Month: June 2019
The Life of Discriminated
It was a hot sunny day, when a couple of fellas named Lennie and George were running out the town of Weed. They traveled all around, both kept the gear they took rolled up on their backs. They made it quite a bit then found another work place to start steak. They finally got hired back somewhere and George let Lennie know not to talk to anybody or do anything. Lennie has a disability, to where he cant function he cant realize his own strength. In John Steinbeckr's novel, of Mice and Men, Steinbeck uses discrimination to express how Lennie, Crooks, and Curley's wife got treated..
Lennie is discriminated against because he has a mental disability. George says Dont mess with her sher's gonna stir up some trouble. George talks to Lennie likes her's helpless, Lennie had some kind of disorder but he was big and strong. Lennie started traveling with George when his Aunt Clara had passed away, and George looks after him and tries to keep him out of trouble. They drink from rivers which is dirty but Lennie is so stupid he cant comprehend.
Crooks is discriminated against because her's black. He says Well I got a right to have a light, you go on get out of my room. I ain't wanted in the bunkhouse and yall aint wanted in here.Crooks was separated, he has his own little room in the back of the barn. Her's black and lonely, and lets people know when they aint wanted. Consequently all the while people are in the bunkhouse and her's out there. This was before civil rights and when blacks were treated more like slaves. They was dirty and did everything asked of and he could not be with the white people.
Curleyr's wife is discriminated because she has no freedom. She has no freedom cause she got married so she could leave home. But her husband dont want her out by his workers, her husband expects her to stay in the house all day. She cried, aint I got a right to talk to nobody? Her face grew angerlie, what's the matter with me.Lennie - the disorder one was petting his puppy he got through it and she caught him why he was alone. She came in and sat right next to him, she flirted with every guy there and George let Lennie know not to talk to her. George let him know shell stir up trouble. Earlier in the story she came by the bunkhouse while her husband was off somewhere. She tried flirting and they let her know she was not allowed in their bunkhouse. You could call her a whore and she was young about 16-17 years old.
In John Steinbeckr's novel, of Mice and Men, Steinbeck uses discrimination to express how Lennie, Crooks, and Curley's wife felt. Steinbeck's essay tells how all the characters felt throughout the story. Steinbeck wrote about discrimination so that we can see how they wasnt all treated equally. For instance, Crooks was black so he couldnt sleep where white people lay their heads. Lennie got bossed around because he had some kind of disorder. Curleyr's wife was forced to stay in the house and talk to no other men then her husband.
Cite this page
The Life of Discriminated. (2019, Jun 12).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
The Treatment of College Athletes
What is the actual purpose for college sports? Although college has always been considered a stepping stone on an individual’s path to achieving their full potential, the question of just how to make the time itself in college useful is rarely asked.
College athletes are currently attend university with their attention torn between both their academic life and their sports career. Students could be part of 24 possible programs, from their football team, field hockey, water polo, all the way to gymnastics. The number of student athletes registered with the NCAA is currently 460000. In this paper we hope to verbalize the increasing costs of being a college athlete, and the relative pay as a result.
Even with athletes on a scholarship receive an education valued at 60,000 a year and is constantly increasing, Scholarships have slowly become commodity products, often having an actual value that is heavily dependent on the activities of the student and is not equivalent to receiving a cash value equal to the value of their scholarship.
College students need to live a very different lifestyle from the average student. Whether or not the actual college athlete is actually on scholarship, the university system is not taking the proper steps to educate their athletes on what they are signing up for. Between the psychological pressure that can be felt from students and alumni on their performance, efforts to be a professional, or the limitations on other activities, students that are athletes need extra warning from the university about what they are giving up.
The psychological warfare of sports is something that is not talked about at either the professional or the college level. It is now something that the population takes for granted as a given. In some ways it is, if you are going to be in the public eye, then you are going to take public scrutiny. In no other public activity is an individual constantly being watched than public sports. There are more statistics, and coverage for the individual members of the NFL than there is for members of congress. Aside from the position of President of the United States, these athletes take on an extreme amount of pressure, and they start on this path in college as young as 18.
Taking an individual that is less in a sport that might not be properly appreciated by the public, they are still under pressure from their fellow athletes. They are competing to maintain a quality of performance that allows them to continue to play their activity. The amount of effort that they put in over what is really their entire life can be squandered by an injury, or by being overshadowed by another player. The sheer competition between their teammates is at a high level, independent of the social pressure between players to also work together as a team. A player at any sport has to deal with these problems, but these are enough to consume the thoughts, cause restless nights thinking through the problems, or emotional stress from worrying about that freshman behind you wanting your scholarship.
A student that will have even more pressure under them is the student that participates in mainstream sports such as football, basketball, or soccer. These students all have a chance at being professional athletes as division 1 athletes. If the students are in a lower division, they will still feel the pressure of the alumni that are subsidizing their scholarships, the students, and the weight of representing their school. Every game is a memory that you will have to live with, and the amount of “what ifs?” can increase more rapidly than one can believe. Their stats will be posted everywhere, and the pro scouts will know of every own goal, fumble, or free throw percentage you keep in your 4 long years at school.
The last group of student athletes are not on the same plain as normal students at all. This is not because they are much different, but the mood, hope, and fan base rely on them for results. Some of these players are the main 7 of a basketball teams, the lead wide receivers, safeties, running backs, and quarterback of the football team, and the start forward, midfield, defender, and goalkeeper of the soccer team. Many of these players names are in the minds of students for their tenure at the school, as well as alumni and for some, ESPN broadcasters.
These are the athletes that bring in money for the university and are under immense pressure to do so. The difference between the change in a school between having a top 25 program, and missing the mark, has an impact on attendance numbers as well as the students on campus.
These athletes are under scrutiny from people all over the country, and are sometimes, such as the recent bowl game season, the number one thing in America to watch. Football players will be talked about for the entire fall semester, and social media pressures are no help. Student athletes are merely expected to ignore the calls for replacements, the insults because of missed kicks, passes, or turnovers. The hostility that an athlete is susceptible to is above and beyond that of an amateur, despite NCAA claims.
With all of that in mind, take one of the players on the teams of the March Madness Tournament. They are 5 games from the 2nd most prestigious award in the game. What exactly is the probability that they are focused on their Calculus II class? All of the players are being watched, talked about and scrutinized for a month straight. It is as it is called, absolute madness. Sports media covers all of the games in depth, and if they happen to not get to one of the 64 teams, there is a large population of alumni and current students watching. Student athletes are being put under such a large amount of pressure, the amateur argument used by the NCAA is proven less true year after year.
With all of this in mind, the practice schedule on top of all of this psychological stress and the traveling necessary to be part of college sports is time consuming and takes away what little study time they would be able to achieve if they were able to look past the pressure. One of the most important things for a college student is not only completing their academic program at a high level, but experimenting with their interests and their mind. Students should be set to not to step off the assembly line of diploma receiving students with just a piece of paper, but a more developed and unique mind. These athletes are likely foregoing internships for summer practice, and trips abroad for them in-school practice requirements. If they start falling behind in any way, they could lose the spot they worked all their lives to earn.
The students work for 4 years in these programs, and generate revenue for the university. Two sports generate large amounts of revenue, football and men’s basketball. Other sports such as women’s basketball,men’s lacrosse, and men’s and women’s soccer, can generate small amounts of revenue, but are minuscule compared to men’s basketball and football.
Professional sports organizations, schools, the NCAA, and sports conferences all benefit from the profit after scholarships for these athletes. Universities also receive large amounts of funding for their school through donations from alumni, many of which donate towards these sports teams.
The NCAA’s claim that these students are amateur athletes might be true for the non-revenue generating athletes, but there are certain sports that can generate large sources of profit for these “non-profit” entities.
Some of these students come from the most difficult circumstances. Although scholarship money is very beneficial for their financial future, the quality of their education is diminished by their sport. This can even be seen in pop-culture with specials on how these athletes train constantly, and academic study is far from first on their priority list.
Only the best athletes in the most lucrative sports move on to a professional league. The financial benefits of sacrificing attention on the athlete’s education is an illogical conclusion from a financial perspective. Another important factor to consider is the risk of injury. In professional sports, there is a requirement that a player must play in a developmental or college league upon entering the professional sports league of their respective sport. What if a player suffers a career ending injury during the year of playing college sports? What about the millions of dollars he was guaranteed in the pros? This has also played a role in shaping the controversy of whether or not these players should be compensated, due to risk of injury and ultimately never reaping the the financial benefits that you plan to recieve after bringing in immense revenue for a specific school and sports program. Now that there is an understanding of the financial pros and cons of the “pay-to-play” controversy that has been amidst our nation, it is important to analyze some possible solutions.
The first solution entails listing college athletes, similar to any other job, based on their fair market value. This would mean superior athletes that are expected to be professional athletes will be listed for higher prices, while the less known, mediocre players will be listed for a lesser salary. Although this could potentially prove to be beneficial, it brings about too many risks. By enlisting athletes for their fair market value based upon the coverage and revenue that player or team brings to the university, it would bring about many disparities in income. Firstly, men sports programs would be compensated much greater, due to their popularity among the rest of the population and how much revenue events like March Madness and the Rose Bowl bring in. Not only would there be an immense wage gap between men and women college athletes, there would also be major disparities between the different sports programs.
Due to media coverage and popularity, football, basketball, and baseball are without question the programs that bring in the most revenue, so their players would be compensated much greater than players on the rowing or gymnastics team. After careful analyzation of this controversy and some financial barriers that the NCAA must overcome, our group came up with a opinion on how to potentially solve this problem within the United States. Although this may arise controversy, a potentially amicable solution would be to pool a percentage of all the revenue gained from all of the sports programs within the college. After the percentage is pooled, one solution could be to invest the funds into low-risk portfolios that would create a gain and then have dividends issued to the players. Another potential solution would be instead of investing the funds, create trust fund accounts of equal value for all student athletes, that can be accessed upon graduation or one year in the college sports program. Although this compensation wouldn't be too large due to it being equally distributed across athletes, it provides some financial protection and incentive to these athletes who ultimately are the ones making the NCAA a billion dollar industry.
Ultimately, the current state of the NCAA demands change. Change that will take into consideration not only the physiological commitments these student athletes faced, but as well as the immense revenues these sports programs bring in without the athletes seeing a dollar of it. If we want to provide an environment that will act as a transition from the college sports leagues to the professionals, there must be solutions made to contribute to the financial protection and psychological protection of these young athletes.
Works Cited
- Student-Athletes. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ncaa.org/student-athletes
- Chait, J. (2018, March 31). How to Pay College Athletes Without Ruining NCAA Sports. Retrieved from https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/03/how-to-pay-college-athletes-without-ruining-ncaa-sports.html
Cite this page
The Treatment of College Athletes. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Classification of College Athletes
In college there are numerous of sports that individuals can get involved with,although every player has their different reasons for why they play the sport they have one thing in common they are a College Athlete and they are competitors. As an easygoing peruse of the games' area of this daily paper, the community witnesses numerous articles portraying the triumphs of neighborhood competitors. Be that as it may, seldom do these articles depict the genuine competitor behind the achievement. Competitors come in a wide range of sizes and shapes. They extend from the amazingly capable to the frightfully clumsy. Some athlete work well with their teammates and they understand the importance of sportsmanship, whereas others would rather work alone to receive all the fame from the success of the team. Certain competitors search out consideration from the general population around them while others are humble and remain out of sight. All, in all there is a variety of competition style in college athletes, which can be classified different categories which include detail of each competitor that the local paper may not include.
