Tattooing Services Business

I am going to open up my own business, in which I will be the proud owner of Tattoo's Anonymous. My business will provide tattooing services. My clientele will be above the age of majority (18+). Tattoos Anonymous will operate Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. To start my business, I will be acquiring the necessary funding from a small business loan pending approval. This loan will help me acquire the equipment and supplies I will need to operate within the 1000 square foot space I plan to provide tattooing services. My business will operate as a sole proprietorship, in which I will own and operate with no employees at this time. If successful, I may, in the near future look to add an employee. The property I am hoping to purchase for my business is located at 1010 State St. Erie, PA 16502.

To start a business anywhere, there are a lot of different things involved such as licensing, permits, etc. It is important to conduct thorough research prior to starting a business, as it is not as simple as one may think. One of the first steps I did was to sit down and add up any of the startup costs as recommended by a report put out by the Governor's office (Dced.pa.gov p. 12). This way I could create a plan and have a good idea as to how much money I would need to get started. I then projected my monthly operation costs to gauge how practical this venture would be (Dced.pa.gov p. 13). I strongly believe by doing these two things and doing a ton of research prior to opening up a small business may be the difference maker between success and failure.

Researching where I would like to open my business is where most of my initial time was spent. There are many factors to think about when choosing the location such as parking because some people may hate feeding a meter, or the neighborhood the business is in might have a high crime rate. Therefore, choosing the location might be one of the most important steps in starting your own business. Obviously, there is no way to foresee everything that may become a problem, but doing my due diligence hopefully will pay off in the long run.

The location yet again plays another huge role in operating a business. Each city has different zoning regulations, which dictate what types of business are allowed to operate in certain areas. Once I was satisfied with a location, I then had to make sure it was zoned properly otherwise I would have to start all over. In order to accomplish this, I went to the Erie County Zoning Departments website (erie.pa.us). On the website I was able to view a zoning map for the City of Erie from the year 2017 as well as the contact information if I had any further questions.
After spending several days and hours on searching for the right location I then had another daunting task to handle. I thought for quite some time about my business name because I wanted it to sound professional as well as unique. In Pennsylvania, this step is very important because under the Pennsylvania Fictitious Name Statute you must file your business name with the Department of State (eriebar).

Some may choose not to register their business name with the Department of State, but I did because the penalties can be dire for not doing so. By not registering the business name, some contracts entered may or may not be enforced which could come back to bite me in the rear (Dced.pa.gov p. 20). Skipping this step could save some time and money, but the consequences are not worth it.

Once I filed my business name, I was under the impression I had the sole rights to the name, however I was wrong. To obtain the rights to my business name, I need to file for a trademark. Otherwise I will not have any protection regarding the business name (eriebar). After learning there was yet another step to obtain the rights to my business name I decided not to go ahead with the trademark process. This step won't be necessary for my business since I only intend to operate a small local business. However, if I had plans to branch out and become a bigger business, then I would take the steps to secure a trademark. In order to begin the trademark process, I would have to file an application with the U.S. Patent Office (uspto.gov).

I also learned that if you want to operate a tattoo shop in the city of Erie, you're required to take yet another step to comply with local/city ordinances (eriecountypa.gov). Prior to opening, I had to schedule an inspection by the Health Department to obtain a license to operate a body art establishment. This type of license and inspection pertain strictly to body art shops. The license and inspection need to be renewed yearly to ensure compliance with health standards. The regulations are very specific, and they give detailed instructions on how the business should conduct itself in terms of cleanliness and safety for health reasons. Prior to purchasing a property, I needed to make sure I met the requirements for this health inspection. The main point of this inspection is to ensure there is water, sewer, and a clean work environment.

In order to operate a business, I also had to apply for an Employee Identification Number through the IRS for Tax purposes (eriebar). The EIN can be obtained by a quick application on the IRS website (irs.gov). The EIN I obtained from the IRS will also be used to help me establish my business bank account, which is required by most banks (dced.pa.gov). This step is very important because the legality of my business could have become an issue if I did not follow Federal and State tax regulations.

As a small business owner in Pennsylvania, I am only required to carry Workers Compensation insurance if I have employees. Since I will not be employing anyone at this time I do not need this coverage. In the future if I need this coverage I could get the information by contacting the Bureau of Workers' Compensation (eriebar). They will then send me a form to complete and mail back which would start the process (dced.pa.gov). This type of insurance is only required if you have employees to ensure any work-related accidents will be covered (eriebar).

Thankfully tattoos are not subject to sales tax in the State of Pennsylvania. They are in many others. If tattoos were taxed, I'd collect taxes on all of the sales and then pay them directly to the Department of Revenue. Before I could collect taxes and eventually pay them to the Department of Revenue, I would first have to obtain a Sales and Use Tax License from the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (eriebar). The application is online and can be found directly on the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue's website (pa100.state.pa.us).

To protect my business investment, as well as my own personal finances, I purchased a general liability insurance policy which will cover claims for damages to my business property. (nationwide.com/general). If anything financially were to suddenly change with my business, this insurance will give me some financial protection. While general liability insurance is not required, anything could happen at a moment's notice and I would rather have protection just in case.

As in any business, for it to flourish and succeed, customers are needed to generate business profit. Therefore, it is crucial that potential clientele have a way to get information about my tattooing services establishment as well as contact the business. I will be contacting the phone company to set up a business landline with multiple lines as well as have a presence in social media. Tattoo's Anonymous will have its own Facebook page as well as an Instagram account to promote business and advertise work done for satisfied customers. The store front window will also display a business logo, as well as hours of operation and business phone number to give the shop the professional appearance it needs (pasbdc.org).

As discussed, there are many steps involved when deciding to open a business in Erie, PA. It requires thorough research for a profitable potential business, as well as following city and state requirements to operate a legal business. The steps will vary depending on the business type, but many will remain the same

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Tattooing Services Business. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

An Issue of Medical Tattoos

Abstract

This paper is a comprehensive look on medical tattoos, particularly do not resuscitate order (DNR) and No Cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) tattoos. The main objective of this project was to examine and to dissect cases to discover the ethical or legal issues surrounding tattoos for the basis of medical treatment or lack thereof. The principles of ethics: beneficence, respect, non maleficence, medical equity and the application of principles: informed consent, optimization, medical confidentiality, value of life were used to study the case. In essence, the validity of these tattoos were under review to note whether they were legally binding as DNRs are a critical step between life and death and should not be taken lightly.

Introduction

Tattoos have been present from around 3170 B.C. to depict various meanings. It first began as a representation of tribal markings, religious belief and magical practices. They were also used on young girls to show puberty and then marriage and on boys to show accomplishments and ranks. Around the 1950s, tattoos were worn by the outcasts of society and prisoners and so persons opted not to get tattoos in this time because of the stigma. Then, in the 1970s it was the beginning of its use for adornment and to depict personal stories. These are just a few of the meanings tattoos portrayed over the years.

However, a new purpose has immerged for tattoos, persons are using them for medical alert notifications to healthcare professionals. A wide array of tattoos are seen such as no CPR, DNR order, diabetic, organ donor, allergies and blood types. Medical records and medical alert bracelets carry this information but, they are being tattooed for cases of emergency when a patient doesn’t have a bracelet and is incapacitated or unconscious.

The medical profession is of paramount importance because often time it is a life or death situation therefore there are laws and regulation in place that must be followed to ensure that each setting is of optimum result to protect both patient and physician and to avoid legal battles.

For a DNR order to be signed off the principles of ethics must be considered autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and medical equity. Autonomy is the basis for informed consent and means that the patient has the capacity to understand and communicate effectively and an understanding of the consequences of his or her decisions. Non-maleficence means that patients should not be put in a position where they may experience unnecessary harm. Beneficence means that the care given to patients should benefit the patient. Medical equity means that patients are treated fairly and equally.

The DNR and no CPR is an advanced directive or they are ordered by a physician in the case that resuscitations will not help the underlying condition that is, it cannot be cured or managed. DNR orders are given when a person stops breathing or the heart stops beating or a patient that has a terminal illness and has instructed on record that it is there wish not to be resuscitated. DNR orders can be included in a will because it is a legal document or mentioned in medical records. DNR orders are considered as passive euthanasia and having a tattoo which can be done without regulation, is not a legal document it is merely ink placed on the body whenever and however without regulations.

Key terms

According to the Oxford dictionary
CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
DNR: Do not resuscitate, denoting an instruction not to attempt the resuscitation of a terminally ill patient after a cardiac arrest in hospital.
Tattoos: Mark (a part of the body) with an indelible design by inserting pigment into punctures in the skin.

Discussion

A 70 year old man was brought to the emergency room with a very elevated blood alcohol level. He had a tattoo that read, "Do Not Resuscitate" with “Not” underlined and his signature below the tattoos. However, other than the signature they had no identification for this individual.
He had a pulmonary infection which lead to septic shock which resulted in multiple organ failure (MOF) and a low blood pressure.
He was difficult to revive, so the question was, should they try to resuscitate? Do they have to follow the DNR that was tattooed in large print?

This was a case that presented in Miami, Florida in 2017 at the Jackson Memorial Hospital, the doctors were baffled at this ethical issue not only because the patient’s unconsciousness and DNR tattoo but years before in 2012 there was a similar incident with a 59-year-old man with diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, dyslipidemia and hypertension who had the initials D.N.R on his chest but subsequently he wanted to be resuscitated, he had gotten the tattoo when he lost a poker bet to a fellow colleague while he was drunk.

Dr. Holt a critical care physician, was called in and he made the decision not to honor the tattoo based on the principle of not choosing an irreversible path. The patient was then treated with antibiotics, IV fluids, blood pressure medication and a breathing mask to buy time so they could have an ethics meeting to discuss the patient’s tattoo ethically and legally with an ethics professional. After the consult the ethics review decided to honor the tattoo, he passed away the next morning. His identity and official records of DNR was also discovered by social workers.
But in the case of emergency was it ethical to follow this tattoo? or if there wasn’t an official do not resuscitate order (DNR)? Below are the arguments supporting and opposing medical tattoos as legally binding.

Based on the Florida case and the 2012 case there is significant debate surrounding medical tattoos. Regarding the argument for honoring the tattoo, firstly there are medical alert bracelets and necklaces but they are expensive especially for the persons that are allergic to cheaper materials, they are broken often and professions such as electricians cannot wear jewelry and in the case of emergencies the proper paperwork might not be close to the individual or lost whether it may be in a purse or in a wallet so having a tattoo will be permanent and present with the individual. Also, having a tattoo would not cause emergency physicians great emotional and moral stress resulting from resuscitating a patient to find out after that the patient had a legal DNR document that was not available in the emergency department, in other words, wasting time when this time could be used on other patients. Additionally, some healthcare professionals think that a DNR tattoo expresses an authentic preference because for someone to sit and get a tattoo with do not resuscitate they must have greatly considered the seriousness and consequences of this action.

The defensive against medical tattoos being legally binding is plenty. Firstly it’s argued that medical alert necklaces and bracelets or medical records carry all the relevant information so why are they being tattooed. Tattoos are expensive to be removed therefore it is not easily reversed so if a patient changes his or her mind it cannot be changed or cancelled like with a legal document or medical record that can be deleted or burnt. Also, if the tattoo is simply DNR, there is no way to positively know that it means “do not resuscitate” while it might seem obvious, medical decisions should never be made by guessing alone because the initials could stand for something else. Another issue is having a DNR tattoo is that it lacks specificity. It is an ambiguous term which could mean a patient wants chest compressions, but not a breathing tube, respirator or drugs, a tattoo cannot show this so physicians cannot understand the full meaning. Even DNR tattoos with a signature do not signify that it is a legal contract, this signing has to be witnessed to make it valid and a physician would not know that by just looking at the tattoo. Then there is the fact that anyone can get a tattoo whether they are sane or healthy, young or old, joking or serious, there is no strict regulation and standardization for tattoos based on DNR orders, as seen in the 2012 case where the tattoo was done while the individual was inebriated and had lost a bet. Additionally, it would be difficult to find medical tattoos on a person with multiple other tattoos.

For a DNR to be legally binding the principles of ethics should be followed. The patient should be in full control of his or her choice and understand completely the risk of survival and possible treatment and make the decision that they do not want to be resuscitated, so they have full autonomy and have give informed consent. The usual conditions for DNR orders are when it will not restart the heart or breathing, when there is no benefit or when the DNR order outweighs the burdens. This means the respect and value of life is evaluated also. It cannot be known if all these principles are followed while getting a tattoo as it is not authorized by a doctor.

Another disadvantage is that DNR tattoos and no CPR tattoos may lead to premature death because which cause of death that is not resisted is not on the DNR tattoo. This means if an individual had a car accident and their heart stopped the DNR and no CPR tattoos would cause the patient to die when a simple resuscitating efforts could recover the patient or say a patient was accidentally electric shocked would he or she wants to be revived if they could? Or would they want all forms of life support and medical aid to be provided? These questions are not answered by DNR tattoos. Persons randomly getting a tattoo do not ponder on these other situations that can occur so provisions are not made which inadvertently would lead to premature death and one of the aim of a doctor is to prolong life so it is not ethical to blindly follow a tattoo.

Conclusion

Medical tattoos for example, DNR orders and no CPR are not legally binding, this is because the tattoos do not follow the criteria and ethics principles of autonomy, medical equity, beneficence and non maleficence, therefore if a DNR tattoo is ignored there cannot be any legal ramifications for the medical staff. Honoring these tattoos can cause legal issues because it is a path of irreversibility so to be on the side of caution medical personnel’s should not follow these tattoos when they are encountered. Tattoos on the body can however, be used as a medium to covey the information or message to search for the medical records and follow up on the patient’s wishes but the tattoo cannot be used for the basis of treatment or lack of treatment.

Medical tattoos such as No CPR and DNR, even though there are only a few cases, are becoming more prevalent and the only thing that can be done if medical tattoos are found is to educate emergency personnel and medical staff to search for the tattoos and then gather the relevant information to support the tattoo. The best way as a patient to ensure that the wishes of DNR or no CPR is followed is to have a medical bracelet or necklace or a wallet card that clearly states name, medical preference and any diseases, allergies and blood type. The DNR order should be clear to the type of resuscitation that is prohibited or to the resuscitation that are allowed, in what conditions and it should be approved by a licensed physician who has had a discussion outlining all the consequences and benefits with or without resuscitation.

In the future medical tattoos may be used as a way of treating patients but for this to occur medical tattooing would have to be standardized, meaning they could only be done by medically approved tattoo artists after the DNR or no CPR is approved by a doctor in order to follow the principles of ethics and assigning case number so that there are not forgeries.

Bibliography

  1. Cooper, L. & Aronowitz, P. J GEN INTERN MED (2012) 27: 1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2059-8
  2. Ober, V. and Cambron,C. (2005). Legal Implications and Ethical Considerations of “Do Not Resuscitate”. [Archive] Florida.
  3. www.ems1.com/paramedic-chief/articles/372711048-DNR-tattoos-Are-they-legal-and-is-EMS-bound-to-comply/
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com
  4. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/12/01/a-man-collapsed-with-do-not-resuscitate-tattooed-on-his-chest-doctors-didnt-know-what-to-do/?utm_term=.86f96da86eff
  5. https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/dnr.shtml
  6. https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/dnr.html
  7. https://www.usalaw.com/blogs/dnr-tattoos-legal-ethics/
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

An Issue Of Medical Tattoos. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

To Play or not to Play Video Games

To play or not to play- that is the question. Adults say kids spend too much time on video games, while kids say it's a way to have fun. Why do kids like playing video games?They like playing cooperative games with their friends, and they like talking about it.They love the how many people play certain games so they get them too. They love the graphics in this game called shadow of the colossus remastered on the ps4.The new game has a lot better graphics then the old one ,for example the hair on the colossus actually moves with the wind.The most popular, least popular, most played, and most popular genre in video gamesThe most popular genre in the U.S is shooter games, so maybe you could play the most popular genre. The best game in the u.s. Based how many copies sold and how many people did play. IsTetris! know surprising right? The least popular game is... E.T: The Extra-Terrestrial! This is not that surprising to me at all, it was so bad they buried millions of copies in the desert! The top games in the world are WOW(World Of Warcraft), Dota 2, and LOL(League Of Legends). 27 million people play these games daily and 67 million play monthly that is surprising right, I mean 67 million people a month! Only about 1 million people live in all of Austin! 67 austins play those games a month! How many people play games in the U.S.?the answer is 150 million people play, which is almost half of the population of the U.S. The graphics of today have improved a lot since 1952.WOW is also the most grossing game which means brings in the most money.(the very first game is below) Graphics in the game Evolution.This is a 2017 game see how it looks realistic? Now, I will give you the worst game.Can you see how this is the worst game, I can. As you can also see the evolution of games from the assasins creed in 2007 to 2017. You can see how it has upgraded since 1970 a 50s. What happens when you play violent video games to long I will tell you.if your children play violent videoA mix of how many hours gamers play.It seems like most people play every day. Gamers spend at least 13 hours playing video games. Gamers play a video game or more a week.What is the best amount of time for people to play games daily? Scientists say that you should stay at 1-4 hours daily to stay happier than kids that play more often. many parents say so you can limit them to 1-4 hours a day at most they can play 28 hours a week 7 hours a least. So you can limit them but don't limit too much or they will not be as social or have a great satisfaction with life.but then what kids say is true they do have benefits unless they play too much.so kids should be able to play video games for benefits over people without video games.so kids if your parents say don't play video games you can tell them that it helps you if it's limited to a certain time 1-4 hrs only! A day. Parents let your kids play but only for 1-4 hrs a day.sometimes if children play violent video Bad violence, and the good amount of hrs to play video games.the violent games would be bad for your children as I will mention latergames they can be rebellious and take more risks.they can also become avid to video games, like gunman an elementary school kid.now a quote from Shaun There are plenty of skills I've learned from playing video games. It's more interactive than watching TV because there are problems to solve as you're using your brain. so there I leave my statement like that video games are good for you, in some ways.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

To Play Or Not To Play Video Games. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Job that i Love

