Month: March 2019
Mohandas Gandhi and Malcolm X
Mohandas Gandhi and Malcolm X were both strong activists for social rights. They led in similar yet different fashions. These men both used their beliefs in religion to create change in the world.
The well-known Mahatma Gandhi and Malcolm X left behind legacies that still have an impact on the world today. One of the essential factors that impacted these two historical figures was religion. The characteristics of Hinduism surely had an impact on Gandhi's peaceful ways that he went about things. The Islamic faith that Malcolm X followed, led him to follow the beliefs of using any means necessary. This was his famous quote. Their spiritual affiliations were not solely identifying elements in their lives.
Gandhi's belief in Hinduism and Malcolm X's Islamic beliefs share some comparable views and multiple vastly diverse ones. Hindus believe in karma and reincarnation until you emerge as perfect.This is why all of Gandhi's actions were based off of being pure and doing the right thing. On the other hand, Muslims believe in one life and a remaining day of judgment before their Allah or God. Malcolm shows this belief through his actions of doing everything in his power to get what he wanted done. Hinduism expresses that all religions are real pathways back to the Supreme Creator; Muslims usually have contempt for other faiths and agree with that only these of their faith are allowed into heaven, and solely sure ones whom are chosen by the Allah. The belief in that, all life is sacred and the exercise of peace, or non-injury, is a large section of the faith of Hinduism. Muslims are very opposite with their faith of the jihad. They believe in the reality that they are inclined to damage others or themselves in order to make it into their heaven. Malcolm demonstrates this belief in saying how it is okay to fight back if it is necessary. Despite their diverse beliefs, each of these religions are two of the three largest followed faiths in the world, which helped each of the figure to speak to large populations and relate to these groups in many ways.
Religion performed a massive function in each Malcolm X and Gandhi lives. It influenced their views, ideas, and whole existences. Gandhi believed in the fact that nonviolence was the sole way to reach equality. Even when Gandhi was attacked, he would not react in any violent fashion. This is demonstrated in the film, Ghandi multiple times. One instance was where Gandhi had all of his men protesting working at the mines, when the police force came to attack them and shut everything down, the enormous group of people protesting simply laid down on the ground. The police were charging at them on their horses, which were spooked by the obstacle and had no choice but to turn around. Another example of Gandhi's peaceful protest was when he had been burning the immigration cards and being beaten to the ground by British officials. He continued to stand there and burn the cards without fighting back physically or verbally despite the brutal pain he was enduring. These actions speak much louder than any words could. On the contrary to what Gandhi does and says, Malcolm X believes that if someone comes towards you using violence, you should react in the same way they treated you. In his autobiography Malcolm X states, Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery (Malcolm).
In my personal opinion, I believe that Gandhi was a more prominent leader. I believe this because his ways of changing the world were through peace and morality. The saying fighting fire with fire makes only a bigger fire is relevant in many aspects of life. Gandhi's way of fighting for equality was well respected around the world by many races and religions. His goal was for everyone to come together and to create equality for all. He brought many people together to help this cause in an incredibly powerful way.
Cite this page
Mohandas Gandhi and Malcolm X. (2019, Mar 26).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Malcolm X: Rights of African Americans
African Americans have come a long way for freedom and civil rights. Because of this, movements have taken place peacefully throughout history to obtain these opportunities. Prominent figures in society have fought for minorities to be free, represented, and understood. Although these privileges are now apparent in the world, for most, they are still presented with trials and tribulations that ultimately prohibit them from prospering in the same way as their counterparts. Malcolm X, an African American activist, and minister helped shaped the Civil Rights era by continuing his education to become an advocate for black rights, introducing his philosophies to allow others to understand their significance in society, and by influencing others to continue championing for civil rights.
Malcolm X furthered his education and in doing so was motivated to push for African Americans rights. He graduated from junior high school at the top of his class, only to lose interest after a favorite teacher told him that his dream of becoming a lawyer was, no realistic goal for a negro (Malcolm X: The Ballot or the Bullet par 1). Malcolm X was a stellar student that was shattered after his teacher's harsh words. X willingly listened to this negativity and gave up. As a result, he summoned up vengeance and got into trouble. In 1946, while imprisoned for robbery, Malcolm X converted to the Black Muslim faith and, within years of his release, rose up the ranks as a minister in the Nation of Islam (Malcolm X: The Ballot or the Bullet par 2). After realizing his mistake, X turned his life around and became a minister and to preach the values of freedoms to his people for representation. This allowed him to prosper and teach Black Americans their standing in life along with their purpose.
Malcolm X's philosophies allowed African Americans to understand their importance in the world. Malcolm X's charisma and intelligence allowed people to take interest in him as he advocated for black rights. Because of this, X uncovered the true accounts of what African Americans faced in a racially conscious world. Malcolm X wanted African Americans to prevail and often urged those to seek courage like himself and voice their opinions. "He espoused the primacy of racial dignity and encouraged the black man to elevate his own society instead of trying to force himself into the unwanted presence of the white society" (Malcolm X 1925-1965 par 12). X preached for the black man to venture outside of the white man's world and way of thinking to achieve growth and gain independence to create a world symbolic and worthy of their own culture. Because of this, Black Americans were given the motivation to overcome their daily struggles by furthering their education, building their own businesses to become independent from their counterparts.
Malcolm X's legacy influenced others to continue their favoring for black rights even after his assassination. Malcolm's immediate legacy was in the burgeoning black power movement in which he directly influenced the political development of Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale"" (Cuthbert-Kerr par 5). With an inspiration from X, both Newton. By influencing various organizations to movies and music, the legacy Malcolm X left behind was embraced fully. Individuals continue to bring awareness to black lives and their matters by standing firmly to help overcome living in a society full of pressures to build a foundation of positivity.
Today, Malcolm X continues his prominent legacy as a courageous figure in history that fought peacefully for black rights throughout the fifties and sixties. With these challenges being hard to fathom during the civil rights movement, X stood by his people and promoted peaceful protests to boycott the harsh treatments experienced by those around them. Although Malcolm X was known to be controversial by speaking out for African Americans, there is no denying that he impacted black culture through his teachings, his enamored ways of identifying equality and by standing up for what was right even though many did not agree. Without Malcolm X's contributions in the world, the beauty of being black would not be as significant and symbolic as it is today.
Works Cited
Cuthbert-Kerr, Simon. "Malcolm X." Encyclopedia of American Studies, edited by Simon Bronner, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1st edition, 2016. Credo Reference, https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/jhueas/malcolm_x/0?institutionId=8703. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.
"Malcolm X (19251965)." The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame, Peter Dreier, Nation Books, 1st edition, 2012. Credo Reference, https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/persgreatest/malcolm_x_1925_1965/0?institutionId=8703. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.
Malcolm X: The Ballot or the Bullet, April 3, 1964." Ripples of Hope: Great American Civil Rights Speeches, edited by Josh. Gottheimer, et al., Perseus, 1st edition, 2003. Credo Reference, https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/pershope/malcolm_x_the_ballot_or_the_bullet_april_3_1964/0?institutionId=8703.
Cite this page
Malcolm X: Rights of African Americans. (2019, Mar 26).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Malcolm X’s Legendary Speech: “The Ballot or the Bullet”
In his speech, The Ballot or the Bullet, Malcolm X challenges African Americans to practice black nationalism and become more active in their pursuit of equal rights by means of cooperation or violence. Born May 19, 1925 Earl and Louise Little had given birth to a baby boy named Malcolm Little, the fourth child of eight, who would later go on to change his last name to X, to symbolize that his true African name had been lost. Malcolm looked highly of his father, ... a preacher who was also an active member of the local chapter of the Universal Negro Improvement Association and avid supporter of black nationalist leader Marcus Garvey (Biography.com Editors). From his fathers involvement and status in the civil rights activism movements, Malcolm and his family suffered many attacks and threats from white supremacy groups including the Ku Klux Klan.
Supremacists burned his home to flames as a child and killed his father, leaving his mother mentally scarred and unstable, which lead to her arrival in an insane asylum, separating her children into foster homes. At the tender age of 13, Malcolm was kicked out of school and sent to a juvenile detention home, later attending Mason Junior High School where he was elected class president by his predominantly white classmates (Biography.com Editors). As well as Malcolm did academically in school, it all came to a stop for him when his school teacher told a heart-wrenching comment that would stick with him forever, ...his aspirations of being a lawyer were 'no realistic goal for a nigger'... It made him feel that there was no place in the white world for a career-oriented black man, no matter how smart he was (Rodgers). Malcolm dropped out of school in the eighth grade at the age of 15.
Jobless, a young Malcolm turned to the criminal underworld, and got involved with drugs and theft, which in turn supported him with a lavish lifestyle, until he was caught at the age of 21 charged with larceny. While in prison, X educated himself by reading every book he could get his hands on, making him even more educated and intelligent than he had already proven to be. His newfound knowledge and frequent visits from siblings lead him to make the decision to convert to the Nation of Islam, like most of his brothers and siblings had already done. Malcolm had soon became a minister of a few temples, and preached to the followers of this religious movement that they had the power to fight off segregationist ideals and form their own independent black nation, with or without violence. Malcolm X repeatedly asserted that, there has never been a nonviolent revolution?? imploring Black people to take the fight beyond civil rights and expand it to human rights (Daniels).
However, in 1964 Malcolm departed from the Nation of Islam for two main reasons, one being his mentors sins and the other on his response to a touchy subject for the American citizens. Malcolms mentor and friend Elijah Muhammad had been conducting affairs with the Nations secretaries, which went against the beliefs both Malcolm and Muhammad had preached for. Second, Malcolm had been angered by the actions of the Nation, so when asked about the assassination of Americas then president, John F. Kennedy, he spoke his truth with no regards for the reaction of the public. When specifically told not to comment on this subject Malcolm stated, ... the infamous 'Chickens coming home to roost' Saying America reaped what they sowed (McNeil). He furthermore stated murders of black civil rights activist and leaders implying that his assassination should be treated not differently than these Black activists were mourned, leading to a public outcry from all over America.
