Month: June 2019
Who was the Best Progressive Era President
During the Progressive Era, America had a lot of issues to address. Some issues included political corruption, monopolies, land loss, and poor working conditions. The second president during the Progressive Era, President William Howard Taft, seemed to be the most progressive by busting the most trusts and protecting consumers.
First, Taft busted twice as many monopolies as the Great Trust-Buster Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt busted the trusts that he believed were bad, but Taft busted all of them. This trust-busting shows that Taft was the best because he busted all of them regardless of his own opinion. Secondly, Taft strengthened the Interstate Commerce Commission by allowing, Congress to pass the Mann-Elkins Act of 1910 which authorized the Interstate commerce Commission to set rates for railroads. The act also expanded the Interstate Commerce Commission's authority to cover telephones, telegraphs, and radios (millercenter.org). This act made Taft successful because it protected consumers, the working class, which was one of the main goals of the Progressive Era. Thirdly, Taft established the Postal Savings System which provided working class families a safe place to invest funds, encouraged deposits from people who were afraid of using private banks, increased the supply of currency, and made bank services available to working people who did not have time to travel to far away banks (the Ultimate History Project). The Postal Savings System was also successful because it also protected consumers. Fourth, Taft passed the Sixteenth Amendment which reduced the federal government's authority to tax income without equally dividing it up among the states and the Seventeenth Amendment which allowed the direct election of senators. These amendments were just another important aspect because they decreased political corruption, which was another major goal of the Progressive Era.
Theodore Roosevelt deserves the grade of a B- because during his presidency he set the precedent for the future presidents. He was a very popular president, but he did not accomplish as many goals that Taft and Wilson did. Taft deserves an A because he achieved nearly all the Progressive Era goals. Lastly, Wilson deserves a B because he protected consumers and the environment, but he engaged in World War I in 1917.
Cite this page
Who Was the Best Progressive Era President. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Mary Harris Jones
Mary Harris Jones, also remembered as 'Mother Jones' was an irish immigrant born in 1830. After losing her family to yellow fever she became a motivational public speaker who worked towards the rights of the working class. Jones was a union activist for the knights of labor and helped to organize strikes for the working class. Mother Jones worked on behalf of workers in the railroad, steel, copper, brewing, garment, and textile industries (Mary Harris Jones 1). She was nicknamed Mother Jones by coal miners during a strike that was in response to wage cuts. Jones was viewed as an inspiration. A New York Times article about her describes one of her speeches about her and her 'army'. She denounced child labor, saying that the children were pitched from the cradle to the factories to sweat out their lives for capitalists ('MOTHER' JONES KEEPS MOVING 1). The press brought even more attention to her and her cause, and helped her become a famous public figure. Some of her accomplishments included establishing the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), founding the Social Democratic Party, and being a threat to the rich capitalists. She continued her work for the rest of her life. At around 80 a miner described, Her hair was snow white but she was yet full of fight and that She fired [strikers] with enthusiasm, she burned them with criticism, then cried with them because of their abuses. The miners loved, worshipped, and adored her. . . (Mary Jones 6). She was very passionate about what she did, and workers loved her for it. Jones contributed to the progressive era by calling attention to the pressing issues of child labor, terrible conditions, and unfair wages.
Mary Harris Jones promoted moral improvement by speaking out against child labor. She also protected social welfare of citizens by organizing and supporting strikes which in many cases prevented rich owners from lowering wages to an unlivable amount in doing this Jones created economic reform. During her life she called out the government many times, saying they should be more accountable and efficient. One example of this was when, as one article describes, She led a parade of 400 children, some of them crippled by industrial accidents, from Philadelphia to New York to publicize the scandal of child labor (5). It goes on to say that Jones planned to visit President Theodore Roosevelt at his Oyster Bay home as a finale, but he refused to meet her (Mary Jones 5). Mother Jones was an important figure in the progressive era, and worked for change.
Today Mary Harris Jones and other progressives from the era would be likely to speak out against some of the policies in place today and the choices being made by our government. For instance a few weeks ago Republican candidate Brett Kavanaugh was chosen by President Donald Trump for the open Supreme Court seat. However Dr. Blasey came forward with sexual assault allegations against him. Despite her emotional testimony and Kavanaugh's multiple outbursts combined with his outright disrespectful behavior, no evidence was found and he was sworn in. Mother Jones stood for the rights of the working class, against the government and people of power who were treating the working class unfairly. This could translate to the President's horrible treatment of Dr. Ford and the lack of presence the citizens' voice has to make changes today.
Cite this page
Mary Harris Jones. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Speech Analysis Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
The Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation was an impacting speech that affected the course of the world's history. This speech to the members of the Senate and the House of Representatives was a striking response towards the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese Empire. President Roosevelt had been a senator in the New York Legislature, an assistant secretary to the Navy, and the Governor of New York, thus as an experienced politician, Roosevelt knew how to properly address his audience and spoke slowly with a firm and clear voice.
Throughout the speech, the president maintains the firm voice, often pausing between words and sentences for clarity and emphasis. He also makes frequent eye contact with his audience. He also raises his speaking volume to emphasize certain words. He raised his voice in words, such as American and righteous. President Franklin Roosevelt used the rhetorical technique of Ethos to set his authority and credibility of his speech. He also was able to use Pathos, a rhetorical technique, to target the emotional anger, sadness, and fervor that the nation had. For example, Roosevelt says, I regret to tell you that very many American have been lost... the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory. President Roosevelt's address contains a series of repetitions.
He begins the repetition by saying the phrase, Last night, the Japanese forces attacked (Roosevelt). He then lists the places conquered by the Japanese. Through this repetition, Roosevelt emphasizes the necessity to prevent the further impact of the Japanese in the Pacific and thus take offensive measures against the Empire of Japan. The end of the address contains the purpose of President Roosevelt's speech. The speech ends by saying, I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire (Roosevelt). The speech ends with frequent pauses for emphasis and changes in volume. Certainly, President Roosevelt's speech to Congress further ignited the fervor and patriotism of the members of Congress and the people of the United States of America.
Cite this page
Speech Analysis Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
The Progressive Era during the 1890s to the 1920s in the United States
During the 1890s to the 1920s, the Progressive Era widely impacted the lives of millions of U.S citizens and local governments creating a need for reform.
It is created on the idea of progress mainly involving technology, science, social associations, and economic progress that are significant in improving our society. When the movement first emerged, it was improved with numerous efforts in order to respond to the problems created by big corporations and the unregulated growth of cities. Majority of progressives mutualized over a strong belief that science and knowledge could improve society, and that governments should take an active role in solving society's problems, (New York Times). However, progressives diverged widely in their actions and views. Some focused on making governments more efficient, while others worked to make government more alert voters. Together not only did these progressives allied beside one another in order to keep up their efforts on reforming society while showing their success along the way, but so did the presidents during this era who contributed and made immense changes to the U.S in political, economic, and social ways.
As the 19th century came to a close a new epoch, known as the Progressive Era emerged in response to industrialization. This early 20th century reform movement pursued control of the government to the people. In order to reinstate economic opportunities and to correct inequity in American life. Progressives believed that government could be used as a powerful tool for social improvement, (Gillon, Matson 2009). Although the Progressive ideal was presented by numerous Progressive authors of different genre, together they all presented the impact of the economic, political, social, and moral reforms of the American Society.
The society was rehabilitated when politically progressivism entered the time of three presidents, Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson. It first entered during Theodore Roosevelt's administration when he had begun with the expansion of his own presidential power and changed it for increasing the powers for the federal government. (American Yawp). While promoting progressive reforms, he wanted to guarantee that the interests of private concerns did not hurt public interests. In order to end it, he confronted the monopolies of trusts and created a government bureau to watch over the undertakings of corporations, and strapped for laws that would protect.
The Progressive Era signaled that a turning point had been reached for many Americans who were suddenly willing to confront the age's problems with national political solutions. Reformers sought to bring order to chaos, to bring efficiency to inefficiency, and to bring justice to injustice. Causes varied, constituencies shifted, and the tangible effects of so much energy was difficult to measure, but the Progressive Era signaled a bursting of long-simmering tensions and introduced new patterns in the relationship between American society, American culture, and American politics.
Cite this page
The Progressive Era During the 1890s to the 1920s in the United States. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Islam and Hinduism
Many religions vary in different ways, ranging from their practice method to the amount of idols or gods they worship. Islam and Hinduism are two very popular religions that have major aspects that separate them from one another.
One major difference between the two religions is that Hinduism is a polytheistic religion and Islam is a monotheistic religion. A polytheistic religion is one that believes in or worships more than one God. Although Hinduism has a belief of multiple gods, they do have some higher than the others such as Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. Sometimes above the many gods a polytheistic religion will have a supreme creator and focus of devotion, (Smart). In many polytheistic religions, it is also common for there to be a belief in ghostly and demonic figures in addition to the gods. Some who believe in a polytheistic religion may choose just one god that they greatly correspond with and only worship it. This is so common because these gods often have human-like characteristics and so some people may connect to certain gods more than they do the others.A monotheistic religion is the belief in only one god. God in monotheism is conceived of as the creator of the world and of humanity; he has not abandoned his creation but continues to lead it through his power and wisdom; (van Baaren). This quote is saying that in monotheism, one God does everything. He creates the whole world, everything in it, and the humanities of it. Islam is monotheism because the religion focuses on only one god, not many. This in comparison to polytheism is extremely different because in a polytheistic religion there is typically a god for everything starting with how Earth began to the humanities while in monotheism one god does it all.
Hinduism is the oldest religion dating back more than 4000 years ago. It's hard to find the direct origin of Hinduism but it is known that 95% of all Hindus live in India. This is believed to be because of the Aryans bringing hymns they created to India. These hymns were said to be based off real historical events. Vedas are ancient Hindu scriptures that contain philosophy, priests rituals, and the hymns mentioned before that were all originally spread by word of mouth for a long period of time until they were, finally, written down.Different from Hinduism, Islam began in a place called Mecca which is now known as Saudi Arabia. There are over 1.5 billion Muslims all over the world which is extremely crazy considering it's the youngest out of the top most popular religions. Islam originated because of the Prophet Muhammad. Muhammad was said to be the last in a long line of prophets that included Jesus and Moses. It is said by Muslims that Muhammad started having visions and hearing voices, this led to the Qur'an which is the holy book of Islam. Many Muslims believe the Qur'an was made of the pre-existent words of Allah, who is the Islamic God.
Even the ways both Hinduism and Islam began are both disparate. As mentioned, Hinduism was originated by word of mouth of people over many years while Islam had one man who claimed to have angelic visions. Both religions vary in places too, such as Hinduism remaining mainly in India as many muslims remain in Saudi Arabia. Even the places of where these religions are located will greatly affect the culture and beliefs they have and that can be another cause as to why they are so different from one another.Both religions are practiced in different ways with few similarities. Hindu worship is typically called puja. In most cases, worship for Hindus takes place at home at the family shrine or at a temple. Most worship is individual or family based. A worshiper may go to the temple to give thanks or to ask for assistance. While, Muslim worship is crucial as they believe worship is the main reason for their existence. Muslims worship Allah to show their love and submission. People who follow Islam typically attend Friday prayers where they listen to a sermon and pray with each other. They also commonly use fasting and praying as ways to worship. Fasting is one thing both religions have in common. This is one of the few similarities the two religions have within their worshiping.
The afterlife beliefs of Hindus and Muslims is also different from one another. Hinduism believes in the rebirth, or reincarnation of souls. They believe souls should continue being born again until they overcome the state of delusion. The cycle of death and rebirth will end when the soul finally realizes its true nature. Hinduism does believe in heaven as mentioned in sacred text, there are 14 levels of existence. The highest realm being the world of Brahman (god) and the lowest being the nether worlds where the sinners are punished. These worlds are called Yamaloka after Yama, the Lord of Justice. On the other hand, Muslims believe that their deeds in life and on earth will be what decides if they go to heaven or not. They believe that there will be a day that they will be placed in front of god and judged, god will weigh their good and their bad deeds. If the they have more good than bad then they will make it into their heaven. Those who have bad deeds that outweigh their good will be punished and won't enter heaven. Also, some bad deeds their god will forgive them for before being judged. Both religions do believe in some sort of after life and neither believe that the only life is here on Earth but they do believe in different things happening after death.
The goals both religions have are also different. Hindus believe that their goal is to break the cycle of reincarnation. They believe once their cycle is broken, they've attained their salvation. The goals of Islam is to serve all humans, using their love and compassion. Then their goal is to commit more good than bad so they can make it into their heaven.
As its known, Hinduism is slightly based off mythology. Within mythology is very common to see a mythological king with more than one wife, which is contradicting Hindu men are to only marry one woman. This is different from islam where a muslim man may have more than one wife, yet women are to only have one husband or else it's a sin.
Confessing sins, or asking for repentance is also different for both religions. For Hindus, unintentional sins are forgiven, but if a Hindu commits a sin on purpose they get punished. This punishment is called karmic consequences and it's where bad things happen to the person who commited the bad deed to basically even out what they have done. For muslims, the belief is that only god can do forgiving. He should be the first one asked for forgiveness unless the bad deed was done to a person or thing, then forgiveness must be obtained from them first.
Overall Hinduism and Islam are two very different religions. Down to the basics of where they both originated to their views on an afterlife, forgiveness, and their goals they each have. With both of them being such large religions it's hard to believe the amount of differences they have.
Cite this page
Islam and Hinduism. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Why Cash for Kidneys is Better than Organ Donation
A kidney transplant is the most performed organ transplant throughout the world. Owing to the challenges that dialysis exposes many individuals with chronic kidney ailments that include reduced life expectancy and low quality of life, but kidney transplantation gives kidney patients the best opportunity to live quality lives with average life expectancy (Becker and Elias, 222-25 ). More importantly, the two ways through which kidney patients can acquire kidneys from donors are cash for the kidney and organ donations. Also, cash for kidneys is used with payment of donors, but Organ donation does not.
To begin with, organ donation is a basic method of exchange owing to the negotiated agreements of the giver and receiver. Kidney donation happens through the willingness of the giver rather than through the influence of the demand and supply. As such, kidney donations fail in meeting the set goals by the shortage of donors. Additionally, the steady surge in delays in getting kidney transplants is firmly connected to significant dependence on kidney donations. Donator s willing to give their kidneys are discouraged by the financial rewards others want to receive by selling their kidneys.
Even the majority of family members of a dead loved one would not sell their members organs for money. (Financial Incentives for Organ Donation, 220-21) Currently, the waiting period for a kidney transplant is usually about four years. As such, people that are scheduled for a kidney transplant, have to wait about four years or so before they can get the treatments necessary. Admittedly, due to the long wait, individuals have to live lives of low quality stretching out the time they have to still deal with the dialysis.
Given that kidney donations happen on informed consent, solving the problem of kidney shortage remains questionable. This information is based on the fact that many individuals who give their permission to donate their kidneys when they die to end up changing their decisions later. For this reason, relying on kidney donations make it hard for planned surgeries to be started on time due to the lack of donated kidneys shall be available at a given time. In turn, due to patients waiting period lengthened, many patients are disappointed that they have to wait even longer. Contrarily, getting cash for kidneys motivates more people to donate a healthy kidney they have, which increases the number of kidneys in supply (Becker and Elias, 222-25). Realistically, paying for kidney does not increase the cost of transplants by significant amounts, and patients guaranteed of getting the transplant started on time since the donors commit to the agreements stated.
Also, cash for kidney s (payment of donors) enable donors to receive proportionate 94financial rewards stopping them from taking advantage of health facilities or individuals who may take advantage of donors by issuing them with minor financial rewards. For clarity, valuation of kidneys is done by relying on factors such as the health risks that donors face after surgery, the reality of noticeable reduction in quality of life, and days spent out of work as donors recover from the procedures. While it is common for organ donators to be exploited, paid donors on the other hand sometimes get deceived owing to desperation to undergo surgery on time. In response, The amounts paid to live donors are limited. As such, some countries have fixed maximum and minimum kidney prices to control these kidney markets accurately by eliminating low payment and lies. Recently, payments to cadaveric donors used to be made after their death. As such, they used not to utilize their compensations. In response to this, quicker payments are encouraged so that even cases whereby relatives would refuse to accomplish the wishes of dead donors can be overturned. Overall, cash for kidneys benefits kidney patients and health systems in general, more than organ donations in exchange for unstandardized incentives.
In conclusion, cash for kidneys is more effective in raising the supply of kidneys to match the demand for kidneys than a donation. organ donation contributes hugely to obtaining kidneys for transplantation. Howeve, a lot of people rely on organ donations by empathetic donors, but the amount of kidneys remains low. Conversely, the establishment of a market for organs allows for fair payment for donors.
Cite this page
Why Cash For Kidneys is Better Than Organ Donation. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
The Debate on Legalizing Prostitution
My personal belief on prostitution is that it should be decriminalized and legalized in the United States. If we decriminalize prostitution, we would help not only women but society as a whole. If sex for money was made legal and recognized as a career choice and occupation it would make being a sex worker safer, improve their health, help decrease the exploitation of women, and help curb sex trafficking. The legalization of prostitution would allow sex workers to have the same rights and protections as any other worker. It would also help generate money in the form of taxes for the state or federal government. My belief comes from what I have learned as an adult about the sex trade industry. Growing up, I was taught that prostitution was dirty and bad, and not an adequate or respectable life choice. Now I see that not everyone makes this life choice willingly.
