How did People Avoid Removal during the Holocaust?

Jewish people Anne Frank and her family Christians or normal citizens helping people hide Mykola and Maria Dyuk helped hide people Renee Roth and her sisters hid in a convent People who were hiding Jewsish `peopls WHAT? (What happened?) During the holocaust the Nazi made it thier goal to wipe out the Jewish race. Many Jews went into hiding to avoid removal, they did not just hide physically but many hid in plain sight as Christians. They hid in cellars, pits, attics, and convents. If they did not go into hiding many would be deported to concentration camps where they would most likely die of illness, hunger, dehydration, or torture.

While in hiding there was consentent fear of being found but also it was hard because you could not speak, or be loud. You most likely not get a lot of food because the people you are hiding may not have it or there was a huge food shortage. Anne Frank had it of extemely lucky while in hiding because she had her own space while many people lived with there whole family in a 4ft by 4ft atic that is suspetible to weather, WHEN? (When did it take place?) Sep 1, 1941 – May 8, 1945.In the summer of 1943 a secret organization was created to help people in hiding. WHERE? (Where did it take place?) This took place mostly in Europe, in Germany, The Netherlands, France, Poland, and many more places. But it also took place around the world. Many places where people were hiding was in attics, cellars, pits, underground, or under a different religon, WHY? (Why did it happen?) World war two happend because Hitler believd that the Jews should be blamed for Germans politcal instabilty and econmic woes. He gained a larger following making him gain more power and the Nazis tried to wipe the Jews out.

This caused Jewsish people to hide so they would not be killed. HOW? (How did it happen?) There were organzations to help people hide. They hid in cellars,pits, attics, false walls, and other creative hiding places. They also hid under differnt religions so they would not get caught, Finally some people tried to escape Europe and go to the U.S but this rarely worked because of all the security. MESSAGE What do you think is the important message or take away that you want to share after completing your research? I think the main message that I gained after completing my research it that just because somebody has a differnt race/religon than you does not give you the right to take away their freedom or religon. Also, people who hid anybody during the holocasut are true heros because they saved many people lives. 16,000 Jews were not killed in the Netherlands because those wonderful people had the courage to hide them. 

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

How Did People Avoid Removal During the Holocaust?. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Holocaust’s Destruction

Relationship, it means two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. The story Night by Elie Wiesel is an autobiography about a young boy named Elie and his father surviving the holocaust. Elie has a exclusive relationship with both his father and god that change throughout the story, but they change differently .The rocky relationship with his father has events that that go from being inseparable in Birkenau, to feeling as though he is a burden, but with god he struggles with his faith as his time in the camps worsen, but towards the beginning his devotion with God was strong.

Before Elie and his father got sent to camp, their relationship was distant while his relationship with God was one of devotion. As it was described in the first pages of the story, Elie wanted the audience to know what the relationship was like before the camps: “ My father was a cultured man, rather unsentimental. He rarely displayed his feelings, not even with his own family, and was more involved with the welfare of others than that of his own kin” (Wiesel 4). Many children in this time period often felt as though their parents were not able to provide emotional support. Elie clearly felt this, and did not appear to have a particularly strong bond with his father. Instead, he felt devoted and connected to God. Elie wished to spend his life focused around Judaism and devoted all his free time and energy on religious studies. With Moishe’s guidance, they would read the same pages of the Zohar over and over. At one point Elie states, “ Moishe the Beadle , the poorest of the poor of Sighet, spoke to me for hours on end about Kabbalah’s revelations and its mysteries. Thus began my initiation. Together we would read, over and over again, the same page of Zohar. Not to learn it by heart but to discover within the very essence of divinity” (Weisel 15). Elie believed that religion was a basic survival need, showing that he followed his religion instinctively.

As the story moves on, the relationship between Elie and his father and between Elie and God changed dramatically. During Elie’s time in the camp the relationship that he has with his father change very quickly. When Elie and his father arrived at their first concentration camp, in Auschwitz. Elie was very scared and the only person that he knows is his father. “ My hands…(30). From the beginning times in camps Elie and his father find great comfort in the being physically for each other, clearly their bond strengthens. The bond between Elie and his father does strengthen: ""And what if he were dead, as well? He was not moving. Suddenly the evidence overwhelmed me: there is no longer any reason to live, any reason to fight"" (Wiesel 98-99). Elie reveals that he truly depends on his father for survival, because if his father is no longer alive, he loses all hope for survival. It almost seems that his relationship grows with his father almost to the point that up until half way into the story his father basically could replace God in his life. His father is all that he needs to survive and what keeps him going, much like faith does for the people around him. While in the concentration camps. Elie’s devotion towards god dramatically falls. As the first nightmarish night in the concentration camp unfolded, Elie as a person was changed. His beliefs became different and he was no longer able to see the world in the same light, as expressed ""Never shall I forget that night, the first night in camp, which has turned my life into one long night, seven times cursed and seven times sealed....Never shall I forget those moments which murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to dust. Never shall I forget these things, even if I am condemned to live as long as God Himself. Never""(Wiesel 32). Elie redefines the position God holds in his life. Elie sees that the Holocaust highlights the evil and cruelty from everybody. Not only by the Nazis, but from the other prisoners, his fellow Jews, even himself. He feels that if the world is so awful and cruel than God either must be awful and cruel or not exist altogether. “ I no longer accepted God’s silence. As I swallowed my bowl of soup, I saw in the gesture an act of Rebellion and protest against him” (wiesel 76). From this, Elie feels that he is better off alone in a world without God and man.

Near the end of Elie’s time in the concentration camp his relationship with his father gets the turn for the worst. At one point the doctor was trying to explain to Elie that his father is holding him back: “Listen to me, kid. Don’t forget that you are in a concentration camp. In this place, it is every man for himself, and you can not think of others. Not even your father. In this place, there is no such thing as father, brother, friend. Each of us lives and dies alone. Let me give you good advice: stop giving your ration of bread and soup to your old father. You cannot help him anymore. And you are hurting yourself. In fact, you should be getting his rations…’ He was right, I thought deep down, not daring to admit it to myself. Too late to save your old father… You could have two rations of bread, two rations of soup… It was only a fraction of a second, but it left me feeling guilty.” (Wiesel 111). Elie had finally realized that in order to survive he needs to stop taking care of him. He know that his father is going to die anyways, and knows that he shouldn’t waste precious resources on him. The concentration had mentally destroyed him. An example of that was when his father is struck and Elie does nothing to help him, Elie said: “My father had just been struck, in front of me, and I had not even blinked. I had watched and kept silent.” He moves from apathetic to complete contempt for his father in a matter of months to the point where his talk about his father’s death near the end is emotionless: “I woke up at dawn on January 29. On my father's cot there lay another sick person. They must have taken him away before daybreak and taken him to the crematorium. Perhaps he was still breathing.… No prayers were said over his tomb. No candle lit in his memory. His last word had been my name. He had called out to me and I had not answered. I did not weep, and it pained me that I could not weep. But I was out of tears. And deep inside me, if I could have searched the recesses of my feeble conscience, I might have found something like: Free at last!”( Wiesel 112).

In Night, Wiesel’s relationship with God and his father had and downs, which ultimately changes his views about God and his relationship with his father. Before the concentration camps, Wiesel shows his strong devotion to God, but with his father he did not have a good relationship. but as he personally experiences the Holocaust, Wiesel becomes uncertain of his religious beliefs with god and had a stronger bond towards his father. While Wiesel grows and transforms into a man, he simultaneously redefines God’s position in his life, and with his father he start to realize that he can not live much longer if he is going to continue to take care of his father. With Wiesel, being a author and the main character of the story, surfeits many examples of the mental and physical effects of people in the Holocaust and more specifically for a young boy. For this reason, Night provides a deeper understanding of the Holocaust so that with a better understanding of such a horrific event, history doesn't repeat itself.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Holocaust's Destruction. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Leon’s Holocaust

Leon's father has been saving up for a long time for his family to move in with him. When he earned enough money from his well paying job, the family bought a super tiny apartment and moved in with their two parents, one sister, and 4 boy family. With an already scarce amount of food and water, the family had to do everything they could to find money, food, and even a job. The InvasionThen it happened, the Germans came and took over everything. Before, Leon made friends with other boys that weren't even Jewish like him. But, after the Germans came, they abandoned Leon only because he was Jewish. The Jews that were about 10 years and older, had to wear a sleeve with the sign of David on it. But, Leon never wore that sleeve, and it could have cost his life. Now and then, I would sit on a park bench just to prove I could do what I wanted, resisting the Nazis in my own small way, Leon saidIt was a hard time for Leon and his family because they had to make the decision for Leon's older brother to go back to their old village, with his girlfriend.

Leon was devastated. His brother was his best friend, yet he would most likely never see him again. After a little while of the Germans take over, the Jews had to move out and move into an enclosed community and were forced to do hard labor. But, the only people that didn't have to go, were the special few on Schindler's list. Schindler's list basically includes a few lucky people that Schindler (a German man himself but who believes in Jew's rights) choose to save from death because they were good enough to keep alive only to do work.So, because Leon's father was a very skilled glass worker, their family got spared to be on Schindler's list. Leon thought he was safe, his parents thought they were safe. But, that wasn't the case. You can NEVER be safe when your being taken over by the Germans (and especially when they can do whatever they want to you). But, then the German's barged in and took Leon's older brother, for no reason at all. They took him away, and Leon knew that would be the last time he saw his best friend. His brother.

Hiding

After that, Leon and his family knew they had to hide. So, while all the Jews were moving out, Leon, his mother, and their next-door neighbor and son devised a plan. To hide. So they found a cellar to hide in for two or three days straight. Without food or even water. After the hiding though, Leon knew they wouldn't get by that easily. Only about 1,098 Jews were on Schindler's list in the camp. When it was time for them to leave for work, the family moved into an even smaller apartment shared with even more people.

Schindler's list

Work to DIE forOnce they started working for Schindler, it wasn't all fun and games. It was very hard work and everyone only get one meal a day, disgusting soup. And often enough, Leon had to sneak out and find food in the trash cans, and around the ground. But, since the kitchen workers were Jews as well and while Leon got to know them, when it came to lunch time, Leon always got a little extra food. During work though, Leon and along with everyone else never knew what would happen. Sometimes, a German man named Amon Goeth (who is the boss of Schindler and has complete control of the business) came in and kept a close eyes on the Jews. But the worst part was that he could do anything he wanted, even if that meant killing the Jews, just for fun and game. And nobody dared to stop him. Once, Amon came when Leon was doing work with the snow, he came and made his men take all if the Jews and hit them with leather whips. As the whips came, the Jews were made to call out the number of whips, and if they didn't the whips started over again from one to 25. Although I was numb from the cold, the pain seared through me each time, like being branded by a poker.

Leon said putting in his opinion. Whenever he went to Leon's working space, Leon got all stiff and scared, especially because he saw Goeth come in one day and take a couple of Jews out with a gun, and those two Jews had no idea he was there. He seemed to thrive on inflicting agony on on the helpless. Leon wrote. But, there was one sort of encouraging thing, whenever Schindler came in, he went up to Leon and talked with him. (considering Leon was one of the youngest Jews on his list) While Leon stood on his little wooden box to give him a boost, they talked for a while. Yet, with all the hard labor work, it didn't make it the tiniest bit easier for Leon.At night, Leon and his family were separated and couldn't sleep in the same place. So, a couple times Leon snuck out to try and find his father and brother first. It took him awhile, but Leon was finally able to find them. But, Leon had to be really stealthy, because if Goeth ever found out or saw it, he would've killed Leon right away and not regret anything. He also tried to find his mother, with the same circumstances. I was so small and thin, and my hair was so shaggy, I could pass for a girl; I knew I would be severely punished if I were discovered.

Leon wrote when he tried sneaking into the women's bunker to try and find his mom. While the war was coming to an end, Leon always keep the thought in his head that he was going to be killed by the very last bullet in the war. And that thought stuck in his mind throughout the whole holocaust. But that wasn't the case because Leon survived to tell the story.Leon changed his name from Leib Lezjon to Leon when he came to America, but on Schindler's list, he was known as Leib Lezjon, with the rest of the Lezjons. Free at last!When the war finally ended, Leon, his mom, dad, brother and sister then traveled to America for a brighter future. Leon was still young then so he still went to school. Leon then graduated with a teacher's license and taught high school kids. Eventually Leon got married, had kids, became an uncle, and soon a grandfather.When Leon's family first made it to America, Leon tried to tell his experiences during the holocaust, but nobody would ever listen. So he keep his experience to himself. But, after a slight interview with the newspaper, everyone soon knew Leon's story and wanted him to show up to events for speeches, and people even wanted autographs. And one fun fact was that whenever Leon gave his speeches, he never read off a script, it was all improvised.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Leon's Holocaust. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Holocaust: Prejudice, Hatred, and Discrimination

I am so excited to share my personal perspective on a topic so closely held to my Jewish Heritage. Growing up as an observant Jew I was taught about so many historical events that go back thousands of years.

Amongst them, the Holocaust resonates in my mind as an event that I feel as a Jew, I need to understand. I continue to go back to 1933 when the onset of the Holocaust in Europe began, and had continued through 1945, taking roughly 8.5 million lives, including roughly 6 million Jewish Lives. The holocaust is thought of only being a tragedy of where people were murdered in concentration camps but the holocaust has more to its story than that. It seems to me to truly understand what the conditions were during the horrific time you need to experience it first hand. That being said, I had traveled back in time to 1933 when I had the privilege of personally getting to know many faces and voices of the holocaust. To set the stage let me share some insight into the state of Chaos of the Holocaust through my readings of Ms. Sally Rogow, an esteemed Professor at the University of British Columbia.

According to Sally Rogow, author of Child Victims in Nazi Germany, In the beginning of the worst thing that many people experienced in their lifetime reality began to change before their eyes. The popular schools, hospitals and institutions were changed from a reputable place to a place of destruction and the unknown. During the first period of change children specifically were isolated for their differences whether they had disabilities, had emotional problems or were orphans and were forced into institutions. Children were given impassable tests in school and when they failed they were considered hopeless cases and were sent away like the other children. The parents who opposed the idea of their child being taken away were threatened to lose guardianship.

Ms. Rogow emphasized the absurd conditions by not leaving out detail. Rogow mentions in her writing when Jewish caregivers were dismissed there was a budget decrease and overcrowding became a large issue, one physician could be responsible for 400 to 500 patients. Also, after the professional nurses were dismissed women Nazis with no experience in child care took their place and did as they were told. Next, children were constantly being moved from institution to institution without parental knowledge or consent. In my opinion, things became most inhumane during this fiasco when children were being used for medical experiments. Special needs children who had mental and physical disabilities were used as lab rats. They had blood and spinal floods drawn and replaced with air so they could take clear x-rays of their brains then they'd inject them with different substance to see the reaction. Later their organs were sold for research after they were killed. In addition, Hitler gave the okay for physicians to kill children so it became a game since they knew they'd get a bonus. After gas chambers were created 3000 to 4000 lives were saved when the physicians gave false reports about the patients by labeling them able to work the people that were labeled fit to work were hidden the days the busses were in transit. Postwar persons involved with killings resumed their jobs like nothing happened.

The first person I met was six-year-old Thomas Buergenthal, he was forced to leave his home and adapt to his new environment Kielce, Poland widely known as a ghetto.

Me: How were you able to survive the trauma and conditions, what happened to those less fortunate?

Thomas: I had convinced the Nazi's that I was able to work a variety of jobs. For those the less fortunate children were isolated from the rest of us for a period of time and then were taken away to a Jewish Cemetery and killed

After I left Thomas in Poland I allowed myself time to reflect on his experience and balance my emotions. I had immediately begun further research as I continued my journey.

I was very fortunate to meet with Ursula Rosenfeld, a thirteen-year-old Jewish Public School student. I had come to learn that Ursula had first hand knowledge and experiences of Kristallnacht.

Me: Ursula what had happened to create such a level of dissent for Jews in the community, and how to it spread so rapidly?

Ursula: Prior to the Holocaust various denominations of German students had attended public schools cohesively without any animosity. That was until the Nazi's had infiltrated and influenced local politicians opinions of Jews. This had created considerable hatred, violence and separation of the classes (denominations). Shortly there after, the events have escalated to a period of absolute chaos and desperation. Simply put, those of us who were deemed intelligent and capable had managed to survive.

Me: Can you share your experiences you've had with your peers since the turmoil began?

Ursula: Yes, I was verbally assaulted by peers specifically based off of my religion. As fellow peers watched a local synagogue burn one made a comment saying, oh there's a Jew, let's throw her on fire as well

My interview with Ursula had me thinking about how did the parents plan for the safety of their children during this time period.

As the intensity of the war picked up many parents made the impulse decision to send their children away to ensure their safety. Two days before Britain entered WWII 10,000 children were moved out of Nazi invaded countries to Britain. Once the children reached their destination of London they were either placed in a sponsor home or at a vacation camp called Dovercourt Bay. Although being in an actual home seems more glamorous and reality friendly at times it could have been a toxic environment. Its been documented by survivors that sometimes relationships were never meshed together or the children were overworked.

The next person I'd like to introduce to you is a survivor who was hidden after her parents made the decision to send her away at nine months old, it's a pleasure for me to share my interview I had with Aviva Sleslin.

Me: Aviva can you please express the feeling you possess after you've realized you survived?

Aviva: I believe we were lucky. Our childhoods were blessed with great rescuers who showed us in humanity there's still good when there's a lot of evil, and held courage for us during the unknown and great losses.

I had paused from interviewing and resumed my research. I was sickened to learn that many families were forced to abandon their religious identity and blend with the rest of the community in order to escape the outcome of concentration camps.

By 1939 many people were forced from their homes and moved to in ghettos. Ghettos were designated areas where Jewish people were forced to live. Conditions were terrible it was overcrowded, unsanitary, disease spread fast and many people faced starvation. Ghettos were controlled by most unmerciful private police force, originally formed as security for Hitler, the schutzstaffel. The identities of holocaust prisoners at Auschwitz that were capable to work were stripped away from them when their heads were shaved, they were given rubbish clothes and had a number tattooed on their arm to replace who they were entirely. In addition, they were overworked and starved to the point of where they resembled skeletons. Holocaust survivors saw the light at the end of the tunnel when American troops liberated the camps April 1945 and left by June 1945

American troops were astounded by the conditions the kids were in. The commander of the American troops sent a message to the children's rescue group asking for help in evacuating the children As result of the trips being upset by the conditions of the children they tried to nourish them as fast and as much as possible. Although it was a nice gesture their bodies couldn't handle the rich foods and it caused them to be sick and caused some to die. Inevitably after being in the conditions they were in and experiencing scarring events children had a hard time adjusting back to normal life. They had a hard time disassociating adults as enemies and rarely spoke to outsiders. They wanted to get away from where they were. When they wrote about their experience they wrote about the emotions and actions of other peoples over theirs, and similarly all children wrote about lost loved ones.

Once again resuming my interviews the next person I spoke to was Elizabeth Zadek who had a close relationship with children recovering from the holocaust at the Lingfield house located near London.

Me: How would you describe the children's mentality after they left the concentration camps?

Elizabeth: The children appeared mature and from the bitter experience they lost trustfulness and faith of the child.

While I learned a lot and enjoyed all of the interviews that I was fortunate enough to complete, my last interview will leave me with everlasting memories of the struggles during the Holocaust period. I had the rare opportunity to interview 15-year-old Anne Frank.

Me: Would you mind sharing some background on your experience through the Holocaust?

Anne: During the holocaust my family felt safe at first, we were tucked away in an annex behind my fathers business, it was only accessible through the inside. We often depended on outside sources for our information on the conditions of society, and I wrote all of my experiences down in my diary until Nazis took my family.

Me: Where to you relocate to after leaving Germany? How old were you.

Anne: My family relocated to Amsterdam when I was 4 years old because we thought since it wasn't taken over by Nazis we were safe.

In my opinion, there will always be various levels of prejudice, hatred, and discrimination, its unfortunate how some sectors and cultures are wired. As I consider what I've read and thought through my interviews I realized that we have to even more so prevent that catastrophic events from occurring again by never forgetting.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Holocaust: Prejudice, Hatred, and Discrimination. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

To what Extent did German Jews have a Sufficient Warning of the Holocaust

"Prior to the events of the Holocaust there is an issue of whether or not German Jews had the chance to escape and/or avoid the mass genocide of the Holocaust Adolf Hitler had instigated; this brings a debate if there was a clear indication if this event was going to happen. In this case it is the argument of 'To what extent did German Jews have a sufficient warning of the Holocaust?'. A sufficient warning is any clear indication of Hitler exploiting his plans of annihilation to all German Jews leading up to the Holocaust. The identification of enlarged or significant signs for an advancement of genocide against jews was not essentially provocative, however, there were minor indications of an advancement in the pursuit of a holocaust.