I believe I have lived an interesting life. I have been adventurous and bold which has led me to amazing opportunities and life experiences. I also believe I have gone through most of my life feeling lost. Without a direction or purpose, I was constantly going in circles. With no direction, I was at a standstill. This led to me to allow my time to be taken up with distractions. One of those distractions being video games. I have played videos most of my life. It was something my older brother did. I played a lot but never excessively. I liked being outside and play sports while growing up. After high school, I usually only played during thunder and snow storms. I used to see how people became addicted to video games. I understood they were fun but couldn't understand that it was all they wanted to do. One day I came across a game that changed all that. The game was called Ark. The game was an open concept, where the players could used what the game offer and play it how they wanted. I liked this because it allowed for a lot of creativity. There were many different servers available. A server or gaming server is where someone purchases a server to get the core game and edit the options as they see fit for how they want people playing. They can edit the map, the settings, the rules, etc. They also are in change of that server. They police the server the way they see fit, even in an abusive matter if they so choose. I first started playing on servers where it was player verse player. This was where teams or individuals would battle each other using the game mechanics. That was fun and really didn't take up too much of my time. After about half a year of playing the game casually, my team decided they wanted to go on a different kind of server where it would require a lot more time and effort to accomplish things, to make it a bit of a challenge. I wasn't willing to put in that kind of time, so I decline the offer, and off they went. I was about to quit playing the game out of boredom, when I came across a type of server I have never seen before. It was called an RP server or roleplay server. I had heard of roleplay games like dungeons and dragons and stuff like that, but I never heard them played in video games. Being intrigued I started watching videos on the internet. As geeky as it seemed, it was an interesting concept. Most games you play you must play the game's characters and the game's storyline. In a RP server you play your character and you play your storyline. Being a creative individual, I was eager to give it a shot. The server was customized and built to fit the theme of a medieval era. Three hundred people from around the world were playing on it. So, when you went into game you interacted with other people. There were no computer characters, it was all real people on the other side of the character you interacted with. The server had its economy created by the people running the server called admins. The server was played with seasons. This meant every six weeks; the map would wipe and there would be a fresh start. You could continue your story or start anew. Everything else in the game was determined by the players through roleplaying out events. These were rules, leaders, and scenarios that could occur. Now I was average when it came to playing the actual game. I started on the server trying to learn the rules and figure out how people play this style of game play. I just put in a few hours a day. My schedule at the time allowed for a lot of spare time. After getting the hang of the play style and diving into the concept I found that I enjoyed the game play. I realized by the end of my first season I was rich because how I played the economy. I didn't use the game mechanics, but I used people skills, real people skills to get rich. By interacting with other characters and providing them with services in game, I became a sort of entrepreneur. I went on next season doing the same thing. This time I played with a big group, where last time I played more on my own, so I could get the hang of things. In the game I was face with many scenarios that I applied to real life and allowed me to build myself. For instance, I was working a job that was not going well at the time. This job had given me the most opportunity and experience any job had ever given me. It was the most I had ever been payed. But it was going in a bad direction. It was taking advantage of me and asking of me task that were truly impossible to complete. I was scared to quit. I feared that I wouldn't be able to find as good if not better of a job as this one. With other real-life situations and this game, I was able to give my two weeks' notice. My character in game wouldn't take crap, why should I. I went on playing the game. I got better with the concept of roleplay. Most people enjoyed my characters. This allowed me to attract skilled players and role-players to play in my group or for me to play in their group. This allowed me to pull off major storylines in game and acquire riches and other powerful items. Again, not being good at the game itself, but using people skills I thrived. Every season I came out rich. Every season I was some sort of ruler. I was even king once. On another character, I was a smaller ruler who owned the king. I made great strides in this false world. The problem was I had become addicted to the game. I would spend anywhere from 8 hours to sometimes 16 hours a day playing this game. I had signed up for summer classes to make my fall and spring semester schedule a bit liter. As the classes approached, I was telling myself I should quit and be done with the game. I should focus on school. I started my first class and instead of giving up the game, I gave up sleep. I went on playing. Being that successful in game and respected and loved, it was hard to give up. Through roleplay I created big adventures and storylines. Some of these led to a lot of action and wars. I was too far in. I couldn't be as effective in game because I, at the very least, made school the number one priority in my life. I was in a five-week class. Then what I would call a miracle happened. Due to the admin team, of the server, fighting and there being a lack of consideration from the admin team to the players on the server, the population started to drop big time. People left and banned together to create other servers. I quit the server because I was tired of the way the admin team was running the server and because the population drop made it less fun. Even though I had quit the server, I wasn't completely free yet. I was waiting to see which of the new servers was going to come out on top. I wanted to play on that one. As I was waiting I had this extra time I haven't had in a while. I begin to enjoy not logging into a game daily. I began to realize that it became like a job to play the game in the manner I was playing. I was working hard to create these successes in a world that didn't matter. It was nice not to deal with any petty drama or struggle of in game problems. I started to look at my current life. I wasn't as healthy as I could be. I was at a new job that I hated. Nothing in my real life was where I wanted it. I had spent so much time in game I forgot about real life. I created major successes in game but had not progressed in life at all. This bothered. I knew I was better than this. I knew that I knew better than to let a game take over my life, yet I had. Then I was hit with a thought. If I could be that successful in game just using people skills and creativity, why can't I be that successful in real life. It was at that moment I got to work. I worked on myself and my real life. Today, four months later, I have an amazing job that I love. I am the healthiest I have ever been, and I am the happiest I have ever been. Looking back, I don't know the exact number, but I was addict to this game for a year in a half. Most people hear that and say imagine what you could have done if you didn't waste a year and a half. I think about it too. Oddly enough I am glad I did. If I didn't I wouldn't be the person I am today. I wouldn't be in the position I am today. I would be somewhere, but I would of taken a different road. It took playing this game to see what I was real made of and the skills I must apply to move forward in life. So, I don't see my addiction as a failure, I see it as a lesson and a road I had to take to get to where I am today.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Job That I Love. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Sex and Violence in Video Games

Introduction

While the video game industry is still in it’s infancy, it has found many ways to educate us, be they in a positive or negative way. That said, being so young, it tends to borrow from existing media forms when creating content. The special thing about video games is that they are much more interactive than other forms of media.

While most media forms are ones that are created and then distributed or simply derive their significance from the referenced medium(such as watching a TV show or stating opinions online about that movie you just finished), these media forms generally cannot be changed when you receive them; that movie will always play out the same no matter how many times you play it, and that TV show will quickly become dated as it is most likely rooted in then current culture. Video games, on the other hand, are much more malleable in terms of how the experience plays out, especially on repeat plays. While no two reactions to the same movie or TV show are different, the experience that is provided by the medium itself(before being mediated through social location and such) is always the same. With video games, no two playthroughs will be exactly the same, neither will each player’s reception toward that playthrough. This variety in both given and received experiences separates video games from most media forms, mainly since the delivered content can’t be changed.

Metaphorically, it’s like filtering light. Most media forms have a single message that they transmit, like a colored laser.

The gaming medium, by contrast, can alter it’s presentation, like a laser that could change color each time it was fired. Overall, this would indicate a wide(ish) array of creative options when designing a video game. While they can havetheir target audience, they also have the ability to captivate the interest of demographics outside their own, deliberately or otherwise. While this wouldn’t mean much for those brands that see only one game and aren’t thought of again, this may be different for those franchises that have aged, especially as that age grows.

For the rest of this piece, I will be looking at the aging of the Pokemon franchise across it’s 20 year history, specifically looking at the increase of adult/mature/dark themes/tropes and how this relates to the age(s) of the franchises’ growing player base. To do this, I will be looking at several themes, including why the average age of gamers in general is where it is, what keeps gamers interested in long-runners, what kinds of mature innuendo makes it into games, and how this increase in maturity has bled into other properties associated with the franchise in particular.Literature ReviewAs for why the average age of gamers is what it is, a study conducted on about 4000 Hungarian gamers(Nagygy 2013) related age with gaming habits both spending and time investment, preference by genre, and proficiency(amateur or professional), while (Lawson, 2007) related age with compassion for virtual pets. The Hungarian study determined that, among other things, real-time strategy game players tended to be older, while role-playing-gamers tended to sink the most time into their games, while women tended to play games that didn’t go into any of the major genres studied (First Person Shooter, Role Playing Game, etc.)This may simply be due to the general size of RPG’s while RTS players tended to sink time as a means to improve at the game. That said, many RTS players’ age and preference may be linked because they have the flexibility to play whenever, a luxury which many young gamers can’t afford, likely due to nothaving the time necessary to devote to the task, while (Lawson, 2007) found a strong correlation between younger age and compassion for virtual pets, citing the successful marketing campaign of virtual pets to young children as proof. This would line up with the idea that audiences’ social location impacts how they approach a work and how they gleam meaning from it. This trend maycause audiences to tend to cluster around certain features of a work they like (creating fan art or interpreting what content means and sharing their findings). While these groups tend to overlap, there are still more isolated sectors of these groups that, given the examples above, either don’t care about fan art or can’t be bothered to process the complexities of their content.Some reasons why gamers tend to stick with long-running franchises are provided, though not directly, by a study regarding TV ratings surrounding soccer games( Mutz and Wahnschaffe 2016) and how they fluctuate over the course of the game. They found that the levels of excitement (suspense, uncertainty, What’ll happen next?) were driving factors when connecting the gamestate with ratings. If applied to gamers and long-running/older franchises, this can play out when a new installment of a franchise comes out, and the adopters of the previous iteration or fans from the old days gain an interest in the next one, asking what’s different about this one? or excitement over what has succeeded, sparking a new interest wave for adopters old and new. If the game does well among fans, it will continue to garner attention from said fans, alerting the developers/publishers what has worked so they can implement these successful designs into future creations.There has also been a disparity in what kinds of mature/adult/dark themes make it into video games.

While there is a rating system in place to inform consumers on what content they can expect to find in the game, these ratings are rather flexible in terms of what is acceptable in agiven game. (Haninger, Thompson, 2004), (Thompson, 2001), and (Downs, 2010) highlight some of these instances by compiling every instance of gameplay mechanics and/or presentation that warranted an ESRB content descriptor. They found that most of their samples contained violence, blood, or sexual themes, and female characters were likely to be sexualized over male ones, among other things. This is despite some of the games either having no descriptor when there is an instance or the researchers not finding an instance during their data-gathering sessionsdespite the content descriptor being attached. To be precise, it is those instances that don’t have descriptors assigned to them that I intend to focus on for this piece, as these are references that either weren’t deemed strong enough to warrant a notice or that escaped the eye of the censors. Some examples include the occasional blood splatter in a The Legend of Zelda game or a game that rewards player experimentation in very… erotic ways.

Seeing as this was one of the few readily available forms of erotic material, younger people jumped at the opportunity, and several convoluted methods were found to access these naughty pictures that the developers had put in as a reward for discovering this convoluted method. (Owens, 2012) examines the general impact of porn on young people. While these aren’t the only things that can slip past the censors, it generally shows what can. I’d theorize that developers put these kinds of easter eggs as rewards for exploration or to increase the audience that will derive enjoyment from the product by catering to their sensibilities and/or tastes. Finally, there has been some bleeding over from medium to medium regarding franchise content. For this line, we look at (Lapite, 2012) who examined sexual implications fromthe cartoon that the Pokemon franchise is derived from. Often times, the cartoon’s seasons tend to follow the same iterative pattern as the games, but the games are often ahead of the cartoon.

This has generally allowed for the plots of the cartoon to be much more developed than those of the then current iteration of the games. While it’s a different example than what the analyzer looked at, this one still illustrates the point; in the Sun and Moon iteration of the games, death is often not brought up in a direct manner.

Instead, it is often aluded to, although it is sometimes more obvious than others. IN the cartoon, however, the topic of death has already been discussed and depicted far more realistically, and two times at that. To return to the example being analyzed, the iteration of the games that that particular episode takes place in doesn’t have much in the way of objectionable content, while the cartoon that most likely came long after the games came out has far more eyebrow-raising themes despite both franchise branches being about the same age. This would indicate a very different target demographic between the cartoon and the games. This would again uphold the concept of social location shaping audience’s responses to media and how the writer/developers approach these interpretations. In the case of the cartoon, the themes that get presented are those of a rather amorous nature, while those presented in the game are of a more violence-implicative nature, which translates to what audiences tend to engage with the medium, and so developers/writers start to cater towards this new subset more and more, until heavy subjects like death and crippling failure are brought up regularly.Data/MethodsMy data gathering methods were quite simple. Using Google Scholar, I searched for terms such as Mature Content in Video Games and Content Ratings in order to narrow down research that pertained to the inclusion of mature content in video games whose target audience wouldn’t be able to perceive their significance.

For my media examples, since I have personal experience with the Pokemon franchise, I took rather basic plot summaries from a community-driven agrigation site known as Bulbapedia, as well as another community-driven website known as TV Tropes, a site dedicated to writing and storytelling conventions spanning every known medium. Given that these are subject to the pitfalls associated with community input, these examples are merely a starting point for locating such subversive content in the various Pokemon games listed, as well as providing some background for the more plot-relevantexamples of mature content. My coding scheme was very similar to (Haninger, Thompson, 2004)’s, where they classified various instances of violence, sexual themes, profanity, and substance use. The only deviation from this model is the inclusion of allusions to the above themes, as that type of innuendo is what usually makes up most of the examples.Findings As for what my media examples have provided in the realm of why older people are gaming more, this can be attributed to a few things; either those that played the games are staying with the franchise, or people that were exposed to the franchise’s popularity at an older age have come in with the introduction of Pokemon Go!, a mobile phone game based on the Pokemon games. We can see this with the release of Pokemon ?Let’s Go!’, an attempt by GameFreak, the source of the Pokemon games, to bridge the gap between Pokemon Go! Players and those of the main Pokemon games, combining old and new in an effort to unify the community.As the Pokemon franchise has gone on for over 20 years, there must be something that’skeeping the older players engaged enough to want to pick up the latest game. Like with the soccer ratings article above, we can see that the later games include many new features and/or quality-of-life improvements, as well as homages to the previous games. The main draw, however, is the Pokemon themselves.

There will usually be about 100 new Pokemon added to the list inn every new iteration, and most of the anticipation for that next iteration comes from what these new Pokemon are. Luckily, we are actually in an iterative shift, as the next major game to start the next iteration of the game series is due in late 2019, allowing for much anticipation/excitement to build. The games themselves also tend to retain interest by making callbacks to previous games, usually by connecting major characters or plot points from previous games to the current games, or by flat-out having previous characters make a return in some capacity. With this continued stream of interest, it’s no surprise that the franchise has continued for so long, and I see an equally long future ahead.Now for the interesting part; what kinds of mature content get’s included in these games.

Simply put, the amount of content that alludes to or outright states something that may be objectionable has steadily increased with the age of the franchise itself. We went from a loneold man exclaiming that a Pokemon Gym(not the workout kind) was great because …it’s full of women! to an old man whose wife recently died and is looking for some company in his remaining time because he’s just that lonely without his wife, to a group of old people who wax philosophical about the inevitability of old age and/or death including their own, with one old woman stating that, while she’s gotten a lot of plastic surgery and such to look as youthful as possible, her bones remind her of her true age, and an old man who compares life to the sun’s rising and setting. While these games have been rated E for Everyone(ages 6+) only older players will be able to truly grasp and/or appreciate the weight of what is being delivered to them. As noted by the team that content-analyzed Teen rated games, these allusions and philosophical statements aren’t seen as strong enough to warrant a content descriptor, despite how mentally exhausting it must be to process such themes as death, failure, and lingering regrets. This ultimately plays into what the developers want to do; reach a wider audience. If not directly through serious/complex plot threads, then through rewarding exploration and interaction through the interesting side missions like the one that features our philosophical elders from earlier or one that tasks you with returning a Pokemon that once belonged to a nowdead grandfather to his granddaughter for her to raise. This is the type of gameplay that many RPG players live for, as seen with ( Mutz and Wahnschaffe 2016)’s analysis of gamers and their place in the gaming community. While younger players may find the time to be able to partake in long play sessions that allow for exploratory periods, it is the older player base that are more likely to embrace an entire side story, while younger players may see only the reward at the end of a side mission or such.With the media bleeding effect discussed earlier, we can also see the increase of mature content when the game material itself is adapted into a cartoon form.

Pokemon Generations, an animated series of mini-episodes created to celebrate the franchise’s 20th anniversary by showcasing key moments across the games’ history, expands on some of the plot points from the games that they came from. In Pokemon X and Y, much of the main conflict is centered around AZ, an ancient king whose Pokemon wife(strange as it sounds) died during a war, and hisstruggle to live with himself after creating a machine to resurrect his wife using the life force of many Pokemon, only to convert it into a tool for ultimate destruction after his resurrected Pokemon left him in horror of what he had done in order to restore it, bringing the war, and many more lives, people and Pokemon alike, to an end in an instant. In the Pokemon Generations episode that focuses on this event, the story that was told in all of about 2.5 min. inthe game is played over a battle that the main character has with AZ at what is meant to be the end of the main game. This story is far more detailed and/or horrific, most likely owing to the fact there is actual voice-overs for it when there was none in the game.

