Prisonization and Prison Subcultures

Prisonization and Prison Subcultures

The interactions between inmates within a prison, and the behaviors thereof, has always held a special level of interest to psychologists. Sure, institutions are developed such that there are set strict rules to provide structure to the inmates. From limited access to the outdoors or cafeteria, to which jobs which inmates can have, the rules should be the end-all be-all for residents of the institution. However, there is one set of rules and expectations that is even more valued than those set forth by correctional officers.

Though there is some debate about how and why it is developed, most prisons have an unwritten and informal, however desperately important, prison code. How inmates adopt these unwritten rules and the behaviors required by them is referred to as prisonization. Prisonization and the prison subculture developed as a result have piqued the interest of many psychologists within the past 80 or so years, yielding an extensive amount of research and two prevailing theories as to why this happens.

The first theory that describes why a prison code would develop and why inmates would prisonize to the code even if they were processed post-code-formation is the deprivation theory. This theory holds that inmates are generally all fairly affected by the depriving nature of the rules and conditions of prisons. A prison code, then, is formed to cope with the lack of liberty, autonomy, security, goods and services, and heterosexual relationships.

In some ways, this is a genius coping mechanism, in which humans in adverse conditions develop their own set of rules to understand their unique situation. It forces inmates to solve problems collectively and develop a society amongst themselves. The prevailing idea as to why this happens is that prison changes people, and their behavior is a direct effect of the fact that they have been put in prison.

The second theory as to why prisonization occurs is a criticism of the deprivation theory. Understanding that not every inmate becomes highly prisonized, the importation theory maintains that inmates are more or less themselves within a prison, and they do not have to alter their behavior to adopt the code. In fact, their receptivity and willingness to adapt to the code is shaped by how the inmates were socialized before they ever came to prison.

This means that age, race, religion, gender, socioeconomic status, criminal records, and even attitudes towards the legal system on the whole, can all affect how well an inmate will prisonize. Instead of holding to the idea that inmates are changed by prison, the importation theory holds that who you are in prison is a reflection of who you are in other scenarios, but prison cannot make you a different person.

In my opinion, prisonization is actually a result of both theories. While some inmates may be processed into a prison with a violent record or a desire to be at the top of the food chain, others will follow along with the rules simply to survive. Prison can change people and make them act in ways that they have never imagined they would have, but some people fully embrace themselves and their internal natures in prison. Both are valid arguments, which lead to the same end. In that case, the reason for which some inmates prisonize differently than others is because they could be experiencing the prisonization process differently.

It's either eat or be eaten, or strictly a method of survival.
No matter how they come about, prison codes hold a great level of influence over the inmates in a prison. There are expectations for behavior, who certain individuals can talk to, how one is expected to treat a correctional officer, and an acceptance of homosexual relationships between inmates which could have otherwise been frowned open in general society. Furthermore, these social rules can lead to intense feelings of loyalty to certain leaders of prison society, and even the development of gangs within the prison. Prison codes also yield their own economy, generally based on what is offered in the commissary.

In the past, many prisons held an economic system based on cigarettes, as they held their value for long periods of time, and had different denominations (single, pack, carton) within the system. The value that each denomination had was largely based on those higher up in the societal chain, who could determine how much a cigarette was worth. This system was obviously not put into place by correctional officers or other prison officials, but was legitimate nonetheless.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Prisonization and Prison Subcultures. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Some Strange and Melancholy Way

“We know only that in some strange and melancholy way we have become a wasteland.”It is common knowledge that war is physically destructive and treacherous. It is common knowledge that soldiers all around the world perish daily. In Erich Maria Remarque’s novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, a new aspect of war is introduced. What lies after combat, death, and loss is most tragic of all; life after the war. This historic war novel takes place during The Great War, World War I. German Soldier, Paul Bäumer, narrates from his standpoint as he enters the war as an eager eighteen-year-old.

Throughout the story, he experiences a profound bond with his comrades, a bond broken only by death itself. Although Paul does not live to return home to his family, read his books again, nor pursue his dreams prior to the war, he has already been desecrated by the image of fallen friends and even enemies. Surviving the terrors of war does not set soldiers free, but makes them as unlucky as their fallen brothers. Shockingly, one of the most unsettling worries for the young soldiers was returning home after the war. Paul, along with his comrades, was rushed into combat at an early stage in his life.

When comparing his life to older soldiers, Paul expresses, “...for the generation that grew up before us, though it has passed these years with us here, already had a home and a calling; now it can return to its old occupations, and the war will be forgotten” (294). Due to the men joining the army right after they finished high school, they did not have time, nor the opportunity to begin life outside of education, as the older generation did. Instead of starting a family, continuing school, or finding a steady job, the men are rushed off into combat.

Without a previous life before the war, the men notably have nothing to look forward to. The war becomes their life, the only life they have ever known. Therefore, when they return from the fiery of the fronts, they find themselves more alone than ever before. Another way war destroys minds is through the death of a fellow comrade. The everlasting bond between soldiers is described best by Paul when he declares, “They are more to me than life, these voices, they are more than motherliness and more than fear; they are the strongest, most comforting thing there is anywhere: they are the voices of my comrades” (212).

Death can tear people apart; death can also bring people closer. In All Quiet on the Western Front, the soldiers, despite the suffering and loss, develop an unbreakable bond. Whether it is the brutal training with Corporal Himmelstoss, a ruthless man who trains the soldiers, or the terrors of machine guns, grenades, and poison gas, the men are with each other through everything. In fact, they are all each other have. This bond can be both key to survival and keeping sanity but it can also be deadly. When a fellow comrade perishes in battle, the men lose a brother, best friend, and soldier all at once. War is not solely about surviving, it is about surviving with others. A soldier's mind, much like Paul’s when he loses Kat, his best friend, is forever damaged. No medicine nor time away from war can heal a soldier’s memory, no medicine nor time can heal a soldier’s mind. Not only are soldiers harmed by the death of comrades, but they are also slowly damaged by how normal death becomes. Death on the battlefield is inevitable, and in a sense, normal.

An orderly tending to Kemmerich’s fatal leg amputation reports, “...today alone there have been sixteen deaths- yours is the seventeenth. There will probably be twenty altogether” (32). In the midst of war, numbers replace lives. For every life lost, a number is added to a chart. Kemmerich was a comrade and friend to Paul’s squad. To the orderly, he was no more than the seventeenth death of the day. Perhaps it is easier for the men to cope with loss when death is habitual. However, it is not until after the war when each number is replaced with a life, an innocent and promising life. Dehumanization benefits the soldiers during the war when they need to barricade loss. Unfortunately, years after the war when men need it the least, dehumanization seizes one’s thoughts and holds them accountable for every life, every number, every man.

Those who consider themselves lucky for surviving war are truly fortunate. Not all soldiers have the belief to say surviving was lucky. Men find themselves lost with no life to return to post-war; war is their life and will continue to be. They find themselves struggling to cope with the loss of fallen brothers, and although they perished years ago, are still a vivid image in the veteran’s mind. Emotional disconnection paves the way for a ruinous impact on the soldier’s life. Slowly, and then all at once, without warning or guidance, every casualty visits the mind of a soldier. All Quiet on the Western Front explores bonds between comrades while giving insight into the effects on the soldier’s mental health. Remarque’s novel proves people can be destroyed by death before they are physically killed by death.   

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Some Strange And Melancholy Way. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Author Paints the Picture

In the book, All Quiet on the western front. The author paints the picture of a young serviceman named Paul Baumer and a few of his friends that enroll into the German army full of patriotism and pride but are unaware of the effects that World War One will have on them.

For Paul Baumer and his friends, it doesn't take them long to realize what they've gotten themselves into. After a two-week stint on the battlefront, Paul and his army company only made it back to base with eighty out of the one hundred and fifty men that they started with after being attacked on the last day of their mission. It all began to go downhill for Paul and his friends from there, after losing one of their friends (Joseph Behm) early on in the war to a gunshot wound to the eye.

They begin to grow hatred for their old schoolmaster Kantorek, as they feel that he was the one who guided and pressured them into joining the army and now they're having to go through the scary transition from school to war at nineteen years old. But they couldn't put all the blame on Kantorek for their pledge to join the army. It was mainly due to the massive outbreak of nationalism going on at the time where young men felt pressured into joining the army or else being somewhat excluded from society if they didn't join.

A little later on in the book, Paul begins to explain that for all the young serviceman that joined the army including himself that it feels as if their lives have been cut off from them because they were just beginning the best times of their life. And goes on to say that at least the older men who are in the army have wives, families, jobs to look forward to if they make it back home alive. At this point, the war has taken control of the young soldiers' minds mentally, making them question what the end may be since they feel they don't have much to live for besides going back home to their parents.

To these soldiers, this war is not for them. Meaning that they feel like there shouldn't even be any armies in the first place. Kat, one of Paul's friends, even said: Give'em all the same grub and all the same pay and the war would be over and done in a day (Remarque 41). And Kropp, on the other hand, believes that a declaration war should be a popular festival where the ministers and generals of the two countries fight it out with clubs dressed in their underwear.

As the men got together to discuss what life will be like after the war is over. Albert went on to say that The war has ruined us for everything (Remarque 87). For Paul and all of his friends that are around the same age, they are confused and are lost with the fact that they have no idea what's to come for them in the future if this war is ever over.

After the long vigorous battle with the French in the trenches, Paul is starting to feel sorrow as he realizes the toll that this war has put not only on him but his friends. And that his life before the war and his desires for the future will never come true now because his life has been ruined by the trenches. While this war in the trenches was coming to an end, Paul is now all alone as he is the only one still alive out of his comrades from his platoon. From the start, these young men knew that the horrors of this war were going to take over their lives. Both mentally and physically.

In this novel, the author portrayed a group of the young serviceman that joined the German army at the age of nineteen and were thrown into a war that they didn't want it any part of. But decided to join the army due to the pressure from the rise of nationalism in the country and from their schoolmaster. Throughout their battles in the trenches, Paul and his friends feel as if they lost everything that they once had and the world that they were once living in before they joined the army is gone as well.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Author Paints The Picture. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Told by Erich Maria Remarque

Based on the story told by Erich Maria Remarque, the stories about the war then eventually being in the war ruined these soldier's life before they even died. The major them that can be found in the book is brutality. Those events are praised out throughout the book. The novel centers on a young German soldier, Paul Bume and his experiences throughout a period of World War I. One of the major themes found in the novel was the difficulty for the soldiers to revert to their civilian life after having experienced extreme combat during the war. One of the quote told by the author refers to how these man's lives were drastically change, and even those who survived the war were still affected by it (2).

This internal comment made by Paul B?¤ume the main character of the novel, entirely explained how each of his fellow classmates, friends, and soldier left about them being in the war.Nationalism can be defined in many ways, however, in this book the author refers to nationalism as belonging or even loyalty. At the Beginning of the novel, we read that Paul Baumer and his classmates had volunteered to enlist in the war. However, what really happened was Their schoolmaster Kantorek, their parents filled their head with lies which glorified the war. During those time, not enlisting in the war would be cowardly, sort of like you were Turing your back on those who need you the most, your country.We believe in such things no longer, we believe in the war. (42) all their life goal changed their aspiration and desire to become somebody, or even find somebody.

This novel sets out to enfaces war as it was experienced, replacing the romantic picture of glory placed by their parents and teacher with a decidedly unromantic vision of fear, meaninglessness, and butchery which was, in fact, the reality. Paul B?¤ume is the main character of the novel. Throughout the novel, he is forced to mature for his safety, which eventually deeply affected him as a person.The author refers to Paul and his friends as the lost generation. Young men who went straight out of school into the war. There were many incidents, killing, sickness and many lives were lost.

As a result, Paul like many others learned to detached themselves completely in order to stay san and survive. One quote that stood out to me while referring to the struggles they faced during the war was Paul statement regarding his friend Albert Kropp. He says, witnessing his friend death was devastating, but after seen death all around you get used to it (128). Because All Quiet on the Western Front is set among soldiers fighting on the front, one of its main focuses is the ruinous effect that war has on the soldiers who fought it.At some point, Paul said that because of all they seen, done they aren't young kids anymore (42). To me this kind of fell like out of the blue the world had stop and suddenly all they knew about the world and themselves had to change, they were no longer just eighteen years old but they were soldiers. The irony is that they consider themselves adults because of their experiences rather than youths.As time go on and Paul returned home, he was incapable to image his life without the war.

Even his mom who he was close with didn't feel as connected to him anymore he became incapable to speak with her. He also found that he didn't belong anymore even though the town hadn't change. He even states that he feels he doesn't belong anywhere anymore (79). Paul continue saying that at his age twenty years old, yet he doesn't know anything about life (125) This quote stood out to me because it summed up what the impact the war left on the soldier, although some lived they were dying inside. All they knew after the war was, violence, fear, and despair. At time Paul also felt frustrated with his father, he often asked questioned about his time during war. He's answer would always be that you can't talk about such things.

This quote told by Paul's comrade to felt applied to everyone. now as time had went on he realized that Paul was just like him (106) I think at time we as individual or even the society we need in today pressure's individual to participant in all sorts of activities they otherwise wouldn't. this could be gangs, bullying, theft, or perhaps even murder or assault. But in the end, I think we realize that those people we pressure are just people like us and we could also be them.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Told By Erich Maria Remarque. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Famous Serial Killer: Jack the Ripper

On the streets of one of London's poorest and most crime-ridden cities, Jack the Ripper, also known as the white chapel murders, who's identity still remains unclear, managed to expose Victorian society, and in doing so, taught citizens to become more aware of their surroundings and their appalling social conditions. The crimes made by famous serial killer, Jack the Ripper, had a huge impact in the slums of London and society as a whole.

        Five dead women later, Jack's reign of terror lasted 12 weeks, which later gave him the title of world's famous serial killer. The strangest part is to this day it is still unclear who Jack the Ripper actually was, there is no known information about him, not even a name. Thanks to the daily newspaper at the time Jack the Ripper got more coverage than he probably deserved, which was his goal all along, and effectively became a menacing media figure.

        His name, Jack the Ripper, first appeared as the signature on a letter sent to head of London news at the end of September. This name turned five deadly murders, also known as the five canonical victims, into a worldwide phenomenon and of launching the unknown evildoer who was responsible for the crimes into the land of a legend.

        While Jack got the attention he craved for his victims weren't so lucky, it is known that during his murder spree his victims only consisted of women, who particularly those who were known for prostitution, which at the time seemed to be easy targets, and was legal as long as it didn't disturb the public. The ripper seized women by their throats and strangled them to death, and usually took a piece of the victims viscera, equivalent to a trophy. His first victim was unfortunate enough to have her abdomen carved open and intestines partly dragged out.  It is made to believe the killer had some anatomical knowledge so many suggested he was a doctor of some sort and also had experience with a knife.

Serial killers are often either classified as sociopaths or psychopaths. It is known that psychopaths suffer from mental chronic disorders and often have violent tendencies, while sociopaths form personality disorders that exhibit severe attitudes and behaviors. So the question remains; was Jack the Ripper a sociopath or psychopath?

        Sociopaths usually end up the way they are due to a traumatic childhood. Jack the Ripper was known to be a sociopath because of the concentrated murders and mutilation of the women's bodies. The witty letters written written to the newspaper also suggest he felt no remorse for what he did and might have even enjoyed it.

        Sociopaths are known to be manipulative, lack empathy, often lie, and have a weak conscience that drives them to act out in an aggressive manner or act recklessly, even when they understand what they're doing is wrong. Those diagnosed with the antisocial personality disorder come off as disturbed, but they can also show signs of caring, trustworthiness, and sincerity, but don't let that fool you, sociopaths are known to do anything to get what they want.