For the argument in defense to German Jews, Hitler was not a popular leader in the beginning, so this led to assumption of him being a temporary leader and in this case not taken seriously at the time. It wasn't until his power had led to such brutality had it only then become an actual issue. The severity of Hitler's reign was not noticed until his initial plan to rid of the Jews was taken place, so by this time it was already too late, the camps have already been created and German Jews were trapped. The main cause of there not being an actual threat was not only due to Hitler's unclear message, but he had not possessed a new and profound idea with strong hatred towards this race. German Jews had been accustomed to living in a hostile environment with Germans who already viewed them with prejudice in accordance to their different race and religion. Segregation and being forced to wear the star of David had not been a huge flag or warning sufficient enough for the German Jews to leave in time before the Holocaust had begun.

However, those who had wanted a secure or better life could not leave after 1941, this was due to rights being stripped away including the freedom to emigrate Germany. Those who had chosen to stay later had attributed that decision to the variety of reasons including: lack of reliable information, mixed messages from Nazi parties versus gentile Germans, the desire to remain optimistic or even the personal attachment of fatherland. In retrospect, Hitler's power in 1933 had been slow and not particularly alarming enough, which concludes the reasoning of overlooking his influence. There was no clear message given the problem of groups anti-Jewish that brought hostility or friendly neighbors who had no problems towards jews. As well as a slow growth in Hitler's influence as a leader quickly changed into events leading up to the Holocaust being suddenly a reality; being that the Jews had no idea of their violent fate, they were surprised by such subtle racial changes turned into a malicious act to rid their very existence.

Regardless of the German Jews defense, Hitler had made clear indications of his proposal of placing the blame upon them. Although his intentions had been contradicting, he was capable of using his influence to convince a particular race was reasoning behind Germany's misfortune at that time. It was his purpose to have consolidation of power, it may not be morally justifiable, but it was the beginning of small indications that had led towards a sufficient warning. Hitler may have been contradicting in his message but his idea of ridding the Jews from Germany was not established overnight. This furthermore brings the point of being a warning since the Jews living in fear because of the condition of hiding and enduring the temporary aberration, in this case the camps. Hitler had been clear with his intentions from the beginning it was just a matter of time whether or not others would join him. He used speeches to convince Germans the logical hatred towards Jews, it only made the hostile environment grow but Jews having been forced to live in. They are given the opportunity to believe that it was not a temporary situation. Rather this problem is growing worse and it was time to leave or make a change. Being that the misfortune of not foreseeing this would happen was because lack of identifying the signs that Hitler's action towards Jews was not to be taken lightly and overlooked.

Although there was small indications of the Holocaust becoming a reality for German Jews, there had been no sufficient warning that was clear enough to show Hitler's intent for a mass genocide. Yet the arguable topic has been proved that even if there had been a large enough indication of such an event, the German Jews were incapable of leaving Germany or escaping prior to the Holocaust. This had not only been from their decision to stay but those who wanted to emigrate were forced to continue living in Germany after 1941; not due to fear but because their rights had been taken. This concludes that through segregation, the required rule to wear a symbol of their faith and even being temporarily aberrated, it was not enough to declare a sufficient warning from Hitler of there being a Holocaust. However, the provocative decisions Hitler had made created fear and confusion leading to events that caused a more virulent affect. Including his influence of the Nazi party, his control and consolidation of power was a strong and effective tactic but not enough to specifically claim the Jews would endure a mass genocide.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

To What Extent Did German Jews Have a Sufficient Warning of the Holocaust. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Holocaust – very Important Event in Human History

This historical event was very depressing and a very scary moment to many people especially at that day. At this time in 1945, many of the Jews or people with Jewish feature were the ones who were being targeted at these camps. They were the ones who were being sent to these places known as concentration camps which were very cruel. These Concentration camps were basically death for most Jews, but in this time they were being sent there they and they did not know they were going to eventually get killed or enslaved. Many Parents, children, and friends were all sent to these concentration camps to be put to work as slaves. Every single day day in that time period Jews would either get beaten or killed from the people who ran the camps also known as hitler.

In the novel I read called "Night" is a about a boys life and his family getting sent to concentration camps because they were Jewish or had Jewish features. In the book its talks about every thing that happen to his father, and many other Jews because they didn't believe in what Hitler believed in. The things they would do to the Jews were so disgusting you can't even picture it with gout getting shivers down your spine. This book explains everything that would of or happened to these Jews during this time. The Holocaust was ran by a evil man named Hitler. He was a very scary man and he did a very disgusting thing to many people.

Hitler killed over six-million Jews, because he wanted only one religion. When Hitler order his army to kill the Jews he would act as if they were gonna give the Jews a shower in one room, but they would actually were gassing them without them knowing and killing them all in the same room. They would also burn the Jews in fire god knows why, and their ashes would always be floating in the air around the camps. We do not want this event in history to ever be repeated ever again. It was very scary, cruel, and highly inhuman.

The Holocaust is a very important human event to know and so many people should be aware about it and always tell someone who doesn't know about it to them because they are lucky they are living in a world that is well past that. This event should never be forgotten. Know one should ever judge a person by their race or religion or color, but sadly that's happening with colleges and there acceptance because everything's about diversity now. The Holocaust is important and everyone should know about it and always remember what happened to those who died and to those who lost there family.

This moment in time is well over and past thankfully and I hope it never repeats itself again. Even though my family is not Jewish I still can't even think how hard it was for the families who had Jewish family members. I think everyone over the age of twelve years old should start learning about the times when Hitler was a dictator due to graphics and things that happened, because most kids are not mature until twelve years old. To all the people who lost friends and family Rest In Peace.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Holocaust - Very Important Event in Human History. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Propaganda and its Appearance in the Holocaust

Propaganda is advertisement that is used to promote biased political views and ideas. Propaganda is most popular and commonly known for its use in World War II and the Holocaust by Hitler and the Nazis. During the war Hitler used propaganda to get more people to believe in his message and to get people to join him and the Nazis. Propaganda was shown in many different ways during World War II from videos, posters, cartoons, radio, books, and even movies. Even though propaganda could have some truth within it, propaganda was a very biased way of advertising the political views of the Nazis, and sent out the wrong message that was often misleading.

The purpose of propaganda during the Holocaust and World War II by Hitler and the Nazis was to promote and spread their political ideas and message to gain the support from many Germans. Hitler wanted to shape and change the Germans public opinion and behavior towards Jews and anyone who was not like them. To be able to do that, Hitler knew he needed to establish a good and engaging connection with those of the German community to really make it work. The Nazis were able to use propaganda to make what they were doing look like an amazing thing. They would hide the actual truth from the German public and twist it to hide the fact of the horrible things that they were doing to the Jewish community. Hitler would use propaganda in an appealing and relatable way to help target his audience better. By using movies, posters, etc. the German people would see it in their everyday lives and find it relatable. Hitler created a symbol for his campaign, the Swastika, this was even used as a propaganda tool because, for the people who supported him it gave them something to wear and show that they were with him. The purpose of this piece of propaganda was to have something for people so they could feel a part of his army and get more attention drawn to his campaign. Other forms of propaganda were very successful and useful to Hitler much like the Swastika such as the film Triumph of the Will. In the propaganda film Triumph of the Will that was released in 1935 it portrays the Nazi army and Hitler as open and approachable people. They were shown shaking hands with people and appearing very happy. The film showed scenes of people of all ages, including children, showing their support for the Nazis and their message. This movie was used to show the German people that many people just like them were supporting the Nazi troops and portrayed supporting it as a celebration. Hitler was shown also giving speeches and during the movie and you can hear the roaring of the crowds showing their support. This movie alone prompted many people to stand with Hitler and his army and became one of the most famous propaganda films. Propaganda served the main purpose of winning the support and keeping the support of the German community and changing the public opinion and behavior to that of which Hitler and his army saw fit.

Propaganda is different from opinion. Opinions are a view that you yourself form about something or someone, whereas propaganda is an advertising technique and tool that influences opinions and thoughts on a political topic. Although opinion is often used in propaganda there is a definite difference between the two. Propaganda in Nazi Germany was used to try and persuade the German community to have an anti-Semitism view and opinion. Of course, the Nazi's opinion was put into all of the different forms of propaganda that were used but, it was not all opinion. Because propaganda was used as a way to try and influence opinions, the Nazis propaganda was thought of as something that brainwashed the German people in to conforming to the ideals portrayed in their propaganda. Propaganda is unmoral and unethical. Epically during Nazis Germany, it cannot be used ethically or morally. Propaganda used during the Holocaust and World War II was often negative and hurtful towards Jewish people and other people who did not fit the discerptions of what Hitler defined as a German. It would make people have extreme opinions on those who did not fit in Hitler's idea of a normal German. The propaganda used during this time was full of deception and hurtful lies to achieve Hitler's end goal of his perfect society. It limited and controlled people's ability to form opinions on what they truly believe in. Hitler controlled everything people watched, saw, read, and even heard. Because of that Nazis were able to understand how the German community worked and would then make their propaganda based on what they studied. Hitler looked at the community as numbers he could benefit from and not people and that is just not morally right. Anything used to win or achieve something for personal gain in a hurtful way cannot be defined as something moral or ethical.

In conclusion, propaganda during the Holocaust and World War II was a tool used to spread the biased political ideas and the views of Hitler and the Nazis. Their uses of propaganda had the purpose of making a society act and work as one under Hitler and his dictatorship. There are seven different types of propaganda such as, bandwagon and Plain Folks, and every single one of them were used in someone way in Nazi propaganda. The different uses of propaganda during this time spared nothing and no one to get to the top. No amount of moral or ethical thought went into the making of any of the propaganda seeing as they were full of hatred and lies. Hitler reached his main purpose he was trying to reach with propaganda and that was to influence and change those of the German populations minds to his views. Propaganda corrupted the minds of those in Germany during the time of the Holocaust and helped put Hitler in his dictator position.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Propaganda and Its Appearance in the Holocaust. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Holocaust Museum

As expected, going to the Holocaust Museum was a very emotional experience. I learned about the Holocaust throughout my middle and high school years and it makes me angry and disgusted, but once I saw all the artifacts and pictures of what the Jewish people and their families had to go through I have this indescribable sense of empathy, putting myself in their shoes which gives me a different feeling then of just learning about it from a book or a Powerpoint presentation. Seeing artifacts from the war and concentration camps gave me chills. Going through this Museum makes you think how could one person full of hate could not only get a whole county's support, but their willingness to execute his insanely dark and murderous plan. When I was walking through the museum I decided to talk about the crematorial which they used to dispose of the bodies after they were executed. This gives great insight of this time period by showing us how the Nazis thought that they really were the superior race and that using scientific racism was a justification to their inhumane thoughts and actions. We learn that the people of Germany were so desperate for a leader to bring them out of depression and make them a European or global power again, that they embodied his terrible plans and were willing to execute the Final Solution for him.

When I went to the Museum there were so many moving artifacts to choose from. I was debating on quite a few of them to write about. I ended up choosing the crematorial because I felt like it showed us more of the destruction and intent of the Final Solution than the other artifacts. It was actually in the very last room of the tour so I thought I had already found what I was going to write about, but this really intrigued me because I had never seen one of the things the Nazis used to dispose of the bodies. Throughout school they show pictures of the gas chambers, the work sites, and the awful living spaces for the Jewish people at the camps, but I had never once seen a cermatorial, not even a picture of one. It had its own room and not very many people stopped and looked at it so I decided I would check it out. After reading the short write up on it I knew I wanted to use it for this paper. I think it is something different than a lot of people would choose to do because no one really cares and talks about what happened to the Jewish people after they were killed. I will say it isn't as important to learn about it compared to most things when you are taught about World War II and the Holocaust, but very important and it is symbolic of this time period. This is the final step of the Final Solution so it is important to talk about and should not get left out.

It looks like how you would think a crematorial would look like. It has a big black metal door to it with a handle on. It also has another opening at the bottom of it that is also made out of the black metal which I don't know what the bottom opening is used for. Around the openings is made of red brick. When you look at the picture you can see that there are metal tools that they used when they were disposing of the bodies. You can see blackness all around the red brick from the fire.

In the death camp of Auschwitz there were five different crematoriums that they used to burn the dead bodies. Each of the crematoriums had their own building. Some also had gas chambers connected to them. These Crematoriums were first built in 1939, but there wasn't many of them solely because at that time period the deaths were relatively low compared to what they would become in the upcoming years. The crematoriums used oil to run and were actually built for farmers who needed to burn debris and dead animals. As the number of deaths grew a man by the name of Heinrich Kori made the first permanent crematoria which did not run off oil like the previous one, but it ran off coal. The permanent ones would be put into brick buildings so an accident wouldn't burn down the building. The crematorium buildings would also have a place to store the dead bodies to just lay there until they could be cremated. They were usually built right beside where the Jewish people would sleep so it would be easier to gather them to be executed. If you have ever seen the Boy in the Striped Pajamas the process is the same. They would round everyone up then tell them they are getting to shower so they had to take off all their clothes, then they would lock them in and put the gas on, killing everyone inside. After all that they would cremated the bodies and that was the smoke his father saw at the end of the movie. My artifact was taken from Crematorium V in 1944 when this specific furnace broke down after burning thousands of dead bodies.

The first permanent crematorium was built in 1940 and was used until 1943. According to the Jewish virtual library this crematorium could burn 340 bodies per day. People that were deemed unfit and not healthy would be killed then burned first, and the Polish would be picked out too. There were two rooms in the crematorium that were just for killing people with gas. These rooms were called Bunker no.1 and Bunker no.2. After 1943 they had made countless other crematoriums so they stopped using crematorium I.

Crematorium II-III were even bigger than the first one. According to the Jewish virtual library they could burn 1,440 bodies per day, that is more than 4x as many bodies per day. These buildings also had gas chambers connected to them and were used to kill Jews and some people who weren't Jewish. These crematoriums were used from 1943- 1944. At the end of the war once the Nazis knew the allies were going to find the camps, the officers ordered Crematorium II-V to be destroyed to hide all the evidence.

Crematorium IV-V were smaller than II and III, but bigger than the first one. According to Jewish virtual library it could burn 740 bodies per day, and some ex-Nazis say it could even be more. The Nazi soldiers would make the Jewish people dig pryes and pits next to these two crematoriums and then burn them inside the pits after they were killed in the gas chambers. That seems so messed up to me that they would almost work them to death digging so later they can lay in them dead and then cremated. These two crematoriums were used between the years 1943-1945, and were also destroyed so the Allies couldn't find the evidence of them.

This object gives us insight on how much faith and how much the military personal and the whole country looked up to Hitler and thought he was the country's savior. This country was in a time of misery and economic desperation, and Hitler rose to power and fixed it. Once this happened everyone was brainwashed by Hitler and his ideas and thought because he got them out of the country's worst depression that everything he said and planned was the right thing to do. Being an independent person in this time period was very difficult and most people weren't. If you had ideas that were against Hitler's regime you could be prosecuted or worse, killed. For that reason the majority of people just followed what Hitler said, no questions asked. I'm not saying no one spoke out, but the majority did not either because they were scared or because they truly thought Hitler was the country's savior. This furnace and the crematoriums show us how dark and evil Hitler's Nazi regime really was. They were willing to kill 11 million people because of one man's plans for a better Germany. The military and German people were so brainwashed that they thought all of this evil was acceptable.

This museum was a memory I will have with me for the rest of my life. It showed more of the Jewish peoples' struggles that you can't always invision from a book. My artifact supported how desperate the people of Germany must have been to get out of their depression and how they were dependent on Hitler and believed everything he wanted to do was the right thing to do. Based on the facts and history of the five crematoriums and the amount of people that were killed and then burned in them supports my thesis of the dependency and desperation of the German people.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Holocaust Museum. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Holocaust Depicted through Film “The Pianist”

Because he represents the rest of the world during this time. Not many people, or countries, truly understood what was going on in the concentration camps, or how gruesome they were. Propaganda videos were sent out depicting the camps to be something completely different than they were. In the videos children were seen playing and there is an imaginary caf?©. Of course we know that this is not even close to how terrible life was in the camps.

Bruno is not the only ignorant character, his mother also was not aware of what was really going on inside the camps or farm as Bruno called it. Her husband had kept the secret of the gas chambers from her, which in turn caused her to lose all trust and respect for him. Again, we find ourselves feeling bad for Elsa, but what we don't think about is how much she did know. She was by no means innocent. The mass killings might have been kept from her, but she was well aware of the deportations to the labor camps, and how the prisoners were treated inhumanely. She knew this because she saw it first hand in her own house. She allowed a prisoner names Pavel to work under her roof, and be treated unfairly. If she didn't like what she saw she could have spoken up to her husband about the situation. Her biggest fault was when she accepted and agreed with her husband when he told Bruno they are not real people (The Boy in the Striped Pajamas 2008).

In sharp contrast to The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, The Pianist, is much more autobiographical. We learned that the film's director, Roman Polanski, is a Holocaust survivor himself, which probably helped contribute to the movies historical accuracy. Very early on in the movie we see how brutal the living conditions and treatment are in the Warsaw ghetto. One of the hardest scenes is when we see the ghetto wall being built up and just on the other side of the wall the non-Jews are at the markets buying food and living a normal life. Inside the walls of the ghetto we see famine, and cramped, and inhumane living conditions. Most movies we have seen, and testimonies we have read, have been from the inside the concentration camp fences. The Pianist was able to give us understanding of what life was like in the Ghettos before the Jews were sent off to the camps. I consider this movie to be an accurate display of a time during the Holocaust that is not always discussed. We are able to see Szpilman and the Jews living a somewhat normal life in the opening scene of the film. Then we watch and follow along with them as they begin to understand their fate; from the scene where the family is gathered around listening to the radio and are told they will be relocated to the ghettos, to the scene where they are put into the cattle carts on the way to the actual concentration camps.

I found Szpilmans character to be interesting, he was not a hero by any means or an outsider, he was a survivor and we were able to follow his memoir and see how much luck played a part in his survival. This I found to be a very similar theme to most of the testimonies we read. If you survived, you survived because of luck. However, I did find myself attached to Szpilman's character which made the film ever more difficult to watch. It was hard to watch the dehumanization that played out during the film, of him and is family.

We also were able to get a sense of how historically authentic The Pianist is because of how the film plays out in perfect chronological order. We are shown dates at the bottom of the screen to better understand at what time frame during the war the scene took place. Szpielman never had a flashback scene and we mostly see what he sees through his own eyes. We are also shown that not every Jew was perfect. For example, Itzak was a Jewish policeman who was very brutal with fellow Jews when he did not need to be. This was the reality in the ghettos, and from what we have read in previous testimonies, in the concentration camps as well. We saw fighting, stealing, and the smuggling of food. Children would even crawl through the gutters to smuggle food into the ghetto. There was a scene of a little boy stuck between the ghetto and the other side of the wall and he was brutally beaten to death over a small portion of food he had stolen. It was the scenes like this one that really gave viewers like myself a better understanding of what the circumstances were really like in Warsaw. Another particularly gruesome scene was when Szpielman and his family witnessed, from their kitchen window, Nazis march into a Jewish home, make the entire family stand, and when a man in a wheelchair did not stand they tossed him over the balcony to his death. Scenes like this one showed the audience just how horrible living in the ghetto really was. Another particularily horrific scene took place while Szpilman and his family waited in the courtyard to be deported. A woman near them was screaming, Why did I do it? Why did I do it? (The Pianist). The family learned that the poor mother had smothered her own child out of fear that the Nazis would have heard its cries and killed it. The unimaginable crime of a mother killing her own child does not seem true, but the sad reality was it happened all the time.

It is nearly impossible to compare the film The Boy in the Striped Pajamas to the film The Pianist however, both films explore the context of family during the Holocaust. I found myself thinking, while watching The Boy in the Striped Pajamas for the first time, that the film was over exaggerated by Hollywood, and that it would not fulfill the expectations of someone who is as fascinated with the history of the Holocaust as I am. After watching the film twice more I have a different understanding and appreciation for the film. While not historically accurate, it still gets the viewers thinking about the Holocaust and it does leave a lasting impression on us. During my first time watching The Pianist I had a much different opinion than I do now. I originally thought the film was maybe too historically accurate, if that is even possible. I found myself shielding my eyes from the graphic scenes and stopping the film every once in a while. Now, I realize and can appreciate how important it is to see a film like this one. Together, both films are part of a large genre of Holocaust representations that speaks to its twentieth century viewers and gives us a purpose, as viewers. It is important that viewers see both of these films in order to ensure that a horrific genocide, like the Holocaust, never happens again. Holocaust survivors unfortunately will not live forever, so it is up to movies like The Pianist and The Boy in the Striped Pajamas and testimonies, like the ones we have read, to tell their stories.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Holocaust Depicted Through Film "The Pianist". (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Holocaust, Genocide and Human Rights

To study history means that one must come to terms that it is ridden with evils, most against groups of human beings. Between the late 1930s and mid-1940s, one of the worst examples of a Genocide in history had taken place in Europe. The Holocaust saw Nazi's in Germany slaughtering around six million Jews and an overall total of almost eleven million human beings. The use of gas chambers and experiments to torture and kill these innocent lives were used to both mentally and physically wipe out a race of people. The Nazi Germans had many reasons, some clear and some complex to understand, in acting in the matter they did towards the Jews. Through different perspectives and testimonies, the culture of anti-Semitism, fear of superiors, and nationalism in Germany were all driving motivations of the perpetrators of the Holocaust. This analysis could thus help in understanding why more genocides and crimes against humanity occur to this day. The study of the Holocaust sees anti-Semitism as one of the greatest motives behind why the Nazi killed so many Jews.