This would indicate that even between faithful media adaptions, there can be an increase of the content’s maturity just by how that content is presented.ConclusionIn conclusion, we can see through the Pokemon franchise that while media creators can target a particular audience, they will try to appeal to a much wider audience than that target, and will often do so by incorporating content and/or allusions that would fly over the heads of the target audience while hitting those demographics that are also likely to consume that media, be it due to brand loyalty or because of simple curiosity. We can see this with media forms apart from video games, as the soccer TV ratings ( Mutz and Wahnschaffe 2016) and Pokemon cartoon (Lapite, 2012) analyses can attest to. With that, we can see how this, and other long-running franchises, can persist despite their aging roots. This will help in understanding the general life cycle of such long-runners, and may aid in standardizing the criteria for assessing what could make a good long-runner, allowing media creators to better expand their creativity to produce more complex, yet still manageable, franchises that adopters old and new can enjoy.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Sex And Violence In Video Games. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

I am against Video Games

I am against video games because they promote violence, game addiction and expenditure. Video games are good when life gets bored and monotonous with the same schedule every day, but people nowadays have made gaming as their profession, which affects them adversely. Some of the games improves our knowledge and prepare us against the violence that can be found around our surrounding. Video games also brings our family members, relatives and friends together, since multiple player can play and enjoy at the same time. Certain types of video games increase our thinking capacity and improves our brain functioning too. Video games can also be used as good source of teaching and learning tools. There are lots of games in the market where the players have to kill their opponent characters in the game for the victory. It is good until this remains only in the game, but the younger generation tend to implement the violence into their reality. Video games are giving wrong message to the children that those who have lots of guns and can kill everyone are the strongest one. People learn shooting in video games and try to act same in real life which causes death of lots of people. People who play violent type of video games usually get angry very quickly for even a simple cause which affects their social life negatively and may also take a life of others. Children spending most of the time playing video games have difficulty in differentiating their reality and fictional life as a result they think killing and fighting is the only way to solve the problem. Video games also include pornography and different types of women violence which conveys wrong message to the young generation and increases violence in the society. Addiction towards video game is found common. People who do not like to leave playing video games in any situation are said to be addicted towards video games. Video games are designed in such a way that it can easily seek many people's attention. Video games are designed in a sequence of difficulty level so, people would not be bored getting easy level and also people would not leave without playing thinking it's tough. The downfall of people starts when they are addicted to video games as they do not go to work. Addicted children always want to play video game and ruin their study. People get mentally sick being around the video games every moment. People lose their responsibility towards family members and friends due to addiction of video games. Addicted people are so busy with their games, that they do not clean their surrounding and themselves. Video games occupies huge amount of budget in anyone's expenses. Video gaming deals with a lot of technology. We need television, video games, controller and so on to enjoy gaming, which is not affordable by ordinary people. According to BestBuy, An XBOX ONE costs $299.99. This price is only for device, we also need to buy television and games for gaming which makes our gaming costlier. Lots of video games do not demand extra money at the time of buying but while we keep playing, we get options like upgrade characters, unlock next level, get extra lives and so on; which increases the expenses too. People get lots of health problems with their eyes and back pain by playing video games for long time which ultimately increases their expenses. Video games need electricity as the source of energy to operate which increases our electricity bill and adds an extra expense to people. The gaming company always try to make slight change in their new version of same game which makes people to spend extra money for the new version.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

I Am Against Video Games. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Video Games as Tools for Music Learning Adam Reyher

For as much length of time that pop culture has been near, most educators are obliged to state "Quit concentrating such a great amount on computer games and get your work done!". So what happens when we figure out how to include the exercises individuals love to do as a solid lead to appropriate teaching style? Adam Reyher's thesis from Popular Culture and Video Games as Tools for Music Learning presents that “Relationships are like sharks: they have to keep moving forward or they die. “For music education to remain relevant and provide value, it too must change with the times or experience the fate of the stationary shark.”(1) It concerns the significance of how to make music instruction important. At first this paper gives itself as a window into what great can emerge out of by being educated by out-of-the-crate strategies as it invigorates the intelligence of students. Reyher states, "We accomplish this with innovative music lessons- choosing to incorporate concepts that entice and please students while still providing a valuable and educationally sound experience "(1). These distinctive strategies demand enhancing the training structure by utilizing present day and conventional interests, this situation incorporates Nintendo Wii video game to show of what potential the games carry. Games can be useful because it allows students to get instant responses, feedback and practice sessions. This connects with the ease to students and their interests combined. There are many advantages of using it like providing feedback, it automatically collects information like student’s ability and allow the instructor to spend time on that student. It is most helpful in group participation and competitions. It is one of innovative sources to use in the classroom. Article mostly focuses on how the various forms of games have their unique effect. The idea presented is that the traditional ways combined with the new technology can help teachers to teach the music which is more updated and relevant till date. Reyher's composed piece for the Music Educator's Journal demonstrates his case with dependable precedents from his very own encounters. A basic purpose of his article includes present day culture as a staple to "deep immersion" of students with the fortifications of music goals, for example, with the consideration of computer games. The creator invigorates his point of view with the case of the computer game, Rhythm Heaven Fever, a rhythm game for the Wii gaming console developed by Nintendo Co., where it involves music with intuitive instances of beat and mood, "The player utilizes the Wii remote to include the best possible rhythmic sets and patterns utilizing blend of any one- or two button combinations possible. In the event that the player gives off base info (rhythm, steady beat, etc.), the game will necessitate the activity to be rehearsed until amended. In the wake of finishing the "practice," the real game starts. Throughout the game, the game gives opinion, including onscreen character responses, negative aural alarms, and negative visual cautions, for example, moans, glares, or jumping by the characters". The author depicts the computer game as an amusement hole, however has cleared a street for youthful people to get a handle on the learning of rhythm, beat, chords and basic music theory. Since Rhythm Heaven Fever does not give dynamic criticism, the instructor and friends can take an interest and provide knowledge with their own assessments. A restricting hypothesis says that these practices of utilizing computer games may end up jumbled and with this may present more harm to learning process over the long haul. A case of this would knowledge understudies jumping into the diversion without further investigation of the training then they miss on the calculated learning. "A alarm of this event, in any case, should not keep music instructors from incorporating contemporary culture and technological assets into their classrooms", Reyher handles that in the event that a rational educational goal and result is arranged, it forces an useful experience instead of wasted instructional time, "Instructors can make different sorts of lesson plans utilizing computer games, incorporating plans with individual and team work but also assigning objectives, instructors can equip their students with energizing and advancing musical experience that explain vital concepts in a significant way.". From a typical point of view of the person who is unaware of the most recent patterns that motivate learners to learn and develop is to realize that the pop culture has given a solid impact to educators willing to philosophize, make hypotheses and put them on repeat. Current systems have considerable evidence that these practices have turned into an achievement in the territory of formal instruction. At last, presence of computer games, music and cell phone have positive advantages on learning and memorizing. A case study uncovers that kids who are keen on cell phones may be increasingly drawn in with scholarly material exhibited on smart phones instead of causal paper. Singapore pursues the case of this hypothesis by permitting a agreeable game referred to as EcoRangers as a learning instrument. The amusement is at first intended for advanced mobile phones, and it was transformed into the social investigations program for school grades nine and ten. This demonstration brought about progressively energized students association, and the schoolchildren started to understand that they took in the material for a formal instructive environment. In general, Reyher claims to his readers with his understanding as a tutor that needs to comprehend his students. He develops his hypothesis with his prime concern on the students and what they appreciate, "Music teachers are not confined to computer games or other explicit innovations. Interesting lectures can be made by gathering motivation from different regions in contemporary culture". The author of this article justifies his proposition, eventually turning it into a positive engagement. Reyher's training surely demonstrates that it is helpful to music theory by enabling students to be occupied with their lessons and motivate improvement inspired in a friendly competition environment. Clear and compact, the author shares his individual learning strategies make it fun and an intuitive learning practice, not limited to computer games, but rather films, shows, famous music and TV. A knowledgeable society can keep up with being more than just organized, however a careful knowledge among every student, this begins by coordinating with modern generation by including what their world revolves around. Music teachers are not limited to computer games or other explicit advancements. Inventive and interesting lessons can be made with motivation from different zones in present-day society!
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Video Games As Tools For Music Learning Adam Reyher. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Sara Soto American Revolution

Economic Reasons, self-determination, and grievances all took part in the cause of the American Revolution. The Americans were angry because the British forced Americans to pay taxes on goods. The Americans were tired of unfair treatment and laws so they decided to revolt to start their own country.

Causes : The Reasons Why The Americans Revolted

The American Revolution began due to colonists having no voice in Parliament, economic reasons involving trade,and unfair laws and treatment. Having no voice in Parliament was a cause that led to the American Revolution because the Americans had a lot of self-determination. This was important because the Americans wanted to have their own colonial governments and legislatures. Another one of the American Revolution's main causes was economic reason economic reasons involving trade. This helped lead to a revolution because colonists were required to buy and sell goods only with Britain. The last reason of the American Revolution was unfair laws and treatment because the Americans wanted to be treated fairly. This was important because the way the British were treating the Americans was harsh and uncalled for. In conclusion the American Revolution began due to colonists having no voice in Parliament, economic reasons involving trade, and unfair laws and treatment.

Outcomes: Change for America

The American Revolution changed the U.S by declaring to separate from Great Britain, having their own country,and having their own government. One of the American Revolution's main outcomes was separating from Great Britain. This meant that the U.S was going to be its own country. Due to the American Revolution the U.S became its own country. This was important because the U.S could have its own regulations now. The last outcome of the American Revolution was the U.S having their own government and laws. This was vital to the American Revolution because lots of Americans were very happy with having their own set of rules and being free from the British. The American Revolution led to fairness for the Americans and changed the U.S by being free and not controlled.

A Popular Opinion

I think the American Revolution was successful because the Americans now had freedom and rights unlike when they were with Britain. One reason that the American Revolution was successful is because the Americans had their own government.This shows that the revolution was successful because the Americans had to follow the British government and with their own government it shows that the Americans were independent. Another reason on why the American Revolution was successful is because the Americans also had now there own laws and rights. This was important because Americans did not have to oblige with the harsh rules of the British. The last reason on why the American Revolution was successful is because the Americans now had there own country. This was vital to the Americans because the Americans would consider themselves self-independent and self-determined.In conclusion the American Revolution was successful by believing in the values of the Americans which were self determination, self worth for making a government, and independent because they having their own laws.






Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Sara Soto American Revolution. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Occurrence American Revolution

The American Revolution

The Occurrence American Revolution was justified as it had tremendous ramification on different spheres of the American nation. The revolutionary war affected the politics, economy and democratic advancement and contributed to the emancipation of the American people from the oppressive rule of the British.

The fact that the American Revolution led to the development of a democratic American Nation cannot be underestimated. It is relevant to note that the freedom that America achieved from the yokes of the British colonialist is identified as a model of democratic principles and has equally influenced many other countries in the world. The American war, therefore, affected America in gigantic proportions. Argument It is important to propose that the American Revolution is considered the longest military conflict that occurred in America before the Vietnam War. The American War of Independence occurred between the years of 1775-83 and had the objective of freeing the American nation from the influence of the British colonialism (Allison 57).

The aftermath of the war was the realization of independence of the United States. It is evident that Britain had colonized the United States for a long time. The revolution was therefore tailored to free the United States from the oppressive grip of the British colonialists. It is clear that the American Revolution was justified as it played a significant role towards the freedom of the United States from the British rule. It equally influenced political decisions and triggered the occurrences of other revolutions in different parts of the world. The revolution was justifiedas it offered the minorities an opportunity to be freed from the oppressive policies of the white majorities. It is evident that the African Americans and Indian Americans had been discriminated and segregated by the white majorities.

The whites, therefore, believed that in case of war, this groups of people would voluntarily support Britain in order to emancipate themselves. The revolution was necessary because it was a culmination of ten years of unfriendly relationship between the American colonies and the British colony. The revolution, therefore, spread rapidly in April 1775 through the military gunfire. This was the beginning of the revolutionary war that led to the emergence of the new American nation. The American colonies were against the proposed form of leadership that was being advocated for by Britain. The idea of themonarch was violently opposed by the colonies. There was controversy on how the electorate would make their voices heard through the elections.

It is, however, important to note that despite the revolution decisions, the American nation has come out as an oasis of democratic governance as it has been a representation of democratic principles that have not only positioned the nation in an enviable position but equally spread the same principles to other countries. The American nation has insistently prioritized implementation of the bill of rights with the passage of the new constitution that has stabilized the American nation. The democracy that has been achieved in the United States through the adoption of the constitution has helped in the formation of a government. The constitution and democratic principles adopted by the US has led to the empowerment of the citizens in tremendous ways.

It is true that the United States was able to form a truly democratic government in 1776 after the provincial congress drafted the Bill of right as well as the constitution. After the constitution and declaration of rights were passed, it fundamentally guaranteed basic rights to the citizens. The Patriots followed suit by the adoption of the bill of rights before forming governments on their respective states. This reinforced the reasons why the colonies were determined to gain their liberty by fighting what was considered to be the oppressive colonial government. The constitution embraced the importance of personal freedoms among American citizens.

The creation of the creation of the new government that was based on democratic principles was a big achievement for the United States. The passage of the constitution passed the sovereignty authority to the people but not individuals. The idea of the government of the people and for the people, therefore, justified the revolutionary vision of the people. In a nutshell, the United States has continually advocated for the creation of a government based on written democratic principles.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Occurrence American Revolution. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Revolutionary Soldiers were Altogether

Revolutionary soldiers were altogether different from British soldiers and mercenaries. In battle this had a major affect. They battled savagely, brilliantly, and viably. While the Colonists were dwarfed generally, the Americans really had many favorable circumstances. This fight was taken extremely close to home to the Colonists since they were battling for a reason they had confidence in. the British warriors were battling on the grounds that it was their duty, while Americans were battling for their freedom.

Battling on their own ground turned into a major preferred standpoint since they knew the landscape, streets, mountain passes, and bog grounds of the provinces. Another vast colonial advantage was the battling styles executed by the contradicting armed forces. British soldiers had prepared in the conventional terminating line techniques utilized by European armed forces, yet numerous colonial soldiers were frontiersmen familiar with chasing little prey. This made them great marksmen.

By the midpoint of the war, this preferred standpoint prompted an extreme change in the manner in which American soldiers were prepared. One last advantage,and maybe the best of all, was leadership. All over the ranks,the provinces had able men who realized what they were doing. While most British administrators had broad military preparing, their commanders regularly despised each other, held vendettas,and often couldn't help contradicting one another. Likewise, in the British Army, where a man could purchase a commission for himself for his child, it was standard to name and advance officers dependent on family ties and titles of respectability, steadfastness to the Crown, and political associations.

Interestingly, the Continental Congress and George Washington advanced officers dependent on individual legitimacy and execution on the war zone. Alongside the favorable circumstances came the impediments which were the low number of supplies and small financing of the war. They had high inflation and assumed the job of the underdog. Native Americans were likewise by and large more steady of the British since it was the Americans who were endeavoring to take their territory.

The British likewise had some significant points of interest over the Americans. The greatest preferred standpoint was an expert armed force. While Americans handled moment men and created an armed force dependent on the state army the British shaped for the French and Indian War (Seven Years War), the British had the absolute most experienced warriors on the planet, and a chain of command to help them. The Continental armed force was generally comprised of volunteer army from various states amid the initial couple of years and were no great in close battle and would regularly break arrangement and run. some did not know how to load and shoot a weapon appropriately. In any case, the British had a few drawbacks.

Beginning off with The British battled a war a long way from home. Military requests, troops, and supplies at times took a very long time to achieve their goals. The British had an amazingly troublesome target. They needed to convince the Americans to surrender their cases of freedom. For whatever length of time that the war proceeded with, the colonists' case kept on picking up legitimacy. The geographic endlessness of the states demonstrated an obstacle to the British exertion. In spite of possessing each real city, the British stayed as off guard. The war was costly and the British populace discussed its need. In Parliament, there were numerous American sympathizers. At long last, the partnership with the French gave Americans bravery and an unmistakable risk that tipped the scales to support America.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Revolutionary Soldiers Were Altogether. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The American Revolution is not an Accurate

The American Revolution is not an accurate name for what transpired in North America in the 1770's to the 1780's. A far more accurate name for what went down would be: The White American Revolution. The American Revolution in many ways reinforced the Patriot's relationship and commitment of that relationship to slavery. That's not to say that new ideas of liberty and equality were not surfacing as well, but in the pledge of allegiance to this new country, this so-called liberty and justice for all definitely came with terms and conditions - those conditions being that liberty and justice was only available to white Americans. If you differed from said conditions, sorry - liberty and justice were out of stock for the most part.

While The American Revolution brought about ideas of liberty and equality that were non-existent before, these ideals didn't apply to everyone and in a lot of ways the Revolution accomplished the exact opposite when it involved African Americans and slavery. Going into the Revolution, African Americans knew that they would not be immediately given all of the rights of a free man. This is exemplified in Peter Bestes, Sambo Freeman, Felix Holbrook, and Chester Joie's 1773 Letter to Local Representatives. They wrote this letter along with other slaves and in it, state that they were, very sensible that it would be highly detrimental to our present masters, if we were allowed to demand all that of right belongs to us for past services; this we disclaim. This statement shows that the slaves knew that going into the Revolution that things would be somewhat different for them.

They were still on board with and supported The Patriots. It was at the time thought to be important to the preservation of the Union to keep a balance of sorts of votes from both slave states and free states. So yes, there was in a sense a paradox developing between the beliefs about freedom, liberty, and equality by the Patriots and the hypocrisy they exhibited when it came to stretching these beliefs to the African American slaves. The fact of the matter was that, the sentiments of the American Revolution and the equality evoked by the Declaration of Independence stood in contrast to the status of most black Americans. Despite this, thousands of black Americans fought against the British in hopes of a new order.

Despite the disclusion African Americans faced and the hypocrisy the Patriots so blatantly practiced, the African American Slaves knew that they were getting nowhere under the current regime, and the promise of a new one - even if it wasn't perfect - still inspired hope in all of them. The Emancipation Proclamation was a huge step for African American slaves, but it in no way equated to complete freedom. For starters, The Emancipation Proclamation only applied to the states that were in rebellion. This was in order to help the troops so that African Americans could help fight in the war.

Of course, they were always the ones on the front lines - fighting someone else's war. They too had much to gain from a win, but it was still an abuse of power on behalf of the white Patriots. The initial intent of the war wasn't for the freedom of slaves - but for the preservation of the Union. The narrative only changed after The Emancipation Proclamation was passed. The way that African Americans were treated during The American Revolution is a perfect example of the limits that even so-called radicals have.

The term radical somewhat implies a certain selflessness - you picture a people's hero. Someone that is fighting or, well for liberty and justice for all after all. This was not the case during the American Revolution - or as we call it in this paper - The White American Revolution. The Patriots fought for themselves and each other, this much is true. The limit came when deciding who was included in the narrative - who was really included in each other. Unfortunately, that was where the line was drawn between Americans and African Americans.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The American Revolution Is Not An Accurate. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Justification of the American Revolution

Justification of the American Revolution

In the mid-1700s, the thirteen American colonies launched an uprising which was aimed at gaining independence from Britain. The Americans were questioning Britain's authority and this had begun as early as the French and Indian war . The Americans were in every right, aspect as well as mind to take action against the British. The choice of rebelling against the British through launching a war against them was the only choice they had. The diplomatic steps taken before had ceased to stand a chance against the brutal Britain. The American had used diplomatic means like sending letters to the Britons, an option which didn't bear fruits. Hence, this was a good reason to indicate that the Americans were justified to launch a rebellion.

The Americans were justified to launch a revolution because the Britons were making laws which would take away certain rights from the people. Britain didn't use her power in such a way that it would benefit them and the American people. They took control of what the people could and couldn't trade with. The laws were good ideas to the king, but not the best to the Americans. Hence, the British were missing this aspect in their colony and this led to the American Revolution. The Americans wanted to relieve themselves from these oppressive laws from the Britons.

Additionally, the American Revolution was justified because of a massacre which was carried out by the Britons. Research shows that the Americans completely changed the way they viewed Britain. The picture of how the massacre occurred shows that winning the hearts of the Americans again would be very difficult. It occurred in such a way that the Britons randomly fired on the crowd, not just a particular area. The picture indicates that the British were very organized and out to kill the Americans . A simple picture shows that the British troops had a desire to kill people and this can been seen from their organization. The picture clearly portrays the Britons as murderers and this was a good reason to warrant a revolution.

