events for the sake of "not offending" certain viewers. If an idea is deemed too "offensive" or "insensitive" it may not be discussed at all, or discussion of it could be categorized as taboo. Which is not a complete reflection of some individual views.
But it can be argued that there are alternatives to mainstream media and that there are many places to express individual opinions and ideas. Correct, there is a vast area where information and opinions can be spread. However mainstream media will always dominate through viewer reach and the ability to influence the average viewer. The average viewer simply does not have the passion to actively pursue the right facts and non-biased information, so mainstream news sources, as in newspapers and televised news will be their "go to" for information. Thus, the in the end in individual opinions or controversial events will be censored on mainstream media if it does not fit their agenda or their bias.
Concluding this, mainstream media and publishing has the ability to suppress controversial views or opinions as well as individual views and often uses such abilities when reporting information. There is bias in mainstream media, stemming from the views of the privately owned corporation, which in turn suppresses and censors controversial events or opinions, as well as some individual opinions or thoughts.
Cite this page
Media as Bias in the Essay The Bias of Language, Bias of Pictures by Neil Postman and Steve Powers. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
The Differences in Media Coverage of Crimes against Indigenous Women
This essay discusses media predisposition and the differences in between mainstream and alternative media. The trainee focuses on 2 information electrical outlets' coverage of the high price of criminal activities against indigenous females.
Prejudice in the Media
Culture consumes mass details from various sources of information electrical outlets on a daily basis. They are heavily relied upon as an information resource and also as social amusement as well as are usually assumed to be trustworthy. Nevertheless, this presumption isn't always exact, as media predisposition is widespread across the globe. And also due to this, it's important to find out just how to take in with a much more critical eye. While every one of this info is a easily accessible as well as effective way to notify, it has a consistent shifting viewpoint. It is difficult for a private or outlet to have no prejudices whatsoever, but some media electrical outlets will certainly take this to the severe as well as release very biased material. Households of missing as well as murdered Indigenous females have lengthy argued that the media pays less focus to missing out on and killed Indigenous females. Media responses have varied from including the objections right into their insurance coverage to a denial that the problem exists. The mainstream media feeds right into a society's all-natural tendencies and perfects. Mainstream media consist of large companies under company umbrellas with experienced journalists as well as huge resources that report on newspaper article and share tales with a variety of channels: print, video clip, broadcast, digital, podcasts and live recordings.
Reporters are continuously trying to modify point of views with biased info to subject the general public to the corporate norms as well as suggestions. Showing that company media ownership stifles independent voices and perspectives. Nowadays, conventional media has the largest audience, the largest marketing profits, as well as the most resources. Due to this, it is impossible to report everything; selectivity is inescapable. It constantly ends up in the media being controlled, restricted and just a selective version of the information offered. Numerous news organizations mirror, or are regarded to mirror in some way, the viewpoint of the geographical, ethnic, as well as nationwide population they largely serve which results in a disparity concerning what real world concerns need to be attended to. However, Project Censored, an American non-profit media watchdog organization, is working to educate pupils and also the public about the importance of a complimentary press for democratic self-government to highlight tales around crucial problems that are continuously overlooked.
Task Uncensored Story: Missing and also Murdered Indigenous Women and also Girls
According to a ThinkProgress report from August 2019, Indigenous females as well as girls faced physical misuse with a stunning consistency that totals up to an "epidemic" of violence, including murder, kidnapping, sexual trafficking as well as rape. Therefore carelessness as well as ineptitude, in addition to the ins and out of criminal territory on tribal grounds, which restricts which offenses tribal courts might seek, law enforcement and the judicial system rarely identify, let alone charge or found guilty, the criminals of these criminal activities.