Beginning with the Most Valuable Player, this competitor is one who was given the endowment of regular physicality. This individual sits on a pedal stool, and mostly likely known for being the Pro Athlete on campus. They are known as the "MVP" of their peers, family, and community. Frequently, they are three game competitors who do truly well in each. They don't need to fill in as hard as others to have the capacity to have relative accomplishment as they are frequently normally solid and skilled. Numerous other individuals severely dislike these competitors since they have every one of the instruments they have to succeed. Competitors of this caliber usually believe that academically they should not have to worry because they apart contribute their talent to the school ;therefore, the teachers and administrative staff should work together to pass them. According to the Making Connection: Data informed practices in academic support centers, "they found that students in their study became over involved in the athletic domain, which left no time to devote to academic and social experiences. In fact, the author, Eddie Comeaux, found that student athletes actually entered college with high aspirations for their academic experience in college however, the demands of playing a sport led to role engulfment early as their first and second semester of college(pg.24). There is no certification that these competitors will be great colleagues or have great hard-working attitude, however, mentors can be guaranteed that these individuals are an extraordinary place to expand upon and make a group around.
Next there is the athlete who emerges as the skipper of the group by helping their kindred partners and dealing with their group. They are a balanced competitor, genuinely gifted at their game, yet more significantly great at rousing their group to perform to the best of their capacity. This competitor is the foundation of the group and without them disorder could undoubtedly break out. Alternate competitors admire this pioneer and take after their requests. At the point when your group is losing, the pioneer is the person who gets everybody together and give encouraging speeches to give the team the faith and the drive that they need to win the game. Hopefully these competitors are recognized as much as the MVP, because they do extraordinary things in their games vocations and in their consistent lives. The competitor who is known for doing all that they can to enhance their diversion, from remaining after training to do additional to setting off to the exercise center each prior day practice to exercise. They are to a great degree persuaded, decided and devoted to what they do. These competitors are the ones that mentors particularly need to be on their group. These players are known for being exceedingly helpful to the group's prosperity, as well as to alternate players around them. They set an incredible case for others around them and can leave an enduring imprint on individuals. They might be alluded , yet don't think that'd an awful thing since with regards to diversion time, don't be amazed on the off chance that they outflank the restricting group's "star" player.
Following there is the competitor who was not given much regular capacity. They are feeble, awkward, and cumbersome. They can get by playing a few games, however they have restricted choices as most games require fair competitors at a focused level. They are the "benchwarmer" of groups, the powerless connection in the chain. Different competitors get effectively baffled with these players when they commit errors despite the fact that it may not be altogether their blame. In spite of the fact that their athletic yield may not be as high as some might want, nobody can scrutinize their exertion and commitment. They play sports not on the grounds that they are great at them, but rather in light of the fact that they genuinely adore them, and sometimes, that can bring somebody more distant than common ability.
Also the competitor who "exhausts" and goes past what's fundamental in irrelevant circumstances. Everybody has seen no less than one of this sort of individual previously, regardless of whether they know it or not. The most widely recognized place to discover these sorts of individuals is in rec center class. They are the ones that you see going to each class and making a decent attempt as they can to win. Numerous individuals don't care for these individuals an excess of on the grounds that they strive in superfluous circumstances. Commonly, these individuals build up a poor notoriety as a "make a decent attempt" among their companions. They may not be the most capable individual there, but rather you can simply rely on observing them starting to sweat.
As well as the competitor who does all that they can to suck up to their mentor. They endeavor to get all the brownie focuses they can with expectations of getting all the more playing time. They take after all headings given by their mentor, they assist at whatever point conceivable, and they give full exertion when the mentor is looking. They are fundamentally the same as a brownnoser that you would most ordinarily find in grade school. Much like alternate understudies discover these brownnosers to irritate, a mentor's pet's partners regularly believe that these individuals are irritating and dreadful to be near.
Then some competitors are excessively forceful when playing sports. They are known to drive different players around and regularly get in a bad position with the ref. Additionally, they are a mentor's bad dream as they are difficult to control. According to The Studies in the Sociology of Sport childhood sport involvement and when significant other influences is conceived as being more than just static one way role model behavior that the use of recursive path analysis may present problems(pg.142). The competitors aren't generally great to have on a group since they give the group an awful notoriety and influence it to appear as if everybody on the group plays as they do. Additionally, they are significantly more inclined to being sidelined and as a result, disappointing whatever is left of the group. Commonly, different competitors don't care for taking an interest with individuals like this on the grounds that these forceful individuals remove the enjoyment from rivalry.
The competitor who likes to flaunt before their fans. They wear the gaudy hardware, they play out the insane tricks, and they are the arrogant identity in the locker room. To give an unmistakable photo of this sort of competitor, simply envision the player that has the best apparatus, the flashiest pullover, plays out the highlight moves, and appears to put on a show for the individual in the stans
Lastly, the competitor who discards their athletic capacities and coasts. They are languid, unmotivated, and not devoted by any stretch of the imagination. They might be outstanding amongst other competitors around yet they don't matter their capacities. Everybody knows no less than one individual who totally squanders the characteristic ability that was given to them. It's a disgrace to see these competitors squander ability when there are different competitors with extensively less ability who work twice as hard. Numerous individuals don't care for these competitors since they underestimate their capacities and don't understand that half of the fight towards being effective in a game has just been battled for them. They should simply put in simply the smallest piece of exertion and they will begin to see extensive achievement. Much of the time, these competitors are looked down on by others and convey a negative meaning with them wherever they go.
There is significantly more to a group's prosperity than simply the wins. The players included are what truly characterize a group and they at last decide how fruitful a group can be. This is the place numerous games mentors turn out badly. They want to manufacture a title bore group from a cluster of players that would preferably demonstrate they are great than their group. Remember that it takes the correct blend of these nine sorts of competitors to make the ideal group.
Work Cited
- Dunleavy, Aidan O. Studies in the Sociology of Sport: Refereed Proceedings of the 2. Annual Conference of the North American Soc. for the Sociology of Sport, Fort Worth, Texas, November 1981. Texas Christian Univ. Pr., 1982.
- Comeaux, Eddie. Making the Connection: Data-Informed Practices in Academic Support Centers for College Athletes. Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2015.
- "Athlete Classification" StudyMode.com. 03 2013. 2013. 03 2013
Cite this page
Classification Of College Athletes. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Weed Concerning to College Athletes
The question of college athletes using marijuana in college has stirred up a great controversy in today's society. The topic is controversial because in some states the drug is legal, but it is still illegal at the federal level. It also is said to give athletes some benefits and non-benefits that can affect the athlete.
The main reason why college athletes aren't allowed to use marijuana is because even though weed is legal at the state level, it is not legal at a federal level. This means if the federal government wants to hold charges against a college for allowing their athletes to use marijuana, there can be serious consequences and ramification for that college. This scare and discourages a lot of colleges, athletic programs, from promoting use of the drug, because most colleges receive a substantial amount government funding, which would be in jeopardy, if they allowed marijuana use. There can be various consequences for marijuana use, such as a college athlete losing their scholarship or the chance to play college sports period. Using marijuana, as an athlete, is something you don't want to play with if you're dream is to (one day) make it into the big league.
Some people say marijuana should be allowed for college athletes because of the benefits. Some of the many benefit that marijuana can give an athlete is muscle relaxation, which can help athletes recover from workouts quicker allowing them to work out more often. Marijuana also can help an athlete gain weight if needed. Marijuana also can be used as a pain reliever/softener if an athlete was injured. It's also said to protect the brain from concussions and trauma. Meaning it can help football players sustain hits to the head more often. The drug also can help the student athletes cope with depression and anxieties to help them become focused in their studies and sports. Marijuana also can stop muscle spasms and cramps that occur during competition and working out. It is said that marijuana can also stop headaches caused from strenuous workouts. The drug can also help with responses allowing you to do things quicker and more efficient. It also allows an athlete to get better sleep which can improve energy and recovery of the body. Marijuana is said to improve vision and concentration allowing athletes to focused in on the game. It also allows athletes to forget previous traumatic experiences related to the activity such as hits, falls and injuries. Marijuana is also said to make people happier in which athletes will begin to have fun with the sport instead of being stressed about it.
It is a fact that marijuana doesn't have to be just smoked to gain some of the same benefits. Marijuana come in many different forms liquid and edibles that will give you the same effects without the pressure of causing harm to the lungs. Meaning that you don't get the disadvantages of the smoke such as the smell and the long-term effect on the lungs. These advantage alone can give an athlete an upper hand over others when it comes to competing and getting better at their sport.
Many argue that Marijuana should not be allowed for college athletes because of the non-benefits. Many people believe that the drug doesn't give an athlete the upper-hand but it takes away from the athlete ability by taking away their time and education readiness to be eligible to play, which give them a disadvantage at the start. They say things like the drug is addictive and can cause athletes to spend most of their time getting high. It's also said the that the drug can kill brain cells and make an athlete not as smart making them unable to pass classes to be eligible to play. The National Institute on Drug Abuse states that 9 percent of all user of marijuana will become dependent, whereas 17 percent of people who start using during their teens are more likely to be dependent on it. One study conducted by the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence in 2011, said that 42 percent of users who tried to quit experienced withdrawal symptoms, such as a loss of appetite and increased levels of irritation. The THC in the weed could mess with your balance if too much is consumed at once, can cause one to stumble and fall. Marijuana can also cause psychosis, if too much is consumed, causing people to hallucinations, to be delusional, and to their sense of personal identity. If too much THC is consumed it can also cause dizziness or lightheadedness. Also, the smoke in weed can make you develop a chronic cough or a respiratory illness, due to the weed smoke. The smoke in weed can lead to a medical condition called Cannabinoid Hyperemesis that can lead to nausea and vomiting. These disadvantages can harm an athlete and cause them to their skills in their sport.
The question of college athletes using marijuana in college has stirred up a big controversy in today's times. Its controversies include both state and federal legal oppositions, as well as the many pros and cons on the effect that marijuana has on an athlete. Overall, both arguments give great examples on, whether or whether not, marijuana should be used by college athletes. However, the big question remains, should or shouldnt college athlete use marijuana? The verdict is still out!
Cite this page
Weed Concerning to College Athletes. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
What is the Value of Life?
Cite this page
What is the value of life?. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Your Time is Limited…
Your time is limited, so dont waste it living someone elser's life.(Steve Jobs). Life has a special meaning because it was given to us by God. However, individuals have a habit of forgetting to be grateful and thankful of their own. In the speech of Steve Jobs, it explains how people only got one chance at life, so they have to enjoy it now while they can. Also, individuals need to value their life more. In Steve Jobs quote, Stay hungry. Stay foolish., it has connections towards other authorr's articles. The theme is to keep moving forward at life no matter what. Amanda Ripley, Roger Ebert, and Steve Jobs all have connections to Stay hungry. Stay foolish. because they all stood hungry and achieved at life and they stood foolish by taking life changing risks.
Amanda Ripley gave the same meaning as Steve Jobs did on cherishing life. She explains how you can not trade life for anything because it is so much valuable: ...to place as much of a value on that lost loved one as they can. So here is where they seek to amplify the value on that lost loved one as they can. They seek to amplify the value of that memory. (Ripley). What this quote says is that life is too valuable for it to be lost. She states that individuals should be wanting more for than what they lost. Ripley also argues that all life is equal: She says, (...all lives are equal (Ripley). This quote is saying that equality should be in all lives of humanity.