The hatred towards Jews stems from Adolph Hitler and his beliefs of what was wrong with Germany. He and many that followed him,associated the Jews with economic hard times and foreign oppressors, although they did not pose an actual threat to anyone (Niewyk 194). They forced the Jewish people to wear yellow stars to not be able to hide their identity, were herded into ghettos, and eventually shipped off to concentration camps with the intention to be killed. The Jews were not seen as humans but rather as outsiders that needed to be done away with in order to have the Germans rise and make society right again. Many Nazi officers were made to believe that, Jews were viewed as enemies of modernity and could never be truly part of what Nazi Germany was becoming (Jones 235). Germany, with the Nazis leading, could only see themselves going in a certain direction and revamping their economic and social climates. It was to be believed that the Jews were going to hinder this progression and action needed to be taken before they took over.

The Nuremberg Laws of 1935 stripped away the rights of Jews and added more fuel that this race was inferior to the Nazi Germans (Jones 236). No longer was it just a group of people oppressing another group of people, but with laws and a whole country were behind them in progressing along. By taking away of rights and livelihood, the Nazi revealed that anti-Semitism was rooted in every discussion that was made towards the Jews. Anti-Semitism was only the tipping point in the motivations of the perpetrators of the Holocaust. Fear played an important role in the operations of Nazi Germany and in how they carried out their plans. Many of the guards and assistants of concentration camps felt pressured to commit the killings or to construct the places where Jews may be killed. This was due to the fact that some felt that if they did not comply with their superiors, they may be kicked out or meet their own deaths. The chain of command was not only something to be abided in Nazi society, but was used as a tool for getting subordinates to do actions that they may not morally want to do. Karl Schultze, an engineer of crematoriums, expressed that he,was afraid of losing my position and of possible arrest if he did not build these deadly structures (Handout).

He was not only afraid of the Nazi superiors, but fearful of going against his country and what he believed and stood for. It could even be said that some guards and workers could have been victims themselves, as they were made to have no choices in what the horrors that were going on. This fear was used in order for Nazis of higher ranks to have tasks completed, even if they were cruel and unimaginably. They made it seem that if you were not with the Nazis, then you would also become an enemy against the German state. Unfortunately, nationalism also played a role in the Nazi's perpetrator's actions during the Holocaust. Nationalism is having pride in one's country, whether it is through one's ideas and beliefs or through someone's actions. It may seem that having pride in one country would be a positive attribute, however, it has been used to manipulate mass amounts of people to think that something may be right when it is not. The Nazi's in Germany were able to systematically kill so many Jews due to using nationalism to motivate others to commit monstrous tasks. Engineer Fritz Sander testified that, I saw it as my duty to apply specialist knowledge in this way to help Germany win the war, when discussing the building of bigger crematoriums (Handout).

Similarly, when testifying, SS Wilhelm Bahr explained that I only had orders to pour in the gas and I do not know anything about it (Handout). Engineers like Sander and Nazi officers like Bahr were some of many who followed blindly by whatever Nazi superiors told them. They did so as they believed they were doing what was good for the country and did not see a reason to question anything. This became an excuse to not face the fact that they were killing innocent people in order to appease a dictator, Adolph Hitler. Many knew what harm they were doing, but looked the other way as it wasn't a good enough reason to stop. Many saw that these,ordinary Germans easily became genocidal killers and did so even though they did not have to (Jones 251). Although the Nazi gave very little choice on what certain things they had people doing, some of these men could have morally realized and stopped and hopefully escaped. But the pressure from superiors and the fear of going against the country made men turn the other way and carry on, as if nothing evil was going on.

Nationalism could be an extremely manipulative way to get people to do what they want and that is exactly what the Nazis did. The Nazi Doctors were some of the evilest and cruel perpetrators of the Holocaust. These doctors would perform experiments on prisoners in the concentration camps and had no regard as to who they were experimenting with. Many of these doctors did not see the Jews as real humans, but rather as objects to tinker with. Robert Lifton explained that They [the SS doctors] did their work just as someone who goes to an office goes about his work, making what they did seem normal (Handout). These doctors almost seemed to separate themselves, from the people they were in the concentration camps and the people outside of it. By normalizing what they were doing, it made it seem as if they were not bothered by the fact that they were mutilating and killing Jews (Handout). These doctors were also being asked to do these horrific things and if they didn't comply, they might face consequences like anyone else who goes against the superiors of the Nazis. Isabella Leitner, a survivor of Nazi Dr. Mengle, stated that you would never suspect the evilhe was the genius of death when describing how Dr. Mengle came off before the torture (Handout). These doctors came off as normal people, yet turned towards cruel and unimaginable actions to experiment and ultimately bring death to the Jewish people. Nationalism played a huge role in the psychology of the Nazi doctors. Many of these doctors were conducting experiments for the betterment of society and hopes to help with the war. Through this reasoning, many were blind to realize what damage they were doing, as they only wanted to complete their tasks and help the country.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Holocaust, Genocide and Human Rights. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Extra Credit Assignment on Holocaust Survivor: Susan Cernyak-Spatz

The event which I attended was a presentation from Holocaust survivor, Susan Cernyak-Spatz. Unfortunately, she was not able to make it to speak due to not feeling well. Instead, a video of her speaking on surviving the Holocaust was played. The one problem I had with this event was that it was extremely hard to hear her in the video, which made it difficult to fully comprehend everything she had to say and to take notes on it. I did go back and watch the video on my own and was able to comprehend most of what was said, but it still was hard to understand at times.

The documentary began with her talking about the important people who came to power in 1933. One being Franklin D. Roosevelt and the other Adolf Hitler. She did not talk about Roosevelt much, except that he was a good person in power. She did, however, jump right into Hitler's coming to power. Some background on herself and family is that she lived in Berlin with her parents and ended up moving to Vienna. Then in Vienna in 1938, they had to leave behind everything like the food in their refrigerator and valuables like China plates. They left only bringing one suitcase to catch a flight from Vienna to Prague. Then from Vienna, they left for Poland, which was the only open border in 1939. However, they did not issue visas anymore to people with Jewish names, which meant her father had to make some illegal arrangements for them to get across the border. They were separated from their father because he had to go first to make sure everything would work. It just so happened that her father ended up making it out of Poland to Belgium on what was one of the last flights out at the time. Susan's mother and her were deported to Beijing and were put in one of the five barracks there. They were searched and then went into a huge area to sit on straw and later experienced what was called the selection in Auschwitz.

After she was selected, Susan goes to describe her initial view of the camp after the three day ride. Prior to getting there, they did not really know exactly what was at Auschwitz or what it had in store. All they knew was that people go there and never come back. She describes their arrival as having an indescribable smell, but nobody knew what it really was. There were two flames going up with smoke, but nobody made the connection that those were bodies burning. She remembers seeing an ambulance with a big red cross on it. She describes how psychologically, it gave her and others a sense of hope because when one sees an ambulance, they associate it with help and being taken care of.

It was fascinating learning about the true hardships of life in Auschwitz. Susan described the bowl which everyone received as being basically all they had. The bowl was used to drink out of, eat out of, and pee into. This led to her talking about the precalculated dehumanization of people. They came to have no personalities, no utensils, and very little food. What they did have was piles of filth everywhere which led to many diseases. During the time of these hardships which Susan and others were faced with, the Jewish prisoners were in a liminal ground. Dr. Davis describes a liminal ground as a middle space between life and death (C.S. Davis, personal communication, September 27, 2018). While in Auschwitz, prisoners were no longer truly living, but they were also not dead yet. Unfortunately, they were stuck in the middle.

When asked how Susan survived all of this, she said the most important thing was to accept the nightmare as your life. This can definitely apply to any circumstance in today's world as well. Everything in life is not always great, but by coming to terms with it and giving it your best to fight out that hard time or circumstance, you can combat just about anything, as seen by Susan surviving Auschwitz. I can apply this idea to my own life, because when I am going through a hard time, I remember to accept the negative aspects, and move on the best that I can.

Susan then talked about her friend Lilly who decided to give up because it just was not the life she wanted to live, like many others chose to do. Chapter 5 of Deadzone, Death as a Horrible Other: A Relationship with the Other Side, clarifies that Characters lose their fear of death when they accept its inevitability (Davis & Crane, 2019, p. 24). Many Jewish prisoners did not have the same perseverance as Susan. People like Lilly who had suffered so much, came to terms with death and its inevitability. They would rather accept their fate than live another day in the horrific concentration camp.

Susan also described just how normal death became at Auschwitz. When it was most people's time to go, many were physically and emotionally ready, almost allowing death to be their best option. This really constructs the idea about life and death by showing that if a person's quality of life is poor, they are probably more accepting of their life coming to an end. It also goes to show how the battle with one's conscious and will to survive vary among people. The strong willed people probably had more hopes and dreams outside of that camp, allowing them to push onward, while others, like Lilly, could not see the finish line.

Susan's story of surviving the Holocaust reminded me of , Night and Fog, a short film based on the Nazi concentration camps. The film was very sad and depicted things like torture, gas chambers, and piles of corpses. Although a film like this may be hard for some to watch, including the gruesome graphics is necessary in order to fully understand what took place. Just like Night and Fog, Susan's story was definitive, which according to Dr. Crane, equates to undistorted - the truth and only the truth (J. L. Crane, communication studies, October 30, 2018).

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Extra Credit Assignment on Holocaust Survivor: Susan Cernyak-Spatz. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Affects of the Holocaust

The Holocaust was a time in history that will never be forgotten. It was a time of sorrow and pain. The historical fiction novel Lilac Girls by Martha Hall Kelly demonstrates how the Holocaust affected the lives of very different people. The three characters Caroline Ferriday, Kasia Kuzmerick, and Herta Oberheuser all live disparate lives during the Holocaust but each of them gets affected by it. People who lived through the Holocaust had their social, romantic and family lives affected poorly.

The years 1933 to 1945 were some of the most horrific years in world history. There were over 17 million deaths through these years and 6 million of those people were Jews. That time period was called the Holocaust. It was a time when humanity went out of control. During this period there were concentration camps overfilled with adults, teens and children working as hard as they can because if they showed weakness they had a very likely chance of being killed. And others were killed for no reason. Millions of people were shot, put into gas chambers, starved to death, suffered from illness and more. Leaving mountains of lifeless bodies piled up to get burnt to ash and then get disposed of.

Adolf Hitler the leader of it all started off by taking rule of Germany when Germany was in an economic crisis. Germany during this period was called Nazi Germany and the Germans who were on Hitler's side were called Nazis. Hitler's rule soon escalated terribly, leading the creation many concentration camps and overcrowding them with thousands and thousands of jews from all around Europe. In the article The Article That Told The World About The Holocaust Hillary Kelly states the first inhabitants of the Warsaw Ghetto were placed in rail cars and deported to Nazi concentration camps less than six months later, the ghetto held only approximately 50,000 of the original 550,000 Jews. That means that 90% of the Jews were moved within six months, and that was just at one ghetto. This shows how brutal it was during the Holocaust. People were forced out of their homes leaving almost everything behind for the Nazis to steal and make money over, then forced to work.

Lilac Girls by Martha Hall Kelly takes place during the holocaust and focuses mainly on three women, Caroline Ferriday, Kasia Kuzmerick and Herta Oberheuser. The novel is written in first person, however the narrator switches each chapter between the three main characters stated before. Caroline, Kasia and Herta have very different lives and this novel tells the story of how these girls come together despite their different lifestyles, Kelly's novel is based off a true story, it mostly takes place in a concentration camp called Ravensbruck which was a real camp in Germany.This camp was very cruel, it had done medical experiments on teen girls which lead to a lot of suffering. According to the article Ravensbruck The camp was the second largest women's concentration camp in size, Auschwitz being first. And it was also the only main camp that was meant for mostly women. Around this time women were viewed as less important which is why the novel being about 3 girls and one of the largest women's concentration camps is very significant. Kelly shows that women did have power during this time and that they were strong, on top of that she showed the effects that the Holocaust had on people.

The novel Lilac Girls begins with the perspective of Caroline Ferriday she is like the hero of the novel. She is based off a real person named Caroline Ferriday. She lives in Manhattan and is a New York socialite, she also works for a charity that helps french orphans. Caroline is a wealthy hard worker that loves her job very much. She is loving and brave and stands up for what she believes in. During the first couple of pages of the novel these characteristics are shown. Caroline states Loving all things French was simply genetic for me. (4) This makes her seem sweet and positive like she always looked towards the good side of life, but then her life takes an unexpected turn when Hitler's army invades Poland.

In 1939 Hitler invaded Poland, and next up he wanted to invade France. As shown before Caroline really loved France, so when she heard this it hurt her a lot. After hearing the unfortunate news she did more research and was disgusted by what she learned. But even throughout these times Caroline still kept all of her good qualities, A man Caroline was very close to Paul went to France to try and help but got imprisoned. It was terrible news but oddly hopeful, for at least he was alive. (219). This shows that she still tried to look at the positive sides, she was staying strong even though someone she loved was in danger. And although she tried to stay strong it did not last very long. This was affecting her relationship with Paul and giving her a lot of stress, and sadness, and anger. 'Im fine,' I said, stuffing the frustration down deep. 'I guess it's just hard on the nerves,' (221). This shows that Caroline was starting to struggle and lose her bravery. Its showing the negative effects The Holocaust had on her. It was affecting her romantic and social life and her qualities that made Caroline Ferriday, Caroline Ferriday. She was starting to not always look on the positive side of life. She lost some of her friends and Paul to the Nazis. And she didn't have as much time to be social as before because she was so focused on helping the others. Although Caroline did have one good effect from it all and that was that she saved a bunch of prisoners in Ravensbruck and brought them to America to get the treatment they needed after the medical experiments they were put through in Germany which according to the article Ravensbruck they people who were saved/survived were called lapins which translates to rabbits.

The next girl introduced to the novel is Kasia Kuzmerick. Kasia is like the victim of the story and is not based off a real person like Caroline, Kasia is fictional. She has one sister a mom and a dad. She is a teenage polish girl and her school had gotten closed down due to the war. Her school being shut down affected her education because she no longer had a place to learn, and it also affected her social life since she was not interacting with the people at school everyday like usual. And according to Hillary Kelly's article The Article That Told The World About The Holocaust many schools got shut down during this time. Kasia was very close with her family she cared about all of them alot. I knew not to argue with papa. (29). She said this when her father was distraught.This shows that she has respect for her father and that she cares about him and does not want to argue with him. Kasia and her sister decide to try and help prisoners escape the camp but while they were trying to help they got captured and put into Ravensbruck. This affected her relationship with her family since she was separated from all of them. This also poorly affected her by putting her in a dangerous place and it made her very scared and weaker. But just like Caroline Kasia did have one good affect from the Holocaust and that was that she was saved by Caroline and became friends with Caroline. Also she got the Health care she needed.

The last women introduced is Herta Oberheuser. She is like the villain of the novel.She is based off a real person who is named Herta Oberheuser also. She is a doctor and she signs up to work at Ravensbruck to do medical experiments on the prisoners. Nothing affected her that much while the Holocaust was actually happening, but when the Holocaust had ended she was put in prison for murder since Herta did harmful experiments on teenagers. This affected Hertas career very badly, since she was in jail she could not work as much so she was not learning more about being a doctor. Although she did learn some new medical tricks while working at the camp,

Martha Hall Kelly's historical fiction novel Lilac Girls tells an inspirational story based on true events that happened in the worlds history. It shows how one big conflict like the Holocaust can affect everyone no matter if the person is the hero, victim, or villain. And as the survivors of Holocaust are decreasing this story should be remembered and spread to others.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Affects of the Holocaust. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Definition of Holocaust: Destruction or Slaughter on a Mass Scale

How Hitler rose to power

On January 30, 1933 the president of Germany Paul von Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler as the new chancellor of Germany. At the time Germany was in an economical depression that had put millions out of work, because of this its was fairly easily for someone like Adolf Hitler to rise to power. On July 14, 1933 the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche arbeiterpartei in German) was declared the only political party that was allowed in Germany. At the time german population did not realize the extent of the nazis hate for jews and non-germans.

The beginning of a tragedy

One survivor named Edward Adler says that on June the 14th, 1935 he was at a birthday party when he heard someone banging on the door. Tthinking it was his friends he opened the door,. but instead of finding his friends on the other side he found two men with guns telling him that he was under arrest( it was later found out that it was because he was dating a non-jewish woman). Confused he got dressed and left with the the men. From there he was taken to the local police station and was put in a room with two to three hundred other people all asking each other why they were in there. The answer was always that they didn't know.

Around six o'clock in the morning they loadedloading everyone, including Edward, into trains (the germans had not begun to use boxcars yet). Then after several hours they arrived to the outskirt of Berlin and unknowingly began to march to the concentration camp. Edward was the forced to do construction labor until in 1938 his wife made arrangements to leave Germany. Later on it wouldn't be so easy to leave.

Auschwitz and the Angel of Death

Over 6 million people were killed in the Hholocaust itself, over 1 million of these people were killed in a Auschwitz. Even though many know about Auschwitz not very many people have heard of Josef Mengele the Angel of Death. Josef joined the Nazi party in 1937 and on May 30, 1943 he was transferred to the Auschwitz Death camp. In the death camp if they had survived they were to be unloaded and go through a selection. Selections were common occurrences in death camps. When a new group of people arrived a selection took place as soon as they stepped out of the boxcars. They were terrifying things, the prisoners would step out and soon after a german guard would either point to the right or to the left. Whether they lived or died was up to the guard. If they were pregnant, had kids, were under 18 or looked too old they were chosen to die and would be sent to the showers which were actually the gas chambers in disguise. If they were chosen to live then they would be shaved, given new clothes and taken to the barracks. Most guards could not do this sober they would often show up drunk to feel less guilty and would not go if they weren't required to,but Josef Mengele was different. He would come to almost every selection, sober and in his best uniform unlike all the other doctors and guards.

Mengele wanted to make a name for himself in the medical community using genetics. He thought if he could find out how to assure that a baby would look a certain way(eye /hair colors) it would be one step closer to the saving the german population.For this reason mengele was obsessed with twins, as well as people with dwarfism, gigantism, and those with heterochromia. He didn't want to missed any twins so he told the guards to shout Zwillinge! (which meant twins) when unloading the boxcars. Some parents did not want give up their children and hid them more often than not the children were found but if not then they sent off to the gas chambers with their mothers.

Josef was called the Angel of Death for many reasons,but one of the main reasons were that he experimented on children of all ages.He would often drop dye or some other chemical into their eyes wondering if it would change their eye color, or purposely inject one twin with a dangerous disease to see if the other would react, if the injected twin died they would kill the other one as well to see what affects the disease had. Each and everyday the twins would be examined for any differences in their physical appearance, then they would have massive blood transfusions,after they would have various injections without anesthesia. That were painful and often fatal.

The War after the War

Even though many camps were liberated the war was not yet over for the prisoners that survived. Most prisoners went back to their hometowns only to find out that they were destroyed and a ghost of what they were before the war. On top of that over 6 million Jews were killed many big families were reduced to one or two people and small families were even less likely to survive. Since this was common after the war many committed suicide not being able to deal with the loss. Others had one or two family members left and lived to honor their family. The holocaust was a dreadful time in history where many inhuman things happened we should learn from past mistakes and prevent this from happening again.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Definition of Holocaust: Destruction or Slaughter on a Mass Scale. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Holocaust: a Big Mistake

When the Nazi party took over Germany, they instituted rules and laws that affected Jews and other minorities differently than the primarily Caucasian majority. They caused extreme hardships for everyone during this time. These institutions, along with the inherent beliefs of the Nazi party, are what lead to what we now know as the Holocaust.