Law enforcement as well as the judicial system seldom determine a lot less fee or found guilty the perpetrators of these criminal activities. "I would not say we're extra vulnerable," Annita Lucchesi, a Southern Cheyenne descendant and also exec director of the Sovereign Bodies Institute, specified, "I 'd say we're targeted." The Urban Indian Health Institute (UIHI) discovered 5712 records of killed or missing out on Indigenous ladies and ladies throughout the United States in 2016, however just 116 were logged in the Department of Justice's database. However, significant media publications such as the Washington Post, Time publication, as well as others may have given the suggestion to US customers that the epidemic of killed and missing out on Indigenous women is exclusively a Canadian problem. In addition to protection of Canada's National Inquiry, US corporate information outlets have provided practically little insurance coverage of missing out on as well as murdered Indigenous ladies in the United States.
The situations of missing and also killed Indigenous females and also ladies get little to no mainstream press protection, with some notable exceptions: one New York Times story on the problem was referred to as "a small recommendation in a sea of loss" in a January 2020 article in the New Republic Both actions as well as dilemmas on the Missing and also Murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW) are both grossly underreported. Inevitably, Sovereign Bodies Institute, the Brave Heart Society, as well as the Urban Indian Health Institute, the prominent campaigners, point to systemic racism as an origin of the dilemma, mentioning the embedded legacies of settler manifest destiny, concerns with police, an absence of comprehensive and reliable information, and also flawed policymaking.
The Mainstream Media: The New Republic.
Because 1914, The New Republic has actually been a liberal American magazine of political as well as art commentary. It was founded by essential Progressive Movement leaders in an effort to strike an equilibrium between progressivism centred on humanitarianism and also moral intensity. It, on the other hand, sought a foundation in clinical research of social issues. On January 22, 2020, the New Republic released a short article: "The cynical crisis of Missing as well as Murdered Indigenous Women." The author, Nick Martin, writes about the Murdered and Missing Indigneous women's situation patterns and the rejection to do what's needed to stop them. In 2017, 5,646 Native ladies were reported missing in the United States. He specifies how they each came to be: a name attached to a figure. Exactly how, "there will certainly be various other items, more names to find out as the crisis of MMIW drags on.
An additional indigenous lady eliminated, another name, one more headline and so on goes the cycle." Martin says that there are patterns in this situation, patterns of fierce males and also extractive markets breeze through land they do not own to take lives that don't come from them, patterns of police terminations, and patterns of government officials disregarding useful, sovereignty-first reforms and instead hoarding the sort of power that keeps the dilemma active. "Even from the most unlikely of areas, a standard acknowledgment that something awful is taking place has gotten here." There have been steps made to place an end to the physical violence. States have passed task forces as well as funded research studies as well as developed six-figure incomes for investigatory experts to help them fill up the spaces. Martin clarifies that it should be clear that a single solution to MMIW will certainly not appear "at the breeze of an individual's fingers," that as a matter of fact, there is no single service. He shows that the tales as well as data are so shocking, as well as skewed against females in Indian nations, that extensive uproar should've took place long ago.
The Alternative Media: ThinkProgress Report
ThinkProgress is an American political information site. With a favourable prejudice towards liberal reasons, ThinkProgress is a progressive public law study and also advocacy company funded by John Podesta. On August 24, 2019, ThinkProgress published a post entitled: "Missing and murdered ladies is a grim, unresolved problem. Native communities are demanding activity." In the short article, author Danielle McLean, composed of a young woman who experienced this initial hand when she was only just strolling by the street. Three males left the automobile and, unprovokingly, started beating her and her buddies. One selected her up and also threw her against a vehicle and began to kick her and also smashed among her legs while onlookers did nothing to fix this. The Native ladies's very presence was all the provocation required for their assailants, who would usually shout racial slurs as they drove or strolled by. McLean uses this tale on the fierce acts dedicated, as well as the surprising regularity that mirrors day-to-day fact for Native women to provoke an emotional feedback. She tries to reveal the lack of media insurance coverage and how it's been a part of the trouble. How wire service have actually historically offered an out of proportion amount of
coverage to white victims as a result of: lack of newsroom diversity, stories they thought will generate ratings, as well as a certain level of "pure discrimination," Joshua Benton, director of Harvard University's Nieman Journalism Lab, told ThinkProgress. Danielle McLean exploits feeling in her short article to influence readers towards a liberal point of view on MMIW underrepresentation. She discusses how existing regulations provide under-resourced and also understaffed tribal police little power; the large violence against Native ladies as well as the abysmal failure by the federal government to effectively resolve it. In the past, task forces have actually studied violence versus Native ladies, yet members of the native neighborhood say it's not enough. How legislation has merely scratched the surface. Present laws provide undermanned as well as under-resourced tribal cops little power to investigate as well as prosecute non-tribal members who commit such crimes, said Tom Rodgers, acting president of the Global Indigenous Council. Essentially, the write-up published by ThinkProgress has a pessimistic tone; made use of meaningful words and also didn't reveal adequate truths and also tried to share that the efforts made currently with the MMIW problem simply aren't enough.