        Many people believe most sociopaths are only known to be dangerous crazy serial killers, but that remains a myth, your parents, boss, or friend could be sociopath. They make it plain and simple to see they lack empathy and care for no one else but their self, they also make excuses for their actions and often blame others. It is a known fact 1 in 25 people are sociopaths, which could be any of you in this room. Despite what researchers say, this internal disconnect may be masked by a charming demeanor, so being aware of who you decide to become friends with is crucial for your own mental health.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Famous Serial Killer: Jack the Ripper. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Persona of Jack the Ripper

In 1888, in White Chapel London, there were five prostitutes that were brutally murdered by a person known as Jack the Ripper. He was of the most infamous killers globally and was believed to be a butcher or even a doctor since he had such anatomical knowledge (Simon 38) Throughout the years it had become a sensation to solve the murder case, and some have believed this person to have been H.H. Holmes. Holmes was the first serial killer in America in 1889; he was known for skinning and dissecting his victims before tossing them in acid. Some believe he killed nearly 200 people, but he had only confessed to killing twenty-seven. They both had targeted women and the similarities between the two are shocking. They had similar handwriting, both show experience medically with the way they sliced through their victims, and they both where familiar with Whitechapel, London. With these similarities it seems to be possible that the two could be the same person. Holmes was caught in 1895 and then sentenced to death by hanging. Holmes great-great-great grandson dedicated himself to prove that he was in fact the true Jack the Ripper. Throughout the decades the mystery of knowing who Jack the Ripper is, some have come to the conclusion that the possibility of H.H. Holmes being Jack himself, and the evidence is hard to disagree with.

Back in 1888, there was no way to test DNA or to check fingerprints. Handwriting is as unique as a finger print, everyone's is different, and specialists can compare writings to determine who a person is. Examiners assess overall forms, line features, margins and format, as well as content. With over 5,000 different personality traits and the way people dot their i's and cross their t's, it can real what kinds of a person they are.  In one source it says, Mr. Mudgett has submitted handwriting samples from both Holmes and Jack the Ripper for review, and experts have confirmed the likelihood they could be the same person (Burford 3). The Dear Boss letter from Jack the Ripper was compared to the journals of H.H. Holmes and there was a 97.97% chance they were written in the same hand (Sanza 3).

Many researchers have argued that Jack the Ripper could have had medical experience due to the way he opened his victims and exposed their organs. The women that were murdered were disemboweled and organs taken from the body. Precise incisions were made to extract certain organs. Cristine Sanza goes on to tell that Jack the Ripper murdered Annie Chapman only to take her womb, and the police believe he only could have done that with anatomical knowledge. H.H. Holmes finished college with a medical degree. Holmes on the other hand did have the skills, He was an intelligent, articulate man and a qualified chemist who graduated with a medical degree from the University of Michigan in 1884 (Burford 2). Understanding that both could possibly had similar medical knowledge leads us closer to believing Holmes could have been Jack the Ripper.

Jack the Ripper murdered five prostitutes in Whitechapel, London, and H. H. Holmes was a regular there as well. In one article about the comparison of Jack the Ripper and H.H. Holmes, Sanza discusses how they both relate to Whitechapel, London:

Jack the Ripper's hunting ground was the Whitechapel neighborhood of London. H.H.       Holmes also had a connection to Whitechapel. His friend from the University of        Michigan, Edmund Buckley, came from a wealthy Whitechapel family. Buckley and        Holmes were partners-in-crime; they ran insurance scams and often sold corpses to        medical facilities, not an uncommon way to make money in the 1800s.

According to census records, Holmes had a residence in Whitechapel. After he tried to        sell a corpse to a local hospital, a formal complaint was filed against him. These records        place him in the Whitechapel area around the time of the Ripper murders. Was he doing        more than just his usual corpse-peddling? (4)

They both where in the same place at the same time, and could have very well been H. H. Holmes disfiguring the prostitutes and taking their organs for profit as well.

        Mary Kelly was the fifth victim of the canonical five, and she was the worst mutilated out of them all. She is the one that brought the town together with sadness and remorse. She was beyond disfigured, skinned, and disemboweled with many organs taken out set around her. As Timothy Verhoeven stated in his article, policed needed the help and called Dr. Thomas Bond to do an autopsy. As he looked her over, he also provided psychological profile of the killer. Verhoeven states that Bond thought he was a quiet, inoffensive man looking man, and neatly respectably dressed (25).  With H.H. Holmes having multiple properties, such as his hotel in Chicago and his property he had in Whitechapel, and a great education we could guess he dressed properly and looked like anyone else on the streets, or maybe with more class. Could Bond have been talking about Holmes?

In other opinions, Jack the Ripper could have been anyone. Everyone had their own thoughts about the one who got away. Some have believed that he was a butcher, medical student, or even a woman. In the article of Kirkis Reviews, they state, Since Jack the Ripper was never caught or identified... his continuing prominence in popular culture is discussed, as is the work of Ripperologists,' amateur detectives devoted to finding out the murderer's true identity (1).  According to Michael Conner, he believed Jack the Ripper could have been a working-class man. He believed the prostitutes were out in early mornings to early money from men as they were heading to work. Connor had a man in mind, This man, Charles Lechmere, could have been a murderer who hid in plain view (77). Lechmere was said to be standing by Mary Ann Nichols as she was dead, and a passerby come along and Lechmere told him to come look at the body. It is said that Lechmere gave a false name of Charles Allen Cross, it was not until 2007 that his surname was Lechmere (Connor 77).

 David Goldman states that a Famed FBI profiler, John Douglas agrees the theory that Jack the Ripper was actually already caught and was not able to be tried due to being crazy. He wrote that the Victorian times were very rough.  Slaughter houses filled the streets with blood, half of the children were dying before their fifth birthday, houses where packed together, and jobs were hard to come, therefore women started to prostitute to help with money. Fingers where pointed towards the Eastern European immigrants since a true Englishman could not do such crimes. Instead, angry mobs chased immigrants in anger. In 1888, police did not have the technology they needed to catch a villain, and the only way for police to catch a criminal was to catch them in the act or to have an eye witness (24). Goldman gets deeper information on who he thinks the killer could be: 

Crime historian Martin Fido writes that the police did catch the killer, but that he was        found to be insane and could not be tried. Based on asylum records from the period, he        names Polish immigrant David Cohen as the most credible suspect. Famed FBI profiler        John Douglas generally agrees, and feels that after the last, vision attack no rational        person could have continued functioning. (24)

Goldman thought of the Ripper had went a different way and that just shows everyone has their own opinions.

There are many theories of who Jack the Ripper is.  This is a big case that many people are eager to solve. H.H. Holmes is a good theory to compare to the Ripper. They both have done horrific crimes, and the similarities between the two seem pretty convincing to show they are one. Many people have their own opinions on the situation and the possibilities are endless. With All these different theories, H.H Holmes makes the most since. Their writings closely matched by professionals is very hard to oppose to. Holmes was in the medical field and Jack the Ripper made such precise incisions to extract certain organs makes us believe he as well was medical inclined. What are the odds of both Holmes and Jack the Ripper being in Whitechapel, London at the same time? Sanza goes deeper with deatail in Holmes wasn't even in Chicago at the time of the Whitechapel killings:

We know that H.H. Holmes purchased the land to build his Chicago Murder Castle in        July 1888. It may seem unlikely that Holmes would travel to London immediately        afterwards, but construction on his castle did not begin until the spring if 1889. In fact,        there was no record of him in Chicago at all that winter. Perhaps Holmes took a winter        holiday in London to get an early start on his killing spree? (5)

Getting a head start on his killings does seem possible especially since he already been around there before. With Jack the Ripper and H.H Holmes having so much in common it does seem possible the two are one. The evidence is hard to not notice. Jack the Ripper has murdered prostitutes that were out to earn money and many of the victims of H.H Holmes were women and children. These horrific crimes are beyond disturbing and the fact they happened is beyond saddening. Everyone has their different theory on who Jack the Ripper is, and all are very reasonable theories. H.H. Holmes just seems to fit the description a bit closer than the rest do. Even with the many possibilities these men have done horrible things in this world.

Works Cited

  1. Burford, Rachael. Was America's first serial killer HH Holmes also Jack the Ripper'" Daily Mail Online, 25 July 2017.
  2. Connor, Michael. The Strange Case of Jack the Ripper. Quadrant Magazine, vol. 54, no. 3, 2010, p. 76.
  3. Goldman, David. The Monster of Whitechapel: The Continuing Mystery of Jack the Ripper. Biography, vol. 5, no. 10, Oct. 2001, p. 24
  4. Jack the Ripper. Kirkus Reviews, vol. 85, no. 12, June 2017, p. 1. EBSCOhost, libproxy.ivytech.edu
  5. Sanza, Cristina. 7 Reasons Why H.H. Holmes And Jack the Ripper Could Be The Same Person. Ranker, 2018, www.ranker.com/list/theories-h-h-holmes-and-jack-the-ripper-were-the-        same-person/cristina-sanza
  6. .Simon, Gabriella. "The Traits and the Thrill of Serial Killers." Internal Security 7.2 (2015): 33-42. ProQuest.  Accessed 20 Oct. 2018.
  7. Verhoeven, Timothy. "Pathologizing Male Desire: Satyriasis, Masculinity, and Modern  Civilization at the Fin De Sicle." Journal of the History of Sexuality 24.1 (2015): 25-45.        Accessed 20 Oct. 2018.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A Persona Of Jack the Ripper. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Understanding the Internationalization Concept

The purpose of this research is understanding the internationalization concept and highlighting the challenges and opportunities for business internationalization in the Sudanese market; taking Aptech Computer Education as a case study. 

To begin with, there are several factors that affect business internationalization; such as governments, country economy and product acceptancy. For example, governments and their political relation with one another defiantly affect the economic relationship between the them; even companies get affected. Apple for instance made many changes and used a powerful strategic plan to make it number two worldwide; however, it is not number one since certain countries have embargo and are restricted from downloading with iTunes; they cannot access the app store fully. No doubt that has a negative impact on Apple's sales and total market outreach. Therefore, eliminating or overcoming such barrier is crucial for businesses to prosper.

On the other hand, the economic cycle of the country; whether it's in its early recession, full recession, early recovery or late recovery; where each state in this cycle influences the international trade differently. Another factor is the demand on the product and its acceptancy; in order to succeed, determining the common products requested by international trade or could be accepted internationally is crucial before entering a foreign market.

In order to understand internationalization, it is pivotal to understand the terms that comes with it; localization and globalization. While internationalization means the process of enterprises to enter an international market, globalization is the process by which businesses or organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale. On the other hand, localization is the exact opposite, where an enterprise for instance, be located or fixed in a country. These interrelated terms are the key to establishing new strategies for international business. Localization plays a big part of internalization.  For a company to be able to do business on an international scale it must have a stable local market. Many factors go in to a stable local market i.e. bank stability government stability and culture acceptance. In order for one to move forward it business wise the country must have a stable economy with minimum inflation. If a local market has inflation it makes it difficult for products to get sold on an international market. 

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Understanding the Internationalization Concept. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Analysis of “Where are you Going where have you Been” by Joyce Carol Oates

"In her short story, Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? Joyce Carol Oates tells a rather disturbing tale of a vain teenaged girl and a mysterious man. This narrative truly showcases Oates's brilliant writing style and the characters in this work are deeply fascinating. All the main characters in this short story represent something more than they appear at surface level and the interpretations of these characters by literary scholars vary greatly. The characters and what they mean are the most important part of this story. Connie and her family are a bit ordinary, but they are easily relatable characters. In contrast, Arnold and Ellie are strange and dangerous depictions of dark forces. From young Connie and the older strangers Arnold and Ellie to Oates's dreamy storytelling there is a lot to discuss.

Oates hooks us into her story by introducing us to Connie, a self-involved fifteen-year-old who is spending her summer chasing boys and listening to music. She seems to have issues with all her family members for one reason or another. Connie and her friend meet some boys at a restaurant when she spots Arnold Friend for the first time in a parking lot. She forgets about both him and his strange car until later. Then, one Sunday afternoon, her family leaves to go to a picnic and Connie stays home to wash her hair and listen to music. While she is listening to the radio Arnold and his friend Ellie Oscar show up at her house. The combination of Arnold's strange appearance, his age, and his creepily-intimate knowledge of Connie and her family frightens our main character. He tries in many different ways to lure her outside until eventually Arnold gains seemingly complete control over the girl, rendering her helpless. The story ends with Connie leaving the protection of her home and going with Arnold- ostensibly against her will. The story when taken at face-value might seem like realistic fiction but with closer inspection the events are probably just a part of Connie's nightmare.

When we are first introduced to Connie, it quickly becomes obvious that she is immature. This character was not written as one who was wise beyond her years, like a lot of stories portray their heroines. Instead, she pretends to be more mature than she really is. The lack of parental interest in Connie's life allows her to roam freely without any real structure which leads to her feeling more independent than she actually is. In the story's setting of mid-century suburbia, we see that the youth is heavily influenced by pop-culture and music, and Connie is no exception. Popular culture plays an important role in shaping Connie's consciousness and in creating her idea of romantic love as idealistically sweet and gentle; this hope is ultimately destroyed by Friend (LitFinder). Connie is obsessed with music, and it saturates everything in the story. Her love for music might even be her undoing, because it seems as though music is the weapon Arnold and Ellie use to control her.

""In 'Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?' a satyr does come into the city, in the form of Arnold Friend"" (Easterly). Joan Easterly believes that the unusual Arnold Friend is actually a satyr in disguise. Oates gives many clues that this could be the case. His unusual appearance might be hiding several bits of demi-god anatomy from a wig covering his horns to his ill-fitting boots that might be secretly housing hooves. Naive Connie might not fully understand the extent of Arnold's deception. She seems to think he is only an older man pretending to be young but if he is actually a mythological creature he is far more dangerous. His complete and unnatural control over Connie is a lot easier to explain if you think he is a supernatural being. However, many people believe that he is just a representation of Charles Schmid, a murderer that somehow lured teenaged girls to their deaths during the same time period as this story. While it is likely that he represents a satyr, without a direct statement from Oates as to who Arnold represents, he is open for interpretation. As Easterly puts it, The interpretations of Arnold Friend are complex and diverse, a tribute to Oates's skill in creating allusive patterns, but the shadow of a satyr, flute in hand, lurks behind them all.

Arnold Friend and Connie are not the only characters in this story that critics have dissected. Arnold's partner-in-crime Ellie Oscar has drawn the attention of many scholars as well. According to Alice Hall Petry, he is a representation of The King. She describes him as ""a character whose appearance, personality, and behavior suggest he is the incarnation of the admitted idol of Friend's prototype: Elvis Presley."" If you picture the character's hair, sideburns, and clothes- chances are you're just picturing Elvis. It also seems impossible for this character to exist without music, as it's always following him and Arnold. His and Arnold's music seem to be the most important part of the spell they have over Connie, and Ellie plays a big part in charming her with it- even turning up the radio in the car while Arnold is attempting to lure Connie outside. As with Elvis, Ellie projects an ambivalent sexual/motivational message which leaves his intended victim- a sexually mature but inexperienced adolescent girl- unsure of whether to perceive him as innocuous or sinister (Petry). There is a more sinister interpretation of Ellie though that is quite popular. He could also be a satyr alongside Arnold. It is strange and threatening that this character is silent except when he offers to help his friend by pulling out Connie's telephone. And as Easterly says, several critics have noted, however, that these two men probably killed the old woman who lived down the road from Connie, and the threats to Connie's family are direct. It seems as though Ellie Oscar might be more dangerous than just a caricature of a dead rock star.