The Holocaust was a period of time when the Nazi party had taken over Germany. They believed that certain people were dangerous and needed to be eliminated. These people that were so dangerous were innocent people, including Gypsies, Poles, Russians, but mostly Jews. In Sandra S. Williams' study, The Impact of the Holocaust on Survivors and Their Children, it explains in detail about life before, during and after the Holocaust. Before the Nazi party had taken control, Germany and it's citizens never saw themselves as divided. In Germany, nearly two-thirds of the 500,000 Jews were engaged in trade and commerce, one quarter worked in the industry, and about one-eighth were in public service and the professions working in mainly law and medicine, helping the country. (Sandra S. Williams)

Adolf Hitler had a huge influence on Germany and led the Holocaust. Hitler rose to power when he was appointed the chancellor, is the head of the German government, in January 1933. Due to the economic depression that went down beforehand, when the Nazi party came into play, all of Germany thought to have found a savior. Hitler led Germany with his powerful inspiring speeches, speaking towards a country desperate for change, and promising a new fulfilling life to the people of Germany. In Hitler's' Rise and Fall Timeline, OpenLearn, it goes into detail about all things Hitler did to help Germany politically. Hitler had volunteered his services to help his country. He attended meetings to get people out of poverty. He became a well-known and highly respected leader. Hitler was a good leader until he began to abuse power. Due to the Nazi party's discriminating beliefs, Hitler divided the majority of the country into forced organizations. Terror began to spread throughout the country. Trade Unions were abolished and employees were forced to resign and join the Nazi party. Citizens lost their freedom. Their privacy was no longer private, having officials listen in on phone calls, read mail, and even search houses without a warrant (the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Hitler Comes to Power), The Nazi party set up a system to keep political opponents out of the Nazi state, mainly imprisoning Communists and Socialists. However, as World War II began, the system expanded fast. The system quickly becomes more violent. They imprisoned anyone who resisted the domination and sent them to concentration camps for hard labor and was even murdered. They captured everyone they thought to be racially inferior or politically unacceptable. Within three years the number of prisoners quadrupled, from about 25,000 before the war to about 100,000 in March 1942 (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum).

When the Nazis captured the Jews, they put them into concentration camps where the Jews went through hardships, such as hard labor, starvation, and brutal deaths. Auschwitz was the largest concentration camp. It was actually three camps built into one. All three different camps holding a different purpose for Auschwitz. According to the video, Auschwitz, from History.com Staff, the concentration camps were so awful and inhuman. There were bodies piled up in stacks. Many of the captive citizens became very ill with Typhus and Malnutrition. One was a prison camp, another was an extermination camp, and the last one was a slave-labor camp. The Nazis had a very unusual way of getting rid of the prisoners. One way was gas chambers, where they would gather them into a room and fill it with a poisonous gas killing them all. Another more cruel way of murdering the prisoners was using them as target practice in an open field. These people already unhealthy, starving and exhausted-would be sent out into an open field, while the guards shot them down. According to Britannica Encyclopedia, 1.1 to 1.5 million people died at Auschwitz; with 90 percent of them being Jews. Among these numbers were 19,000 Roma, who were held at the camp until they were gassed. The Roma was the only other group gassed in family units along with Jews. Poles consisted of the largest victim group in Auschwitz, around 83,000 were killed.

Not only was the Nazi party using cruel and inhumane ways to torture and kill their captive citizens they conducted inhumane experiments such as those done by a famous scientist by the name of Josef Mengele, known for his fascination of twins, but he was also interested in the using them for medical research. He joined the Nazi party, getting his medical degree. Here he studied the prisoners for medical purposes. However, with the thousands of people coming into Auschwitz at a time, Josef set out to find twins throughout the camp to experiment with. Now that he was testing prisoners no one cared about being humane. No one saw him as using humans. In BBC News it tells many different stories of which twins had gone through due to experiments that were done by Josef himself. Twins were taken right out of their hometown and taken to camps to be studied. One set of twins who were identical but had different colored eyes were very special to Josef. However, when almost all tested twins died, either as a result of the experimentations or were murdered due to the process, but he would not get into trouble with the law.

World War II began September 1939. While the Americans, debating on whether to stay neutral during the war, eventually got sucked in when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. The United States declaring war on Japan, lead to Germany starting the war with the United States. Thus leading to the United States joining the Allies' to fight against the Axis powers. Although the United States did not join the war to rescue the captured citizens, but instead to protect democracy. In the end, the Allies did rescue tens of thousands of the captured minorities. The United States, along with the other Allies defeated Nazi Germany along with the other Axis powers, ending the Holocaust. Afterward, the prisoners were freed, Hitler committed suicide to avoid capture, and the Nazi party was gone. (The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, The United States and The Holocaust.)

Even after the Holocaust ended the memories, camps, artifacts, and people are still here today. Millions of minorities and officials died during this time period but millions survived. The ones that had gone through the camps and the hiding still have the scars and memories of what they had to go through long ago. We have museums that you can go to today to visit and look at artifacts that had happened during the time. Anne Frank is now known today as a well-known Jewish teenager that hid in the attic of a store with her family to avoid capture of the Nazi party. Otto, Anne's father, began to make plans for him and his family to avoid capture until the War was over. On 6 July 1942, the Frank family went into hiding in the attic of Otto's office building. Four other people joined them after a few months of hiding. Only a few of Otto's staff knew about the hiding place. These four employees helped them stay hidden, and made sure they had everything in order to survive. (The Holocaust Explained) Anne Frank is famous for keeping her own diary during her time in hiding. We know the challenges they faced and the way they lived throughout hiding. Her diary tells about personal experiences along with serious events that had happened. Anne writes until her capture at age 15 when she was taken to a camp along with her family. She had died in the camp within a day of her sister Margot's death. In Anne Frank, Biography, it says The Secret Annex: Diary Letters from June 14, 1942, to August 1, 1944, was a selection of passages from Anne Frank's diary published on June 25, 1947, by Anne Frank's father. Otto published the diary for other to know what the victims had to endure for such a long time, but more importantly, he did it for Anne. He wanted Anne to be proud and wanted her to be known. Throughout this diary, and its pages of despair, it is a story that shows so many other emotions, Anne had endured. It shows her hope of surviving, faith, and the love of what she did have and her family. Anne Frank tells stories in such detail and imagination to get the real story. It tells from family holidays to horrid tragedies that had happened to her that will still today bring us to tears.

The whole world learned from the mistakes that happened during the Holocaust. We have laws that prevent human testing, we allow people to choose and practice their own religion. The United States getting involved to stop the Nazi party from further domination was the right move for the whole world. This showed us what the right thing was in a very horrid situation. What we learned from the Holocaust was to never let something like this happen again. Throughout history,l we always tell people to remember what happens and to not let some history repeat. During 9/11 we say never forget we learned the phrase, Remember the Alamo! We do not want to go through another Holocaust ever again. Rockie Blunt, an infantryman, US army tells us that the prisoners told the soldiers to promise to never let the world forget what happens here. Rockie states Having seen a concentration camp it had a bigger effect on my life than anything else I've ever seen or fought or done. in the Auschwitz video on History.com. The fact that Rockie had seen so much already being in the army, but nothing has even compared to what he saw in concentration camps.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Holocaust: A Big Mistake. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Responsibility for the Holocaust

Latisha made an important acknowledgment in mentioning, atrocities were devoted due to the Germans were so cruel, and aggressive during the time Hitler was in power. Fundamental attribution is defined as making a judgment about someone's character which can be from a person's conduct in a particular situation. Not seeing the German individuals were experiencing and why they were acting the way they were rather Latisha's attention was straightforwardly on German Culture in Hitler's opportunity. She moved her focal point from Hitler's power to everyday citizens. One motivation behind why she could have put forth is expression since she didn't know much about the Hitler's day and age or she knew just how Jews were fiercely killed. She related the all the German individuals as being cruel individuals with unusual bent identities.

This could be valid for a few people, yet not all. They may have been compelled to conflict with their will or debilitated to be executed. Another motivation behind why she could have put forth this expression since she was not completely mindful of the conditions and the circumstances Germans and Jews were living in. Expecting Latisha is American the way of life and attitude she originates from can put forth her make this expression. For instance, she once in a while hears somebody murdered somebody and the news is finished. One more week comes one individual was discovered kicked the bucket et cetera. There was nothing presented in this situation like this one. In her mind, she can misrepresent since she was never in this sort of circumstance. Again it can go the other route also. For instance, a man who has proceeded with this circumstance most likely say a similar thing since they have lost their confidence in German individuals they were damaged.

It influences us to think then why Latisha put forth this expression. I trust her social qualities and the outlook she was raised in has a considerable measure to do with this. Living in America, we have the opportunity and are possess rights. Indeed, even minorities are viewed as equivalent; there are no religious commitments or sexual orientation confinements. Latisha put forth this expression since when the inquiry was gotten some information about Germans and Hitler it set off her mind that they slaughtered numerous Jews. Another clarification to the motivation behind why such a significant number of Germans conformed to Hitler's requests was to butcher a huge number of blameless Jews and others. Amid the war, Germans took after the request from Hitler since he was in charge. German who was in the armed force just saw them as adversaries and murdered them. Regardless of whether they had affections for Jews, they needed to keep it aside and take after the requests else they would need to pay the cost.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Responsibility for the Holocaust. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Holocaust is One of the Worst Events in Human History

Germany’s most known and devastating historical event happened between the years 1941-1945, the period of time where the Holocaust occurred. The main perpetrator was Adolf Hitler, but the people of Germany allowed escalation beforehand. The Holocaust was a terrifying experience for anyone who wasn’t a part of Hitler’s “Aryan” race, but was mainly directed towards Jewish people. Hitler and his followers attempted to sentence all Jewish people and other non-Aryans to death, killing them on a mass scale (genocide). The mentioning of the Holocaust sends chills to thousands of people in Germany, of Jewish descent, and especially Holocaust survivors. These horrific occurrences caused other countries to realize the potential dangers power can cause. Preventing power from falling into the wrong hands is made a priority so these types of experiences won’t be able to happen again. Germany had multiple steps that led up to genocide. This process is called the Pyramid of Hate. It begins with the prejudice attitudes and acts of prejudice stages which were characterized by scapegoating and stereotypes, which led to the discrimination and violence stages which involved oppression and laws that deprived Jews of certain rights, which finally resulted in the genocide stage whose principal attributes were camps that led to killing a large population of Jews.

Prejudice attitudes and acts of prejudice begins with anti-semitic behaviors. Germany was involved in World War I and citizens were promised victory by their government. Although Adolf Hitler was born and raised in Austria, he was accidentally given the opportunity to serve his time in the German army. When Germany faced defeat, the government and Hitler himself, “blamed the country’s downfall, though some 100,000 German Jews fought for their country during the war,” (Holocaust-Overview). Since the government is the only news source for Germany, German citizens easily believed the credibility for this accusation. There was a vast amount of Jewish people in the army, but the Germans brought what was called the “stab in the back” theory. The Germans were convinced that they somehow betrayed their own country while serving time in the military. Multiple forms of propaganda was released afterwards, all of them framing the Jewish population as traitors that brought their country to defeat in World War I. A really popular piece of propaganda was Hitler’s book titled “Mein Kampf”, which translates to “My Struggle”. The title is self explanatory, Hitler wanted to speak about his supposed hardships living in a country filled with Jewish people. He introduces his idea of a “pure” race, and calls it the Aryan race. Ideally, people who fit within this racial category would have pale skin, blue eyes, and blond hair. Jewish people did not fit within any of those standards, and Hitler began to stereotype them in his book. He describes that, “the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people.” In other words, he claimed that Jewish people are purposefully got involved with pure-blooded Germans specifically to disconnect them from their race. Throughout his writing, he portrayed Jewish people as the enemies in every situation. He had the intent of gathering as much people on his side so he could gain power, and he succeeded. Mein Kampf became a bestseller and managed to influence many people into believing anti-semitic beliefs. Hitler was able to gather a really big amount of followers that are later referred to as Nazis.

Discrimination and violence is where Jews begin to experience more oppressive treatment. By what was called the Nuremberg Laws, Jewish people were deprived of receiving certain education, had limited housing options, and weren’t able to get employed outside of Jewish businesses. Then, they were forced into ghettos. Ghettos were areas that isolated the Jewish community from the non-Jewish people. Living conditions were miserable and they were crowded. There, “The Germans ordered Jews in the ghettos to wear identifying badges or armbands,” (Ghettos-Discrimination). The badges and armband contained the Star of David, a significant symbol in the Jewish religion. Using this as a way to separate Jews shows how much the Germans objectified them. The Germans looked down on the Jewish people and their religion, and felt superior in every way. Jews were all labeled as if they were property and were put into ghettos to create the feeling that they didn’t belong. Germans who were aware that this was morally wrong allowed this to occur due to a psychological circumstance called bystander apathy. It’s been proven that the, “presence of others creates a diffusion of responsibility,” (Intro to Bystander Apathy). Bystanders in the Holocaust are those who didn’t participate in giving the Jews unjust treatment, but they let it happen without speaking out or offering to assist the victims. There’s a really strong possibility that the witnesses didn’t know how to aid those in need or feared for their own safety. Bystanders don’t feel responsible because they aren’t the ones who’s committing the oppression directly. The Nazis used this to their advantage and it made their goal easier to reach. They relied on bystanders so they would be able to gain more control. In the ghettos, they were constantly living under fear. Jewish leaders and policemen within ghettos had no choice but to work with German authorities. It’s also described that, “The Germans did not hesitate to kill those Jewish policemen who were perceived to have failed to carry out orders.” Along with living in what wasn’t exactly the most comfortable environment, their lives were constantly on the line. The Germans were willing to kill over simply failing to follow instructions, and terror overwhelmed those who were trapped in this secluded area. The Jews had to carefully think about every move they make so they wouldn’t upset the Germans in any way. It was a hard life to live, but what came next was unbearable.

Genocide, also known as the holocaust, resulted in the death of six million people. After the ghettos, Jewish people were imprisoned in concentration camps. Jewish Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel describes his experience in concentration camps in his book “Night”. When they first arrived, they were sorted out into two groups. In fear, he questioned, “which road led to prison and which to the crematoria.” The ones who were in good health and relatively young were enslaved doing nothing but hard labor. They spent their time in concentration camps starved, beaten, tortured, and always expected death. Those who became a survivor made it out barely alive. Those who weren’t in the best health and were considered old had to wait in line for a painful death. This already killed a big amount of Jews, and of course, inspections were done once a while to see whose health was failing and who was growing older. They were sentenced to death without hesitation. Later on, death camps were created. They had gas chambers that “killed tens of thousands of Jews, primarily forced laborers too weak to work,” (Final Solution- Overview). All these events are the “Final Solution”. Hitler first wanted to use them for labor work, but his primary goal at the end was to exterminate the entire Jewish population.

The Pyramid of Hate was the escalation of events that happened prior to the Holocaust. Adolf Hitler and his followers directly brought the enormous amount of oppression to the Jewish people of Germany. Yet, witnesses who were well aware this was morally wrong let Hitler gain enough power to the point where it was too late to stop him. The prejudice attitudes and acts of prejudice stages seemed harmless. They both involved scapegoating and stereotypes, something that seemed like would pass overtime. Then came the discrimination and violence stages. They were both filled with more serious oppressive treatment. Laws were created, and Jews were held against their will to live in ghettos. Still, everyone thought that this would be the worst form of oppression their government could give them. The citizens let it slide, allowing themselves to rely on some other being to help the Jewish people out. No one called for action. When the last stage of genocide came, it finally became clear what Hitler’s true intentions were. Indifference led to genocide, and Nazis relied on it in order to gain control. The traumatic events that happened in Germany taught other countries to not let power fall into the wrong hands. Anti-semitism still exists today, and allowing escalation is made a prime concern not to let happen again.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Holocaust is One of the Worst Events in Human History. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Holocaust in Hollywood Movies

Hollywood is notorious for creating films based on true stories, but the end result elaborates the truth or adds details for entertainment to increase interest. Schindler's List is no different. Many historical movies have had love interests or love story base line to appeal to more audiences therefore increasing revenue. Spielberg not only adds to the movie but chooses to leave out historical information to retell easier. Schindler's List is based on the book written by Thomas Keneally which has been categorized as fiction; from this book a screen play was written by Steven Zaillian and attempts to say it was written based on accurate information. Based on this information the movie was marketed as based on a true story. Most of the characters names and city names were correct in the movie even the name of the factory and camps were correct. But the majority of the rest of the movie was created or misrepresented for entertainment purposes. Spielberg also blurs the line between fact and fiction by referring to factual matters in a fictional way (Journal of Historical review). Schindler's List has won many awards and Spielberg has used this to establish himself as the Holocaust expert yet the more information others learn questions arise that this movie nor Spielberg can answer.

The films very first event didn't take place in real life. As film starts with a dinner exchange between Schindler and a crew of Nazi commanders. This interaction of Schindler meeting the Nazi commanders would have not taken place unless it was a planned event, because he had already known them from his previous line of work. Another thing that Hollywood added was the scene where Schindler was watching the homes of the Jewish people in the ghetto get demolished, while riding a horse on the top of a hill. Realistically Schindler's factory was mostly operated by the Polish, while the Hollywood movie showcases the work environment being strictly Jewish. The movie also shows Oskar Schindler Listing out the name of his workers he was trying to save, making it seem as though he personally knew each and every one of his workers. Which was in fact quite the opposite because according to his wife he only knew a handful of his workers by name and even then, it was only because they had visited him often.

Oskar Schindler's wife, Emilie was almost cut out of the film altogether despite her important role in real life. She kept all the workers in the factory healthy by providing them food. The movie did portray Oskar and Emilie's relationship correctly. He was married to Emilie at age 19, but never without a mistress or two.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Holocaust in Hollywood Movies. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gender Roles in Modern Literature

Romance in modern literature oversees the typical Happily ever after and the image of love made to endure. The fabricated idea of the perfect man made to sweep a woman off her feet in the return of falling at his. Throughout centuries authors have been posing the suppression of women's thoughts and feelings under the authority of man. Ernest Hemingway and Charlotte Perkins Gilman are two examples of authors who depict the downfall of marriage through gender roles. Hills like White Elephants and The Yellow Wallpaper render two females who succumb to the control of their significant other, leading to the potential distress of marriage.

The role of man in The Yellow Wallpaper consists of not only a husband but a physician, ... of high standing (Gilman 75) who serves as the primary decision maker throughout Jane's suffering. Treated as a child, Jane is repressed from making her own decisions, believing that, congenial work, with excitement and change (Gilman 75) would do her good. That being said she seizes at his feet with no intention of disagreeing with not only a man who fell in love with her, but also someone who believes ...there is no reason to suffer (Gilman 77).

Similarly, Hemingway's, Hills Like White Elephants presents the same male dominating relationship as Jig falls second to the American. In situations as simple as orderingan alcoholic beverage, Jig lacks the knowledge of another language when she calls on the American being the only one able to interact with the hispanic lady.

The American and the girl with him sat at a table in the shade (Hemingway 139). She is not referred to as woman or lady, but rather called on as the girl. The evolution of girl to woman comes with power, and in comparison of these two works, both women are powerless in the eyes of man. While discussing a certain operation, Jig is described as incapable of making the decision to abort her baby, on her own. Being recognized as a girl rather than a woman, she loses her strength and provides the American with the determination to return to normality where ...things will be like they were (Hemingway 141).

Fulfilling the roles of husband, doctor, and caregiver, John is oblivious to how serious his wife's sickness has turned. Not only is he selfish, but stubborn with his own diagnosis of Jane to be, temporary nervous depression - a slight hysterical tendency (Gilman 77). His words eat at her brain, causing her to turn away from the truth and run towards the darkness he provides. By simply allowing himself to listen to his wife, he would recognize her mental instability and provide her with the proper care needed to restore mental function. She continues to write in her journal, I'm glad my case is not serious! (Gilman 77).

In strict comparison with The Yellow Wallpaper, the American is seen to be just as stubborn as John. I think it's the best thing to do. But I don't want you to do it if you don't really want to. (Hemingway 141). By consistently implying that it's the only thing that made us unhappy (Hemingway 141), Jig is drawn to the idea of regaining that happiness and fulfilling an everlasting marriage. Meanwhile the American is selfish enough to let her lose her first child with a man whom she is completely devoted to. He runs from the idea of settling down andhaving a child as he finds comfort in knowing he can leave whenever. Ultimately, having this baby puts a damper on his escape plan and leaves a mother with no husband.

Both authors provide the prevailing concept of gender roles depicting man to suppress women from their true reality and happiness. Aside from the runoff comparisons, a contrast is found within the two works. The resolution in both short stories is different as in Hills Like White Elephants, it is up to the audience to determine the ending as Hemingway excluded key information from the story such as the American's name as well as how he chose the story to end. From doing so, the reader can infer that the baby was aborted due to the American constantly insisting that a life without a baby would bring much more happiness to their relationship. Jig was longing for this new happiness and after being constantly reminded and under the control of the American, she chose what was best for him rather than herself.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gender Roles in Modern Literature. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gender Roles in Literature

Throughout the history of literature, gender has played a significant role in how the characters were portrayed. The female gender is commonly depicted as being the weaker character while the male gender stronger. The male gender is often considered to be more rational thinking and women being more irrational. Ibsen uses these stereotypical gender traits throughout his play ""A Doll's House,"" but then he later reverses the stereotypes towards the end of the play to display that inner strength and weaknesses are characteristics of being human and are not based on being male or female.

Ibsen's play ""A Doll's House,"" is written to focus on the gender roles most commonly displayed during the Victorian society. During the Victorian period males were always the ones that went to work, handle all the business matters and where considered to be the head of the household leaving their wives to care of the household chores and tend the children. During this time only unmarried women were allowed to hold jobs. Ibsen's characters Helmer and Nora were a perfect example of how a married couple lived during the Victorian era. Torvald was a bank manager and managed all the money and he often commanded Nora on what to do and when to do it. Nora, being the traditional wife during this time was only allowed to stay at home and tend to the household duties and raise their children.