The king had total control and power over the Americans and could do what he deemed necessary to control them. In this case, he didn't care about the people's feelings and instead of adopting policies which would make them happy, his decisions were centered on making the government better. In the long-run, the government was to be made happy by the king through generating a lot of money. One of the ways the king was raising money was through taxing the Americans heavily. Any time the king made a law which the people of America didn't like, it would backfire on him and this would lead to more uprisings. The people became unhappy and this led to a rebellion against the Briton.
Arguments which Americans Levied Against the British and their Counterclaims

One of the arguments the Americans levied was that the king's legislation was oppressive to the people. Additionally, the people of America argued that the king instituted these legislations without the people's consent even though they would affect them. Some of the legislations were high taxes as well as preventing the people from trading freely. The Britons on the other hand argued that all these legislations were passed for the common good of the government and the people. The taxes were meant to create a perfect government for the people of America. Additionally, they argued that they had the right to tax the Americans, just like other colonies. However, the government turned too oppressive and this led to a rebellion.

The Americans also questioned the relationship between their local, colonial, which were the elected bodies and the British parliament in which the Americans were not represented. The Americans on their side argued that only the elected bodies had the legitimate power to impose taxes. However, in this case, the king and the British parliament in which the Americans were not represented had the power to impose taxes. The Britons countered this claim by arguing that even in England, most of the citizens didn't vote for delegates to parliament .

Additionally, they also argued that all the citizens of England enjoyed a virtual representation in the parliament which represented their interests. The argument was meant to show that the British parliament had the power to impose taxes on the Americans even though they were not represented. However, this was a distasteful part to the Americans because they had been electing their legislators for a long time.

How the World would View the American Colonists Today

In the today's world, the colonist would be viewed as oppressive and less democratic. Imposing taxes on people who are not represented in the taxing body was a form of oppression . Additionally, denying the people the chance to elect their leaders and trade freely wasn't democratic. To show that this is oppression, the current situation in the United States as well as Britain is that the people are taxed by democratically instituted bodies and laws.

However, this wasn't the case in America in the colonial era. Another example lies in the fact that the poor and the rich are taxed differently in the two countries. During the colonial era, especially in America, all the people were taxed equally whether rich or poor. Finally, in today's world, essential and non-essential commodities are taxed differently. However, the case of America shows that tea and paint were taxed equally which wasn't fair.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Justification of the American Revolution. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

An Empire Divided

Introduction

In the book, An Empire Divided: The American Revolution and the British Caribbean, the author Andrew Jackson O'Shaughnessy takes up a relatively unexplored topic from the early history of the United States and the Caribbean. He was not hesitant in letting the reader know the uniqueness of his book several times. Andrew O'Shaughnessy studied at Bradford School as well as the Oriel College; for his higher education, he went to the prestigious University of Oxford. He has a long and distinguished career in teaching and has been in the faculty of Eton College, Southern Methodist University in Dallas.

He has been a professor in the American History in the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh and been a chair of History Department. In this book, Andrew O'Shaughnessy gives very convincing arguments in favor of his stance with solid literary and historical evidences. This is why it makes the book a convincing set of literature on the American Revolution especially how the British Caribbean affected it and vice versa. Content The book is written to explore the socio-political realities surrounding the mainland US, how they affected the American Revolution and in turn how the surrounding regions like the Caribbean were affected by the revolution.

The author is focused on the common things that the mainland USA and the Caribbean shared as well as the differences which existed between the two regions. The overwhelming commonalities didn't trigger the Caribbean States to take an active part in the rebellion. In the book, the author gives many reasons for the inactivity of the British Caribbean; for example, their relative seclusion from the mainland America, the naval dominance of the British around the islands, their dependence on trade as well as their political dependence on the British fearing the inner possibility of slave revolts.

Thesis The thesis of the book is about the role of the British Caribbean and how it was affected by the revolution in turn. The central theme of the book is the fact that the British Caribbean had the same and possibly more incentives to rebel against the British just like their continental counterparts in the mainland US; however, they still didn't go for it. All the conditions in the thirteen colonies that rebelled existed in the Caribbean as well but they seemed to be passive in their bid against the British rule. The factors which contributed to this behavior were the key focus of the writer in the book.

The author has been so convincing that it is hard to disagree on most of his points and therefore, I support the author on most of the points. There has been a bigger slave population in the Caribbean and the fear of a revolt had always been a reality. The geographical nature of the Caribbean also made them more dependent on the British. This is the reason why even having the same and possible reasons to revolt, they did not take up the arms against the British. Main body The book has been quite convincing throughout from the start to its end. The key focus of the book, as discussed before, is how the American Revolution was affected by the behavior of the British Caribbean.

The author states that the inclusion of the Caribbean in the Revolution would have helped the continental cause and it would have considerably affected the British interests in the region. However, as the time would prove, they were less enthusiastic about the revolution as compared to their counterparts in mainland America. The surprising thing that the author points out is that the British colonies in the Caribbean had the same socio-political dynamics as they were in the thirteen colonies that rose up against the British but the still they refused to join the rebel cause.

It was surprising for me as I didn't know a lot about that before but the author puts it so skillfully that it was easy to get his point and get a clear picture on this vast subject. O'Shaughnessy gave many reasons that could have led to this behavior on part of the Caribbean States. He provided multiple literary pieces of evidence on the subject, especially how the previous researches had taken up the subjects. There have been many explanations given by contemporary historians on why the British Caribbean didn't join the rebels, and the author cites them appropriately. It is always a sign of a comprehensive research if the opinions of the multiple authors are also presented appropriately.

However, it was also noted by O'Shaughnessy that most of the researches on the topic had been incomplete and mere speculations. In this book, the author aims to fill that gap and tries to understand the causes with more clarity and research. This is another good thing about the book; I think it only makes it more credible in its own right on this particular issue. Several points that the author makes which he thinks explain the causes of the inactivity from the part of the British Caribbean was due to the fact that they depended on the British trade.

Additionally, the naval dominance of the British navy was so considerable that it would have been difficult for them to successfully rebel. Secondly, the internal social dynamics of the Caribbean were vastly different from that of America. There was a larger slave population in the Caribbean than it was in North America; this was one of the reasons why they could not afford the risk of facing an external threat. The one thing that I think the book lacked is that it lacked the appreciation of deep military and political dynamics. For example, although the author does mention that the British Navy was one of the biggest deterrents for the Caribbean colonies to join the rebels, I think it was insufficient. I think it was one of the biggest causes of the passive behavior of the Caribbean States.

Conclusion

The book has been written very flawlessly and the research, references to the contemporary literature, as well as the arguments all converged to make it very convincing. The author skillfully puts forth his arguments stating that the British Caribbean had all the reasons to rebel against the British colonial rule but didn't do it because of the few overlying political and social dynamics. The fears of revolt from its slave population as well as their reliance on sea trade made it difficult for them to challenge the British authority. The British dominance of the seas was also a significant deterrent in this regard. The island nature of the region and the demographic and social realities was what made them more obliging to the British. There were a very few points that I disagree on but those still don't make the book less credible.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

An Empire Divided. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Revolutionary War

I'm sure you've heard of the American Revolution or maybe the Revolutionary War? The American Revolution was a very harsh as well as hard time for our country. This war was fought between American Patriots in the thirteen colonies and the British men. Due to growing and increasing tensions between residents of Great Britain's 13 colonies located in North America as well as other factors. A very important factor that impacted the way this arose was the French and Indian war.

The French and Indian war had a very strong impact on the Revolutionary war. You may not know what the French and Indian war is and may be asking yourself, what it was. Well the French and Indian war, also known as the Seven Years' War was basically the North American conflict between Great Britain and France. There were indeed a series of battles led to the official British declaration of war in 1756.1 This war lasted from 1756 to 1763, which formed a monarchical or royal struggle between Britain and France. The war was fought to see who was going to have control of the Ohio River Valley. During the war there was many Americans as well as Indians who allied with the French. At last the Seven Years' War ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris which took place in February of 1763.

How does this convey the Revolutionary War? Well before ever getting into the French and Indian War, Great Britain had gained control of Massachusetts which helped expand throughout North America. During this time period, this made Britain one of the greatest empires around the world. As expected, Great Britain wanted to keep their power up so they started enacting rules as well as regulations that regarded traded goods. Like in every country corruption and bribing is present so many of the colonists often bribed officers and resorted to smuggling, in addition to boycotting. The only problem with this was that England began to strictly enforce restrictions during the French Indian War. As you may or may not of expected it, this angered many of the colonists as they could no longer get away with what was once a simple act regarding money.

Think of it as a domino effect, the Sugar act was just the first piece to fall down. At the end of the day the Sugar Act was really what started everything. Although the sugar act was an attempt to raise taxes it was resented poorly by the colonists and only encouraged them to protest around the colonies. That same year of 1764 the Stamp Act is passed, this act imposed taxes on a variety of printed materials. The colonists claimed this as a violation of their rights and responded with violent actions. The following year the quartering act was passed. Although this act was strongly resisted it not only required the colonies to provide housing but they also required them to provide food to the British troops.

During this period the Sons of Liberty became a thing. This was one of the many ways the colonists resisted against the British force before having to go to War. The sons of Liberty are now famously known by their well-known motto of, No taxation without representation. This group was started by Samuel Adams and included a few violent methods. They organized protests against what they perceived as unfair taxation and boycotts against taxed goods. Their purpose was to show the British government their discontent with taxes imposed on them without representation in Parliament They began stockpiling weapons and bullets as well as gun powder.

After this the Declaratory Act was passed which basically gave Parliament full power and control over statues and the making of laws after the Stam Act got shut down. The Townshend acts followed that, and placed taxes on imported goods. This causes Sam Adams to react by writing a letter which states that his rights are being violated and it is unconstitutional. He also says they have no authority to violate the British constitution and argues that we should be taxed by our own American government. This causes the British government to close the Massachusetts assembly line and the colonists quickly anger.

They rely on violence and make it impossible for taxes to even be collected.
In the following years many other events occur, like the Boston Massacre were three men are killed and two men are wounded. Parliament late passes the tea act and the Sons of Liberty don't react so good to it. The Sons of Liberty attack British merchant ships and throw 342 crates of tea into the water, this event is known as the Boston tea party. The last significant acts which made the Americans realize the war was their last option were the Coercive Acts, also known as the intolerable acts. These acts closed the ports of Boston until the colonists payed for all the tea that was lost during the Boston tea party. This was basically the government's way of punishing them for throwing the tea as well as trying to get all the money lost back.

In conclusion, the French and Indian war had a great impact on how the American Revolution came to place. The French and Indian war basically gave the North American territories to Britain. This led to North America being controlled by Britain and caused them to experience unfair tyranny. Although many people argue that the American Revolution has no justification at the end it does. Not only were British lives lost but so were many American lives as well.

So many families that fought out there just to gain freedom, rights, and a better tomorrow for our country, America got sick and tired of the unfair treatment they were experiencing and s stated before, they realized war was their only resource left. If it was not for the French and Indian war maybe we would still be a part of France and maybe our country would not be where it is at rignt now. But once again who knows what could have happened. At the end of the day the American Revolution helped create what we are now and helped us realize how unfair the tyranny was and it was just going to get worse from there.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Revolutionary War. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Latin American Revolution

The Latin American Revolution

During the early 18th century the creoles played a major role in the Latin America revolution. Several countries were fed up with the Spanish control because of the reforms forced onto them. Keeping in mind this occurred while they faced oppression from the natives' due to the fact they were not accepted as natives themselves. This on top of economic, social and political struggles sent them over the edge. The creoles wanted to be at the top of the social class for a change instead of at the very bottom and they thought independence would gain them power and the strength needed to defeat peninsulares.

As a result, the South American continent banded together to overcome Spain's corruptive rule. The movements prospered under leaders Simn Bolivar (the Liberator) of the North and Jos de San Martin of the South. Following their efforts, came the independence these colonies had been waiting for. Majority of the region implemented sovereign nations and could now make their own decisions as they saw fit. Thanks to the creoles courage to stand up against the Spanish, Latin American countries got the chance to experience freedom!!

Introduction/Body

There were 4 major causes of the Latin American Revolution. First were the problems of the Spanish Empire. Starting with their political problems, the colonies were run by Spanish governors who were dictators. One person made all the rules and the rules were set up to benefit the Spanish governors which was not good. Spain had the first right to colonial goods and resources; therefore, all the goods went to Spain first. This made the colonies mad that they produced all these goods but could not even enjoy them. Colonies could only trade with Spain too, and they set all the prices for goods.

Quite a bit of racism took place towards people who were not blood born Europeans. In the social hierarchy, Native Spaniards (Peninsulares) were the highest class. The peninsulares made up a very small percentage of the population. Underneath them were the people of pure European blood who were born in the new world (creoles). Combing African + blood born Europeans (Mulattos) and Indian + blood born Europeans (Mestizos) made up the third class. Lastly came the pure Indians and Africans sitting at the bottom. They had no right or privileges and were shunned against by the rest of the community.

Another cause was the enlightenment (a new way of thought in Europe). The people believed God placed Kings in royal position and he was the only one. After being enlightened people thought the government was meant to be based on a contract between the king and the people. Rights of life, liberty and property were to be protected under any circumstances and if they were not, citizens have the right to rebel.
Next the American Revolution gave hope to Latin America that they were capable of overthrowing their mother country.

And lastly but certainly not least, The French Revolution again proved success could be found in fighting for Independence. The Haitian Revolution came to existence because of social disagreements between Gens de couleur (free people of color) and the French settlers. Slaves ended up overthrowing the French settlers thanks to the former slave and military leader Toussaint Louverture. Religion was used as a tactic to initialize the revolution. Specifically, Haitians Vodou priest Boukman who inspired slaves to rebel

Napoleon Bonaparte

French Military leader and emperor Napoleon Bonaparte helped give the South American colonies a blueprint towards Independence to follow after. With his powerful imperial army Napoleon invaded Spain and Portugal highlighting Spain's weakness in the process. Venezuela felt that they did not owe their obedience to Spain anymore and this gave a push for the movement.

Argentina's Independence from Spain

Argentina was the first region to make a move towards independence. Jos De San Martin a creole himself from northeastern Argentina, stepped up to bring his home country justice once and for all. San Martin had an epiphany that the only thing standing between Argentina and success was, the liberation of the Andes provinces. Immediately putting the plan into action, he began training the Army of the Andes which consisted of a large portion of black and mulatto (people of west African-European descent) volunteers. Once they were prepared they crossed the mountains into Chile, freeing them from the royalists.

He guided his locals against Britain with a victory, also taking Uruguay down with it. Now they had come to a great realization, Spain's protection was no longer needed for them to prosper. Unfortunately, his social reforms failed so San Martin went back to Argentina to fight remaining Spanish troops.

Venezuela's Independence from Spain

Contrasting to the viceroyalty of La Plata (Argentina) the viceroyalty of New Granada in northern South America had less creoles. They were made up of the countries Venezuela, Columbia, Ecuador, and Panama. In order for the fight for independence to be successful they had to get assistance from the pardos. Strong armies were built up by Simn Bolivar who liberated northern South America. Bolivar was born in Venezuela into a wealthy Creole family. After watching Napoleon's legacy, Bolivar longed for a constitutional republic and the ideals of liberty and popular sovereignty. He participated in the congress of juntas that declared outright independence for Venezuela in 1812, against the resistance of royalists. San Martin decides to leave to live in Spain and by 1824 Bolivar defeats all remaining Spanish forces. Simon helped Venezuela revolt in 1820 by bringing in his troops to defeat the royalist army. He resigned positon as President in 1830.

The Bol­var-San Martin Encounter

Jos de San Martin and Sim?n Bol­var did not see eye to eye in the reshaping of Latin America. They met in 1822 to settle how to remove the Spanish from Peru and the following was addressed. It was noted that Bol­var was in a better geographic location than San Martin to send military forces into Peru. However, Bol­var was not one hundred percent confident in his military's abilities because they were not used to fighting in the high altitudes. San Martin favored monarchial rule while Bol­var preferred republicanism and Creole Oligarchic rule. When San Martin resigned from his duties it was concluded he probably concluded that it was not likely for South America to have a monarchy. Meanwhile Bolvar's vision came true that Latin America would see small independent republics in the near future.

Peru's Independence from Spain

Six years later Spanish forces are defeated by Peru and they gain their independence as well. It took a few decades for Peru, Chile and Bolivia to work out territorial disputes; The War of Pacific brings the feud to an end resulting in Chile annexing Peruvian and Bolivian lands. The tragic part was the damage left behind in Peru from Chilean troops. Years of work put into their economy was pulled right out from under them and it was only partly replenished. Political stability finally came around under the presidency of Nicol?s de Pi?©rola who brought reforms to fix the brokenness.

Revolutionists from the outside freed Bolivia, also known as Upper Peru. Creole uprisings continued to be unsuccessful from 1808 until 1814. It was not until 1822 once Bol­var took interest in Upper Peru and sent two expeditions into the region, that success was found. Bolivia finally claimed their independence on January 5, 1825. Three months later the last of the royalists were defeated and Bol?­var was named Father of Upper Peru. August 25, the country became Bolivia as we call it today in honor of the Liberator and his great contributions to the country.

Cuadillos and Oligarchic Rule

In 1854 Justo Jos de Urquisa became the new caudillo. Buenos Aires and Urquisa forces went into conflict. After defeating Urquisa Buenos Aires becomes the national capital of Argentina. The government welcomed European immigrants to the Pampas; which were divided into 3 estates (estancias). Gauchos worked on the land and railroads while any leftover American Indians were taken to Patagonia and exterminated. Traditional farming methods such as rounding up wild livestock and taking it to the market, were replaced with modern methods like ranching cattle, sheep and goats.

Cuadillos from the landowning Creole families removed each other at a fast pace. Between 1830 through 1899, there were approximately 41 presidencies and 30 insurrections. Not much was done and a large portion of the money from foreigners went to the leaders. Rivalries kept being refueled mainly because of failure to agree on federalism or tighter control.

Mexico's Independence from Spain

Father Miguel Hidalgo wants to lead a land reform movement; he calls for the Indians to rebel. Planning to lead a group to Mexico City, much to his surprise he is captured and executed. His body is left in the middle of the street to warn other attackers to think twice and go back to where they came from. During this time things are spiraling out of control throughout Latin America. Napoleon loses in Europe, a civil war breaks out in Spain, a dispute going on in Haiti, and Jose de San Martin & Simon Bolivar are rebelling against the Spanish in Argentina.