Prostitution is known as the oldest profession in the world and is viewed by society as morally wrong. The criminalization of prostitution seems to do more harm than good, aside from being unsuccessful in stopping prostitution it only continues to allow for more sex trafficking and sex crimes against women (Hall Blanco, 2018). Many sex workers are poor and come from broken homes and violence and they see prostitution as their only way to make a living. In legalizing prostitution, we may be able to help decrease the spread of disease and sex crimes against sex workers. Society does not like the idea of money being exchanged for sex but this is a moral viewpoint that should not be allowed in legislation (Barkan, 2017).
My position is against the legalization of prostitution. The importance of studying prostitution is so that we as a society learn to better understand sex workers, their world and their impact on the world around us. If we have a better understanding perhaps society can come up with solutions to issues that come from prostitution like sex crimes. It's important to keep prostitution illegal because if legalized there is the possibility of it making sex trafficking, and prostitution more rampant. The reality of things is that we as a society do not know what would happen is prostitution was made legal. It is much easier to take the moral high ground and say that its wrong and needs to be criminalized in order to try and discourage such behavior, but if history has taught us anything is once government sets a ban, a black market simply helps supply the ongoing and in some cases increasing demand.
The legalization of prostitution can be beneficial to society because it would allow the government to collect additional tax revenues that can be used to fund public programs. It would also help public health by decreasing sexually transmitted infections and AIDS/HIV. If prostitution were made legal, law enforcement officers would have more time to fight real criminals that are a menace to society, instead of wasting their time arresting sex workers. Prostitution can be harmful to society because of the way it treats women, we live in a society where men are the dominant ones and women are seen as passive and submissive. Prostitution also further reinforces the idea that women are sex objects for men to have and enjoy at their disposal. Prostitution leads to other issues such as drug use, alcohol abuse, mental health issues from trauma caused to the sex workers, and the freedom that is taken away from individuals because of sex trafficking. In keeping prostitution illegal, society will only continue to have its only going issues with sex trafficking, prostitution, the spread of disease and the mistreatment of women by their customers or pimps.
Prostitution appears in Chapter 15, titled Consensual Crime. In this chapter the author talks about the history of prostitution and the debate for its legalization. The author lists the reasons why people are either for or against legalized prostitution. The author mentions how prostitution and brothels were very common in the U.S. during the 1800's but by the 1900's an anti-brothel moral crusade (Barken, 2017, p. 304) made a majority close its doors. And despite the effort to end prostitution and close down brothels, they still continued to exist in the U.S. By banning prostitution or simply by saying that its morally wrong has not and will not discourage people from participating in prostitution, whether it be the customer or sex worker. Prohibiting prostitution does nothing to help sex workers exit the industry or provide them with education or other skills. (Hall Blanco, 2017). Keeping prostitution illegal does not address its inherent problems, but it does prevent a productive dialogue on the subject.
References
Barken, Steven E. (2017). Consensual Crime. In Criminology: a sociological
understanding (pp. 304-306). Boston: Pearson.
Blanco, A. H. (2018). Prohibition of Prostitution Encourages Organized Crime. In
Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale. (Reprinted from Let's Talk
About Sex (Work), InsideSources, 2017, February 13) Retrieved from https://link.galegroup.com.libproxy.elac.edu/apps/doc/JERJMD033131105/OVIC?u=mont93762&sid=OVIC&xid=9fea47a8
Cite this page
The Debate on Legalizing Prostitution. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Patriarchy and Prostitution: Sex Trafficking in South Korea
Ever since the Mongol Empire, prostitution and sex trafficking have been unspoken components in Korean culture. Sexual domination and violence were cruel and ruthless concessions made by defeated Korean subjects to appeal to the invading forces. The Korean state was forced to round up young females and send them as 'kongnyo' or tribute women (Soh, 2004). This systematic victimization continued throughout the eventual conquests and occupation by the Chinese dynasties until the early 20th century. In some cases, young Korean women and girls were sent to China as sex slaves to Chinese masters. Returning to their homeland led to secondary victimization. In Korea, women are compared to rags. Once they are 'dropped' and 'dirtied' again, they can never be clean again (Lee, 2016). Former victims were stigmatized and disowned by their family. During the 35 year occupation of the Japanese Empire (1910-1945), Korean females, once again became victims of sexual exploitation and used as comfort women. Under the Japanese, the Korean state oversaw the institution of 'kisaeng,' who, as entertainers (analogous to Japan's geishas), sometimes engaged in prostitution (Soh, 2004).
After the U.S. troops entered the peninsula in 1945, prostitution was rendered illegal. However, it remained an ignored problem. From the 1950's to the 1970's, the United States Forces in Korea (USFK) and the Republic of Korea cooperatively agreed to set up 'rest and relaxation' centers for U.S. troops (Hughes, Chon & Ellerman, 2007). To reduce the spread of venereal disease among prostitutes and U.S. servicemen, the Korean government rounded up prostitutes near U.S. bases [and took] them to clinics for group venereal disease examinations and penicillin injections (Zimelis, 2009).
With Western influences, the South Korean economy began to industrialize and grow. Skyscrapers emerged in the midst of traditional Buddhist temples and craggy mountains. American businesses and chain restaurants changed the Korean landscape to bustling neon-lit cities. Globalization made Korea an economic powerhouse in Asia. Dr. Nayong Lee, Professor at Chung-Ang University, stated [Korea] doesn't admit that it grew the economy by exploiting women (Lee, 2016).
Very similarly to Western societies, runaway youth continue to be extremely vulnerable. Girls who leave volatile homes (alcoholism, mental health concerns) and sexual assault by male family members have very little resources for support. According to a 2012 survey conducted by the Seoul Metropolitan Movement, nearly half of all female runaways end up in prostitution (Lee, 2016). The basic needs of shelter, adequate clothing, and food take precedence over dignity. Nefarious employment agencies seek out women who are experiencing debt. Financially strapped Korean women enter prostitution as a way to pay of credit card debt (Hughes, 2004). Pimps, sometimes sponsored by organized crime groups, utilize debt bondage to control their victims. Women may be given sums of money or fashion clothing under the false pretenses that they would be able to reimburse their pimp. However, the pimp imposes additional fees for food, transportation to other bars, and missing work to the point that the victim would not be able to make any financial headway.
In 1991, the Soviet Union broke away into separate republics. In the same year, the U.S. Department of Defense closed its military bases at Subic Bay and Clark Air Force Base. Both events created economic instability in the former Soviet republics and the Philippines. As a result, South Korea witnessed an increase of Russian and Filipina women entering the entertainment business on E-6 visas.
In addition to luring victims by providing initial monetary and/or material reimbursement, traffickers may make false promises of legitimate jobs. Traffickers and illegitimate employment agencies offer hospitality (waitress, bar staff) or entertainment jobs (vocalist, dancer) to foreign women in developing areas. These fabricated jobs eventually lead to prostitution in hazardous conditions. Even more astonishing are the sporadic reports of U.S. military members actively involved with the international trafficking of Korean women to American massage parlors (Hughes, et al., 2007). American soldiers marry the Korean, or Filipina in a sham marriage, thereby giving her sponsorship necessary to enter the U.S. Once the newly married couple arrives in the United States, the service member divorces, delivers and sells his wife to a massage parlor or another pimp. Hughes, et al (2007) and Goldman (2002) quoted one INS agent. I don't recall even having interviewed a Korean prostitute in [the United States] that was not in the country as a result of being married to an American serviceman.
Sex trafficking victims, regardless of nationality (Korean, Russian, or Filipina), are stigmatized by society. Conventional wisdom among those interviewed in Jason Lee's 2016 documentary Save My Seoul depicts apathy and a lack of sympathy for sex trafficking victims. Male interviewees rationalized that the victims are willing participants with the intent to earn money, that there is no victimization. Other Koreans consider prostitution as a necessary evil possibly noting Korea's patriarchal mores and customs in heterosexual relationships and the belief that sexual services are essential in maintaining partnerships with an occupying force at the expense of women's rights.
Some scoff off concern by stating that the government seems to be taking care of it. The question How? is up for argument. The U.S. State Department rated the Republic of Korea as a Tier 1 country in its efforts to thwart human trafficking. The 2017 Trafficking in Persons Report (TIP) from the U.S. State Department noted the following:
The government demonstrated serious and sustained efforts by increasing the number of trafficking investigations, prosecutions, and convictions compared to the previous reporting period, conducting numerous awareness raising campaigns, providing services to 7.397 potential trafficking victims, and strengthening procedures to prevent trafficking among entertainment visa holders.
In 2004, South Korea instituted new anti-prostitution laws intended to better protect victims of forced prostitution (Yea, 2006). Yea (2006) continued that sanctions against traffickers [do] not specify details of compensation for debt bonded and financially exploited victims. Escape from the bowels of prostitution proves to be a difficult process. Korean police still regard prostitutes not as victims, but as consenting participants in criminal activity. Corruption within the Korean criminal justice system leads to an enormous amount of distrust in reporting victimization. Women who seek help from the police have been returned to their pimps. Once returned, the pimps use physical violence to punish the girls for fleeing. Through bribes and association, police officers disregard complaints or assist victims to rehabilitative services. Skeptics noted that while the USFK does not condone prostitution, military police presence in known bars and brothels serve as a means to protect the business and maintain order under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Although some service members have assisted in rescuing victims from their pimps, many more new victims fall prey to sex trafficking.
One may hope that a new day is rising in The Land of the Morning Calm. In 2014, the USFK cracked down on Juicy Bars and other nightclubs surrounding military installations by deeming them off-limits. According to a July 6, 2014 Stars and Stripes article, such initiatives have helped dramatically lower the clusters of establishments thought to be involved with prostitution and human trafficking (Rowland & Chang, 2014). South Korean governmental agencies began conducting inspections of nightclub establishments, especially those employing foreigners with E-6 visas. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), such as Candy Cafe and Korea Church World United (KCWU) have been established to provide sanctuary to victims who have escaped their captors. Some assist foreign women to return to their home countries. Escape is difficult- living with the emotional scars consists of intense therapy to confront sexual and psychological trauma.
It is even more difficult to change Korea's patriarchal and misogynistic beliefs in respect to acknowledging prostitution as violence against women. Jason Lee's Save My Seoul addressed this disturbing practice. Such documentaries are necessary, along with other media coverage, to bring awareness to everyday Koreans. It is time for Korea to challenge centuries of exploitative practices.
References
Hughes, D.M., Chon, K.Y. & Ellerman, D.P. (2007). Modern-day comfort women: The U.S. military, transnational crime, and the trafficking of women. Violence Against Women, 13(9), 901-922. doi: 10.1177/1077801207305218
Lee, J.Y. (Director). (2016). Save my Seoul [Motion Picture]. [With E. Lee]. United States: Gravitas Ventures.
Republic of Korea: Office to monitor and combat trafficking in persons. Retrieved from the U.S. Department of State website: https://www.state.gov
Cite this page
Patriarchy and Prostitution: Sex Trafficking in South Korea. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Pain and Prostitution: the Evolution of Female Chastity in Ancient and Late Imperial China
It would be inappropriate to sentence him to the penalty for coercion. Not only were these cases ignored but this situation would also be predominantly classified as illicit sex, resulting in physical punishments inflicted on both the woman and the man. Punishments were dictated depending on the actions of the woman, indicating how the government began to integrate female chastity into their legislation. Female chastity began to be desired and was more clearly defined after the government introduced two categories of chastity, lie and jie, and began to give out these as awards to laud women who remained chaste under specific circumstances. Lie awards were given to sexually assaulted women who protected their sexual purity through self-mutilation ” or in some extreme cases, suicide ” while jie awards were granted to chaste widows who remained faithful to their deceased husbands. Scholar Siyen Fei asserts that the court regularly placed pressure on local officials to nominate candidates through touring regional inspectors.
This award-based government initiative was actually quite successful, giving women incentive to behave sexually morally under the definitions of the legal codes and especially publicly exemplify their chastity so they could be nominated. Chastity stone arches (known as paifang) were enacted in honor of the successfully chaste; these were visual representations of social norms and reinforced how the government believed maintaining their chastity should be a daily priority for all women. Other awards were also given out for proper behavior, like being a respected scholar or adopting orphans, but gazette archives revealed that editors had recorded an overwhelming majority of female chastity award recipients compared to other awards; clearly, women during this time embraced the notion of being chaste and being honored in their communities for doing so. Some newspapers and gazettes printed during this time also published biographies about women who cut off their noses or drowned themselves in nearby rivers to deter rapists from polluting their chastity. Evidently, being chaste was a public affair. Consequently, as women became more extreme in their moral convictions and desires to safeguard their sexual purity, the rate of female suicide also grew during this time. Of course, it is possible for some widows to have committed suicide due to financial and emotional hardship, but many accounts recorded by Qing dynasty legal secretaries detail stories of women who were defiantly chaste. For example, in a 1739 case, Wu Shi, a widow whose husband died of illness, remained chaste for ten years after. When she was forced to remarry, she hung herself, essentially martyring herself for chastity.
A widow and her in-law's decision to remarry could often be financially motivated; remaining chaste took an economic toll on the family and would only be realistic for widows from wealthy families. Charlotte Furth, when contextualizing Chinese medicine in history, characterized the female body was characterized as a 'sacrificial reproductive body' that fulfilled the duties associated with chastity through its dedication to a specific labor in service of the family. Furth goes on to assert that physical pain was an integral element of physical female virtue. Certainly, this was the case with widow chastity, as some women saw suicide as the only way to remain virtuous after they were forced into remarriage. The act of foot-binding, then, could also be put into this category of physical pain. During the Qing Dynasty, while the chastity movement was at its height, the foot-binding movement was also pervasive; foot-binding had become part of a beauty ideal that women of all social and economic levels coveted. In her book Cinderella's Sisters: A Revisionist History of Footbinding, Dorothy Ko claims that those who had been frequently praised for the beauty of their feet may well have internalized this standard of beauty and been more than willing to help their daughters attain it as well.
The concept of thrice following implied a life of chastity: a girl's life was divided into three sections, where she followed her father before she was married, then her husband, and then her son if she became a widow. Therefore, to prepare for the next stage of their daughters' lives, mothers began footbinding their daughters at a young age, wanting them to attract a good husband; the smaller and more crippled the feet, the more beautiful the woman. Husbands chose wives sometimes solely by looking at their feet, as a woman's capabilities as a good wife could be tied to the size of her feet. Ko mentions a husband who criticized his wife's wastefulness by commenting on her feet, saying that keeping [her] around we would have no jacket and pants to wear; why, a pair of your shoes uses up three feet of cloth. For women, then, their social status and marriageability largely depended on this very superficial and visual aspect of their body. Women scrutinized other women for the way they walked and the size of their feet. Women with ugly feet ” specifically, women with poorly bound feet ” were bullied and called names such as half-squeezed-foot and little-crooked-bone. Notably, women with natural and entirely unbound feet were not snubbed as much as women who tried to bind their feet. Again, this may have been because foot-binding had expanded to lower social levels; women who didn't bind their feet altogether may have been left out of the narrative, while women who were not as successful at foot-binding were seen as posers who wanted to join the elite. Ko asserts that the surface of female bodies - especially the adorned bound foot - acquired significance as 'social skin,' a boundary between self and others as well as between social classes.
By observing a woman's foot, one could superficially lump her in with the group of the elite or with the poor. It is also important to acknowledge that the rise of foot-binding during the Ming and Qing dynasties may not have been a direct result of the rise of chastity - Ko concedes that other factors may have contributed to the movement. Changes in the way that homes and other domestic spaces were constructed resulted in more permanent enclosed areas, furthering the culture of seclusion for women and keeping women in this private sphere. Furthermore, changes in domestic furniture, namely, the growing popularity of chairs and tables would have reduced the pressures on feet and allowed women to sit down more comfortably, with their legs hanging rather than on the ground. However, it would be inexhaustive to not consider the connections between foot-binding and preservation of chastity; the elite class of women who were most successful at foot-binding were also practicing chastity at the highest level. Foot-binding, then, as a very visual and physical indication of class and civility was a way for women to gauge another woman's level of devotion to her sexual morality. Later in the Qing era, critics of the gender norms and sexual inequality included foot-binding in their criticisms. Yuan Mei, a well-known poet and scholar, not only encouraged casual interactions between the sexes but also explicitly condemned the suicides of rape victims, the custom of widow chastity, and even foot-binding as unnecessarily extreme expressions of virtue.
Even if foot-binding was not a direct result of female chastity, scholars from this time viewed foot-binding as a symbol of chastity to some degree. By studying the legal codes as well as analyzing stories of women over time, it is evident that life and expectations for a woman in ancient China was shaped through more complex ways than just her gender. Simply claiming that female agency was restricted during this time would be inaccurate; even the definition of agency for women evolved over time and had distinct significance for women of different classes. The stories and torturous practices that these women endured certainly underscore the oppression of Chinese women for centuries. But when studying the lives of these women, it is just as important for us to fully contextualize them in the economic and social climate of their time and understand the differing class expectations that all contributed to the rise and lauding of female chastity.
Cite this page
Pain and Prostitution: The Evolution of Female Chastity in Ancient and Late Imperial China. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Schizophrenia Research Paper
This paper will focus on many different variables that exist for schizophrenia. In order to educate the readers about this mental disorder, perhaps the best way to start is by defining the symptoms that indicate a person has schizophrenia. People with schizophrenia are delusional which means they can be a bit out of touch with reality (Pec, Bob, Lysaker, 2015). Schizophrenics are unable to have coherent speech at certain times and have difficulty controlling their bodily movements. In some cases, they appear jumbled and irregular in emotions (Pec, Bob, & Lysaker, 2015). The most common symptom are their hallucinations, in which they see people who do not really exist or personify inanimate objects. As one can tell, some of these symptoms are more distinguishable than others. The most telling symptoms are obviously the delusions, incoherent speech, and hallucinations.