While Connie's family are not quite as interesting as Arnold and Ellie, they are still important to the story. One thing we know for certain about Connie's family is that she isn't really very close with them. As far as we can tell, our young protagonist has the worst relationship with her mother. In fact, other than a rocky marriage that's about all we know about her- that she picks on her daughter and Connie doesn't like her all that much. She seems to be the formally-beautiful archetypal domestic woman from what we gather from the story. Connie's mother often compares her to her older sister June, who is a dowdy girl that works at her sister's school. There is probably a lot of resentment between the two sisters since Connie is prettier, but her sister is portrayed as a dependable professional and is preferred by their mother. Connie's father is not really a participating member of the family, he appears to only read his newspaper and avoid his wife and daughters. His lack of involvement is really the only remarkable thing about his character. We may not see many examples of affection from Connie towards her family, but it is important to note that when her family was threatened Connie sacrificed herself to save them- that's one interpretation at least. It could also be interpreted that she had no control over herself with Arnold. Many scholars think that the story was all Connie's nightmare. In Impure realism: Joyce Carol Oates's Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?' D.F. Hurley claims that Oates's story violates one of the rules' of dream vision or nightmare fiction: she does not complete the pattern by reawakening the dreamer to his/her old reality. The story ends before we find out for sure if Connie was dreaming her encounter with Friend and Oscar. According to Hurley, the struggle between a nightmare and a nightmarish imitation of reality is not just Connie's but the reader's too.

In closing, Oates's allegorical style of writing lends to many different interpretations of the characters in Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? Connie is a stereotypical teenaged girl preoccupied with her appearance, love and music. Arnold is a personified representation of a mythological demigod and his friend Ellie represents either the King of rock and roll or another dark creature like Arnold. No matter how you understand the characters, they really are the heart of this story.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Analysis of "Where Are You Going Where Have You Been" by Joyce Carol Oates. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Self-esteem, Reputation and a General Mindset in “Where are you Going, where have you Been?”

The story that will be evaluated is entitled, ""Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?"" This story is by Joyce Carol Oates, published in 1966. The author is trying to get the audience to grasp concepts such as self-esteem, reputation, and a general mindset of how our decision making process can effect us heavily. Through the main character Connie, we learn about how mind-bottling life can be as she goes about her day-to-day activities. The story, ""Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been,"" is an excellent example of how our reputation precedes us in which, it makes us face the reality of our decisions. Thus, we come to terms with our actions and this puts us in unfavorable situations to make choices we don't necessarily want to make.

Summary

This story is about a fifteen year old girl, Connie. Throughout the story the author submits Connie's feelings and emotions as she goes about her day. Connie's character shows strong opinions towards her family especially her mother. The main character's view is that her mother favors her sister June. Connie's main belief is that her mother is jealous of her attractiveness. Through her actions/attitude Connie is characterized as a free spirit, who uses her appearance as a tool to, ""hang-out,"" with boys. The conflict of the story is when Connie is left home alone when her family leaves to go to a barbecue. She then sits around and listens to the radio until a jalopy pulls up in her drive way. Connie walks to the screen door where she meets Arnold Friend and instantly she is captivated with curiosity. As they start to conversate Connie begins to question Friend asking, ""Who are you,"" and ""why are you here?"" Connie is constantly observing the scene as she notices Friend's buddy Ellie Oscar in the car. Also, she notices Friend's rugged looks and makes the assumption that he is older than 18. As all these thoughts are rushing almost all at once to Connie, she ultimately feels uncomfortable and wants him to leave. Friend insists on taking her for a ride. When she refuses, Friend's attitude leans towards becoming dangerous and aggressive. At this point, their general conversation elevates to a confrontation. Friend obviously has heard about Connie and what she likes to do in her spare time, so he thinks she is an, ""easy score."" Arnold then threatens Connie, telling her that he will potentially hurt her family if she doesn't comply. The main character contemplates calling the police but she fears Friend will hut her before she gets the chance. Friend then tells Connie where her family is and the exact details of what they are doing, without Connie saying anything. As she puts all the possible out comes together, she feels as though going with Friend will protect her family. The author illustrates a scene of hopelessness as Connie gives herself up and hence extinguishing her freedom. The author concludes with a sort of cliff-hanger vibe as Connie leaves with Friend, which puts it all in perspective, that Connie's old lifestyle is gone forever.

Analysis

The duration of the story tip-toes around the concept of Arnold Friend's presence. Connie is enticed by Friend's elastic ability to be smooth one minute then be completely nonchalant the next. But there are some aspects that just don't add up, so you have to ask yourself a few questions. ""How did Friend know where Connie lived? How did he know her name? How did he know exactly where her family was and what they were doing? Why did he act as if he had known Connie beforehand? How did he build the audacity to talk to her the way he did?"" Simply, some would say that he heard about her through the, ""grape-vine."" But there is just some content that is just disturbing.

A theory that can be put into motion is that this whole confrontation is a symbolic representation of Connie's sub consciousness. For example the series of conversation where Friend says,"" I ain't late, am I?"" and ""Toldja I'd be out, didn't I?"" places thoughts into hysteria. Connie wasn't really expecting anybody over, she was just trying to chill and listen to the radio. Friend rolls up like he owns the joint and Connie is instantly amazed with curiosity.

Potentially, as Connie was daydreaming when her family drove away, she drifted into a slumber. The story says that she had closed her eyes in the sun and was just thinking about the characteristics of love. When she awoke she felt as if her setting was different. ""She shook her head as if to stay awake,"" per Oates. Possibly, during this time lapse Connie slipped into her unconsciousness and created this whole scenario about Friend.

Sounding as far fetched as it seems, this perspective can be examined like a nightmare. So at first, she falls asleep and everything is good then she wakes up feeling offset. During her dream she is accompanied by the confusion Friend brings. She feels obligated to talk to him as she is frozen in her current stance. She wants to move but she is not in control because her mind has invaded itself and created an alternate dimension. The main character is forced to live out this fantasy in order to grapple with the actual reality of her choices. In real life she chooses to get to know her male counterparts better in her form of social or sexual experimentation. Connie always has a perception that her looks are what makes her and she can never be defined by anything else. Her turmoil with her family along with her paranoia coats the fact that she negates to look towards where her life is actually heading.

A form of self-sabotage comes into question as well because Connie's destructive nature allows room for someone to take advantage of her. It's not crazy to suspect that her dream was her sub consciousness trying to warn her that the free life she was trying to desperately grasp would only keep to danger. A few things are just to coincidental, such as the convenience that Friend knew where her family was. Along with the timing of the family leaving for the barbecue and Friend just happens to show up. Also the way Oates ends the tale, can only be summarized by the underlying effects of a nightmare. Connie goes through this journey of self discovery to uncover the fear of her decisions as well as, the hopelessness she feels without her family. This all can accumulate to an epiphany suggesting that she should be grateful for what she has and to not try to grow up so fast. Perhaps this dream was a blessing in disguise so she can truly, ""wake up,"" and take responsibility in her young life to prevent a downfall towards an impending road of darkness.

Conclusion

The author captures a unique take on the, ""grip of reality theme,"" to allow young readers to make their own conclusions on what they think happened to Connie. Ultimately we as humans are always caught up with trying to take advantage of life. Often times, the decisions we make when we are younger can backlash on to our entire adult life, which can effect how the world perceives us. Our reputation is a definite essential to us and we always leave some sort of impact on this world with it. So in the end this story, ""Where Are You Going, Where Have You been,"" is an eye opener to all of us because what happened to Connie is a prime example of how our reputation/decisions can be left vulnerable for some else to prey upon. I challenge all who read this story to analyze all the main points, central ideas, and literacy factors to create their own perspective of Connie's fate.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Self-esteem, Reputation and a General Mindset in "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?". (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Becoming an Agent of Change as a Hearing Interpreter

Our intersectionalities, which make up who we identify as, can affect our relationships with the people we surround and interact with. While my goal is to become an interpreter, I must simultaneously continue to self analyze my privileges as well as how my intersectionality can affect the Deaf community. There are many factors that make up my intersectionality; for instance, I am a woman, hearing, straight, no strong religious base, spiritual, person of color in a mixed race relationship, etc. Any one of these factors or one that I have yet to discover can affect my position as an interpreter and the way the Deaf community views me. I will be discussing how it can affect my interpreting assignments, my decisions and the relationships I'll build or individuals I'll come into contact with, within the Deaf community. Being aware of my identity and privileges can further advance my knowledge of others while I build relationships with Deaf individuals in diverse cultures. As an interpreter with various factors within my intersectionality, I must identify when to code switch relating to cultures to appropriately fit the Deaf consumer's needs. Being able to take a step back and self analyze if I'm a good fit for that Deaf consumer (DDBDDHH or POC) is crucial for the equal access of the individual. As I go through my interpreting career, I must become aware of my boundaries, what model type (liberal, helper, advocate, conservative, etc.) I choose, and how I can better give the reins to the DDBDDHH consumer so they can advocate for themselves rather than me taking that place. Overall, how I can support the Deaf community with the knowledge, articles, readings, etc. I've learned throughout the semester.

Being aware of my hearing privilege can either negatively or positively affect my DDBDDHH consumer on assignment. Suggs, talks about disempowerment (situational and economic). In the article, she discusses an experience she had with an interpreter who exercised their hearing privilege in a negative way. Suggs had an unsatisfactory experience dealing with a rude receptionist who later apologized to the interpreter (who covered her mouth while talking). The interpreter took it upon herself to accept the apology and tell the receptionist that is was okay; furthermore, proceeded to lie and hesitate to the Deaf consumer (Suggs) about what happened. This is an example of how not to use my hearing privilege and role as an interpreter to speak on behalf of the DDBDDHH client. If the interpreter took an ethical and effective approach to inform the receptionist that she can directly apologize to the Deaf consumer, then the interpreter could then be an agent of change. By choosing to do so, the interpreter gives power and voice to who it rightfully belongs to in this situation. In an article Coyne wrote, he talks about social justice and how the interpreter shouldn't make decisions for the consumer but rather turn control to the DDBDDHH-POC leaders. Coyne states, Again, most injustices experienced by Deaf people are types that interpreters will never fully get', because as hearing individuals, hearing interpreters may only have secondary experiences to associate with individuals who experience our world differently. This is one way myself, as a future interpreter, can support DDBDDHH growth within their community/culture and diminish situational disempowerment in the interpreting field. Also, it's important for me to understanding DDBDDHH rights and how I may relate to a few factors within their intersectionality, but can never relate to their DDBDDHH identity.

As I mentioned before my intersectionality plays a big role in my future interpreting work and how others connect with me. In 2015 RID memberships were made up of 88% White interpreters and 12% interpreters of color. Being able to relate to a DDBDDHH person of color due to my intersectionality factor of being of color (Hispanic), can further evolve my interpreting work. In Oyedele's article she discusses the lack of diversity within the predominantly White, female field of sign language interpreters.' Oyedele is a Black interpreter and conducted a Black Deaf focus group to discover the struggles that Deaf people of color go through while having an interpreter who doesn't understand their ethnic culture. My intersectionality can provide linguistic and cultural understanding and perspective to further connect with the DDBDDHH consumer of color and provide a better interpretation for them. Oyedele states, Let's consider what that means for consumers of color. It means they are working overtime to assimilate to the needs of interpreters, instead of interpreters working to accommodate their needs. With my collective identity and upbringing, I can ensure that when I accept assignments, that I am the right fit for the DDBDDHH consumer's ultimate goal. This can teach me that if I feel comfortable and confident to accept an assignment, I must be able to fully incorporate the DDBDDHH person of color's culture; moreover, be able to interpret multicultural discussions. The competency of an interpreter in a culturally, linguistically, and diverse environment can either hinder or diminish the DDBDDHH communities intersectionalities of who they are. If I as an interpreter don't fully comprehend or agree with an identity, then I will not produce adequate work.

Lastly, in Leeson's presentation at Gallaudet, she talks about how the interpreter should think to oneself, what is my role? what is my identity? because identities are dynamic and fluid in an ever evolving society. She speaks on structural, political, and representational intersectionality and how all three can deter from the DDBDDHH consumer's individuality, community and culture. As I set my future goals, actions, and plans as an interpreter, I must take into account that I should not be the ambassador of the DDBDDHH community or culture but rather a supporter during all assignments. Leeson states, Interpreters must be reflective and think about how to better harmonize with the Deaf consumer. The fact that each deaf, deaf blind, deaf disabled, hard of hearing person has different upbringings and intersectionalities, my goal as an interpreter should represent the DDBDDHH consumer, as well as, utilize all my knowledge/experience that I've accumulated throughout my academic journey about the Deaf culture.

Overall, I have learned to accept and analyze my privileges and identities and how it can affect my work and the DDBDDHH community. Especially in reading My Deaf is not your Deaf, the authors really show a new perspective of different DDBDDHH identities growing at different speeds and how the individuals discovered their DDBDDHH pride in various ways. One author, Noppawan, states I felt that I needed to gain more knowledge and understanding about Deaf culture, identity, community, education, language and all the meaning of being Deaf. As a future interpreter, when I read this I understand that some DDBDDHH consumers may still be searching for who they are, maybe not only within the Deaf community but also in other aspects to their intersectionality. As an interpreter, I must be flexible and supportive to the Deaf community and ready to learn and adapt to new factors that involve the Deaf consumer. As long as I stay fluid in my work and stay versatile then I can better support the Deaf consumer with equal access rights and integrity.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Becoming an Agent of Change as a Hearing Interpreter. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Public Speaking and Fear

Public speaking is the act of delivering a structured talk to a live audience with the aim of informing, persuasion or entertainment. This is tough and many people often freeze on stage or refuse to get on stage altogether. Overcoming this fear and mastering the skills of public speaking can however elevate a person to high heights. Throughout history, good orators have always been a source of inspiration and have always been held in high esteem. One of the most respected public speakers of all time was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr (MLK), an unrelenting force behind the struggle for civil rights for African Americans. By being one of history’s best orators he had a national holiday named after his momentous efforts. His most famous speech ‘I Have Dream’ still carries on his legacy 50 years on. In this speech, MLK embodies all the characteristics of a good public speaker. The determining traits of a good public speaker are evident in MLK’s speeches.

Confidence

Confidence is the most important trait for a good public speaker because it makes one sound more intelligent and seem more credible (Khoury, 2018). This sense of credibility will ensure that people can believe you and follow you. Talking to a large group of people is not easy and nervousness is natural. Mark Twain said “There are only two types of speakers in the world, the nervous and the liars.”, but great orators have mastered the art of hiding this fact. The audience should never see the speaker sweat because confidence translates from the speaker to the audience. When MLK spoke to the 250,000 people at the Lincoln Memorial he must have been nervous, but looking at him you couldn’t tell. He didn’t shift about, stammer or lick his lips in nervousness, he exuded absolute confidence and it translated to his audience who believed in the cause. No one would have wanted to be led by someone who sounded unconfident.

Passion

To be able to move a crowd to your viewpoint, the particular subject you’re discussing should exhilarate you enough to create sincere emotion. This emotion captures the audience and help drives home the message. Passionate speakers are able to harness their passion and share their enthusiasm with their audience. These speakers are charismatic and dynamic, changing their speech delivery in reaction to the audience. MLK was passionate about the rights of equality regardless of people’s skin color and this burning passion is what drove him. This passion meant he delivered powerful speeches that his audiences could relate to. MLK was so passionate about his cause that he didn’t care about all the turmoil and whether he made it to the ‘Promised Land’ so long as his people did. Even imprisonment did not change his drive.