Two prominent individuals Vicente Guerrero and Agust­n de Iturbide came up with a solution called the Iguala Plan. The plan was based on civil rights between Mexicans and peninsulares, reverence for the church and groundwork for independence. By 1820 Augustin de Iturbide declares Mexico independent from Spain. The Spanish monarchy has no more say so in Mexico. However, the poor people are back at square one; Mexican or Spanish nobles are still there. No benefits were seen for the poor people in the Haitian and Mexican Revolutions.

The Portuguese monarchy fled from Napoleon and made Rio de Janero the nation capital in 1807. Brazil is the new home of the Portuguese crown, establishing a Portuguese kingdom. A couple years later the people change their mind and want to be their own democratic independent republic. Of course, this was determined on the condition that the Portuguese kept their power, title and wealth.

Latin America At The End of The Revolutions for Independence: Territory

At the end of the wars the new states had been established: Mexico and the United Provinces of Central America, Viceroyalty of New Spain; Great Columbia, territory of New Granada (Columbia, Venezuela and Ecuador); Peru, Chile, and Bolivia, Viceroyalty of Peru; and the United Provinces of the River Plata and Paraguay made from the Viceroyalty of La Plata.

Political Effects

The Creoles were very seldom given the opportunity to exercise their political rights. Part of the problem was that a large majority of the people were illiterate and miniscule with anything that had to do with the government. By no means were they ever prepared to one day have to make decisions for themselves and govern their own people. For years they became comfortable with being obedient to the Spanish who told them everything to do. Now they were fearful when faced with responsibility. The election of executive officers was usually granted to men who were well put together and veterans from the war. Sadly, these men had nothing to bring to the table because they were clueless on political theory. As they tried to create an effective government they turned back to military experience since they were conditioned again to receiving orders from someone else. A government where peace and harmony coexisted was simply not obtainable for the creoles. Tensions were rising between them and the Mestizos because of racial antagonism. Violence proved to be the only method that got through to people.

Social Effects

Nothing changed in the social class except the creoles replacing peninsulares at the top. Everyone else was still at the bottom. All revolutions began with a popular power base from the middle to lower class; they fueled the revolutions. Going back to what Aristotle said he who controls the middle-class wins is proved to be true. Nations felt that they should be defined not by ancient dynasties but by their own actions. The United States become a democracy for the first time since Republican Rome.

Economic Effects

Before the wars manufacturing was not encouraged due to the fact that authorities did not want competition with the mother country. Following the revolution mineral and agricultural production declined, and industrialization took its place. Trade was no longer limited to Spain so the United States and Great Britain became the new countries' trading partner. America was the primary source for exporting cash crops and other raw materials; manufactured goods were imported too. Once the Spaniards were driven out the government annexed their lands and immediately put them up for sale. The ironic part was the creoles were the only ones who could afford the land; yet they were still frowned upon by the rest of society because of their distinction.

Labor and Immigrants

Latin America's population saw a drastic increase during the 18th century. Labor was in high demand still because the land-person ration did not change. One of the most notable solutions was the introduction of forced labor; specifically designed for American Indians in the Andes. Slavery was a direct correlation to forced labor and begun making its debut among different regions. Wages were unacceptably low because of Mine operators and landowners who controlled all wealth distribution. The government decided it was necessary to engage in a selective mass immigration to assist with labor shortages. Common immigrants consisted of indentured laborers recruited from India and China (coolies). They were on 5 to 10 year contracts working off the coasts. Peru, Cuba and Costa Rica hosted 235,000 Chinese immigrants; who were placed to work on sugar and cotton plantations, railroads and silver mines.

Conclusion

Looking at the Latin American Revolution from one perspective an individual could say it was a good thing it happened. The South American countries became independent. If they had not the United States would not have many of the imports Americans love. Machinery, motor vehicles, chemicals, metals, plastic and plenty others. On the other hand, someone could also say it did not help and the world would have been better without it. Most of the countries had to work hard to rebuild their tarnished political and economic foundations.

Bibliography

https://www.britannica.com/place/Latin-America/The-independence-of-Latin-America
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/latin-american-independence-creoles
Latin American History by A. Curtis Wilgus
Makers of Democracy in Latin America by Harold E. Davis

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Latin American Revolution. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The British Eventually Prevailed in the War

It would be agreed that for the British Colonists, the year of 1763 was seen as a great watershed in American History. On that note, throughout the years of 1756-1763, was a time period of salutary neglect that lead to the French and Indian war, in which the British called it the Seven Years War. At first it began as a local war in North America battled by the Colonists against the coalition of the French and Indians, however it became a global international war. The war in North America was led and coordinated by British regulars with the help of frontier local armies.

The British eventually prevailed in the war. In that equivalent year, the Peace of Paris made an overall domain for the British, where the French transferred Canada to the British. Which additionally prompt the French, surrendering their cases to the Louisiana domain to the Spanish. Alongside, the Colonists had built up their very own self-ruling authoritative bodies which they accepted had indistinguishable power from Parliament. They gladly considered themselves having every one of the privileges of any Englishmen and expanding the British empire, they were proud of being governed by the British. Be that as it may, after 1763 salutary neglect came to an end acquiring enormous debt where they perceived the need to revamp their colonies.

In 1765, every colonist was insulted by the inconvenience of the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act was unambiguously an expense where each bit of paper was to hold up under a stamp sold by British operators. The tax was proposed to pay for British soldiers to be positioned in the settlements. It was guaranteed that the troops were there to ensure the homesteaders however as a general rule they were there to prevent the colonists from taking more Indian land. the colonists at that point requested "No Taxation without Representation".

Casual reactions, fundamentally from the lower and mediocre sorts led to; road showings, mob protest, the boycott of British imports, and the sons of liberty composed the mass activity. Notwithstanding, the Stamp Act was never actualized, and was revoked in 1766. Concurrent with cancellation of the Stamp Act the "Declaratory Act" was reported.

The American Revolution was predicated by various thoughts and occasions that, joined, prompted a political and social partition of frontier belonging from the home country and a blending of those previous individual states into a free country. A rousing power behind the unrest was the American grasp of a political ideology called republicanism, which was predominant in the settlements by 1775. Republicans required free men to stay watchful in order to withhold the duties and responsibilities of the citizens. They believed that only the independence such as landowners, were entitled in acting of public good.

Devotees to republicanism suspected that self-intrigued men could endeavor to extend any power they had. Another ideological factor that led to the American Revolution was called Liberalism, where the legislatures were framed to secure property rights. At the point when the state bombed in its obligation, citizens held the privilege to upset and were committed to act. With that, the colonists in the South dreaded slave rebellions and were certain the British would not ensure slave proprietors.

The British additionally neglected to secure the individuals who needed to settle and suitable Indian land. The majestic government meddled with dealers and exchange. Colonies weren't accustomed to being governed along these lines; they had been self overseeing, so they were angry. Colonists saw indications of intrigues against their freedom, for example; new taxes, standing armed force, expanding number of put men, infringements on frontier courts, and plural office holding. This makes colonists feel alienated from the British; they couldn't consider themselves to be resembling thee ruthless men they saw.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The British Eventually Prevailed In The War. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

How other Facts Lead British

During the 18th century, Britain was being in a very strong time. Their industry and technology developed rapidly, which helped their military to expand. Especially the navy, at that time, the advanced technology helps the British navy became the most powerful army in the whole world. As well as they also have a lot of colonies separate in the whole world, the support from outside source helped Britain develop. During that time American just a one of the British colony. their army cannot compare with the British army, and in most time they were protected by redcoat.

And because they were the colony, their policy and social and economy trade were controlled by Britain. Therefore, the American actually didn't have power to against with British. However, the result of the American Revolution was beyond expectation. Even American without the help of France, between the British leaders, lacked unity and the right strategy, which reduced their military power. During that time the British force power was also influenced by chaos within the military. Plus they haven't enough support in the colonies. Those facts also lead the British fail in the American revolutionary war.

First, British believe that their forces can defeat any force in the world, and they have the right to believe that, but during the war, it makes their commanders often over-relax and leads their leader lacked unity and the right strategy, and make them belittle the enemy. John M. Taylor mentioned that " University of Virginia historian Andrew O'Shaughnessy, after examining the factors that led to Britain's defeat, he comes up with no single scapegoat. Britain's defeat was a team effort"(1..).

The bad attitudes lead British commanders lost their victory. The battle of Yorktown is the best example to show British poor solidarity. Rachel McBrayer' article record that during the battle of Yorktown "Cornwallis lost a quarter of his army in the battle, leading him to abandon the backcountry of the Carolinas and move his army to Wilmington on the North Carolina coast to resupply and rest his troops. Cornwallis's unsanctioned decision to then march his army to Yorktown, Virginia, effectively hastened the end of the British Southern Strategy" (2..). This battle during the American Revolution was important and it can directly influence the result of the American Revolutionary War. But from this battles, it obviously shows that the British did not skillfully change their plans. The leader also didn't have a good communication to design proper strategies.

Cornwallis should communicate with other British generals when he made a plan. If they didn't have a comprehensive strategy, everything will be messed up. So, even their equipment and army are better than American force, but the fail group effort produced the bad strategies and ultimately lead British fail in the revolutionary war. Second, the power of British force was influenced by chaos within the military. During that time, Even the British has the most powerful military in the world, but their soldiers are chaotic and leader has corruption. So, during the war, the British army always with a terrible morale.

First, The vulgarity of British soldiers came from that British allowed the informal soldier to join the army. Berkshire told a government minister that he held men condemned for highway robbery and horse stealing, but who were "exceedingly proper fellows for either the Land or the Sea Service"(3..). Then the bad moral of official corruption, for example, officers were not entitled to free rations while in garrison, but many made arrangements with the commissary agents to provide them, their families, and their friends with free food.(4..). There has recorded that "Americans had been scandalized by the vulgarity of British soldiers, and they came to believe that 'success in the war depended on their individual moral character and that of their new nation' " (5..).

The information proved that informal soldiers and corrupt officers had always existed and they had led to poor morale in the British army. Moreover, informal soldiers are less loyal than formal soldiers, and corrupt officials may make British soldiers uneasy, which lead a decline in soldiers' loyalty to officers. If a state's armed forces do not have a good morale, their military quality will decline, also the teamwork will be affected. According to the American thought ( the British soldiers did not have a good morality)at that time, if Britain continued to develop in this way, Britain could not succeed in the war.

During the American Revolution, the British haven't enough support from the colonies. First is the British refuse the support from royalists in colonies. And British military leader did not trust the royalists and preferred to rely on its own army. O'Shaughnessy indicates that the politicians and generals refused to make Loyalists equal participants in the war, insisting that American officers be subordinate to Britons of the same rank. (6..). Second is the tax policy has reduced American support for Britain, for example, the stamp tax, it has impacted all Americans, but in particular, it was taken as an offense by the merchants and lawyers; it angered everyone.

Thereafter, riots broke out in several states(7..). The stamp tax dissatisfied the American. Those people who were oppressed by British unfair policy will not support the British anymore. British failed to utilize the Royalists of the whole colony because British did not fully trust them and they preferred to rely on their own troops. This reduces pressure of Royalist for Patriots. Then, due to British army lost their support in American, they will have more difficulty during the war. And the colonies were so vast. If the British did not have enough support from Royalists and American colonists, they will haven't enough manpower to allow them to control the expansion of the Patriots and win any battle In conclusion, the British military surely has some problem during the American revolutionary war, and those problems affect the British force power.

It is also clear that their leaders have not good unity and they didn't devise the tactics to suit them during the battle. Informal soldiers and corrupt officers led to moral chaos in the British army. The British also failed to utilize the Royalists of the whole colony and they have less support in America. According to those facts, the lack of solidarity, lack of moral and lack of support all impact the victory of Britain.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

How Other Facts Lead British. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Story about Tattooed Woman

The Tattooed Face Woman

Imagine getting your whole face tattooed by thorns. Would you bear the amount of pain? Well, Yin Yin, a Burmese Chin woman, tattooed her entire face by thorns so she would be ugly. I decided to interview her since I was always curious as to why she tattooed her face. She wanted to destroy her beauty so she wouldn't be harmed or got sold. Yin Yin is a seventy-year-old woman that is a friend of my mom. When I interviewed her, her story astonished me as to why she decided to tattoo her face. Yin has lived with the tattooed on her face since the age of nine. She firmly believes tattooing her face saved her life. Chin State is located along the borders of Myanmar. The history of Chin tribes tattooing their faces began generations ago, and it was for a good cause.

To start my interviewed, I asked Yin why she and the other women tattooed their faces.It was normal for us to get tattooed when we were at the age of nine or ten years old. It was a tradition that we wanted to keep, Yin replied. There must be a reason or history behind tattooing your faces, I continued.

Oh yes, a long time ago, the royal family came to our village, and the young prince fell in love with one of the prettiest girls in the tribe. The prince by force took her to marry her since then Royals would annually come and prey on beautiful young girls from our tribe to marry as tokens. To protect their daughters, the parents decided to tattoo their young daughters so their beauty wouldn't show. Ultimately, the parents were sad to make their daughters appear, ugly but they did not want to lose them either. Slowly, I studied her face and all the different lines, shapes that looked like spider webs and ovals. It was fascinating to see a person that had so many detailed tattoos that were on her face. I couldn't imagine the amount of pain that she had to go through with it.

We moved to a different room filled with old photographs. There were many pictures of Yin when she was a little girl. She looked beautiful and graceful. Do you regret getting tattooed I asked?

I used to regret it when I was in my teen years, but now I come to appreciate it. I may look different now, but that doesn't mean I'm not beautiful, my face is a masterpiece of art, she exclaimed. How long did it take to tattoo your face, I asked her.

It took a day to complete the whole process, and it was excruciating, mostly around the eye area, she replied within a sorrow voice. What are the ingredients used to make the ink for the tattoo I asked curiously?
We made it from a mixture of cow bile, soot, plants, and pig's fat, She answered. After all the ingredients gathered, they take thorns or pine needles that has durability, dipped it in ink and hammered slowly through their faces to make designs. Different tribes in the region got different designs to distinguish themselves from other tribes. How long was your recovery I questioned?

Not very fast, it took me two weeks to be able to move my face and to speak again properly, she said laughing.
Living in America, I feel like I am popular, she joked. She explained to me the different types of looks she gets when she goes to public places. How do you feel when you are around people I asked.
Sometimes people tend to stare a lot, I don't mind it, but it can get annoying, she said. Do you ever think of removing it I asked?

No, never. I will not remove anything because it defines who I am as a person and my background. It's too historical to remove this now, she replied with a smile.

Even though tattooing their faces might have started it because of a tragedy. Now it's considered as art, and it's incredible and captivating. The tradition is slowly dying out now due to villagers moving into bigger cities and are exposed to city life. Many Chin teenagers are against tattooing their faces now along with the Burmese government. They believe the world is evolving and changing every day. Even though Yin Yin likes the tattooing, she doesn't want young people to feel obligated to get them. We should appreciate Yin Yin and the last of the face tattooed women because after them there will be none left.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A Story About Tattooed Woman. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The American Revolution’s Revolutionary Effects

After the American Revolution there was a slow change occuring in the new nation. New ideas in the minds of citizens. Views on women and slaves were changing mostly for the better. New state constitutions allowing new rights. Freedom of religion being brought to the nation at last. Although many things had stayed the same at the time, the changes were very much significant and lead to further change in our future.

After the Revolution former colonists, now citizens of the United States, begun to have new ideas of living. In 1786 Thomas Jefferson wrote the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. This called for a wall of separation between church and state. His words changed views on slavery mostly in the north. The change of social classes was a major change as well. It abolished titles of nobility and inheritance to the first born son. Voting became easier because most requirements were taken away or lessened. Although women were still not allowed this right. Change toward a free labor system helped the laws of slavery to be changed.

The Revolution changed the way women lived and were raised. Of course they were still treated relatively the same, there was an idea called Republican Motherhood. This idea lead women to being able to have more opportunities for education. This was created to allow women, who mostly stayed at home in the period to take care of their kids, to teach their children republican values. The idea was popular among many and caused an increase in women authors and texts made for women. It also created feminism to surge with writings such as On The Equality of The Sexes, written by Judith Sargent Murray. It had also shown women the importance of political culture.

As for slaves it took a while for any major change in the way they were viewed and treated. Although the hypocrisies of Thomas Jefferson were well known, his ideas of liberty sparked by his words of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that all men are created equal,changed many citizens views. There had also been a decline in apprenticeships and indentured servitudes. There was a split between the north and south on their views of slavery. The abolishment of slavery was tedious. Between 1777 and 1804 all northern states had finally ridden themselves of slavery. Yet in the south after some decline it was brought back after the invention of the cotton gin in 1793.

Although many things had stayed the same at the time, the revolution was very much revolutionary. Not as much as it could have been but everything takes time. Slowly it changed for women and african americans, but we still sometimes see a struggle in those areas in our present time and place. Of course we don't need a war to change it, we just need people who can influence the way people view each other in a positive light. Eventually and hopefully we will finally see a world full of love, a world where everyone is equal.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The American Revolution's Revolutionary Effects. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Polynesian Tradition of Tattooing

Used in the past and now the present, it causes a great deal of pain, it takes time, but in the end, it is all worth it. This is, Polynesian Tattooing. According to PBS, The actual tradition of Polynesian Tattooing existed more than 2000 years ago. This is not your typical tattooing process. It can take months to complete the process and the pain is excruciating. Polynesian tattooing is sacred on the islands of Maori, Hawaii, Tahiti, Samoa, and Tonga. These tattoos are about being proud of your heritage. Ancient Polynesian Tattooing reflects tribe, family, and land. Despite the pain this process causes, Polynesians went through it as a way to honor the culture that they love so dearly, and modern Polynesians are now readopting the practices.

A tattoo parlor in New Zealand discusses the origins of tattoo art in Polynesia, in addition to other historic information, such as, the origins of Polynesian societies, Tonga and Samoa, tools of the trade, the healing process, and placement on the body. In order to express their character and identity, Polynesians used tattoo art. In fact, These tattoos were full of distinctive signs, often indicating status in a hierarchical society as well as sexual maturity, genealogy, and one's rank within the society. Nearly everyone in ancient Polynesian society was tattooed. In Tonga and Samoa, Polynesian tattoos developed into a highly refined art (Polynesian Tattoo). For the Tongan people, tattoo art was extremely significant to them both socially and culturally. Additionally, in Ancient Samoa, tattooing was remarkable in terms of warfare and religious rituals. The healing process for these tattoos took almost a year. In the meantime, friends and family would have to assist the process because basic activities, such as sitting or walking, could be extremely painful. Lastly, the placement of the tattoo was very important. For instance, tattooing the head is related to themes such as, spirituality, knowledge, wisdom and intuition (Polynesian Tattoo). On the other hand, if one were to tattoo their lower arms and hands, they are showing creativity, creation, and making things (Polynesian Tattoo).