Torvald asserted his dominance over Nora early in the play in several different ways. He often refers to Nora as a pet by calling her animals such as ""lark"" and squirrel."" Torvald says, ""Come, come; my little skylark must not droop her wings. What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper? (Taking out his purse.) Nora, what do you think I have got here?"" (Gardner 2017). Torvald show his control over Nora when he ""takes her by the ear,"" this act represents his physical, emotional and financial control over her, in return Nora quietly accepts the nicknames he's given her and that displayed her feminine weakness.

Nora's character encountered several problems throughout Ibsen's play, just because she was a female during the Victorian period. When Torvald became ill, the doctor informed them that for him to get better, it would be best for them to move south, however, for them to make the move they would have to scrounge up the funds of two-hundred and fifty pounds. Because they did not have the money to make the trip, they would either have to take out a loan from the bank or hope that Torvald overcame his sickness. During the Victorian period then men were in charge of the household finances and because of this Torvald felt that if they were to take out a loan from the bank that his reputation would be defaced. Nora knew that they were in desperate need of the money and chose to take matters into her own hands and take out a loan without Torvald's knowledge and forged her father's signature on the paperwork. Because Nora is unable to apply for the loan herself this causes her to be the weaker person in her marriage to Torvald. By not being able to sign for a loan during this time often lead women to believe that they inadequate because they were female. During this time frame society deemed that women were mentally and emotionally unstable and it often resulted in impulsive behavior.

Victorian society values strong male traits such as those of strength, stability, and logic. Torvald's character in A Doll's House is an example of a secure, stable and rational male. He is in charge of his home, family and over all of the family finances. His masculinity is displayed in his marriage when he constantly refers to his wife, Nora by using pet names, which in returns weakens her character image. This type of behavior from Torvald makes it's clear that he will never incorporate Nora's or her opinion with any situation that is of great importance, such as the finances and he doesn't allow her to hold any responsibility other than being a housewife and his pet. This behavior between a husband and a wife was typical during this period. Torvald is the money maker, he is employed at a rather large bank and makes a decent salary. He tells his wife ""It's so gratifying to know that one's gotten a safe, secure job, and with a comfortable salary."" He's apparently satisfied with his self-image and his reputation, how he appears to everyone else is important to him that's why he didn't want to take out the loan. He's also so caught up in his reputation that he disapproved of Krogstad working at the bank because his character is a widower with small children and Torvald thinks he is incapable of raising children to own his own.

Once the Ibsen established Torvald and Nora's stereotypical gender personality traits in the play, he decides to reverse them. He displays that strength, weakness, stability, impulsivity, and logic are all human traits not necessarily traits associated with gender roles. Ibsen shows that these traits are held and displayed equally by both genders and that neither gender has more of one quality than the other. Nora finally realizes that her gender is her downfall and is the reason she is unable to have the fulfilling life she desires. ""Nora's claim that she is 'first and foremost a human being' (Moi, T. 2006, p.274) She attempts to discuss her feelings about their marriage with Torvald You don't understand me. And I've never understood you either-until tonight.We've been married now eight years. Doesn't it occur to you that this is the first time, we two, you and I, man and wife, have ever talked seriously together?' (Isben) Nora, unlike her stereotypical emotionally unstable female character remains calm when she tells him I'm a human being, no less than you-or anyway, I ought to try to come one (Isben) Her comments to her husband demonstrations that she considers her duties as his wife and mother to their children to be her human responsibilities, not responsibilities that should be defined to her just because she is a woman.

In ""A Doll's House,"" Ibsen keeps the setting close to the real-life situations that married couples encountered during the Victorian period. The play depicts the struggle of women encountered to obtain their independence aside from their husbands. Ibsen's teaches the audiences that individuals must be able to view themselves as human beings and be capable of taking care of themselves despite what society deems proper for them at the time. ""A Doll's House"" is Ibsen's effort for a social revolution not only for women but also for every human. He displays that masculinity is lost as the female gender desires to become more independent. However, the power struggle between the two genders will continue he notes in the play that it is perfectly acceptable for men to share their power with women.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gender Roles in Literature. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

How People Adaptation to Gender Roles

Introduction

In this project I will talk about the observations I made and how people seem to adapt to gender roles, how they get them, and what effect they seem to have on society. I hope to cover all these things.

My Observations

While I was observing Lego League I noticed that the girls and the boys seemed to be pretty different, the girls seemed to play with more of the Lego dolls and the pink things, also while wearing more pink and purple clothes, the way they were playing was very Let's brush this one's hair and things among that type, while the boys on the other hand seemed to like the blues, black, and reds. With the boys I saw a lot of helicopters and some planes, but they did seem to be pretty split on gender, but not very aware of it, I don't think I even heard the word boy or girl. Also while they did seem pretty split up they didn't really seem to think anything of it, they didn't tease each other. Behaviorally the girls seemed pretty chilled out and not very girly, some of the boys seemed to be trying to seem cool, but the others also seemed pretty chilled out in gender roles.

What Are Gender Roles?

Gender roles are ideas that people have in their mind that are things like girl colors or boy colors or women staying at home and men going out to get money. Some people have different gender roles in their family or their household, for example, if the woman is always taking care of the child all the time, that would be a gender role that someone might have in their head, but there are traditional gender roles, like girls wearing pink and staying home and boys wearing black and suits.

Gender Roles In Children

Studies have found that in children, by around age two children have recognized physical differences between males and females, by around age 3 they are able to easily label themselves as boy or girl, and by age 4 children have usually figured out their gender identity (Rafferty). However this can vary from society, if a society is very liberal or conservative could have effects, how work is split up in the household, or any small thing that mom or dad does can have an effect on a child and how they believe gender might be split up intentionally, for example, if the mother is always doing dishes, the child will subconsciously think that that's something that is very regular and if they aren't taught something else or exposed to other things they will carry that through on in life and if they get married they might institute that and then their kid might have the same impression but maybe flipped. When people are in a household with stricter gender roles and they tend to be pushed on the child, people call these gender straightjackets, because the child is sort of stuck in a house with gender roles until of course they are 18 and are able to make decisions for themselves how they'd like to interpret gender roles into their adult life (Luscombe).

Global Comparisons

Gender roles come from many different places depending on which region of the world you live in, Iceland, you have a very small chance of believing that men and women are entitled to different jobs (3.6%), however if you live in Egypt, that thought it quite common (94.9%), however different countries also have different reasons for believing this and many, many factors, including current leaders and their political views or views on the gender situation in particular, they might make or enforce previous laws that go against women in the workplace or what jobs women can choose to have, if any, or if it's a previous leader, they might have put in place laws that people agreed with but just never really thought about if it was discriminatory or, not so they just sort of kept that law (Weziak-Bialowolska). There are other factors though, all of country history can play into it, global politics, many, many things that you wouldn't think had things to do with it, it's kinda like if you were never born the world would be so much different, you might not think so, but there would be. In terms of which countries have more or less harsh gender roles in society, the U.S. is pretty good, and is about the 16th best country for full gender equality, while most of Scandinavia, France, Ireland Germany all rank higher than that, with Denmark being the top country in gender equality. Some worse countries for gender rights and equality would be India, Algeria, Jordan, South Korea, and Egypt, and perhaps the worst, Saudi Arabia, these countries are all ranked among the worst of gender equality in countries, these studies are based off laws about what jobs a woman can have and punishment sentences for sexual assault or misconduct.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

How People Adaptation to Gender Roles. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gender: Organic and Sexual Contrasts Among People

Gender alludes to the organic and sexual contrasts among people, which are generally physiological and anatomical. Most individuals only recognize two gender types, which are the male and female gender. The term Gender role generally describes an arrangement of social and conduct standards or obligations viewed as proper for people of a given sex. Gender roles and the jobs performed by each gender vary broadly. This emerges in light of the fact that gender roles are developed and supported socially. This social-cultural development of gender roles and jobs performed by each gender may mirror the regular desire of each gender.

There has been considerable disparity in gender roles over cultural and the past period, and all gender roles are culturally and historically reliant. Much of academic work and researches on gender roles addresses the dispute over the ecological or genetic causes for the development of gender roles. Gender roles have always been an issue of contention in the society. This is because, since the commencement of life, man dominated over the woman and this has been stereotyped for ages. From the creation period, it can be witnessed that the role of that the man was bestowed with as far as the family was concerned, man was the final decision maker, the only person to rely on in terms of security and the breadwinner. On the other hand, the woman was bestowed with the role and responsibility of taking care of the home. Her role was to give her husband beneficiaries and to take care of the family through her food preparation, stitching clothes for them, nurturing the young, nursing the sick among other minor roles. This ideology has undoubtedly been passed on through generations up to date. However, as time went by and especially with the launching of the wars across borders, this long trend took another direction because of the fact that the men had to move out of the house and leave the family under the care of the mother. Consequently, the mother was left with the responsibilities that the husband is always entangled with. This was apparently the beginning and embrace of change in the American society. Today's development and remarkable transformation as far as social, political, and economical values are concerned can utterly be credited to the significant roles that the women and men of America played since independence. Notably, there has been a paradigm shift in the roles and responsibilities between the men and women of today.

However, even after the American Revolution, and with the shifting of roles in the social structure, women were still regarded as weak creatures, in consequence, they were not allowed to take part in jobs that were considered to be hard, rather such jobs were only relevant to men in the society. Women were given jobs such as working in big offices headed by men to work for them as secretaries, bar attendants or waitresses, and tailors, but were not allowed to play a part in any important job especially where the main task was about making key decision apropos the situation at hand. Women were raised to believe that they were not as viable as the men were, and that there were some careers that they could not perform. However, this has changed over time through the introduction of innovation and additionally generous substantial work from women's activist battling for the privileges of woman in society's public eye. Today, women have taken on big jobs to manage big firms as chief executive officers, managers, and other top rated jobs. Women have even gone to the extent of running their own companies as they have gone to school and indeed meet the required criteria for qualifications in many jobs that could otherwise be given to men. All this is given credit to the women of civil rights who advocated equality and persistently appeared in many civil rights movements to rally the support of the constitution for equal treatment of all genders. For instance, a female chief executive officer-Meg Whitman leads one of the leading computer hardware developers-the Hewlett Packard.

Economic developments have greatly contributed an imperative role in the change of roles taken by men and women in the contemporary society. The economic trends have proved too demanding, and women have to work in different fields that were considered to be only dominated by men such as the construction of houses, driving of commercial vehicles among others in a bid to help their men financially. This is because, at some particular point in life, situations grow hard and life becomes too expensive that it demands women to engage in small jobs to supplement the revenue that men earn from work. This has changed everything accordingly since women have discovered that given the same chance as men, they could also succeed in their careers as well as continue helping out in the home. Today, women work on a similar podium as men. Women are contending with men in all occupations, and some even earn more than men in their workplaces do. Accordingly, Klein (2007) asserts that women have adopted the role as breadwinners for their families as some have even been able to raise their own families as single mothers in the event of divorce of a deceased husband. Women have stopped sitting at home and have realized their potentials and developed ways of embracing their roles as wives and mothers while they also cling on their careers. Certainly, today, there is no explicit role that is meant for a man or a woman. Both seem equal in all fronts as many continue to advance to greater heights in competing with men, probably showing the men that what they can, women can do it as well. For example, some women in the United States of America have immensely joined the army leaving their husbands at home to take care of their children while others have become engineers, pilots and many other jobs that were considered relevant for men manly during the past years.

Men have also changed in the roles they partake as it witnessed in today's life whereby, men are increasingly taking up jobs in avenues that were earlier considered a woman's realm. Today, we have men as outstanding chefs, designers and tailors among other fields of jobs that were regarded as women's. Indeed, men have acknowledged the inevitable changes that have transformed the society and made it as it is today. Even in many of the American families, men take the initiative of cooking for the whole family regardless of the wife's presence. This is because, people have realized and acknowledged that all people are equal and no task is explicitly designed for a particular gender. Consequently, young boys have even learnt how to cook and prepare certain meals that only women knew how to prepare before. It is not a surprise to encounter such a scenario in the contemporary society since men have wholly embraced the roles that were once considered to be dominated by women. Lang (1998) confirms that men also engage in laundry and dishwashing regardless of the presence of their women as it has become imperative for people to share chores. Furthermore, many men express contempt and satisfaction helping their wives while they are available at home. The revolutionary nature of the social structure of gender has been gradual and more definite with people realizing the reality that they need to share work in a bid to live well. Before, men took up women's roles out of obligation but societal changes have demanded men to engage in women's roles even when they have their wives to do the same roles.

It is was believed that only men can engage in some games such as Tie Kwon Do , football, wrestling among other famous games known to be participated only by men. However, today, women have actively taken a keen interest in such games and they compete amongst themselves. For instance, a few decades ago, there used to be no women playing football as it was only meant for men. Times have changed and up to today, there are football clubs known to belong to women. Furthermore, just like men's football world cup tournament, women also have their own world cup football tournament that is held differently from that of men. In addition, women have also taken part in the key roles in football that would rather be dominated by men. Women referees are seen in the pitch even in the men's football games. Notwithstanding the active participation in various dangerous games that are only believed to be for men such as the American vintage among other games. Additionally, women have been seen participating in Olympic Games, which were considered to be for men. Women have unrelentingly fought by all means for equality and this could be the time they have become even with men where they no longer fear to engage in heavy tasks despite the fact that it has often been an obvious notion that women do not fit in certain games and/or sports. They consider a fair ground competition with men while trying to prove them wrong that whatever they can be good at, women can as well be part of the same.

In the past, only men were able to go to grammar schools and achieve a college education if their families could afford to support him. However, education today has completely changed enormously owing to the change in the role that men and women of today undertake. Klein (2007) clarifies that unlike in the early days where women were taught at home about management skills, and later on graduate to teach others; today women are taught the same skills that were taught to men giving them the same chance and opportunity to favorably compete in the same job market. Women are well informed and acquitted about their rights and hence they are able to make sound and informed decisions regarding the track they wish to pursue in their lives. Through education, gender inequality has been done away with and has often discouraged stereotyping where both men and women have learnt to value each other's outlook as they both count in different perspective. Besides, the financial independence has pushed many women to work hard in schools and colleges in a bid to succeed and look for good jobs that will make them have the financial freedom. Women have felt the need for financially independence even when they get married. Therefore, most women have joined many colleges and have been employed in different organizations before they get married. This has been necessitated by the fact that there have been numerous changes in the family values and moral crumble that has overwhelmed the today's society as far as divorces among other immoral behaviors are concerned. The effect of this is that women feel that they need a backing plan in the event where their marriage fails to work. Education that was once seen as an area only meant for men has become widely reliable by women of today. Women have embraced education not only in America but also in many parts of the globe as they have realized that education is the perfect weapon to fight men and a favorable means of getting even with men.

In the past, only men were allowed to participate in government and be elected as leaders. Men were the only people who were given chances to participate fully in their civil rights such as the freedom to participate in voting. Women were not considered to take any decision as far as taking part in election was concerned. Women were not allowed to exercise their voting rights nor were they allowed to take up any leadership position. That is, men filled all leadership positions and the political dynasty viewed women as interlopers who had no right to take any active role in leadership. Nowadays, have realized that they can potentially take up leadership roles and lead others well just as men do. For instance, successful women such as Hilary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice among others have set a perfect example for young upcoming female leaders. They have revealed to the world that women can make it irrespective of their femininity and in the field of leadership; they have disapproved the long held catchphrase that women cannot lead men. In addition, the colonial society was intensely patriarchal, whereby men enjoyed power in both private and public life. They had the mandate to make decision as well as solve disputes within the family. However, Lang (1998) agrees that this role has also been transferred to women, as women feel confident and strong enough to make decisions. In the early days, women were beaten up by their husbands, disrespected in the home before the children who grew up exposed to violence and turmoil of their mother, and their contribution was barely regarded to be significant. They had no chance to make any key decision, which was exclusively done by the husband and men in the society. However, women of today are more vocal in the home, and they now have the mandate to make sound decisions apropos the family. Furthermore,

In the past, women had no right to own property and therefore, they had no role of taking care of any property. Property ownership was only bestowed to man had the role of taking care of the property to ensure its safety and security. The children of belonged to the men and the women could not call the children their own while the father was still alive. In today's social structures, women own their own property ranging from land to businesses. They have the role of taking care of their own businesses as well as have the right to call their children their own. For instance, some women nowadays prefer to bare their own children, raise, and take care of them without the help of a man. In such a scenario, women have had to take care of their children, meet their need, demands and aspirations in life just like the father would have done. In addition, women have had the opportunity to inherit their father's property unlike in the past when only men were eligible for such a beneficiary. The notion that a woman does not own anything in the family is long forgotten and their contribution for the success of the family has become very important to an extent that men have valued their presence. Men have positively endeavored to acknowledge the contribution that their women have towards the success of the family through the regular support that the mother has to her family. This has even given birth to the prominent catchphrase that behind every successful man, there is a woman behind. There are even certain cases where women have resorted to adopting children from their biological mothers and taking the responsibility of providing all necessities for the children. For example, a popular film star-Angelina Jolie has legally adopted more than two children who she provides with everything as if they were her own born children.

The changes in the society have also contributed to the emergence of gay fathers. Today, more and more gay men continue to live their lives in the open without any traces of fear. Gay men have often sought to establish enduring, loyal, and affectionate relationships and like heterosexual couples, gay couples are beginning to start families of their own and certainly live a life they wish to pursue. With the escalating numbers of gay fathers in today's society, it is possible that, such individuals are prone to dividing the work as far as childcare is concerned. Just like other heterosexual families, gay fathers will have to accept the responsibility of taking care of the children, as would have their biological mother(s). Mothers were entrusted with the roles and responsibilities of cooking for the family, however, in such a scenario, the gay father is liable in ensuring that the child gets motherly care without mistreating or mishandling the child. Besides, the fact that they are gay men justifies the fact that the role of genders in America has changed drastically. Men of this nature have, therefore no otherwise than to embrace the roles that are meant for women. This has contributed at a greater extent on the changing roles of the genders not only in America but also in different countries and continents.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion has clearly unveiled that the role of the genders has greatly contributed to the growth and development of the United States since it gained his independence from the British. Men and women who fought for their liberty made a significant impact to the today's common American citizen. With the dynamic nature of the society, people's roles have shifted in such a way that what the other could not do in a few decades ago, they now freely engage and participate in them. The report reveals that, even after the remarkable American Revolution, women had no freedom to engage freely in economic activities to earn themselves a living. However, a few elite women advocated equality through organized civil rights movements that saw a true revolution that was indeed revolutionary. Today, roles have completely reversed as people advance into very sophisticated ways of life characterized by numerous unpredictable changes. As far as the social, cultural and political setup is concerned, both sexes have increasingly competed for the key roles within some particular areas of interest because of the fact that both men and women have learned to thrive within the same environment. The adoption of man is said to be equal to man as women become more aware and aggressive to embracing the roles that were considered to be dominated by the male. On the other hand, changes of situations have demanded the adjustment of roles undertaken by men and this has seen a dramatic change in the roles that men engage in. for instance, the report has clearly depicted that indeed, men have also shifted into roles that were considered part of women. In the clubs, there are waiters and waitresses serving people and even in the kitchen, men are seen to be the best chefs and cooks unlike it was in the early time.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gender: Organic and Sexual Contrasts Among People. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Effects of Gender Roles during the Great Depression and World War 2

A role or behavior learned by a person as appropriate to their gender which is determined by the prevailing cultural norms is called a gender role. Both men and women have been told how to behave, dress, and how to present oneself to the public. An example of gender roles in society is women are supposed to be feminine, graceful, polite, nurturing, emotional, take care of kids, cook, clean; while men are supposed to be muscular, aggressive, tall, take care of finances, do repairs. These are gender roles that society puts on us, but these gender roles are also considered stereotypical. With this day in age nobody really follows these gender roles. There are many men who take care of kids, cook, clean, are nurses, and much more, just like there are women who do repairs, finances, are muscular, etc. While I'm are talking about gender roles, I want to talk about the effects of gender roles during the great depression and the cold war, and if there were any similarities or differences between them.

Reaching its lowest point in history the Great Depression caused over 15 million Americans became unemployed as well as half of the country's banks failed. But what caused the Great Depression. Well as the U.S. economy started to increase swiftly it caused the nation's total wealth to triple between 1920-1929 causing this period in history to be labeled the Roaring Twenties. In NYC there was a stock market in the middle of Wall Street at the New York stock exchange. The stock market was where you could see all types of people such as multimillionaires to janitors, and even cooks pour all their savings into stocks. Due to everyone pouring their savings into stocks the stock market noticed a speedy change which caused it to reach its peak in 1929 of August. As an outcome, unemployment started to increase, compared to their real value stock prices increased, as well as productions started to decline. On top of that banks had an overabundance of substantial loans that couldn't be dissolved, plummeting food prices and dry spells were affecting agriculture sectors, employment salaries were cut-rate, and buyer's debt increased in size.