Another connection is Roger Ebert who also was diagnosed with cancer. The advice in his article is to never give up. Cancer changed Ebertr's perspective on life and it made him to cherish his own life. Also, he did not give up from this brutal disease. Ebert is still himself: He says, Itr's saving me. When I am writing my problems become invisible and I am the same person I always was. All is well. I am the same person I was always. (Ebert). This quote is saying that Ebert is not afraid of death because he did everything and acomplished so much in life. Roger Ebert taught people when something does not go in our way in life, never give up.
Steve Jobs was a man who changed his perspective on life. Jobs had his own company, Apple. He, in fact, was the creator of Apple. However, he was later kicked and replaced out of his own company, but Jobs is did not let this stop him from getting his company back. As he was planning to get his job back, Jobs was diagnosed with cancer. He stated his cancer was the best thing that ever happened to him because it drove him to not give up and try new and better things. This later resulted in getting his job back as director of Apple: He says Remembering that Ill be dead soon is the most important tool Ive ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life (Jobs). This quote shows that Jobs kept moving forward even though he was diagnosed with cancer. Cancer was his drive to keep trying new things in which resulted in getting his job back.
A call to action is to not let anyone nor anything have a bad impact on your life. The secret for a good life is to keep on cherishing life, to not give up, and to keep moving forward. These advice are what the authors and Steve Jobs gave individuals. In conclusion, Steve Jobs quote, Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish. has connections with Roger Ebert, Amanda Ripley, and not other than Steve Jobs himself.
Works Cited
- Jobs, Steve. "You've Got to Find What You Love." Stanford Report, 14 June 2005
- Jones, Chris. ""Roger Ebert: The Essential Man"." Esquire, 16 Feb. 2010.
- Ripley, Amanda. "What is a Life Worth." Time, 11 Feb. 2002.
Cite this page
Your time is limited.... (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Censorship and the Dark Knight
Comics are some of the more unique things to have developed out of the Great Depression and are a form of entertainment that persists even into the digital and technological world of the 21st century. When first conceived, they were simple, fun, and presented a new way of conveying a story using color that popped off the page and unique or zany characters. Batman, or the Bat-man, was one such hero comic. From the time Detective Comic #27 hit newsstands in 1939, Batman was a dark new hero who fought crime alongside his partner Robin. But Batman had to undergo serious changes years later. His image altered, his plots dampened and his opponents simplified to something childish. So why did a popular super hero who enjoyed widespread popularity and great plots become so reviled and diluted into something queer only fifteen years later? The time period of the late 1930s and 1940s illustrated a time of development and experimentation for comics, particularly the Batman comic universe, under the auspices of only the creator and the publisherr's overview. However, the 1950s brought Batman and many other comics to be scrutinized by the psychologists and regulated by the US government out of fears of communism and socialism.
Creating the Bat-Man
In 1939, the birth of Batman came about from the need for a new hero in the nascent and rapidly expanding comic market, a hero that needed to be unique but also reflective of the decades advancements in science and technology. The Depression-era comic company National Comics, the forerunner to todayr's DC comics, wanted to capitalize upon the success that the Superman comics had. But they needed a new novel idea. Editor Vin Sullivan looked for a new team to put together a comic. They found a cartoonist who ran strips on rag papers in New York City named Robert ?Bob Kane and a writer Bill Finger to create a new hero. The agency wanted to veer away from the usual super-power heroes that were typical of early comics and instead wanted something a little more visceral. Mr. Kane worked as a freelancer for years, working on the odd comic book. Mr. Finger, a former schoolmate of Kaner's from the Bronx, dabbled with comics and sold shoes before he ghostwrote for Kane in comics published for newspapers and other publications in the early 1930s. But it was Mr. Kane who came up with the idea of the Bat-Man character, and it is certainly not the caped crusader that we know him as today. His outfit was quite different. Kane said that his ideas for Bat-Man were inspired by the Da Vinci blueprint for a device that requires wings to fly. Mr. Finger later recalled:
Finger gave his input of edits to the cowl and a cape over wings. Kane also recalled the meeting in his autobiography, Batman and Me:
This rendering is a Batman many in America are more familiar with. Kane and Finger used the 1930r's contemporary trends and outlooks on technology to form the mind of the Bat-Man”race, personality, thinking. They also used the scientific advances of the day to influence the heror's weaponry and methodology. The 1930s were a time where technology was bettering the lives of millions of people from radios to gas stoves. Kane and Finger concluded that Bat-Man should be someone on the cutting edge of the technological curve. In the 1930r's, technology had advanced so much that peopler's well-beings was improved close to the standard that we have in the modern era. In the view of many inventors, technologyr's purpose was to serve humans in capacity that would make life easier and safer. Batman would be no different.
The identity of the Bat-Man is one rooted in the history of Anglo-American rule breakers and shows the uniquely American identity of the hero. When tasked with the development of the secret identity of the Bat-Man, Bill Finger wanted to use Anglo-American heritage. The name of Bruce Wayne was a combination between two people from Anglo-American history: King of Scots Robert Bruce and Brigadier General Mad Anthony Wayne. Robert Bruce, a king, Scottish nationalist, and patriot from the early fourteenth century. Bruce was the leader of the rebellion against England during the First War of Scottish Independence. The ?Wayne portion of the name originated from the Brigadier General Anthony Wayne. His rather odd reputation for his seemingly cockamamie and, by all intents and purposes, bullish war tactics, such as those displayed at the Battle of Fallen Timbers during the Northwest Indian War. This heritage gave Batman a sort of birthright as an American hero.
The predecessors of comics were a largely unregulated series of publications called ?pulps. Of these heroic stories, Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, and Justice League comics, contained many of the characteristics of the pulp fiction. The term derived from the wood pulp that the paper sheafs these stories were printed on. They were the predecessors to the short fiction and penny press novels that arose out of the democratization of American and British media, such as newspapers and periodicals in the late 19th century. They reached their zenith during the interwar period and featured a diverse melange of stories from those about the lost city of Atlantis to the bloody cases of detectives and from fantastic sci-fi battles to sultry romantic exploits. Many of the stereotypes about certain things ”like aliens and sea monsters” arose from such novels. Literature of this type, as the US Senate Subcommittee on Comics illustrated in their findings on comics published in the 1950s, lacked any real editing on presentation or tastefulness. The pulps also provided no guidelines for publication and that resulted in many being extremely violent and raunchy, even by todayr's standards. Batman also had some very unsavory elements in the early years.
Batman Ascending
In the Golden age of Bat-Man that spanned from 1939 throughout the 1940s, pulp styles were heavy-handed in the comics and Batmanr's character became progressively more pronounced with little attention paid to by DC or its editors. By 1940, Batman had his own comic and now was consider a keystone element to the DC companyr's success. The first few issuances of the Batman comics, Kane noted he gave Batman more striking features such as a heroic face (cheekbones, jawline, etc.) than the Batman in the rudimentary sketches hashed out. Kane affectionally called him, my mature Batman. In the run up to the 1940r's, Batman had all the hallmark ?Bat gadgets. First was the utility belt that became pivotal in Batmanr's crime fighting capability. A few months later came Batmanr's boomerang inspired ?Batarang that is now ubiquitous in all Batman media and is in toy stores across America. In the same rollout as the Batarang, Batman was seen in his flying vehicle” the Batplane. Then in a subsequent comic, the Batmobile rolled onto the scene originally in a bright red and then black and blue. While there is not any major research done on trends in comic hero development through the lease of the times, one can infer that this new toolkit is reflective of the advancement of weaponry that came out of the Second World War and the violence that was present in that conflict. Nevertheless, the technologically reliant hero was an instant hit. Many people were fond of this hero who used items from modern day discourse (i.e. planes and steel weapons). DC was amazed at the astounding sales that they allowed the Batman team look over the stories themselves and bypass company editing.
The late 1940s brought a softened touch for the Batman and a slow phase out of the pulp impacted elements due to rising concern over the Red Scarer's impact on society. The beginning of this new era of Batman began in April of 1940, with the introduction of Robin who in turn became an absolute staple in the Batman story for the next seven decades. Bill Finger wanted a complementary figure to Batman a sort of figure that would temper the hero and provide a sort of devilr's advocate and friend while still participating in the crime fighting element of the story. A former circus performer that went by the name Dick Grayson, Bruce Wayne adopted him and brought him into his vigilante project. The new independent Batman comics brought a 17-year-old assistant named Jerry Robinson on the project. A comic cartoonist prodigy, Robinson brought new details to the series that impact the modern Batman tales. The plot lines featured two new unique villains that were static throughout the 40s” the infamous Joker, a psychotic clown, and Catwoman, a cat-burglar. Jokerr's depiction was a grotesque clown who poisoned his victims with Joker toxin (originally called Joker venom) and the very first super-villains Batman encounters. This Joker villain played into peopler's fears of psychopaths creating disharmony in the American way of life. Catwoman was a villain who inflected with the changing position of women starting in the 1950s.
In the first few editions of Batman comics and, particularly in his first appearance in Detective Comics, Batman was not the image we would congenitally see him as. One markedly shocking theme came in scenes of him murdering and crippling criminals in a style that many would see as uncharacteristically violent. The first independent Batman comic involved the Caped Crusader killing monsters with a gun in a particularly vicious fashion. This was bridge too far. Editors and executives who wanted a softened Batman and DC stepped in after close to ten years of the series and wanted the gun eliminated from his arsenal for fear of exactly what would happen in the 1950s” censorship.
Censoring Batman
The supposed Silver and Bronze ages of Batman in the 1950s brought with them controversy and a new direction in a heavily scrutinized comic industry that was created by the publication of Seduction of the Innocent and the beginnings of the McCarthy hearings. The 1950s were the years that gave way to hearings in the US House of Representatives, and to lesser degree the Senate, on certain things considered un-American. Among them were the infamous McCarthy hearings that resulted in the smearing of literary and Hollywood figures like Arthur Miller and Charlie Chaplin. Comics, too, came into the searing lenses of ultra-Americanism. In 1954, a book written by a psychiatrist by the name of Dr. Fredric Wertham was published called Seduction of the Innocent. It accused comics of having a deleterious affect on the developing psyches of young children, inspiring juvenile delinquency and later drugs, alcohol, and violent crime. How did Nietzsche get into the nursery Here is the repetition of violence and sexiness, he writes, which no Freud, Krafft-Ebing, of Havelocke Ellis would ever dreamed be offered to children and in such profusion! He purported that the relationship between Batman and Robin was homosexual. When he testified in the Senate before the judiciary committee, when asked about Batman and Robinr's supposed romantic relationship, Wertham stated, Well, it certainly seems that way, wouldnt you think? He said parents werent supervising their kids enough because parents think comics are just about cowboys and silly newspaper gags.
This book became a popular bestseller and encouraged outraged parents to call for censorship in an effort to preserve the countryr's moral compass. In a 1954 piece in the Providence Journal, staff writer Ben Bagdikian writes about how Wertham views comics as the following: [They are] psychotic[ally] violent, semi-pornography [that] constitute a serious if not underground consumption. Bagdikian continues to say that Werthamr's behaviorist roots are influencing his thinking. He cites that Wertham belief that comics foster sexual abnormality and confusion in addition to racist ideas and sadism. Its not just boys, girls turn towards promiscuity and sexual teasing. Bagdikian points out that in the United States there are ninety million comic books published a month. One third of them are crime comics (which Batman was characterized as) and westerns (which he notes Wertham counts as a crime book). Bagdikian reports that, according to Wertham, the comic book companies print the crime ?pamphlets for any where between a half or three-quarters cents on the dollar and sell them at a 20 percent mark-up of ten cents on the dollar. They make $1,000,000 per week from children. Some publishers get 40% return on investment. He says paper pulp companies worry about if they can continue to print, and even alleges that the comics own the companies in a monopolistic presentation of the industry. Now, whether or not these numbers or facts were fabricated or not remains a mystery as newspapers at the time watched their tone for fear of being labeled as a communist scandal sheet. Additionally, no documents exist to corroborate these claims of ripping off the poor urchins of America and Mr. Bagdikian could simply be using embellishment.