Samoan Tattooing, along with the other Polynesian cultures, is an agonizing experience. Rite of passage caused men to undergo inking over a three or fourth month period. Then, the man's family threw a party to celebrate the completion of his pe'a, or tattoo, that stretched from mid-torso to the knees, and the tattoo master shattered a water vessel at his feet to signify that the agonizing experience had come to an end (DeHart). Then came the healing process. The tattoo would take up to a year to heal, whereas nowadays, it takes seven to 14 days (Quora). Imagine this scenario in real society. I believe that the desire to get a tattoo would be much less if in today's world, tattooing took up to a year to heal. People probably look forward to the fact that the pain will be over in as little as a week. In addition, the ordeal was so severe that death by infection was a legitimate concern (DeHart). Most men completed the process due to social pressure. However, those who surrendered to the acute pain of tattooing were viewed upon as weak and faced humiliation among many. In addition, In ancient Polynesia, tattooing was fraught with taboos, steeped in social status, and imbued with deeply spiritual beliefs (DeHart). If this were very popular in my culture, I would most likely get tattooed because I would know how much this tradition means to my family, and I want to understand and appreciate the importance of it.

In the article "CULTURE LEAVES ITS MARK // CULTURE: Tattoos Help Keep Samoan Island Customs Alive among the Young in Orange County," Rosalva Hernandez introduces Samoan Misiaiti Togagae who reveals that he got tattoos because of the love he has for his culture and his people. I am proud to be Samoan, he says. Despite the pain, specifically the razor-sharp needles of a boar tusk comb into a pot of inky blue fluid that would agonize his body, Togagae got these tattoos to pay respect to his culture. In addition, among some Samoan youths who have grown up far from their native island, the tattoos have become a fad, much like tinted shades and skimpy shorts (Hernandez). He says that you must have the courage to do this. In particular, because of the pain it causes, like it did to Togagae, as he nearly bolted off the floor during his tattoo procedure. Similar to what Zealand Tattoo said, a custom for hundreds of years, the 'tatau'from which the English word tattoo is derived can symbolize a clan's rank in Samoan society or a particular family's background, or merely a design chosen by the tattoo artist (Hernandez). Samoans are very designated to their culture as you can see with the pain they must go through to endure this procedure.

Similarly, Maori Tattooing is where purpose and applications are sacred. In Maori Tattoos about Culture by Jared Nicoll, Ta Moko tattoo artist named Jackson Skipper tells what it is like to travel the country designing and drawing Ta Moko. The meaning of Ta Moko is Maori Tattooing. Ta Moko was like a history of a person's achievements and represented their status in their tribe. It was like a resume. It also served as a reminder to people about their responsibility in life (Australian Museum). As stated by Ta Moko artist Jackson Skipper, People need to understand traditional Maori tattooing is about being proud of your heritage, not glorifying gangs. Skipper was known to even have tattooed members of his own family, including his cousin Daniel Skipper, who he tattooed in a tent on family land in Waikawa (Australian Museum). Jackson skipper adds It's about being proud of your heritage. Over the last couple of years, Jackson Skipper has developed several tattoo designs, each reflecting each person's Iwi [tribe], their connection to the land, and their Whanau [family] (Australian Museum). In addition, Daniel Skipper says "We feel good about doing it, good about getting it done, especially for the Whanau. In other words, he feels accomplished when getting a tattoo because he feels as if he's doing it for his family.

Tahitian Tattooing was also a critical part of one's belonging to this culture. A source from a tattoo parlor in French Polynesia specifically describes the history of Polynesian Tattooing in Tahiti. The origin of the English word ?tattoo' actually comes from the Tahitian word ?tatau' and goes back as far as 1500 BC (POLYNESIAN TATTOO). Almost everyone was tattooed in ancient Polynesian society. It was a fundamental part of ancient Tahitian culture. Tattooing indicated ones genealogy and/or rank in society. It was a sign of wealth, of strength, and of the ability to endure pain (POLYNESIAN TATTOO). It takes two people to do the tattooing, one does the stretching of the skin and the other does the inking.

All symbols in Tahitian tattoos are based on the 4 elements: ocean, earth, wind, fire. For each symbol, there is a sacred ceremony. A few commonly incorporated symbols include: turtle=fertility, dolphin=wisdom, tiki=protection. There were symbols specific to certain families and symbols unique to various roles. For example, the tattoos of warriors would incorporate symbols different than those of fishermen. Each symbol takes on personal meaning. There are symbols that represent the sea and symbols of the land, stability, travel etc. (POLYNESIAN TATTOO)
These symbols were key in tattooing because they were specific to the culture and each person wanted to make sure they represented their home land.

Tattooing in Tahiti is an act of sharing time and space among tattooists, tattooed people, and observers (Thomas et al). When Tahitians get tattooed, they often perceive the bodies of others and differentiate their tattoo art. In fact, when doing this, they identify uniformities and distinctions, and include and exclude each other according to the representation, experience, and social contexts of the tattooed body. Tattooing, as body inscription, is thus the embodiment and representation of identities and relationships resulting from the objectification of one's own body, and others', in a shared time and space (Thomas et al).

Tattooing in the Tahitian culture is a process of establishing cultural, gender, occupational and age identities for young Tahitian tattooists and tattooed people. This is a different process from that which occurs when the knowledge of tattooing is ?heritage', passed from the elder people to the younger (Thomas et al). Due to a sporadic history of Tahitian tattooing, both people who are tattooed and young tattooists have been investigating and developing new forms of tattoos and skills both in and outside of Tahiti. The notion of ?tradition' is, however, still significant since it boosts the social value of tattooing (Thomas et al).

Tonga in particular has a long and complicated relationship to its traditional tattoos that have only begun to re-emerge as popular designs in the last 20 years (Ding). When it comes to Pacific Island cultures, tattooing has always been a central custom, and designs were commonly used to represent one's role within their community as well as a person's identity. In addition, The Tongan name for its tattooing tradition is Tatatau. While designs were certainly influenced by other Pacific cultures, they incorporated their own distinct patterns and meanings over the years in which they flourished (Ding). Although designs seemed to be alike in many ways, each tattoo for each person is unique and customized to the person. For men, Tongan tattoos are commonly placed from the torso to the knees. On the other hand, Tongan tattoos for women are composed of symmetrical lines across the thighs. Authentic tattoos are created using the traditional tools (made of bone and turtle shell) and designs are based on traditional markings. As several artists apprentice under current masters of the tradition as well as increased interest in the tradition evidenced by Tongans, this tradition looks like one that will endure (Ding).

In January 1778, Captain James Cook decided to sail to the Hawaiian islands a decade after visiting New Zealand. When he arrived, he was anchored off the coast of the island of Kaua'i. On the shore, there were Polynesians who had been living here for over a thousand years. When James Cook arrived, they greeted him with surprising admiration. Their society, like all Polynesia, was governed by a strict kapu, or taboos, that regulated every aspect of their behavior (PBS). They dutifully worshiped a multitude of deities (gods), including Lono, the god of peace and agriculture. The people Cook encountered may have mistaken him for the physical embodiment of Lono since his ship's masts and sails resembled the emblem of the god (PBS). Although cook left Hawaii and sailed toward North America, he had set the standards for the future of the Hawaiian people.

Like other Polynesians, the Hawaiian people imported their traditional tattoo art, known as kakau, to the islands (PBS). It assisted them not only for decoration and differentiation, but also to guard their health and spiritual well-being (PBS). Hawaiian tattoos often mimics natural forms. Images of lizards, which were greatly respected and feared, and of the Hawaiian crescent fan (Peahi niu) for the highest-ranking members of society, dominated Hawaiian kakau. Intricate patterns, mimicking woven reeds or other natural forms, graced men's arms, legs, torso and face. Women were generally tattooed on the hand, fingers, wrists and sometimes on their tongue (PBS).

The designs were applied by specially trained kahuna, experts in one or more critical tasks, who applied pigment to the skin with a needle made from bone, tied to a stick and struck by a mallet. Traditional designs varied widely, according to available records, but many memorialized fallen chiefs, leaders or family members (PBS). According to the dictates of kapu, the tattooing shielded with extreme confidentiality, and all tools and evidence were thrown out after use. This shows how sacred Hawaiians took tattooing in their culture.

Although popular belief is that Polynesian tattooing was only used in the past, it is indeed used in the present, as seen with Tongan Tattooing. Tattooing for Tongans has been revived to the current day. While many artists and Tongans were interested in the tradition of Tongan tribal tattoos, there seemed to be very little information about this ancient craft. It was not until early 2002 that work began in trying to revive this art form. Specialist tattoo artist Su'a Sulu'ape Alaiva'a who was well versed in Pacific tattooing, met with several Tongans in Hawaii with the purpose of looking into Tongan tattooing practices (Ding). Fairly soon after this meeting, two Tongans obtained the first traditional tattoos of their ancestors. These tattoos even received a traditional blessing to commemorate the occasion. Within a year, two more Tongans had received tattoos and tattooist Aisea Toetu'u committed himself to being the first artist to specialize in specifically Tongan designs, ensuring that the tradition would endure (Ding).

In comparison, a very famous man known as Dwayne Johnson, also known as The Rock, a producer, an American actor, and semi-retired professional wrestler, has a tattoo relating back to a Polynesian culture, Samoa. You might know him from movies, such as Baywatch, The Game Plan, or Skyscraper. Johnson has a big tattoo covering his upper left breast area and left shoulder. In a YouTube video, he describes the reasoning for his choices. He starts out by saying The story of my tattoo is a very elaborate story that of all the things I love and that I'm passionate about and that move me from the heart. He talked to his tattoo artist for hours before the work was even started and then said a prayer before the process began. In total, it took 60 hours of work, three sessions, at 20 hours a piece. He tells us that it's a story about his life and his journey. However, he says that bigger than him, his life, and his journey, are his ancestors and his culture on his Dad's side, Mom's side, his black culture, and his Samoan culture as well. He believes all the things that are important to him from his family and protecting his family, his ancestors, protecting all of us, the spirit of his ancestors. It represents great struggle and overcoming that great struggle, being appreciative of my success as we come up here to the sunshine and the sunlight that's on my neck. He concludes the video by stating As detailed and elaborate as this entire tattoo is that I'm very proud of, it all comes down to three things, which is my family, and protecting my family, and having a very aggressive warrior spirit that you can't hold down and I will continue to fight and overcome, and that particular piece is over my heart. By this, we can see that Samoan Tattooing is still used in today's world.

Tattooing was used in ancient Polynesian societies, such as Maori, Tahiti, Samoa, Tonga, and Hawaii for many different reasons. Although many tattoos may contain similar designs, they are each different, representing different stories behind them. Tattooing was used in Maori to reflect a person's tribe, land, and family. In addition, Tahitians did it to show signs of wealth, strength, and ability to endure pain (POLYNESIAN TATTOO). Samoans got these tattoos to show the love and respect they have for their culture and their people. Tongans used these tattoos to mark a person's identity and role within their community (Ding). Lastly, Hawaiians got tattooed to guard their health and spiritual well-being (PBS). These here are single reasons for each culture, so imagine how many more can differentiate the meaning behind these tattoos. There is so much more behind these tattoos than just a couple of designs. Despite the pain this process causes, Polynesians went through it as a way to honor the culture that they love so dearly, and modern Polynesians, such as The Rock in addition to many Tongans, are now readopting the practices.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Polynesian Tradition Of Tattooing. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Colonel Thaddeus Kosciusko

In 1763 the Great britain spent 60 Million dollars on the colonies to protect then from the French.So the Great Britain asked for some money cause they were in depth and the colonies said no. The Great Britain was not very happy so they taxed them.In 1764 the Great Britain started something called the sugar act forcing the colonists to import sugar exclusively from the British and to pay things for them.Then one year later they made the extremely bad Stamp act and it was not cool.

They stamped every paper someone bought. The whole thing actually messed up there business and a couple years later they stopped the stamp act.But in 1766 the British started something called the Declaratory act.After in 1767 they started something called the townshend acts.They stamped everything.Once again the americans raided the British goods and they had to quit .They stopped taxing everything but tea.Then they sent 1000 troops to boston to take over and made the colonists pay for them.

Saratoga is short for two battles that handed the grace to the British invasion from Canada during the War. After takeing Fort ticonderoga with almost beat the British army led by way to confident general John Burgoyne walked south at a sloth speed , giving the Americans time to get back to gether under Horatio Gates.

To help him leader george washington sent benedict donald his great commander Colonel Daniel Morgan and his regiment of virginia shooting group and 2 of contents from the Hudson High lands . They brought up the strong Gates strong to about sixty five hundred troops .

Same important was Colonel Thaddeus Kosciusko the 19 British General John Burgoyne achieved a small but important victory over American armys led by Horatio Gates and Benedict Arnold. Though his troop strength had been weakened. Burgoyne again went for the Americans at Bemis Heights on October 7th, but this time was beat and forced to give up.

The constitution of the United States of America is signed by 38 out of only 41 present at the conclusion of the Constitutionin Phili people of the document waged a hardwon fight to win by the only necessary 9 out of 13 american states.Of course after the war they still had some problems but the war was done and we had independence.The constition is held in washington till this day.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Colonel Thaddeus Kosciusko. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

An Eventful Time in American History

An eventful time in American History, full of pride, bloodshed, self-realization, and building of an independent nation. A nation that was fought for and built, creating things, the very things that make America the great country it is today. A rebellion that would change the world, in a matter of nearly a decade of unrest and hostility. The rejection of British Parliament's authority due to taxation, rising prices of many things needed to sustain life under British rule. A prideful nation would be fought for, organized, and built with independence and freedom in mind.

The revolution was in the minds of the people, and in the union of colonies, both of which were accomplished before hostilities commenced (Schlesinger). Tensions were high between the people of the thirteen colonies and the British authorities leading up to the revolution. Leading up to the cry for independence. Over half of the population were young adults. Sixty percent were under the age of 21 and many were children. This meaning many who fought the British for independence were young men.

Life in the Thirteen Colonies would change after Parliament's first of many serious attempts as using government authority over its population. British Parliament would begin a series of attempts to control and gain revenue from the American People. The Stamp Act bill was passed on February 17, 1965 and approved by the Lords on March 8th. The king would then order in to be in effect just two weeks later. This imposed tax was both damaging to the people and opened the door to a revolt. Forcing the population to pay for Great Britain's debt for the Seven Years' War that had grown to 129,586,789 pounds.

This debt was occurred due to the high cost of Great Britain's troops in America. This taxation was a violation of the American people's rights. Creating an atmosphere of hostility and rebellion. A year later British parliament repealed the stamp act. However, the Declaratory act was enacted. This act stated, full power and authority to make laws and statues to bind the colonies and people of America in cases whatsoever. An act that would only fuel the fire burning among the people.

Each event leading up to the rebellion would raise the tension higher. On March 5, 1770 in Boston a volley of gunfire erupted from very unwelcomed British troops, anger and tempers would reach an all time high. A riot of about fifty citizens would erupt and an attack on a British Sentinel would conclude with 3 dead and 8 others wounded. Gunfire would silence the mob only after it was too late. Two British soldiers would be found guilty of manslaughter. Forcing the Royal governor to evacuate the troops from Boston. Boston would have yet another event that would bring unrest.

In 1773, The Tea Act would be enacted. In attempt to receive tax payment, cheaper priced tea would be sold with the intent of a higher tax. The attempt at tax payment would explode, Lord North's new tea monopoly plan would only bring more rebellion. Ships carrying tea to colonial ports would be met with threats of violence. In turn, these ships would often reroute back to their departed ports. The Boston Tea Party would be one of the major events most would remember from history lessons. Unidentifiable colonials would bombard ships in Boston Harbor Port on a cold December night. Dumping 342 chests of tea in the Boston Harbor. In rebellion these unidentifiable people, disguised as Native Americans would never be caught. Causing over three quarters of a million dollars of profit loss. These acts of rebellion were the beginning of the fight for independence and liberty.

At Carpenter's Hall in Philadelphia the First Continental Congress met from September 5th to October 26th, 1774. This meeting would be to consider the options for economic boycott of British trade. The Declaration and Resolves would be agreed upon. The Articles of Association would state that Americans were being treated unfairly by being oppressed by high taxation. They prohibited import, consumption, and export of goods with England.

Eventually in 1775 the Revolutionary War would commence. With many major, bloody, and fierce battles fought for independence. A clashing battle of arms, Lexington and Concord would be the first major battle changing the conflict from politics and social unrest to open warfare (Hagist). From a steep hilltop the battle of Bunker Hill would stun the British troops as they were threatened from above. Ammunition would run low, hand to hand combat would be the only means of fight left. British Troops though taking many casualties would take the hill.

George Washington a war veteran himself would arrive in Cambridge, Massachusetts, becoming the highest command of the new American Army (history.org). Organization of the Army would be the key to possible victory in the War. Bunker Hill signaled an organized rebellion to the King who eventually issue a Proclamation of Rebellion. British General Howe also began organizing a plan of action of his own. "There are many inhabitants in every province well affected to Government, from whom no doubt we shall have assistance, (history.org)" The British Generals plan to call for loyalists did not go as planned.

The Battle of Quebec in December of 1775 was an attempt for American forces to capture the City of Quebec. Planning to force British Troops from the province and gain the assistance from French Canadian support. Yet again a retreat occurred after many men were killed, wounded and captured. Extreme weather conditions and frozen ground would work against the American Forces. This would become the first defeat of the Continental Army.

Outnumber the American forces suffered many casualties in The Battle of Long Island on August 27, 1776. With British forces at an overwhelming 20,000 soldiers, George Washington lost almost a quarter of his force. Weather would interfere with battle once again, this time downpours of rain would prevent the British from maneuvering forces. The heavy rain would eventually cause Washington to withdraw quietly, undefeated by British Troops (Joseph). The remainder of Washington's troops would change their strategy for future attacks.

In Trenton, NJ, on December 26, 1776 American troops would claim victory by sweeping the Troops stationed there. The surprise attack on the British Hessians would leave them with many killed, wounded, and a staggering 906 of their initial 1520 troops captured (Joseph). A once demoralized Army that had been plagued with sickness and the inability to adapt to weather conditions reined a victory.