Comparing the Mainstream as well as Alternative Media
Both articles, released by the New Republic and ThinkProgress both offer concentrate the underrepresented voices and also underreporting of the missing and also murdered Indigenous women. Both short articles agree that something requires to be done about this present issue and that there is no one single service that can ameliorate this. Yet, the point of view in which the articles are written differ. The write-up released by the New Republic provides the example of the patterns and also a rejection to do what's essential to stop them. Patterns of terrible males and markets, patterns of tribal sovereignty being threatened and patterns of cops dismissal. Contraily the article released by ThinkProgress highlights the failures of understanding, in an effort to bring awareness. The New Republic post is confident, informative and also descriptive. While the tone of the ThinkProgress post is grim and opinionated. The difference in between the two write-ups is that the New Republic is more informational, such as the progression on this issue, to notify the viewers while ThinkProgress disregarded any development made on this concern as well as was important as well as overall composed with a pessimism prejudice.
Final thought
While comparing mainstream as well as alternative media, it is clear that details can be adjusted as well as shaped to portray details programs. Despite the fact that both information sites focus on the very same concern, the method it was interpreted is different. While the New Republic mostly focused on informing the reader on patterns on the problem, government variables, the ThinkProgress post concentrated on the neglect of this issue in an initiative to reveal understanding. Generally, the tone of the New Republic write-up is notified, reasonable, as well as positive, but the tone of the ThinkProgress article is downhearted, unconvinced, and opinionated. Revealing a perspective moving prejudice in journalism. Whilst journalistic criterion is impartiality or "objectivity" in any given news article, it is practically impossible to complete entirely. These presumptions are nearly constantly overt and systematic (in order to progress a details program), as opposed to regarded and also unintended.
References
- Martin, N. (2020, January 22). The Cyclical Crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women. Retrieved October 13, 2021 from The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/156263/cyclical- crisis-missing-murdered-indigenous-women
- McLean, D. (2019, August 24). Missing and murdered women is a grim, unsolved problem. Native communities are demanding action. ThinkProgress. Retrieved October 11, 2021
- https://archive.thinkprogress.org/missing-and-murdered-women-is-a-grim-unsolved-problem-native-communities-are-demanding-action-cdde640e38b3/
- Search and Learn the Bias of News Media. (2021, October 7). Retrieved October 11, 2021, from https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
- #1. Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. (2020, December 1). Retrieved October 12, 2021, from Project Censored. https://www.projectcensored.org/1-missing-and-murdered-indigenous- women-and-girls/
Cite this page
The Differences in Media Coverage of Crimes Against Indigenous Women. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
How Media and Television has Influenced a Generation
The Television has done what few other inventions could, that is affecting nearly every aspect of life. Whether easing access to news and information, causing social progression, biasing minds, effecting family and time usage, changing work ethic and priorities, influencing the talk of times, or setting the platform for other huge inventions there is no doubt that the television shapes the life of Americans.