Shortly after Malcolms excommunication and departure from the Nation of Islam, he presented America with one of the most influential and diaguinshed speeches in the history of African American civil rights, The Ballot or the Bullet. Malcolm delivered his notorious speech during the current election year between democrat Lyndon B. Johnson and republican Barry M. Goldwater. This was an influential moment in time for this speech to occur, because Malcolm wanted the Black people of America to know that they had a voice and the power to make equality a reality if they banded together to make a political change in the nations system of government. ... his target was not to enrage white people in 'The Ballot or the Bullet', as it was a message of self-help and personal responsibility toward black men and women (McNeil). In his speech, X covered a wide variety of topics concerning to the Black community including: religion, politics, job creations, voting rights and most importantly, human rights. The main message was that African Americans had a choice to move forward with their future and how it can change, by choosing the Ballot, or the Bullet. The Ballot or the Bullet is a wordplay on the infamous phrase by Patrick Henry, Give me liberty, or give me death in which the Ballot represents America giving Black people equal voting rights and the Bullet representing the violence that would occur in the nation if equality was not granted.
In his speech, Malcolm X used a series of rhetorical devices to better express his opinions and views on the subject. Malcolm's tone throughout the speech was that of much anger and he criticizes American society. His tone reaches the audience in an inspirational way, as he progressively becomes more outraged and translates that through the audience. His goal of the speech was to expose all of the injustices America and its citizens had been committing toward African Americans. His diction was informal as he projects his speech in a way that would make the audience know he was apart of this injustice and so they would easily understand his mindset for those who were uneducated as well as educated. However, he also incorporates a formality into his speech, using strong vocabulary showing that he was a well-educated man, proving that he is perfectly capable of making a change for human rights. He was emotionally charged and his persuasive language and rhetoric made it compelling for the audience to evoke feelings on the subject of civil rights.
Rhetorical questions are said a numerous amount of times to emphasize his point and make the audience question and think about the illogical approaches the government has made progressively for carrying out the Black communities rights. For example, The question tonight, as I understand it, is 'The Negro Revolt, and Where Do We Go From here?' or What Next?' (Malcolm X, The Ballot or the Bullet). While Malcolm uses a series of devices in his speech, the most evident was his use of repetition of the speeches title, The Ballot or the Bullet. He repeatedly quotes this significant phrase, because it stays within the audience's mind and draws their attention to the focus of the speech time after time. Another important strategy used, was his use of ethos to strategically convince his audience to to agree and understand where he was coming from. His use of ethos can be found in many instances but when he first began his speech he stated this, We all have the same problem. They don't hang you because you're a Baptist; They don't attack me because I'm a Muslim; they attack me cause im black. They attack all of us for the same reason (Malcolm X, The Ballot or the Bullet). Ethos is shown through that specific quote, because he was relating himself to the people he was standing up for, creating a sense of credibility.
On February 21, 1965, almost a year after his monumental speech, Malcolm X was shot down and assassinated by members of The Nation of Islam while he was speaking at a rally in New York City. While Malcolm was alive, many people, outside of his supporters, viewed him as a babble- mouth who preached for violence, but after his death, America started to view his ideologies in a different perspective. The publication of his autobiography skyrocketed and movements were created in honor of his legacy. Malcolm X's speech is classified as a great American speech because of the way he connected to his audience, expressed his radical ideals, empowered a change in the government, and showed the Black community that they are capable of creating a new future for themselves by any means big or small. His impact on American society and his legacy will forever stay current, to inspire our nation at the lowest times, Because power, real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action"" (Biography.com Editors).
Cite this page
Malcolm X's Legendary Speech: "The Ballot or the Bullet". (2019, Mar 26).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Malcolm X Biography
He was born May 19th, 1925 in Omaha, Nebraska Malcolm X (originally Malcolm Little)'s father, a baptist minister, was an activist but he was killed when Malcolm was 6 years old, making the family poor. His mother went mad and was placed in an asylum, and siblings and him were sent to foster homes
He quits formal education when told he would be a carpenter and not a lawyer in 8th grade. He was sent a juvenile detention home in Michigan but soon was moved to the Roxbury section of Boston to live with his half-sister Ella, from his father's previous marriage.
During his teenage years, he dealt drugs, was a hustler, and was the leader of a gang of thieves in Roxbury and Harlem (NY)
He was in prison for robbery from 1946 to 1952, which lead him to convert himself, and join the Nation Of Islam - his brother Reginald was also a member and was one of the reason Malcolm decided to convert- they had been in prison together in 1948.
The Nation Of Islam was a movement for African-Americans that combined elements of black nationalism and Islam
He quit eating pork, smoking and gambling to be in this Nation - all those were part of the requirements to be a member.
All members had to replace their last name with 'X', it was a custom among the Nation of Islam followers who considered their last name to have originated from white slaveholders
He met Elijah Muhammad (leader of the Nation Of Islam) in Chicago (1952), who inspired him to organize temples for the Nations in New York, Philadelphia, Boston and other cities in the Southern US, and he created the Nation's newspaper: Muhammad Speaks
Contrary to other activists who wanted African-American rights to be equal to white rights, Malcolm X argued that blacks were naturally superior to whites
Malcolm became the minister of one of the temples that he founded himself: Temple No. 11 in Boston. He was later promoted to be the minister at Temple No. 7 in Harlem
Elijah Muhammad appointed Malcolm X as the National Representative of the Nation of Islam. This meant that Malcolm was the most important person in the Nation, right after Elijah
Malcolm spoke at many universities including Harvard and Oxford around the major phase of the civil rights movement: 1955 - 1965
1963 - deep tensions between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammad ovec the political direction of the Nation
Malcolm brought bad publicity to the Nation with a controversial comment about President John F. Kennedy, so was ordered by Elijah to do a period of silence for 90 days - they then became estranged
Malcolm left the Nation in 1964
He made a pilgrimage to Mecca,, and converted himself again to Sunni Islam, and adopting the Muslim el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz and stopped believing in the separatist ways of the Nation
In 1965, he founded the Organization of Afro-American Unity, moving from civil rights to human rights
Malcolm received open death threats and violence due to the hostility between him the Nation
He was assassinated on February 21st 1965 while giving a lecture in the Audubon ballroom in Harlem - 3 members of the Nation of Islam were convicted for it
Impact on Society:
Malcolm X was a standout amongst the most huge figures inside the American dark patriot development. A significant number of the thoughts he explained, similar to race pride and self-protection, ended up ideological pillars of the Black Power development that rose during the 1960s and '70s'.
Cite this page
Malcolm X Biography. (2019, Mar 26).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
African American Leader: Malcolm X
In 1946, Malcolm X and his friends were arrested of burglary, while Malcolm X was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but he was released on parole seven years after serving his sentence. During these seven years, Malcolm’s family and friends mentioned to him a Muslim religion, that advocated African Americans to self-reliance, which religious organization made Malcolm X interested. He decided to wrote to the leader of the Nation of Islam, Elijah Muhammad, but he spent seven years in prison, he found that he did not have enough words to write letters, so he began to read hard. He particularly praised Mao Zedong, because Mao Zedong advocated a violent revolution like him. Because there was a weekly debate in the prison, it makes Malcolm X became an outstanding speaker.
After parole, since Malcolm X had already contacted Elijah in prison, Elijah appreciated him and let him become a pastor. He believed that Elijah was a saint in religion and morality. Malcolm X set an example for himself, proclaimed Islam to everyone, and he won the warm support of the African Americans. With his efforts, he soon became one of the leaders of the Nation of Islam. In 1963, Elijah Muhammad was accused by two Muslim female secretaries, saying that he was the father of four of their children. Malcolm X never thought that the saint who was enshrined by the African Americans had committed adultery. For his conscience and justice, he decided to leave Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two prominent African American leaders in the mid-20th century Civil Rights Movement, all of whom were assassinated at the age of 39. Martin Luther King advocates a nonviolent resistance, while Malcolm X advocates a violent resistance. However, the differences of thought between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, only reflect the difference in the means of struggle. This two men led the Civil Rights Movement in the South and the North respectively, they jointly promoted the development of the Civil Rights Movement, and they make unremitting efforts for freedoms and equal rights of African Americans.
After leaving the Nation of Islam, Malcolm X knew that he could not live for a long time, and he thought he had done his best for his people. His speech ""The Ballot or the Bullet"" was published on April 3, 1964. Just 10 months after the speech was published, on February 21, 1965, Malcolm X delivered a speech at the Audubon Ballroom in Manhattan, three gunmen suddenly rushed onstage and shot him with 15 times at close range. At this day, Malcolm X died.
Cite this page
African American Leader: Malcolm X. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Malcolm X African American Leader of Islam
An African American leader of Islam was born on May 19, 1925. Malcolm X, whose birth name is Malcolm Little, was born in Omaha, Nebraska. The father of Malcolm X was named James Earl Little. Though the family lived in Omaha, the Klu Klux Klan threatened the family and forced them into Lansing, Michigan. His father was murdered by the Black Legion. Malcolm was stripped from his family by welfare caseworkers. He moved to Boston and became involved many times in criminal activity, moving in and out of jail several times.
Malcolm was arrested once again in 1946 because of a robbery. It became a routine to Malcolm to be in jail, but he never realized the incredible change in his life that was to come. To pass the time he spent in jail, Malcolm X spent countless hours in the prison library, completely memorizing a dictionary verbatim. He attended debate classes due to his interest in increasing his investigation skills. While he was incarcerated, Malcolm encounters the teachings of the leader of the Nation of Islam named Elijah Muhammad. The followers of Muhammad are called Black Muslims. The teachings had a huge impact on Malcolm X which caused him to self-educate and take on the last name X to serve as a symbol for his stolen African identity. X is a common name taken on by members of the nation, usually to get rid of their family name which they believed was started by their slaveholders in the past. HIs brother Reginald, who was jailed in Norfolk County Prison with Malcolm, also influenced him to become part of the Nation. Reginald later became a member with Malcolm in Detroit. Malcolm and his brother became super strong in their faith, giving up things they both enjoyed such as smoking, gambling, and eating pork. He was very prideful in his defending of the African American race and his muslim beliefs. Malcolm X became an important religious leader to the Nation of Islam and was looked up to by many Muslims and African Americans.