A decisive Victory with assistance from the French gained yet another Victory for American Troops. With combined troops the French and American's had double to amount of force over Britain in The Battle of Yorktown. Being the last major battle of the American Revolutionary War. After a strategic attack by Washington, Lord Cornwallis' troops would surrender on October 17th, 1781, on the 19th British troops officially surrendered.

This opened the door to negotiations between Britain and the United States. This resulted the Treaty of Paris in 1783.
The Treaty of Paris Concluded the long and bloody war. After many unsuccessful battles the American Forces eventually gained victory. Wrongful taxation, unfair treatment and control pushed the American people to violence. After a fierce rebellion and calls for independence from a tyrant government, the American Army had won the final battle. Many lives were lost, and many had been left wounded, the Revolutionary War was necessary for the American people to gain control and begin building a government that centered around liberty and independence. The very things that make America what it still to this day.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

An Eventful Time In American History. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The American Revolution was a War Fought

The American Revolution was a war fought by and for the common-man. The colonies were designed to enrich the British government and to extend their empire into the New World. In 1651, England established the Navigation Acts to enforce trade between England and the colonies. Furthermore, In 1733, they further established the Molasses Act, in an effort to protect against cheaper options sold by the French.

A Historian named, Robert Eldon Brown argues that the Revolution was conservative due to the sheer numbers of the middle-class who for the first time in history had access to financial opportunities and the right to vote, however their desire for the freedom to self-govern went further than a simple ballot and a small plot of land. On the other hand, Alan Taylor explains that for decades after the Revolutionary War there were still conflicts between the classes over land and who should be allowed to have a voice in our society.

The American Revolutionary War was as radical as any other radical movement war because of the reaction to the taxes, trade policies, and restrictions forced on the colonists by an absentee King which eventually then leads to capitalism. First the colonies wanted more democracy than they already had. An example of this would be before the revolution started the average common man could not vote due to them not having enough land required to vote. Secondly, Since the publication of Thomas Paine's Common Sense the colonists were finally beginning to see that Parliament did not have their best interests at heart.

Thirdly, they finally wanted to have the opportunity to establish themselves as a viable entity on the world market and thereby preserve the profits they worked so hard to earn by establishing a form of capitalism.

First the colonies wanted more democracy than they already had. An example of this would be before the revolution started the average common man could not vote due to them not having enough land required to vote. The land acres required to vote in Virginia was 100 acres before the war, after the revolutionary war the land acres was lowered from 100 acres to 50 acres in the state of Virginia, allowing the 21 year old white male property owners to vote. According to History.org before the war the colonists were not allowed to vote for their colonies governors, and state officials.

After the war colonist 21 year old white male citizens could vote for governors, and state officials. The colonists also felt that they were being put into worse conditions caused by the government, particularly with the intolerable acts which disrupted economy and removed nearly all political say from those in Massachusetts. These acts, which were issued as punishment for the Boston Tea Party, restricted trade by closing the port of Boston and put Britain in control of government affairs.

There were no longer elections, Great Britain had the authority to send trials from the colonies to be heard under a British judge, and colonists had to house British soldiers who were there to punish them. These unfair conditions, along with no ability to change them through the political system, led the colonists to resort to more radical action and abandon their more conservative views. They felt they needed more power to control their own government and that meant democracy was the best option. After their recent events it was made obvious that could never happen if major change did not come about.

Since the publication of Thomas Paine's Common Sense the colonists were finally beginning to see that Parliament did not have their best interests at heart. In Paine's 49 page pamphlet he tried to explain the truth about Britain in simple words so that everybody would be able to read it. It was a major success, selling around half a millions copies and it made the colonists realize that they did not like having one ruler who decided everything for them. They wanted self governance and to be able to have a say in things that would affect them. They also felt like they no longer owed an allegiance to the king and therefore they no longer owed him their hard earned taxes and support. Taxation was a key part of what made this a radical movement.

People were not going to keep paying taxes when they did not feel like they were being properly represented. This brought about the popular saying of No taxation without representation. The other factor that made the Revolution radical was the change of people being able to practice whatever religion they want. This comes from the separation of church and state which does not allow the state to push any religion onto the people. When people have the freedom to choose, more people will get involved and become more devout. To have a government elected that have to be responsible to the people and allowed complete religious freedom, was truly a radical change from royalty who had complete unquestionable power.

The colonist had always found ways around the taxes and restrictions. They finally wanted to have the opportunity to establish themselves as a viable entity on the world market and thereby preserve the profits they worked so hard to earn. By doing so they adopted the idea of Jeffersonianism. Jeffersonianism was a liberal vision that offered the leading men an escape from their uncomfortable middle position when it came to the land of conflicts. This escape was a way that promised their complete drive of respectability in the wider worlds' eyes. Jeffersonians' sweeping political triumph helped avert many events. Some of these events being urban rioting, political partnership, and sectional rivalry.

The Jeffersonians' triumph offered men compelling arguments and the liberal social vision made sense to the backcountry's leading men. The leading men identified with the promise to preserve a perfect equitable economy and society, by allowing the free market and voluntary association to allocate wealth, power, and status. As stated in the article, Jeffersonianism sapped resistance by winning over the leading men. The Jeffersonians' message and approach offered the leading men a oath out of the protracted conflicts in a way that preserved their prosperity and their local influence.

In the process of finding it necessary to organize efforts to defend their new freeholds, the settlers defended their version of the American Revolution. In addition to that we see that by defending their land and values, the settlers contributed to the preservations. An inauguration of a more liberal social order that was guided and led by Jeffersonian politicians and was the result of of the settlers resistance.

The colonists initially arrived as subjects to a monarchical empire that spanned the globe. They reevaluated the very establishment of monarchial governance and organized a democratic society that allowed every citizen a say in how this country was run.
During colonial times, the King represented the highest form of power and government (aside from God) but with the changes brought about by the Great Awakening and the Revolution the population began to believe that God favored those who put in the work and would therefore find themselves rewarded appropriately.

No longer did the common man bow down to a wealthy noble. The Revolution was the product of a shift change in loyalty away from monarchy and aristocracy, and into a new form of national government which empowered the common man as opposed to a ruler. Prior to the Revolutionary War citizens were bound to their communities. But Thomas Jefferson presented the idea of a Jeffersonian Democracy which idealized a smaller central government which was centered on democratic views.

He planted the seed that government should play a minor role within the lives of the everyday citizen which contrasted greatly from the heavy regulations of British rule. As you can see the American Revolution was indeed as radical as it gets due to the ideas set forth by individuals who created a form of government that was never seen before in the history of the world. These principles were radical and is a constant reminder to us and the people of the 18th century, that the American society is still so imperfect.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The American Revolution Was A War Fought. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Process of Tattoo Removal

Tattoo Removal

First of all lets talk about Tattoos! What are Tattoos? Tattoo is a form of art which you paint your body with by ink, dyes and pigments. Tattoos are divided into two types, the first one is a Temporary Tattoo that disappears by the times passes and the second and more common one is a indelible Tattoo. Indelible Tattoos are the type that will stay on your body for ever! At least everyone thought that way until few years ago! Well we all make mistakes in life which are sometimes reparable and sometimes irreparable. As you can guess we are going to talk about indelible Tattoos which were impossible to remove until last few years so you never had a freedom to make mistake in choosing the Tattoo but these days it is possible to make mistakes! Yes you can clean your Tattoos out!

Ways of removing Tattoos

Well there are a lot of ways to remove a Tattoo from your body these days but we are going to suggest you Laser Tattoo Removal Method which is much more effective and it almost has no side effects! You get a chance to clean the ink from your body for almost 0% Risk. What could be a better news than this!

How does Laser Tattoo Removal works?

Our body knows the ink as a foreign objects and keeps trying to get rid of it by sending WBCs (White Blood Cells) but ink is too strong for them! But as a result of getting several attacks by WBCs, Tattoos will fade over time. As you can see it is really hard to get the ink under your skin removed. The Ink is very tough and that is the reason of using a very strong technology like Laser Technology to have your Tattoo removed. There are different types of Lasers which different strength level. For example Lasers used for hair removal are too weak for removing a Tattoo ink so using that on a Tattoo is just a big mistake which will waste your time. To remove Tattoos you'll need a specialized type of Lasers called Ultra-Short Pulse. This Laser type is designed to emit very hard blast in short and small areas at each try to destroy the ink. The pigment of it also matters. There are different kinds of Ink used in Tattooing which makes it even harder to remove them. To be able to remove the Tattoos made by different ink types you will need to set the Laser to a different wavelength. The procedure is not ending here! Once the Laser turns ink to small pieces, the WBC will attack and take those small parts away so the liver can flush them out of your body.

How effective is it (The Laser Tattoo Removal)?

It is 99% effective. Almost all of those who have undergone it will be able to get rid of their Tattoos completely. Just like hair removal, Removing a Tattoo is not going to end in only one session. After each session you need a break to give your body few weeks to heal, as we said WBCs need time to carry the Ink away plus your body needs to heal any harm from Laser to your skin.

How many sessions you will need?

Well as we already talked about different kinds of ink its easy to guess that it depends on the type of the Ink your Tattoo artist used but if we are telling an average, the average is to say something between Six to Twelve sessions. Now we are going to talk about few factors which will make it easier to estimate number of the sessions you will need:

Color of the Tattoo

A Tattoo's color is very very effective factor in estimating number of your sessions. You may think dark colored inks are harder than light ones to get rid of but surprisingly light colored Tattoos are going to take more effort than dark ones! Laser is a light anyway, different kind of it but it is a light. As we all know dark colors will absorb more light and heat into themselves so according to this, the darker a Tattoos ink is, the more light and heat (Laser) they will Absorb! On the other hand, light color Tattoos are more reflective that means they will reflect lights (including Laser light) and obviously take more sessions and time. Yellow and Purple inks are the hardest ones to get rid of.

Location of the Tattoo

The next factor is where your tattoo is. The more blood circulates under your skin the sooner your Tattoo gets disappeared! If your Tattoo is for example somewhere on your chest the Tattoo Removal will work in your favor but if its on your wrists or ankles it will be harder to get rid of them so it will need more time and session.

Age of your Tattoo

Tattoos are not disappearing over time but as we explained they get faded. The older your Tattoo is the fewer sessions it takes to be removed.

Few more points about the Ultra-Short Pulse Laser

Lets explain how the Laser destroys the Ink! Imagine we have a Radiation machine and we shine radiation energy on one side of the ink particle. What's going to happen is that it will heat up that side and then the heat transfer System of molecules is going to cause the entire ink particle to heat up. Well what if we had a really really really hot hitting lamb which was very very fast! Obviously the side of the ink which is getting the heat will get hot so quick that the other side wont be able to catch up with it so it will cause a huge internal stress that will rip apart the particle. This is where the Laser differences are important, the faster you can heat a part of the ink the better you can rip apart the ink! Then White Blood Cells are going to get those little ink particles and take them to liver, the ink parts are going to mix up with other poisons in the liver and then they will all be gone by the time you visit John!

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A Process Of Tattoo Removal. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Was the American Revolution Revolutionary

I am leaning more towards the American Revolution being both revolutionary as well as conservative. After the French and Indian war, Britain gained territory in North American, but was also in financial turmoil due to the war. Because of this, Britain began taxing the colonies, tremendously. Taxes, such as the Townshend's Act and the Stamp act were placed upon them, unfairly because the colonists were not allowed representation in regards to their views or oppositions of such issues.

They did not want taxation without representation as Mr. James Otis stated. And at every turn, the British were placing other Acts upon the colonies: The Navigation Act, the Sugar Act, the Quartering Act, and so forth. The colonists basically had to pay for their protection by providing housing to British soldiers, put in place by British Parliament. As stated in our history book America: A Narrative History, What Americans most feared in the late eighteenth century was the governmental abuse of power (pg. 245). And, from what I have learned, they did suffer from governmental abuse.

They were under British rule by their mother country, however they were not treated like British citizens. The colonists revolted, breaking free from Britain. Once the American Revolution was won, the colonists, or rather Americans, no longer had to fear governmental abuse from Britain. America was now her own country, allowing its citizens to follow the the pursuit of happiness which included ideas such as every man is created equal and individuals had an equal opportunity to prosper. It also meant that individuals had freedoms, such as freedom of religion. I believe that this is where the idea of conservative comes into play (though I could very well be wrong in my understanding).

The colonists were already living by their ideas (the previously mentioned) but were being held down by Britain. However, now that America was her own country, the people could now live by these ideas. And a government also needed to be formed. Questions such as who would hold power, what would the relation be between each state as well as to the national government, and what was required of this government in order to see to the success of this now independent nation, needed to be answered (America: A narrative History, pg. 247). And no, lives were not changed overnight, and unfortunately, there were many struggles.

America was facing debt after the war without a stable currency. At first taxes were not in place, but when taxes were eventually put in place to help pay the debt owed by America, the people protested (especially when taxes paid were more than that of when they were under British rule). The Land Ordinance Act of 1786 gave the right to vote, hold office, and write constitutions to adult white males only. The Northwest Ordinance Act of 1787 involved banning slavery north of the Ohio River (except for those that were already enslaved).

This Act also promised that land would not be taken from the Indians, but that promise was broken, many times. Reading Shay's Rebellion, we see that the poor man became even more poor (particularly farmers) when they could not pay the taxes that were imposed on them. So, no, unfortunately powers of positions did not change for many. However, delegates began working on the Constitution and laying out plans for a new government that would include a president, not a king.

References

  • Shi, David Emory, & Tindall, George Brown (2016). America: A Narrative History (10E, Vol I). (page 245).
  • Shi, David Emory, & Tindall, George Brown (2016). America: A Narrative History (10E, Vol I). (page 247).




Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Was The American Revolution Revolutionary. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Tattoo as a Tool for Self-Expression

Johnny Depp once said, My body is my journal, and my tattoos are my story. Many people may agree with Depp's quote while others may not. Tattoos have been frowned upon by employers, parents, and elders. Maybe it's because tattoos used to be a thing for bikers or rockstars, but believe it or not according to a Statiista Survey, four out of 10 U.S adults aged 18-69 have at least one tattoo(2017,p.1). Tattoos are now perceived as more than just ink, they are actually meaning something to people. People use tattoos to express themselves, cover up imperfections, or as a remembrance for someone or something.

A lot of people get tattoos that help to tell who they are or to express their style and opinion through silence. Tattoos are basically a physical display of who people really are on the inside or the kind of person they want others to see/know. For instance, a girl might get a music note over her heart. This tattoo might show the love that the girl has for music or maybe she is just comparing her heart to music. Nobody really knows what the tattoo means except her. She gets to pick what side of her that she wants everybody to see. Tattoos make people be able to celebrate their uniqueness and personal identity.

Scars are seen as imperfections by some people. These scars make people feel uncomfortable so they get tattoos to camouflage these scars to feel stronger and to overcome their past and replace them with something they love. With specifically self-harm scars, people may find it very challenging to move on. For some people, tattoos act as apart of the healing process or as an act of restoring the body (Checkland, 2017). Tattoo artists can turn scars into something beautiful. Putting art over scars can make self-harm victims feel as if they are more than just their past. This would definitely boost victims' confidence and make them feel better about themselves. Even though you may not be able to easily eradicate a scar, they can be turned into something that is more appealing.

More and more people are using tattoos to cope with the grief of losing one of their loved ones. Memorial tattoos are important ways of remembering the person he or she lost. Having a tattoo that symbolizes the person is like having a permanent connection with that important person. These tattoos let a person carry the memory of a loved one everywhere. A pet owner once got a tattoo to remember the life of her kitten Basil. During her kitten's final days she decided to get a tattoo of basil leaves with her kitten's ashes in it. She said that since she incorporated her kitten's ashes in her tattoo, he'll always be with me (Rodriguez,2014,p.8). Getting a tattoo to remember a person is to make you feel as if you are still close to that person, almost like they have not traveled too far.

The skin that a person wears is theirs. There is nothing wrong with a person using their body as a coloring book. (Thompson,2016) Tattoos are like little openings to a person's soul. They are used for a great number of purposes including the expressing of people, covering of imperfections, or a remembrance for a lost loved one. A person's body should be treated as their canvas, while tattoos should be their masterpiece. The skin should always be freed and embraced!