Authenticity

An audience is always on the lookout for credibility and sincerity of a speaker, therefore being yourself on stage is imperative. Learning about how other speakers present themselves is important but one should always stay true to themselves, acknowledged their strengths and work on their weaknesses. Trying to sound like other speakers will discourage audiences from believing you. Speaking in a natural voice is important to show authenticity (Khoury, 2018). In all of MLK's speeches, he talked in his conversational voice and even though there were modulations where he increased his speed or volume in reaction to the crowd he maintained his natural voice. The changes were mainly in the speeches climax to leave a lasting impression on his audience.

Practice

Mastering any craft requires practice. In order to educate others one must know their content well enough and this can only be achieved through practice. Practicing the speeches and refining the content will also help boost confidence of a speaker. Practice does not mean memorizing speeches, it is about being comfortable with the content enough to be able to improvise or manipulate it for different audiences (Khoury, 2018). ‘I Have a Dream’ may be MLK’s most famous speech but some of the content he talked about can be found in his earlier speeches. He made around 300 speeches in a year and this shows that he had practiced his art.

Some speakers are afraid of repeating their content in fear of sounding boring but this is a very effective way of ensuring that an audience grasps the main idea behind a speech. Repeating the important message that resonate with the audience drives the point home (Khoury, 2018). MLK repeated the phrase ‘I Have a Dream’ multiple times to capture his audience and relay his message. He also repeated the fact that they would not be satisfied until justice was served.

The aim of public speaking is connecting with the audience to achieve a certain goal. Therefore if a speaker fails to achieve a connection they have failed. People have a short concentration span and therefore speeches should be short and to the point to avoid boredom (Khoury, 2018). A personal touch and humor is a good way to engage with the audience. MLK used some subtle humor such as his quip about ‘Insufficient justice funds cheque’ that resonated well with the crowd. He also used a personal touch when he talked about his four children being judged by their character and not their skin color. Pauses in the right places for dramatic purposes allows the audience to react and the message to sink in is another important trait of a good speaker. MLK had mastered this art that made him in tune with the crowd and it moved them to act.

Not all people can speak as well as MLK but anyone can cultivate the above skills to become accomplished orators in their own respect. Learning from the best is encouraged to improve but one should not copy or imitate them. They should take these good qualities and use them to harness their own strengths and create their own signature using messages they believe in.

Reference

Khoury, P. (2018). The Top 9 Characteristics of Effective Public Speakers - Magnetic Speaking. Retrieved from https://magneticspeaking.com/the-top-9-characteristics-of-effective- public-speakers/

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Public Speaking and Fear. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Coming to an Awareness of Language and its Importance to Society

Justice Smith In the article of coming to an awareness of language; Malcolm X discusses a time in his life where he considered himself an unfunctional adult because of his lack of being able to read words and to understand what an article, book, or newspaper was explaining. When Malcom X lacked in reading skills, his irritation grew even more by not being able to express his thoughts because he was also unfunctional in writing in a straight line. He harshly criticized himself for not having the ability to read and write efficiently. While Malcolm X was in prison, he motivated himself to pick up a dictionary and to learn words, and memorize what each word meant. Eventually Malcolm X would begin to form sentences with words he learned from the dictionary while also improving his writing skills, and to write in a straight line.

Malcolm gained knowledge of places, people, and events from history which helped him expand his critical thinking skills and gain a better perspective of the society and world he lived in. Being able to read and write would also enhance Malcolm X's perspective on topics he deemed worthy of discussion. When Malcolm X was able to pick up a book, he was finally able to understand what the book was explaining word for word. When Malcolm X read more books in prison, he expressed the feeling of being free, ignoring all the time that had passed while remaining in prison due to burying himself in books; with time passing by, it's as if time didn't exist whenever he read a book. Language is a powerful form of communication. Language is where one expresses thoughts, ideas, and feelings to get a person's point across a discussion or argument. The more a person learns more words, the more a person produces more thoughts. Every time a person learns something new, it changes the brain structure. Every time a person picks up a book or some other reading material; they are at first unaware that just by learning something, can soon lead to learning more things which can change a person's situation, life or outlook for better or worse.

Whatever a person learns; it can mold a person's outlook, personality, thought process, and how to perceive society, which can also shape a person's future for better or worse. Learning a language and how to read can open up new doors of opportunity for many across the world; and Malcolm X took the self interest and opportunity to teach himself to read and write. Many take the opportunity to learn as much as they can, while some don't bother taking the opportunity at all. My experience of learning a language and communicating with people I have never met, have helped open my eyes on learning about where people come from, what shaped their personality and outlook that helped become who they are. When people learn a language, it helps to communicate with other people that share similar experiences and experience new ones. Everyone on this planet has learned a language from their family to friends in order to learn, speak and communicate with one another. Learning a language is an important ability to have and it can also keep certain practices of cultures alive and refrain from being extinct. Learning a language also teaches people to learn about their family history and how we a people came to be. Language also brings more discovery to new things that have been uncovered and examined to understand how it got there and figuring out it's origins. That is the power of language and it offers much more than we people realize.

Works cited:

Buscemi, Santi V., and Charlotte Smith. 75 Readings Plus. 10th edition ed., McGraw-Hill, 1994.

Buscemi, Santi V., and Charlotte Smith. Malcolm X: Coming to an Awareness of Language.

Buscemi, Santi V. Selections from: A Reader for College Writers & 75 Readings Plus. 10th edition ed., McGraw-Hill Education Create, 2015.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Coming to an Awareness of Language and its Importance to Society. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Coming of Age Cancer Therapies

Introduction

In one way or another, cancer has in some way affected our lives. Cancer is a scary word. It makes hearts stop, and emotions run free when you or a loved is told they have cancer. In 2013, a 29 year old and a 59 year old were both cancer patients; one patient was successful through her immunotherapy, and the other was not fully cured, but on the right path. Immunotherapy is not radiation or chemotherapy, but it is when your own cells are altered and used to help fight against the cancer. People who choose to use immunotherapy as their main therapy to battle cancer choose it because it is made for them and personalizes their way of battling cancer. It also is good for patients who previously had bad side effects from chemo or radiation therapy. In this article, they discuss solid tumors, and in 2011, a new drug called Ipilimumab was used to treat advanced cases of Melanoma (Weintraub, 2016). Chemotherapy is liquid which can treat cancer. It is made up of chemicals that are put into the body to stop the cancer from spreading or to shrink the tumor. Another liquid they talk about in the article is hormone and antibody treatments, which are more consistent for patients. These two therapies replaced William Coley's approach from 125 years ago which was like immunotherapy, but without all the advances we have now (Weintraub, 2016).

2 Viewpoints of Therapy

Immunotherapy is the newest way of fighting cancer. With it being the newest way to treat people, it comes with its ups and downs. One of the advantages of this new treatment is that it is good for patients who did not have good experiences with chemotherapy or radiation. Some patients, like the ones we read about in the article, were not getting the results they needed, or it was making them too sick. This new treatment was the answer they were looking for to help fight their cancer more effectively. Although it did not fully cure the one woman, it did help shrink her tumor.

This treatment is still very new, meaning it has some disadvantages. One of these disadvantages is that we do not know all the side effects of the treatment. Each person responds differently to treatments. This treatment could be extremely effective for some people, but maybe not make as much of a difference for someone else. With the treatment being new, we cannot know what the outcomes will be down the road; we don't know if the persons' cancer will come back quicker or more aggressive the next time because of this treatment.

My Opinion

Chemotherapy and radiation are the two therapies that come to my mind when someone says cancer therapy. Reading this article about the two people who chose to do immunotherapy over chemo or radiation because they were not getting the results they were expecting showed me how much it could really help them. The one patient was cancer free after her sessions. The other patient was not as successful, but her cancer is not as strong as it was. It was also used with other therapies to shrink the tumors, so there are other factors that go into its effectiveness. This article makes immunotherapy sound like the best way to fight cancer. I believe that immunotherapy is the beginning for finding a cure for cancer. It is a lot different from chemo and radiation since it uses your own cells to fight it, which makes me assume that the body would respond to it better. To me, this advance is a great start for a cure.

Conclusion

There is still no cure for cancer. There are treatments to stop it, but there is no way to be sure that will not come back. Using new advances in medicine is a start to help improve people's lives who are struggling everyday to fight it. Maybe one day there will be a vaccine to prevent certain types of cancers, but research is far from that happening. Hopefully immunotherapy is the beginning to finding a cure where we can just prevent the disease.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Coming of Age Cancer Therapies. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Advantages and Disadvantages of Becoming a Psychologist

I am interested in becoming a psychologist because it is a dream career of mine since my high school days. I developed an interest in psychology because of the area it covers when it comes to human treatment and the miraculous way of how the brain works. Psychologist deals with treating and diagnosing the human mind and treating diseases associated with the brain, emotions and behavior problems. I am fascinated by the human mind and how this affects our feelings and behaviors, and this motivated me making me want to become a psychologist. Psychologists are essential in the medical field because they help treat mental illnesses. This made me more curious in becoming a psychologist because of my interest on how the brain affects everyone differently when it comes to the different emotions and reactions humans have. This can lead to different behavior patterns people have/can get. In the following paper, I will analyze the advantages and disadvantages that come with being a psychologist.

Advantages of Becoming a Psychologist

One advantage of becoming a psychologist that I have noticed is the reward it offers for helping other people. By assisting people to sort their mental issues, I as a psychologist will gain fulfillment and gratification for having helped them sort out their problems. I also enjoy interacting and working with other people, and this makes becoming a psychologist advantageous for me since I will interact with different patients throughout my career (Wahass, 2013).

The second advantage that supports my choice of becoming a psychologist is decent pay. I choose this career path because it will offer me financial security and enable me to help my lifestyle. Psychologists earn good salaries annually, and this is crucial in my choice of becoming a psychologist. Decent pay and benefits are some of the advantages that motivated me to continue studying Psychology as my major. It encouraged me to become a psychologist since I know I will be paid well for the services that I will provide to people.

Disadvantages of Becoming a Psychologist

From my observation I noticed one significant disadvantage of becoming a psychologist is getting a job is quite a challenge. When starting as a psychologist, I noticed that the competition is stiff and making a name for me in this career will take time and effort. For example, to be successful in this field, I will have to dedicate time and resources into my work to become recognize and get a job. From this, competition and the many hours involved will make my quest to become a psychologist harder (Wahass, 2013).

Another disadvantage of becoming a psychologist is the stress that comes with the job. By becoming a psychologist, I will continuously deal with clients and help them solve their mental issues on a daily basis. Deal with other people problems can be very stressful on me as a psychologist and this has the effect of raising my stress level. From this, it is crucial for psychologists to learn how to separate work from their personal life. The stress involved with handling people's problems will make it hard for me to carry out my duties as a psychologist (Wahass, 2013).

Conclusion

Psychologists are essential in the treatment of mental illnesses. My choice to become one is based on the fact that a career in psychology is lucrative and rewarding. I love helping people solve their emotional and mental problems, and this motivates my decision of becoming a psychologist. The career has advantages and disadvantages like any other career. The benefits motivate me and drive me to become a psychologist. The obstacles despite them being crucial do not deter me from becoming a psychologist because I love helping people cope with their mental problems and this is a driving force my choice of becoming a psychologist.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Advantages and Disadvantages of Becoming a Psychologist. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Devil and Tom Walker and Young Goodman Brown

The stories, The Devil and Tom Walker and Young Goodman Brown, maintain numerous differences. Even though both stories were written by the same author, Nathaniel Hawthorne, both stories present different themes, plots, and characters. Throughout both stories, the characters encounter obstacles, but the decisions they make going to present the differences in their character. During the two stories, different personality traits of the main characters, Tom Walker and Goodman Brown, are shown. Throughout The Devil and Tom Walker, Nathaniel Hawthorne tells us Tom Walker is a greedy and selfish man. At the beginning of the story, Tom Walker visits the devil and desires money for himself. Tom makes a deal with the devil: he will become a usurer, and the devil issues him what he wants. After Tom informs his wife about the deal, she also wants to participate and goes to the devil herself. She brings him a household item in hopes of making a deal. The wife goes missing for days. Tom goes out searching for his lost wife and the property she took with her. He finds nothing but her apron with her heart and liver tied up in it. Instead of displaying sympathy for his late wife, Tom feels liberated and concerned for his lost property. On the other hand, Goodman Brown was a considerate and compassionate man. When Brown meets the traveler he is sure not to touch the staff or do anything Brown's family, whom he thought was very religious. Before Brown leaves to go to the meeting he is with his wife, unlike Tom Walker Brown cares for his wife and wants her to be safe, and tells her to pray so she will be unharmed. Not only are the characters' personalities different but also the characters' lifestyle. In both stories, the lifestyles of Tom Walker and Goodman are shown. Throughout The Devil and Tom Walker, Tom is shown not religiously. However, in Young Goodman Brown, Goodman Brown is very religious. Throughout The Devil and Tom Walker, Tom is not an avid churchgoer, but towards the end starts showing he is religious by going to church and constantly carrying a bible around, even though his heart does not change. During Young Goodman Brown, Goodman shows that he is very religious. For example, he told his wife to pray, and he prayed. In addition, he talks about his Christianity and how the church members do not abide by such wickedness. By the end of both stories, the themes are clear, which is also another difference between the two stories. In The Devil and Tom Walker, the themes are temptation and greed. Throughout the story, Tom will do anything and everything to collect the money from the devil; such as making a deal with the devil. Also, the devil in the story tries to get on Tom's good side so Tom will take the deal. For example, the devil first offered Tom the job of a slave trader, Tom refused. Then the devil offered a usurer, Tom accepted. However, in Young Goodman Brown,' the themes were a loss of innocence and humanity's weak nature. During the story, Goodman has a set belief on everyone he knows, including his wife, but after the meeting the traveler he realizes most people in the church, his family and wife all had evil in them. All the people Goodman thought were good had a mask and only showed the parts of their life they wanted to. After Goodman found out about everyone he began to feel scared and changed the way acted and thought about those people. While the stories were not opposite, they still were very distinctive. In conclusion, the characters in both stories had their own lifestyle and personality that were predisposed to their story. Also, the themes of both stories were driven by the characters which made them different. Both stories presented many struggles, but were very distinct
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Devil and Tom Walker and Young Goodman Brown. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Phenomenon of Nacirema

It is a bit difficult to write about Horace Miner's The Body Ritual among the Nacirema, without detailing what occurs in the text. Normally, in an anthropology text, this should not be the problem, but in fact it is, and just reading the text you can understand.The text addresses how we relate to cultures that are different from ours and how our gaze is directed towards aspects that seemingly can be judged as magical, irrational and even grotesque.

They are a North American group living in the territory between the Canadian Cree, the Yaqui and Tarahumare of Mexico, and the Carib and Arawak of the Antilles. Little is known of their origin, although tradition states that they came from the east....According to Horace Minner "Ritual Body among the Nacirema" philosophically addresses the lifestyle of this North American group obsessed with magic and with unusual beliefs. According to him, care for health and appearance is a hallmark of the culture of this people, to care for their bodies Nacirema perform rituals and ceremonies with masochistic tendencies.

Horace describes the ceremonial aspects of this tribe, according to him much of the day of these people is occupied by magical rituals. In all the houses there is a sanctuary, in it there are a great number of magical potions and spells, that are obtained by professionals of the area. In this space secret and private rituals are practiced. Daily family members perform a brief rite of ablution in the sacred waters found in such space. In the daily ritual of the body, men scratch and lacerate their own faces. Women bake their heads in ovens for an average of thirty minutes.

The anthropologist also describes the care with the mouth, which is a constant concern for this society. To prevent rotting teeth and attract friends, members are subjected to torture rituals annually. The "sacred-mouthmen" - experts in the field - use tools such as drills, probes, and needles. With them they widen any holes in your teeth and deposit magical materials in the.