Once Malcolm was released from prison, he led the Nation of Islam during the period of its greatest growth. He started creating temples in the Big Apple. He started a newspaper called Muhammad speaks, which described the evils of whites and talked about the superiority of blacks. Malcolm was so influential to people the Nation gained 500,000 Islamic members. He started speaking in the streets of Harlem and large universities such as Oxford and Harvard. He preached against the main civil rights movement, turning Martin Luther King Jr. into his rival. Malcolm strongly felt that African Americans deserved more than just being able to sit in a restaurant or be able to vote. Malcolm said to his followers, defend yourself by any means necessary. These preachings led to the foundation of the Black Power and Black Consciousness movements in the late 1960's and 70's. Malcolm X is the reason blacks are referred to as black and Afro-American instead of negro and coloured. Elijah Muhammad started second guessing himself when he sees Malcolm is becoming too powerful. These two are straining further from the partner title and closer to the enemy description. He thinks he should suspend Malcolm from the Nation. There was a climax in the tension between Elijah Muhammad and Malcolm. They both thought the direction of the political movement should be moving different ways. Malcolm believes the Nation should lean more towards the civil rights protests instead of just being a critic on the sidelines. Malcolm reaches the conclusion that Muhammad is breaking the moral code of the religion, bearing children to 6 of his personal secretaries. The issue was then made public, which worsened people's views on the Nation. To make things worse, Malcolm publicly calls President Kennedy's assassination an example of chickens coming home to roost. This was the last straw for Malcolm. Muhammad commands Malcolm to be silent for 90 days. The 90 day silence became an eternity of no communication between Malcolm and Muhammad. The partnership is over.
After leaving the nation in 1964, Malcolm founded Muslim Mosque Inc. He decides to leave the nation, making a Muslim trip to Mecca. Here, he was not judged by his race by the Orthodox Muslims. Not only did he create an Organization of Afro-American Unity while he was there, he also changed his name to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. During this trip to Mecca, he is converted, once again, to another branch of the religion called Sunni Islam. Malcolm believes the solution to the United States problems is to convert anyone and everyone to orthodox Islam. This large change was to transition from civil rights to human rights. As Malcolm's departure from the Nation grew broader, the death threats and hostility from the people grew even larger. Malcolm was beginning to become hated. The leader of the Nation of Islam lived a short life, being assassinated like his father on February 21, 1965. He was speaking publicly in the Audubon Ballroom in the city of Harlem, being murdered by three members from the Nation.
In conclusion, Malcolm X, also called El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, was an incredibly large influence in the religion of Islam and to the race of the African-Americans. Many admired Malcolm and his teachings, and they lived their lives parallel to what he taught. The death of the leader impacted many people in a very negative way, leaving them without a role model or a father-figure to look up to. He was a very important part to the Islamic culture, as well as a celebrity to the United States. The teachings of Malcolm X still reside today, and are followed by many people all over the world.
Cite this page
Malcolm X African American leader of Islam. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Introduction to Malcolm X and his Life
Malcolm Little, better known as Malcolm X, was born May 19, 1925 and assassinated February 21, 1965. He was an African-American leader and figurehead in the Nation of Islam (NOI), important to the movement for freedom and equality in postwar America because of his orations regarding, race, pride, and black nationalism in the 1950s and 1960s. Early in life, Malcolm struggled to survive as a black, young man growing up in Omaha, Nebraska, especially with a father whose activism for the local chapter of the Universal Negro Improvement Association and preaching gained attention from white supremacist groups, leading to his family's frequent encounters with harassment. Persecution followed the family as they moved from Omaha to Milwaukee to Lansing, and eventually led to the 1921 death of his father. After his mother was admitted into a mental institution following her husband's death, Malcolm and his siblings were put into separate foster homes.
Although he excelled in school, he was not expected to do much. At fifteen, his English teacher made this clear, telling him explicitly that his dream of becoming a lawyer was unrealistic. Malcolm dropped out of school and eventually earned a 10 year prison sentence in 1946. HE occupied his time in prison by reading books and getting familiar with the Nation of Islam by visiting siblings. NOI was a small faction of black Muslims who embraced black nationalism, believing that in order to gain freedom, justice, and equality, black Americans must establish an independent state from white Americans. His conversion to the Nation of Islam, before his release from prison in 1952, would lead to his work as a minister and activist for the NOI, where he would work alongside their leader, Elijah Muhammad, to expand the movement's following among black Americans.
This time in postwar America, is populated with rapid progress in almost every way possible. Between 1945 and 1960, the gross national product in the US more than doubles; the economy is booming and much of it is a result of government spending on interstate highways, schools, veterans' benefits, and new technologies, like military airplanes and consumer goods. Middle-class Americans had more money to spend than ever before and usually spent it on leisure and children. However, beneath this picture of a prosperous America, issues regarding civil rights and counterculture begin to erupt. In 1948 we begin to see our government take on these greater issues. President Truman issued an executive order that outlawed segregation in the US military and the Supreme Court declared government support, enforcing restrictive agreements to exclude minorities from buying homes in white neighborhoods, to be illegal with the Shelley v. Kraemer case. The 1950s was the first time, however, that this fight against racism and segregation, truly entered mainstream of American life. Malcolm Little, at this same time, makes his first statement as a newly devoted follower of NOI by changing his surname to X at the suggestion of his leader, Elijah Muhammad. This was meant to abandon what he, and, considered to be his slave name and also signify his lost tribal name.
After his release from prison, was quickly appointed as a minister and national spokesman by Muhammad. Under Muhammad's lead, the NOI developed a coherent theology, as opposed to its founder, Wallace D. Fard. He taught the basic principles of Islam, including monotheism, submission to Allah, and a strong family life, along with traditional behaviors like celibacy. Malcolm capitalized on these teachings as he spread them through newspaper columns, the radio, and television. He did everything in his power to communicate these NOI messages and promote a program of economic self-sufficiency for blacks, the development of black-owned businesses, and the creation of a separate black nation carved out of the states of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. His national newspaper, Muhammad Speaks, was established in 1960 and accredited him with increasing NOI membership 60-fold from 1952 to 1963. His message grew more radical over time, exemplified by his Organization of Afro-American Unity founding rally on June 28, 1964 in which he persuaded blacks to abolish racism by any means necessary, including violence.
These militant proposals won over a large number of followers but, also opened doors for criticism by those who pegged his beliefs as hate speech, for surveillance by FBI agents who infiltrated the organization, and for opposition from less radical civil rights activists, like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Furthering his controversy, Malcolm's comment on president John F. Kennedy's assassination earned him a silence by Muhammed. In March 1964, he terminated his relationship with NOI, founded his own religious organization, the Muslim Mosque, Inc., and went on a pilgrimage to Mecca. He converted to traditional Islam, changed his name to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, and returned to America with a new outlook. After witnessing the harmony among Muslims of all races, he spoke to all people about his surprising, newfound hope for integration and peaceful revolution in the United States. However, relations between Malcolm and Muhammad remained volatile as many attempts were made to assassinate Malcolm X, until the attempt on February 21, 1965 proved successful.
Malcolm's work advanced the conversation of freedom in America in three clear ways; he spread the word around interracial cooperation, allowed people to question the effectiveness of nonviolent methods in gaining African-American freedom, and demonstrated the lengths all people will go to secure their own idea of freedom. It is clear that throughout the beginning of his activist work, he was more interested in black independence than integration. However, by catering to the militant ideals of some, progress was made in joining more people into the conversation. The United States was slowly making progress in terms of racial integration. For example, in 1954 the Supreme Court overturned the separate but equal doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, with the Brown v. Board of Education decision. This ruling was a step in the right direction for America but, it was not implemented socially and allowed for troubles like the 1956 signing of the Southern Manifesto, a doctrine declaring that Southern congressmen would do all they could to defend segregation, and the 1957 incident at Little Rock High School. For nine black students to enter school, Eisenhower needed to follow a court order and send federal troops to escort children into their school building.
It is understandable that many would view this marshal tactic as a symbol that more militant measures need to be used to produce results. Sending messages like this to the American people inevitably results in beliefs similar to those held by Malcolm X and his supporters. The condoning of violence in the case that it is necessary, demonstrated how far people would go to secure their idea of freedom. It is important to realize, however, that this was not the first time this message came about. Organizations like the Klu Klux Klan actively practiced violence as a means of preserving their own idea of freedom; however, because it was now officially proposed as a means for African Americans, Malcolm had shed light upon this debate. He proved that all human beings would fight for this right, America itself did so when battling Britain for freedom. Conversation regarding what freedom was, how it differed between and within races, and the right means of obtaining it, forced people to redefine what they believed.
This African-American leader's impact on American history is multifaceted. As Malcolm Little, he proved that African-Americans could succeed in being influential, simply by excelling in school after being told he could not. His legacy as Malcolm X, contributed to the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. He opened the doors for Black Power, a post-1966 rallying cry for a more militant civil rights movement and emphasis on African-American pride. The Black Panther Party, for example, advocated for armed self-defense in response to police brutality, a more militant and radical approach. His short-lived legacy as El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, however, symbolized the ever-changing ideals of America and the way personal, individual reactions affect masses. For Malcolm X, it made sense to follow Elijah Muhammad's teachings rather than align himself with a figure like Martin Luther King Jr. He discovered, sooner than Dr. King, that the institutionalized nature of over two centuries of segregation and racism would not be solved with simple nonviolent rallying. Malcolm's tactics targeted the angry mentality of his people and the social implication of trying to force segregated people into the same rooms as one another and expect a good outcome.
Malcolm felt that Dr. King's solutions worked in theory, but never played out in reality; therefore, this shift in disposition between the two and their followers was inevitable. However, after separating himself from NOI and challenging his own beliefs, Malcolm X reevaluated his stance, daring to explore the idea that he was wrong about a militant style. Although this last identity as El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz was short-lived, it is worth acknowledging for its symbolic power. Today, the United States is divided; today, claiming to be a Democrat or a Republican, not only speaks on one's political stance, but on one's character. The debates Americans normally have are ad hominem arguments, leaving no room for questioning or altering one's own views. Malcolm's final conversion to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz teaches that anger can blind human vision, but, America can actually have a bloodless revolution.
Cite this page
Introduction To Malcolm X And His Life. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Malcolm X Vs. Martin Luther King Jr.