About a month after the book hit stores, a contributing writer for the New York Times by the name of C. Wright Mills gave a fascinating insight into how ?grateful parents should be for Werthamr's book. Mills was a professor of sociology at Columbia University and a self-proclaimed scholar of the human mind and its nuances. This piece alleges that parents have zero oversight over what their child reads. ?These ugly pamphlets, as Mills puts it, contribute to the rebelliousness of youth and foster a sense of childhood backwardness. They are a detriment to good reading and a force of illiteracy, Mills accuses. Plainly said, Mills essentially stumps here for Wertham, his research saying it should be further studied and dissected in depth. In New York state, six legislative measures were put forward to attempt to curb comics including Batman citing unrealistic depictions of law enforcement. In a New York Times article from the same year as Werthamr's book, writer Warren Weaver, Jr. of The New York Times reports from Albany that the Joint Legislative Committee on Comic Books recommended six initiatives for the curtailment of ?lewd books. The report that published in 1954 baselessly alleged that comics, threaten[ing] the spiritual, mental, and physical welfare of the state. The recommended legislative initiatives included fining vendors $150 who sell comics to minors. They also recommended a certain age where an individual can purchase comics. It is a testament of the American court of public opinion and how easily it can be swayed” even when presented with flimsy evidence and weak arguments.
Many of the assertions made by Dr. Wertham and the Senate Judiciary Committee were false in many of the cases involving Batman. For one, the purported notions of a homosexual relationship between Batman and Robin are specious and unfounded as evidenced through simple deduction and closer examination and reading of the comics. All of the comics where Robin or Dick Grayson appeared with Batman or Bruce Wayne and spoke to each other were certainly heartfelt, but none were of the salacious manner that Dr. Wertham argues. This form of censorship made many hero comics, not just Batman, decline in plot quality. One issue had Batman and Robin fighting off a space invasion (perhaps a sign of the times) and in another Batman was turned into a ?Zebra Batman. This radioactive Mr. Hyde figure gallivanted around Gotham as a villain and was widely unpopular appearing only once. Batman and Robin traveling to the moon and getting frozen in ice for 200 years were just some of the bizarre array of plots that came out of this era. The comic companies tried to use vibrant colors and illustrations to reclaim some of the enthusiasm it found pre-Wertham but it was futile. The lackluster plots resulted in a dip in sales but the comics however retained their general popularity.
At a time when Dr. Walter Freeman was performing ice-pick lobotomies as a form of psychotherapy, it seems to us in the modern day ridiculous and a form of pseudoscience. In a New York Times piece published in 2013 by Dave Itzkoff, research presented by Dr. Carol L. Tilley of the University of Illinoisr's Graduate School of Library and Information Science says that Wertham manipulated the results of his findings to skew the data towards his personal convictions. She also supposes that the fears many Americans held at the height of the second Red Scare and a serious wave of social conservatism in the suburbs forced this book into the spotlight. She also notes the number of children used as a population was heavily inflated and the results were from the poverty stricken area of New York City in Harlem. Additionally, Wertham excluded extenuating circumstances and the possibility of any mental illness in the focus group. Itzkoff also puts in his own thoughts: Werthamr's influence was indisputable. Comic magazines that focused on horror, crime or shock and suspense stories were shut down by the dozens.
In spite of this new evidence, Batman still required a serious overhaul. The curtailment of violence was because of these McCarthyite impositions on the comic industry. One may surmise that Jokerr's jovial pranks and more tame story lines existed only as attempts to subvert otherwise draconian rules imposed by the federally mandated Comic Code Authority created as a quasi-public oversight on comic and other graphic publications. Even before being subject to the codes, Joker witnessed a scaled back to try and appeal to a younger audience. They attempted to present him as more of a fanciful and funny prankster. However by the late 50s, Joker saw even further scale backs and in some cases was replaced by other villains in order to comply with codes. Many of the nudity provisions in the guidelines forced Catwoman and Batmanr's early love interest, Vicki Vale, off the pages. If Catwoman appeared, it was in a tamer form and lacked a sultry nature and Vickir's relationship to Bruce was much more flat with less passion and romance and more of a platonic courtship. Moreover, to receive the stamp of approval by the CCA, Batman plots in the 50r's evolved into something more diluted. Many provisions in the code that had to be followed included but were not limited to: crime being depicted as an unpleasant activity, good triumphing over evil, and tasteful depictions of females.
Batman Forever
The story of Batman is one that persists today and comics are still being released every month. With the CCA and the McCarthy era behind us, Batman has taken on a more realistic nature. With the ascendency of the Nixon presidency, the CCA and other family-values lobby groups attempting to censor pop culture fell out of favor. The US government was more concerned with ending the Vietnam War, attempting to revive a flailing economy, and trying to open up many of the closed societies that existed such as in China and Africa. Many comics entered a renaissance period with the rollback of many of the McCarthy era regulations and a resurgence of new Batman comics. The interactions that Americans have with comics today is with movies such as DC's Dark Knight series and Marvelr's The Avengers series, both of which address issues of the modern era such as terrorism, roles of government, and the ultimate triumph of hopefulness and the greater good over chaos and evil. Comics give people a way of exploring the greater conversations of human philosophy. To stymy that conversation through censorship is to stymy the human ability to soar onward just as the late comic icon and founder of Marvel Stan Lee said, Excelsior!” ever onward.
Cite this page
Censorship and the Dark Knight. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Music Censorship in Iran
Cite this page
Music censorship in Iran. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Impact of Slavery According to Frederick Douglass
Frederick Douglass
Throughout this passage coming from the Narrative of Douglas, Douglass is referring to the women at his new plantation, or his new “home”. He portrays the idea that slavery truly does have a very impactful and large effect on everyone who witnesses it or is involved with it, rather than just the slaves themselves, specifically through the words, “soon commenced its infernal work” (Douglass 77-78). Essentially, one could say that slavery changes who a person is entirely, and this is demonstrated perfectly through Douglass’ words throughout this passage.
Douglass shows the true impact slavery leaves on everyone through the picture he paints into your head, which stems from his use of imagery when he states, “cheerful eye” and “red with rage” (Douglass 77-78). The use of the imagery impacts readers, and brings to life the idea that slavery was life changing as it shows that her once happy self was changed the minute her life was introduced to slavery through her new marriage, as prior to this she had never experienced the horror of slavery. She was once pure and innocent, yet that was all taken away from her when she entered the world of slavery. The torture her and her husband were inflicting on others took a toll on her personality as a whole, and eventually sucked all of the life out of her.
Following this, Douglass’ use of a metaphor through the words, “angelic face gave place to that of a demon” (Douglass 77-78) shows yet again the idea that people change entirely through the terrifying, and horrific process that slavery was, and all of the treatment that it entailed. This metaphor compares not only the women to an angel in the past, but now a demon as well, which are two very opposite, and rather heavy things to be compared to mentally. Yet again, the idea that slavery can make someone who was once so pure, or someone who obtained an “angelic face” into the worst thing possible, “a demon” is brought to life through this extremely impactful metaphor, as the terms used are on a very deep scale for many. Finally, Douglass brings up once again how amazing and wonderful this woman was prior to this horrid experience and conditions she had to witness others go through. Through the words, “a woman of the kindest heart and finest feelings” (Douglass 77-78), the theme above occurs once again, yet this time, with diction. This woman truly was one of the best people that others had known, up until her breaking point throughout her experience.
Through these words however, it shows the purity, innocence, and true kindness that she had in her heart and in her soul, as Douglass could have simply stated that “she was kind”, yet he took it to a much greater extent to show the true meaning behind her as a person. By using rhetorical strategies which form such a impactful, influential, and real effect on the readers, Douglass continuously shows the life lasting, and changing effects slavery had on everyone involved in the process, rather than just the slaves.
Also, it shows that it doesn’t just change someone’s life and their views, yet it changes who they are as a person overall. Thus, making it extremely hard for readers to imagine how cruel times were in the past, which pulls on their heart and makes them much more grateful for the life they are given now. It can evoke an emotional response, as many don’t truly understand just how impactful and horrific this time was, yet due to the aid from rhetorical strategies, Douglass helps readers better understand this.
Cite this page
Impact Of Slavery According To Frederick Douglass. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
The Reality of Slavery in Douglass’s Work
Cite this page
The Reality Of Slavery In Douglass's Work. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Main Motives in Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
Cite this page
Main Motives In Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Lives of Slaves Frederick Douglass’s Book
Cite this page
Lives Of Slaves Frederick Douglass's Book. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
The most Important Black Leader of 19th Century
Frederick Douglass
Frederick Douglass suffered approximately twenty years in the bondage of slavery. Douglass never received formal education but was determined to teach himself to read and write. He first got ideas about freedom from The Columbian Orator. He overcame adversity and was extremely brave. Frederick Douglass transitioned from being a slave to being an advocate for abolition and other civil rights movements such as the womenr's rights movement.
Frederick Douglass never knew his father and was taken away from his mother shortly after birth. Frederick was most likely the result of his master or overseer raping his mother. Even his birth was caused by an act of cruelty.
Douglass witnessed many injustices throughout his life that disturbed him and made him want to seek change. As a child he befriended poor white children and traded bread in an attempt to gain knowledge. He shined shoes so that he could earn money to buy The Columbian Orator. Douglass had many masters, some were fair and some were cruel but slavery was never a fortunate situation to be in. Frederick was almost like someone from the outside looking in on the horror of slavery, I did not, when a slave, understand the deep meaning of those rude and apparently incoherent songs (Douglass, Frederick 50). Douglass never knew what the salve songs really meant and represented. Although he was a slave, Douglass was always different. Douglass refused to accept his unfortunate situation and took action to change his life.
Douglass got many ideas about abolition from The Columbian Orator and always knew that he was not meant to remain a slave for his entire life. The Columbian Orator contained themes of nationalism, religion, and individual liberty. These ideas led him to believe that the book had an anti-slavery tone. A couple of Irish sailors once encouraged Douglass to run away and that further filled his head with ideas of freedom. He loses his spirit when he is sent to work for Edward Covey and considers suicide. A fight with Covey rekindles his fighting spirit. Secretly, he starts teaching the other slaves to read and write. A plan was formed with other slaves to escape but they were caught before action was ever taken to run away. Douglass is sent to Baltimore to live with Hugh Auld. He becomes a apprentice for ship building and ship caulking. During that time he is attacked by four white men. After he recovers, Douglass works at Auldr's shipyard. He is able to make money but is forced to give his wages to Auld. Douglass seeks work on his own and takes on the responsibilities of a free man. He believed that his story was his most important possession.
On September 3, 1838, Frederick Douglass escaped Slavery in Baltimore Maryland. The details of his escape were not revealed at the time because he did not want slave owners to know how to prevent their slaves from escaping as well. It was known that he ran away to New York City. The city is overwhelming to Douglass. He is taken in by a free black. On September 15 he married Anna Murray. It is at this time that he chooses to change his name from Bailey to Douglass. They then moved to New Bedford Massachusetts. He spoke about his experiences during his time as a slave and became an orator for abolition. During his tours where he visited England, Ireland, and Scotland abolitionists offered to pay for his freedom. He returned to America as a free man. He wrote the book Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass to prove his enslavement and record his experiences. He also supported womenr's rights and helped with the underground railroad. Douglass was an abolitionist, reformer, editor, orator, and author. For Douglass, literacy was power. He wanted to prove that blacks were not naturally inferior but that they were made inferior by white people.