It is also important to note that the author cites the latipsoh. When they get sick, the natives look for this place where extremely violent ceremonies are held in exchange for rich gifts to the janitor. But strange as it may seem, adults wait anxiously for such ritual purification; which leaves even more visible to the masochistic tendency of the group.

Horace Minner (1912 - 1993) was a respected American anthropologist with a PhD from the University of Chicago. Author of books such as "Culture and Agriculture", "City in Modern Africa", among others.When reading the text, a modern man may find the culture of the Nacirema disgusting or crazy. But I do not agree with the position of the actor, which he is describing are American customs, in other words. The sanctuaries are the restrooms, the "sacred-mouthmen" are dentists and the latipsoh the hospital. The Nacirema are, in fact, the Americans. And if all the practices of bodily rites - so weird - are our own practices

The key to understanding the text is to invert the words. Just as American is the opposite, we have Notgnihsaw - Washington; latipsoh is hospital. The rites described and the magical substances are the ones we use in the bathroom and in the hospitals. The rites of daily care of the body, the way people have relationships or how women stop are our ways ...

One of the aspects explored is the idea that in some cultures there are actions and procedures that can be recognized as the fruit of science and technical development, whereas in other communities decisions about how to deal with the body are completely devoid of common sense and purpose. However, much of what is present in the text is the question of the other's gaze and how we do not know how to relate to the differences and peculiarities of each society - including our own.

The belief that things are as they are and that we simply must accept the inevitability of our beliefs is in some ways contrary to the reasonableness with which we believe to treat our own existence and our decisions about how we relate to our bodies. However, the irony of the text is precisely to show how we are more contradictory, incoherent and naive than we imagine.

 Observing a society as if we were not part of it can make it full of "rituals" related to the human body. They are practices that present a very usual aspect to those who coadulate it in a routine. Which, however, for outsiders looking at from the top seem extreme attitudes, one has wondered how far human behavior can go.

The way the author makes it very clear that most of these everyday rituals of a people show us an air of extremism and at the same time an approximation and similarity in such practices that makes us reflect on our whole behavioral routine.

The author makes it very clear that most of these rituals are sustained and based on the search for a healthier and more beautiful body. And to achieve such a goal population shows masochistic tendency as the example described by the author of the act of sebarbear in the case of men. And as good examples of this well-defined masochistic tendency are people who spend hours and hours in a bodybuilding academy and others who undergo plastic surgeries.

We conclude that our daily bodily attitudes leave us so obsessed that we do not perceive the rudeness and irrelevance of the relentless search for a beautiful and healthy body.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A Phenomenon Of Nacirema. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Young Goodman Brown and the Characters

In the beginning of the story we are introduced to Young Goodman Brown as he says goodbye to his wife of three months, Faith. He tells her that he must go on this journey, and that he will be back by the morning. He never clearly states where he is going. After Goodman Brown finally parts with Faith, he sets out into the forest where he meets a man. Although he was expecting to find this man, he is frightened when he sees his figure in the dark forest ahead of him. As they walk through the forest they talk about Goodman's family. Goodman finds it hard to believe this man knew his father or grandfather because as the story goes on we see that he is clearly not a good character. The strange man talks on about how is close to Christians and all good people, even though by the tone of the story you get the feeling the man is evil. As the journey continues, they come across an old woman named Goody Cloyse. Goody Cloyse is Goodman Brown's catechism teacher who appears briefly in the woods. Goodman thinks that she is a spiritual guide but soon realizes she is part of the evil that surrounds him. The same is true with Deacon Gookin and the Minister who come riding along and Goodman realizes that these men are both apart of the evil. As the story goes on Goodman walks into in a clearing, there is a large fire and what appears to be a demonic ritual taking place and Goodman Brown thinks he sees his dead father. The leader of the evil discusses how everyone is evil and, he sees that the woman on the altar next to his deceased father is actually his wife Faith. He yells at he to resist the evil, but as he does so the entire scene disappears, and he is left alone, wondering what happened. When this happens its leads to wonder if it really happened or if it was simply a dream. The day after this event, Goodman Brown walks back to Salem and runs across many of the people he met during his dream. He is disturbed and ignores all of them, including his wife, whom he once treasured. The rest of his life is spent in misery as he thinks everyone is part of a secret evil demonic group. In many ways, this story is very symbolical. It can be summarized by stating that this is one man's realization that he is surrounded by opposing forces without ever knowing which of them are good or which are evil. Faith is the light in the story. The dark forest which is a symbol for things that are dark and mysterious, the mysterious man is a symbol for an evil person or maybe the devil himself. Goodman is leaving behind his Faith and asking for the truth about who is good or evil.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Young Goodman Brown and the Characters. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Crime – Terribly Revealing

Crime is terribly revealing. actions. Agatha Christie, And Then There Were None. What makes a hate crime so is that the perpetrator is stimulated to harm a positive character (or people) primarily based on their race, faith, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or gender. If a person beats and robs the following character they see, that is assault and theft. If a person comes to a decision they need to beat and rob the subsequent person they see with a turban on, that's an attack, theft, and also a hate crime. Crimes are on occasion pre-pondered and target anybody (or a person the perpetrator perceives to be much less likely to resist). The difference is that within the second situation, the robber is choosing a person to assault based totally on their race, religion, and/or ethnicity.

Black people still are victims of hate crime more than any other group. These hate crimes are often driven by an immature itch for exhilaration and drama. Think bored and under the influence of alcohol younger guys marauding thru neighborhoods, mayhem on their minds. Often there's no actual purpose for these crimes, experts say. They're dedicated for the thrill of it, and the victims are prone virtually due to the fact their sexual, racial, ethnic, gender or religious history differs from that of their attackers. Often the attackers suppose society does not care approximately the sufferers - or worse, will applaud their attack. In these hate crimes, the attackers sees themselves as ""defending"" their turf: their neighborhood, their place of business, their religion or their U.SA.

Unlike thrill-seekers, who invade other neighborhoods and attack with out warning, ""defenders"" target particular sufferers and justify their crimes as necessary to keep threats at bay. Many times, they may be brought about by way of a selected event, consisting of a Muslim or black own family stepping into a new community. Hate tears society alongside racial, ethnic, gender, and religious traces. The U.S. Department of Justice warns that detest crimes, greater than every other crime, can trigger community battle, civil disturbances, and even riots. For all their patriotic rhetoric, hate groups and their imitators are genuinely looking to divide us; their perspectives are essentially anti-democratic. True patriots fight hate. Take critically the smallest hint of hate even what seems to be easy name-calling. The Department of Justice once more has a caution: Slurs regularly escalate to harassment, harassment to threats, and threats to bodily violence. Don't wait to fight hate.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Crime - Terribly Revealing. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Hate Crimes Theories in the Gwen Araujo Case

Gwen Araujo was born February 24, 1985 under the name Eddie Araujo. However, this was not who Gwen was. She was a trans woman. Moreover, Gwen was victim of a heinous hate crime and was murdered on October 3, 2002 for simply being who she was. Gwen was seventeen years old when she murdered by four men in Newark, California (Rook, 2016). But let's review what led to the night of Gwen's murder. Gwen met her assailants, Michael Magidson, Jose Mer©l, Jaron Nabors, and Jason Cazares, during the summer of 2002. During this time she was also undergoing hormone replacement therapy (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 5, Class 7 Slurs, 2018). However, it is reported that she had oral sex with Magidson and anal sex with Mer©l, but was able to keep the secret of her male sex organs by claiming to be menstruating and keeping the men's hands away from her private areas (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 5, Class 7 Slurs, 2018). Later on the night Gwen would die, she attended a party at a house rented by Mer©l. It was on this night at the party that the men would discover Gwen's secret via forced inspection and this angered the men to the point of violence (Rook, 2016). The autopsy showed Gwen died of strangulation and blunt force trauma to the head.

The men disposed of Gwen's body four hours away and buried her near the Sierra Nevada Mountains (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 5, Class 7 Slurs, 2018). Gwen's disappearance and murder went unreported for days by both the men and other partygoers until Nabors became distraught and led authorities to the grave site in exchange for his guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter and a promise to testify at the trial (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 5, Class 7 Slurs, 2018, slide 17). Nabors was sentenced to eleven years in prison. Magidson and Mer©l were both convicted of second-degree murder, but not convicted of the hate crime enhancement allegations, they were both sentenced for fifteen years (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 5, Class 7 Slurs, 2018, slide 17). Cazares was sentenced to six years in prison and pleaded no contest to manslaughter (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 5, Class 7 Slurs, 2018, slide 17). The psychological theory is a micro level theory and it is what most people think of when they think of hate crimes (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018). Most theoretical accounts of hate crime assume a necessary psychological cause because leading definitions of hate crime presuppose individual hostility toward the victim's social group (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018, slide 10).

The functional approach serves some kind of need and thus acts as sort of a coping mechanism and is mentally beneficial to the person (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018). Looking at Gwen's case through this lens it is possible that once the men found out Gwen was trans, they thought violence was the only way to cope with the fact that they had sexual interactions with a trans person, or in their eyes, a biological man. In addition to this, it is also possible that the four men involved in Gwen's murder had different motivations for committing the crime, but yet, they still committed the same crime, which can be understood via the functional approach. For this case one of the probable benefits is the expressive function of the psychological theory. To be more specific, the defensive part of the expressive function is defined as lowering a person's anxiety resulting from her or his unconscious psychological conflicts, such as those connected to sexuality and gender (Ghazi-Tehran, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018, slide 14). In relation to this case the fact that they had sexual interactions with a trans women could symbolize unacceptable part of the self (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018, slide 15).

I believe the men felt confused and betrayed by the fact that they had sexual interaction with a trans woman and because of their confusion, acted in anger. Along those lines that they had to show the other guys in the group they were not gay, even though they had sex with Gwen. In addition, it is possible that the value expressive, which is also an expressive function of the psychological theory, played a role. The value expressive enables people to affirm their belief in and adherence to important values that are closely related to their self-concepts (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018, slide 14). So it could be that one of the four men just felt very negatively towards the trans and the LGBTQ+ community and took this negative emotion out on Gwen. Finally, there is also the likelihood that because this crime involved a group of guys that it could actually be a case of social expressive, which is another expressive function. Social expressive strengthens one's sense of belonging to a groups and helps an individual gain acceptance, approval, or love from other people whom he or she considers important (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 6, Class 8 Individual Theory, 2018, slide 14).

So it could be that one or more of the men continued this act because he felt that he had to do it to gain or remain accepted by the other men. Interactional theories of hate crime as the name suggests focuses on all the different types of human interaction, in addition to its structure, content, and the process of it (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 7, Class 10 Social Psychological Theory, 2018). The interactional theory is basically described as being an intense form of doing difference (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 7, Class 10 Social Psychological Theory, 2018). Within the interactional theory, doing difference or, in this case, doing gender is the most represented in this case. Doing gender was the early basis of West and Zimmerman's idea of doing difference. The definition of doing gender is the idea that in Western culture, gender, rather than being an innate quality of individuals, is a psychologically ingrained social construct that actively surfaces in everyday human interaction (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 7, Class 10 Social Psychological Theory, 2018, slide 25). However, the reason this case happened was because the perpetrators viewed Gwen as doing gender wrong. Because in their eyes she was a he, but he was living as a woman, which in their minds was wrong.

In the article A General Theories of Hate Crime? Strain, Doing Difference and Self Control (2011) the author explains doing difference as the following example: For instance, if gay people make public their sexual orientation through visible displays of affection or by opening establishments patronised predominantly by gay people, they threaten the heteronormativity of civilised society. In response to this blatant deviation from society's sexual norm, many people will wish to suppress gay people for fear that they will increasingly encroach upon society's sexual identity (p. 318). Similarly, people feel the need to suppress trans people, like Gwen, out of fear. The article continues to discuss how then hate crimes and other acts of violence are used to attempt to punish members of the LGBTQ+ community and others for trying to live differently than the social and cultural norms and boundaries (Walters, 2011). In the case of Gwen, it is completely possible the four men were using violence to punish Gwen for being trans and living a life not socially accepted by their idea of society's norms. Thus, the idea of doing difference is really just an overarching fear of people being different that the mass majority. One of the theories in which this case is not is an economic theory. The economic theory traces violence to economic conditions and adverse economic conditions to a source of social strain (Ghazi-Tehrani, Week 8, Class 11 Sociological and Economic Theories, 2018, slide 25).

This crime, however, was not economically motivated because there was no threat to the men's ability to attain wealth or a job, nor was the crime impacted by other economic conditions, such as an economic downturn. Magidson and Mer©l claimed trans panic defense and thus avoided the hate crime enhancement. The trans panic defense is a variation of the gay panic defense, which, refers to a situation in which a heterosexual individual loses control and commits a violent crime against a gay individual when faced with unwanted sexual advances. (Tomei & Cramer, 2016, p. 217). The Gwen Araujo Justice for Victims Act was enacted in 2006 and now exists to hopefully limit further gay/trans panic claims. Moreover, it was strengthened in 2014 when a law further prevented the use of this defense. Dylan Vade is cited to have stated, Transgender people do not deceive. We are who we are (Wodda & Panfil, 2015, p. 927). The theories that relate to this case are psychological and interactional, and there are possibly even more. But all the theories and logic do not negate the fact that a beautiful woman died for being who she was. Regardless of what the court said, this case should be viewed for what it is: a heinous hate crime. But after such horrendous crimes like the cases of Matthew Shepard, James Byrd Jr., and Gwen Araujo we have luckily seen legal reform in acts such as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act and the Gwen Araujo Justice for Victims Act.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Hate Crimes Theories in the Gwen Araujo Case. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Detest Bad Behavior

A detest bad behavior is a furious exhibition against people, property, or relationship because of the social occasion to which they have a place or identify with. Scorn bad behaviors are submitted against an extensive variety of social events of people. Differing sorts of people furthermore execute these infringement. Some detest bad behaviors are infringement against property, for instance, vandalisms and pulverization of stores, structures, and places of adoration. Scorn infringement against another person can be as unimportant as fundamental strike without a weapon, yet can similarly be serious as because of ambush or murder.

Many abhor bad behaviors rely upon racial or religious tendency. Racial tendency is the most compelling motivation for scorn bad behaviors. African-Americans are the greatest assembling in threat. Racial based abhor infringement have been an issue since the sixty's in the midst of the social freedoms improvement. Religious inclination is furthermore an essential reason behind hate infringement. Jewish people and Catholics make up most of the losses of religious based bad behaviors. In the midst of World War 2, religious based loathe infringement were the most exceedingly frightful. Nazi Germany attempted to thoroughly wipe out the Jewish people. African-Americans, Jews, and Catholics are still somewhat separated from whatever is left of the country.

On June 7, 1998, James Byrd Jr. was executed in the most well-known and horrid, stomach turning, and loathes bad behaviors in recorded history. Late one summer night, as he was walking home from a friend's home after a social occasion, John William King, close by Lawrence Russell Brewer and Shawn Allen Berry pulled up in a pickup truck offered Mr. Byrd a ride home. He ricocheted into the bed of their truck and was made a beeline for a limited rich zone, genuinely beaten, urinated on, and bidden to the back of a truck by his lower legs and pulled for in excess of three miles on an unpleasant road before the men, later recognized as racial oppressors, hurled what was left of his body-a crushed center into a cemetery. Byrd's disconnected head; neck and right arm were found just about a mile a long way from the graveyard. Police reports exhibit that that there was a trail of blood, body parts and effects that reached out for more than two miles and that Brewer shower painted Mr. Byrd's face with dim paint before he was executed.