In the summer of 1929, the U.S. economy infiltrated a vague recession as a result of products being unsold, consumers slowly stopped making purchases, and stocks continued to grow. October 24, 1929, the stock market crashed as many had feared. Known as Black Thursday many investors were selling their shares in which it made a record 12.9 million of shares being traded that day. On October 29, 1929 also known as Black Tuesday another panic brushed Wall Street causing 16 million shares being exchanged, and millions being worthless. Investors were slaughtered entirely for when they purchased stocks on margin. As buyers trust began to disappear because of the crash, many occupations started to release their employees due to lack of production. The ones who were still employed struggled with payments and power. Those who were forced to pay with credit eventually ended up in debt, which made the number of foreclosures and repossessions to increase. Although President Hoover tried to reassure everyone that the catastrophe their facing would eventually pass, the matter only got worst over the course of the next three years causing the number of 4 million Americans who were looking for work in 1930 to rise to 6 million in 1931. Homelessness and soup kitchen became extremely common throughout America. Even farmers were forced to leave their crops to rot because they could no longer afford to harvest them, so that left people starving. In between the years of 1931 to 1933 thousands of banks ended up closing due to an abundant number of investors feeling like they couldn't stay with their banks, so they started to demand for deposits which cause banks to liquidate loans in order to meet the investors needs.

In order to help the situation, President Hoover tried to help the banks that were failing with government loans. Hoover was hoping that banks could help take those loans to businesses to help hire people. In 1932, Franklin D. Roosevelt became president, that following year the last remainder of banks throughout the United States were instructed to shut down due to the government unable to pay their workers, but that didn't stop Roosevelt. He immediately sprung into action by closing all the banks in order to have Congress pass reform legislation. He would also have fireside chats over the radio to help restore the public's confidence. Well within his first 100 days the legislation passed, and aimed to stabilize production, create jobs, and the economy recover. It called it The New Deal. The New Deal would a series of programs to help the road to recovery. Some of the programs he created were the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, to protect accounts, the Securities and Exchange Commission which would help control the stock market so that another stock market crash could be avoided. As well as the Tennessee Valley Authority which was to control flooding and to provide power to the Tennessee Valley region, the Work Progress Administration provided permanent jobs to 8.5 million people in 1935-1943. Lastly in 1935 he created the Social Security Act which provides unemployment, disability and pensions for senior citizens.

In spring of 1933, the economy started showing signs of improvement for the next three years. Although in 1937 there was a slight recession, the Great Depression ended in 1939. Now that we know about the Great Depression how were gender roles effected? Well, back in the 1900s the typical gender roles were that men were the breadwinner, and women stayed home, but during the Great Depression things were different for women. Men were predominantly in one's favor over women when it came to be being employed, which made it difficult for women to find jobs, but due to the stock market crash women were able to break their stereotypical role of being a housewife to becoming a breadwinner. Women were payed noticeably less then men, which is why men were considered breadwinners, but because women were payed lower than men, they were able to find jobs better. Especially, if it had to due with technology such as radios and telephones, that's where their job opportunities expanded. This continued throughout the 1930s. Jobs such as nursing, teaching, operating were other worked opportunities for women. For teachers, sometimes they couldn't get payed on time, and even had their paychecks lowered, but being the only income, they received women were the breadwinners.

The Great Depression became a time in history were male employment declined, while female employment increased, and by 1940, 13 million women were working. Because of the stereotypical gender role society during this time many were claiming that women were robbing men of jobs that they needed. Because of this society, in 1932-1937 there was a federal law placed saying that it is illegal for more than one person per family to contain a job within federal civil service.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Effects of Gender Roles During the Great Depression and World War 2. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Hominoid Gender Roles

Introductory

In early times there were our ancestors, consisting of both male and female organisms. Roles that were laid out for both early ancestors then, were passed down to generations from Australopithecus, to Homo Habilis, to Homo erectus, to Neanderthal, and to Homo Sapiens. Our early ancestors may have had distinct roles that mismatch today's ideal gender roles of males doing the work while females are stay-at home nurturing the children. According to some research articles, our early ancestors may have had males that were stay-at home while females do the roaming looking for food and shelter. Some may even say that at a certain point of evolution, both genders did the same thing as in roaming, killing and finding shelter. Now that did progressively change individually for the ancestors listed in the beginning of this introductory paragraph. Australopithecus to Homo Sapiens were bipedal meaning that their legs were straight and purposely for walking. These gender roles were highly determined by the landscapes or environments that our early ancestors were living in. Walking on two feet and having two upper limbs (arms) to help the individual do other things is beneficial whereas most early ancestors were quadrupedal meaning that they use all for limbs for self-transportation.

Body

Beginning with Australopithecus, the first of its species were discovered by an Archeologist by the name of Donald Johansson when he found Lucy; an Australopithecus Afarnesis. These species were dated back to roughly 3 and a half Million years ago and had an average brain size of about 400 cc. The pelvis and lower limbs of these species clearly indicates that they were fully bipedal: the pelvis is short and bowl-shaped, bringing the gluteal muscles around to the side of the body, likewise modern humans, for trunk stabilization during bipedalism, and the first toe is in line with the other toes (Ward, 2002; Harcourt-Smith and Aiello, 2004). Both genders of this species were similar, however recent studies showed that they may have been having roles that differ the ideal gender roles we have today. According to a study by the University of Colorado Boulder, they have indicated that the male Australopithecus were stay-at-home while the females do the food hunting and roaming around. Using a method called laser ablation, they zapped the hominid teeth for them to find and measure isotope ratios of strontium that were located in the tooth enamel. Strontium is found in rocks and soils then are absorbed by plants and animals. Working as a food chain, the plants and animals are therefore consumed by the organisms. Harnessing the strontium isotope ratios will indicate the direct reflection of the foods that these hominids ate, which in turn reflects the local geology (Copeland 2011). The research was done by studying both Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus individuals from two adjacent cave systems in South Africa known as Sterkfontein and Swartkans. The research concluded that males likely grew up and died in the same are while more than half of the female teeth were from outside of the local area.

Homo habilis, also known as the handy man, were dated back to 1.4 million through 2.3 years ago. They were considered the oldest member of the genus Homo, H. habilis and were discovered in 1960 by Louis Leaky and Mary Leaky in East Africa. They were averaging at 4 feet tall and a larger brain capacity size of 640cc. The nick name handy man were given to Homo Habilis because of their craftiness in creating tools utilizing stone for butchering animal meat/bones and using animal bone for digging. In a documentary video called Becoming Human, Paleoanthropologist Brian Richmond discusses of how stones were chipped where it became sharpened for the purpose of cutting into some kind of food. Richmond showed evidence of some dated animal bones where there were clear cut marks which correlates to usage of the chipped rocks to get to the marrow. Compared to the Australopithecus, Homo habilis's brain size is far greater indicating that there is an expansion of cognitive capacity (Richmond). This may have been the reason behind the specie's reasoning of breaking rocks into sharper objects to cut food and etc. In regards of their greater cognitive capabilities, they had the intelligence to make tools to find food maybe even scavenging amongst others for food. As of now, it is debatable to determine the gender roles of Homo habilis because of little to no evidence on this species.

Homo Erectus, known as the Up Right Man existed approximately 1.8 million to 200,000 years ago. According to a website by the name of humanorigins.si.edu, Homo erectus lived in Africa and Asia. Discovered in 1891 by Eugene Dubois, a Dutch surgeon while he was in Indonesia. The specie's first name was Pithecanthropus, then later adopted the name Homo Erectus because of their straight torso. Its name was tossed around because its finding across two continents. So far, this was the tallest hominoid specie yet and also had the larger brain size of 900cc. Early members of this species have cranial capacities between 600-800 cm3, but most later Homo erectus exceed 1000 cm3, which falls within the lower range seen in our own species (Groeneveld 2017). Based on its appearances, it resembles humans more than any of the other kind of early ancestors. The Up-Right Man were good walkers and as well as runners. They also were known to have survived the longest because of their knowledge of food hunting, crafty tools, shelter building and discovery of fire. Many scientists believe that Homo Erectus ate more meat than the early hominids because of fire. In a website article on austrilianmuseum.et.au, the Exhibition Project Coordinator Fran Dorey talked of how analyzing burnt stones, animal bones, charcoal and ash deposits were the components that led scientists to believe that the Homo erectus were the very first to discover and use the element fire. Of course, using fire to cook food, warm their people during cold nights, social interactions and scaring away predators played a major part in their survival. According to humanorigins.si.edu, the creation of large tools such as hand axes and cleavers increased reliance during climate changes. These traits that they have contributed to their productive lifestyle in which prolonged their kind from 2 million years to about 100,000 years ago. Even so, there isn't much details about gender roles for this group of species that scientists are able to find but it is certain that some social interactions were made.

Moving onto Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis or Neanderthals, they were living from 230,000 to just about 30,000 years ago. Discovered in 1829 but was not recognized until 1864 when it became the first Hominin species to be named Homo Neanderthalensis by Geologist William King (Johanson and Edgar, 2006). They are our closest extinct human relatives. Their body structures were almost identical and had same size brains as that of modern humans however, they were shorter and were not in the same family tree as us. The Neanderthals lived mainly in Europe and Southwestern to Central Asia. These species of hominoids were more developed than any of the other previous hominoids. According to humanorigins.si.edu, the Neanderthals were very intelligent and crafty with their sophisticated handy tools, controlling fire, build/lived in shelters and even wore clothing. Hearths were built for cooking and warmth while skins of animals were used as clothing. They advanced their hunting tools and greatly improved their weapons such as attaching sharpened rocks onto long sticks. This group was to be known as the first group to have an organized hunting group where they worked together to surround and take down large animals. Like humans, they had burials, arts and decoration but just not as developed. With the knowledge of the Neanderthals organized hunting groups, presumably is this when the gender roles start to take place where the men will go off finding food while the women stayed behind and nurture their younglings? Not according to a New York Times article by Nicholas Wade, saying that women did not just stay at home watching over kids while men hunt for food. Wades reasoning had to do with the bone evidence of a female Neanderthal and her robust built arguing that there has to be a reason why the females bone structures were built like the men. This is however debatable because it may have had to do with genetics. The later existing population did meet with the Homo Sapiens and a hand full of them did interbreed across species. As closely modernized as they were, they became extinct due to the harsh climates of their time.

Lastly, there are the Homo Sapiens Sapien also known as the Doubly Wise Men. They are the earliest and closest species to the human race existing from 35,000 BCE to 12,000 BCE. Characteristics about these modernized cavemen where that they were even more skilled and advanced in hunting, tools, communication, arts, etc. The first cave painting site was discovered in 1979 having used blood, dirt, clay and rocks to draw animals/people. Hunting has greatly improved as they have additional support for throwing spears, making hooks for fishing, bow and arrow. According to humansorigin.si.edu, just after 12,000 years ago, Homo Sapiens decided to transition from hunting to producing food as they discovered how to breed animals and grow plants. This led to farming and herding animals that transformed earth's entire shape as populations grow bigger and bigger forming villages, to towns, to cities, to entire countries. As things were escalating, gender roles start to surface. Men still are the ones to do the big game hunting to provide food, looking for shelter, keeping the family warm, and etc. Women still are the ones to stay at home, cook for the children, nurture and watch them grow into men and women.

In today's ideal gender roles, Men are the hard-worker that provides for his family and the backbone that holds the family together while women are to be at home with the kids. It has been so for hundreds of years and Society has grown into this defaulted role for both genders to act a certain and that if they do not then are considered rebellious or frowned upon. This goes far throughout all the human races regardless of color around the world. Some people may argue that Men are built to lead, and women are just followers of men, but some may disapprove. Taking a look at prehistoric species from Australopithecus, to Homo habilis, to Homo erectus, to Neanderthal, and to Homo sapiens, there were times were females hominids did aid male hominids in male duties but there was not enough evidence to prove that female's roles were distinctly different millions of years ago. The gender roles we had currently, are implemented for a reason and that reason is because it has been passed down so that is how it has always been since the early ages. Although, the idea has implemented humans to think highly of men and lowly of women. There are many problems with this kind of mentality because it creates social disparities between each gender. Comparing the 1900s to the 1950s to today, times are gradually changing where society is becoming more aware of social justice and shining away from the default gender roles. People can become or act as they want such as men finally being able to start showing emotions without being labeled as weak individuals and women taking part in manly duties without being criticized being out of place.

Conclusion

In this discussion, I talked about our early hominoid ancestor's gender roles from Australopithecus, to Homo habilis, to Homo erectus, to Neanderthal, and to Homo sapiens. Majority of those dated too far back in history that it is nearly impossible to determine their specific gender roles. The only group of hominoids that I was able to get intel on where the more modernized species such as Neanderthal through Homo Sapiens. Having knowledge of only those species, I was able to determine that men were the food gatherers while women nurtured the younglings at home. Gender roles of our early ancestors are highly debated because it greatly affects us today and people's curiosities inspire them to seek answers on origins of gender roles.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Hominoid Gender Roles. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gender Identity and Roles

Despite all the past struggles of our ancestors to reach equality, there is only a fake sense of it. After the turn of the century people expected to have a peaceful balance between everyone despite all the differences. However, gender roles in society- along with men's genetic makeup and economic power- suggest that men are superior over women. Even now, humans allow societal created gender roles that dictate their fate.

Our society, although technology progressed, has not changed much in the aspect of gender being the main source of power. The forcing of such views has hindered, or interfered, with a woman's path to gaining social or economic power such as becoming a CEO or the President since both are male predominated. Men have a general advantage due to the societal structure, which enables them to reach higher paying jobs and positions. According to Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics By Raewyn W. Connell In Australia,... men hold 86 percent of the jobs as administrators, executives and managers but only 28 percent of clerical jobs...[Page 10] This gives evidence that men have higher status jobs than lower ones, which gives them more economic power. Another point connell made was [Women] work mainly outside the cash economy, in housework, child rearing, subsistence agriculture, or labour for a husband or father...[Page 10]. The gender role society has created burdens women with the task of taking care of the housework or children, which hinders their ability to work a full time job. This is one of many reasons why women cannot overcome the social structure of the economy and achieve equal economic or social power as men. In the rare occurrence that women do overcome these obstacles and go into professions suited for men, they are ostracized or even harassed claims Dr. Ruth Simpsons in 'Masculinity at Work: Experiences if Men in Female Dominated Occupations'. These incidents further discourage women to pursue these type of jobs that society deemed strictly for men.

One may argue women lead in other professions, but they are mostly trivial positions such as nurses or teachers. Connell states, in the United States ..., 97 percent of registered nurses and 94 percent of elementary teachers within this group were women[Page 10] These positions don't hold much economic power as lets say a CEO, which are mostly men. Society has labeled these jobs as feminine, and its rare seeing men in these positions. Usually if a male goes into the field of education, they tend to be coaches or Principles. Nursing also has a similar view in terms of feminist as teaching since it holds a sense of nurturing or care taking. In an Article written by Karrie Ann Snyder, they show that males who do enter nursing, tend to gravitate toward areas they perceive to be more masculine. The stereotype given to these jobs supports the idea that society labels lesser status jobs for women, while higher paying jobs or positions are mostly reserved for males.

The ideology of men being the superior gender is not only supported by the gender roles society created, but also their genetic makeup. According to some therosist, men bore a natural masculinity which developed during evolution. In another work by Robert W. Connell, she states Heavy manual work calls for strength, endurance, a degree of insensitivity and toughness, and group solidarity. Emphasizing the masculinity of industrial labour has been both a means of survival, in exploitative class relations, and a means of asserting superiority over women Since men are genetically stronger than women, they use this to their advantage and try to dominate women. The biology of men give them a natural sense of masculinity in which they incompase into their work and life since the feel a need to be the provider or the authoritative figure both at home or at work. Connell also says others claim that current social arrangements are an outgrowth of the endocrine system: for instance, that patriarchy is based in a hormonal 'aggression advantage' which men hold over women.[Page 47] This genetic component reinforces men's thoughts of women being inferior to them, therefor society created gender roles in favor of men.

The centering concepts of masculinity and femininity in gender roles may be common throughout cultures. Males have been given a sense of authority by social roles, which disables women to be viewed as equal. The mindset that women are inferior to men can be traced back into our childhood and history. These unchanging socially created roles have limited the growth of our society due to them controlling important aspects of our lives.

Citations

Chapter 2 Men's Body. Masculinities, by Raewyn Connell, 2nd ed., Polity, 2016, pp. 45-56.

Connell, Raewyn. Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford Univ. Press, 2004.

Simp, Ruth. Masculinity at Work: The Experiences of Men in Female Dominated Occupations. Work Employment and Society, vol. 18, Brunel University, 2004, pp. 2-15.

Karrie Ann Snyder, Adam Isaiah Green; Revisiting the Glass Escalator: The Case of Gender Segregation in a Female Dominated Occupation, Social Problems, vol. 55, Issue 2, 1 May 2008, pp. 271“299.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gender Identity and Roles. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

White and Slave Gender Roles

The book Harriet A. Jacob's Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl is an autobiography about her life as a slave girl. She described her childhood living with her grandmother and her grandmother's mistress. Then it all changed when her grandmother mistress died and she was sold off to the mistress's son, Dr. Flint. Her life started to become dark and then became darker when she got pregnant. She then did everything in her power to ensure that her children get their freedom. She went against Dr. Flint and was in great distress on the consequence she got into when they manage to get her. She pretended to go to the North but was hiding in a small cramped crawlspace in her grandmother's house. There she saw through a small hole her children grow up without them ever knowing where she was. In the crawlspace, there was no light except the little peek hole she made, no heater or air conditioning so summer where hot and sweaty and winters were freezing cold, and the air was very thin. All her friends and family tried to hide the fact where she is. They all provided her things she needed while she stayed in the crawlspace like food, water, blankets, and etc. They were times at night they would allow her to go to the storage room so she can stretch her limbs since it's so crapped up in the crawlspace. Dr. Flint was determined to find Jacob and bring her back. He sold her children to another man and that man set them free. The children then lived with there grandmother. She hid in the crawlspace from Dr. Flint and anyone who would try to turn her in for seven years. But all was worth the trouble because she managed to move to New York and reunite with her children as freed slaves. In this paper, I am going to argue how Jacob's book illustrates how gender roles in both white and slave, for men and women, are formed based on work, families, and power.

One way, we can see gender role construction in Jacob's book is white men worked while white women stayed at home. The same goes for slaves, the men worked hard labor, on the plantations, while women stayed at the masters home. The slave women would take care of the masters' children. They stayed beside their master, mistress, or masters children and be ready to aid them whenever they're needed. Slaves had to be obedient to their masters. If slaves ever go against their masters they would get punished, either by getting beaten up or starved. There are times they would just sell them if the master is ever tired of them. The way slaves are treated causes them to want to try to run away to the North where they can be free. Some succeed but some are captured by slave hunters and be sent back to their masters where they would get punished for trying to run away. When slave get punished some survive the punishment but some would die in the process, that how badly they were treated. The whites aren't afraid to kill a slave especially a slave man. The slave tends to try to protect the slave women because they produce the next generation of slaves.

Another way, we can see gender role construction in Jacob's book is through families. There are a lot of ups and down when it comes to family, both white and slaves. There are white men who go behind their wives and have affairs with a slave woman. This causes a lot of slave women to get pregnant and make the wifes upset. The wives have to carry the burden of being cheated on, no by another white woman but by a slave woman, so they get jealous. It causes the wives to want to harm the slave women or just get rid of her, but the master is the one that decides what to do with the slave. Slave women are forced to keep the secret of who the father of the baby or it will ruin the white family reputation. Slave families don't live together forever. When a child is born into a slave family they are already considered as slaves. When the children reach a certain age the slave women or men's master put the slave children into an auction. Slaves family when separated they never get to see each other again. Whenever a slave wants to get married, they have to get the condolences of their master.

Finally, we can see gender role construction in Jacob's book is by power. Men have power, especially white men, they control the entire household. Anything that someone in the family or the slaves want to do something or wants to go out, they have to ask the head of the household permission, meaning the men. Men own the property, they pay the bills and provide for the family. The women are there to support the family by taking care of them. Slave men protect their families but they don't have power than the white men do. White men consider slaves as property than as human beings. Women can't go against their husbands, they have to support them in any way necessary. The children are taught the same way. Once the children are married, the sons become the head of their household and the daughter provide for the family by cooking, cleaning, and etc. Slaves, both men and women, don't have the same rights as the white people, they are there to serve them. And it goes the same for slave children. Once the children come to an age where they can be auctioned they will follow the same rules as their parents and every slave that lives in the South. That is why a lot of slaves try to escape to the North, so their children won't have to go through what they went through.