History of Schizophrenia
To be able to understand schizophrenia, one must understand how schizophrenia came to fruition. One o the most well-known psychologists who was able to put a name to the illness was Eugen Bleuler (Pec, Bob, & Lysaker, 2015). Before Eugen Blueler, which was during the twentieth century, not much information existed about schizophrenia. Those who were delusional and hallucinated were considered bewitched. They were put into harsh conditions due to their abnormal behaviors. Because schizophrenic people acted out in such adverse ways, talking about such abnormalities were considered taboo. This is where the origination of the negative mindset came from. Since not much of research had been conducted to determine the root cause of schizophrenia, society was unsure how to treat people with abnormalities.
In the twentieth century, Blueler was able to pinpoint certain criteria that he referred to as schizophrenic symptoms (Pec, Bob, & Lysaker, 2015). These symptoms were the hallucinations, delusions, and being out of touch with reality. These symptoms were the most uncommon, and easy to spot for psychologists. Not only did Blueler find different types of symptoms, but he also found several causes that increased the risk factor o having schizophrenia. One of the main causes, he believed, was that of a traumatic childhood experience which would have impacted the child for a lifetime (Pec, Bob, & Lysaker, 2015, p. 59). He was able to correlate other symptoms with schizophrenia as well. The other causes were isolationand neurocognitive abnormalities (Pec, Bob, & Lysaker, 2015, p. 60).
Causes of Schizophrenia
There are a few known causes of schizophrenia that are important to include in this paper. According to some researchers, people who are diagnosed with schizophrenia have elevated homocysteine (hcy) (Misiak, et. al., 2014, p. 661). This is a type of an amino acid, which can basically enable protein in the body. Ironically, there are even more causes that cause this elevation. In a study conducted to determine the cause of schizophrenia, researchers associated heightened levels of homocysteine with family history of schizophrenia, cannabis abuselow vitamin B12age, gender, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, medications (Misiak, et. al., 2014, p. 661). There even is a likelihood that these levels can rise when a person goes untreated for schizophrenia for an extended period of time.
Multiple studies have been conducted to determine the causes of schizophrenia. Despite the overload of discussions and hypotheses that researchers have given, one cause has consistently shown up in many studies. Researchers seem to repeatedly find that there is a greater likelihood of a person being schizophrenic when they have a relative that is also schizophrenic (Misiak, et. al. 2014). When a person is related to someone who is schizophrenic, that does not guarantee that they, too, will be diagnosed with the same condition.
Cite this page
Schizophrenia Research Paper. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Government Spending and Economy of Namibia
- Discussion on Government Spending and its impact on the Economy of Namibia
- Introduction
- Government spending on public goods
- Government spending on capital goods
- Government spending on transfer payments.
- Positive impacts of government spending on the economy
- Negative impacts of government spending on the economy
- Conclusion
- Reference list :
Discussion on Government Spending and its impact on the Economy of Namibia
Introduction
Based on the information found on the internet, government spending in Namibia is averaged to be N$ 1 504.55 from 1980 until 2017, reaching an all-time high of N$ 28 747 in 2017 and record low of N$ 6120 in 1980. Namibian government spending (2018, para.1). Government spending takes several forms. Grant (2000, P. 296) defines government spending as spending by public sector, such as expenditure by the central and local government and any loans or grants to the nation as well as on goods and services. This essay explains the issues of government spending, and its importance to the economy of Namibia.
Government spending on public goods
All governments spend huge amounts of money on different services in their country. That is to say, the Namibian government spends money on services that are a necessity to the Namibian citizens such as education, defence, health care, old age pension and poverty eradication programmes. An example of this is the budget of the money that was allocated by the Minister of Finance Honorable Schlettwein in the speech that he gave recently for 2018 budget speech(2018,para 4). The budget speech contained the money allocations as following: Defence: N$ 6 billion, health and social services: N$6.5 billion, old age pension is increased by N$ 50. 00 per month, poverty eradication and social welfare: N$3.4 billion. These are the current expenditure, that is to say spending of day to day running of public services.
Government spending on capital goods
In addition, the Namibian government also spends on social infrastructure and capital goods. Tarirai (2011, p.2) defined capital goods as goods that are used to produce other goods such as machinery. In Namibia, the backbone of the economy is agriculture, and thus the government tries by all means to uplift and bring this very sector to its fullest potential in order to ensure an adequate supply of food to all citizens. It is for this reason that the Namibian government spends mostly on farming machinery, advanced equipment, and effective farming methods like pest control methods, fertilizing methods, hay making, animal feeding and other obsolete from machinery. That is to say, by spending on capital goods, the Namibian government helps stabilize the economy of the country by contributing towards the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) produced by the country in a year.
Government spending on transfer payments.
The Namibian government also spends intensely on transfer payments. These are payments to pensioners, the unemployed and subsidies to producers. They are designed to provide income or increase the income of vulnerable groups and in the latter case, may also be used to increase the output of particular goods and services. Grant(2000, p.32).In Namibia, the government spends about N$ 3.4 billion annually on transfer payment according to Finance Minister, Calle Schlettwein.
As stated earlier, the Namibian government allocates massive amounts of money on the above mentioned sectors. The government can either overspend, which might have negative impacts on the economy, or contrary to that, spend just adequate amounts which might bring about economic growth, and thus having a positive impact on the economy.
Positive impacts of government spending on the economy
First and foremost, governments benefit the economy at large in various ways; directly or indirectly .To begin with, the Namibian government aids the government farmers with the production process through sponsoring, financing and subsidizing. Through this, they produce at lower costs, production increases and in return the total output produced by Namibia increases, leading to an increased GDP. This, in return, allows for an increase in job opportunities, as more people are required to produce at various farming firms countrywide, as well as selling.
Also, as the government helps the unfortunate citizens and other vulnerable groups, it helps with the equal distribution of income and other resources. This narrows the gap that exists between the poor and the rich. Government spending on health care also enables the Namibian citizens to be healthy and able-bodied enough to drive the Namibian economy to its highest peak of production as well as development. On top of that, due to the fact that the Namibian government spends on the upgrading and the development of our education system, well educated citizens tend to find suitable, well-paying jobs that will, in return, help to decrease the unemployment rate and improve living standards in Namibia.
Negative impacts of government spending on the economy
In some cases, government spending exceeds taxation, which is bad for a country's economy. In most cases, it might lead to a deficit. This has a bad impact on the economy and it might leave the country in debt. Inflation may also occur; which is the rapid increase in the price of the goods due to the exceeding demand to supply. This occurs when government over-subsidizes firms and they overprice their goods because they are in great demand in the market. Overall, government sometimes spends on factors that are not beneficial to the whole country at large, but instead only to certain e-lite groups such as politicians. This has a negative impact on the economy, because more money is spent on the taxes that come in, and therefore a deficit is experienced. When a country experiences a deficit, it tends to suffer from countless problems such as unemployment, inflation and rising interest rates, and thus low investments in the long run.
Conclusion
In a nutshell, as the Namibian government goes about spending on different sectors that help run and develop the country, there are good outcomes as well as bad ones. Spending is necessary in order to bring about development in a country, and thus, the government cannot avoid that. Reckless, excessive and fraudulent spending; however, is very dangerous to any country's economy. It brings about a huge gap that exists between the poor and the rich, doesn't allow for the equal distribution of wealth among all citizens in a country and lastly, hinders development. Transparency and truthfulness are therefore very important virtues that are vital for the survival of any country's economy.
Reference list :
1.Namibia government spending.(2018) retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com./Namibia/governmentspending.
2.Grant,SJ.(2000). Introduction to economics .Singapore .Pearson Education Limited.
3.Budget speech 2018/19 for Namibia.(2018) retrieved from https://www.nbc.na/news/some highlights-namibia20182019.budget.16533
4.Tarirai, N .(2011) .Economics NSSC Excellent for grade 11 and 12.Namibia.Zebra Publishing (pty) Ltd.
Cite this page
Government Spending And Economy Of Namibia. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
A Question of Animal Testing
One day you came across a farm with pigs, cows, sheep, goats, chicken, and other farm animals having a wonderful time on a nice sunny day, but moments later a farmer came across with an axe, a stick, a shotgun, and a knife out of nowhere. He sets up a line for animals to come in and moments later he began hitting, abusing, and torching those poor animals because he's unsatisfied with the animals not producing enough resources for him to make a lot of money out of. This is called animals abuse, animals abuse is when an animal is being neglect or treated cruelty, is the infliction by omission or by commission by humans or suffering or harm upon any non-human.
Luckily, there's people who disagrees with animal abuse and has come up with a situation and that is to make a bill for all animals to have rights and have freedom which is called Animals Bill of Rights. The Animal Bill of Rights is a bill that people who disagree with animal's abuse and wants to protect animals from cruelty and abuse by human's behavior, by passing this bill (Sign the Petition, 1). However, this bill has not yet pass because they're some people who disagree with animals having rights because it will affect our lives. By that decision the bill hasn't yet became a bill, and we need to do something about it. I agree that animals should have the Bill of Rights to be pass and it will provide benefits for animals and for humans too.
The Animals Bill of Right will bring animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, and abuse to an end (Animals Bill of Rights, Article 1). In 2002, Congress moved to amend the AWA to exclude birds, rats, and mice from the Act's protections following successful litigation against the government by the Animal Legal Defense Fund that would have required the Act to be interpreted to include them. Together these 3 species excluded from the Act's protections are estimated to comprise over 90 percent of all used in research (Rats, Mice and Birds Excluded from Animal Welfare Act, 1). This is great to hear because it's unfair for animals like birds, mice, and rats to suffer from pain and other symptom because scientist is doing a lack of care towards those animals by ejected them diseases, infections, viruses, and other things to test out what will happen to them. By supporting Animal Bill of Rights, we can stop animals from being experimenting with subjects that aren't safe for animals nor humans.
The Animal Bill of Rights will give the right of farmed animals to an environment that satisfies their basic physical needs and live free without cruelty and being abuse (Animals Bill of Rights, Article 5). In polling, 94% of Americans agree that animals raised for food deserve to live free from abuse and cruelty. Yet the majority of the nearly 10 billion farm animals raised each year in the U.S. suffer in conditions that consumers would not accept if they could see them. Most of our meat, milk and eggs come from industrial farms where efficiency trumps welfare”and animals are paying the price (Farm Animal Welfare, 1). This tells us that the entire U.S.A population agrees that farm animals need the right to live without cruelty and if people where to see how farmers treat their animals' people won't consider buying their food products. With most of the population agreeing with this, we would agree that animals should have their Bill of Rights to be established and end cruelty for farm animals to have freedom.
Animals will have the benefits of having a healthy diet, protective shelter, and adequate medical care (Animals Bill of Rights, Article 3). Currently, 45 states and the District of Columbia have felony level animal cruelty provision, usually for aggravated cruelty or animal fighting or both. The remaining 5 states treat such crimes as misdemeanors, for example in Louisiana aggravated cruelty leading to death of an animals can lead to a fine $25,000 or imprisonment for a period of 10 years (Animal Bill of Rights, Article 3. Par.1). This shows that all 50 states have penalties for animal cruelty and majority of them can agree that Animals do deserve to have the Bill of Rights established for them. All states agree that animals have rights and if they were to be mistreated like humans and will suffer the consequence depending in what state he/ her is in. Animals deserve respect because they are unharmful animals that do nothing to hurt against humans, so why hurt them.
In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals' rights, it causes pain and suffering to the all animals. Humans can't give reasons for making life better for themselves by torturing, abusing, and executing hundreds and thousands of animals per year just to perform experiments or test products. Animals should be treated with respect and worthy, and not be treated poorly there just like humans they have children to provide food for them, they have the same life experience as humans, and they feel emotional too. After all, humans are just like animals too and that why we need to support Animals Bill of Rights.
Cite this page
A Question Of Animal Testing. (2019, Jun 24).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Gun Violence and Cases of Shooting in Schools
Gun violence, in schools, is a reoccurring tragedy that needs to stop now. Innocent children and teachers have been murdered in their schools for over 178 years. When is it going to end? The Bible is consistently talking about sin and the works of evil and how to give it all to Jesus but there's one question I have for everyone. How can we teach more people about the love of Christ in public schools? Students and teachers should not have to live in fear in the classroom. Change needs to happen now.
The beginning of new school year is a time most students look forward to. A new school year symbolizes a new chapter in life. As well as new friends, responsibilities, and fun. Unfortunately, for some people a new school year can be quite scary and traumatizing. Especially, because of the traumatic occurrences happening within schools all over the United States. In 2017, there was not ten, not twenty, but sixty- five school shootings. As the new school year approaches, parents, guardians, and teachers are being forced to teach their children and students about how to protect themselves from intruders with weapons. The issue has gotten so out of hand, that local stores are now selling bulletproof backpacks. The fact that parents are afraid to send their children to school is outrageous to me and needs to be dealt with. Enough is enough.
According to K12 Academics, the first documented school shooting was on July 26, 1764. Four armed American Indian men walked into a school house, in Pennsylvania, and took the lives of one teacher and around ten children. There was only one survivor from the catastrophe, an innocent child. School shootings have been an issue in America for over two hundred and fifty-four years. Hundreds of thousands of lives have been taken by a person that walked into a school with a loaded gun. Some of the shootings were intentional and some were on accident. Change is not always easy, but it is possible.
Recently, I read a book called Columbine by Dave Cullen. The book is based off the true events of a school shooting that occurred in Littleton, Colorado on April 20, 1999. Dave Cullen is a journalist that arrived at the school shortly after the incident. Throughout the book, he talks about the lives of the shooters, how the evidence was mishandled by authorities, and all the false information that was released in the news. It was clear, Cullen wanted to discover what truly happened leading up to the disastrous day of April 20, 1999. It's easy to tell that he wanted to get down to the bottom of things because others weren't.
In todays society, everyone has an opinion on everything and everyone. One of the biggest debates in the United States is the gun debate. Many people believe that not every person should be able to go to their local store and buy a gun with ammo. On the other hand, other people believe that every person has a right to have a gun whenever and wherever they'd like. Guns should not even be compared to the safety of children and students. Student safety should be the number one priority of all parents. Not guns. Period.
One of the first things you see on social media, after a school shooting, is people saying that their thoughts and prayers are with the families of the victims. According to Kate Shellnutt with Christianity Today, one of the most popular scriptures that people post is, The Lord is close to the brokenhearted and saves those who are crushed in spirit. Psalm 34:18. What does this scripture mean? And why is it such a popular scripture to post? If you break down the scripture, it means that God is with you at your most troubled and heart-breaking times and if you fall he'll be there to catch you. I feel like this scripture is common because behind a phone screen, you can't do much but try to comfort the families of the victims and pray for them. I've had people say to me, you can pray all you want but it's not helping or doing anything. Yes, I agree that more needs to be done, but the power of prayer is so extraordinary and can move mountains. Up and coming generations are hurting and broken and want to feel loved but are seeking it in the wrong areas. More people who are passionate about our youth need to come together and show these kids how great the love of Christ is for them and it could make a huge difference in the violence that we are seeing today.
School violence is not okay and will never be okay. School should be one of the safest places for not only the children, but the faculty. Change is never easy, but it needs to happen. Mental illness is real and should not be an excuse for all the lives that have been lost. Buying a gun should be as hard as buying a car. We need to keep our children safe. They are not only the younger generation, they are world changers.
Cite this page
Gun Violence and Cases of Shooting in Schools. (2019, Jun 23).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Nelson Mandela: Rebel, Warrior, Leader
Nelson Mandela was born on July 18, 1918, into the small tribe of Thembu located at Qunu, South Africa. As the son of Nonqaphi Nosekeni and Henry Mgalda Mandela, a chief councilor of the Thembu tribe, he was initially named as Rolihlahla Dalibhunga Mandela but later changed his name to Nelson Mandela to fit into the society. Nelson Mandela achieved many things in his lifetime. One of his major achievements was his win against the unjust government in South Africa. He was able to get his people to be able to vote and that was never allowed, they were given rights and the British never thought they deserved them. Another achievement was when he ran for president and won. He was the first black president in South Africa. He ended up winning the Noel peace prize which is one of the greatest award one can ever get.
Nelson Mandela was the leader of South Africa because he accomplished what many could not. He ended apartheid laws, unified two racial groups and created justice for his people. Mandela's actions also affected the rest of the world. Through his actions, he let the world see that equality is possible. In 1993, Mandela won the Nobel Peace Prize for the impact he made on the world. In 2009, The United Nations General Assembly declared Mandela's birthday as 'Mandela Day', as an effort to pay tribute and homage to his great work in the anti-apartheid movement. Mandela was recognized for 260 awards during his lifetime of dedication to what he believed in and most importantly his contributions to society. One great quote that Nelson Mandela illustrated was, After one has been in prison, it is the small things that one appreciates: being able to take a walk whenever one wants, going into a shop and buying a newspaper, speaking or choosing to remain silent.
The simple act of being able to control one's person. firstly I think this is a great quote because people today don't appreciate what they have and take everything for granted. The meaning of this quote is expressing freedom and how we should appreciate it more due to the fact that some don't even have rights. Secondly, this quote sums up what Nelson Mandela has been fighting for throughout his legacy to guide society as a whole to accept one another for any racial reasons. thirdly, Nelson Mandela wrote this quote off experience, considering he served 27 years in 1962 for conspiring to overthrow the state following the Rivonia Trial. Nelson Mandela is a name that cannot be pronounced without mentioning the apartheid. At least, without thinking about it. Since the beginning of this fight, he has been the symbol of a generation who wanted and who needed a change in its own country.