Television shapes what normality and acceptability in society is mainly due to the fact that 99% of households watch television and that the television is on an average of 5 and 1/21?2 hours a day (Norman, "Television and Statistics"). What was perceived as fun 40 years ago may be looked upon as boring nowadays, what is okay to air on television today may have caused riots not long ago. With the power and influence of television, one is able to connect with different types of people and cultures and often this can help extinguish prejudices. After the civil rights movement of the 1960s moods of most Americans had shifted towards one of equality between blacks and whites. However, there was still a good number of Americans who held prejudices. In the 1970s a handful of television shows featuring all or highly black casts were introduced such as That's My Mama, Good Times, What's Happening?, and Sanford & Son. Many of these would rise to big success and would help to further integrate the idea of equality into American homes. When Interracial marriage became legal in 1967 approval was only at 20% yet only 8 years with only 1/3 of Americans now in support a hit show would help push for normality. The Jeffersons first aired in 1975 and ran for 11 seasons while featuring a prominent interracial marriage. By the time the show had ended in 1985 approval had nearly reached half the country. Many other shows have touched on sensitive issues and made a big impact on the issues themselves. Shows such as All In the Family, Roseanne, and Glee have appeared through the years and have tackled sensitive issues like political matters, gender roles, racism, and lgbt issues (Shrum).
However, other progressions in society have not been so helpful to society. In the early days of television, a code of ethics had been adopted called "The Code of Practices for Television Broadcasters". This code aimed to prevent many negative practices such as profanity, anti-god material, most sexual material, drug use, and violence. If that code had stayed in effect (the justice department effectively suspended the code in 1983) most of the hit shows of today would not exist due to the increase in violence and sexual activity among television shows of today. It is hard to imagine a world where Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, Jersey Shore, or any of the numerous reality television shows do not exist (Shrum).
Television has also made it easier to access information. News channels are plentiful and every television channel can provide some type of information on a topic. Before television, news could only be heard quickly through the radio and one could not actually see any photos or video until the day after in the newspaper. Television also changes how people interpret a big happening. Reading about an event like 9-11 would evoke some emotion however actually seeing the sheer terror and chaos for oneself hits an even deeper level. Reading about an election is sure to bring up some feelings, but actually seeing the cheers of one camp and the sadness emitted from the other is sure to bring heavier opinions. In this sense, Television has served a different purpose as an emotional amplifier. Smaller news such as sports has also taken on a much bigger factor with the television. Nearly every night there is some kind of televised sport and of course on a fall weekend football can be seen on a plethora of channels. Sports also hold the trophy for most viewership as the Super Bowl is routinely one of the most watched programs of the year. Information regarding advertised products is also easier to find since the average American will watch 2 million 30-second long commercials before the age of 65. Other information that has been made easier to find includes weather, entertainment, and local news (Norman, "Television and Statistics").
Bias in television should not come as a surprise since bias has been clearly evident in earlier types of reporting such as newspaper, radio, and even word of mouth. Nevertheless, network bias has impacted the United States in numerous ways including perhaps most importantly in the presidential elections. When tuning in to a news channel a viewer that sees a story on CNN (Cable News Network) will generally not get the same story if they had tuned in to FNC (Fox News Channel). In studies conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2012, statistics showed that the CNN audience was nearly 3-1 Democrat while FNC had nearly 3-1 Republican viewership ("In changing news landscapes, Even television is vulnerable"). Specific television hosts such as Rachel Maddow and Hannity seemed to draw the highest ratios and bias. In the 2012 Election and practically all of the last few elections critics from both sides have cried out that media bias is swaying voters into voting a certain way. Local TV remains the premiere choice for campaign media strategists as Presidential spending on local broadcast TV stations in 2012 (from the conventions to Election Day) grew dramatically versus 2008, increasing over 65% to nearly $500 million. The most recent survey has found faith in news media at an near all time low with only 23% of Americans saying that they trust news media (Bidwell). However, this begs a question; if media is biased each way then is media truly affecting the votes as strongly as some believe? Political and news reporting bias is not the only bias on television. Advertisements are of course meant to promote a product or service and seeing that a certain company could sponsor a show there can be a good degree of bias toward that product (or against an opponent's product). Before TV, there were radio commercials and signs in stores, but that's nothing compared to the bright, colorful and loud bombardment of television commercials every few minutes. Not only do we see products advertised directly, but we also see characters using them. Bias can also be found on television shows themselves, which can often be used to promote a social belief or movement. More often, though shows are accused of promoting an agenda when really the hecklers are just opposite in belief to what the television show portrays. Recent shows that have come under fire from this include the hit show Glee which has been criticized for promoting in the words of some conservative critics "the wussification of American children" (through the promotion of anti-bullying and the positive stigma around glee club in the case of Glee) as well as the promoted acceptance of many anti-conservative values (McFedries). However, as in most cases critics really do not hold too much power as these shows continue to garner hit ratings.