Frederick Douglass was the most important black leader of the nineteenth century. He displayed amazing bravery and independence. He refused to accept his condition and looked for ways to lessen the burden of slavery and better himself. Douglass had ideas of freedom from an early age and they fuled him to keep fighting. Once he was free, he spent his time trying to help those who were still being oppressed. Frederick Douglass was a voice for the voiceless and a glimmer of hope from people still fighting for their rights.
Works Cited
- Douglass, Frederick, and Ira Dworkin. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American
Slave. Penguin Classics, 2014. - Frederick Douglass. National Parks Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, 2 Feb. 2018,
www.nps.gov/frdo/learn/historyculture/frederickdouglass.htm.
Cite this page
The Most Important Black Leader Of 19th Century. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Analysis of the Story of an Hour
Cite this page
Analysis of The Story of An hour. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Should Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?
Physician-assisted suicide is a area of much controversy and discussion. Whether you are for or against this procedure, you have heard of it in one form or another. In my paper I would like to bring to life many aspects of this growing practice. In my paper I will discuss religion, laws, personal choices, as well as one major question: Sanctity of life vs Quality of life.
Religion is an area that is in most decisions you make, so why is end of life any different. TO dive in to this area, you must understand all sides involved. The patient, the patientr's family, and more often forgotten the physician who is assisting. In an excerpt from an article I read it states Fully to appreciate the implications of assimilating assisted death into medical practice, one must recognize the spiritual significance of killing on the physicians who euthanize patients or who aid and abet patients in killing themselves. (Physician-Assisted suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: How not to Die as a Christian.) One must really understand the dilemma that the physician has when agreeing to help one end their life. They are bound by an oath to help, but at the same time the same oath states to do no harm. This is an area that is very hard for many physicians to have. They must also except the implications of helping someone end their life, to deal with the burden of guilt, as well as the guilt sometimes brought on by the family left behind.
Physician are not the most important to think of the religious consequences of euthanasia, but the patient more so. They are the ones who must make the ultimate decision to end their life. But who says that to end their life should be against oner's religion? There are many reasons and decisions to think of. Religion also states that one should not have to suffer, and we should do anything to help our loved ones find peace.
Another area that is very important in the area of physician assisted suicide is the legality of it all. Only few states are even legal to have euthanasia as an option at the end of life. One article state We argue that moving from opposition to neutrality is not ethically neutral, but a substantive shift from prohibited to optional. (Physician-Assisted Suicide: Why Neutrality by Organized Medicine Is Neither Neutral Nor Appropriate.) this is its self asks the question of being legal and ethical. Rather more so is it morally right vs legally right. The debate amongst the medical community is split. Many are for euthanasia while there are still some against or on the fence as far as their feelings on the subject. In 2014, Brittany Maynard a you woman with brain cancer moved to Oregon so she could end her suffering. Oregon is one of few states with the death with dignity laws. In this article she puts her life to the point stating I dont want to die, but I am dying. She also states My [cancer] is going to kill me, and itr's a terrible, terrible way to die, so to be able to die with my family with me, to have control of my own mind . . . to go with dignity is less terrifying. When I look into both options I have to die, I feel this is far more humane. (I Dont Want to Die, But Im Dying: Reexamining Physician Assisted Suicide in a New Age of Substantive Due Process.) She chose when and how she would die, in the end she died a peaceful death with her family around her. Why should this not be the case for anyone dying from a terminal illness who has fought through every option. Why would you not let someone chose when they die, and not have to put themselves and family through all the suffering. Many states and other countries are looking at this matter to decide if it should be legal. Everyone should have the right to die with dignity.
There are other issues with the legality of death with dignity. Such as being able to stop all life saving measures, however you must suffer until you die. Many states you may stop all artificial life, however, you cannot choose to end your life. Another article state If you were on life-sustaining treatment, you would have a right to withdraw the treatment and then we could let you die. But since you are not, we can only allow you to refuse nutrition and hydration or give you palliative care until you die a natural death, however painful, undignified, and costly. (An Ethical Analysis of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Rejecting Euthanasia and Accepting Physician-Assisted Suicide with Palliative care.) This means you will have to suffer instead of being able to end that all before it happens. In a study done 216 men and women over the age of 60 were asked if they would want to die with dignity, while most did not, some agreed after being afraid of death and dying. Older people would like their wishes heard as anyone else. (Religiosity and the Wish of Older Adults for Physician-Assisted Suicide.)
Society is a major factor in this debate over physician assisted suicide, there are many sides to be taken. I believe that unless one has seen first hand what some terminal illnesses can do, you do not fully understand how detrimental this choice is. As an oncology nurse I see firsthand the suffering that many patients go through. The families that are turn between whatr's right and what is best for the patient. I do not belie there is a wrong or right, rather it should be a personal choice. The death and dignity laws should be made legal for all states, so patients do not have to move just to end their suffering. Or be confined by the laws of our system. It should become a fundamental right just as abortion. Society does not want to think of suicide as okay, however in the context of this it should be discussed more. More people with terminal illnesses should be able to have these discussions without feeling like society is coming down on them. And society should help aid these patients in their feelings. Not cast them away for not wanting to suffer. Society having a negative outlook on this subject has been going on for centuries. In a book written by Ian Dowbiggin, he takes it back to the days of Darwin, and that euthanasia is another way of cutting down the population, then helping people. He then in the era of the great depression started a group called Euthanasia Society of America, where his books are a fundamental part of history. (A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America.)
In another aspect we must look at those with not only terminal illnesses but also Disability as well. Within the right to die movement is an attitude that physician assisted death and disability are two separate issues. State statutes legalizing physician assisted death carefully restrict access to the terminally ill, competent adult who chooses whether or not to self-administer a lethal dose of prescribed drugs. (Death with Dignity: The Wedge That Divides the Disability Rights Movement from the Right to die Movement.) This means those with disability are arguing that these are two separate areas, as the laws are making them stand as one area. The Euthanasia Society of America states that Initially, the Euthanasia Society of America, founded in 1939, advocated that it was humane to hasten the death of suffering patients. They also state that those born with defects should be able to end their suffering without having to live their whole lives defective.
The biggest is debate is that of Sanctity of Life and knowing what is thought to be right as far as religion and society think is right versus the Quality of Life and oner's right to chose to end their suffering. Why should someone have to suffer, when an ending could be so painless and end so quickly. One with an incurable disease, terminal illness, debilitating disability should not have to suffer because society or religion says they must. A personr's right to choose should trump all. If made a fundamental right this would be a choice free to make such as abortion and other decisions, we must make in the US. There is much debate over whether it is morally wrong to have physician suicide, however not everyone is looking at all sides. Those who are religious are only looking at what the bible tells us is wrong to do self-harm, those in the law areas are looking at physician killings, and if it is legal, and society looks at the physicians as breaking the Hippocratic oath of do no harm. But are we really harming the patient more by all these dilemmas.
Left us delve into the physician side a little more. A physician must look at all sides of the decision for helping one in suicide. They must first realize it is not only morally but ethically to be though of. Along with the biggest influence spirituality and the question on breaking a commandment. The physician must not only look at the patient and their wishes but the patientr's family, the laws of that state, the spirituality of the situation, as well as the own physicianr's beliefs on it as well. A physician must look at all sides before making a decision. They are after all the ones who must live with the decision after it has been made. Will they feel guilt, will the family blame them for the death of their loved one? Will there be legal consequences after the fact? And most important their beliefs afterwards, and how they could change.
Some arguments to counter with in this research would be to consider this medical homicide, a murder if you will. Also considering the anguish the family will be put through, nit feeling as though they had any say in the end of life of their loved one. Other arguments could include: religious points of view, how many see it as a sin to commit suicide in any condition. That people who choose to have a physician assisted suicide will go to Hell for doing this. Also, finding somewhere that the laws allow, some may not want this to be allowed in their states as they do not want the blood on their hands. There are many arguments and counter arguments to be made in this setting for physician assisted suicide.
There are also plenty of refutations as well. That legalizing a doctor to prescribe death is like a wild fire, it cannot be controlled. If we improve our practices of palliative care and hospice there is no reason to have PAS. That the act of PAS is not completely autonomous, it takes the physician to agree as well. That this will be considered mercy killings and there will be fore people using this as a advantage to take a life. The counter to this would be there is no slippery slope, for example Hitler was stopped before trying to get rid of the outcast people to form his master race. Therefore, it could never be a reason not to allow PAS. Many see it as a violation of the Hippocratic oath taken by the doctors who are prescribing death. Many see there are many alternatives to PAS such as a patientr's choice to refuse any treatment or any life sustaining treatments as well. The counter to this is that not all patients rely on these treatments and still suffer immensely.
There are not nearly enough people in the US today that even know what PAS is and that it is something that Americans are trying to choose as an alternative to dying a slow miserable death. I believe more people should be able to have more research, and more people should be reached about this real issue we have. There are 7 countries where you may go to choose to end your own life on your own terms. You must meet criteria; however it is your choice to choose how and when you die. Here in the US there are only a few states that allow this such as Oregon. I do not feel enough government official really understand what this is and how it could help millions of patients suffer from incurable, miserable diseases who must suffer out there last days.
I feel the biggest argument I have to battle with my feelings on this issue is the patientr's quality of life. Of you do not have quality of life, then what do you have left to live for? I for one do not think suffering in agony is how I would choose to live out my last few weeks or days.
In conclusion, I feel this is an issue that will soon be brought to light more and debated much before everyone decides on what will be allowed in the US. But for now I hop people will give this a real chance, and the patientr's fighting for it are heard.
Works Cited
Behuniak, Susan M. Death with Dignity: The Wedge That Divides the Disability Rights Movement from the Right to Die Movement. Politics the Life Sciences vol. 30, no. 1, Spring 2011, pp. 17-32. ESCOBhost, doi: 10.2990/30117.
Britannica Academic, Encyclopedia Britannica 14 Mar 2016. Academic-eb-com.db22. Linccweb.org/levels/collegiate/article/euthanasia/33299. Access 6 Nov. 2018 Cherry, Mark J. Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: How to Die as a Christian. Christian Bioethics: mom-Ecomenical Studies in Medical Mortality, vol. 24 No. 1, Apr. 2018, pp. 1-16. EBSCOhost, doi: 10.1093/cb/cbx021
Dowbiggin, Ian Robert, A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America. Oxford[England]: Oxford University Press 2003
Lapierre, Sylvie, et al. Religiosity and the Wish of Older Adults for Physician-Assisted Suicide. Religious, vol. 9, Mar. 2018, p.1-N.PAG.EBSCOhost, doi: 10.3390/rel 9030066.
Legault, Melissa. I Dont Want to Die, but Im Dying: Reexamining Physician-Assisted Suicide in a New Age of Substantive Due Process. Arizona Law Review, vol. 60, no. 2, June 2018, pp. 509-537. EBSCOThost, db22. Linccweb.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost. Com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=129171210&site=ehost-live.