Cite this page
Nelson Mandela: Rebel, Warrior, Leader. (2019, Jun 23).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Was the Atomic Bomb a Solution?
Without the atomic bomb, Japan would have won and completely destroyed the United States during World War II. The world as we know it today would cease to exist, and would be unquestionably much different. Americans created the atomic bomb with the intention to destroy; choosing not to use it would have been a waste of both time and resources. Months of hard work and dedication were put into making the device. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was instrumental for the United States in ending the war, bringing peace, and saving the United States reputation.
Without the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima the war would have proceeded for many more months or even years. From the beginning of the war, it was clearly going to be a difficult one defensively. The Japanese were relentless, and incredibly clever with their war tactics. On December 7, 1941 the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and this caused the United States to enter into World War II. Shortly after the U.S attacked Okinawa in hope of being able to obtain all of Japan. The Japanese neglected to show any sign of stopping even after Americans nonstop bombing them at Okinawa (Greiner). This shows the Japanese determined outlook on the war. The military in Japan was opposed to anyone even mentioning surrendering.
Those who proposed it would often have been imprisoned for their way of thinking. President Harry S. Truman at the time of the attacks knew something had to be done, and knew to respond with appropriate behavior. He states When dealing with a beast, you must treat him like a beast (Greiner). Truman knew that actions had to be taken seeing that the Japanese were not giving up anytime soon. Soon after Okinawa the Japanese began to use Kamikaze pilots. These were men who flew their planes out, and knew they weren't coming back. They would dive from the sky straight into U.S ships causing incredible damage, and in some cases completely destroying the ships (Ending the War Against the Japanese). Seeing that men were giving their lives up to win this war shows that Japan wouldn't stop until they themselves were stopped.
With the dropping of the atomic bomb came an end to a war, and the surrender of feuding countries. The bomb introduced atomic power into military tactics. At the time few scientists knew the effects or were unsure of what may happen making it an even bigger threat. Countries were afraid of how many more there were, and if they were next. This instilled fear in them, and left them wondering. The only way they could ensure safety from being bombed was to surrender. For those claiming innocent lives were being harmed, the U.S sent out the Potsdam Declaration; a document warning the Japanese of what was to come if they didn't surrender (Ending the War Against Japan). Peace was offered with just a threat of what the bomb could do, but the Japanese refused and allowed for themselves to be bombed. After the dropping of the bomb Japanese and American people had very different reactions. The Americans celebrated and were filled with the feeling of relief, because they knew that soon enough their loved ones would be returning from war (Burns).
The Americans were overjoyed and had large parades and extravagant parties to welcome home their beloved soldiers. Overseas though the Japanese were left in a much different state. They were dazed and confused by the bombing, and by the devastation they had just faced (Burns). Their reactions to the war were different, but without it they would still be wondering when it would end. The bomb brought an abrupt end to the war, but it still brought peace or a time of calm between warring countries.
Despite the bomb killing hundreds of thousands it ultimately saved lives and the United States' reputation. Thousands died in battle every day, and when battles were fought nonstop those thousands add up (Greiner). Those thousands were men who were either drafted or volunteered to risk their lives for the U.S. If fighting had continued at the rate it was going millions more would have died for both the Japanese and Americans. The war could have continued on for an unknown amount of time. Ending the war with the atomic bomb saved lives, and ended a countries suffering period. Robert McNamara fought as a war pilot during World War II and was also the United States Secretary of Defense for a period of time. He believes that if we didn't do what we had to the U.S would have been destroyed (The Fog of War).
Someone who fought in the action believed that the U.S had to do what they did to stay afloat and relevant as a country. He saw the deaths, explosions, and pain of those dying and knew that to end that they needed to come back at Japan and assert America's dominance after the bombings at Pearl Harbor. If the United States hadn't won they would be viewed completely differently. If the war had ended on any other terms the U.S would be seen as war criminals for all those they had killed (The Fog of War). War criminals are ones who mistreat their prisoners of war or civilians. So because of their victory their neglect and abuse on Japanese prisoners was overlooked (The Fog of War). United States winning saved their reputation, and saved them from looking immoral to other countries and their own people.
Ending the war, bringing peace, and saving lives and reputations is what the dropping of the atomic bomb did. Without the dropping of the bombs the United States would be viewed differently, and be in a completely different state of economic power and status. The bombings made America a weapon of war. Few knew the other powers in their grasp, and were frightened by the unknown. The bombs showed America's relentless side, and called for a new reign of power.
Cite this page
Was The Atomic Bomb A Solution?. (2019, Jun 23).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Research Paper Georgia State Juvenile Justice System
The juvenile justice system was first established in the United States in 1899, and spread from state to state shortly after. Georgia established its own system to try minors in court in 1906, and the first court was built in 1911 in Fulton County. Every single county in the state of Georgia now has a juvenile court and the courts are all controlled by a 1971 law known as the juvenile code. This code aims to make the courts to be protective of individual minors rather than aim for a harsh punishment. Many believe this is the way to treat minors, but many people believe that the juveniles courts are too soft on delinquents. These same people believe that delinquents should be tried in adult courts. Others argue that children are clearly not adults and that some kids go through a phase of rebellion which simply takes some correcting. In regards to those that believe delinquents should be tried as adults, there actually are instances when the state supreme court can take jurisdiction of the case if the minor is alleged to have committed certain offenses. For example some offenses are crimes that include murder, voluntary manslaughter, and rape. The exception applies when the child is under the age of 13 because these minors are considered to be unable to commit a crime with intent. In other words, the case would go straight to juvenile court if the capital offender is under the age of 13. There are two types of acts that juvenile courts can try minors over. One type is called a delinquent act which is an act that would considered a crime if the individual were to be an adult. The other is a status offense which would not classify as a crime in an adult court.
An example of a status offense would be running away from home. Arrests works differently in the juvenile system compared to the adult court system. For example, if a 15 year old commits a crime and is caught, he or she is considered to be taken into custody rather than arrested. This allows the minor to legally claim that he or she has never been arrested before. Very much like adults, juveniles are granted the same rights such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The juvenile system actually takes a lot of factors into account when a minor inadvertently confesses to a crime. Courts consider whether the minor truly understood his or her rights at the time. If an officer is able to get a minor to confess, and the method of interrogation used might be considered. Another factor considered is the whether or not there was an adult present to consult with the minor. If a juvenile is wrongfully interrogated, the juvenile system actually works in favor of the minor. Before 1960, minors in the United States were not given the right to an attorney. The case that changed this was the Gault Case U.S. 1 (1967). This case involved a fifteen year old, Gerald Gault, who was taken into custody for an obscene phone call he made to the next door neighbor. Gault's parents were not notified that their son was taken into custody, and they were not told the nature of the offense. The problem ensued when Gault was found guilty with no lawyers present in his defense. Because Gault was only a fifteen year old child and ordered to attend reform school until the age of 21, the unserd case was appealed, and the United States Supreme Court held that juveniles in danger of losing their liberty have several rights (JJS). The process of bringing a minor into the juvenile justice system has a couple of key steps.
The first step of the process is called intake, and this is when the youth is turned over to an intake officer of the juvenile court (JJS). The intake officer then has two important decisions to make before the next step. The first of these decisions is whether or not there is is sufficient amount of evidence to back up the charges. The next decision is whether the youth needs to be detained for his or her own safety. There are various reasons as to why a minors would be detained, and the main reason is to prevent them from running away. When parents do not want their child at home or are clearly unfit to care for their child, the officer would order the child to be detained. Where the minor stays during the detention period depends on if it was a delinquent act or a status offense. Alleged delinquents are sent to the state's Regional Youth Detention Centers, and status offenders are sent to shelter-care facilities where non delinquents can stay until arrangements are made (JJS). This paper is going to take a deeper dive into the three main types of cases that go through the juvenile justice system; dependency cases, delinquency cases, and status offense cases are the three main topics that will be discussed. When a child is found in an environment in which they are being abused, neglected, or faced with any form of mistreatment while in the care of their own parents, they can eventually find themselves in the juvenile dependency system. Across the United States there are millions of reports of child maltreatment and many of these cases are not investigated deeply due to insufficient evidence; however, about 58% of the cases reported are left for further investigation (Cleveland).
Around three quarters of the cases that are presented involve neglect, while a smaller number involve physical or sexual abuse, which make up about a quarter of all cases reported (Cleveland). After investigating these cases some families may be given in-home services from the Child Protective Services. If, after investigating, it is to be believed that the child's safety and wellbeing seems to be at risk, the Child Protective Services will submit a petition to refer the child to the juvenile dependency system. After a dependency case has been filed, the child is removed from their home and placed in an out-of-house temporary placement. If an alleged dependent child is not returned to their home after being removed, an initial hearing, known as a preliminary protective hearing, is held within 72 hours after the dependent child is placed into foster care (2017 Georgia Code). During this hearing there are several participants which include: the dependents legal guardians and their attorney (or attorneys), the child's Guardian Ad Litem (if one has been appointed), and the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS) case worker and their attorney. The determination during this hearing includes whether or not there is reason to believe the child is a dependent child and if protective custody is needed so that abuse or neglect are not further experienced. If these are not found, then the child is placed back into the custody of their parents or legal guardians and the case is dismissed. If these are found, then the child may be placed in DFCS temporary custody pending the hearing on the dependency petition.
Following this, the case will then lead into an adjudicatory hearing which is the fact finding and evidence phase of juvenile dependency cases. The Adjuratory phase can happen the same day as the disposition phase in some cases and may be done in one hearing. Between the Adjudicatory hearing and the disposition, the dependency ruling is determined on whether or not the child needs to be put into care or returned back to their parents. From this, the decision is made on what the case plan is for the child, which could include being giving custody to the parents, relative, 3rd party or DFCS, working towards reunification, or to caring on with a case plan involving non-reunification. Following the plans for reunification or non-reunification are in-court reviews, periodic reviews, and permanency plan hearings as well as the determination of the need of Termination of Parental Rights (Brownley). In the state of Georgia each dependent child that enters the court for a juvenile dependency hearing is given a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) who will represent the child in court as stated in the GA Code ?§ 15-11-104 (2017 Georgia Code). The job for the GAL is to represent the child's desires and to advocate for the child's best interest. If for any reason there is a conflict of interest between the GAL and the dependent child, the GAL will then step down and serve only as the child's attorney and a new GAL will be appointed to represent the child. In some cases, a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) will be appointed in sub for Guardian Ad Litem, and for some cases a CASA will be appointed to serve alongside an attorney that is serving as the GAL.
For the most part, GALs conduct interviews with the parents and children, make sure the right services are provided by looking over cases, and making recommendations to the court that ultimately influence and dictate what is talked about and decided in the courtroom. Depending on whether or not the dependency case is a state or private filed case, the GAL will either have to go out and research on their own or work with a case worker from DFCS. In both situations there are complications and challenges. It is expected of the caseworker to interview family members, friends, teachers, and anyone involved in the child's life to get an understanding of the child's situation. It is up to the case worker to decide on whether or not the home of the child is in is fit to stay in. The overall goal of the caseworker is the child's safety, permanency, and well-being (Phillips). For the GAL, they try to accomplish what's in the best interest of the child, and sometimes that can clash with what the caseworker feels is what's best for the child. What makes matters even more complicated are that CAPTA (1974) fails to elaborate best interests of the child (Phillips), and, because of this, in some cases the case worker and GAL's relationship can complicate cases. Not only does this happen, but what also complicates things are the constant changes of case workers for a child and that not all the case workers are of the same quality. As stated by Derek Brownley, Social work is tough work, their pay is low and many of the good ones get over worked and burnt out (Brownley). For private cases the GAL must act as both the attorney and the case worker having to do all the duties of the case worker on their own, in the harder cases this is where a CASA will be assigned as well to help alleviate some of the workload.
Juvenile delinquency cases involve minors who have allegedly committed crimes. This is to say that if the minor had been an adult the case would have been tried in a regular criminal court. It is important to note the the procedures of juvenile court are vastly different from that of adult criminal court. All states have specialized court systems specific for juveniles who are accused of committing offense that violate the law. Ultimately juveniles are found to be either not guilt or delinquent of the law a much different determination than in adult criminal court.In the same fashion as adult criminal court proceedings, juvenile court proceedings include participants such as police officers, prosecutors, and judges. Procedures for juvenile delinquency cases vary from state to state; however, the process of a typical juvenile delinquency case is typical in nature. The first contact, usually, with the minor is a police officer or law enforcement official. According to Officer Guiden, a law enforcement officer for the city of Atlanta, who post at the Georgia State campus, police officers may decide to deal with juveniles in a number of ways when alleged to have violated a criminal statute. Although Georgia state University, is attended primarily by legal adults, in some of his encounters and arrets Officer Guiden has had to respond to cases involving students who are minors. He recounts that in some instances a warning is all that was called for in his discretionary opinion. When a warning is issued the minor is informed of their offense, counseled to make sure there is an understanding on abstaining from committing the same violation in the future for their best benefit, and released. This is often referred to as the counseled and released alternative. Second the officer can choose to hold the minor until a custodial agent comes. Police officers have the authority to detain the minor, issue a warning, and then release the minor to a custodial guardian. Third the officer, if deemed necessary and at the officer's discretion, may refer the minor to juvenile court.
This involves placing the minor in custody, not arrest, and referring the case to the juvenile court system. At this point a prosecutor or intake officer, often a probation officer, initiates either a dismissal of the case, an informal resolution, or formal charges are filed. The latter process is defined as petitioning the case. According to Mrs. Guiden, a probation officer with the fulton county juvenile system, intake officers typically consider several key factors including: severity of the offense, the juveniles age, past record, strength of the evidence in the case, the juvenile's gender, social history, and most importantly the ability of the minors parents to control his or her behavior. On average 20% of cases are dismissed, 25% are handled informally, and 55% go through formal court proceedings. Informal proceedings still require a court appearance. Typically the minor must appear before a probation officer and/or judge. No formal charges are brought there is usually an informal response or request of the court, such as: a stern lecture, attend counseling, attend after-school classes, repay the victim for damages, pay a fine, community service work, or probation. It is at this time if abuse or neglect is suspected the juvenile courts may initiate removal proceedings from the legal guardian. Formal proceedings or petitioning the court, like adult criminal cases does include an arraignment. This is also known as formal charges are brought forth against the minor. In some instances the minor may be sent to appear in adult criminal court. After arraignment the courts decide whether to detain or release.
Majority of the time the minor is released during the hearing process. The next step involve one of three outcomes: the minor enters a plea agreement, the judge diverts the case, or the judge holds an adjudicatory hearing. Diversion includes the court maintaining jurisdiction over the case while the minor is allowed to complete a recommendation program such as counseling or community service and non completing could include the reinstatement of formal charges. The adjudicatory hearing is much like an adult criminal hearing in which both sides present their case and evidence in a trial. The judge will make a determination as to whether or not the minor is delinquent. Instead of being found guilty, as such is the case in an adult criminal case, the courts sustain the petition. This is followed by the probation office evaluating the minor, ordering a psychological examination or diagnostic tests if necessary, and then make recommendations at the disposition hearing (which is similar to a sentencing hearing in criminal court). The judge then decides what is in the best interest of the juvenile, and may order any number of things as part of the disposition, including: counseling, confinement in a juvenile detention facility, reimbursement of the victim, or probation. The judge may also order the juvenile to appear in court periodically (called post-disposition hearings) so that the judge can monitor the juvenile's behavior and progress. One of the less severe cases in the juvenile system is the status offense.
This is an offense that would not classify as a crime in the adult court system. The idea behind a status offense is that the specific activity is harmful to minors, and the government should do what they can to prevent minors to do things such as purchase cigarettes. Other examples of some status offenses are truancy and possession and consumption of alcohol. Before the 1960s and 1970s, status offense cases were brought into the juvenile justice system, but now they are diverted to agencies outside the juvenile court's jurisdiction (FindLaw). This change came about thanks to the 1974 Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act which essentially deinstitutionalized status offenses (FindLaw). This change was introduced because a handful of people believe that status offenses are minor, and these same people believe that juveniles are best off dealing with the situation with either their parents or an agency rather than being processed like adults through the justice system. The juvenile system is comprised of many complexities that vastly different from the adult criminal courts. The main focus of the juvenile system is to rehabilitate and support, were as in the adult criminal courts it is accountability first and rehabilitation (if possible) second. Juveniles are seen as individuals who are still in the development stage of life and need guidance, counsel, and support. Courts do not minimize the need for discipline or punishment but focus on growth. In each stage the courts recognize an aim to nurture and consider the best interest of the minor first.
Cite this page
Research Paper Georgia State Juvenile Justice System. (2019, Jun 22).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Christianity and Ancient Egyptian Mythology
Religion has always been a strange but brightening subject of surprises and discussion, especially when comparing and contrast two different faiths. The path down that road is a rough one ahead with many twists and turns. From rituals to the concept of souls, Christianity and Ancient Egyptian Mythology can seem quite different, but these two faiths are actually rather close. Wep Ronpet to New Year's Day, it can all seem as though it is being repeated. The cultures may be extremely different, but the faith is not. Prayer is a large part of any religion. In Christianity, prayer can either be private or as a community, depending on preference and can be done by yourself or by a priest. Many religious is a good mix of private and community prayer, instead of one or the other. Many formal things must be done by a priest including most Baptisms, Communion, and the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Christians have a similar ritual to the cleansing bath of the Ancient Egyptians but it is usually a once in a life time thing that can be for any person, not just a member of clergy.