The American Work Ethic has been heavily criticized in the recent decades and many people draw conclusions between the amount of television watched by an individual and the work ethic of that individual. Considering the amount of time it takes to hold a job or schooling, the average time per day an American watches television, and the other necessities of the day (sleep, eating, bathing) it is easy to see that television does battle for time against jobs and other positive activities like working out, hanging with friends, or spending time with family. Due to the lack of studies available on the subject of work ethic, one can only opinionate. On the other hand, studies have been plentiful on a somewhat related subject and that is obesity & television. Looking at the numerous studies, a majority seems to have found that television does have a negative impact on health especially that of obesity. Conclusions have also been drawn stating the amounts of time spent watching TV can even surpass the health effects of physical activity and nutrition (Hancox et Fulton). Some Pediatricians have even gone as far as to recommended cutting television altogether during some early stages in childhood development (Hancox et Fulton).
Television may possibly be the biggest influence ever to affect America but not all of that impact happened directly. The Television set the path for a plethora of other inventions like the cell phone, videos, gaming systems, tablets, and so many more items that make up such a large part of American culture today. What would American life be like had television never been invented? Well had the television not been invented than one can take away the computer, cell phone, videogames, and DVD'S. In other words, television itself was the beginning of an entire technological revolution that rivals and perhaps surpasses any other invention-based revolution that America has ever seen.
Another heavily discussed aspect of the television is the effect that it has on family life. This is a complicated issue because there are many positive and likewise many negative effects. One study found that television and video games lessened stress, helped self-esteem, and led to a better overall emotional health but also attributed to obesity and antisocial behavior (Rose). Another study found that if television is watched in large amounts by children than the chances of antisocial behavior like lack of friends, poor attention span, lack of empathy, chances of becoming a bully, or even later on in life committing major crimes such as theft and murder increase (Shrum). One study also found that television could shorten life by about 4 to 5 years (Rourke). Television may also play a role especially among teens and young adult in weight disorders like anorexia and bulimia. TV shows marketed toward teens often use model teens that are very skinny, very attractive, and that seem to have a perfect or at least better life. This can often make the viewer feel inadequate and may cause them to take drastic measures such as the above disorders. Of course, moderation does seem to be the key in these studies as positive effects are often seen when a family gathers to watch a television favorite. Content is also thought to be a main factor in these results.
Every day interaction is greatly affected by television. The talk of the times is almost always connected to television. This is also known as the "Water cooler Effect." Every time something big happens on television whether it is a crisis, TV series, scandal, weather report, or sports event it is often the most talked about topic at school, work, or other communication hotspots. Miley Cyrus has been mentioned nearly every ten minutes since the VMA's. When January and February come around, the Super Bowl is often talked about by the American masses. A new season of a television show is often discussed in a classroom; television triggers the primal social instinct that humans have. Both work and school schedules are often influenced by big sports events such as Olympics or championships in other sports. In addition, Television has expanded career fields and learning in school with the additions of so many jobs in the ever-expanding television related field.
Television has shaped the past and is shaping the present but the future of the television holds major impacts it seems as well. New prototype inventions like Google Glass, Oculus Rift, Argus II, Atlas Robot, and Bounce Imaging Explorer which are hybrids of the computer, television, and Smartphone hold interesting concepts for the future. The Smartwatch is another new invention that could be the gateway into the future of television. The Smart TV's have kept television itself directly in the technology race allowing voice activation, apps, internet access, multiple channels to be streamed at the same time, and other more phone and computer like capabilities.