Shibata, Benjamin. An Ethical Analysis of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Rejecting Euthanasia and Accepting Physician-Assisted Suicide with Palliative Care. Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 37, no ??, Jan. 2017, pp. 155-166. EBSCOhost, doi: 10. 1080/01947648
Sulmasy, Daniel P., et al. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Neutrality by Organized Medicine Is Neither Neutral Nor Appropriate. JGIM:Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 33, No. 8,Aug. 2018, pp. 1394-1399. EBSCOThost, doi: 10.1007/511606-018-4424-8.
Cite this page
Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal?. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Physician Assisted Suicide-Biomedical Ethics Paper
There is an increase in calls to legalize physicians in where assisted suicide has increased a public interest despite any ethical prohibitions. Many people have concerns about how they will die and the emphasis by medicine and society on the intervention and cure has sometimes come at the expense of good end-of-life care (Snyder Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017). Individuals have advocated strongly within the basis of autonomy that physician assisted suicide should be legal when it comes to choices at the end of life.
Physician assisted suicide is legal in seven out of the fifty states and the District of Columbia. When one thinks of physician assisted suicide they think of an option that is given to individuals by law within the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Oregon, Vermont and Washington. However, within the state of Montana it is only given as an option via court decision. In Montana once has to also have a terminal illness as well as a prognosis of less than six months to live for it to be considered. Within regards to physician assisted suicide (PAS), physicians cannot be prosecuted for prescribing medications to hasten one’s death.
How one dies, lives & are cared for at the end of life is important, with implications for individuals, their families, and society (Snyder Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017). There is an emphasis by medicine as well as society within the intervention as well and cure that sometimes has to come at the expense of what is considered good end of life care. When on is receiving or has received inappropriate treatment at the end of life care, it can not only be draining but it can also be harmful & that is not only for the patient but for their family as well. Everyone is going to have a concern about death at one point or time in their life. When it comes to end of life care, some patients have received unwanted care & then there are some patients who did not receive the care that was needed.
Within society still to this day medicine is a constant struggle for getting it right for every single patient. Now progress has been made & continues to be made, but has the practices & principles been fully realized? Are the physicians and nurses delivering quality end of life care to this ever diverse & growing population of the elderly? Now this would also be in regards to access to care, any communication barriers, pressure on time constraints as well as care coordination.
Going back to the states that this is legalized in, there are specific rules and methods for each state that is involved. Mainly within this process of end of life care, it involves a prescription from a licensed physician that is approved by the particular state that the patient is a resident of. For instance, in the state of Colorado, the law “allows an eligible terminally ill individual with a prognosis of six months or less to live to request and self-administer medical aid-in-dying medication in order to voluntary end his or her life; Authorizes a physician to prescribe medical aid-in-dying medication to a terminally ill individual under certain conditions; and Creates criminal penalties for tampering with a person’s request for medical aid-in-dying medication or knowingly coercing a person with a terminal illness to request the medication.” (Library, 2018).
Ethical arguments in support of physician-assisted suicide highlight the principle of respect for patient autonomy and a broad interpretation of a physician's duty to relieve suffering. Proponents view physician-assisted suicide as an act of compassion that respects patient choice and fulfills an obligation of non-abandonment. Opponents maintain that the profession's most consistent ethical traditions emphasize care and comfort, that physicians should not participate in intentionally ending a person's life, and that physician-assisted suicide requires physicians to breach specific prohibitions as well as the general duties of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Such breaches are viewed as inconsistent with the physician's role as healer and comforter (Snyder Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017).
There is a process of reporting the applications for end of life care & of course it varies by state. However, only those states where physician- assisted suicide is mandated that there is a process. In the state of Colorado, the state Department of Public Health and Environment reported that in 2017, 69 prescriptions for aid-in-dying medication were written by physicians for patients, and in 50 of those, the medication was dispended by a pharmacy (Library, 2018).
References
Library, C. (2018, August 13). Physician-Assisted Suicide Fast Facts. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/26/us/physician-assisted-suicide-fast-facts/index.html
Snyder Sulmasy, L., & Mueller, P. S. (2017, October 17). Ethics and the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide | Annals of Internal Medicine | American College of Physicians. Retrieved from https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2654458/ethics-legalization-physician-assisted-suicide-american-college-physicians-position-paper
Cite this page
Physician Assisted Suicide-Biomedical Ethics Paper. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Legalizing Assisted Suicide
If someone wanted to end their life should they be allowed to do so with the aid of a doctor? Would those with depression be allowed to end their life? If a person is in so much pain that nothing will relieve it, should they be given the means to end it? In Oregon, which had the Death with Dignity Act since 1997, people with terminal illnesses can get lethal prescriptions from their doctors to take their own lives. In the first seventeen years, five out of six people were denied the prescription. The one out of six that did get the pills; 752 people ended their lives and the other 400 people never took the pills. These numbers dont answer the questions, nor do they explain the situation these people found themselves in. Assisted suicide is a complex question discussed by many different people of all kinds of beliefs; not only a moral issue but also a logical and practical issue.
Peter Singer and Andrew Solomon are two of the more outspoken people that are in support of legalizing assisted suicide. Peter Singer is a professor of bioethics at Princeton University and the author of the books The Most Good You Can Do, Animal Liberation, The Life You Can Save, and Practical Ethics. Andrew Solomon is a professor of clinical psychology at Columbia University and the author of the books Far from the Tree: Parents, Children, and the Search for Identity, Far and Away: Reporting from the Blink of Change, and The Noonday Demon. Peter argues that the perception of death is not always negative and instead could be positive depending on the circumstances. There are circumstances in which the person who is considering death wants to die. That is their autonomous choice. So, death is not a violation of their autonomy, or contrary to their strongest wishes. Peter also argues There are cases in which a person has no more valuable life to look forward to, valuable by their judgment, not valuable by somebody else's judgment imposing on them the idea that their life is still worthwhile.
Andrew argues giving someone the choice of death would allow them to take control back of their life; Because much of modern medicine prolongs not living but dying, we need to rethink death itself. Making someone die in a way that others approve, but that he feels is anathema, is an odious form of tyranny. Ilora Finlay and Daniel Sulmasy are of the more outspoken of those against legalizing assisted suicide. Ilora Finlay is a member of the House of Lords, a palliative care physician, and is the president of the British Medical Association. Daniel Sulmasy is a professor of medicine and ethics at the University of Chicago and is a member of the presidential committee on the study of bioethical problems. Ilora argues that legalizing assisted suicide sends a message of despair and hopelessness, They send a message. And the message they send is that if you're terminally ill, ending your life is something that you probably ought to think about.
Ilora also argues that it may not properly protect mentally ill patients, How do you assess capacity commensurate with the biggest decision that you could take; that to end your life? Only 6 percent of Oregon's psychiatrists feel confident to do it. Daniel argues assisted suicide is bad ethical reasoning, bad medicine, bad policy, and is a slippery slope into euthanasia, These all follow logically from arguing for assisted suicide on the basis of maximizing our individual interests. So, if you don't believe in euthanizing severely disabled children or the demented, you might want to rethink your support for assisted suicide, at least if you want to be consistent. Daniel also argues assisted suicide would make us value human life less, Assisted suicide and euthanasia require us to accept that it is morally permissible to act with the specific intention of making a somebody into a nobody, to make them dead. Intentions, not just outcomes, matter in ethics. Daniel also argues against assisted suicide because it would affirm the thought of being a burden for themselves and others that many terminally patients think.
Cite this page
Legalizing Assisted Suicide. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Injustices in a Good Man is Hard to Find
A Literary Analysis of Injustices in A Good Man is Hard to Find
Flannery OConnorr's A Good Man is Hard to Find is a tragic short story that was first published in 1953 and revolves around a single family comprised of a mother, a father, three children, and a grandmother. The family decides to travel to Florida for vacation despite the grandmotherr's claims that an ex-convict by the name Misfit was headed in the same direction. On their way to Florida, the grandmother thinks they are near a plantation house that she remembers from as a young lady.. After a bit of persuasion and deceit, the grandmother convinces her son Bailey to drive them there to see it. The grandmother soon realizes, however, that she is mistaken as to the location of the plantation house but decides not to tell the rest of the family her error. The grandmotherr's cat, that she snuck onto the road-trip without telling anyone, gets out of the basket and frightens Bailey so much that he crashes the car.
Luckily, no one in the car suffers any injuries. Unfortunately, the Misfit and his two henchmen show up at the scene of the crash and gun down the entire family. In this essay, the injustices of murder, unjust prosecution, and violence in society, as they occur in this short story, will be analyzed. The Misfit orders Bobby Lee and Hiram to murder the parents and three children. Well, first you and Bobby Lee get him and that little boy to step over yonder with you There was a pistol shot from the woods, followed closely by another, (O'Connor 24). The children and their parents are ultimately shot to death by Bobby Lee and Hiram for no particular reason. Bobby Lee and Hiram carry out these murders, ordered by the Misfit, without question or hesitation. The men perform these heinous acts casually and with no signs of remorse. No one in the family ever attempts to harm these men. Initially, the family thought that the Misfit and his friends would help rescue them after they crashed their car. To the familyr's surprise, the men exit their vehicle carrying guns and the grandmother immediately identifies one of the men as the Misfit. From what the grandmother says at the beginning of the story, it is clear that she fears the Misfit and is aware of the terrible crimes he has committed against other people (Bandy).
Bobby Lee and Hiram commit murder, perhaps the greatest injustice of all, when they execute the three children and their parents. In the end, the Misfit murders the grandmother. She reached out and touched him on the shoulder. The Misfit sprang back as if a snake had bitten him and shot her three times through the chest, (O'Connor 32). The Misfit guns down the grandmother despite her desperate pleas to spare her life. She listens to the Misfitr's complaints about injustice and religion. She even suggests that prayer may hold the solution to his troubles. She tells him that he is a good man and that she was sure that he comes from nice people. The grandmother, despite her terror, tries desperately to convince the Misfit that he has goodness inside of himself despite being a convicted murderer. She continues to praise him even though he has ordered the murder of her entire family. When she sees that the Misfitr's face is twisted and that he is about to cry, she reaches out to touch him. In a final attempt to extract mercy from the Misfit, the grandmother identifies him as one of her own children (Bandy).
Ultimately, the Misfit murders the grandmother despite her pleas for mercy and words of encouragement. The Misfitr's reaction to the grandmotherr's pleas for mercy is inhumane and unjust. The Misfit claims that he was wrongly convicted and imprisoned for the murder of his own father. My daddy died in the nineteen ought nineteen of the epidemic flu, and I never had a thing to do with it, (O'Connor 28). From what the Misfit tells the grandmother, it is clear that he believes that he was wrongly convicted. He mentions that he is unable to recall if he really committed the crime that he was accused of. Furthermore, the Misfit was only told by the doctor at the penitentiary that he killed his father; he was not given any proof or evidence that he committed the crime (Shmoop Editorial Team).
In a judicial setting, one can only be convicted after the evidence has been provided and proven to be true. The Misfit claims that his father died of epidemic flu and there is no way that he could have caused that. If the Misfitr's claims are true, then an unjust act was committed against him by those held responsible for enforcing justice in our society. The Misfit also claims that he was held in custody without being shown any proof that he had committed a crime. they could prove I had committed one because they had the papers on me They never shown me my papers, (O'Connor 30). He was only told his offense by word of mouth in the hospital by the psychiatrist. The Misfit has the right to be shown the evidence that upholds his conviction in order to realize that his punishment is fitting for his crime. Doling out a punishment that exceeds the nature of the crime committed is an injustice (Flint). The judge is expected to provide the suspect with all the information and an explanation of why they are being detained. The Misfit claims that he was denied this right. If the Misfitr's claims are true, then the judge committed an act of injustice by convicting him without providing adequate information regarding his crime. Violence and injustice are an ever-present threat in our society. Seen a man burnt alive oncet I even seen a woman flogged I found out the crime dont matter," (O'Connor 27 - 29).