Baptism, which can be done at any age, is a ritual that many Christians consider important for a relationship with God to be healthy. A priest can either use the immersion tradition, which submerges the person under water fully, or they can pour holy water on top of the person's head. Baptism is seen as a way to get right with God, even though this contradicts the New Testament which says work is not needed to gain salvation. The symbolism of baptism is quite clear. When a person gets immersed in the water, they are showing the picture of Christ dying but when they immerge, it is said that they are rising with Him. It is shown as a picture of rebirth that marks an outward sign of an inward change. As much of a tradition it is, many believe baptism is overemphasized and not needed for salvation. Communion, or the Eucharist, is considered one of the most sacred rituals in Christianity. It is seen as a remembrance and celebration to Jesus Christ. The ritual itself is simple but rather important to most Christians throughout the world. The bread and wine are thought of as the body and blood of Christ. The presence of Christ is made spiritually real in and through them, because they are unchanged elements that are used as symbols in communion. In Christianity, sin is prevalent theme in the faith that can be offset somewhat by Sacrament of Reconciliation, or Confession.
Confession is a ritual that helps people cope with sin and also gain guidance and advice in their time of need. Christian scholars say that human nature is weakened by the Original Sin. This inclination to evil is the consequence of this weakness. For Egyptian Mythology, not many records show as to how the commoners worshipped, but there are many good guesses as to what they did and their involvement in their religion. Temples were not open for commoners, because of their impurity, but the priests would hold small rituals outside for the general public. Some communities even had local temples made of mud bricks with a chosen priest or priestess to serve the deity. Temples also had offering boxes so people could offer gifts in return for protection and favors. Priests and priestesses in Ancient Egypt had daily rites that had to be done and what they had to do depended on their gender and their hierarchical status. Regardless of gender or status, all priests and priestesses had set taboos and traditions dictating what they could or could not do. These taboos did not allow the eating of fish, as it was seen as a peasant's food, or the wearing of wool, as all animal products were unclean. All priests and priestesses had to have all body hair shaved off, mainly for cleanliness (Pinch 2002). Bathing in a sacred, or blessed, lake was an essential tri-daily ritual for priests of many beliefs, especially for the Ancient Egyptians.
Only priests were able to gain access to the lake, or oasis, so the water would stay pure for them to bath before prayer or meditation. It was meant to cleanse any impurity from the priest to get them ready to present offerings to the Gods. Ancient Egyptian priests held an ascetic life that was controlled to what foods they could eat, sexual contact, clothing, and even bathing (David 2002). As alike Christianity and Ancient Egyptian Mythology are in rituals and worships, their holidays are almost completely different from each other. For example, Christians celebrate Easter Sunday as the resurrection of Jesus Christ, three days after his death on the cross. The actual crucifixion is commemorated on Good Friday, the Friday just before Easter. Jesus paid the penalty for sin, which granted everyone who believed in him eternal life. Easter marks the end of Lent, a 40-day fasting period that prepares one for Easter. Easter was actually of pagan origins so it is now thought of as the Resurrection Day among many Christian churches. Christmas is thought of as the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ by the Virgin Mary, on December the 25th. Modern people celebrate Christmas with traditional symbols like the Christmas tree and Santa Claus. Though, like Easter, Christmas owes its origin to pagan celebration but was appropriated by Christians as a way to win more souls.
Christmas trees are an example of that, as it is sometimes explained as a pagan ritual during the Winter Solstice which used evergreen boughs in pagan tree worship. Santa Claus, or Saint Nicholas, is the popular image of Christmas now that symbolizes the giving of gifts among family and friends (Hinnells 1997). Wep Ronpet, or Upet Ronpet, means Opening of the Year in the Ancient Egyptian language. It is the equivalent of New Year's Day and was celebrated as a national religious holiday in Egypt in that time. The flooding of the Nile and the Dog Star, Sirius, rising about the horizon before dawn marked the New Year for the Ancient Egyptians. Wep Ronpet is regarded as Ra's birthday, the main Sun God. The flooding of the Nile was often thought to be caused by the tears of Isis who wept for Osiris, her murdered husband. Another tradition involved the Vengeance of Sakhmet. The Vengeance of Sakhmet is known by the Book of the Divine Cow, a sacred text hidden in the tombs of pharaohs. According to legend, Ra, when ruling on Earth, found that some human plotted against him so he sent Sakhmet to punish the humans. She slaughtered the rebels, but continued he killing and threatened to wipe out humanity. The other Gods filled a hole with red colored beer so she would mistake it as blood. Once she drank it, she went unconscious and humankind was saved.
To commemorate the myth, Egyptians would drink red beer during Wep Ronpet. The Festival of Sokar is an ancient celebration that rivaled even that of Opet. The celebration took place in the fourth month of the Egyptian civil calendar and lasted for six days during the interval of days 25 through 30. The festival grew to be even longer because of its importance dealing with the God of the Underworld, Osiris and his link to the archaic powers of Memphis, which was the ancient capital of Egypt that united both Lower and Upper Egypt. With all of the history we have on Ancient Egypt, it is known that Sokar predated the unification of Egypt and Egyptian history itself. The festival of Sokar was a somber celebration and was associated with Osiris, who was dead by the central day of the festival (David 2002). Most religions teach that there is some form of life after death. In Christianity, the soul is a part of a person that goes to heaven or hell after death. In that belief, the soul is a piece of a human that is immortal and conscious. Most scholars believe that the immortality of a soul was brought up by Greek philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle because of their theories of the soul. Socrates explained that the immortal soul is rewarded for good deed or punished for evil deeds, which pre-dates any Christian ideologies.
The Ancient Egyptians believed that a human soul was made of five parts: the Ren, the Ba, the Ka, the Sheut, and the Ib. The Ib, or heart, was one of the most important parts of a soul because it was believed to be the seat of emotion, thought, will, and intention. The Ib was the key to the Afterlife, because it was weighed with a feather of Ma'at to decide the person's fate. The Sheut, or Shadow, was always present from the belief that a person could not exist without a shadow. The Ren, or Name, was the part of soul given to the person at birth and they believed that it would live as long as that name was spoken, which is why cartouches of royals were made. The Ba was everything that made an individual unique, like a person's personality. The Ka was the part of the soul that held the vital essence that tells the differences of a living and dead person. The Ancient Egyptians believed the Ka was the part of the human that need sustenance. Mummification was developed to preserve the body so that the Ka and Ba could come back to a body and rejuvenate energy to go back into the Afterlife (Pinch 2002). Even though these religions seem very different, there are still a large number of similarities that can be found. From holidays to rituals, the surprising truth is that they are more similar than different. The culture differences between the Christians and Egyptians are what make the difference between the holidays, rituals, or concept of the soul, not their religion.
Cite this page
Christianity And Ancient Egyptian Mythology. (2019, Jun 22).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
The Great Gatsby and Prohibition
The 1920s in America was an era of excess, a time when the free market thrived and could be afforded. Even products that were declared illegal could be bought from the underground. One product in particular was alcohol, a product restricted by prohibition. Prohibition stated that the production, distribution, and purchase of alcohol was illegal (Kelly). This policy had been built up by a variety of organizations across the nation, looking to dry America. By the 1920s, their efforts brought into effect the 18th amendment, which states that one year after its ratification, the manufacture, sale, transportation, importation and exportation of intoxicating liquors was declared illegal (Constitute: Amendment XVII). This amendment would launch America into the era of Prohibition, and all the consequences that came with it.
Realizing the popular, and sometimes desperate, demand for alcohol, despite its recently stated illegality, the American mafia groups began intricate bootlegging operations and profited immensely, gaining wealth and power. This devious and opportunistic criminal activity and other issues caused by prohibition, would cause the government to later reject its previous decision and repeal prohibition. In his novel, The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald uses prohibition and its byproducts as part of his societal tapestry, showing its effects and influence on his characters.
In the time of The Great Gatsby, the 1920s, people were living in excess. Despite this, prohibition was in full effect, since the implementation of the 18th Amendment on January 7, 1920 (Burns, Novick). The American brewing companies struggled to stay afloat with this law in place, and many of them largely disappeared. (""Pennsylvania Ave Pilsner and a Rochester beer legacy."") ""After Prohibition, there were only four that came back(""Pennsylvania Ave Pilsner and a Rochester beer legacy.""). The law and its effects were largely ignored and disregarded by most average people, privately owning alcohol, as well as doing their drinking at speakeasies, secret buildings that were equivalent to a bar(Taylor, Kazmers). One such speakeasy was attended by Nick Carraway and Jay Gatsby when they were having lunch with Gatsby's business partner, Wolfshiem (Fitzgerald). This ignorance of and disregard for the law was rarely punished, as the US government at the time was not as powerful as it is today, allowing much personal freedom.
One of these personal freedoms was women's ability to vote, through the implementation of the 19th amendment to the US constitution. This and other new freedoms for women gave rise to flappers, expressive and rebellious women of the 20s whose likenesses were captured and preserved in several photos from the era. These young woman had their own careers, their own interests and personalities, and worked to satisfy themselves. These new women were the antithesis to the subservient women who came before them. Women participated in the rebellion against prohibition as well, joining their male counterparts in speakeasies in addition to participating in other alcoholic activities. According to the Flappers article on ushistory.org, more young women consumed alcohol in the decade it was illegal than ever before. Prohibition gave many people a chance to rebel and demonstrate personal freedom through disobedience, as well as giving shady individuals and groups a chance at profit.
The origins of prohibition stretch back to the 1800s when the habit of excess drinking and alcohol driven abuse was common and a serious problem. According to Ken Burn's and Lynn Novick's The Roots of Prohibition, By 1830, the average American over 15 years old consumed nearly seven gallons of pure alcohol a year. To combat this, people like affected women, religious leaders, and popular societal figures founded anti alcohol groups such as the Christian Women's Temperance Movement and the Anti-Saloon league (Burns, Novick). Some of these temperance supporters were former abolitionists who fought against slavery and later came to see drink as an equally great evil to be eradicated(Burns, Novick). These groups lobbied, educated, protested, and allied themselves with other political and activist groups until they gained the influence they needed. The activities of these groups would cause problems and conflict in places were brewing was popular, hurting reputations and economies (""Pennsylvania Ave Pilsner and a Rochester beer legacy.""). Soon, a proposal was passed to the US government to delegate on. According to Repeal of Prohibition, By January 1919 three quarters of the states had ratified this proposal, and it became effective on 16 January 1920. The temperance groups had succeeded in drying America with the 18th amendment. This would start the well known and resented prohibition, however, this law really wouldn't stop the production, transportation, distribution, sale, or consumption of alcohol at all (Bootleggers and Bathtub Gin.). At this point, even with good intentions, the biggest mistake of the 1920s would be made.
With Prohibition in effect, crime lords like Al Capone saw an opportunity at profit and the consolidation of power. Capone had a brilliant criminal mind, and he focused it on organizing an international bootlegging ring(Taylor, Kazmers). Using their gangs, they began setting up their bootlegging operations, secretly transporting and selling illegal alcohol across the nation and beyond. They would also set up secret bars known as speakeasies to sell their bootlegged products and provide a safe haven for drinkers (Taylor, Kazmers). These speakeasies were hidden and heavily guarded by the gang's enforcers to ensure that their business wasn't threatened. Through their bootlegging and speakeasies, organised crime across America gained much wealth and power. Sometimes, they would use this to gain even more through a method known as racketeering.
Racketeering was, in a basic definition, the forcible infiltration of a business to gain control over its funds and products. Some mafia would do it by disguising themselves as workers' union members, other would do through sheer deadly force, or a variety of other methods. A gang would racketeer legitimate businesses and even their criminal rivals to amass their influence and wealth. (Taylor, Kazmers) To add to the talk of influence, crime lords like Capone would also successfully bribe and divert law enforcement, allowing their gangs to continue their operations unhindered and without fear of legal punishment, ensuring and preserving profit. This power and influence allowed organized crime syndicates to have a hand in other criminal enterprises, many of them already a part of their bootlegging operations (Parkinson). With all of this, these crime syndicates now had a near monopolistic control over the production, transportation, distribution, and sale of alcohol in America. In The Great Gatsby, it was revealed that Gatsby was a bootlegger, working for the gangster Mayer Wolfshiem. Through this less than legal activity, Gatsby gained the extreme wealth and mystery he was famous for (Fitzgerald 133-134). Also, Gatsby had a positive reputation with the New York police commissioner, most likely through secret deals and bribery. He uses this reputation to avoid punishment, such as when he avoids getting pulled over when he and Nick were driving to lunch (Fitzgerald 68). Organized crime was a very significant and memorable aspect of 1920s America, as well as a reminder and a warning to those who wanted to implement policies banning popular goods.
Increasingly, professionally brewed alcohol wasn't the only drink sold in these speakeasies. Gangs would also sell a kind of do-it-yourself alcohol, nicknamed Bathtub gin. One such instance of the creation and selling of bathtub gin is when the Genna brothers' gang gave local poor families special home brewing stills to make drinks (Bootleggers and Bathtub Gin.). The families would connect these stills to their bathtub spigots, hence its name, and would create the strange drink. This was mainly due to the fact that their bottles often were too tall to fit under the spigot in the kitchen sink(Bootleggers and Bathtub Gin.) The gang would afterward buy these drinks to sell in speakeasies. According to Bootleggers and Bathtub Gin, few could tolerate the bad taste of this bathtub gin. Bartenders in speakeasies blended ounces of it with various mixers from bitters to soda pop, juices and fruit garnishes, to hide the flavor of the poorly made alcohol. Nevertheless, this method of making alcohol became popular and would spread across the nation. For example, the infamous career of moonshining became further intrenched and become well known in the south around this time. However, while popular and more insidious, the practice of making Bathtub gin was not always safe for the consumer. As previously stated, sometimes the mafia would racketeer businesses (Taylor, Kazmers), however, this was not always for money or power. At this time, some gangs, seeking control over alcohol production, would racketeer businesses for ingredients to be used for bathtub gin (Bootleggers and Bathtub Gin.). In one instance, a gang gained control of a large amount of industrial grain alcohol, using it to make a toxic, and sometimes deadly, breed of bathtub gin that made purchasing bootlegged alcohol a major risk. Industrial alcohol had additional toxic additives place there by regulation in hope of dissuading a thirsty public from consuming it. It didn't work. Bathtub gin would be one of the reasons for prohibition's later repeal. (The Poisoner's Handbook) In conclusion, people would try to make alcohol to save money, time, and to try to avoid trouble with law enforcement. However, these drinks were not the safest to consume and became a risk.
The efforts made to enforce and preserve prohibition were failing, people were secretly purchasing alcohol, the mafia was selling it and providing places to drink, and some people were making their own, often poisonous, alcohol. Stopping many of these issues was extremely difficult, for example, the mafia's leaders would bribe law enforcement into avoiding them and refraining from investigation, allowing the gangs to exist and expand unhindered (Taylor, Kazmers). Also, despite the selling and purchasing of alcohol's illegality in America, there were those who were able to get around this restriction by buying it from other places. According to Repeal of Prohibition, Liquor dealers in Canada, the Caribbean, and Europe provided a ready and unimpeded source of alcoholic beverages, and there were many who were prepared to risk arrest to take advantage of the opportunities afforded. These workarounds and a general disregard for the law wasn't helping support for prohibition. It also wasn't helped by the fact that the mafia now possessed immense power, wealth, and influence from their bootlegging business (Taylor, Kazmers). Neither was the fact that tainted homemade alcohol was being brewed, sickening and even killing those who consumed it (Bootleggers and Bathtub Gin). Something had to be done to gain control of this situation.
The woman appointed to handle cases regarding the enforcement and disobedience of prohibition, Mabel Walker Willebrandt, found a lack of commitment as well as corruption on the part of some of her colleagues, as well as that she lacked authority to deal with the enforcement and violations of the 18th amendment. (The Repeal of Prohibition) According to The Repeal of Prohibition, sixty-nine hundred arrests had been made during one three-year period, but only twenty convictions had been obtained. Willebrandt, had also found that US attorneys from around the country were not committed to enforcing the law, only adding to prohibition's failures. Forced to deal with these and other difficulties, Willebrant gave up, leaving the corrupt and uncommitted around her to figure out the problem for themselves.
Things would soon change after the Stock Market Crash occurred and The Great Depression set in. Prohibition would become unpopular. The common opinion, according to The Repeal of Prohibition, was that Prohibition simply no longer fit the American lifestyle. The Democratic Party would soon take interest in this new revelation, and use it to their advantage. They added the repealing of prohibition to its election platform, and gained popular support. This would all soon come to a head when the 21st amendment was passed on December 5, 1933, bringing an end to prohibition.
Even after prohibition's repeal in 1933, many of its consequences exist and thrive today. One such consequence is that prohibition did somewhat work as intended. According to Ten Legacies of Prohibition, the pre prohibition era average American consumed about 2.6 gallons of alcohol per year, while the post prohibition era average American consumed about 2.2 gallons. So people actually drank less during and after prohibition. This abstinence from drinking, could possibly be caused by the fact that it is harder to find drinks now than during the prohibition era. According again to Ten Legacies of Prohibition, the United States government has passed a variety of laws, 18 to be exact, that direct and control the sale and purchase of liquors. Also, some states and counties have certain drinking jurisdictions that regulate how much, as well as what kind of alcohol can be sold in those areas. In addition to these purchase regulations, the creation of bathtub gin, as well as other distillery based drinks remains, to this day, illegal. Liquors are also heavily taxed, Ten Legacies of Prohibition states that In 2014, the feds took in $7.9 billion in federal excise taxes on liquor, which by U.S. estimates is a $400 billion to $500 billion per year industry employing about four million people. This makes selling alcohol in the modern era a very expensive business.