In the eyes of many, there are no better examples of two people standing on the opposite side of a spectrum of any sort than Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X are both very important , most historical figures in the history of America, and the most iconic idols of the African American heritage. Being that these two had many different beliefs and different tactics in to spread across their message they both tried their best. Their works Letter from a Birmingham Jail and Ballot or the Bullet are both ways they tried to spread their message and how they used different strategies to do so. Both King and X use tone, philosophy, and ethos, logos, pathos to reach their goal.
Martin Luther King Jr's Letter from Birmingham Jail and Malcolm X's The Ballot or the Bullet are two very persuasive speeches just in their different ways. X is very blunt when speaking while King speaks very patiently and peacefully. Malcolm X gets straight to the point and just comes out and says blacks deserve rights and we will get them by any means. I'm nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that violence on me, then you've made me go insane. This is a radical approach. King, on the other hand takes a rational approach by pushing nonviolent protest and direct action. Malcolm X uses logos, ethos, and pathos in a more persuasive way The Ballot or the Bullet than King does in Letter from Birmingham Jail because he is more assertive with his tone and will do anything to meet his goals.
King and X both use ethos pathos, and logos to showcase their beliefs, civil rights movement, and their approaches. King starts by building his credibility by addresses the clergymen as friends by saying , Fellow Clergymen I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth sending the message showed that he is no less than them and they are no better than him. Martin Luther King then proceeds to justify his cause for protest and establishes reasons for the advancement of civil rights, logos .Specifically, he does so by raising doubts about the meaning of a just law and pointing out specific examples in which laws were unfair and unjust. King says,We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal.' It was 'illegal' to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am sure that, had I lived in Germany at the time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers. He then uses many allusions to multiple philosophers, and also religious leaders to get to the human emotions. in order to appeal to the human emotions King describes his disappointment in the church, The judgement of God is upon the church as never before. Malcolm X on the other hand uses these rhetorical devices in another way. Malcolm X has so much power as one of the leaders of the civil rights movement. He was a leader of the Nation of Islam for nearly a decade, and is a known as a Black Nationalist.
This credibility that he carries with him into his speech is immense, and it makes his audience more receptive to the arguments that he puts forth. One of the main points of Malcolm X's speech is to urge black Americans to come together and put all other differences aside. In order to show that he is completely invested in this cause, one of the first things Malcolm X does is talk about his religion. He openly admits that he is a Muslim and that he knows how this could cause some trouble with other members of the civil rights movement who do not share his religious views. Being that he opened his speech with claiming his religion shows how he was proud of being muslim and also African American, which leads to his pathos, and logos. Malcolm X emphasizes certain words in order to make the audience feel as though they have been failed by and made a fool of by the government. In his first argument about the white man taking over black neighborhoods, Malcolm X repeats the word control. Then you wonder why where you live is always a ghetto or a slum area. And where you and I are concerned, not only do we lose it when we spend it out of the community, but the white man has got all our stores in the community tied up. He then uses logos by explaining how the African American has suffered and only they know how it feels, no one else because they do not have to live through all the hardships. to convince people to accept Black Nationalism. He argues that changing your philosophy to black nationalism allows you to take action, and he uses a very logical thought process to make this claim: Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Both of the civil rights leaders used the rhetorical devices differently being because of their philosophy and also audience.
While MLK's letter addresses white moderates and Malcolm X's speech addresses members of the African American community, they each seek to improve the lives of African Americans by engendering shame in their audience. Dr. King makes his audience feel shame about not living up to both their religious and moral obligations to the movement. By invoking the biblical doctrines of Christianity and Judaism, the rhetoric of the letter makes the audience feel as though they are failing to live according to their faith. He begins to do this in the second paragraph of the letter. There, King connects himself with Christianity by revealing that he is the president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and affiliated with the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights. Such connections are important because they remind his reader that he shares their faith. He compares his plight to the Apostle Paul, nothing Like Paul, I must constantly respond to the Macedonian call for aid. He also makes an analogy of his plight to that of Jesus. When addressing accusations that he is an extremist, he asks Was not Jesus an extremist in love? With these two analogies, Dr. King aligns the Civil Rights Movement with the persecution of Jesus and the goals of St. Paul. For a religious audience, such an alignment would cause them to question any reservations that they have about the movement. Therefore, it is implicit that people who disagree with Dr. King's goals and methods are not living according to their faith. Their philosophy was very different because of their religion. Malcolm X is muslim and King is christian.
Both King and X use tone, philosophy, and ethos, logos, pathos to reach their goal. They used these to persuade the audience into looking into their civil rights and the mistreatment the African Americans lived through. The letter and speech are both strong pieces of persuasion, as i've mentioned before and was one of the main reasons why they were so iconic figures in the Black American history.
Cite this page
Malcolm X vs. Martin Luther King Jr.. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Influence of the American Dream
The 1920s were some of America's most thriving years. Sports such as boxing and baseball were a huge importance, women were striked with opportunities of a lifetime, the stock market was experiencing multiple tribulations, and the American Dream was the end goal of it all. Bootlegging was another major topic of interest in this time. Many citizens began selling alcohol illegally to make money and profit. This all helped contribute to the American Dream, the sole thing the vast majority of society was trying to achieve. Throughout his novel, The Great Gatsby, Frances Scott Fitzgerald shadows many situations highly influenced by the American Dream.
At the start of the 1920s, immigration was at its highest numbers ever in America's history (Hirshman). These immigrants came in large numbers such as millions. Living conditions weren't all the great in other countries, but they were just starting to boom in America. Citizens of other countries saw this and yearned for that kind of success. Many people in this time period wanted to live stress-free lives, so they figured the only way to do that was to travel to America. Many of these foreigners came to America with the hopes of earning more money than they were able to in their own countries. Most of them were unable to attain this goal. This led to many immigrants returning to their original homes. However, the ones who chose to stay hoped they were lucky enough to live out the American Dream.
Immigration was not the only reason the American Dream became so popular. People of America had already seen such a huge difference in their country once women were given the right to vote. Once women were able to recognize that politics had an impact on their daily lives just as much as it did on men's. They felt they had the right to have a part in politic (Benner). At first they weren't quick to jump social reform. Even though they had been given this right to vote, many people (mostly men) were not accepting of women having a bigger role in society. They still had little power. Eventually attitudes toward this new adjustment were slowly leaning towards women's favor. Benner says, Women focused on things such as child labor laws, prison reform, and their own personal jobs. It wasn't a normal thing if a woman was unmarried much less that women had their own jobs as well. The women had to work hard for what they believed was right and really put preeminence on the topic at hand. The Nineteenth Amendment changed society's view and understanding of women's place in humanity. This led to a huge impact and advantage for the people of America's happiness.
The American dream was mainly focused on attaining material objects. Paul A. Cantor quotes in his article, One got a good education in order to land a good job...which would provide the financial means of buying all the material components that seemed essential to the American. Not only was it desirable to have the nicest things, but having the ideal lifestyle with the ideal family was just as important. The suggestion of the American Dream gave individuals something to strive toward and a reason to endeavor to become prosperous, independent person in society. "The American Dream" has dependably been about the possibility of achievement (Diamond). She then goes on to say, ...it was a fantasy of correspondence, equity and popular government for the country. Society put all of their focus to accomplishing this vision that they felt was the key principle to America's turning point.
Although it may seem so simple, the American Dream is not generally so clear-cut an idea (Islam). It often included a perfect family and white picket wall (Islam). However, Gatsby did not live up to that standard. He was a single man who earned everything he owned all for himself (and Daisy of course); he wasn't working to support anyone else other than himself, he had no family to take care of. Fitzgerald wasn't exactly focused on shining light on how Gatsby lived out the American Dream, but more so how it looked to other people in West and East Egg. They saw him as some type of God because he was so extravagant. Gatsby can often be described as a baffling man who lives in a vast residence and tosses luxurious parties that are attended by a considerable number of people each Saturday night (Fitzgerald).
Cite this page
Influence Of The American Dream. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Fitzgerald’s Representation of the American Dream
The American dream remains as an image for expectation, accomplishment, and joy. Be that as it may, F Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby looks at the American dream from an alternate point of view, one that reveals insight into the individuals who bend these standards to their own self-centered dreams. Fitzgerald distributes Jay Gatsby as a man who takes the fantasy too far and ends up unfit to recognize his bogus existence of wealth from the real world. This interesting American tale portrays how society's desires for wealth and influence the untainted standards of the American vision. The narrative of Jay Gatsby is symbolic of the vanity of the American dream since he went through all his life living it, however, he never recognized what it intended to have genuine feelings of serenity and genuine satisfaction.
In The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby started life in a poor average workers family. He battled in World War 1 and after that went to Yale, at least to win the affection of Daisy Buchanan. For a similar reason, Gatsby was ready to make a fortune in rather repulsive ways by bootlegging and managing in phony bonds. In light of his rise to riches, people may consider Gatsby to be illustrative of the American dream. Since his terminal defeat, Fitzgerald demonstrates to his readers the occasionally bogus nature of that fantasy. Nick notices Gatsby's movement and position upon his feet, assuming its Gatsby himself. He stretched out his arms toward the dark water and distinguished nothing except a single green light, minute and far away. When I looked once more for Gatsby he had vanished. (Fitzgerald, 20) Gatsby is extending his arms towards the green light that is at the finish of Daisy's dock. For Gatsby, he thinks this light represents Daisy, his lost love. In the more extensive setting of the book and its contentions about the American dream, the green light can likewise be viewed as symbolizing money, achievement, and the past. The detachment of the green light is an imperative component of its imagery.
Besides Gatsby, the novel itself likewise has some importance to the American dream, especially during the 1920s, or the roaring twenties. As of now in America, the economy took off, which conveyed phenomenal dimensions of thriving to the country. Additionally, with World War 1 getting put to an end, individuals needed to make up for their pain from the war through wasting cash everywhere. This eventually led to rambling private gatherings and bars. Both of these patterns in America empowered American residents to wind up ridiculously wealthy over a brief timeframe. On account of this novel, Gatsby turned out to be wealthy by selling illegal drugs and afterward opened excessive gatherings periodically. This overall increase in America's wealth brought them closer to their own dreams.