The Misfit mentions that he has witnessed acts of injustice carried out upon other people. He once witnessed a man being burned alive and a woman being beaten but never mentions the crimes for which they were accused. From these two examples, it is clear that there are injustices in society pertaining to crime and punishment (Flint). When the story begins, the grandmother is afraid of going to Florida because she believes that it is unsafe due to the alleged presence of the Misfit. Also, the wife of the owner of the Tower is scared that the Misfit may attack their restaurant. It is clear, in this story, that members of society lack feelings of security and safety due to the actions of violent injustices that occur to seemingly innocent people. The Misfitr's techniques of seeking justice are unjust in themselves. then it's nothing for you to do but enjoy the few minutes you got left the best way you can -- by killing somebody or burning down his house or doing some other meanness to him. No pleasure but meanness." (O'Connor 31).
The Misfit chooses to enjoy his time as a free man by committing evil and heinous crimes. He seems to take pride in the fact that he has spent his time killing people and burning their houses down since he escaped from the penitentiary. Despite claiming to be innocent of the crime he was arrested for, he freely admits to orchestrating and committing terrible acts toward other people. By seeking his own justice through violence toward others, the Misfit commits acts of injustice (Peck). It is clear that the Misfit does not feel any guilt from his unjust actions. Furthermore, he mentions that he has realized that the crime does not matter. The Misfit is misguided in his attempt to seek justice for his own wrongful conviction. The Misfit uses unjust actions to seek justice for what he claims to be a wrongful conviction. This essay provides a literary analysis of the unjust acts in Flannery OConnorr's short story, A Good Man is Hard to Find. Several examples of injustice have been names and analyzed. The injustices in this essay include the murder of an entire family, the injustices in society such as burning a human being alive, the wrongful conviction of the Misfit, and the Misfitr's unjust actions in his quest for his own personal justice. This short story gives examples of injustices that may occur in modern-day society which must be avoided in order to maintain feelings of safety and security amongst members of the population.
Works Cited
- O'Connor, Flannery. A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Other Stories. pp. 5 - 32, https://m.learning.hccs.edu/faculty/desmond.lewis/inrw-0420/a-good-man-is-hard-to-find/A%20Good%20Man%20Is%20Hard%20To%20Find.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov. 2018.
- Bandy, Stephen C. "'One of my babies': the misfit and the grandmother." Studies in Short Fiction, vol. 33, no. 1, 1996, p. 107+. Academic OneFile, https://link.galegroup.com.cmsmir.clevelandstatecc.edu/apps/doc/A19638483/AONE?u=tel_a_clscc&sid=AONE&xid=9f45db0c. Accessed 6 Nov. 2018.
- Shmoop Editorial Team. The Misfit in A Good Man Is Hard to Find. Shmoop, Shmoop University, 11 Nov. 2008, www.shmoop.com/good-man-hard-to-find/the-misfit.html. Flint, Thomas P. "ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CIVIL WAR REFERENCES IN FLANNERY O'CONNOR'S 'A GOOD MAN IS HARD TO FIND'." Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, vol. 70, no. 2, 2018, p. 119+.
- Literature Resource Center, https://link.galegroup.com.cmsmir.clevelandstatecc.edu/apps/doc/A546217554/LitRC?u=tel_a_clscc&sid=LitRC&xid=8c10a060. Accessed 6 Nov. 2018. Peck, M. Scott. People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil. Simon and Schuster, 1983.
Cite this page
Injustices In A Good Man Is Hard To Find. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Depiction of Dysfunctional Family in OConnor’s Novel
Cite this page
Depiction Of Dysfunctional Family In OConnor's Novel. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Review of a Good Man is Hard to Find
Cite this page
Review Of A Good Man is Hard to Find. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Characters’ Behaviors in O’Connor’s Novel
Cite this page
Characters' Behaviors In O'Connor's Novel. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Themes of a Good Man is Hard to Find Novel
The short story A Good Man is Hard to find has a lot of different themes involved. Since a long time ago there has being a issue of good versus evil, and thatr's one of the themes. It also has other themes like: family, religion, society, and class. Good versus evil is developed because the grandmother has a confrontation with a superficial sense of goodness and a criminal who is evil. Religion is involved because the grandmother think that the Misfit is a good man, by her beliefs. On the other hand, family is included because there we just like a basic family, adults arguing and the two kids in the back. The grandmother in A Good Man is Hard to Find" gives great importance to being "a lady," and her ideas about what that means reflect an old-fashioned, somewhat upper-crust Southern mindset. In A Good Man is Hard to Find, Flannery OConnor shows the dfferent types of themes that are in the story, these themes are: good vs evil, family, religion, society, and class.
A Good Man is Hard to Find" is confrontation of between a grandmother with a rather superficial sense of goodness, and a criminal who embodies real evil. The grandmother seems to treat goodness mostly as a function of being decent, having good manners, and coming from a family of "the right people". The grandmother describes her family as the right people because they supposedly raised her the right way. The Misfit is the criminal who embodies real evil, the grandmother and the Misfit met in Florida. The Misfit who seems straightforwardly evil, with little to no sense of guilt, and a genuine, desires to do cruel or destructive things for their own sake. Understanding the motivations of The Misfit, and what "goodness" means by contrast, is one of the central puzzles of the story.
The grandmother and The Misfit had a another conformation between each other in that revolves around Jesus and religion. The grandmother brings up praying to Jesus in the hope that she can induce The Misfit to spare her life by appealing to his religious sense. It turns out, however, that The Misfit has probably thought about Jesus more seriously than she has. The Misfit know about Jesus, but he doubts him. The Misfit thinks that there is no real right or wrong, and no ultimate point to life. At the story's climax, the grandmother appears to receive a moment of divine grace, which might transform her and The Misfit. How this ending is understood is the major question of the story.
"A Good Man is Hard to Find" contains some funny comedy about a family, and the ways they get on each other's nerves. They were the kind of family that could be in a movie. There's the two troublesome and annoying kids, the hot-headed dad who tries to maintain control of a situation and fails, the wife busy attending to the baby, and the grandmother, who's a case all to herself. This story is like a comedy, there are a couple of movies or tv shows that are similar to this. Even though it starts as a comedy, it takes a serious turn when the family encounters a criminal, who kills them one by one.
The grandmother in "A Good Man is Hard to Find" gives great importance to being "a lady," and her ideas about what that means reflect an old-fashioned, and a Southern mindset. She uses the n-word and longs for the good old days when kids were polite, people were trustworthy, and there were pretty plantations to visit. All of this leads her to associate being good with coming from a respectable family and behaving like a member of her social class. Her sensibilities are in for quite a shock when she meets The Misfit.
In conclusion, a story can have several different themes in it. Even though the story started about a normal family, they all ended up dying. It is ironic to see the Misfit on the newspaper, and then find in in person. The main characters were the Misfit and the grandmother. The two main characters were involved in most of the themes. In A Good Man is Hard to Find, Flannery OConnor clearly shows the different types of themes that are in the story, these themes are: good vs evil, family, religion, society, and class.
Works Cited
- Shmoop Editorial Team. A Good Man Is Hard to Find Themes. Shmoop, Shmoop University, 11 Nov. 2008, www.shmoop.com/good-man-hard-to-find/themes.html. 09 November 2018
- A Good Man Is Hard to Find. Pullman Strikes Out Introduction, xroads.virginia.edu/~drbr/goodman.html. 09 November 2018
Cite this page
Themes Of A Good Man is Hard To Find Novel. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
Part 1
In this part of his autobiography, Benjamin Franklin describes his early life and how he began to grow and become more successful in America. He dedicates the book to his son, so that his son can learn from mistakes that he made in the past. He says that he would not redo or change his life besides some minor things and moments. He shows throughout this part that he embodies the promise of America. He tells through his life story how dedication, hard work, and creativity can lead to being successful in America. He started off poor and was close with his family. His parents were good role models for him. As he got older, he apprenticed as a printer under his brother for a while and lived with him. During this time, he further developed his already prominent love for reading, writing, and poetry. He taught himself how to improve his writing and other skills by reading books. After growing unhappy with his apprenticeship and relationship with his older brother, he decided to leave Boston, where he grew up, and go to New York.
Once in New York, he met with a printer to try to find work. The printer could not offer Benjamin any work, but told Benjamin to go to Philadelphia and find work with his son. So he went to Philadelphia, but the trip was very difficult. Once he got there, he found housing, slept for a long time, and then found the son. The son could also not give Benjamin any work, but suggested that he worked for another local printer named Keimer. Here he worked for a long time. Keimer had Benjamin stay with the Read family, where he met his future wife. He also became familiar with the governor of Pennsylvania at the time. This governor wrote a letter to Benjaminr's dad telling him how great Benjamin is, and how he thinks that he should start his own printing business. He even offered to help out. Benjamin returned to Boston to visit his family and show his dad the letter, but his dad didn't approve due to Benjamin being so young. The governor of Pennsylvania still wanted Benjamin to pursue his own printing business, so he offered to pay for it himself in the future.
Throughout this time, he began a courtship with his future wife, Miss Read, but her mother suggested that they called it off due to him leaving for England soon. He did, and left for London shortly after. Here he learned that the governor was not a trustworthy man and never really kept his promises, so Benjamin lost faith in him. He also stayed for longer than he anticipated, because he realized that he could tremendously improve his printing skills if he worked in London for a while. So he stayed for a year and a half more, and in that time he did improve a lot.
Upon arriving back to Philadelphia, he trained other printers that worked for Keimer to improve their skills. He then quit working for Keimer because he did not feel he was fit to do the job and tried to find work elsewhere. When he couldn't, he returned to Keimer. Him and a worker, Meredith decided that they wished to own their own printing business that would be better than Keimerr's. After more training and getting some money, they do. They begin to make a profit and even made a newspaper that helped them earn more money. Eventually, Meredith decided that being a printer wasn't what he was made for, and left the business to Ben Franklin. This business is how he began to make more and more money. He was dedicated to his work and worked through long hours of the night to achieve his goals. He rose from being poor through hard work.
Part 2
In the second part of Benjamin Franklinr's autobiography, he discusses many things. However, a big theme in this part is the theme of religion and virtues. He discusses these throughout most of the part, and even thinks that his virtues are more important than the organized religion that everyone else seems to follow. He was not a big fan of public worship, and he only attended one ceremony before he decided that it wasnt what he believed. He thought that their goal was to just make them Presbyterians instead of trying to teach them to be good citizens. Because of this, Benjamin Franklin created his own form of prayer for his own use at home. He also created a list of virtues that he thought were most important and desirable to him, and he worked hard to correct his behavior according to them.
This list of virtues consisted of thirteen different things that Benjamin Franklin thought were the most important. The thirteen virtues were: temperance, silence, order, resolution, frugality, industry, sincerity, justice, moderation, cleanliness, tranquility, chastity, and humility. He was wise enough to know that he could not attempt to fix all of them at once and be successful, so he worked on fixing his life according to one virtue at a time. He would focus on eliminating one fault from his life for a week, then the next week he would focus on eliminating a different one and the same one as the week before. Benjamin Franklin even kept track of these things in a journal using lines and dots.