The Rainbow Lounge strike occurred in the early morning hours of June 28, 2009, at the Rainbow Lounge, a newly opened gay bar in Fort Worth, Texas. The assault was by people from the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) and the Fort Worth Police Department. A few customers were caught for intoxication and one customer, Chad Gibson, got an outrageous head and cerebrum harm while being contained by the officers. The police moreover declared the gay man contacted them with sexual behavior. Diverse customers were limited and later released without being detained. The attacked at the Rainbow Lounge lead up to several individual being fired after the Use of Force investigation determined that the Rainbow Lounge was targeted for being a gay car and that the TABC officer used that was unnecessary and reasonable.

On October 28, 2009 President Obama signed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crime Prevention Act 18 U.S.C. ?§ 249, which expanded existing United States federal hate crime law to apply to crimes motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability, and dropped the prerequisite that the victim be engaging in a federally protected activity. Since President Obama has signed the hate crime prevention I do not feel that the Hate Crimes have been adequately addressed. In Texas we see still so much despise hate crimes in our state, we have ""black lives matters"" groups challenging for the individuals who have carried out violations and a white officer has done their business to secure themselves as well as other people. I believe that The Texas Law creators still need to roll out a great deal of improvements to the Hate Crimes counteractive action. The Texas Law creators need to ensure that regardless, the shading, sex or sexual personality of a person that they don't need to fear from others and feel safe when they are out in the community.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A Detest Bad Behavior. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

What is the Meaning of Hate Crimes?

What causes the increase in hate crimes? Hate crimes are one that targets an individual, group, organization toward which the perpetrator feels prejudice on the basis of a real or perceived difference in race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or national origin. Hate groups still exist from the oldest and most well-known the Ku Klux Klan, to the newest hate group organization the New Black Panther. The government and its citizens promote tolerance through public education and legislation. Hate crimes have become one of the main leading issues in the U.S. and need to be one of the government's top priorities. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), examines the influence of the victim's race in reporting hate crimes to the police. The NCVS can analyze how the victim's race influences the likelihood of reporting, the survey can explore the differences between reporting racial and non-racial hate crimes. According to the survey, the results indicate that minority victimizations are less likely to be reported for both racial and non-racial hate crimes and failure to report tot he police has serious consequences for the victim and the criminal justice system.

In 2006, 8,000 hate crime incidents were reported. The Bureau of Justice Statistics report found that over 200,000 individuals are victims of hate crimes each year and out of the other reported crimes, hate crimes were reported to be the least likely to not be reported by hate crime victims. Hate crimes also share characteristics that distinguish them from parallel offenses, or unbiased violent crime. Hate crimes against homosexuals. Hate crimes consist of assaults, sexual assaults, sexual harassments, and stalking were predictive of sexual orientation hate crimes. Hate crimes are an important social problem in contemporary U.S. society because it has been argued that hate crimes substantially impact the lives of the individual victims and the larger social context in which they occur and are bias-motivated aggressiveness constitutes a public health risk. The inclusion of sexual orientation in the federal hate crime law was rejected by the U.S. Senate in the late 1990s even while hate crimes targeting gays and lesbians increased during this same period. There is also very little information about known risk factors for hate-motivated crimes even in the case of race, where skin color and other physical features are relevant, no quantitative estimate exist that separate the impact of a race from other related risk factors.Is there a need for hate crime legislation?

Tougher hate crime laws are necessary to discourage racism and prejudice, yet opponents believe that tougher laws against hate crimes would infringe on free speech rights. There are many pros and cons when it comes to hate crime law arguments and concerns about these laws. For those who are against the idea of hate crime laws, they believe that the legislation is not needed because every crime the authorities cover is already illegal under existing state and local laws. They believe that the law is unfair because American justice is based on the principle that everyone is treated identically yet if hate crime laws are passed, perpetrators of two identical crimes would receive different sentences (depending on the characteristic of the victim. The opposers think that there is a political vehicle for the homosexual activist. If hate-motivated crimes against gays and lesbians are recognized in the law, then homosexuals would have a stronger moral claim to equal treatment in society and it will advance their claim that homosexual behavior is normal and natural.

Last but not least, federal hate crime legislation would increase federal government participation in law enforcement.Those who are for hate crime laws, they believe that legislation is needed to protect group under the law that will make the public aware that the group is vulnerable, extensively victimized in past and needs protection. They also believe that the law is fair because hate crimes have become more serious than any conventional crime because it abuses more than the immediate victim and is also a characteristic of a terrorist attack. Everyone needs protection from hate crimes and those who are for hate crime laws concluded that the law would not limit freedom of speech.Do we believe in free speech or not? Currently, the government is trying to combat what it sees as rising anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism means hostility to or prejudice against Jews. A country that ends up shutting down free speech often starts with the best of intentions. One man's hate crime is another man's conscientious expression of dissent, which lets a government that has already chosen sides to sort out which is which is a dangerous idea. Hate crimes that entail violence, threats of violence, or the destruction of property are acts that would be criminal even absent any motivation based on a bias against a protected group. Hate crime law results in few convictions and lots of disappointment.

In Texas, the tiny number of successful prosecutions leave both victims and lawmakers questioning state's commitment to punishing hate. For example, Lance Reyna was assaulted in a school bather in 2010. Reyna, who is transgender and gay, was a student at Houston Community College when an attacker held a knife to his throat, called him a queer' in a falsetto voice, then kicked and beat him and left him on the bathroom floor. A more recent incident, John Gaspari was walking home from a bar in Houston at around 3 a.m. on Valentine's Day 2015. He was three blocks from home when a car suddenly swerved onto the sidewalk, trying to run him over. Three men jumped out of the car and shouted, Get the fag! They tackled, punched, and kicked Gaspar. Then one of them pumped two bullets into him and left him unconscious on the side of the road.Prejudice people believe that hateful speeches are not the same as violence, because of this they can use freedom of speech to their advantage and can create anxiety about terrorism and national security. Hateful speeches can encourage a full-on massacre and can abuse others mentally and physically to others who are affected by it. Hate crime laws are necessary to discourage racism and prejudice because people who are part of a hate crime believes that they are above the law and cannot be stopped.

Hate crime is any crime committed which is motivated by bias or based on the victim's perceived membership in a specific group, such as race, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or religious beliefs and is intended to induce fear and cause psychological and/or physical harm (sometimes because of hate speech, yet hate speeches are not considered a hate crime).

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

What is the Meaning of Hate Crimes?. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Is Racial Profiling a Necessary Police Practice

Racial profiling, according to the Oxford Dictionary, is using a race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense. Most people are familiar with the tension in America today concerning law enforcement and racial profiling. This tension tends to be caused by the theory that the police force uses racial profiling to arrest people before crimes are committed. It is crucial to debate if there should be laws to prohibit racial profiling, or if this is the best course of action to keep our communities safe.

Imagine being a police officer and knowing that everyday there will be choices made that can affect someone's life- this is a hefty responsibility. Law Enforcement must look at a potential threat and make a split-second decision that will either benefit people or potentially disrupt an innocent person. Given statistics that indicate African Americans commit more crimes when police officers are put in this position, it makes sense that law enforcement would have a pre-determined disposition to look at individuals that fall under this category. The Center for Equal Opportunity's Roger Clegg states We have to recognize that it's going to be tempting for the police and individuals to profile so long as a disproportionate amount of street crime is committed by African Americans. (Racial Profiling: Is) This indicates that people in the minority need to evaluate what they can do to become less of a suspect to police officers. Essentially, if the whole minority cannot control the rate in which they are committing crimes, then they should not be surprised that the law enforcement finds them to be suspect. According to Info Base Learning, more crimes are committed in urban cities (Racial Profiling: Is). Typically, these cities are mostly populated by minorities. More crimes are committed in urban cities- which illustrates the point that these crimes would be committed by people of color. There also tends to be more crime that happens within cities than out in suburban America. This presents more reason to look towards the people who live there than outside sources.

The End Racial Profiling Act, otherwise known as ERPA, was introduced to Congress in 2015. (Conyers) This act is to fundamentally put the federal government into the issue by creating laws that protect people from being stopped because of the color of their skin. On one hand, this sounds great and makes it seem as if racism is being stopped in its tracks; however, that is not the case as most officers use racial profiling as an aid in addition to other key factors. These other factors include hours and hours of training to help police officers spot a threat. Inferences about a suspect must be connected before one just runs out and arrests someone because they are black. For example, if a man is black and appears to be holding a weapon there would be just cause to stop him. (Fauchon) Most, if not all of law enforcement, would agree with this above statement. This theory that racial profiling is for racist cops is incorrect and in fact insulting to minority police officers everywhere. A police officer would rather check on a gut instinct that a suspect has a weapon than be worried about appearing racist. This is a natural instinct of many officers and by putting restrictions on them with ERPA it would make it hard for officers to do their job without having a fear of losing it. Which would make it extremely difficult for anyone who serves people daily. Though there is more than one side to this argument.

While many believe that racial profiling is absolutely necessary, many believe that there is no room for it. There are arguments to be made saying that if police are targeting people based on their skin color, then they are racists and making assumptions that are not always supported with proof. Many suggest that targeting behavior is a better use of time than focusing on people with a skin color other than white. There could be many things that would be overlooked due to racial prejudice, which the United States Constitution clearly prohibits. Stated in the fourteenth amendment, people are guaranteed equal protection under the law to all citizens. Meaning everyone has the same rights, and there should not be one group who gets an exception to that. America is also founded on the belief that all are created equal. If this is true, racial profiling directly contradicts this. Racial profiling directly feeds into racism and this is an unacceptable practice to continue to allow. (Kowalski)

This idea of allowing racial profiling to continue also creates more tension between people of color and law enforcement. ("Racial Profiling: Is) There are many examples today of racially charged issues between the two groups. This creates this almost hatred between the two groups because of these examples. This can cause people of color to distrust the law enforcement- whose job is to protect them. As well as law enforcement to become more suspect of their actions. In both scenarios this creates a divide that would not be as evident if racial profiling did not. ERPA is needed to eliminate this policy of profiling. Benjamin Jealous, the NAACP president at the time, states that the policies to protect people of color is weak and hard to enforce. Overall, there needs to be some action to protect people who are not able to protect themselves because of racial prejudice.

Works Cited

Conyers, John. Text - H.R.1933 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): End Racial Profiling Act of 2015. Congress.gov, 15 May 2015, www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1933/text.

Fauchon, Christina. Counterpoint: The Case Against Profiling. International Social Science Review, vol. 79, 2004, Issue ??, pp.157-159. 3p.

Kowalski, Rev. Dr. James A. Everything Wrong With Racial Profiling. The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 25 June 2012, www.huffingtonpost.com/rev-dr-james-a-kowalski/whats-wrong-with-racial-profiling_b_1440307.html.

Racial Profiling | Definition of Racial Profiling in English by Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford Dictionaries | English, Oxford Dictionaries, en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/racial_profiling.

"Racial Profiling: Is Racial Profiling a Necessary Police Practice?" Issues & Controversies, InfoBase Learning, 3 Sept. 2012, https://icof.infobaselearning.com/recordurl.aspx?ID=2480. Accessed 1 Sept. 2018.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Is Racial Profiling a Necessary Police Practice. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

How did Westward Expansion of the United States Effect Chickasaw Culture

A proud group of people forced to move out of their home land and forced into a new life style. Changes that shift everything about who they are and the life style they once held so dear to them. The group at mention is the Chickasaw tribe of North America. This group of Native Americans inhabited the southeast regions of Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Alabama. During the 1830's this tribe along with many other Indian tribes were relocated forcefully to new locations because of new world expansion. These tribes were forced to move, and this research paper will look at what may have changed in their culture because of this forceful relocation. This paper will look at how the Chickasaw tribe was before, during, and after their relocation comparing the cultural changes and differences along the way and looking at what they may have gained or lost during this process.

Culture is what you call a specific groups way of life. This may include what they do, how they talk, rituals they may have, social behaviors, and languages, and these are just a few examples. Culture is very deeply rooted in people more than they may know, just like culture for the Chickasaws. Looking at how their culture was changed by the new United States will help educate us to prevent history from repeating itself while also giving us an inside look at their way of life and how it changed during the time of westward expansion.

Although much of the Chickasaw tribe's history is unknown due to lack of written documents what is known of them are stories passed down through their generations. The knowledge we have of them today starts when the first settlers arrived in the new world. One of the first known encounters with the tribe was made by Hernando de Sore who invaded their country in the month of November 1540 (History of the Chickasaw, Cushman, H.B., Debo, Angie). De Sore made demands that the Chickasaw people did not agree with and because of this they fought and killed many of his men and horses, causing chaos throughout most of his army, although the Chickasaws were eventually bested by De Sores superior technology they still did enough to cause problems for him. Even from when they were first discovered they had conflict with new settlers, but it is not because they wanted to but because they felt they were in the wrong and needed to defend what was theirs. This is just an example to show that it seems like this was the first of a lot of differences between the Chickasaw nation and explorers.

The Chickasaw nation is a proud group of people who at time could seem harsh, but always took care of their own and had a very rich culture. They are believed to have moved around the Mississippi river in prehistoric times and stayed there until their relocation in the 1830's. Surely through this forceful movement some of the Chickasaws long history of cultural beliefs must have changed. For example, Native American religions are not like the normal religions that we may think of, they are based off of sacredness. In the book American Indians of the Northeast and Southeast, by Kathleen Kuiper, she talks about the belief system of these native tribes. She states, indigenous religions tend to concern themselves more with degrees of sacredness. Everyone and everything are spirit- filled though not equally (Kathleen Kuiper, American Indians of the Northeast and Southeast). This is not an uncommon belief among many Native American tribes, especially for the tribes that lived in the same general area. Although many tribes may have had the same belief system they still had many other cultural differences, this is one reason why these tribes didn't combine into bigger ones. One of the major effects that the settlers of the new world had on the Chickasaw culture and on many other native tribes was that they tried to convert them to Christianity and other religions. Many of the settlers believed that Christianity was the superior religion and needed to be shared with the native people. Many missionaries worked to change the belief system of these tribes, but at this point the settlers still had little influence on the Native Americans and didn't have much luck. The Chickasaw tribe, along with others were here long before any settlers came into the new world but when the new settlers came it became too much for these tribes, especially when they began forming states and cities. These new settlers brought stuff to the new world that these natives had never seen and because of this the new settlers could manipulate and take what they wanted from the native people.

Before we get too in-depth about Chickasaw culture let's look at what western expansion is. Westward expansion could be perceived as everything explored west of Europe during the time of exploration, and while that is westward expansion, this paper will magnify the westward expansion of the United States. Magnify in this sense means to look at the westward expansion of the United States and hope for more land. The United States declared independence from England in 1776 and became their own country. Anita Yasuda states, Up to the early 1800s, most people in the United States lived along the Atlantic Coast. With the Louisiana Purchase, more and more settlers began moving westward (Westward Expansion of the United States, Anita Yasuda). The Louisiana Purchase was a land purchase by the United States from France and it was land west of the Mississippi river. Today is known as the mid-west and includes Arkansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Iowa, Missouri, and Kansas. Because of this new land the United States believed it was their God given right to explore and take over this land and this was known as Manifest Destiny. This led to a lot of people moving out west to start a new life for themselves, this is where the United states ran into land territory problems with Native American tribes. Many treaties were made during this time between the Native tribes and the United States over land territories. Although some treaties may have lasted a short while, most of the treaties were broken because of the United States greed for more land control and power. These broken promises led to a lot of conflict between the two and many battles happened over land because of it. Many tribes joined the British during the war of 1812 in hopes of reclaiming some of the land taken. At this time the Native American tribes were beginning to realize how important land was and what having land meant.