As far as the American dream, Gatsby is truly and metaphorically the self-made man. Gatsby is living the past, stuck on the expectation that he may win Daisy's heart with his present way of life. He utilizes this to keep his fantasy of her alive, unfortunately, whatever is left of the world including Daisy, has proceeded onward. Despite the fact that Gatsby could be viewed as the living portrayal of the dream, we can perceive how formulated this genuinely is. He originates from a modest foundation to accomplish surprising riches. However, in any case, he can't buy or control time. He endeavors to erase the five years he was separated from Daisy and continue as nothing occurred in those years. Gatsby can't do this, so he builds his deepest desires of Daisy on illusions instead.
Despite the fact that Daisy and Jay originate from different foundations, they are similar on the grounds that they are both dependent on accomplishment. Their unrealistic desires and consistent need to look to the future keeps them from ever being happy again.
By using these characters, Fitzgerald demonstrates to the readers how the American dream can never fulfill anybody because the individual will, in every case, need more. The author is depicting that to be happy, people can't just have vast objectives, yet rather need to figure out how to value the present, rather than obsess on how incredible the future will be. Though Fitzgerald depicted the American dream as something uncommon that would never fulfill you, he demonstrated some faith in the thought and supported the theory that regardless of what class anyone originates from, it is constantly workable for them to make progress.
Cite this page
Fitzgerald's Representation Of The American Dream. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Classical Representation of the American Dream
The Classy Truth
The American Dream holds several different meanings. The pessimists believe the American Dream is unattainable. The optimists believe that success is achievable through hard work. And then there are the realists, who believe the American Dream exists only for the privileged, and therefore, has failed society. Through the Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald illustrates the early American Dream from the realist perspective, highlighting how wealth and social status are the necessary components behind fame and success. Similarly, the article, Is the American Dream Really Dead? by Carol Graham, emphasizes on the fact that the American Dream is luck based and only the wealthy can afford to make mistakes. Furthermore, Science Tests the American Dream, by Orion Jones links both pieces by explaining how regardless of hard work and intelligence, those who are wealthy are always more likely to succeed. Through the use of different techniques, the authors all argue that the pursuit of the American Dream is largely driven by social status, and the achievement of this dream ultimately ceases to exist for those who simply cannot afford it because integrity and diligence are not accounted for in the path to success.
The American Dream is not guaranteed, however, only those who have the luxury to pay for their mistakes are granted the comfort of stability and have sustainability to keep trying, unlike their poorer counterparts. Upon seeing Tom after several years, Nick finally got clarity as to who Tom really was as a person. Nick marvels to himself at the sight of Tom, I couldn't forgive him or like him, but I saw that what he had done was, to him, entirely justified. It was all very careless and confused. They were careless people, Tom and Daisy they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together and let other people clean up the mess they had made (Fitzgerald 129).
Nick explains how the Buchanans do not have to take responsibility for their actions. They are not admirable, but rather people who disrupt society and do not have to pay the consequences. Tom could easily buy whatever pleasures he seeked, such as Daisy's love, George's wife, and Daisy's innocence, at the expense of Gatsby's life. When Nick explains how Tom could retreat back into their money, he describes how Tom had his wealth to protect him from any and all shortcomings and provided a sense of security from the people he had ruined. To further prove this idea, Graham talks about how difficult it is for the poor to advance in the social hierarchy controlled by the very few at the top. She focuses on the idea of chance, and how the American Dream can be attained not by work ethic, but instead by favorable luck. She emphasizes, There are high costs to being poor in America, where winners win big but losers fall hard.
Indeed, the dream, with its focus on individual initiative in a meritocracy, has resulted in far less public support than there is in other countries for safety nets, vocational training, and community support for those with disadvantage or bad luck (Graham 2). Within her article, Graham explains how the poor often have to pay for the same opportunities the rich take for granted, such as education and connections. In the Great Gatsby, Tom could afford to have an affair, as well as have the confidence Daisy would not leave him because of his money. Gatsby spent his entire life working towards having the life Tom had, but even still, he could not reach the same level of prosperity. This goes to show how those who start at the bottom and try and work their way up still may never succeed because society forgives and rewards those who are wealthier because they can continue to pay for their mistakes.
Ethics and personality provide no leverage in the road to the American Dream, however, those who hold a greater social presence will always be prioritized, and therefore, one step closer to achieving the American Dream. Nick was born into a wealthy family with opportunities most people did not have. Nick remembers to himself when considering his place in society, I am still a little afraid of missing something if I forget that, as my father snobbishly suggested, and I snobbishly repeat, a sense of the fundamental decencies is parceled out unequally at birth (Fitzgerald 2). His dad explains, among money, personality is also distributed randomly, and not everyone can be a good person. It is equally likely a good person can be inherently evil, and even the poorest can be the most generous. However, it is important to consider in terms of the American Dream, wealth is the major propelling factor, and character comes second. Although Nick considers himself a genuinely honest person, he is not very wealthy, as sincerities and wealth are not linked.
In contrast, Tom, with racist views and unloyal intentions, is at the top of the social ladder with nothing at stake. Orion Jones also agrees with this idea of wealth determining success and follows it with a study. He quotes, The study found that being born with wealth is the best indicator of socio-economic success because, whether by paying college tuition or having a more exclusive set of professional connections, wealth is great at leveraging qualities like personality and intelligence. In other words, the American ethos cannot quite compensate for the American class system. ( Jones 1). Jones reiterates what Nick argues, as connections are priceless compared to personality. It is also important to recognize those of of the same status tend to cluster. Therefore, the rich only continue to expand their list of resources, while the poor have to struggle and pay for the same advantages. The American class system is the driving force between living and surviving. The only thing the class system considers is wealth and has no room for social niceties.
The fact that the American Dream is nearly unattainable with the core principles of hard work and a strong sense of morals, but possible with wealth and social influence only goes to show how the American Dream is full of false promises. Fitzgerald embodies this idea through the Great Gatsby showing how those who are born with influence succeed, and everyone else dies trying. Likewise, Graham depicts how failure is simply not an option, but the poor cannot afford second chances, and therefore the American Dream is dedicated to those already well enough to support themselves. Lastly, Jones touches on personality, a trait not deterred by wealth, which plays no role in moving up the social ladder. The American Dream does not represent the idea that, through hard work anything is possible, but rather, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Cite this page
Classical Representation Of The American Dream. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
American Dream by Fitzgerald
The American Dream is a national ethos for the people of the United States in which they misinterpret the idea of attaining your own version of success no matter your history or current status. The American Dream, for most people was to experience success and wealth within their lives, but not everyone can achieve what they desire the most. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald is a book set during the Roaring 20s in a fictional city in Long Island, off the East Coast of the United States. The three main characters Jay Gatsby, Daisy Buchanan and Nick Carraway each show a different interpretation for their American Dream throughout their own experiences.
Gatsby's interpretation of the American Dream was that through any amounts of wealth and power... happiness will always be attained. Buchanan's interpretation of the American Dream was to surround herself only amongst high quality material, to genuinely be wealthy, even if it does not make you actually happy with your life. However, Carraway's interpretation of the American Dream was that your desires would never truly come about since you would never able to overcome your past, try to better yourself but remain meek.
Jay Gatsby is more so familiar as the fabulously wealthy young man who lives in a gothic like mansion in West Egg. From a young age, James Gatz or more commonlyprofoundly known as Jay Gatsby, had grown up on a farm in North Dakota and had worked for a millionaire for some time in his early ages. His background is of many mysteries only to be truly known by Nick Carraway.
'It was a strange coincidence,' I said.'But it wasn't a coincidence at all'. 'Why not?' 'Gatsby bought that house so that Daisy would be just across the bay.' Then it had not been just the stars to which he had aspired on that June night. He came alive to me, delivered suddenly from the womb of his purposeless splendor. (Fitzgerald 78).
This shows how even though five years have passed since Gatsby was sent away to war and later on involved himself in business he believed he would win Daisy's love back from Tom through maybe great amounts of money. Gatsby had made huge efforts to be this close to Daisy and doesn't want to blow his chance to be with his former lover again. This helped influence his mentality to achieve wealthiness in his life. His interpretation of the American Dream really kicked off with the first appearance of the green light.
'I decided to call to him. Miss Baker had mentioned him at dinner, and that would do for an introduction. But I didn't call to him, for he gave a sudden intimation that he was content to be alone' he stretched out his arms toward the dark water in a curious way, and, far as I was from him, I could have sworn he was trembling. Involuntarily I glanced seaward' and distinguished nothing except a single green light, minute and far away, that might have been the end of a dock. When I looked once more for Gatsby he had vanished, and I was alone again in the unquiet darkness. (Fitzgerald 20-21)
From this we can see that Gatsby believed the greenlight situated at the end of Daisy's East Egg dock was all of Gatsby's hopes and dreams for the future. This shows how Jay Gatsby felt that he had a spectacular vision ahead after seeing the greenlight as it motivated him to try and relive part of his dreams with Daisy once more.
Daisy Buchanan is represented as one of the more determined characters who chased after high quality material and money. Tom and Daisy's common denominator was money and an upper class position in society. Daisy did not marry Gatsby even though they were in love because he was a poor man. Daisy not capable of loving again, turned to chase somebody else's wealth. Money might not make you happy, but it definitely doesn't hurt.
In June she married Tom Buchanan of Chicago with more pomp and circumstances than Louisville ever knew before. He came down with a hundred people in four private cars and hired a whole floor of the Seelbach Hotel, and the day before the wedding he gave her a string of pearls valued at three hundred and fifty thousand dollars. (Fitzgerald 75-76)
This proves very well how the pearls or money generally made her marriage with Tom better and how she didn't marry him exactly for his persona. Keeping in mind that Tom and Daisy Buchanan are known as having old money because it was inherited and never worked for by them. This connects back to Gatsby as a few moments later Daisy has an encounter with his mansion, Suddenly, with a strained sound, Daisy bent her head into the shirts and began to cry stormily. 'They're such beautiful shirts,' she sobbed, her voice muffled in the thick folds. 'It makes me sad because I've never seen such-such beautiful shirts before.' (Fitzgerald 92) This quote tells us how Daisy is extremely materialistic, even though Tom and Daisy are wealthy, Gatsby is very over-the-top as he practically is showing off everything he has gained which really catches Daisy's attention. Daisy's reason for her cries over the shirts is because by the time she reaches Gatsby's bedroom she is overwhelmed with the man that he had become, shown very distinctly based on his new wealth. Daisy can no longer contain her emotions with where Gatsby's life has taken him five years later. Daisy is a good person indeed, but from what we have seen she seems to just be taking advantage of whoever has more money.