Throughout the prohibition era, organized crime ran rampant, profiting and enforcing their bootlegging operations (Taylor, Kazmers).In The Great Gatsby, Tom Buchanan find out about Gatsby's criminal history, saying He and this Wolfshiem bought up a lot of these side-street drug-stores here and in Chicago and sold grain alcohol over the counter (Fitzgerald 133.) When prohibition ended, the mafia, realizing their loss of a source of profit, either continued to sell alcohol legally, or moved on to other questionable activities. The latter turned to the usual Mob rackets of illegal gambling, prostitution, loan sharking, narcotics and murder-for-hire.(Ten Legacies of Prohibition) Present locations, such as Las Vegas, exist and thrive because of the mafia's procession from one profitable vice to another.
Prohibition has some present day political implications as well. Founded in 1869, the Prohibition party was the first party to allow women to be members, as well as the nation's oldest third political party to date. Despite its historical influence, the party is rather insignificant today compared to its popularity back in the day. In 2012 the party's presidential candidate only garnered 512 votes according to Ten Legacies of Prohibition. Suffice it to say, this party seems to be more of a an artifact of political history rather than a powerful force of decision making.
One very beneficial present day consequence of the Prohibition Era is women's rights. In addition to the implementation of the 19th amendment, women would drink alongside men in speakeasies at this time, a very taboo concept before prohibition and the previously stated 19th amendment. Women were also gaining power in the political field, in 1923, a woman named Pauline Sabin became the first woman on the Republican National Committee(Ten Legacies of Prohibition). This was as well as a woman named Maria Brehm became America's first female candidate for vice-president. One final, and arguably, the most memorable example of an important women in the 1920s is Mabel Walker Willebrandt.
Mabel Walker Willebrandt was a female lawyer, best known for her time serving as the United States assistant attorney general from 1921 to 1929, and her relentless attitude toward the enforcement of the 18th amendment. However, one other important thing she was involved in was the reform of the prison system. According to Naomi Blumberg in her article about Willebrandt, Willebrandt was largely responsible for establishing the first federal reformatory for young male first-time offenders. Also, Willebrandt had noticed the growing number of women violating prohibition laws, leading her to advocate for female only federal prisons. In 1927, the first of the female only prisons opened in Alderson, West Virginia. Later in her life, she would support the Screen Directors Guild during the communist Witch Hunt lead by Joseph Mccarthy in the 1950s. Sadly, not long afterward, she would die of lung cancer on April 6th 1963(Blumberg). Willebrandt was woman who proved the capabilities of women in the political field and left behind many legacies of reform and progress.
Now that the history of prohibition its legacies have been discussed, we will discuss Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby's connections to it. One such example are the gangsters. They were seen at Gatsby's party, as well as in the speakeasy that Nick and Gatsby were having lunch in. (Fitzgerald 69-74) In addition to gangsters, bootleggers were also seen. In the later events of the book, Gatsby was revealed to be a bootlegger, using a medicine business to secretly sell alcohol (Fitzgerald 133-134). Gatsby also had connections in the underground, to a gangster named Mayer Wolfshiem (Fitzgerald 63-73) Lastly, while seemingly minor, the most pervasive connection to prohibition is the ownership and consumption of alcohol itself. All throughout the book people are drinking alcohol, serving it, keeping it around, or transporting it. For example, when Nick, Jordan, Gatsby and the Buchanans go to the hotel, taking alcohol along (Fitzgerald 120). In addition to alcohol being a central consumable at Gatsby's parties. (Fitzgerald 39-60) In conclusion, prohibition was an important aspect of life in the roaring 20s, and while a very seemingly minor detail in the grand scale of Fitzgerald's book, it was a pervasive underlying detail and there is evidence of it all throughout. It supports Gatsby's wealth, mystique, facilitates his generosity, and overall puts the Great in Great Gatsby.
Cite this page
The Great Gatsby and Prohibition. (2019, Jun 22).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
A Question of Euthanasia
Introduction
Humans are finite. This reality does not intimidate the mature Christian. The believer recognizes the opportunity to serve others is limited but nonetheless significant. The faithful follower seeks to live a temporary life for an eternal purpose. Even dying itself can serve this end.
If only we were all mature Christians, then the approach to life and indeed to death would not be so varied and emotive. The reality is mature Christians are in the minority and death is either wished away or in other circumstances desired and though death is inevitable, to all who have to the very minimum biological life, death can be unpredictable or predictable, quick or drawn out, peaceful and painless or painful and filled with suffering while yet to others death is a right just as the right to pursue happiness and right to life. However, to the latter, when the process of dying is accompanied by suffering and pain, then the right to life and right to pursue happiness seem to contradict.
When one is faced with these apparent contradictions, certain questions seem to dominate conversations e.g. In what circumstances is anyone justified to end their on life when in distress? Who decides when to end another's life? Can life be meaningless? Does one have a right to choose how they die? And when does the right to a dignified and humane death become more precious than the right to life?
These contradictions are heightened within the medical profession where medical personnel are faced with life and death decisions on a daily basis and petitions made by patients to care- givers to assist them escape the agony and pain that accompanies terminal illness is not uncommon. Attitudes and positions on this matter have been developed over the years and in order to have a context to the development of these attitudes, a brief history would suffice. Equally important is a description of the terms that have been adopted over the years to describe the so called help.
Classification of euthanasia.
Euthanasia.
Its described as the intentional termination of the life of an incurably ill person out of compassion for the persons suffering. It is broadly classified into two categories: passive and active.
Active euthanasia.
This occurs as a result of the administration of a pharmaceutical agent that results in the termination of life and is further classified as voluntary, involuntary and non-voluntary.
Voluntary active euthanasia.
Involves administering of a pharmaceutical agent at the patients' request resulting in death. Nonvoluntary active euthanasia.
It implies that a lethal dose of medication is given to a patient that is incompetent but who had previously expressed the will to be killed if suffering enormous pain.
Involuntary active euthanasia.
Involves cases where family, friends or physicians make the decision to end a patient's life knowing that this person would want to be killed under these circumstances.
Passive euthanasia.
This describes the death of a person who is terminally ill by forgoing potentially life prolonging measures. Along with the forgoing of the application of life prolonging technologies, is the actual administering of palliative treatment that may result in death . The physician's main intent is to control pain but the medicinal dosage may also hasten death . It is subclassified as voluntary, nonvoluntary and involuntary.
Voluntary passive euthanasia.
This describes cases in which the patient requests that certain medicinal treatment be withheld or withdrawn. It also includes incapable patients who indirectly communicate their treatment wishes with written advance directives or by previous oral testimony.
Nonvoluntary euthanasia.
This includes cases in which one does not know for sure what treatment an incompetent patient wants but there is a good reason that the person would want to die in the circumstances. Involuntary passive euthanasia.
Describes cases in which death of the patient(who is terminally ill) occurs as a direct result of withdrawal of medical technology that is life prolonging without the express will of the patient but relying on other parties to effect the withdrawal. It assumed this is the patient's best interest.
Physician assisted suicide (PAS).
This describes a situation where the choice in dying rests fully with the patient but specifically the physician supplies the lethal dose of medication to end life and the patient administers it to him or herself.
Historical perspectives of PAS.
To comprehend fully the intricacies of the current ethical debate concerning PAS and, it is important to provide a historical view of its conceptual origins. Proposals to legalize PAS for the terminally ill became a focal point of public policy debate in several countries toward the end of the last century. The place of the physician in treating the dying patient received significant attention in those early years. The physician, it was thought could slow down the unavoidable process of dying. Current technology has allowed for early diagnosis, better palliative care as well as more effective pain management making terminal illness more chronic in nature. Many patients with illnesses such as AIDS and cancer are living longer and dying more delayed deaths. Technological advances in medicine have also contributed to this prolonged dying and prior to these advances terminally ill patients died sooner and physicians had no choice but to offer comfort until death. These advances have helped create a controversy that has opened the doors for increased concern about the right-to-die. The capacity to prolong life and consequently prolong suffering was a catalyst for many of the contemporary arguments prompting legislators to introduce legislation in favor of PAS.
There has been an apparent acceleration in the legalization of PAS over the last two decades which is partly attributed to the importance culture now places on autonomy, the changing personal and cultural attitudes towards suffering, pain and death and the pursuit of happiness and a dignified death combined with new found freedom within the political system of democracy, all drive people towards seeking their inalienable rights including the right to have a dignified death.
Most significant is the advancement in healthcare even when the quality of life is low and questionable. Modern medicine seems to treat biological life as an absolute value . This prolonging of life in this state is deemed dehumanizing giving the pursuit of PAS a human face.
This accelerated efforts in legalizing PAS, has raised legal. ethical and moral questions within the medical, theological and legal fraternities and several routes to adjudicate an ethical position have been taken. In this paper, I will consider the theory of Utilitarianism and assess the pros and cons as well as the impact of applying it in regard to PAS and compare and contrast it with a Christian perspective.
Cite this page
A Question Of Euthanasia. (2019, Jun 21).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Utilitarianism and Christianity
A Christian perspective to PAS
Pain suffering and death lie at the heart of the Christian story and for Christians the fundamental question with regards to PAS is what does life in Jesus Christ the one who hang on the cross, suffered and died a not so dignified death enable and require? Identifying with Christ in turn leads to questions of biblical authority and interpretation of Christianity. Jesus does not die a good death since for may a good death comes after many years of a fulfilling life in old age but Jesus dies tragically young, A good death is by way of natural causes but Jesus dies at the hands of people who hate him, a good death is easy and painless but Jesus dies a painful death.
Christians know that since the particulars of Christ death may not necessarily apply to them, the central question has to do with the witness Christ calls them to make and as Christians encounter pain suffering and death in their own lives and the lives of others they need to examine the entire biblical witness which culminates in Christ and the communities' witness to him.
Therefore, being faced with pressure to succumb to proponents of PAS it would be prudent to examine the biblical perspectives of pain, suffering and death in order to draw conclusions on whether PAS is right or wrong from the biblical perspective.
Scripture presents several different strands of thinking about pain, suffering and death and each stand in relation to the other. These stand in some tension which each other but Christian identity rest not in the selection of one or the other but in living faithfully in the tension they create.
There is an account of reported voluntary euthanasia involving King Saul and an Amalekite.
The unnamed Amalekite tells King David that he killed Saul at Saul's request, as Saul was wounded in battle. David's response is to have the Amalekite killed for touching Gods anointed. If indeed euthanasia and by extension PAS was beneficial, David would have rewarded the Amalekite and not sentenced him to death. The biblical hermeneutics would have several approaches to this passage and its meaning however it sets an attitude of restrain and disapproval against deliberate acts of terminating a life on the basis of mercy. Pain, suffering and death is also a consequence the fall and Paul also states the all humanity inherits and continues the history of sin and suffers death though only in Christ , the new Adam, is pain, suffering and death brought to an end . Pain and suffering is also a mystery as seen in the book of Job where he argues he has not sinned and if he had, the pain and suffering are disproportionately great, the psalmist also protest against undeserved pain and suffering he asserts his innocence and demands the God vindicates him, indeed we also see Jesus cry my God my God why have you forsaken me? This cry of anguish can be a faithful act. In demanding the God listen one expresses confidence that God is ultimately present in pain and suffering and the duty of the community is to stand with those who protest and to bear their burden as their own and not to complain it away. Pain, suffering and death is also redemptive as Paul reminds us that suffering can deepen our faith and trials and temptations become opportunities to learn endurance and to refine and purify faith. Ultimately also for the Christian, Christ has proclaimed victory over sin through his suffering, death and resurrection and the Christians encouragement therefore is this process leads to victory over the devil.
In an attempt to apply the teachings of the holy scriptures, the Christian will not fear death and is encouraged to be present to the dying making all attempts to make one's physical condition as comfortable as possible and will not seek to prolong ones' dying, proclaiming the new life in Jesus and entrusting the dying to his care. On the other hand, they must remember that God may be acting redemptively either for the dying's sake or on behalf of others. They will therefore refrain from actions that hasten death and be open to ways that God may be teaching them about trust, love and surrender to God. It is for this reason that traditionally Christians draw a distinction between active euthanasia and allowing one to die. They can support the withholding or withdrawing of treatment when death is imminent and medical intervention cannot reverse the dying process. Though this distinction is imperfect and indeed ethicists have argued that the intent is the same i.e hasten death.
As concerns unrelieved pain and suffering we see Job crying out against the meaningless of the pain and suffering and his protest becomes an act of faith even in his attempt to seek meaning of this pain and suffering. Christians therefore should not despair when pain and suffering is meaningless but the community should instead be present and show solidarity and bear each other's burdens and support each other as we are enabled e.g. provide adequate healthcare (especially pain control), bring together, inform adequately and empower all parties involved in end of life decisions as well as help parties involved deal with the emotional and spiritual suffering that makes continuing to live difficult. Indeed, this is compassion in action as in its absence euthanasia and PAS becomes an easier choice to take. Compassion is therefore the hallmark of good end of life care.
The challenge to the Christian is to address these bioethical issues to those of different religions, the agnostic as well as the atheists among others. A unique group is the intellectuals whose main contrary world view is that of scientism and the most prevalent antichristian position is privatized therapeutic syncretism.
That practicing scientism avoid the question of eternity and the significance of finitude. They refuse to acknowledge the real implication of life being infinitely insignificant. The question the evangelicals must ask themselves when dealing with those of such a worldview is : Can there be basis of for common discussion and at least common conclusions on bioethical issues? The answer is in the social contract which requires the acceptance of the concept that all human beings are endowed with fundamental worth and have a right to life that cannot be reduced.
The social contract is an agreement for the moment and not for eternity. It therefore depends on persons having biological life and protects the individual from the state and other individuals including corporations. The social contract requires that one be deemed a person: a human being.
Utilitarianism and Christianity's points of convergence
Utilitarianism acknowledges that for majority to be happy sometimes the individual forgoes his/her happiness. This agrees with the concept of sacrifice in Christianity where the good of the others is placed ahead of ones own good. Such a sacrifice would be judged as morally good in utilitarianism even though it results in pain to the minority.
Through scripture we note that God has nothing against happiness if this happiness is in conformity to His word e,g as depicted in the beatitudes. If the Christian then believes that their desire to be happy is God given then happiness itself can be related to goodness and the Christian will have a point of confluence when the utilitarian refers to happiness as intrinsically good.
Christianity postulates that all are equal before God . This agrees with the utilitarian perspective of treating individuals and others with a degree of equality when determining what is morally right or wrong.
Although utilitarianism rejects faith as a sufficient basis for ethics, it does not necessarily leave God out of the picture. Theistic utilitarianism simply argues that we need to understand how God communicates his will to us i.e. God teaches us through our senses. Christian utilitarianism says that proper observation of the world should tell us what God expects from us since the universe is God's creation. We are created to be happy and the result od doing what God intends is happiness. If it be true that God desires the happiness of His creatures, and this was his purpose in their creation, utility is not only not a godless doctrine but more profoundly religious that any other.
Utilitarianism and Christianity's points of divergence
Classical utilitarianism is empirical stemming from an understanding that we as human beings desire pleasure and seek to avoid pain and human beings are seen as pleasure/pain organisms and bundles of experiences. In such a view a person has no value to herself or to others except for the satisfaction of experiences. Such a view leaves no room for the Christian understanding of human beings as made in the image of God with intrinsic rights. Our value as people is derived from God, who created us in his own image.
The principle of utility seems to conflict with the teachings of Jesus. Christ invited the believer to join him in suffering, always to place others first, to turn the other cheek and to forgive. He also teaches that real happiness comes through the service of others ;a kind of happiness that cannot be measured or predicted in utilitarian terms.
Utilitarianism does not consider motives and character as important, only the results and consequences. However to the Christian, character and motives(heart) rather than individual acts are key to moral good. To the Christian virtues like love ,joy, peace, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control, are the parameters through which right and wrong are assessed.
Finally, utilitarianism assumes that truth comes through our senses and does not need to rely on a source. This is fundamentally in conflict with the Christian view as the latter derives truth from a source revealed to us through the scriptures. Jesus says I am the way the and the truth and the life . No one comes to the father except though me. It is through accepting Christ and walking in Him that the truth in all things is manifest and clearly this point of view is not accepted by utilitarianism as its heavily reliant on faith rather that senses and empirical evidence.
Conclusion
The right to die and dying with dignity are common slogans for the advancement of a narrative that supports PAS. The mature Christian should use this to shape their involvement and contribution to good end of life care. Faced with aggressive and innovative use of medical technology to sustain biological life often in the name of sanctity of life , the church must protect the right to die with human and Christian dignity cognizant that the meaning of a dignified death is given a deeper meaning than simply the ability die by one's own choosing but rather, protecting a dignified death means that the dying need to be assured that their lives will not be arbitrarily shortened, that they will not have to suffer needlessly, that they will not be subjected to unreasonable and burdensome therapies, that medical technology will be applied judiciously, that free, informed and quality consent will be respected and that they will not be abused or abandoned by the community in their dying. This then means that excellent palliative care as a counter measure to PAS needs to be pursued more aggressively with the Christian fully engaged.