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Tattoo As A Tool For Self-Expression. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

First Amendment Freedoms

There are many important freedoms that are protected by the first amendment but in this essay were going to discuss my opinions on what are the 5 most important ones and why i think that. In my opinion i feel as though the most important freedoms are; freedom of speech, search and seizure, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and the freedom of assembly/ petition. These are the ones that affect people the most. The ones that are used more often than most. They help keep people in check and help their problems peacefully. Freedom of the press is important because it allows news channels to keep us updated on the things that are happening in the world. This makes the public feel like there is less being hidden from the government. Also allows them to know the type of crime thats been happening near them or just in general. It can also help people with basic information such as the weather, car accidents and closings of roads, new businesses in the area or new products in the market, etc. every morning most people in the u.s wake up and turn on the news to know what's new with the day and what's going on in their area. People who are on their way to work listen to the radio to stay up to date on car crashes and closed roads on their route to work/school/anywhere. They also like to listen to music to wake them up or to help them get threw the dreadful moments of bumper to bumper traffic, helping people keep a cool head and not murder someone. Freedom of Search and seizures is also a very important freedom because it makes the citizens feel safe about being harrassed for no reason. People like their privacy and don't really like to be bothered or bugged about things that are gonna cause problems that aren't needed. This part of the amendment makes it to where police need a warrant for your arrest or probable cause to search you. Now this is important because if you have nothing to hide then they will have no way to get probable cause or a warrant for your arrest, also meaning that you will keep calm and not act all suspicious. Some people just get nervous while being around cops because recently there has been a lot of police brutality videos going around, so getting pulled over and being nervous might make the police look harder for probable cause. This is where the importance comes from the amendment because being that they need probable cause, being nervous isn't probable cause so you can keep your privacy and not get searched for no reason. Although if you truly have nothing to hide i would just let them search you and do their job so you can not cause any unnecessary problems, then both you and the police can just go back to their day and continue their jobs. School however is a whole different story because they are looking out for the safety of the children in the school. When a school has a feeling that there might be a student with drugs/guns/bombs on school ground they take it very seriously because it puts other kids and adults in danger. Thus why they don't need probable cause or a warrant to search threw your stuff. Especially your locker because the locker is considered school property giving them the right to search it at any time they feel the need to. This is good because there had been a lot of school shootings and bomb threats going on recently and has caused the schools around the country to be on guard more, upgrading security on school ground, more cameras, a security guard, some schools even have metal detectors now. Its making schools a safer place to be. There has been to many problems like this going on in schools across the u.s.Freedom of speech is key, communication is key as long as we can do it peacefully. This part of the amendment helps us as citizens be able to express our opinions about things without getting in trouble and feeling to controlled. It allows you to be able to have an open debate with your opinions. It makes you feel equal and feel like you have a say in things. it helps others understand everyone's perspective in things because it gives them the chance to explain without it being controlled, unless your on tv or the radio because sometimes people say things that children should not hear and sometimes kids are watching channels that they shouldn't be. Then parents get mad when their kid learns a new bad word and tries to cause problems. Having the freedom to pick your religion and practice it without having to worry about getting in trouble for something that you believe is very important. We shouldn't all have to believe in the same thing just because someone tells us to. If you feel as though god isn't real and you believe that then you have the right to believe in that just as long as you don't go and force your religion upon others who don't agree. It also shouldn't make you judge a person for what they believe in because everyone is different and have different thoughts and feelings. You can practice things your people believe in as long as it does not harm another citizen. But just because you don't have the same beliefs as others doesn't exclude you from the laws that we have in america because they are set to make everyone equal and it a fair country. Last but not least is the freedom to have assembly and petition, this is important because if you and a group of people believe in something that is against the government it helps keep a peaceful system to making everyone happy. It helps people have a chance of getting something changed that a good portion of people disagree with, they make a petition and then send it to the government to have it looked over and taken into consideration to make people happy and to see in what ways the government can assist in making it it a better place with happier people. It doesn't even have to be for the government, it could be for something like a business not hiring women because they are sexist or something like that in general. If a large group of people are not happy they can all meet up and have people stand in front of the building with signs and saying things to get people to not go into the building and use its services. As long as it remains peaceful meaning nobody's getting hurt physically. This might make the person who owns the company change the way they run it so they don't lose business because the people outside are making more and more people agree with their thoughts and opinions based on what the company is or isn't doing. These are the parts of the first amendment that i feel are most important. There are many more reasons as to why they are important. Their are so many more important parts to this amendment and more important amendments in general that help keep the u.s in check and keep it equa/fair for everyone. The government has set these in place for the constitution so that we can maintain an equal and strong nation and to make sure that peace is created between everyone.they do this to attempt to keep crime off the streets and equality amongst everyone as a u.s citizen.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

First Amendment Freedoms. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The First Amendment and Internet

According to the Constitution, the First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech (Volokh). This amendment allows citizens to freely express their ideas through written/spoken words and media such as pictures and films. However, at the same time, they are exposed to a wide range of public opinions and views that may come into conflict with their own personal beliefs and cause discomfort. With media becoming more accessible and public, more facts, opinions, and statements can be spread even if they are unpopular or inappropriate. The First Amendment provides independence for the speaker and the audience as well as the entitlement to establish different perspectives on what the individual reads and hears. Despite this freedom, the First Amendment fosters the lack of protection against the dangers and threats that are present online. As the internet becomes more commonly used, it allows anonymity, leaving people vulnerable to the unlimited forms of expression being spread and therefore, it makes it easier for internet trolls to misuse this right and achieve their goal of harassing their target. The First Amendment of free speech raises a lack of and the level of proper authority interference in the social life online. Without firm regulation and policing, it leaves the responsibility of reporting unjust and harmful media posts to the people who come across it. Even if it is reported, the social media platform or the source of authority does not necessarily take the proper actions to confront the problem that is present. Consequently, people have a contradicting attitude toward freedom of speech and government/authority intervention. In other words, citizens wish and demand for freedom, yet they also request for patrol and protection. Thus, the border that lies between: (1) freedom and monitoring and (2) what is considered appropriate or harmful becomes unclear. As a result of this matter, it enables the abuse of this God-Given freedom. According to Lindy West, these internet trolls weaponiz[e] free speech to maintain cultural dominance. In the view of the fact that the internet allows anonymity, it encourages the trolls, even more, to act as they please. Anonymity functions as an effective mobilizing force for violence (Bailey). For this reason, the internet transforms into a platform for hate speech. In addition to anonymity, the unrestricted and universal use of the internet creates easy targets for the trolls to harass. Likewise, it is advantageous for the internet trolls because they can receive attention and fulfill their desire of causing disturbance/harm to others without exposing their identity. In response to anonymity and the common-use of the internet combined, internet trolling occurs more often. As it becomes more frequent, people start to get used to it or they might pretend to not notice what is happening. When individuals are left with the accountability to filter and protect themselves, it becomes a struggle and pointless effort. By accepting the inevitable, internet trolling not only takes part in the culture of society but also forms a culture itself. According to the research conducted by Monica Anderson, about four-in-ten Americans have experienced online harassment such as physical threats, stalking, sexual harassment, purposeful embarrassment, and etc.. There are over three billion social media users in the world and only 30% of the users have reported the online harassment (Smith and Anderson). Over the course of three years, an estimate of 2.5 million cases have occurred (Buxton and Winters). One notable case of internet trolling, which occurred in 2013, was on Facebook by a man threatening to kill two hundred school children in a mass shooting (Bowcott). These threats were made weeks after the events at Sandy Hook which caused greater panic and fear within the community. The internet troll aimed at the terror and anxiety that resulted from the Sandy Hook school shooting in order to intensify and feed on the public fear. Another extreme example of internet trolling was the targeting of the deceased. This internet troll posted comments on the tribute pages, mocking the two teenagers that had passed away. One of his victims was a fifteen-year-old girl who died from being hit by a train. He not only posted a comment I fell asleep on the track lolz on the tribute page, but he also made a YouTube video after the victim with her face superimposed on the front of a tank engine (Morris). With the freedom of speech that is granted by the First Amendment, there is less consideration for others and little evidence of self-regulation amongst individuals and their interactions with each other. Thus, self-interest outweighs the consequences and effects of one's actions. Internet trolls can use and twist the concept of freedom to justify their behavior. Although freedom is needed to live life without oppression and act/think differently from other individuals, it does not necessarily guarantee safety and happiness. It raises the question of if there is and will be true, complete independence. As former Justice Robert Jackson stated, The price of freedom of speech or of the press is that we must put up with, and even pay for, a good deal of rubbish (United States v.s Ballard). Along with the freedom of speech comes deviance in the form of internet trolling and the lack of sincerity to counter this problem. In conclusion, the common and frequent usage of the internet, which allows anonymity, enables internet trolls to discover targets and harass/threaten them with ease. Through the manipulation of the First Amendment, trolls can defend their actions as proper and continue because of the confidence instilled in them. Therefore, the First Amendment makes it easier for internet trolls to threaten and cause harm to innocent people around the world using the internet.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The First Amendment And Internet. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Flag Burning and the First Amendment

Flag Burning and the First Amendment Megan M. Kalbfleisch Grantham University Flag Burning and the First Amendment One golden rule of the First Amendment would be that the United States government cannot ban free expression of any idea. It doesn't matter how much the majority disagrees with that idea or finds it offensive. Which is why American flag burning is protected under the First Amendment, it's an expression of an idea. Texas v. Johnson. In 1989 a landmark case involving flag burning, Texas v. Johnson, Greg Lee Johnson, protesting the Reagan administration's policies, burned the American flag in front of a city hall in Dallas, Tx (Oyez.org, 1989). It was held that to burn the American flag was in fact protected under the First Amendment, it was an expressive act. Burning of the American flag is still considered to be a form of speech by expressing an idea that is protected under the First Amendment. The law continues to be upheld even though so many find it offensive and despite efforts to criminalize the desecration of the American flag. Halter v. Nebraska. The controversy of desecrating the flag is not new to the courts, it has been a battle that goes back to the early 1900's with Halter v. Nebraska. Which was a case not necessarily a flag burning but was a landmark case that lead the way to the Federal Flag Desecration Law. Two businessmen were barred from selling their beer with the American Flag on their bottles (NCC Staff, 2018). In 1968, The United States Congress passed the Federal Flag Desecration Law. The law was passed after a protest to the Vietnam War. This new law made it illegal to knowingly cast contempt on any flag that represents the United States by trampling on it, burning it, mutilating it publicly, defacing it, or defiling the flag (NCC Staff, 2018). Spence v. Washington. In 1974 another desecration case, Spence v. Washington. Harold Spence used tape to make a peace sign on an American flag that he displayed outside of his home in Seattle, WA. Spence was arrested and convicted for displaying the American flag with the symbol adhered to it, even though he offered to take it down when approached by law enforcement, a violation under a Washington statute. Supreme Court rejected the argument that the Washington Statute violated Spence's First Amendment (Oyez.org, 1974). Overturned. Because of Johnson's case in 1984 both the case in Washington and the case in Nebraska the convictions were overturned. Congress has been placed in many situations where making a decision that does not necessarily fit within their principles. However, their commitment to the judicial process and upholding the laws in the Constitution are important. Flag Protection Act. The Flag Protection Act of 1989 was passed by Congress because of the Johnson decision. This Act was the first attempt to overturn the Johnson cases decision to uphold that flag burning be protected as a political expression falling under the First Amendment. At the same time, there were two other attempts at outlawing flag burning. The first was the Flag Protection Amendment and the second was the Flag Protection Act. The Flag Protection Amendment was voted down, however, the Flag Protection Act passed by both the Republicans and Democrats of Congress agreed with the Act. President Bush permitted the bill without his signature, in becoming law. Although the Act was just an amendment to an already existing U.S. Code (Apel, 2018). In the same year, in fact the day that the bill was in effect, several people burned their American flags in protest of the Flag Protection Act and its violation of the First Amendment. Several people were charged with violating the new law, of those charged were a Shawn Eichman and Mark Haggerty. U.S. v. Haggerty and U.S. v. Eichman. The U.S. v. Haggerty and the U.S. v. Eichman both argued together for setting flags on fire at the U.S. Capitol steps. In both cases protesters had their charges dismissed by federal judges which cited the Texas v. Johnson case. In 1990 the Supreme Court upheld that the Flag Protection Act was in fact unconstitutional, the law does remain as part of U.S. Code today (Apel, 2018). Although the controversy on the legalities regarding the desecration of the American flag being a violation of the First Amendment never really went away, it recently has come back into the media with President Trump. President Donald Trump. Donald Trump most recently stating that he plans on prosecuting flag burning protestors. In 2016, President Donald Trump proposed that there needed to be some sort of penalty for participating in the burning of the American Flag (Wright, 2016). It is obvious that in the heat of the moment President Trump says a lot of things, that he may have thought about in passing at one point or another but has not fully thought it through, especially when it comes to Twitter. His proposal of jail time or loss of citizenship for burning the American flag, does not take into consideration the two U.S. Supreme Court rulings, both of which protect this form of free speech under the First Amendment. "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag -- if they do, there must be consequences -- perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" Trump tweeted. Even though frequent efforts have been attempted over the years, and probably will for years to come. The U.S. Supreme Court remains vigilant in its protection of the First Amendment Right and prohibiting the burning of the American Flag. References Apel, Warren. (2018). The Flag Burning Page. Flag Protection. https://www.esquilax.com/flag/protection.shtml Bomboy, Scott. (2016). Flag burning and the First Amendment: Yet another look at the two. Constitution Daily Blog. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/flag-burning-and-the-first-amendment-yet-another-look-at-the-two/ NCC Staff. (2018). When the Supreme Court Ruled to Allow Flag Burning. Constitution Daily Blog. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/when-the-supreme-court-ruled-to-allow-american-flag-burning Spence v. Washington. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/72-1690 Texas v. Johnson. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1988/88-155 United States v. Eichman. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1989/89-1433 Wright, David. (2016). Trump: Burn the Flag, Go to Jail. CNN Politics. https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/29/politics/donald-trump-flag-burning-penalty-proposal/index.html
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Flag Burning and the First Amendment. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Government Regulation of First Amendment

The US Constitution was drafted to ensure the rights of the American people. Every amendment and article that has been added to the Constitution for that purpose of ensuring the protection of every right of American citizens. Since the Constitution was established, there have been many court cases that challenged American citizens' rights. Some of these cases have set precedents for future cases such as Marbury v. Madison (1803), Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The Declaration of Independence states, among these [rights] are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, and the American court system cannot deny nor rule against the rights of the American people.

First Amendment Rights

The First Amendment to the Constitution states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press (Constitution). These rights are guaranteed to be protected by the Supreme Court. Cases that have protected the First Amendment are Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) and Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986). These cases are important to know as an American Citizen because they are referenced in many cases involving freedom of speech, expression, and press.
The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion to every American citizen. However, since America was discovered by Christopher Columbus in 1492, religion has been used to incite violence. The commissioner of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission stated that I would also like to reiterate what we said in the hearing or the last meeting. Freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust, whether it be”I mean, we-we can list hundreds of situations where freedom of religion has been used to justify discrimination. And to me, it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to”to use their religion to hurt others (SCOTUS, 13). The Colorado Civil Rights Commission is no stranger to the First Amendments rights, considering their case against Masterpiece Cakeshop in 2017.

Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Jack Phillips, owner, and operator of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado refused to bake a cake for Charlie Craig and David Mullins, a same-sex couple, wedding ceremony due to his religious views on homosexual marriage. During that time, Colorado had not legalized gay marriage. State law also allowed storekeepers to decline to create specific messages that they considered offensive to a certain extent.
After Phillips declined to make them a cake, the couple filed charges with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Their claim was that Phillips violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation in a place of business engaged in any sales to the public and any offering servicesto the public. The CCRC referred the case to have a formal hearing before the Administrative Law Judge, who ruled in favor of the couple. However, the ALJ rejected Phillips' First Amendment claims saying that requiring him to make a cake for a same-sex couple is a violation of his freedom of religion. According to Douglas Fraleigh, the Christians hold the belief in freedom of speech due to their Hebrew heritage (Fraleigh, 2011, p. 28). In 2017, the case found its way to the US Supreme Court where there was a 7-2 ruling in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop. Considering that commission sided with the couple and did not act as a neutral, unbiased party, Justice Anthony Kennedy ruled that they had been hostile to Jack Phillips' religious beliefs.

Legality of the Case

When studying this case, some questions considering the religious beliefs of Jack Phillips may rise. What is defined as religious beliefs? An attempt to define religion, even for purposes of increasing freedom of religions, would run afoul of the ?establishment' clause as excluding some religions, or even as establishing a notion respecting religion (Lockhart, 1987, p. 1113). If the Communist Party claimed religious status during the Red Scare, would the criminal syndicalism laws that limited free speech have passed (Mineshima-Lowe)? One could argue that systems such as Communism explain the meaning and purpose of life, therefore, it fits the status quo of a religion. Another could argue that Democracy and Fascism could also be defined as religions because they fit that description. When defining religion, one must look at one of the philosophers who inspired the US Constitution, John Locke. John Locke religious views would limit religious freedom to forms of worship that have no destabilizing political consequences (Kessler). In that case, the religious views of Jack Phillips seem to fit that description. With that in mind, the First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion to any US citizen, which holds a solid defense for Jack Phillips.

Section one of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution, in summary, states, All persons born or naturalized in the United Statesare citizens of the United Statesno state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United Statesnor deny to any personthe equal protection of the law (SCOTUS). This amendment commonly referred to as the equal protection of the law amendment is famously noted in groundbreaking cases such as Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. Craig and Mullins pleaded the Fourteenth Amendment when Phillips refused to sell them a personalized wedding cake. As soon as we sat down with the owner, he asked who the cake was for, we told him that it was us, and he informed us that he would not bake a cake for a same-sex weddingwe were mortified and humiliated stated David Mullins in a post-trial interview (Barnes). Phillips told the couple that he would happily sell them anything else in his shop, but since their request goes against his religious views, he respectfully declined.
After the case was decided, Phillips' appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals. Phillips then petitioned to the Supreme Court for certiorari with the following question: Whether applying Colorado's public accommodations law to compel Phillips to create an expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment (SCOTUS). The Supreme Court found the CCRC guilty because of their bias of the gay couple.

Rhetoric

The Supreme Court used an exceptional amount of hypothetical questions in their questioning of the lawyers. The questions varied from a baker calling their cake a piece of expressional artwork to an architect expressing themselves in their buildings. The Supreme Court continued to ask both attorneys, Frederick Yager with Craig and Mullins, and Kristen Waggoner with Masterpiece Cakeshop until they reached a decision.

Michael Farris, President, CEO, and General Counsel of the Alliance Defending Freedom stated in his post-trial interview that this is the first time in American history where there is a serious consideration of compelling people to deliver a message that's contrary to their beliefs (SCOTUS). Farris also gave a lot of bold statements about the First Amendment including that freedom of speech includes the context where other people may be offended (SCOTUS). Conclusion

This case puts America in a sticky situation because, in order for this case to set the precedent for future cases, the Supreme Court would be forced to decide if the fourteenth or the First Amendment is worth sacrificing. The Supreme Court decided in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop due to bias. The main argument for Waggoner was that the CCRC violated Phillips' First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of religion. The main argument for Yager was that Masterpiece Cakeshop violated the Fourteenth Amendment when they refused service to the couple.

In regards to the law, the Supreme Court made the right decision because the CCRC showed bias when they should have acted as a neutral party. Michael Farris also said in his interview that tolerance is a two-way street (Farris). Showing tolerance to one side and not the other is not freedom. If this incident were to happen in 2018, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of the gay couple due to Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized gay marriage in 2015 guaranteed by the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause (Oyez). Before this ruling, Republicans tried for many years to put an amendment on a ballot to make gay-marriage illegal across the country (Klarman, 2014, p.193). For future cases that are similar to this, the Supreme Court will have to judge on a case-by-case basis because there is nothing legally restricting business owners from expressing their views on their creations.

References

  1. Fraleigh, D. (2011). Freedom of Expression in the Marketplace of Ideas. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  2. Klarman, M. (2014). From the Closet to the Altar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Lockhart, W. (1987). Constitutional Law. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publish Co.
  4. Mineshima-Lowe, D. (unknown) Retrieved November 11, 2018, from https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/942/criminal-syndicalism-laws
  5. Robert Barnes (December 5, 2017) Retrieved November 13, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-asked-if-wedding-cake-bakers-case-protects-religious-freedom-or-illegal-discrimination/2017/12/05/c73e6efa-d969-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b158236af045
  6. The Supreme Court of the United States (2017, October). Retrieved November 8, 2018, from
    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf
  7. The Supreme Court of the United States (2018, June) Retrieved November 13, 2018, from https://www.c-span.org/video/?438139-1/supreme-court-hears-masterpiece-Cakeshop-v-colorado-civil-rights-commission-case
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Government Regulation of First Amendment. (2019, Apr 26). Retrieved November 3, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/04/page/2/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay
Stop wasting your time searching for samples!
You can find a skilled professional who can write any paper for you.
Get unique paper