Nick Carraway, by far the more deferential amongst all of the other people that live in both East and West Egg. Mr. Carraway comes from a family that by far worked very hard and got little in return, but this only built Nick's interesting/rare character into the story as he is perceived as the more standard Aamerican man living in the United States. I have an idea that Gatsby himself did not believe it would come, and perhaps he no longer cared. If that was true he must have felt that he had lost the old warm world, paid a high price for living too long with a single dream. (Fitzgerald 161) Nick presumes that the American Dream is inanimate as you cannot overcome your past. This refers back to Nick's past as he was raised in a lower class family which makes him believe he will never be as equal as the people of East Egg. Nick Carraway doesn't have an actual American Dream, instead he has just thoughts of what could possibly be. Alongside this, Nick seems to focus on Gatsby towards the end of the story more than he would of himself as he states, But all this part of it seemed remote and unessential. I found myself on Gatsby's side and alone. (Fitzgerald 164) This quote sums up Nick's outlook as it shows that Gatsby is only safe from Nick's growing resentment. Nick is in pure disgust for all the other upper class for what happened to Jay Gatsby. Nick Carraway was by far the responsible type of man in this story, he always kept it realistic with everybody which is why he chooses the people that he would want to be surrounded by despite his non-wealth compared to others.
The American Dream is a national ethos for the people of the United States in which they misinterpret the idea of attaining your own version of success no matter your history or current status. Within the story, each character played a certain role in their own road to the American Dream whether it actually happened for them or not. At the end neither Tom or Gatsby really get Daisy, she kind of just took in all of the attention that she was getting and was satisfied enough with that. However, somebody like Nick Carraway did get a certain American Dream, to help others out even when you are not at your best. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald was a book set during the Roaring 20s in a fictional city in Long Island, off the East Coast of the United States that was focused a lot on accomplishing the American Dream aside from protecting those you loved the most.
Cite this page
American Dream By Fitzgerald. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Feminist Criticism in the Great Gatsby
The focus on how women are depicted in literature is crucial and it is seen in the works of Fitzgerald in his book “The Great Gatsby”, for it was one of the many ideas that were discussed in his book. Furthermore, the idea of the feminist perspective is that it deals with the traditional impression of a man as the commanding and influencing subject who is thought to represent humanity since it is depicted that the male had overpowered females and prevented them from recognizing their own potential. The story can be appreciated for the way it has portrayed women, as the general narrative is enhanced and allows the reader to praise it for its literary value through feminist criticism. Therefore, in the book “The Great Gatsby” the feminist criticism centers on the general idea of the female experience, the differences between women and men, and the relationships between both genders.
In light of this, Fitzgerald wrote about this issue with awareness of the early twentieth century regarding female experience. Moreover, the women in “The Great Gatsby”, specifically Daisy, were seen as attractive young wives who were not only viewed as tools by men but also not heard or understood for their potentials. This idea was stated when Daisy bore a child and discovered that the child was a girl, she cried and said, ‘“All right, I’m glad it’s a girl. And I hope she’ll be a fool-that’s the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool”’ (Fitzgerald 17). These words spoken by her reveal a lot about her character. In the book, it was viewed that Daisy was alone, but not a fool since at that time the social environment didn’t show any appreciation to the intellect of women.
On the other hand, this observation can also be viewed to be a sarcastic comment because although she is referring to the social values and what they hold in her era, she doesn’t confront them. For this reason, she portrays those values as her own since she thinks that girls or females can only have fun and survive in the world if only they were attractive fools. Also, in this story Daisy is depicted to be the “American golden girl,” this was shown when Gatsby said, ‘“Her voice is full of money”’ (Fitzgerald 120). To explain, the description of Daisy’s voice represents her personality, for on the outside, she seems to be alluring and glamorous, but on the inside, she is both shallow and disloyal. Despite all that, she speaks like the sound of success, which is a “golden” that makes her enchanting to men.
Fitzgerald shows the difference between both men and women by giving readers perspicacity into the men who agree with the female illusion created by society, and how they demoralize them. Fitzgerald explores the irony that men exploit their idealized women. This idea is supported when Gatsby and Daisy were conversing together. “He began to talk excitedly to Daisy, denying everything, defending his name against accusations that had not been made. But with every word she was drawing further and further into herself” (Fitzgerald 134).
Gatsby’s life here seems to be based on the idea of getting validated and approved of himself and his actions throughout his relationship with Daisy. A feminist would see that he is trying to oppress her here, for it’s like Gatsby is trying to control and overpower Daisy by trying to keep her from leaving him while she is trying to escape him. Additionally, there seems to be a focus on individuals who also break the social standards that were set up by society. To clarify, Nick, the narrator of the story, reflects on the relationship between Tom and Myrtle and Daisy. Tom is abusing Myrtle Whilst dominating one overpowering Daisy. With attention to what happened in the following, “Making a short deft movement, Tom Buchannan broke her nose with his open hand” (Fitzgerald 37).
The only problem to happen was that he had done so in front of an audience showing that it was a social standard in a messed up system created by the society to get a male to dominate a female, Fitzgerald is using his critique by showing that it would seem out of control if she was physically abused in front of people back then. Tom is using his physical and economic power over both Myrtle and Daisy to overpower them, showing that the women in this text have no power, even when trying to gain it.
Not to mention, Fitzgerald also showed a great emphasis on the relationship between males and females. With this in mind, one has to think of one of the main characters of the story, Nick Carraway who gave a biased view on the relationship between women and men, and the chain of command regarding relationships. This relates to how Tom had a mistress and Daisy was aware of what happened but didn’t do anything to fix the problem. For that, the narrator Nick was disgusted and surprised by this since he thought that Daisy was to take her daughter and pack her things and leave him, but was surprised to know that she didn’t act on it though.
Despite that Nick seems to be unable to relate to Jordan Baker on the same level regarding how she interprets morals and ethics in simplicity, specifically about her playing golf and how she “cheated”, without thinking that he too thinks this way. This is revealed when Nick and Jordan converse near the end of the story, ‘“You threw me over the phone. I don’t give a damn about you now, but it was a new experience for me, and I felt a little dizzy for a while. I thought you were an honest, straightforward person, I thought it was your secret pride”’ (Fitzgerald 177). ‘“I’ma five years too old to lie to myself and call it honor”’ (Fitzgerald 177). This just shows how biased he is, for he too was dishonest since he was still half in love with her in the end.
In conclusion, Fitzgerald overall presentation of women and men in the early 1920s is calloused and unflattering. The society was based on men disempowering women and degrading them, and how difficult it was for a woman to survive in the 1920s because they had to act like beautiful fools and allow men to distinguish their potentials, and how the relationships were false and based on lies and putting masks on for one another. This book targeted an issue that showed how women all fell under the label of “beautiful fools” who were disempowered by men despite them having potentials that were far bigger than those of the men in that society back then.
Works Cited
- Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. Charles Scribner's Sons, 1925.
Cite this page
Feminist Criticism In The Great Gatsby. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
What is the American Dream?
Imagine coming home from your dream job, driving an amazing car to your house in a wealthy neighborhood, to have your kids run up to the door to greet you. Wouldn't we all want that? This is the American Dream I hold most valuable. To be able to live a comfortable, successful life, and to having a great relationship with your family
.
To begin with, one of the key parts of the American Dream for me is to live comfortably, and have a successful life. In The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Nick Carraway lives in a small house on West Egg squeezed between two gigantic mansions. He describes it as, An eyesore, but it was a small eyesore and [in] the consoling proximity of millionaires.(pg. 5) While Nick's relatively small house was enough for him to live comfortably, Gatsby's house was a different story. Nick says this about the house, (if you can even call it that) The one on my right was a colossal affair by any standard- it was a factual imitation of some Hotel de Ville in Normandy It was Gatsby's mansion. (pg. 5) The difference between Nick and Gatsby was what they considered to be comfortable. Gatsby, a bootlegger, made so much money that he threw lavish parties every week, for anyone to come to. On the other hand, Nick, a bondsman, was just content in his small eyesore. Both were successful and comfortable in their own way.
In addition to physical comfort, a great family relationship is the other essential part to my American Dream. In The Great Gatsby, we see how Jay Gatsby ruined his relationship with his family in order to attain his American Dream. When Gatsby met Daisy, the woman that he would fall in love with, is when his dream of riches started. He first met her in Louisville, while he was stationed at Camp Taylor. Gatsby is sent into World War 1 and Daisy was going to wait for him. Daisy, however, could no longer stand the wait and married Tom Buchanan. Gatsby hears about this and is devastated. Eventually he ends up in New York, right across the bay from Daisy's house.
When he gets to finally have Daisy in his arms he says to her, If it wasn't for the mist we could see your home across the bay. You always have a green light that burns all night at the end of your dock. Daisy put her arm through his abruptly but he seemed absorbed in what he had just said. Possibly it had occurred to him that the colossal significance of that light had now vanished forever.(92-93) Sometimes your dreams aren't what they appear to be. Gatsby had left his family behind to chase after what he thought was true love for Daisy when in all actuality, he was only in love with the idea of her. By reading The Great Gatsby, I've realized I need to value you my family and realize it's more important than any dream.
The American Dream is what you believe it to be, everyone has different dream. As I've shown above the my American Dream is to live a comfortable and successful life, and have a great family relationship. After reading The Great Gatsby, I now have some examples to help guide me on my journey to my American Dream.
Cite this page
What Is The American Dream?. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Men’s Dominance over Women
The 1920’s was the year that everything changed for women. They gained more freedom when the 19th amendment was passed and women had the right to vote. The 1920s was the year that the word feminism became more used and brought up. Feminism is a political/social movement striving to gain equality of sexes. In the book The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, women are seen as objects in the eyes of male characters. Fitzgerald creates a misogynist perspective through Daisy and Myrtle, by making them dependent on men. The Great Gatsby is a book that explores the want/need males have for happiness and wealth through the American dream. While the women are portrayed in a anti feminist way.