Cite this page
Utilitarianism And Christianity. (2019, Jun 21).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Emily Dickinson and William Shakespeare
Cite this page
Emily Dickinson And William Shakespeare. (2019, Jun 21).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
A Development of Feminism
Cite this page
A Development Of Feminism. (2019, Jun 20).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Modern Racism and Sexism
Modern Racism and Sexism
If the United States truly had racial justice, all people would receive fair treatment; there would be equal opportunities for all people. There would not be inequity in the opportunities and outcomes of races. Racial justice would occur in daily life and on television. Unfortunately, racism still exists today. As Garner (2017) reported, racism has become ingrained in social practices as well as institutions, and it results in an imbalance of power. Often, misperceptions cause people to believe that racism must be accompanied by abuse, violence, and segregation; however, Garner (2017) asserts the absence of such drastic measures does not prevent actions and behaviors from being examples of racism. Racism can actually be seen throughout the entire social continuum. Some argue that racism only becomes an issue when academics and activists invoke the issue; for example, Adams (2006) argues that some people simply change the definition of racism at will.
Specifically, people redefine the word to support the ideas and plans they are supporting at the time (Adams, 2016). While Garner (2017) concedes that there is a lack of consensus about the meaning of racism, he defines racism as a belief system or doctrine which postulates a hierarchy among various human races or ethnic groups (page 16). As a social phenomenon, people may engage in racism through their thoughts, attitudes, actions, and behaviors.
Racism can be seen as people go about their daily lives. In fact, people do not even need to leave home to see racism in action. All one has to do is turn on the television, and racism can be seen front and center.
For more than a decade, fans have tuned their televisions to The Bachelorette on Monday nights as they watch a single woman as she dates a couple dozen men in hopes of finding love and ultimately a husband. Last summer, fans watched Rachel Lindsay, an attorney from Dallas, Texas, as she starred in the show's leading role. In an interview prior to the start of her season of The Bachelorette, Lindsay admitted to feeling a variety of emotions. Knowing that all eyes would be on her, she explained that she was scared. Although her goal was to find love on the show, she knew that people would be judging her. Then, she decided to focus on the positives of the experience. She recognized and openly discussed being the first black bachelorette in the show's history. Despite this recognition, she described her search of love would be just like all of the previous leading ladies in the show's history. In describing her ideal partner, she wanted a soul mate that has a sense of humor, enjoys sports, is self-aware, has a large heart, and displays good morals (Barnes, 2017).
During the last week of June, The Bachelorette was aired two nights that week. When Lindsay was cast as the show's first black female lead, nobody would have guessed that racism would have become a plotline as she tried to find love. One of the men chosen to compete for Lindsay's love was Lee Garrett, a 30 year-old singer and songwriter from Nashville, Tennessee. Throughout the season, it could be argued that he got more joy from fighting with and playing mind games with Kenny King, a black wrestler from Las Vegas, also competing for Lindsay's love. While Garrett continuously engaged in conversations about King during the show's first four weeks, everything came to a head during the show's fifth week. As the season unfolded, Garrett spent the majority of his time talking about King instead of promoting himself. Various instances of Garrett's behaviors and racism can be seen at the following URL: https://abc.go.com/shows/the-bachelorette/episode-guide/season-13
As the show aired on Monday, June 26, 2017, viewers witnessed Garrett referring to King as being aggressive; the URL for this episode follows: https://abc.go.com/shows/the-bachelorette/episode-guide/season-13/5-week-5-part-1. Viewers watched as Garrett continued to refer to King as aggressive; meanwhile, King responded by calling Garrett a snake. Eventually, Will Gaskins, another one of Lindsay's potential soul mates joined the conversation. Gaskins provided Garrett with a historical analysis of the word aggressive and what it meant to the black community. Gaskins conveyed the manner in which the word aggressive had long been used negatively against black men over the years in order for other people to justify their actions against black men. Garrett accused King of resorting to the race card. Gaskins, another white contestant, strongly disagreed with Garrett's assessment; instead, he told Garrett that he truly believed that King was offended by his actions. Specifically, King took offense with Garrett's choice of words. Clearly, King interpreted that word very negatively; for him, the word has a racial connotation. As Garrett was further portrayed in the scene, he did not hesitate to say that his actions were intentional; in fact, he described that his actions were calculated. After his conversation with Gaskins, Garrett blamed the incident on King and King's worldview. He further asserted that he did not comprehend the race card. Taking no accountability for his actions, Garrett tried to portray the problem with the scene resting with King; in fact, he maintained that King has issues (The Bachelorette Video Clips, 2018).
In episodes earlier during the month, Garrett's racist views were first revealed. In fact, he had compared The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), a civil rights organization in the United States, with the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), a well-known racist organization; he described both organizations as racists and explained that one of the group's has enough sense to know to cover their faces. Although the show's producers claimed that they had no knowledge of Garrett's tweets when he was cast, he had a history of posting racist remarks. Additionally, during the episode of The Bachelorette that aired on June 5, Garrett was antagonizing Eric Bigger, another black gentleman vying for Lindsay's affections. Upon hearing of the argument, Lindsay listened to both of the men show was dating; however, she eventually took King's side. Garrett was sent up during the two-on-one date between Lindsay, him and King. In explaining her actions, Lindsay said it was an easy decision; she explained that she was not able to trust Garrett (The Bachelorette Video Clips, 2018).
Clearly, the definition of racism promoted by Garner (2017) came into play in the June 16, 2017, episode of The Bachelorette. Viewers watched Garrett display the social phenomenon of racism in his thoughts, words, and actions. Garrett had always been careful to make sure that his badgering of King and the other black men did not happen where Lindsay could hear him. As the show demonstrated, Garrett clearly was intolerant and displayed racist behaviors.
Sexism refers to a form of discrimination or prejudice that finds its basis in a person's gender or sex. While sexism can impact anyone, it predominantly impacts girls and women (Matsumoto, 2001). Sexism has been linked to gender roles as well as stereotypes (Nakdiment, 1984). Last December, an episode of Teachers aired a perfect example of sexism (Funk, 2017). The URL for the specific episode was the following: https://www.tvland.com/video-clips/032bia/teachers-teachers-clip--who-gave-me-sexism-
In the episode of Teachers, two teachers are talking as two other teachers approach. Three of the four teachers are females. One of the female teachers looks at the other female teacher and says, Linda, you are back from maternity leave so soon. Isn't it hard to be away from your baby? In disgust, Linda looks at the other teacher and responds, Why don't you ask, Dan, that. He and his wife just had a baby”a week ago! The teacher who asked the question suddenly exclaims, Oh my God! It's a scientific law; I'm sexist! Who made me this way because I did not do this to myself! Seriously, who gave me sexism? Her friend explains that somebody probably engrained it into her when she was little. Suddenly, the sexist teacher blames in on Mrs. Wyatt, her elementary teacher. She continues to explain that she loved science as a young student, but she tells her friend that Mrs. Wyatt only encouraged her in penmanship and said she would eventually write beautiful love letters. She continues and reports that she could have been a rocket scientist for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Funk, 2017).
There are two different types of sexism; it can be described as benevolent sexism or hostile sexism. The two different forms of sexism hold different stereotypes of women. Benevolent sexism looks at women through positive stereotypes; hostile sexism views women through negative stereotypes. With benevolent sexism, women are viewed as more empathetic and kinder. With hostile sexism, women are seen as less brave and less competent (Glick & Fiske, 2001). In the episode of Teachers, the teacher displayed sexism toward Linda when she expressed shock that she was already back at school; instead, she thought she should be at home taking care of her baby. In this instance, she was viewing Linda through benevolent sexism because she is viewing women as more nurturing. On the other hand, the teacher also illustrates another example of sexism; she explains the sexism that Mrs. Wyatt displayed during her days as a student in elementary school. The current teacher reported being very good at science and dreaming of being a rocket scientist; however, she explained that Mrs. Wyatt discouraged her love of science. Instead, Mrs. Wyatt promoted penmanship and love to her. Clearly, Mrs. Wyatt was also displaying sexism. In this particular instance of sexism, Mrs. Wyatt was displaying hostile sexism. She was suggesting that her young female student should not consider science as a career because girls are less intelligent than boys; she was suggesting that boys do science and girls write.
In looking at all of this, it is important to consider prejudice. First, it is important to recognize that prejudice is an attitude. As with all attitudes, there are three components that comprise the attitude; the components include affective, behavioral, and cognitive. When someone displays that they are prejudice, they exhibit a negative or hostile attitude toward people toward people simply because they are part of a particular group. Once a behavior accompanies the attitude, it results in discrimination. It is possible for a person to hold certain stereotypes about a group without engaging in discrimination (Aronson, Wilson, Akert & Sommers, 2016).
In looking at these examples from the television shows, elements of prejudice are apparent. For example, going back to The Bachelorette, Garrett was prejudiced against black people. Garrett held an attitude in which he believed that all black people were the same. He was constantly demonstrating hostile behavior toward the black male contestants. He assigned negative characteristics to all of the black men on the show, and it was clear that he also applied these same beliefs to all black people when his racist tweets were revealed. For instance, he compared the NAACP with the KKK; in fact, he called both groups racist. He went so far to say that only one of these two racist groups knows enough to hide their faces. Meanwhile, in the episode of Teachers, we saw the one teacher display prejudiced behavior when she told Linda that she was so surprised to see her back at school already because it was so soon for her to be back at school. Meanwhile, Linda explained that Dan, her male colleague, and his wife just had a baby a week so the other teacher should ask Dan that question; however, the teacher did not ask Dan that. Even though she was a woman, she was suggesting that mothers should be staying at home with their babies. Then, we learn about the teacher's elementary teacher, Mrs. Wyatt. We also saw that Mrs. Wyatt had prejudiced ideas. Specifically, Mrs. Wyatt had a negative attitude toward girls; she did not think that they were as smart as boys. Because science is typically considered a more difficult subject, Mrs. Wyatt suggested that science was for boys. She believed that boys were more intelligent and could do science. She thought girls should write and think about love.
At times, we hear racism and sexism referred to as being institutionalized. Institutional racism refers to racist attitudes that held against a minority by the majority in a society; the discrimination may be in a legal form or illegal form. Discrimination and stereotypes are part of the norm in institutional racism. Meanwhile, institutional sexism refers to majority held attitudes that are part of a society that accepts stereotypes and discrimination as the norm.
I do not think Garrett's discrimination represented institutionalized racism. His attitudes do not represent attitudes held by the majority in society. In fact, the other white men in the house with Garrett did not sit by quietly. Instead, they pointed out his problems and took him to task for his behavior. In fact, by the end of the season, when the men return to talk about the entire season, the entire cast held him accountable for his behavior. As for the instance of the teacher asking the other teacher about being back at work so soon, her behavior was not institutional sexism. That may have been a form of sexism back in the 1950s when women were expected to stay home, cook, clean, and take care of their children.
However, today, our society is much more accepting of women having careers and a family. Most people hold the belief that it is up to each woman to decide whether she will have a career or stay home and have a career. When women have careers and choose to have a child, most employers will now offer women time away from work for their maternity leave. Under the Family Medical Leave Act, women can take 12 weeks off from work and have their jobs protected; some companies have gone beyond that and allow women to stay home longer when they have a baby. Thus, that instance of sexism was held by the teacher and does not meet the definition of institutional sexism. As for Mrs. Wyatt, her issue of sexism has also changed over the years. Many years ago, there was a belief that boys did better at math and science; girls did better with verbal abilities. Many teachers thought like Mrs. Wyatt did at one time. However, now, girls are encouraged to take whatever classes they want. In fact, I've seen some of the physics and calculus classes at my school that now have more girls than guys in the class. Also, women often enter careers in the sciences now. In fact, I just read a study last week that actually showed there are more women majoring in the sciences than men. Thus, Mrs. Wyatt's example of sexism does not meet the definition of institutional racism in today's society.
In trying to understand racism and sexism, it is important to think about society and how people learn such behaviors. According to the social learning theory, social behavior is learned; in fact, the theory asserts that people learn everything from altruism to aggression by watching those around them. Most social behavior is developed after watching and emulating others. Observation alone does not fully explain the learning that takes place; thus, there is also a cognitive component to the theory. Through the cognitive component, people their thought processes to what they have observed. The theory maintains that there are consequences when young people are exposed to racism and sexism. Because young people often learn from observing and mimicking the behavior of those around them, there is definitely a concern that young children will come to think that such behaviors are acceptable. They will think that it is appropriate to talk to people inappropriately. They will think that it is okay to think they are better than other groups. They will think it is okay to have prejudice attitudes. Then, they will think they can go a step further and actually engage in discrimination. When children see any aggressive behavior, social learning theory suggests that they will then engage in the behavior. One of the best ways to minimize the chance of young people becoming racist or sexist is to control their exposure to racism and sexism. If they do see racism and sexism, it is important to talk to them and explain why they are not acceptable. When children have seen aggressive role models, it is important to make sure that they later see nonaggressive behavior modeled. Likewise, if they see racism or sexism, it is important to make sure they are then exposed to appropriate behavior and non-racism and non-sexism (Aronson, Wilson, Akert & Sommers, 2016).
References:
- Adams, M. (2006, April 10). Mike Adams - A new definition of racism. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from https://townhall.com/columnists/mikeadams/2006/04/10/a-new-definition-of-racism-n1161192
- Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (2016). Social psychology. Boston: Pearson.
- The Bachelorette Video Clips. (2018). Retrieved September 15, 2018, from https://abc.go.com/-shows/the-bachelorette/episode-guide/season-13
- Barnes, K. (2017, May 22). Q&A with Rachel Lindsay, the first African-American 'Bachelorette'. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.espn.com/espnw/culture/- article/19435659/qa-rachel-lindsay-first-african-american-bachelorette
- Funk, J. (2017, December 6). Teachers Clip: Who Gave Me Sexism? - Teachers (Video Clip) | TV Land. Retrieved September 21, 2018, from https://www.tvland.com/video-clips/032bia/teachers-teachers-clip--who-gave-me-sexism-
Garner, S. (2017). Racisms: An introduction. Los Angeles: SAGE. - Matsumoto, D. R. (2001). The handbook of culture and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Glick, P. & Fiske, S. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
- Nakdimen, K. A. (1984). The physiognomic basis of sexual stereotyping. American Journal ofPsychiatry, 141(4), 499-503.
Cite this page
Modern Racism And Sexism. (2019, Jun 20).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Embryonic Stem Cell Solution for American Culture
More than thirty years ago, in 1981, scientists were able to successfully extract embryonic stem cells from mice, effectively opening a door to new discoveries in scientific and medical fields. Stem cells are unspecialized cells meaning that they have no set function in the body. Scientists have also found ways to influence these cells into becoming tissues, organ-specific cells, and other specialized cells. In addition to this, they are also capable of replenishing themselves through cell devision. However, this research has since moved onto human testing, essentially creating some major moral issues. The biggest dilemma being: in order to obtain the embryonic stem cells, potential human life must be destroyed. However, the stem cells can alleviate the suffering of living people. In order to find a practical solution looking through a cultural lens will help see the beneficial and inimical effects on people within the U.S. Though research on these cells is still being conducted, these moral problems are hindering funding. Yet, it is important to find a solution because stem cells hold the potential to fix a plethora of health issues. While this experimentation creates difficulty in America's culture, it is important to continue the research so the process can be perfected in order to help meet citizens' medical needs.
One reason why this research is struggling is lack of experience and practice with these cells, meaning some embryos are not being used fully, and their lives are ending unnecessarily. In America this brings up many problems due to the many religions that believe in preserving life, and assert that life begins when conceived. However, one possible solution would be developing adult stem cells in order to have as much flexibility as embryonic stem cells. Dennis Hollinger, president as well as distinguished professor of Christian Ethics at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, argues that Healing is regarded as the 'greatest good' which will usher in the most happiness or pleasure for the greatest number of people. Though he thinks embryonic stem cells are still the way to go, he is not wrong about health bringing happiness. In an article by University of Notre Dame on alternative stem cell sources they suggest using Induced Pluripotent Stem cells. These are taken from somatic cells and adding small amount of specific genes into them, thus, iPS cells do not result in the death of any embryos or require the use of unfertilized eggs. This substitute could be a good a sturdy solution to using stem cells from embryos, and help the overall health of U.S. citizens.
Adding to the issue of ending life unnecessarily, another ethical or theological problem is that this can be seen as playing God. Peter Dabrock is a German theologian as well as a university teacher at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, explains this well by saying If human beings try to conquer the position of the one who embodies the most fundamental difference from mankind, namely God, they are suspected of exceeding the limits of man and thus of responsible behavior. Though according to John Tierney, writer for the New York Times, this has now spread to cloning was well as genetic engineering making critics on the right and the left fret about the morality of stem-cell research. Of course this is unsettling and only adds to the negative connotation associated with embryonic stem cell research.
While the stem cells are thought to be developed in the future, it is also thought to be very expensive. The process of procuring the cells is very challenging, so having them used in medical practices would be costly. Though it is slowly becoming more affordable, it still coasts a few thousand for treatment. According to Paul Knoepfler, regular contributor to the Niche as well as professor at Davis School of Medicine, reduced prices start at $7,000 to $8,000. Knoepfler also states that Whether inside or outside the US, insurance does not cover the costs of these potentially dangerous, unproven treatments. This is concerning considering a survey from The Commonwealth Fund shows about 79 million Americans struggle to pay medical bills for basic healthcare.