Native American tribes were mainly put into two groups. There were those who settled down and worked the land and hunted and gathered from the one spot they lived, known as sedentary farmers. These groups had more permanent living conditions like villages and none movable structures. There were also those groups who traveled and moved with the food they were hunting, this type of group lived mainly in tents and movable structures. These groups were known as nomads. The nomadic tribes' lives weren't as affected as much as the sedentary tribes in the beginning of the relocation, but it would affect where they could move later on. The two groups had two completely different types cultures, one believed it was necessary for the tribe to move to survive, while the other believed life is stable in a set place. The Chickasaw tribe was a semi nomadic tribe, which means they moved some but not a lot compared to a full nomadic tribe. The Chickasaw tribe along with many others were not as advanced as the new settlers, and in some cases, it was hard for them to keep up with the new way of life that the settlers were pushing on them.

As stated before, westward expansion was settlers in the United States who wanted to travel west for land and to start new lives. One of the major issues they ran into was land disputes with native American tribes. To solve this the president at the time, Andrew Jackson, proposed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The Indian Removal Act is described as, an act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states of territories, and for their removal west of the Mississippi (Indian Removal Act of 1830). Although the bill passed it was not a popular one and many believed that it was wrong to do this to the Indians. While others thought it was necessary for westward expansion. This not only effected the Chickasaw tribe but every native tribe east of the Mississippi. The United States kept expanding and pushing west and as they did they kept moving and relocating the Native tribes. Some of the tribes tried to fight back but because of their lack in technology compared to the U.S. they didn't have much luck. Although the Chickasaw tribe were known for their fighting skills it wouldn't have done much good fighting against the U.S. military.

This relocating and moving of the Native American tribes was given a name, and it was called the trail of tears. Many people were moved on the trail of tears not just the Chickasaw, over 40 groups and tribes (James W. Parins, Marion Blackburn, Full Scope of the Trail of Tears). Thousands of people were forced off of their home land and moved to wherever the United States decided to put them. The reason it was given the name trail of tears is because many people of the tribe lost their life and even for those who survived it was a very difficult journey. For the Chickasaw this new land they were moved to is now known as southeast Oklahoma. This was relatively close for the Chickasaw Indians, but other tribes weren't as lucky. Some tribes had to travel across the whole country to their new home. This removal act not only cost the country thousands of dollars, but it also cost many Native American lives. Some were unfit for the journey to begin with while other could handle some of the changing climates, because of this some groups could hardly start a new life. Many smaller tribes did not last long after relocation and some tribes got wiped out trying to stay and fight for their land. Even groups who made it to their new land had a hard time because of the new environment and climate they were put in. Naturally the elderly usually didn't survive these trips and at this time there wasn't much of written history of these tribes because everything about them was passed down through stories. The elderly were the ones who did most of the story telling and when the Chickasaw tribe and many other tribes lost them, they lost part of their history along with part of their culture.

Once the Chickasaw tribe was moved the United States government thought it was necessary to educate this tribe along with many others in the way that people of the U.S. learned. With this idea came the idea of boarding schools, schools that would teach these young Native American generations the way of the U.S. These schools were not on the reservations, and in some cases the U.S. government would use force to get these kids to go and would force parents to give up their children. They hoped to get the kids as young as they could because if they were young they weren't speaking the language of their people yet, so the boarding schools would teach them English. This may not seem bad at first but once these kids grew up and left boarding school and went back to their tribes they couldn't speak the language, so it was hard for them to stay. Historian Joseph Watras says these schools were not to teach the kids, Instead reforms reinforced the modernistic notions found in the mainstream society (Joseph Watras, Progressive Education and Native American Schools, 1929-1950). These types of schools were the United States way of trying to change a whole group of people in a way that seemed nice. These schools taught the kids the culture of most Americans in hopes they would forget their own culture.

Through this paper we have seen how the Chickasaw Tribe along with many others were very proud people who lived peacefully in land they thought would be theirs forever. During this time land was power and some people would do whatever it takes to get that power. In this case it was the removal of the Chickasaw tribe from their home land. To the United States the west was the great unknown and they needed to get it, the only thing standing in their way were the Native American tribes, but that wasn't going to stop them. Once the Indian Removal Act of 1830 passed it was open for the U.S. to do whatever they needed to do to the Indians to get this land. The U.S. relocated the Chickasaw tribe to a new location, the paths and ways to get to these new lands for these tribes became known as the trail of tears. Even when the Chickasaw tribe reached the new land set for them the U.S. was not done with them yet, they continued to try and change these people by taking them away from their tribe and trying to change their way of life and culture.

Culture is a very important part of a group of people's ways of life, it tells so much about a group and the people in it and in this case, it was the Native American tribe the Chickasaws. The lives of these people were reshaped and, in some cases, partially destroyed because of the lack of care that United States had for them. The changes this tribe went through is unbelievable and unforgettable. These people will never know what their lives would be like if they had never been moved, but we can hope to learn from this to prevent more cultures from being ripped apart and destroyed in the future.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

How Did Westward Expansion of the United States Effect Chickasaw Culture. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Westward Expansion to Cannibalism

In the hopes of traveling a straight ride to California is mislead by 81 inexperienced Donner Party emigrants. One of the many misunderstood tragic stories of all time. The need to travel and make shortcuts in life that only take us one step forward and two steps back. This only proves that the human mind can be very dangerous because, it is known to be the most horrible and misleading factors of an average human. The need to take the shortest route that led to a downfall, death and cannibalism, this is the Donner Party.

The most dramatic increase in pioneers that the United States experienced was in the year 1845. Pioneers were people who left their homes in the east just to travel west to California and the Oregon territories, this was known as the Westward Expansion. They used a trail that followed rivers by mountains in Wyoming, this was best for the wagons to move on. On the Oregon Trail from Independence, Missouri, most to all wagons used to the Continental Divide. This trip usually took around four to six months, just by traveling 15 miles a day. In 1846, two men crossed the Great Salt Lake Desert, both of them crossed without the assist from the wagons. During the time of the increased rates of the westward journey's, a man named Patrick Breen thought of California as a place to be free and express their catholic culture, but most of the Party members were really only inspired because of the Manifest Destiney. The Manifest Destiney was an 1845 philosophy that drove the 19th century U.S. territorial expansion. The Manifest Destiny also held that the United States was destinedby God, to expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent.

Headed west from independence, were about 500 wagons that left in the spring of 1845. Toward the rear of the train, a group wagons that had 32 emigrants of the Reed and Donner families, and even their employees left Illinois May the 12th. George Donner, the main leader of the Donner Party, was born in North Carolina, overtime he moved west from Kentucky to Indiana and then to Illinois. The same year as the start of the Donner Party, George was already 60 years of age and lived in Springfield, Illinois. With him was his five daughters; Frances, Georgia, Eliza, Elitha and Leanna, along with his 44-year-old wife Tamsen. George also had his brother Jacob, his wife Elizabeth, two stepsons, and five children join him. Hiram O. and his family also tagged along on with the Donner family. Milford Elliot, James Smith and Walter Herron were all three hired by the Reed family to drive the oxen.

In April of 1846, Lansford Hasting decided to try a new path for the thousands of emigrants to follow. This is called the Hastings Cutoff, a new and fast route to travel to California, this is the route the Donner Party soon traveled. None of the emigrants traveling to California knew that Hastings had never even traveled this new route himself. The emigrants took his advice not knowing that Hastings little shortcut would just add to their trip instead of shortening it, but they figure this out the hard way when they get snowed in on the Sierras.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Westward Expansion to Cannibalism. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Inventions from Westward Expansion

Introduction:

Do you like inventions?well,I'm going to tell you about three of the INVENTIONS that we have similarities to today.The telegraph,the steam boat and the steam locomotive.

Topic 1: The Telegraph

Samuel morse created the telegraph because he thought people needed a better way to communicate with each other since they didn't have computers.

Dots and dashes were used to code out the message and then translated to words for the person on the other end.

Although cellphones are cool the telegraph is cooler.Here's why!different dots and dashes were used to create the message.The messages were able to be decoded by an operator.

Topic 2: The Steamboat

The steamboat was created by Robert Fulton.The steamboat runs

On burnt wood or coal.The steamboat changed the way of life in the early 1800's.

It was the fastest way of water travel back then.The first steamboat was 45 feet long. The steamboat is propelled by steam power,paddlewheels or driving propellers.

Topic 3: The Steam Locomotive.

The steam locomotive was created in 1830.It transported goods much faster than by horse.People would know when and where their goods would arrive. The steam powered engine helped in move efficiently.It also helped it go faster.It also uses pulling power.It was created by George Stephenson and his son's company,Robert Stephenson and company.

The steam locomotive was created by George Stephenson and Richard Trevithick.It was created in 1830.It transported goods much faster than by horse.People would know when and where their goods would arrive.The steam powered engine helped it move more efficiently.

It also helped it move faster.

Conclusion

If you want to compare and contrast you can!As you can see I told you about three of the inventions that changed the world for us humans.The telegraph,the steamboat and the steam locomotive.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Inventions from Westward Expansion. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Westward Expansion on the Rise

Westward Expansion was a really important time in a America’samerican history. People were in the need of gGold and they wanted to start their new lives on a fresh page.

Manifest Destiny

Manifest Destiny was the belief that it was America’s believed it was there duty to stretch from the Pacific to the Atlantic. Do you believe it was there duty?

Manifest Destiny was caused by the fact that american people were connected to english civilization. It affected all the lives of lower class and middle class They believed there was prosperity waitinged for those who traveled west. They thought Manifest Destiny was all God’s Plan.

The 19th Ccentury doctrine or belief that the expansion of

The U.S carried throughout the american continents

wWas justified. Manifest Ddestiny carried on until WWI.

Transcontinental Railroad

Manifest Destiny was on the rise and people wanted to get to the west but they couldn't because they only had wagons and that took too long but then that all changed when they started building the Transcontinental Railroad. The Transcontinental Railroad took 7 years to build. The line length was 3,007 km and it crossed a whole continent. It was opened on May 10, 1869. The workers were mainly chinese immigrants looking for a job. They faced a lot of unfair treatment and discrimination. Before the Transcontinental Railroad was made it cost $1,000 to get across the country and now it cost $150. The Railroad met In Promontory, Utah. 50-150 workers died because of landslides and explosions. Thanks you to the Transcontinental Railroad now we can travel faster and ship more goods.

Homestead Act

The Homestead Act wereas several lLaws in the U.S which an applicant could rent land. ThHe Homestead Act is nonexistent because the act got repealed. But it allowed any man or women a free chance.Opened settlement in the Western U.S. Freed Slaves could also but land. It was $18 for 160 acres of land. When they got the land they had to make sod houses. To get land you had to do a land run. It provided limited protection of the value of the house. The Homestead Act helped a lot of people not be in poverty and actually gave them a chance.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Westward Expansion On The Rise. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

America Desire to Migrate West

The Westward Expansion was America desire to migrate west and use the land that was either not yet claimed, or claimed by other countries and they wanted to make it theirs. In the midst of the 1800's, the citizens of America packed up all of their things, and headed out West to the new-found lands of America, where no one else has traveled before. The Western Expansion was an extraordinary bit of the improvement of the United States since it gave Americans new land to settle, expanded its economy, and gave the United States more power to be figured with. ?»? Countless individuals moved, making future urban areas like San Francisco and Denver. The fulfillment of the transcontinental railroad associated the Atlantic and Pacific coasts made headway on the shipment of goods and merchandise across the country. Western homestead items like wheat, corn, meat, and poultry were delivered east to bolster the developing number of specialists in industrial facilities in urban areas like Philadelphia, Boston, and New York. The expansion in land, common assets, and industry gave the United States a bigger role as a country.

Motives After the revolution, the winning of independence, opened up the Western nation and was consequently trailed by a consistent stream of pioneers to the Mississippi valley. In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson bought the domain of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase extended from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it multiplied the extent of the United States at that time. By 1840, 10 new states had been added to the west. All parts of the valley aside from Wisconsin and Minnesota were all around populated. Subsequently a radical new segment had been colonized with enduring consequences for the American establishments, beliefs and methods for living. The far west was the place that is known for high mountains, deserts, interesting rock arrangements, splendid hues and gigantic separation. Hide exchange with Europe had now turned into a rewarding business and the hide brokers turned into the pathfinders for the pioneers. Movement was currently conceivable by the disclosure of ways over which bull driven trucks could be driven through looking for mountains and over the western desert. Individuals needed to move far from the stuffed urban communities and this prompted the relocation into the uninhabited terrains. Expanded transportation like streets, railways and trenches and their development made an interest for shabby work making it simpler for individuals to land positions currently, conversely with the urban areas where there was joblessness.

The subject of regardless of whether slavery would be permitted in the new western states shadowed each discussion about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had endeavored to determine this inquiry: It had conceded Missouri to the association as a slave state and Maine as a free state, safeguarding the delicate parity in Congress. In any case, the Missouri Compromise did not have any significant bearing to new regions that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, thus the issue of servitude kept on rotting as the country extended. The Southern economy became progressively subject to ""Ruler Cotton"" and the arrangement of constrained work that supported it. In the mean time, an ever increasing number of Northerners came to trusted that the extension of servitude encroached upon their very own freedom, both as citizens??“ the expert subjection larger part in Congress did not appear to speak to their interests.

Regardless of this sectional clash, Americans continued relocating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was embraced. A large number of individuals crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which had a place with Great Britain, and thousands increasingly moved into the Mexican regions of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American pilgrims in Texas won autonomy from Mexico. They appealed to join the United States as a slave state.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

America Desire to Migrate West. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Racial Profiling: Know your Rights

Over the past years, racial profiling by police officers has become a great issue in this country. It has been the reason of many issues that have resulted in many traffic stops and created tensions between the communities that ended very badly. But even more specific, racial profiling on the highways is an extensive and ongoing problem that was going on in Arizona. According to the research study, there is traffic records that prove that Arizona's Department of Public Safety officers were searching black and Latino drivers at much higher and double the rates than white drivers. (Pierson et al., 2017). Regardless of the searching inconsistency, state troopers did find contraband at almost equal rates without taking into consideration the drivers ethnicity. The data was collected by the Stanford Research study that examined the traffic stops that occurred in twenty states in which they found and analyzed similar search trends that were happening extensively in the United States.

According to the study, the sheriff's office in Maricopa County, it has called the attention of the public by their high racial profiling abuses that were going on for quite some time. The Department of Public Safety troopers, have searched Latino drivers in that county at a much higher rate than white drivers. To their surprise it was the second- highest search in the state. While traffic stops happened in that county, Latinos were searched through 10 percent of the routinely traffic stops, African-American drivers were searched for 8 percent of the time, while white drivers were only searched during less than 4 percent of the routinely traffic stops. (Pierson et al., 2017). It was found that Latino drivers in Maricopa County were the ones that were least likely to have contraband such as drugs or weapons in their possession and vehicles, but it was not surprising at all to find, that Latino drivers were still the ones that were being stopped and searched more frequently.

When it comes to these traffic stops, there is the hit rate and search rate which according to Daniel Wallace, an associate professor at Arizona State University school of Criminology and Criminal justice, there is a difference between the two that are essential when it comes to analyzing if there is bias while they are conducting these traffic stops and searches. At the end of the day when the DPS officers that are making these traffic stops are done doing the searches and don't end up finding anything illegal in the vehicle searches, that is when it a concern of racial profiling starts to unfold. According to Wallace, that is when they have to look at why DPS officers are searching drivers and what exactly are the suspicions or motives that they have, but also looking closely to see if the suspicions they are getting are involved with some kind of racial stereotype and how they are using these assumptions to predict whether drivers are illegal or have something illegal in their vehicles.