In The Great Gatsby men have physical dominance over women. Women are seen as silly dreamers, incapable of intelligent thoughts and realistic goals. In the book Tom uses his physical, financial, and social dominance to abuse Myrtle and Daisy. The way he treats Daisy brings her to think, “that the best thing a girl can be in this world, [is] a beautiful little fool” (Fitzgerald, 17). During the novel it was said that, “If [Tom] left the room for a minute, she'd look around uneasily, and say: ‘Where's Tom gone?’”. This quote said by Nick about Daisy displays a misogynist example of how women need men.Daisy is weak, she knows women are known in society for being foolish. The only role for women is to be a mother, a wife, or an image for men to want in the 1920s.
In The Great Gatsby Jordan Baker is a woman portrayed as being incapable of being successful. Her career as a professional golfer is built off cheating at tournaments. “ At her first big golf tournament there was a row that nearly reached the newspaper a suggestion that she had moved her ball from a bad lie in the semi-final round. The thing approached the proportions of a scandal then died away. A caddy retracted his statement, and the only other witness admitted that he might have been mistaken”(Fitzgerald 57). This quote shows how Jordan cheats during a golf tournament and gets caught and pays off the caddy. With Fitzgerald writing that he's implying that she would be incapable of being successful without cheating. In the book Nick mentions that he, “…was flattered to go places with her, because she was a golf champion, and everyone knew her name.”(Fitzgerald 57). That shows that not only did Jordan make a name for herself but men, like Nick, were interested and flattered to be around her. Jordan is only accepted for her success as a golfer because of her masculine like qualities, but since she’s a woman, Fitzgerald implies she must have cheated her way to the top because there is no way she could share equal success.
Fitzgerald writes Myrtle Wilson as a character who lives part of her life in an abusive marriage, and the other part as Tom’s mistress. Myrtle is talked down to throughout the book and is only seen as an object to Tom. She's described as being older and unattractive and, according to Nick, obnoxious and loud. Myrtle is used by men through physical, mental, and emotional abuse. On page 37 Myrtle and Tom are having an argument and Nick says, “Some time toward midnight Tom Buchanan and [Myrtle] stood face to face discussing, in impassioned voices, whether [Myrtle] had any right to mention Daisy's name. ‘Daisy! Daisy! Daisy!" shouted Mrs. Wilson. "I'll say it whenever I want to! Daisy! Dai ––’ Making a short deft movement, Tom Buchanan broke her nose with his open hand.” Myrtle is physically harmed for her boldness and for challenging Tom. It shows anti feminism because the second Myrtle tried to break out and speak for herself against Tom he physically hurt her.
The Great Gatsby follows a misguided social norm that men are to have dominance over women, not equality. Women are talked down to as objects. In The Great Gatsby, we see Daisy, Myrtle and Jordan as dependent upon male figures. Men are showed as hard workers, while women aren't successful. The women in The Great Gatsby are described as helpless and dependent on men because they are not allowed to pursue their own dreams.
Cite this page
Men's Dominance Over Women. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
To what Extent does the Censorship in Fahrenheit 451 Affect the Freedom of its Characters
Fahrenheit 451 is a dystopian novel written by Ray Bradbury which was published in 1953. I strongly believe that the censorship portrayed in Fahrenheit 451 greatly limits the freedom of its characters and thus the aforementioned censorship would be disastrous in our world, throughout this analysis I will back up this statement. The problem of censorship is extremely prominent throughout the plot of the story as Guy Montag, the lead character is a fireman who burns books and literature in a futuristic dystopian portrayal of America in order to avoid the majority of the population developing conflicting opinions and offensive ideals. The society in Fahrenheit 451 is brainwashed by government run TV channels which continuously play bland unmeaningful shows along with the Seashell Radio sets playing constantly around them.
Guy Montag works under the guidance of his Captain, Beatty who is a fireman himself and leads the firefighters to their missions of burning books and pieces of literature wherever an alarm is set off. However Guy Montag grows tired of his life as a fireman as he continues to increasingly contemplate his life and what he is doing with it further intensified when Clarisse, a teenage girl asks him if he is truly happy. Furthermore Montag watches in a recent book extinguishing mission as an old lady chose to be burned alive along with her books which clearly shows how much meaning literature had in her life and how much freedom it gave her however he also notices Beatty quoting a book on the very same day. This pushes him over the edge and he decides to read a stash of stolen books from which he wanted to find some sort of enlightenment and freedom in his life. Eventually Captain Beatty explained to Montag the importance of Censorship and how the people have brought this fate upon themselves by getting offended too easily and starting riots from differing opinions so as a result more and more authors became hesitant to write freely. Beatty concluded that the way things are now is essential to keep the peace in the modern world so burning books was the best option to avoid conflicting opinions. This however contrasts what an old English professor named Faber teaches Montag so he realizes the importance of books and the freedom of acting upon the detailed information of the certain book.
Eventually Montag's wife turns him in to Beatty and the firemen as she also shares a hatred for books. However within the conflict Montag kills Beatty and escapes with Faber to the land of the intellectuals who memorize literature and pass it down each generation, this can be analysed as a way to keep the freedom flowing in a otherwise censor heavy world. Using this method the idea of countering the censorship is still valid and eventually in the near future if the intellectuals are able to rebuild civilization then the strict censorship will disappear and freedom of human speech will arise once again. But why does all of this matter? The idea of freedom has long kept humans in our world and in the world of literature hopeful, feeling free gives us a sense of strength and hope whether it may be true or false. That is why when Beatty uses censorship to control the citizens of Fahrenheit 451 in some citizens this creates the feeling of restriction, hopelessness and overall domination by a superior, I will further inquire into how exactly this restriction I have mentioned affects the characters in the novel and why exactly would it restrict them. Along with that so that we can have a better understanding of the restriction I will compare us humans in the real world to the characters in the novel. Censorship, freedom of speech, equality and human rights are all extremely prevalent parts of our society, they control our everyday lives more than we care to think and if we even lost one of them our lives would be completely different. Understanding the importance of freedom and the effects of censorship in our life will help us connect on a deeper level with the characters of Ray Bradbury's novel.
Cite this page
To What Extent Does the Censorship in Fahrenheit 451 Affect the Freedom of its Characters. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Bradbury’s Use of Symbolism in Dystopian Novel Fahrenheit 451
Literary devices are techniques of expression that authors use to convey meaning to their story. When used with proper skill, these devices can bring copiousness and clarity to the content (Duckart). Certain literary devices can be applied to both fiction and nonfiction books. This essay will show how Ray Bradbury, the author of Fahrenheit 451, uses symbolism throughout his novel to provide the reader with a better grasp at deeper understanding and meaning to his novel. More often than not, symbolisms are not obvious and are easily looked over; however, when analyzed in detail, they add new and important dimensions of meaning to the story line. There are many symbolisms used throughout Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, in this paper I will discuss his use of symbolism for fire, river, blood, hearth, sieve, phoenix and mechanical hound. Some of the fore mentioned symbols are very well known to those whom have read the novel more than once. To others, they are milder, which cause individuals to easily miss the connection upon an initial reading of the story. I know I missed many, if not all, literary devices when I was assigned the novel as a summer reading project before I began the eighth grade. Each of these symbolisms have a deeper meaning that we will discuss in greater detail throughout this paper.
Bradbury's novel is based on books being burned, I felt it was only right to open my paper with the analyzation and discussion of Bradbury's symbolism of fire, which is used throughout the entire novel. Bradbury opens his novel with an impressive thought that is sure to captivate many readers, 'It was a pleasure to burn' (1). Montag took pleasure to witness things burn. To see things blackened and change symbolizes darkness and eradication. The opening section characterizes the contentment Montag experiences while burning books. He is passionate of the extravaganza caused by burning and seeing properties change by the fire. So much to the point that he even has an adoration for the smell of kerosene, which he recounts to Clarisse, 'Kerosene', he said because the silence had lengthened, is nothing but perfume to me' (3).
Fire is used to symbolize destruction; however, as the story line evolves, the meaning of the fire begins to shift from destruction which then leads to revival in the end ("SYMBOLISM AND THE DYSTOPIAN TRADITION IN RAY BRADBURY'S FAHRENHEIT 451"). Fires had previously been an enemy of mankind, but is now the dominant image of Montag's life. Mr. Dolton, a writer at Read the World states that as Montag's character evolves from beginning to end, so does too the meaning of the fire (Dolton). In the end, what once symbolized destruction translates to freedom, as Montag is freed from his oppressor, Beatty. He is also freed from the oppression of not being able to gain knowledge and read books. Moreover, although fire has two very different meaning for both halves of the book, there is also a meaning that fire takes upon for the entire book that does not change. In both parts of the novel fire is what helps and shelters the human race, at least which is what is supposed to be inferred.
In addition to the fire symbolism, a deeper connection and meaning is given to kerosene. During Montag's first conversation with Clarisse, he mentions his satisfaction with the smell of kerosene, which he states can never seem to be washed off (3). This mention of kerosene can be a mild symbolism of the knowledge and humanity that Guy has destroyed, which according to Mr. Dolton cannot be washed away or forgotten. Additionally mentioned by Dr. Kipling, a current educator that has majored in Literature and History states that kerosene was a daily reminder to Guy Montag of all that he carries out a highly immoral function from which he cannot easily escape (Kipling).
Proceeding to the next of Bradbury's selection of symbols, another that highly stood out to me in this novel is water. Water, just as fire carries varying meaning in real life, as well as in literature. The escape through the river symbolizes Montag's liberation. Throughout the novel water is used to contrast fire and, in a way, to signify good and evil (Kipling). Rivers in some faiths or belief systems are ceremonially used for carriage in the afterlife, according to a google search I began at the start of my research. Additionally, water is used for baptisms in array of religions which is believed to cleanse one from sins. The river changes Montag. After floating for a prolonged period of time Montag has an epiphany, he realizes that he should never burn anew. He emerges from the river a man washed from his past. Montag is now liberated from the old chains and shackles of his former life. Additionally, the forest which the river flows through further indicates humanity before sophistication or its development (Dolton).