Of these virtues, Benjamin Franklin said that the hardest one to work on was humility. He always had pride in what her's accomplished, so it was already hard enough to fix it. He also said that even if you work hard and become humble, thatr's just another thing to be proud of. One of our essential questions is, how is it possible to live without committing any faults? I think that Benjamin Franklin sharing that he struggled to be humble is just proof that itr's impossible to live without having any faults. He worked really hard to overcome his pride, and although he did fix it a little bit, he could never fully overcome it and be completely humble. This makes me further believe that we as humans cannot live a fault-free life, no matter how hard we try. He dedicated a large part of his life to correcting his behaviors and trying to live a life without faults, but he never fully succeeded.
Through this part of the book, Benjamin Franklin tells us how he worked hard to amend his behavior and live by the thirteen virtues. Nearing the end of the part, he discusses how he never really got to the point that he wished to be at with his virtues. However, he does tell that his life had improved significantly ever since he started working on correcting his behavior. Benjamin Franklin says that after he started applying his virtues to his life, he felt better and a lot happier than he was before. He says that conversations with others ended up going more smoothly than before, because he was less arrogant and full of himself. He also said that he was overall nicer to others after he spent time working on his virtues. Benjamin Franklin ends the part by talking about how every human struggles with their pride, and how he believes you cant get rid of it. This further ties in the idea that it is impossible to live without faults in your life, and everybody has them.
Part 3
Throughout the third part of his autobiography, Benjamin Franklin discusses many different topics. He talks about how important religion is, and he also talks about politics and the military. During this part, he talks in depth about how much he admired a minister, Samuel Hemphill, and a preacher, George Whitefield. Samuel Hemphillr's sermons focused a lot on virtue, so Benjamin Franklin liked him a lot. George Whitefield had amazing preaching skills, which allowed him to have a lot of power over the citizens of Philadelphia. Benjamin Franklin also talks about reforms he worked hard to change the city of Philadelphia. He discusses all of the things he added to the city and colony that helped things run smoother, such as a military and fire department.
Samuel Hemphill is an Irish minister that has sermons that deeply focus on virtue. Because of this, Benjamin Franklin appreciates and respects his sermons much more. However, not everyone liked Hemphill that much. They didnt like him a lot due to the fact that he borrows a little bit of others works when he makes his sermons, and they think thatr's cheating. To get more people on his side, Franklin writes pamphlets supporting Hemphill, but they still dont like him very much. They kicked him out, so Benjamin stopped going to church. He then talks about how he later met a preacher named George Whitefield. He was very well liked and very powerful among the Philadelphia citizens. They even build him a church to preach in with others. Benjamin Franklin says that Whitefield is an honest, virtuous man. He also publishes George Whitefieldr's journals and sermons. Benjamin respects this man a lot, and says that her's a very good speaker with a loud voice.
Later in the part, Benjamin Franklin discusses politics and military for a long time. Franklin used money earned from the subscriptions to his pamphlet, Plain Truth. Benjamin and Thomas Lawrence go to New York to borrow cannons for their military. After some convincing, they go home with eighteen. As part of the Pennsylvania Governor council, he had certain ideas that Quakers didnt agree with. Benjamin Franklin thinks that they want to support the military and self-defense, but they dont want to oppose their beliefs. The French and Indian War starts, and Benjamin helps General Edward Braddock collect supplies and weapons using his writing. During this part, Benjamin Franklin also tells how he created a public hospital, a fire department, and a college in Philadelphia.
While Franklin was in charge of the army, he led them to build forts. It took them a week to build their fort at Gradenhut. He keeps the soldiers busy, because he believes that people are happier if theyre doing something. Their fort isnt the best, but they have enough weapons to defend themselves. Eventually, Franklin becomes a colonel, and he gets honorary escorts. This offends a person who owns the colony, so that person complains to Sir Everard Fawkener. However, Fawkener sides with Franklin and doesnt do anything about it. The governor wants Franklin to become a general to replace Braddock, and he wants him to recover Fort Duquense. Franklin turns down the offer, and Braddock is replaced by someone else. Benjamin then spends most of the rest of the part talking about science, philosophy, and various experiments he conducted later in his life.
Part 4
In the final part of his autobiography, Benjamin Franklin tells us about a problem between the governor and the English assembly. He visits London with his son to see Dr. Fothergill to address the issue. Fothergill then tells them that they should take matters up with the people that own the colonies. He then visits someone, who takes him to meet a man named John Hanbury. They meet the president of the Kingr's privy council, Lord Granville. Franklin believes that American people should be able to make their own laws, and the king should just have to approve it. Lord Granville believes that the Kingr's instructions are laws, and that Americans have to follow them. Benjamin Franklin writes down what they had said to each other to use for future reference. He then realizes that a long time ago, they had also tried to make the Kingr's instructions a law, but it got thrown out.
There is then a meeting between the owners of the colonies and Benjamin Franklin. They all try to be nice at first and explain their sides calmly, but when they cant agree, things get more heated. The colony owners give a complaint Benjamin wrote on behalf of the colonies to their lawyer, Ferdinando John Paris, who pretty much hates Benjamin. Everyone tries to get Ferdinando and Benjamin to talk to each other and deal with the issue, but Benjamin wont budge. Paris tells the colony owners to send the complaint to someone else, but that person never got back fo Franklin. They just called him rude and refused to address the complaint.
This leads Franklin to believe that he wasnt proper enough when writing his complaint, which isnt normal for him. All the worry is for nothing, though, because Franklin gets his way in the end. The assembly passed an act that taxes the colony owners estates as well as the peopler's estates. This makes the colony owners very unhappy, so they try to get the King to make sure it doesnt happen. When they went to court, they try to say that the act will ruin their relationship with the people. However, Franklin and the Assembly say that it won't hurt anyone, and if the money gets repealed many people would become bankrupt. Then a man named Lord Mansfield takes Benjamin and Ferdinando to sign an agreement. This helps the law pass. The colony owners are still unhappy, though, and get the governor fired.
All in all, The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin shows all of the different ways that Benjamin Franklin impacted America. He worked in politics and the military, cared deeply about politics and religion, and worked hard to become a successful person. He worked on respected people of all religions. He also contributed to science and various things in Philadelphia. He helped plan the first university, public library, public hospital, and more. He used hard work and dedication to fulfill the American promise and rise to success. His views on virtue helped him correct his behavior. He had a better life and become a better person because of it. This autobiography has many reoccurring themes, such as religion, principles, education, and dedication. He wanted women to be able to have access to education. Overall, this book has shown us how much work went into our history, especially by Benjamin Franklin. Without him, many things in our country would be different. He is a prime example of what the American promise that hardwork and dedication lead to success. He also shows that everyone makes mistakes and thatr's okay.
Cite this page
Autobiography Of Benjamin Franklin. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
What did Benjamin Franklin Contribute to America?
Cite this page
What Did Benjamin Franklin Contribute To America?. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Benjamin Franklin: a Learning Lover
Cite this page
Benjamin Franklin: A Learning Lover. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Analysis of the Autography of Benjamin Franklin
Cite this page
Analysis Of The Autography Of Benjamin Franklin. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Establishment of Library in Philadelphia
Establishment of the public library in Philadelphia and its effects
Benjamin Franklin loved books he spent most of his time reading Reading was the only delight I allowed myself. I spent no time in hostelries, games, or frolicks of any kind; (Franklin, 1986: Chapter 5) . Also, he was a member of a group of people whom would come together hold club meeting where they read and shared books. Franklin felt that it would be much better if the group began an internal library where everyone would pitch in their collection of books. They would lend these books to each other and would have a continuous flow of books for their reading. All the members of the club agreed, and that led them to the opening of a small library at Mr Grace's where they had been holding their meetings.
Contrary to what they expected the library did not do well. For starters, the books they put together, each member bringing their collection, were not as much as they expected. Also, managing the group was very hectic because there were inconveniences in caring for the books. Therefore, the library was dissolved, and everyone took back their books. However, Franklin considered the idea of having a public library was very beneficial. Consequently, he brought forth the approach to the Junto members and on 1st July 1731 they came up with the terms and conditions for the subscribers.
Also, they contributed the capital which they used to buy new books for the library. They also agreed on an amount that they would contribute on a yearly basis. The library began with a total of 50 subscribers who would invest 40 shillings whereby 10 shillings were purchasing more books thus adding to the library's collection. The library was being opened once per week whereby subscribers would lend books and return borrowed books. Late returns were fined double the price of the book. The library was very beneficial to the community because they had access to books thus improving their conversations.
Franklin's moral perfection
Franklin wanted to have a life whereby he would not commit any faults "it was about this time I comprehended the bold and laborious project of reaching to moral perfection. I coveted to live without committing to any fault at any time;" (Franklin, 1986: Chapter 6). Knowing what was right and wrong, Franklin assured himself that he would do one thing to avoid the other. Franklin found that it was challenging to live without faults. Therefore, he concluded that it was not adequate to prevent the slip-ups, but it was better to acquire and establish the right habits avoiding the contrary ones. In all the years that Franklin had spent reading he had received different virtues shown by various writers, and each writer gave diverse meanings to those virtues.
He came up with a method which included 13 virtues that were necessary to him at the time and made them more understandable with fewer ideas placed on them. Since he intended to attain all the thirteen virtues, he saw it necessary to deal with each at its own time until he had achieved to live by all of them. After making the virtues his habits, he came up with a table whereby he crossed the days of the week against the thirteen virtues. The purpose of that table was to help him find out the virtues he experienced difficulty and what days of the week.
On the table, he concentrated on one virtue each week ensuring that he perfected on that specific virtue on its week of concentration. Throughout the year he would go through four seasons of strengthening each morality in its week. Later on, he improved his table to a memorandum book in which he went through on program in the year. For Franklin, the order moral was the most challenging virtue of maintaining, and therefore he came up with a plan which included all the 24 hours of the day and what he was to do in every hour. But being a businessman who travelled a lot, it was complicated to stick to the schedule he had created.
Also, order regarding placing things where they were supposed to be Franklin found it exceedingly problematic to maintain. At some point due to continued imperfection in that area he wanted to give up " and I made so little progress in the modification and had such regular relapses, that I was ready to give up the effort, and content myself with a defective character in that respect "( Franklin, 1986: Chapter 6). According to Franklin, the phrase "a speckled axe is best" he meant that it is better to try to attain morality regardless of the many obstacles there are to face than to wholly give in to immoral preferences. By struggling against evil a person will have both virtuous and wicked appearances which were more satisfactory than not trying at all
Religious Background of Franklin
Franklin was a very holy man, and he believed in the Bible. In his autobiography, he mentions a travelling doctor in England who spitefully biased the Bible's message. Franklin described this doctor as wicked for disrespecting the Bible showing that Franklin knew what the Bible says and understood the meaning. Besides, the morals that he was striving to attain, one of them was humility which he described as the imitation of Jesus and Socrates which meant that he knew about Jesus and His doings thus wanting to emulate them. Therefore, Franklin depicts himself as one who had studied the Bible. Also, in his little book he had quoted the book of Proverb from the Bible and used the word as his motto. He was also prayerful as illustrated in the different prayers he had cited in his little book as guidance in achieving moral perfection. For instance: And conceiving God to be the cascade of wisdom, I thought it right and essential to solicit his aid for obtaining it; to this end, I moulded the following little prayer, which was prefaced to my tables of examination, for daily use. (Franklin, 1986: Chapter 6).
Reference
- Franklin, B. (1986). The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
Cite this page
Establishment Of Library In Philadelphia. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/
Harriet Tubman’s Fight against Slavery
Cite this page
Harriet Tubman's Fight Against Slavery. (2019, Jun 10).
Retrieved November 7, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/21/