In Jacob's book, it illustrates how slaves lived through her eyes as a slave. Its know that slaves don't know how to read and write, and some are taught by their masters. White men back then when they wrote they would maybe change things to make them seems less of bad people. This book puts everything about slavery from a different perspective. But one thing that is troubling is how accurate is the book? Its been said by Jacob that she learned her abc's, but is it enough to write an entire book. I believe she was able to write the book but her editor made changes to the writing so that everyone can understand. Because if you would read a dialogue from the book the writing isn't the same as the rest of the book. Could there be a possibility that the editor would have not written the book exactly how she wanted, did he change a few things? It is a good book if want to see through the perspective of a slave. But is best to keep in mind that the book did come from her but there could be a few things the editor possibly changed because how she wrote was hard to understand.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

White and Slave Gender Roles. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Color Purple Gender Roles

The Color Purple follows the traumatic life experience of Celie, the main character in the movie, a young African-American woman. She was raised in the rural parts in Georgia and grew up thinking that someone had to have power over her because of the position of her father. Her father was a man that thought that women had to do whatever ever to please him and satisfy all of his needs. This left no exception to his daughter, Celie, who was repeatedly raped by her father, and ends up giving birth to two kids at a very young age because of it. Her father takes the kids away because he doesn't want anyone to know what was going on and because if someone knew his daughter had been pregnant, he wouldn't be able to marry her off. Celie has a sister named Nettie who the father seems to protect and care for more because when a man comes to marry her, the father urges him to take Celie instead. This situation was no better for Celie because if it wasn't the same it was worse than her being abused by her father. exploitation.

Celie writes letter to God and explains to him all the details of her life because she feels like nobody else is listening. Her father always told her to tell nobody but God and that stuck with her through all of her tragedies and triumphs because she was able to get through it that way. But throughout the movie Celie meets women who all have very different personalities and ways that they deal with the men in their life. By building these relationships with other black women, Celie gets strength and is able to develop insight from all of their point of views. In the end she gets to develop a sense of her own right knowing who she is and what it means to be a woman. She is able to grow her own values and understand what her experiences have done for her and how they shaped who she was able to be. It allowed her to see that she was independent and didn't need a man to take care of her or provide for her.

In the film, the gender roles are shown very clearly. The males in this film are shown as having the most power and being the leader of the household and controlling everything. They don't do work, are very dominant and show no affection of care. They have the most control over the women in the film because they show them as bowing down to the men as a sign of respect. The women in the film are seen as obedient and submissive and someone without a voice. We see this with Celie because she is given away as a piece of property to her husband Albert, who is referred to as Mr., without any consent or choice in the matter. She becomes a slave to her husband and has to stay in line with his views or else she would be severely beaten and punished. Celie has lost all of her freedom through this and we see this because when Mr. wants to have sex, even if Celie does not, she is forced to do so. Celie is talked down to and seen as small by all the men in her life. She is supposed to do everything from the cooking, cleaning, tending to children, working in the fields, and is still seen as less to a man.

There are other characters in this movie that challenge their gender roles. The first one that we notice is between Harpo and Sofia's relationship. We get to see a big difference in this relationship the what we see in Celie and Albert. Sophia is not the norm when it comes to marrying Harpo and he begins to clearly see this after they are married. She shows that women can be powerful and dominant in a relationship and that there should be a balance. Sophia is not one that can be bossed around and states how she will always make her own decisions. She will not be the wife that listens and does whatever Harpo has to say. She wanted to feel respected by her husband and she wants Harpo to talk and share ideas with her. Sophia and Harpo get into a fight and Sophia actually wins the fight. This is different because he is he man, and his wife is fighting him back and now he feels like less of a man and we can see that Sophia is very clear that she won't back down to bow down. In the end, Harpo is the one that changes and is he is doing all of the things which are normally left for the woman to do and he is accepting of this. He came around and understood that it was okay to not have that dominant power but to be equals and that he doesn't need to conform to the general standards of their society.

Because of the disruption of traditional gender roles in the film The Color Purple, we see a lot of growth in the women that are presented throughout the movie. We get an understanding on how they are being oppressed and how they can overcome it. It shows a lot of female solidarity because a lot of the women lean on each other in the movie for advice and companionship and through their experiences they are able to grow and unify as women. These women are looked as lesser than their male counters, but we see just how strong they are. They fight for their freedom and I think that is the best thing about the movie because they do it together with each other's guidance and support. In the end, the movie came full circle with the women being strong and independent. The women were able to celebrate what it meant to be a female. It showed how their experiences developed and guided their emotional strength and how they were able to take control of their life.

The movie challenged the traditional female and male roles and it showed how women can be the provider and men can let their female partner show masculine characteristics and it not be something that isn't accepted by society. This movie showed the parallels between the third wave of feminism. It was able to show how African American women were rooted in their culture, religion, and history. It showed how there was growth in the movement but that there is still working to be done so that women aren't seen as objects that are weak, but very strong. I think The Color Purple showed many different parallels to gender roles that are traditional today and some that aren't. It also suggested many ideas that gave the viewer insight on what it means to be a male and what it means to be a female. It gave clear views on what society views as what is acceptable and is normal, but it also showed what we might need to think twice about and what we should change. As a viewer, I enjoyed this film because it showed no matter what gender you are, you deserve equality.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Color Purple Gender Roles. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Perception of Gender Roles and Victimization in Gone Girl

When I think of my wife, I always think of her head. I picture cracking her lovely skull, unspooling her brains trying to get answers. These are the first words said by Ben Affleck's character, Nick Dunne, regarding his wife Amy Dunne (played by Rosalind Pike) in Gone Girl. Gone Girl was directed by David Fincher and based on the 2012 novel of the same name written by Gillian Flynn. This mystery drama portrays the story of when Nick's wife Amy is presumably kidnapped the morning of their 5 year anniversary and the resulting backlash. Her kidnapping is only the beginning of a complex and premeditated plan created by Amy to frame Nick for her murder. As the movie progresses, the resulting police and media involvement reveal the true nature of their marriage and leaves the audience questioning Nick and Amy's moral and mental capabilities. Gone Girl uses non traditional narration, lighting, and camera angles to create a world in which the perception of masculinity and femininity are called into question to present the complexity between victimization and marriage.

The narrative story in Gone Girl tells the story of Nick and Amy's marriage from both point-of-views and the events in their relationship that led them to their current state of resentment and distrust. The film begins from Nick's perspective but continuously shifts to Amy's first person narrative story. This continuous shift in the story keeps the audience guessing as to the reliability of each character and makes it difficult to sympathize with one over the other since both clearly have moral and/or mental shortcomings. It is up to the reader to distinguish the lies that Nick and Amy tell about their relationship from the truth and that presents the question of who the real victim is within their union. The fact that Dunne describes how he pictures cracking her lovely skull and unspooling her brain immediately paints an image of violence and deception, which also happens to be two of the main themes Fincher operates with in the film. This theme of deception is exaggerated through Dunne's need to get answers. It seems as though primal questions about his wife dominate his mind: What are you thinking? How are you feeling? This suggests that the marriage between the two is far from stable, and foreshadows the conflict that will take place within the film. This idea of conflict is reinforced through the question; What have we done to each other? Again, it is immediately clear to the audience that this marriage is anything but healthy. The character's narration here also disturbs the audience, as Dunne passes off cracking her lovely skull to get answers as the primal desires of any marriage. Furthermore, the narration by Dunne has a slight echoing and effect on it, as well as the sound feeling very close, as though Affleck has purposefully gotten very close to the mic when recording these lines. This gives a sense of intimacy to his words, which then make what he is saying that much more unnerving and unsettling. As the narrative point of view shifts between Nick's first-person narration and Amy's first-person diary, it is up to the reader to distinguish the lies that Nick and Amy tell about their relationship from the truth and presenting the question of who the real victim is within their union. The non traditional narration in this film manages to capture Nick and Amy's relationship from both points of views in order to question traditional marriage roles and present a dynamic view to victimization within marriage.

Lighting in this film plays a monumental role in highlighting the drama and tension between Nick and Amy through the film. The film starts just before dawn and the emphasis of the mid and dark tones, especially with the blues, gives the whole sequence a very moody, atmospheric feel. Because of the time of day of the sequence, the lighting is very low- key, which sets the film up to be dark in tone. This particular use of lighting could be considered a metaphor for the characters' thoughts and feelings; presently their lives are dull and boring, yet an event is about to occur that will 'awaken' them, so to speak, just like dawn would literally do that. The shadowy nature of the shots used in the scene creates intrigue “ it shrouds aspects of the town in mystery, and makes the audience want to find out more about the people that live there without giving important plot points away. Nick's face is mostly in the shadows when Amy first because Nick himself is a mystery. The only thing the audience knows about Nick is his dishonest and unhappy marriage. That changes for Nick because as the audience learns more about his relationship and starts to sympathize with his character his face is portrayed more in direct light and less in the shadows that were obscuring his face. Amy, on the other hand, is portrayed differently from the beginning; her face is lit and she is portrayed front and center. A perfect example is the very beginning when Nick is stroking Amy's hair and she is looking straight into the camera; nothing is hidden or obscure. However, as the movie progresses and more is learned about her deception she is portrayed in less flattering lighting. The best example being the scene where she finally returns home in her bloody nightdress and runs up to Nick to hug him and is consequently presented in very harsh sunlight and the with deep black shadows in the background.

A variety of camera angles were used in this film to further illustrate the perception of Amy and Nick's jaundiced view of marriage and resulting backlash. At the beginning of the film a series of shots lasting a few seconds each show the setting where the movie will take place.

There is rarely any movement, and definitely no lavish scenes to break up the shots of the town. Only the few of the shots are close-ups, with most being long- shots that have a wide field of view. This makes the subjects and buildings the camera focuses on seem empty and abandoned. It is also important to note that the title card begins to fade out quickly after the shot fades in. This may relate to the theme of deception and disappearance, as the title is pretty much 'Gone' before the audience can even see it. The shot itself is a wide angle long-shot of a boat moving down the Mississippi river, which denotes a very solitary and lonely feel, especially when combined with the washed-out colours. Overall, the establishing sequence of the town serves to not only show the audience settings and locations that will later become important to the film, but also serve as a symbol for the lonely and empty feel to the scene as a whole. Although most of the focus of the title sequence is on the establishing location-based shots, the two main protagonists, Amy and Nick, are also shown. The audience knows they are of significance to the rest of the story because they are the first characters shown in the film. In the first shot, Amy's character is shown in a close up. The camera angle is extremely close and centered on her so she is the sole thing the audience can focus on, emphasizing her importance to the story. At the end of the sequence, Ben Affleck's character is shown outside what is presumed to be is house, from a further distance than Amy's character was framed. He is wearing lightly coloured clothes to give the idea of innocence and naivety of his character. Just like the female protagonist, he is dressed very lazily. His posture also shows how tired he feels.

Fincher's Gone Girl successfully used cinematographic techniques such as narrative story, lighting, and camera angles to convey the story about a dysfunctional heterosexual marriage and using social satire to explore the ways in which, under the right circumstances, the institution of marriage can reduce a previously healthy relationship into struggle for autonomy and control, a game where each spouse competes to be the most valued or desired member of a marriage. The profound effect this film had on me since I first saw it when it came out in theaters has to do with the extreme circumstances that the female protagonist goes to prove a point about her marriage. Although exaggerated circumstances are presented in this movie I do understand what the director is trying to convey. Marriage is a complicated journey and, like with Amy and Nick, there is no guarantee that the person you marry will be the same person 5 years later. In their case economic and family crisis served as the perfect storm for the dissolution of their marriage which is also the case in many modern real life marriages. Although there have been many movies over the years depicting the same theme I believe that Gone Girl, although through exaggerated circumstances, was able to capture the complex relationship between victimization and marriage.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Perception of Gender Roles and Victimization in Gone Girl. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gender Roles and Psychology in Human Behaviors

Women are constantly oppressed in society with their wages, representations and roles in life. When working, women are sometimes harassed and normally receive half the pay of a men's salary and have to work twice as hard to be equivalent to a man. They are patronized in the work place and oversexualized when it comes to television and film. A women is given the role of being a mother, chef, caregiver and a cleaner, but yet they receive no respect. With these expectations, women are forced to live up to the standards that society gives to them. Not willingly, but because they have no choice.

Instead of being the stay home parent who looks after the kids, cooks and cleans, men are viewed as the breadwinners. They wake up early in the morning, get straight to work, and make sure their family is taken care of. With men living up to these standards they are also recognized more than women. Why is that? According to the male society, women aren't supposed to have a say. Anything they have an idea about is supposed to stay inside their household and reported to their husband. As Rebecca Solnit said in the story Men Explained Things to Me from the Writer's Presence, Billions of women must be out there on this seven-billion-person planet being told that they are not reliable witnesses to their own lives, that the truth is not their property, now or ever (Solnit, Rebecca). This gives a clear explanation as to why a women should not be acknowledged when they speak, especially not even being able to be witnesses to their own lives. Their point will never be proven nor matter, when it comes to society looking in on one's life. This is such a frightening way to look at life and women. A female should have the same rights a man does. If the truth is not a females property, then the same exact truth is not a males property.

In most countries around the world, women have much less earning power in the labor market than men. The median annual earnings for all U.S men working full-time, year-round, is $50,033 while the annual earning figures for women is $39,197. In this obvious case, women are making about eleven thousand dollars less than a man working in the same field as they are. Thus, even among the fully employed, a woman still earns only about 79 cents for every dollar a man earns (Newman, David M.). With this being the reality of what's happening now, it is clear that women are constantly degraded by this behavior. It's even been estimated that out of every three American women lives on the verge of poverty. In 2010, for the first time in our history, women outnumbered men in the paid labor force-though this shift had as much to do with larger numbers of men losing their jobs than with larger numbers of women entering the labor force (cited in Rampell, 2010) (Newman, David M.). The only reason women were able to gain such opportunity was because men lost theirs. They lost their opportunity of working in such work force which then gave women the chance to gain the positions men once had. Even though this ironic change occured, it only lasted for the year 2010. When talking about the work area and looking at the side of wages and salary, life for women and men were very unequal.

Women with bachelor's degree can expect to earn less than men with a two-year associate's degree. Similarly, women with doctoral degrees earn much less than men with only master's degrees (ProQuest Statistical Abstract, 2015) (Newman, David M.). There are four major categories of degrees that are available after graduating high school which are, associates, bachelor's , master's, and doctoral degrees. A person can receive one of the four degrees depending on their level of study. Seeing that a man can be at level two and still exceed a women at level five is a huge problem. How can you pass someone who is higher than you or knows more than you? A women only made it to that level because she received all the proper practice and help that came with each level. She worked very hard and fought to get to that stage in life. With a man being at level two, that means his journey has just begun. He isn't far ahead or on a higher level because he doesn't know of the obstacles or sacrifices those levels will come with. With a man being able to exceed a woman who is three levels higher than him is outrageous and unexplainable. This precisely shows that no matter how ahead in life a woman is, a man can make her title worth less.

In life, society highlights men to be superior human figures, which impacts the way a young boy is brought up. Instead of them living their life and enjoying the simple things, they will already be pushed to the point of maturity. As Silas Hansen said in the story, What Real Men Do from The Writer's Presence, He has heard people say this his whole life, even when he was a kid, even back when he was still trying, desperately trying, to be as happy as a girl -- and later, too, after he told people the truth of his gender (Just trying to help, they would say) -- so he knows it must be true: He shouldn't be afraid of anything. In this quote, Hansen happens to be speaking about himself, and explaining what he has heard and been told while growing up. Hansen also says, A real man watches football, knows how to do things around the house, and doesn't watch TV shows or movies. (Hansen, Silas) Why is it that a man has to have these traits? Because society place these values on men, they now feel obligated to fulfill the requirements or they won't fit into a man's category.

In some situations at a regular workplace, women tend to be very defensive. They feel the need to be this way because they need to protect themselves. Because some women were so vulnerable, men tend to take advantage of them and tyrannize them. Women believed that one of the ways to keep men from bullying them and getting their way was to become defensive. Women had their guards up at all times just in case something out of the ordinary happened. Once a women got a job, she was very protective of it and made sure she did whatever she could have done to keep it. Men were so much empowered that if they wanted a women's job, they could take it away in the matter of seconds. Limit educational and training opportunities for women and withhold adequate jobs with the excuse that women are incapable of filling them (Pharr, Suzanne). Women have been openly limited to receiving jobs and education all around the world, so I believe that they had and still have a right to be defensive over what's theirs.

World War II was a huge war that lasted from 1939 to 1945. Before World War II began, women still acted on their role which was to be the stay home parent, while the men were out working. During World War II, all men went away to go to war leaving most of the womens in their jobs. For womens, this was an honor but nevertheless, their pay would still remain less than what a man would be making in that job. How could a women feel good about herself knowing that this was the only option of living? She didn't. Why are females treated the way they are? How is this fair to the female society around the world? Most females are handled this way because they aren't respected by other human beings around the world. The kind of negativity that most females go through on the regular basis is unacceptable and threatening.

Women have struggled to break through into male-dominated careers for decades due to stereotypes fostered by the media's influence. As much as it was a fight for them back then, the same fight is going on now. There has been a plethora of times where a woman has been denied a job because she doesn't look strong or sturdy enough to lift the weights. In other words, females are basically being told, go find something else to do, this is a man's job. Looking into the life of politics, there are mostly men that take on the roles in government. Why not a women? During the Presidential election of 2016, Donald Trump took the victory over Hillary Clinton in becoming the president. Even though Hillary Clinton didn't win the election, she has done a great deed. She paved the pathway for women all over to have the courage to run for a place in the office. She stands on the sturdy shoulders of many more female political pioneers who also aspired to be the leader of the free world, but they were just a little before their time, says Maria L La Ganga from The Guardian magazine. Analyzing this quote, we can see that women didn't have the right to try and run for anything when it came to the political aspect of things. Being that Hillary joined the election in running for president in the year 2016, she showed women that there's nothing wrong with trying. If I can do it, you can do it as well.

According to The New York Times, Shannon Sims writes, Some fishermen and women on Lake Kivu cast their nets at sunset and return before dawn to collect their trappings. But that method can be risky: the nets can be tampered with, or the catch scooped up by interlopers in the midnight hours while everyone else is asleep. So instead, many of the fisherwomen choose to spend their nights on the water. But nights on the lake can be uncomfortable and even dangerous, for any number of reasons ” wind and pirates, among others. Last year, as a single mother, Ms. Karikumutima had no choice but to bring her infant baby out on the wooden boat with her at night, lying the baby down on a blanket in the hull of the canoe while she paddled from one net to another in the cold and the rain. The intense physical work and danger that comes with fishing on Lake Kivu, along with reinforcement from traditional gender roles, kept women from fishing for generations, tending to backyard farms instead. But in post-genocide Rwanda, that seems to be changing. For Ms. Karikumutima to take such a brave step forward to provide for her family shows a sign of courage and determination. Her courageous act shows women that they can't do absolutely whatever they need to do to survive in this lifetime. Meanwhile other fishermen and women are only casting their nets at sunset and returning before dawn to collect their trappings, Karikumutima is taking her baby out onto the wooden boat and into the water, on a journey with her to collect her feeding for a period of time. Along with reinforcement from traditional gender roles, kept women from fishing for generations, makes it very clear to us that women were not supposed to do anything out of the ordinary, that didn't fit the character of their assigned gender role.

When we take a look at TV shows, movies and commercials, they are supposed to be entertaining elements for the eyes to watch. Taking part in watching these things is a time of relaxation, and sometimes to recover from all the hard work you've done for the day. Television depicts men and women in many contents. Women are portrayed as significantly younger and thinner than women in the population as a whole, and most are depicted as passive, dependent on men, and enmeshed in relationships or housework. Along with that, they are individuals who do not like wearing clothes, freaky, overly submissive to the voices of men, and a wench. The media makes women out to be evil and stuck up, which is why they are not respected in today's society and looked down on.

A mother is the female parent of a child. Mothers are women who inhabit or perform the role of bearing some relation to their children, who may or may not be their biological offspring. Mother's are considered the caregivers, chefs, cleaners, and a woman with strength and courage to face another day. Having a child and taking care of one isn't easy at all. In the first stages of having a child, you have to make sure they are always fed, they are always clean, they have enough clothes to wear, and they are never out of diapers. You get less sleep and all your time goes to taking care of that child. With a woman having this difficult role to take up, they deserve the most respect in the world, but unfortunately they don't receive that respect at all. As a parent, women sometimes receive no respect from the children's. Their kids feel the need to disrespect them because of how they see women are oppressed on TV or in reality.

In the TV show Supernanny, the show features professional nanny Jo Frost, who in each episode helps a family where the parents are struggling with their child. Taking a look into season 4 episode 17, there is a young 8 year old girl named Caila who abuses her mom, while walking home from school. She throws her backpack at her mom, and forces her to carry it. Caila then begins hitting her mom for not taking the backpack, and intensively starts shouting and crying on the sidewalk. With Caila doing all of these unnecessary acts, her 11 year old brother Brandon is no better than she is. Brandon bullies his mom, and yells at her when she punishes him and takes away his TV. He screams how much he hates her, and wishes she was never in his life. This is a perfect example that shows how women are mistreated by their children and left to feel ashamed of themselves. When picturing the image of your child yelling at you and saying hurtful things, you would be left in a puzzled state of mind.