In addition to these cells conflicting with religious and moral beliefs, and common healthcare they have also started effecting American politics. Within the past few decades the pro-life movement has had great influence in the U.S. However, policy debates over embryonic stem cell research during the Presidency of George W. Bush exposed deep, moral fissures amongst American conservatives. states Alexander smith, Senior Leverhulme Research Fellow and Assistant Professor in Sociology at Warwick University. From this debate of medical v.s. the religious right, the dickey-wicker amendment was made, stating that federal funding for research pertaining to human embryos is no longer legal. Yet, during Bill Clintons presidency the law was interpreted to allow research onstemcells that were obtained, to begin with, using private funds. Says Peter Grier regular writer for The Christian Science Monitor, as well as co-winner of the Society of Professional Journalists National Reporting Award. This is important of course because politics lead people, and presidents guide the citizens.
Despite the loss of possible life, many still favor the stem cells for their versatile uses. According to a pie chart, put out by Your Congress” Your Health Survey Charlton Research Company for Research! America in 2009, 39% of Americans strongly favor the expansion of this research. Though these stem cells provide promise for cures to many ailments there are many other solutions. According an article by Krista Conger, a science writer for the medical school's Office of Communication & Public Affairs, Vice President for Research and Economic Development at Montana state university Renee Reijo Pera says that only about 30% of embryos develop to the blastocyst stage. This is crucial three to five day period after fertilization because it is when the stem cells are extracted. Even when they do reach this phase seven out of ten embryos will have abnormal chromosomes. Though some make it through this process they are also capable of triggering responses within the human body, as mentioned before, because they are unrecognized. They may also struggle with their set function within the body, essentially meaning they failed. Thus, it is simply wiser to develop other types of stem cells, even if they are not as multifaceted.
In the end, it is important Americans take action to protect all life no matter how young and no matter how small. The research started all those years ago started with mice, and has now spread to politics, religion, and medical debates within the U.S. Though this research can help alleviate suffering of people we must be aware of the cost. At the end of the day, this experimentation and research the forbidding expansion of medical cures rises from the lost lives of these embryos.
Works Cited
Americans Favor Expanding Federal Funding for ESC Research Your Congress” Your Health Survey Charlton Research Company for Research! America, June 2009. newvoicesforresearch.blogspot.com/2009/08/where-do-americans-stand-on-stem-cell.html. Accessed 14 December. 2018.
Cha, Ariana Eunjung. How Religion Is Coming to Terms with Modern Fertility Methods.The Washington Post, WP Company, 27 Apr. 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/national/how-religion-is-coming-to-terms-with-modern-fertility-methods/?utm_term=.9f397129e2b4. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Conger, Krista. Earlier, More Accurate Prediction of Embryo Survival Enabled by Research. EHR National Symposium, Standford School of Medicine , 28 Oct. 2009, med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2010/10/earlier-more-accurate-prediction-of-embryo-survival-enabled-by-research.html. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Dabrock, Peter. Playing God? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge Systems and synthetic biology vol. 3,1-4 (2009): 47-54. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Grier, Peter. In Stem-Cell Debate, a Culture War. (Cover Story).Christian Science Monitor, vol. 93, no. 155, 6 July 2001, p. 1.EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=4762641&site=ehost-live. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Hollinger, Dennis P. Stem Cells & Our Moral Culture.The Center for Bioethics & Human Dignity, Trinity International University , 15 Nov. 2001, cbhd.org/content/stem-cells-our-moral-culture. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Holt, Nathalia. The Case for Fetal-Cell Research.The New York Times, The New York Times, 30 July 2015, www.nytimes.com/2015/07/30/opinion/the-case-for-fetal-cell-research.html. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Jensen, David. Stem Cell: Feds' Crackdown Could Affect California.Capitol Weekly, 3 Oct. 2018, capitolweekly.net/stem-cell-feds-crackdown-california/. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Knoepfler, Paul. How Much Do Stem Cell Treatments Really Cost? The Niche, 22 Feb. 2015, ipscell.com/2015/02/stemcelltreatmentcost/.Accessed 9 December 2018
Smith, Alexander Thomas T. Faith, Science and the Political Imagination: Moderate Republicans and the Politics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Sociological Review, vol. 58, no. 4, Nov. 2010, pp. 623“637.EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01943.x. Accessed 14 December. 2018.
Stem Cell Division: Abortion Law and Its Influence on the Adoption of Radically Different Embryonic Stem Cell Legislation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.Texas International Law Journal, vol. 39, no. 3, Spring 2004, pp. 479“519.EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=13663931&site=ehost-live. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Stem Cells: Frequently Asked Questions about Stem Cell Research.Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 24 Oct. 2018, www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/bone-marrow-transplant/in-depth/stem-cells/art-20048117. Survey: 79 Million Americans Have Problems with Medical Bills or Debt. Commonwealth Fund, www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/survey-79-million-americans-have-problems-medical-bills-or-debt. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Tierney, John. Are Scientists Playing God? It Depends on Your Religion . The New York Times, The New York Times, 20 Nov. 2007, www.nytimes.com/2007/11/20/science/20tier.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=39F729F1AC3AFA2ADFFCA657444CF4F3&gwt=pay. Accessed 14 December 2018.
University of Notre Dame. Alternative Stem Cell Sources // Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine // University of Notre Dame. Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, stemcell.nd.edu/research/alternative-stem-cell-sources/. Accessed 14 December 2018.
Cite this page
Embryonic Stem Cell Solution for American Culture. (2019, Jun 19).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/
Stem Cell Delivery in Regenerative Engineering and Medicine
Regenerate the Vascular Tissue
Blood vessels composed of endothelial cells and mural cells play key roles in tissue regeneration and repair by serving as conduits to deliver oxygen and nutrients to injured and newly-formed tissues.[88] Many CVDs such as coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral vascular disease (PAD) are resulted from the loss of vascular supply leading to organ failure. Regeneration of blood vessels can be generally divided into two major aspects: the neovascularization in ischemic tissues, and repairing of injured blood vessels.[89]
Insufficient neovascularization is the essential hurdle for treatment of ischemic diseases, especially coronary artery diseases (CADs), by regeneration of thick tissues (> 200 ??m) that cannot survival under nutrients diffusion supply alone. Delivery of endothelial cells (ECs) or related progenitor cells together with stem cells can effectively improve the neovascularization, which consequentially enhance the efficacy of stem cell therapy. For instance, a recent research reported by Zhang group encapsulated a combination of hiPSC-CMs, hiPSC-ECs, and hiPSC-derived smooth muscle cells (hiPSC-SMCs) in fibrinogen gel at ratio of 2:1:1 to fabricated human cardiac muscle patches (hCMPs) for MI treatment. Co-delivery of the hiPSC-ECs and hiPSC-SMCs with fibrinogen gel into the porcine model of MI leaded to angiogenesis factor-enriched exosome secretion that significantly improved CMs survival and maturation, and contributed to the engraftment and angiogenesis at periscar border zone, which improved functional recovery of myocardium as a consequence. Besides the co-delivery strategy, direct encapsulation of pro-survival peptides in biomaterials was also proved to improve angiogenesis (Figure 5).[90] Wu group conjugated bone morphogenetic protein-2 peptide analogue (BMP2), erythropoietin peptide analogue (EPO), and fibroblast growth factor-2 peptide analogue (FGF2) with collagen fibers (Col?— D?— Pep) via dendrimer linker to realize the slow release of the pro-survival factors to delivered BMMNCs. The peptide had similar biological effects as the full-length protein, but with improved stability, fewer side effects and better delivery. Due to the chemical conjugation, the pro-survival factors can be slowly released by degradation of the collagen hydrogel. The hydrogel delivery system improved the cell survival and retention. In vivo delivery of the BMMNCs with the Col?— D?— Pep hydrogel improved the blood perfusion in ischemic limb of both severe combined immune-deficient mice and immunocompetent mice.
Besides the paracrine effect, ECs derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC, including ESCs and iPSCs) were reported to integrate with host tissue to from vascular structures.[91] The researchers from Yoon Group delivered the hPSC-ECs using a self-assembled peptide amphiphile conjugated with RGDS (PA-RGDS) nanomatrix gel into ischemic limb to reconstruct the vascular structure for CVDs treatment. The PA-RGDS molecule was consisted of a hydrophobic alkyl tail, and hydrophilic domain of cell adhesive ligand RGDS and biodegradable sequence of metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2). The RGD ligand promoted the adhesion and avoided anoikis of encapsulated hPSC-ECs in nanomatrix gel which is critical for cell survival during engraftment, while the MMP-2 site provided a controlled degradation of the gel which played key roles in cell integration with the host tissue.[92] Although the mechanism was not shown, the PA-RGDS nanomatrix preserved the cell viability from oxidative stress which is important cytoprotection as discussed. Meanwhile, the nanomatrix gel could enhance the retention of delivered cells that were still detectable up to 21 weeks. After 10 months, the transplanted ECs integrated into host tissues which contribute to the neovascularization in ischemic areas. Additionally, providing the structural guidance such as micro-channels would further accelerate the neovascularization process.[80b, 93]
Dysfunction of the narrowed arteries results in reduced blood supply to organs that will cause ischemic disease such as CAD, stroke and periphery artery disease (PAD). Current repairing strategy is bypass surgery using autologous grafts (e.g. patient vein) or synthetic polymer graft (e.g. Teflon). However, the availability of autologous grafts is patient-limited availability and the harvest process is invasive.[94] However, the usage of synthetic graft usually resulted in repeated revascularization procedures due to the acute and chronic occlusion caused by graft infection and other complication.[95] Recent development in biomaterials and cell therapy could shed light on the possible solution. For instance, Woo group manufactured the engineered vascular conduits (EVCs) using cell sheets from patient-derived smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and fibroblasts.[96] The EVCs was further perfused with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) for maturation. The artificial mature EVCs showed native artery comparable structure and mechanical strength, which leaded to completely recovery of blood perfusion in ligated hindlimb of rats. Besides the cannular vascular grafts, stem cell patch was also shown to be useful in repairing of ateries. Mayer group fabricated a hybrid scaffold using an elastomeric polymer of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) and methacrylated gelatin (GelMa) hydrogel (Figure 6).[97] A fibrous elastic scaffold was firstly prepared with dry spinning of P4HB in random and aligned manner which had uniform and anisotropic mechanical properties, respectively. Then GelMa was introduced into the fibrous P4HB scaffold to provide a hospitable environment for cell growth. Cells encapsulated in the hybrid scaffold showed more uniform distribution compared to the cells directly seeded onto P4HB scaffold. In vivo delivery of MSCs and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) using the hybrid scaffold on sheep pulmonary artery enabled the tissue formation throughout the scaffold and prevented the surface thrombosis. This was attributed to the compatible environment provided by the GelMa hydrogel encapsulation, as well as the mechanical support by P4HB fibrous scaffold under physiological pressure in vivo. Other potential strategies via decellularized vascular structures without pre-seeding of stem cells are also proved to be efficient to induce vascularization which is beyond the scope of this review.[98]
Despite the achievements in preclinical studies, few clinical trials were carried involving biomaterials delivery system for stem cells therapy (Table 2).[99] Therefore, more work is required to further evaluate and translate the developed functional biomaterials to provide new options for cardiovascular regeneration to fulfill the bench-to-bedside approach.
Biomaterials for Stem Cell Delivery in Neruoregeneration
Damages to the brain, the spinal cord and the peripheral nerves due to traumatic injuries, stroke, tumor, infection or neurodegenerative diseases are often permanent and incapacitating, presenting tremendous burden on the patients, their families and society. The adult nervous system, especially the central nervous system (CNS), has limited capability to regenerate to establish the correct axonal and dendritic connections.[100] Instead, a cascade of events happen as a consequence of damages, including the production of glial scar, which represents a molecular and physical barrier to regeneration, leading to neuronal degeneration and cell death.[101] Current clinical treatments are designed to pharmacologically improve the disease symptoms in combination with rehabilitation activities to restore physical function to some extent; however, no therapies are yet available to fully restore lost functions or slow ongoing neurodegeneration following the injury or disease.[102] It has been recognized that the failure of neurons to regenerate was not an intrinsic deficit of the neuron, but rather a characteristic feature of the damaged environment that either did not support or prevented regeneration.[101] Therefore, strategies aim to fully regenerate the damaged nerves should not only focus on supplying the cells lost due to injury or disease to re-establish the connections, but also improving the local environment to support regeneration and prevent further degeneration.
Stem cells have great promise as a source for introducing new neurons or glial cells to the damaged nervous system. For instance, neural stem/progenitor cells (NS/PCs) can be isolated from the mammalian neonatal CNS,[103] or derived from pluripotent stem cells such as ESCs and iPSCs,[104] which can in turn be differentiated into neurons and glia cells of the nervous system when delivered to the damaged regions. In addition, NS/PCs can also modulate immune and inflammatory responses, leading to neuroprotective effect to the surrounding tissues.[105] Clinical trials of allogenic NS/PCs transplantation to patients with ALS,[106] stroke,[107] and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD)[108] have found consistently favorable safety profile during early phase trials. Other cell types, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are also investigated by researchers preclinically[109] and clinically[110] for their ability to facilitate neuroregeneration via paracrine actions of neural protection, plasticity, antiinflammation, and angiogenesis, rather than direct transdifferentiating into neural cells.[111]
Advanced biomaterials can provide a structural platform to bridge the gap of damaged neural tissue, deliver stem cells to the site of injury, enable and augment the targeted delivery of therapeutic molecules, and help rebuild damaged circuits and repair damaged neuronal pathways.[102b, 112] In a 2016 meta-analysis of preclinical studies using NSPC transplantation for spinal cord injury treatment, it was found that scaffold use in NSPC transplantation effectively raise functional recovery comparing to scaffold-free cell suspension.[113] The ideal materials for neural regeneration should be biocompatible with low immunogenicity, mechano-compatible to provide structural support to the surrounding neural tissue, and encouraging stem cell survival, differentiation and integration.[102b, 114] In this section, we highlight some of our colleagues' recent work of neuroregeneration in the brain, the spinal cord and the peripheral nerves (Table 3) that utilized advanced biomaterial-assisted stem cell delivery strategies to regenerate neural tissues.
Regenerate the Brain Tissues
Stem or progenitor cell transplantation after brain damage due to ischemic stroke or traumatic injury was shown to promote neuro-regeneration in pre-clinical models.[115] Early-phase clinical studies to evaluate the intracerebral transplantation of allogenic human neural stem cells (NSCs)[107] and MSCs[116] have also demonstrated promising safety profiles in stroke patients. However, these studies are limited by poor survival of the transplant when administered as a suspended form into the damaged brain, most likely due to the ischemic and pro-inflammatory environment, the immunological attack and the abrupt withdrawal of growth factor and adhesive support.[114] To solve this problem, biomaterial scaffolds can serve as delivery vehicles for transplanted cells, facilitating neuronal outgrowth and connectivity between grafted and host cells. Moreover, the scaffolds can be modified to provide local and sustained delivery of proteins, and the surface can be topographically altered to form alignment, coated with ligands or modified to possess a surface charge to promote attachment, growth and differentiation of neural stem cells.[102b]
Some earlier works used porous biodegradable polymers such as polyglycolic acid (PGA) as cell-seeding scaffolds, which supported new brain tissue regeneration around the degenerating scaffold and formed a network of neurites with axonal regeneration.[117] However, the transplantation of cell seeded polymer scaffold requires invasive surgical procedures, which may cause further damage to the vulnerable brain tissue. Alternatively, hydrogels containing ECM proteins such as collagen, laminin and fibronectin could be injected with stem cells to allow minimally invasive cell delivery.[118] The ECM-based scaffolds were found to significantly improve cell survival rate comparing to cells in suspension by many groups.[119] However, the xenogeneic nature of ECM-based scaffolds and the potential immune response to the antigenic components of xenogeneic materials represent a critical barrier to the use of xenogeneic scaffolds in translational applications.[120] Synthetic ECM-derived peptides, such as laminin-derived IKVAV and fibronectin-derived RGD could be used to form ECM-memetic hydrogels by self-assembly[121] or incorporation with other biopolymer materials (e.g. hyaluronic acid[122] and alginate[123]) to allow effective delivery and differentiation of stem cells to the brain, without the use of xenogeneic materials.
Engineering strategies can further encourage the migration, survival and differentiation of NS/PCs by promoting a stem cell niche-like environment that helps rebuild a functional neuronal network. As an example, the Segura group has engineered a series of hyaluronic acid (HA) based hydrogels with various peptide modifications.[122, 124] Their initial delivery of iPS-NPCs to the stroke cavity within the HA based matrix modified with RGD and MMP sensitive peptide promoted the differentiation of transplanted cells; however, the material did not significantly promote stem cell survival.[122a] To improve stem cell survival, the group utilized the Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology to optimize the concentrations of three ECM ligands (RGD, YIGSR, IKVAV) in vitro for the survival and differentiation of NPCs by determining the individual and combinatorial effects of each factor on cell activity.[124] Further DOE optimization and modification was carried out combining mechanical, biochemical and trophic factors, and a later animal study using the systematically optimized HA hydrogel resulted in selective control of human neural stem cell survival and differentiation after transplantation in the stroke brain[122b] (Figure 7A). Moreover, the HA hydrogel can be tracked in vivo with MRI, enabling non-invasive tracking for material distribution and degradation. Recent work from the same group also focuses on cell-free approach of brain tissue regeneration after stroke by promoting vascularization and reducing inflammation, which is beyond the scope of this review.[125]
Cite this page
Stem Cell Delivery in Regenerative Engineering and Medicine. (2019, Jun 19).
Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/06/page/13/