The television has changed so much in just a few decades. The impacts of the television can be felt in nearly every aspect of American life these days. Television is a teacher, a parent, a friend, and a hero to many and yet also a villain, a convict and a killer to others. Television teaches children to learn about their ABC'S and yet also how one can kill or carry out crimes. Television decides what is normal in society and has often held the most power in deciding what is and what is not acceptable in society in subjects ranging from social issues to violence and sex. Television has affected major events like the Super Bowl and presidential debates by reaching mass audiences. Bias has also invaded television especially in the news networks but also in things as simple as advertisements. The news and advertisements that are broadcasted influence beliefs in everything from favorite restaurant to political affiliations. News and up to date information is no longer a daily or hourly event instead news in some form is broadcasted 24/7. Work ethic, Obesity, and social nature have all been affected by televisions influence. New fields of technology like much of the video game industry, DVDs, cell phones, and the computer all show televisions indirect influence on life. Television shapes, schedules, and influences what the talks of the times are in sports, shows, scandals, celebs, and news. Television's effects are not limited to the past and present, as the future also seems promising with new inventions like Google glass, Smart watches, and new generations in television itself. There are very few inventions that have had the ability to influence an entire generation, but the television has gone far and above that, influencing every single generation since its unveiling and showing few signs of slowing down. It takes very little trepidation to call the television the most important invention in American History.
Cite this page
How Media And Television Has Influenced a Generation. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
An Analysis of the Bias Coverage on the War against Terrorism by the Media
Media Checking Proposition: Prejudice on the War on Terrorism
For this assignment on media tracking I am focusing on the predisposition shown in concerns to exactly how the battle on terrorism covered in various news electrical outlets. The first signs of this were after September 11th when Bush proclaimed a war on terrorism. This led to a terrible uproar versus Muslims as well as other developing nation due to a worry induced stereotype. Currently, the Syrian war has the media under wraps with dangers from many terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS etc. This began in 2011 in Arab Springs, where nationwide protests against President Bashar al-Assad and also his federal government sparked, this was responded to with violent suppressions and at some point brought about a revolutionary war. 5 years later on, the dispute is spread between 4 various groups struggling for power, all with different international backers. After Obama got associated with the battle and also sent soldiers and also funds right into Afghanistan and Iran, points promptly intensified in the media.
Through viewing how the stories are depicted by information sites like CNN, or FOX News, I came to the fast realization that the media insurance coverage is very biased on this circumstance. CNN is very guilty of media predisposition on terrorism. When considering also the short article titles such as, Brussels terrorists 'intended to strike France' written merely weeks ago, the predisposition is virtually strangely noticeable. Going back to the Boston battles, the media electrical outlets have concentrated heavily on the injuries and casualties our side has dealt with. "Two bombs struck near the goal of the Boston Marathon on Monday, transforming an event right into a bloody scene of destruction" (Levs). When talking about the terrorist attack, CNN's coverage represented the large number of people harmed and the seriousness of their injuries in deepness. While this is the desired suggestion behind information coverage, we frequently fail to remember that while terrorists have been making strikes such as the Boston bombing, or the strikes on France and also Brussels, we've had an incredible impact on the casualties of civilians in the third world countries that we've attacked.
When searching for write-ups relating to the atrocities done to American's by terroristic attacks, there is no lack of articles. "Jason Rezaian has actually been convicted by a Revolutionary Court in Iran ... confronting 20 years ... been suffering in a Tehran jail for more than a year" (Martinez). This short article is just one example out of lots of posts relating to the ferocity of the treatment of Americans in third world countries. This particular short article goes much more right into deepness of 4 Americans that are either apprehended or missing in Iran. This has sustained the worry of terrorism among Americans, showing us to be afraid and also separate ourselves with individuals of Muslim heritage. One post estimates a marine expert in a message sent to the United States federal government describing " admissions obtained by force, hazards, unpleasant prison problems and also prolonged durations of solitary confinement" (Berlinger). Upon hearing this the media sprung on the possibility, pouring out short articles on the harsh problems and therapies Americans are confronted with in Iran. Nonetheless, when researching articles on the quantity of casualties caused by American troops in Iran, it is nearly difficult to locate a strong number..