When the Department of public Safety in Arizona was asked to give comments based on the Stanford data that was collected, they just gave a brief statement they wrote in an email. According to Bert Graves, the spokesperson of the Department they do not know the specific methods that are being used by the officers so they can't really say anything about that only that the departments mission statement is not devoted to doing biased policing but rather doing actions that will have all the people that come in contact with the officers, to be treated with courtesy and respect (Pierson et al., 2017). Which is nothing compared to all the complains and findings of racial profiling gathered by the Stanford data research. In a situation like this it is ignorant not to acknowledge what the findings are suggesting when it comes to using racial profiling as a tactic stop drivers based on how they look to determine their legality in the united states and automatically stereotyping them by thinking they have something illegal in their vehicles.

The researchers at Stanford collected the data in a strong attempt to document all the officer's interactions with the drivers, taking a closer look at what was really happening in those 10 to 15-minute conversations. The differences in search rates between white and nonwhite drivers were very noticeable in some of the counties located in Arizona. According to Sharad Guel, one of the authors of the study, black drivers in the counties of Apache, Navajo, and Greenlee, they were stopped and searched at greater rates, including Latino drivers that were on the highway of Pinal and Yavapai counties. The results showed that white drivers throughout the state were only searched 3 percent of the time while conducting the traffic stops. Whereas, black, and Latino drivers at the time of traffic stops were searched up to 7.5 percent of the time.

According to Alessandra Soler, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Arizona, there is still much more to do with these police departments in the state of Arizona. She also mentions that there is very little effort from the police department's side to address the issues of systematic racism and finding a way to train their officers into a racial bias training. Action was taken when the American Civil Liberties Union decided to put a stop to the issue and filed a class action lawsuit against the Department of Public Safety in Arizona back in 2001. This was in an effort to take action against the racial profiling cases that were only getting greater with Latino and Black drivers in the state of Arizona. This resulted in an agreement that required DPS officers to keep records of all the stops they made and, also recording them using the patrol car video systems that will help keep track of very traffic stop.

The results of the study show that nothing much has really changed based on the Stanford Data that was collected last year. It even seems that things got worse after the lawsuit since the searching rates in Black and Latino drivers went up to 10 percent when it used to be at 7.5. In Maricopa county from 2011 to 2015 black drivers were stopped and searched at a higher rate of 8 percent more than past years. Latino drivers that were in traffic stops from 2011 to 2015 was the highest, reaching up to 10 percent.

Racial profiling is clearly a sensitive subject that should be properly addressed and to take the right measures to stop this racial bias from going on in the state of Arizona and in every other state. It is not only dehumanizing but it is humiliating and disrespectful for the people facing this denigration. There is no way an officer can have the right to use assumptions and predictions to know someone's legality in the United States. Also, to stop assumptions of whether someone is illegal or dangerous by the color of their skin or the way they look. They should enforce the use of racial bias training for police departments to eliminate these patterns of thinking and discriminatory behavior.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Racial Profiling: Know Your Rights. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Americas Westward Expansion and Manifest Destiny

During the early years of the United States, many thought that expansion was vital to the young nations survival. Early states were strategically located along the eastern seaboard which allowed for trade to flow easily, however many started to question what profit may come out of the vast interior land that had yet to be explored. As the nation's population was rapidly increasing, large cities such as Boston and New York city quickly became crammed and over populated. This overpopulation led to ideology that expanding the nation on a westward course could be useful and potentially profitable. Native Americans, however had already held this land for hundreds of years and strongly disliked colonials intruding upon it. As Americans began moving into the land and seeing how profitable the land could actually be whether through fur trade or through hunting and farming they began to feel like religion might have been the cause for their great success. This coined the ideas for what we know today as manifest destiny. According to the SAAM in their article Americanexperience.si.edu, the phrase manifest destiny originated in the nineteenth century, however the ideology was developed in the seventeenth century with the first European immigrants, more specifically, English Puritans or protestants. Manifest destiny, at its basic core refers to the ideas that one's survival in America or on any new land in general was dependent on God's approval. Although manifest destiny played a large role in the expansion of America, it simply would not have been as widespread if the things our founding fathers such as Thomas Jefferson did would have been complete. The Louisiana purchase made Americans eager to set out and explore after the discoveries of Lewis and Clark.

The Louisiana purchase, in 1803 nearly doubled all land that was previously owned by the nation. More importantly, however, was the new control over the Mississippi river. The transaction took place under president Thomas Jefferson, who believed that westward expansion was key to the nation's health. Jefferson also believed that virtue played a major role in whether the small interior farms or not would succeed he wrote those who labor on earth are the chosen people of God'. While Jefferson believed that this expansion was vital, others whom opposed his administration claimed that this was a sign of greed and that the nation was already large enough.

Jefferson's ideas that the farmers were the people of God spread, and most importantly encouraged many new people to move to the west whether it be the new immigrants or people who had been here since their childhood or even born here. Although some may have opposed the expansion, his ideas spread, even through politics which we see plays a big role in future administrations and policies. The ideas of manifest destiny and its role in westward expansion, also contribute greatly in the future of the nation through future political leaders. Many future leaders will push for expansion and believe once again that it is vital for the nations survival. The first major piece of evidence we see for this is from James Monroe in the Monroe doctrine. James Monroe, through this document is extremely close to making manifest destiny a policy. The policy that was created put European nations at notice that the United States would in fact defend other Western Hemisphere nations from further colonization.

Although the ideas of westward expansion were extremely widespread and mostly excepted, many issues remained. The debate over slavery, and whether it would be allowed in these new states or not was a force that many thought would shred apart the nation. The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed for the people of the new states to decide for themselves whether slavery would be permitted or not. When the act first passed, a huge wave of people rushed to the territory so that they could take their position on slavery. The war over slavery continued throughout the adding of new states and was deepened when the Republic of Texas was annexed through the Mexican War. The United states gained vast amounts of land throughout this war but most importantly the land of Texas. Another agreement with Britain gave the nation possession of a portion of the Oregon territory. Throughout all of this new land, dispute was still heavy on whether or not slavery should be legal or not there. This problem would not be completely solved until after the American Civil war and the passing of the 13th Amendment, which prohibited slavery.

The War of 1812, allowed Americans to freely move, once the war was over. Although the war was primarily fought between the British and American's, the native American forces allied with the British to fight against the Americans. The United States wanted the British colonial holdings in Canada, which they did not get. Post war, the borders remained the same neither country truly won, however, there was a clear looser, the native Americans. A great native American ruler named Tecumseh who allied with the British was killed at the battle of Thames. The tribes power was greatly reduced and almost disappeared post war. The tribe was vulnerable to the Americans looking for expansion after the British forces broke their promises to help defend their territory and retreated to Canada. Prior to the war, American expansionist who were travelling west, were often attacked by native Americans. After the war, these tribes were either shrunk down in size so much that their force would not hurt settlers, or they were pushed further west. Either of the two allowed for further west land to be settled.

On May 28, 1830 president Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal act into law. The new law, had great impacts on the five majorly civilized tribes, the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Muscogee-creek, and the Seminole. Until this act was passed, these five tribes were able to acts as independent nations, living on American soil. The acts put pressure on the Indian chiefs to move their tribes further west, if they did not do so, they would be forcefully removed from the territory. The first tribe to sign a treaty and remove themselves was on September 27, 1830, the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek. The treaty removed all Choctaws east of the Mississippi river in exchange for some money, but primarily land in Oklahoma. The journey out of the occupied land into Oklahoma was brutal on the Indians, the journey is now referred to as the trail of tears. Tension between the Indians and settlers had always been present, however, in a time of a Gold-rush, such as the one in Georgia in 1829 pushed settlers over the edge and encouraged them into supporting the Indian Removal act. Many Indians who were forced into forts while settlers moved in died. The number, over 4,000 native American deaths in a relatively short period of time.

Another factor that weighed in on Americas expansion was the Oregon trail and territory. The area referred to as the Oregon territory is considered all land from the northern border of California into Alaska. The territory was so vital to the nation because it included a major port to the Pacific Ocean, and an outpost on the Puget sound. The land was formerly held by the Spanish, although they didn't occupy the whole area, they did hold it. John Quincy Adams, dreamed that the nation would stretch from the Atlantic to the Pacific and was willing to fight for that to become a reality. He threatened Spain and pressured them into signing the Transcontinental treaty. The treaty granted America land north of California and set the southern border on the northern border of California, however, it did not set a boundary of the northern border in present day Alaska. This treaty encouraged men and women to move west into the largely unsettled land that had just become acquired. Manifest destiny played a big role in this expansion as people migrated into the land and it proved to be profitable they gave all glory to God. The more profitable and successful the men and women became the more they truly believed they were destined by God to be profitable off of this new land. The territory was difficult to reach, since no transcontinental rail road had been put into place yet. The territory was most easily reached by four pathways which are the Santa Fe Trail, which led into the Southwest. The Overland trail into California, the Oregon trail into the northwest, and the Mormon trail that led into the Great Salt Lake, which is present day Utah, are the other three trails which proved to be the simplest ways to reach the western land. Although these trails were the only way to reach the land, they were very dangerous and brutal, with that in mind, the government started to discuss the possibility of a transcontinental railroad that could reach the western land. In the presidential election of 1844, James Polk won the presidency and on the forefront of his agenda was national expansion. In March of 1845, a British ambassador rejected Polk's offer to divide Oregon on the 49th parallel. Polk was infuriated with his decision and demanded the entire territory and include northern reaches setting the border to the 54-40 line. This sparked resistance and ultimately pushed the forces to the verge of war, however, they were able to compromise and agreed to split the territory along the 49th parallel in exchange for navigation of the Columbia river.

Although the war of 1812 contributed greatly to America's expansion, the Mexican-American war was more vital, because of the land it granted the new nation. Prior to the Mexican-American war, Texas had already won its independence from Mexico. Former president, John Tyler, was a great supporter of manifest destiny secretly sent a diplomat, John Slidell to Mexico City to talk about purchasing present-day reaches of land in California, New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, and many other states, when Mexican officials found out he was there to try and purchase land instead of compensating them for Texas, they quickly turned Slidell away and sent him home. The American government quickly realized that Mexico was not up for negotiating and realized that if they wanted this land they had to fight for it. Polk, then sent Zachary Taylor and a few of his troops to the Rio Grande which was considered the highly disputed southern border to pressure Mexico. On April 25, 1846, the United States troops encountered a Mexican force who killed 11 Americans and captured and held the rest. Polk, used this as the basis of his argument for congress to declare war upon the Mexicans. War was disputed, some thought this would allow for the southern president to expand slavery into any new territory acquired. On May 13, 1846, America was officially at war with Mexico. Early in the war, the United States was victorious throughout all battles. Although fighting had stopped much early with vast success by the Americans, it was officially over February 2nd, 1848, when the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed. This treaty acknowledged Texas as its own entity, and ceded all present-day land of California, Nevada, and Utah. The treaty also gave the United States land that would contribute to the size of the states of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and even Wyoming for 15 million dollars.

The California gold rush may have been the biggest force that drove many Americans off of the eastern sea board to west of the Mississippi river all the way across the continent to the Pacific Ocean. Not only did Americans rush to find their fortune, but people from all over the world, from Mexico, Peru, the Pacific islands, and even Europe, most notably France. James Marshall was one of the first to find gold at the foothills of the mountains near present day Sacramento, California. Marshall wished to keep this a secret but word quickly spread through printed newspaper. Soon people from all over the globe would be rushing to this newly acquired land. An estimated 300,000 people had come to California in search of gold by 1855. In the year of 1849 alone, an estimated 90,00o people had come into the state searching for riches, they were given the nickname the forty-niners. The gold rush helped to develop a stable outpost for Americans wishing to settle in western land. It also helped develop a booming industry and allowed for great population growth and development of a new state. The gold rush, allowed California to transform from a military occupied Mexican territory into a state under the American government. California was granted official statehood in the compromise of 1850. California's gold rush allowed for men to make many new discoveries and was a major outpost for the late Klondike gold rush. The Klondike gold rush spanned from reaches in Canada into present day Alaska. Over 100,000 men rushed into the area in search of gold, only one-third of the men finished the journey, and an even smaller percentage finding gold.

Although all of the following were extremely influential in the development of land west of the Mississippi river, the transcontinental railroad was the single most important. Without the transcontinental railroad, the new land would not have been populated in the same fashion. The transcontinental railroad allowed for men to travel with their families, most importantly women and children. The railroads allowed for Americans to settle the western land the same way the British did with their colonization patterns, in contrast the French and Spanish were only searching for riches when colonizing. In 1845, Asa Whitney proposed the idea of a railroad that could span across the United States, Whitney was a merchant who had recently traveled to Europe and experienced the ease of travel and transport on the rail cars. Congress liked the idea and eventually passed an act to help transportation in 1862. The plan was for the first of five future railroads to be developed. The Acts issued land grants and government bonds to the Union and Central Pacific railroads. In 1856, a bill was proposed based on the fact that the railroads would create a bond between eastern and western states during a time of war, this would also help during the Civil war. Although the acts were passed earlier and funding was available, work didn't start until January of 1863. At this time, the Central Pacific started working on their rail lines in Sacramento, California. Work was slow due to a shortage of employees because of the civil war. Many of the Central Pacific railroad's employees were Asian immigrants who were formerly in search for riches during the gold rush. The Union Pacific faced many of the same problems, they didn't start working on their lines until December of 1863, in Omaha, Nebraska. Although they began working two years prior, the first rail hadn't been laid until July of 1865. Since the company was off to a late start, they were able to corral more workers since the civil war had come to an end, many of their workers were veterans or Irish immigrants.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Americas Westward Expansion and Manifest Destiny. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Lewis & Clark Expedition

Introduction

Today I am going to tell you about lewis and clark and the louisiana purchase I am going to tell you there adventure and what happened on their journey about the people they met and other things and another thing i will be telling you about the louisiana purchase and more details about the westward expansion.

Who were Lewis and Clark

In 1803 president thomas jefferson purchased the west coast land from france. At first france said no but france needed the money so they gave the land to america.So in 1804 the purchased was named the louisiana purchased the purchase was 1.8 million dollars so he hired 2 men named meriwether lewis and william clark and a group named corps to explore the land .But the journey would be dangerous but on there way there they climbed mountains and they got sick but for the first month they had help so when they got there clark kept a daily log and recorded the people he saw and met. Clark was assigned to make the map and he discovered more than 3,000 species and they found and met this indian tribe the leader's name was sacagawea. She showed them the land and helped them and one day she was kidnapped so lewis and clark adopted her children a few years later lewis and clark died

Louisiana purchase

There was a land purchase between the us and france.In 1803 the third president of the united states bought half of the west coast land from france. So First france turned down the offer but france needed the money so france Came back and said yes to the offer. So in 1804 President Jefferson bought the Land so he sent two men to explore .The land the had 15 stats in it like Oklahoma, Kansas,Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, and more President Jefferson bought the Land so he sent two men to explore .The land the had 15 stats in it like Oklahoma, kansas, nebraska, minnesota,iowa, and mor

Lewis and clark expedition 2 men named meriwether lewis and william clark and a group named corps was hired to explore the land of the west but the journey would be dangerous. On there way there they climbed mountains and they got sick but for the first month they had help. So when they got there clark kept a daily log and recorded the people he saw and met clark was assigned to make the map and he discovered more than 3,000 species.And they found and met this indian tribe the leader's name was sacagawea she showed them the land and helped them and one day she was kidnapped .So lewis and clark adopted her children a few years later lewis and clark died.

Closing

I have now told you everything about lewis and clark and the louisiana purchase this is all the info you need to know about lewis and clark i hope you enjoyed my topic on the westward expansion.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Lewis & Clark Expedition. (2019, Nov 18). Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/page/8/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay
Stop wasting your time searching for samples!
You can find a skilled professional who can write any paper for you.
Get unique paper