With the type of living that occurred in the 1800's and even before that time, it corrupted the minds and thoughts of many people. Society is changing everyday but the negativity still seems to find its way out in the world. Negativity on women of course. Women deserve better in every aspect of life. There is no reason why a women should have to walk the streets of her neighborhood with her head down. A women needs all the empowerment in this world and Maya Angelou's speech Phenomenal Woman is the definite face of encouragement.

Pretty women wonder where my secret lies. I'm not cute or built to suit a fashion model's size. But when I start to tell them, they think I'm telling lies. I say, it's in the reach of my arms, the span of my hips, the stride of my step, the curl of my lips. I'm a woman, phenomenally, phenomenal woman. That's me, I walk into a room, just as cool as you please, and to a man, the fellows stand or, fall down on their knees. Then they swarm around me, a hive of honey bees. I say, it's the fire in my eyes, and the flash of my teeth. The swing in my waist, and the joy in my feet. I'm a woman, phenomenally, phenomenal woman. That's me. Men themselves have wondered, what they see in me, they try so much, but they can't touch my inner mystery. When I try to show them, they say they still can't see. I say, it's in the arch of my back, the sun of my smile, the ride of my breasts, the grace of my style. I'm a woman, phenomenally, phenomenal woman. That's me. Now you understand, just why my head's not bowed. I don't shout or jump about, or have to talk real loud. When you see me passing, it ought to make you proud. I say, it's in the click of my heels, the bend of my hair, the palm of my hand, the need for my care. 'Cause I'm a woman, phenomenally, phenomenal woman. That's me (Angelou, Maya).

Maya Angelou's speech Phenomenal Woman is a speech that is fighting against society and its stereotypical ways in identifying how a woman should act or carry themselves. She gives woman a new definition of feminine and shows that idea of being a woman and feminine are very subjective. She proves in her speech that her confidence and determination attracts the eyes of men, not her body or sexual submissive comments. Through her speech, she gives woman the encouragement they need to face another day in the type of society they are living in. Angelou makes it very clear that one person does not need to fit a certain role to be considered strong or beautiful. With all facts that have been stated, it is very clear that women once again are constantly oppressed in society with their wages, representations and roles in life and there needs to be a change or together as a community, everyone will all fall.

Work Cited

Angelou, Maya. Phenomenal Woman by Maya Angelou. Poetry Foundation, Poetry Foundation, www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/48985/phenomenal-woman.

Frost, J. (2005). Season 4 Episode 17. Supernanny. American Broadcasting Company, Channel 4, W Network, E4, Esquire Network.

Hansen, Silas. What Real Men Do. The Writer's Presence: a Pool of Readings, by Donald McQuade and Robert Atwan, Bedford/St. Martin's, 2018, pp. 111“115.

Newman, David M. Identities and Inequalities: Exploring the Intersections of Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality. THIRD ed., McGraw-Hill Education, 2017.

Pharr, Suzanne. Homophoba as a Weapon of Sexism . Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: an Integrated Study, by Paula S. Rothenberg and Soniya Munshi, Worth Publishers/Macmillan Learning, 2016, pp. 134“143.

Sims, Shannon, et al. Rwandan Women Paddle Into the Male World of Fishing. The New York Times, The New York Times, 1 Dec. 2018.

www.nytimes.com/2018/11/30/world/rwandan-women-paddle-into-the-male-world-of-fishing.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FWomen%27s%2BRights&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics?®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection.

Solnit, Rebeca. Men Explain Things To Me. The Writer's Presence: a Pool of Readings, by Donald McQuade and Robert Atwan, Bedford/St. Martin's, 2018, pp. 492“497.

Wood, Julia T. Gendered Media: The Influence of Media on Views of Gender. 1994, www.nyu.edu/classes/jackson/causes.of.gender.inequality/Readings/Wood%20-%20Gendered%20Media%20-%2094.pdf.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gender Roles and Psychology in Human Behaviors. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Oppression and Gender Roles in Pre-War African American Society

African American history leading up to the Civil War, and beyond, is most commonly identified by its reaction to oppression from the nation's white majority. This relationship caused gender roles in African American society to be formed in a similarly reactionary way; the way African American men and women acted in every part of society was a direct response to the way they were treated in society. Therefore, white oppression of both enslaved and free African Americans formed the gender roles in African American society because racism set free African American women apart from the women's rights movement, gender identities in enslaved societies were intentionally confused by the masters for both African American men and women, and white perceptions of African American men and women became intentionally offensive in order to justify further oppression.

During the pre-war period, many abolitionist groups were beginning with the purpose of opposing slavery; many were formed by white women, but African American women were excluded from those groups. The most popular example of female abolitionists during this time tends to be the famed Grimke sisters, seen as pioneers of abolition and often credited as the first American women to lecture in public; though this is not true, as Maria Stewart, a free African American woman who wrote for the Liberator, lectured before them, in fact, according to Jone John Lewis, we know of no other American-born [female] public lecturer before Maria Stewart. Maria Stewart's existence and persistence as a lecturer proves that African American women were a part of the liberation movement, and the credit given to white women indicates that African American women aren't commonly acknowledged as having a role in abolition. This assertion is also supported by the works of Sojourner Truth, such as in her speech Ain't I a Woman? which pointed out the disparity between white and African American women in terms of treatment and acceptance, and proclaimed If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again! Such biblical arguments were common for the time, and became the basis for moral arguments against racism. This position in society in which African American women found themselves was very different from their position in the family unit; in free African American society, men and women were equal in the household, meaning marriage was much more of a partnership than in white society.

This relationship stemmed from both African American men and women facing injustice and oppression, and with both the husband and the wife needing to work to provide for their family it made sense for such a partnership to exist, which contrasted with many white families where women either couldn't or didn't need to work. A good example of the equality found in this relationship would be from Elizabeth Keckley's account on her life; her husband became a burden on her and she informed him that since he persisted in dissipation [they needed to] separate. Her initiative in being able to leave her husband was uncommon for women at the time, and indicates that free African American women had a lot of power in their marriages. This equality in responsibility is echoed by Frederick Douglass, who once stated I belong to the women, in reference to how much female thinkers guided him, and saw themselves as engaged in the same questions as him. Equality in the home between free African American men and women was a response to white oppression, as was African American activism being inclusive of men and women. Going back to Lewis, Maria Stewart became connected with the work of abolitionist publisher William Lloyd Garrison when he advertised for writings by black women, which indicates that the principle abolitionist movement gave more of a voice to free black women. The role of African American women in free society was created as a response to oppression from the white majority, and it tended to be one of similar stature to free African American men.

The dynamic in enslaved society was not as promising a picture as that of free African American society; sexual abuse was rampant, and little power was in the hands of the enslaved. The dynamic between the slavers and the enslaved is best illustrated in Solomon Northup's Twelve Years a Slave, with the dynamic between the slave girl Patsy, the master of the plantation Edwin Epps, and the Epps's wife; Northup explained that her abuse was because it had fallen to her to be the slave of a licentious master and a jealous mistress. Epps was sexually abusive of Patsy, Mrs. Epps was angry at her husband who raped and abused one of his slaves so she took out her anger on the slave who had no choice but to take abuse from both; this was a very common dynamic in the plantation South. Stephanie Camp, in her book Closer to Freedom, quotes the Reverend Ishrael Massie from an in interview out of the 1930s, who, talking about the high frequency of white abusers of slave women, said, I call em suckers- feel like saying something else but I'll spec ya, honey. Lord, chile, day wuz common.

There were two reasons behind this abuse; the first, and most obvious, was the more lustful reason, and the second was to mentally break a slave by taking the right to their body away from them. Camp explains the root of taking away slaves' ownership of themselves by how [planters] often referred to them by their parts: hands was a common term, and heads was not unfamiliar, and by identifying them as one with their farm tools and called, simply, hoes. Calling enslaved women by the names of their body parts and tools weakened the differentiation between them and the tools with which they worked, and furthered enslaved women from their captors. But this use of enslaved women as sex objects went far beyond the rape of workers, it extended into the domestic slave trade, and became nothing better than a means of sex trafficking. Edward E. Baptist, in his essay 'Cuffy,' 'Fancy Maids,' and 'One-Eyed Men': Rape, Commodification, and the Domestic Slave Trade in the United States, described a correspondence between two slave traders in Louisiana who operated a slave trading business, in this correspondence they mention a fancy maid, which refers to an enslaved woman traded to be used for a master's sexual pleasures, the business was a slave-trading partnership, and systematic rape and sexual abuse of slave women were part of the normal practice of the men who ran the firm.

The sale of enslaved women as sex objects along with enslaved women being called by the names of their body parts or tools are proof that slave owners viewed slaves entirely as objects, with little regard for their humanity. But enslaved women had strategies to fight back against these practices, and one that directly contradicted the tool label was the use of secret, slave-organized parties. At these parties, enslaved women would dance in an act of self-liberation, in fact, [consistent] with African kinesic morality, slave dancers commonly rejected embracing as immodest and even indecent. This way of freely practicing sexuality without being forced to by masters was a way of regaining control over one's body, and it allowed enslaved women to rediscover their humanity in the face of being called tools. Enslaved men faced similar hardships on the plantation, though the rape of enslaved men was far less common than the rape of enslaved women, enslaved men would often be forced to rape black women at gunpoint, this served the dual purposes of natural reproduction and emasculating enslaved men. Enslaved men were also emasculated through their clothes; slave children were only given one yard of rough spun fabric, or just enough to make a small shift or gown for an average-sized child.

Enslaved boys didn't get to wear pants of any kind, in fact enslaved children, both male and female, wore simple gowns throughout much of childhood. Boys wore these garments until they were old enough to be ""breeched,"" or given their first pair of breeches, or short pants, usually between the ages of five and ten. This was a way of confusing growing boys about their gender from a young age, being forced to wear the same clothes as growing girls meant that enslaved boys wouldn't as easily be able to form their own gender identity as easily, which was another form of emasculating young enslaved men. Enslaved men would be frustrated by their position and their emasculation, which often meant that [some] enslaved men were not above exploiting the positions of relative power that they sometimes enjoyed, and enslaved men who acted as overseers were known to abuse enslaved women likely to relieve some of that frustration. This tenuous relationship between enslaved men and women would be tested in marriage, where enslaved women often played central roles in the black family. The disproportionate sale of men into the slave trade resulted in many female-headed families throughout the antebellum South, which is how white oppression made the enslaved the head of the family. Enslaved families couldn't count on having a father that would remain with them because of the high likelihood of separation, which is why the slave family as an institution adapted to, even as it was ravaged by, personal loss. With as much sexual abuse as female slaves were known to face, it was a matter of necessity to survive by any means possible for one's own family; this is what built the black woman in enslaved society, survival for family.

With all these atrocities committed, the question must be asked; how could a people commit such horrific acts and justify them? Many practices were justified through stereotypes that, at times, made African Americans out to be sub-human, and, at their worst, made African Americans out to be dangerous and malicious. These stereotypes started early with the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade; views on African women were used to justify their harsh treatment and rape using representations of African bodies as inherently laboring ones lacking any hint of sexuality. This became a justification for the forced labor of Africans, as, to Europeans, Africans were fit “ naturally fit “ for demanding agricultural and reproductive labor on the plantations in the Americas. These stereotypes would manifest into caricatures around the antebellum period; many would be created and associated with the Jim Crow caricature, the first blackface character created by one Thomas Dartmouth Daddy Rice. Rice took a song from a black person who happened to be singing about Jim Crow, and in 1828 Rice appeared on stage as ""Jim Crow"" -- an exaggerated, highly stereotypical black character. Jim Crow portrayed African Americans as lazy, dumb, and subservient, which became another justification for slavery and later Jim Crow laws, other caricatures would follow.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Oppression and Gender Roles in Pre-War African American Society. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Portrayal of Gender Roles in Advertisement: Effects on Women’s Self-Esteem

In today's society appearance is everything. Looking the part and playing the role can allow one to go a long way in media, but particularly advertisement. Honestly, who has not mumbled or thought to themselves while watching an advertisement, I wish I looked like that? A commercial for intimate wear or a trendy cosmetic line can have women looking in the mirror critiquing their physical appearance while reviewing their flaws. Mass media and advertisement can form insecurities within women which play on their self-esteem. It's important to examine the negative stereotypes in media and advertisement which cause reporting of low self-esteem.

Advertisement impacts its viewers, so that is why it's important to understand the impact on how it shapes the perception of the viewer. Self-esteem and advertisement are not often correlated with one another, but it's evident that women are affected mentally and physically which can have effects on their self-esteem. Advertisement focuses on gender roles and how women are positively and negatively portrayed. This study will focus on the effect gender roles on the self-esteem of women and how they can be view differently. Society plays a role in creating low self-esteem in women from a young age due to the many unrealistic expectations that women try to live up to. It's crucial to see the positive, so one doesn't get lost in expectations that society and media has placed on them.

Literature Review

It is known that people turn to forms of mass media for information when they lack the knowledge and experience with subjects or situations (Lee, 2009). Cultivation Theory suggests that people mostly rely on television messages for a worldview, which causes unambiguous views on social reality. Cultivations theory is a form of communication that claims repeated exposure to images in mass media could affect the viewer's perception of reality (Riddle, 2009). Social norms and perception of reality are created by the worldly views. Lee (2009) claims that behaviors are replicated when the subject is physically attractive, which grants for a pleasing outcome. Johnson and Holmes (2009) stated that those who seek and follow an unrealistic perception of reality, when the outcome doesn't replicate to the desired fantasy, they will be disappointed. This can be problematic granted the outcome doesn't turn out in their favor. Perception can allow one to believe that what they see is right or correct. An example would be a viewer watching unhealthy eating being displayed by a model who has the idea or perfect figure, they view will hold the same expectations for themselves not realizing that an unrealistic perception has been shown to them. Adults, both younger and older who set their goals on idealized images, which they desire to look like, will repeated have their expectations violated. This leads to low self-esteem and low self-satisfaction (Johnson & Holmes, 2009). These images will be used in media through advertisement, with hope to capture the viewer's attention.

Media can have a major impact on its viewers. Commercial advertisement significantly impacts its viewers because fictional perceptions of reality are considered the social norm and valid. Riddle (2009) stated that those who are consistently exposed to commercial advertisement, these individuals have an altered knowledge and worldview of everyday life. The more the mass media messages are exposed, the more likely the viewer will accept the content. Viewers are less likely to differentiate fiction from reality once they have been exposed to high consumptions of these forms of messages (Riddle, 2009). This can be controversial because women who view advertisements may receive the wrong idea, as most advertisement involving women suggest that females should look like models, be trendy and stylish, while concealing their physical flaws. Advertisement messages affect all who view them whether they know it or not. These messages shouldn't be adapted as the social norm or part of one everyday reality. It is important to create self-expectations during adolescences, as taking on the wrong views can impact one long-term (Riddle, 2009).

Gender Roles

Advertisements can be persuasive to the consumer as it suggests the viewer has a need for the item, which motivates the purchase. Women are known to focus on their beauty, which explains why most female target advertisements are focused on products to achieve or enhance one's beauty to receive the look of perfections (McKinley, 2005). Advertisements used female to sell products, this can determine the idea that they are often objectified (Skorek & Schreier, 2009). Advertisements are used to sell a lifestyle; the product must be viewed as a necessity for ones life. Happiness and values play a role into the products that are on display to be sold (Skorek & Schreier, 2009). Women and men are portrayed differently in media. Generalized stereotypes are used to represent women, which gives off the impression that they are subordinate to men. Skorek and Schreier (2009) reported that ten percent of women portrayed working professional roles, such as waitress, secretary, or assistant. Females were viewed as subordinate figures in these advertisements. It was thought that women and presented that women are unable of completing work related task without the help from a male or a machine to assist them. Eisend (2010) boosted the idea that business was an industry for men. In many advertisements, men are seen in positions such the manager or pilot, while women are seen in positions as their secretary or flight attendant, which promotes gender biases and stereotypes.

Media portrays women using many different forms of stereotypes. These stereotypes can be viewed negatively as women have evolved into dominating forces within society. Opportunities are not only presented for men, as women have suited up to take on many roles and challenges over the years. Negative stereotypes of women shown in media, just to name a few; women's place is home and in the kitchen (Skorek & Schreier, 2009). These forms of advertise once gave off the impression that women don't deal with the decision makings of the home. The task of the homemaker wasn't viewed as an important job. The perception has always been that women need men for support, protection. It's true that once women dependent of men and were only seen as sexual objects. Women appear in sexually suggestive content more then men (Lundstrom & Sciglimpaglia, 1977). It's seldom for women to be shown as participants in competitive sports or competitions of any sort. They are viewed as an object that men come home to after a long day of work; they are viewed as just the housewife. Researchers have found claims to support that fact that women portrayed in media are always subjected to the same stereotypical roles. Women are not commonly shown in working roles, as business members, or having power and authority over men (Skorek & Schreier, 2009). Due to there being many negative stereotypes in media in how women are being presented, it's crucial to take a further look at the perspective from the view point of women. This will give an insight more intently on how women are being objectified in media.

Perspective

Women feminist believe that women's experiences, concerns, and ideas are as valuable as those of men and should be treated with equal seriousness and respect (Kim, 2008, p.392). Frequent grievances towards media and advertisement portrayals of women would be the consistent idea that females don't hold positions of authority, the idea that all workplaces are dominated by men, and sex-role socializations (Stephenson, Stover, Villamor, 1997). Feminist primarily focus on dominance and social order (Kim, 2008) and they argue that women should be treated and granted that same equality in media and advertisement representation as men. The goal is to cease the idea that males are the dominate gender, but aim to have women and men viewed as equals and to eradicate the messages being used to stereotype and generalize women. When media and advertisements can get to a place where they generalize the viewpoints of females less, that is when they will be better represented in a different aspect of social life (Lee, 2009).

Self-Esteem

Research

The gathered information on mass media and how women are portrayed in advertisement the hypothesis suggest:

H: Negative images of females result in high exposure of stereotypes in media advertisement which correlates with low self-esteem among females of all ages.

Methods

Participants

This study mainly involved female interactions with media and advertisement. They used 350 female high school students living on the west coast of the United States. They used participants of different races, which consisted of Caucasians (70%), African Americans (18%), Hispanics (7%), Asian (4%), and other (1%). The students consisted of freshman (12%), sophomores (34%), juniors (25%), and seniors (29%). The students study ages ranged from 14 to 18 with an average age being 15 (60%).

Procedure

Two high schools were sought out to conduct this study. Administrators contacted the school board to receive permission to survey the students during lunch hours and after school. The school allowed for flyers to be sent out to all female students, providing information regarding a survey that they could participate in. Female students needed to submit a verbal interest as well as a parental permission slip, granted them access to participate in the survey. The survey was voluntary and only given to those with consent from a parent or guardian.

The first survey was conducted in a classroom during the lunch period for those who wished to participate at that time. The second survey was conducted after school in the lunch cafeteria. The survey was handed out to each student during both sessions once all participants were checked in. The instructors explained the instruction of the survey prior to being handed out. The students were advised not to share the any information regarding the survey with their peers. One instructor advised the student on how to properly take the survey while the other instructor passed out the survey and pencils to the students. The content for the survey consisted of a fifty question questionnaire which involved effects media has on ones emotions. The students were informed that their survey would be submitted anonymously so names were not needed to be place on the paper, and that they answers were voluntary.

Instrumentation

Demographic Items

The survey included questions on the student's grade, age and race.

Media Exposure

Media exposure was measured by focusing on female stereotypes and depictions in commercial advertisements. A nominal scale which focused on yes or no questions was also used. These nominal questions included: Do you watch commercial advertisements? and Do you observe commercial advertisements directed towards females? The Likert scale questions included: How many times a week do you view commercials advertisements? and How often do you notice the stereotypes in which females are portrayed in commercial advertisements? Responses ranged from (1) never view to (5) always view.

Self-Esteem

The Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) was used to measure self-esteem. The RSE scale contained 5 items; from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a 5-point Likert scale (Rill et al., 2009) Samples questions were added to measure the overall emotional level of esteem. High scores reflected high level of self-esteem, while lower scores reflected lower levels of self esteem. The coefficient was rated .85 in a previous study. Sample questions included, I often feel worthless and I often have low sense of accomplishment.

Data Plan

The Pearson Correlation tested the hypothesis. This test calculated the correlation coefficients of the two variables. Both the independent variable and dependent variable are interval/ratio. The hypothesis suggests that high exposure to negative images of female stereotypes in media and advertisement correlate with low self-esteem.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Portrayal of Gender Roles in Advertisement: Effects on Women's Self-Esteem. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/4/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay
Stop wasting your time searching for samples!
You can find a skilled professional who can write any paper for you.
Get unique paper