The U.S. armed force is responsible for the fatality of thousands of thousands of civilians in Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan, the information media just seems to disregard to it. Revolutionary and also civil wars can't happen without the fatalities of private citizens, and also when it's the fatality of American civilians the media covers it from every angle feasible, "the jury saw bombs explode and individuals tear apart ... roads sprinkled crimson with blood as well as littered with severed limbs as well as body parts" (O'Neil). The write-ups covered terroristic strikes focus on only one thing, how many innocent are eliminated by terrorists, several do not appear to have any type of focus on the affect American soldiers have actually had on civilians in these countries. While it's secure to say the acts of terrorism are straight, intentional strikes on civilians, the effects of the tools made use of and the shooting made use of by American soldiers has had an astonishing affect on the variety of private casualties in the Syrian battle. An article published in early January describes qualities that were not common knowledge regarding the conditions of the war in Syria, however these also lean greatly on exactly how horrible the terrorists are treating Americans, "captives were defeated and also tortured, and also undertook a simulated execution" (Chun).
The injustice put on Islam by the media covering the war on terrorism positions a severely biased sight on Iran as well as Islamic states. Media bias has harmed the source of the revolutionary war not just by falling short to report the damage done to Islam by the intrusion of U.S. soldiers but also of the assaults performed in other areas of the globe that do not straight influence the U.S. and also as a result in the eyes of the media, aren't big sufficient to matter. Harry Smith has actually been estimated saying, "There was a range of assaults that occurred week after week after week after week after week. As well as until it came down on our front doorstep, with our old friend, Paris, then we go 'Oh my God'. Right? It had actually taken place in Turkey. It took place in Lebanon in the days before. Frequently" (Smith). Without us realizing it, the media has actually produced a strong prejudice on the war on fear. When they feel it would be the most appropriate to what they desire their viewers to believe, just reporting what as well as.
Every news channel is prejudice somehow. Whether it is more liberal or traditional, the stories reported will always be a little predisposition one method or the other relying on the issue. Nevertheless, one topic every one of them are exceptionally prejudice towards is the war on fear. While terrorism is a significant concern and the media's records maintain us as much as day with the battle on Syria, they always take care of to leave out crucial details on the negative influence our nation has. Along with all of this, the media likewise covers Trump's governmental campaign, in which he presses his severe adverse sights towards Muslims on the American country. With the support of Trump followers and also the bias in the media, the country has ended up being extremely educated to see the unfavorable effects we have to face without thinking about just how we've triggered unfavorable impacts. While American troops are no terrorists, it is essential to remember that during the Syrian battle as well as also prior to that, America has actually created hefty casualties on the Islamic states. Not just on the terrorist teams they're focused on, however additionally the civilians who occur to populate the surrounding area. No person can argue that the present political stand point in Syria is the straight reason for all these casualties. Nonetheless, news sites like CNN have taken advantage of the American country on big ranges, stopping working to report the tragedies triggered by American troops in Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Works Cited
- Chun, Susan. "6 Things You Didn't Know about the Iran Hostage Crisis." CNN. 16 Jan. 2016. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.
- Cooper, Aaron, Anne O'Neil, and Ray Sanchez. "Boston Marathon Bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Gets Death." CNN. Cable News Network. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.
- Levs, Josh, and Monte Plott. "Boy, 8, One of 3 Killed in Bombings at Boston Marathon; Scores Wounded." CNN. Cable News Network, 18 Apr. 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.
- Martinez, Michael. "Who Are Americans Detained, Missing in Iran?" CNN. Cable News Network, 12 Oct. 2015. Web. 14 Apr. 2016
- O'Neil, Anne. "Timeline: Boston Bombings, Manhunt, Aftermath." CNN. Cable News Network. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.
- O'Neil, Anne. "Tsarnaev Guilty of All 30 Counts in Boston Bombing." CNN. Cable News Network. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.
- Willis, Egberto. "Journalist Admits Media Bias in Their Coverage of Terrorist Attacks." CNN. Cable News Network. Web. 14 Apr. 2016.
Cite this page
An Analysis of the Bias Coverage on the War against Terrorism by the Media. (2022, Dec 08).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2022/12/page/6/