Cite this page
Bradbury's Use of Symbolism in Dystopian Novel Fahrenheit 451. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Comparison and Contrast: Fahrenheit 451
The novels Fahrenheit 451, The Pedestrian by Ray Bradbury, and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut have a variety of similiarities and differences in their portrayals of futuristic societies. One way how Fahrenheit 451 is similar to The Pedestrian is that the main characters in both stories go through the feeling of loneliness and isolation in the society without anybody by your side. In Fahrenheit 451, Montag felt very lonely and isolated because he was unable to pursue a profession and a lifestyle he took pride in because he never received support from his wife. It wasn’t just Montag either, the society spent too much of its time inside isolated, and if you were somebody who refuses to uphold to the scheme of a “perfect” society like Montag, then you too, were alone in the society of Fahrenheit 451.
In The Pedestrian, the main character (Leonard Maze) had nobody to accompany him or make feel more than what he did in that moment of time. He was always unhappy of continuously staying inside the darkness, so he went outside for a walk by himself every evening in order to make himself feel better. Fahrenheit 451 is also similar to “Harrison Bergeron” because both societies have technology set up in a form that people utilize that is not very healthy and well for them. In “Harrison Bergeron,” the government created devices that limited people from thinking what they didn’t want them to think and made them forget anything important they were thinking about so that everybody was on the same thinking level. This prevented people from becoming better than one another because they couldn’t think deeper and beyond others. In Fahrenheit 451, the television was used as a weapon of mass destruction against the people.
The television which is also known as the parlor, makes it so that it reduces the human mind into a mush, with the regularity very similar to oatmeal. This piece of technology was bent towards keeping every individual’s mind distracted and away from intellctual activites by playing meaningless shows that continues to go on which keeps people from getting smart enough to think about why things are the way they are right now. The society has been totally consumed into nothing but the televisions and media, that they have disregarded their appreciation of nature and dosen’t bother to go out and explore the world beyond the stupid things their television and media provides for them all the time. All citizens in both societies have become established to spend all of their time indoors. The authors of Fahrenheit 451, The Pedestrian, and “Harrison Bergeron” find a point and exaggerate it in order for the audience to be able to see the outcome of these socities if a change isn’t made.
On the contrary, a multitude of differences can also be found throughout the novels of Fahrenheit 451, The Pedestrian, and “Harrison Bergeron.” A way how Fahrenheit 451 and “Harrison Bergeron” differ is that in “Harrison Bergeron,” the government has a desire for everybody to be exactly the same in all aspects which includes. No one should be smarter than one another, and no one is supposed to look better than anyone(if so, they had to wear masks to hide it). The government in Fahrenheit 451 also wishes for everyone to be the same in all aspects. However, they do not purposely try to make them ugly or control their thinking so that they don’t think of something that they don’t want them to.
Cite this page
Comparison and Contrast: Fahrenheit 451. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Comparative Analysis of the Autobiography of Malcolm X
Malcolm X is regarded as one of the most prominent figures of the civil rights era during the 1950's and 60's. His controversial views challenged the mainstream civil rights movement as he opposed integration as championed by MLK and urged his followers to challenge white aggression by any means necessary. His positive impact, however, cannot be ignored as he raised the self-esteem of black Americans, reconnected them with their African heritage and spread Islamic faith throughout black communities. In the years prior to his assassination, Malcolm X shared his life story to prominent African American author Alex Haley. His journey from Omaha, Nebraska to Boston, Harlem and eventually Mecca is outlined in Haley's Autobiography of Malcolm X (1965). In this essay, I will explore Malcolm X's autobiography as it is applied to other theoretical models regarding race namely, W.E.B Dubois's concept of Double Consciousness from his collection of essays Souls of Black Folks (1903) and Omi and Winant's theory on Racial Formation from their book Racial Formation in the United States (1986).
More specifically, X's failure to parallel woman's rights with black Americans rights necessitates a modern extension to incorporate all minority groups in Dubois's model of Double Consciousness??”thus further understanding Black Americans identity struggle. Additionally, X's description of black oppression at the hands of white America illuminates the absence of white dominated racial oppression and a racial hierarchy in Omi and Winant's racial formation theory. In extending Dubois's model and adding critical discussion to Omi and Winant's theory, can one to better understand the struggle of minority groups in America.
I will first explore X's views towards women in my application of his autobiography to Dubois's double consciousness. Throughout his Autobiography, Malcolm X's apparent sexist and stereotypical attitude towards women undermines his legitimacy as a civil rights leader as he fails to parallel woman's rights to black Americans rights. In the beginning of his autobiography, X's gender confirming stereotypes towards his parents are viewed. When describing, X comments on his masculine traits of bigness, toughness and strength. He goes on to claim he admires his father's occupation as a preacher and nationalist.
Whereas, when describing his mother, Malcolm X states: My mother at this time seemed to be always working cooking, washing, ironing, cleaning, and fussing over us eight children (86) In these descriptions, X's views are the traditionally binary image of a mother who cooks and an admirable, masculine father. X further solidifies these binary roles by justifying his father's physical abuse. In response to his mother's abuse at the hands of his father, X says, An educated woman, I suppose, can't resist the temptation to correct an uneducated man (82). In X's eyes, his mother education is a threat to a man's sense of manhood and her talking-back permits abuse. By justifying his father's abuse, X subconsciously contradicts his entire argument about the injustice by white society.
He fails to see how his own fathers physical abuse is as detrimental to black society as white Americas continual hatred and discrimination. Another instance of X's failure to juxtapose women's rights with black Americans rights is his description of his relationship with Laura and the cause for her societal downfall. X initially describes his girlfriend Laura as bright and having a promising future, but goes on to clarify that after their relationship she became an alcoholic, drug addict, and prostitute. The startling fact regarding their relationship comes in X's inclination that she had subsurface potential (148) to become a prostitute and he wished had known then [what] to look for in Laura's face (148) before dating her. In these descriptions, X comments that Laura, who initially had a promising future, had some internal tendency to become a prostitute and alcoholic.
X completely overlooks the societal and economic pressures that women in deprived communities face which causes them to turn to prostitution. Ironically, a majority of the novel is spent analyzing X's social and economic reasons as to why black men are forced to hustle, pimp and engage in criminal activities but he fails to do the same for women in a similar predicament. This description of Laura's downfall in the autobiography seems to be that racism of the dominating white society turns the black American man into a life of crime, but some internal tendency turns the black American women into prostitution. X's validation towards his mother's abuse and incorrect implications of Laura's future demonstrate that civil rights of minority groups, in Malcolm X's journey, must be extended to include women.
In understanding X's failure to parallel black rights to women's rights, can a modern extension to Dubois's double consciousness to include other minority and discriminated-against groups be investigated. This extension better allows a critical understanding of the plight of minority groups as they struggle with self-identification in America. The concept of Double Consciousness is first introduced in civil rights activist W.E.B Dubois's collection of essays, Souls of Black Folk (1903). To Dubois, Double consciousness represents the sensation of twoness felt by black Americans as they struggle with their black identity and their identity as seen by the white American majority. From my previous discussion on X's neglect for woman rights, one can see that Dubois's theory of Double Consciousness can be extended to analyze the identity of women living in a patriarchal society.
Like Black Americans oppression at the hands of a white majority, women are oppressed at the hands of a patriarchal society. In his autobiography, X's mother is oppressed by a patriarchal society where domestic violence is permitted. Additionally, X fails to identify the societal pressures that cause his girlfriend, Laura, to turn to prostitution, yet clearly provides an analysis to why he was forced to hustle in Boston and New York. X's failure to incorporate a third identity overlooks. In fact, some recent social analysts have extended double consciousness to not only a third identity, but multiple identities to apply to all minority groups. Some examples in recent events could be the immigrant asylum seeker at the US Southern border or transgender students requesting access to gender inclusive school facilities. This multi-consciousness accurately portrays the self-image difficulties of all minority groups in America and a better understanding of race relations can occur.
In a similar fashion to my analysis of double consciousness, I will first examine the impact of white oppression and racial hierarchy in Malcolm X's autobiography, then apply these instances to justify their inclusion in Omi and Winant's Racial Formation Theory. In the beginning of his autobiography, X describes the unfortunate predicament of Black Americans: Back when I was growing up, the "successful" Lansing Negroes were such as waiters and bootblacks. To be a janitor at some downtown store was to be highly respected (8). In X's community, janitors and waters were considered elite and respected occupations, even though they made minimal wages.
This quote comments on a racial hierarchy present in the black community, with the black elite as janitors and the less elite as waters. In a larger scheme, it demonstrates that black Americans were at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. As with be further explored, we soon find out who is at the top. As the autobiography progresses, X describes his primary school years. In his descriptions, X states that he is vastly more intelligent than his fellow white peers yet, when consulting with his white History teacher about his aspirations to become a lawyer, his teacher responds: A lawyer??”that's no realistic goal for a nigger. You need to think about something you can be. You're good with your hands ”making things. Everybody admires your carpentry shop work. Why don't you plan on carpentry? (38). Here, X's white history teacher dissuades X from pursuing a higher education because of his race and encourages him to instead pursue a more realistic goal as a carpenter. This further exemplifies that black Americans fit into the bottom of the racial hierarchy as carpenters and not at the top as lawyers. Furthermore, this message in coming from his white teacher, represents a larger picture where white authoritative figures (and in general white America) oppress black Americans. A similar instance regarding white America's oppression and evidence for a racial hierarchy is apparent in X's predicament of taking shelter in a Harlem nightclub:
In one sense, we were huddled in there, bonded together in seeking security and warmth and comfort from each other, and we didn't know it. All of us??”who might have probed space, or cured cancer, or built industries??”were, instead, black victims of the white man's American social system. (93)
In this quote X is indirectly referring to his acquaintances such as Sammy the Pimp, whose considerable business skills might have helped him build industries instead of a pimping empire. Similarly, his other acquaintance West Indian Archie's could have used his photographic memory and quick math skills to probe space or cure cancer and not in gambling rackets. X concludes with the fact that they are victims of the white man's American social system. This quote explores the racial hierarchy of America as Black Americans are forced to take shelter in a nightclub against the difficult conditions of a Harlem ghetto and could not escape these difficult conditions as they were victims of the white man's social system. Once again, X and his friends are at the bottom of America's racial hierarchy as they seek shelter in a ghetto and are limited in their prospects of achieving a better life because of the white man's American social system. In a critical analysis of race relations in America, the topic of a racial hierarchy and racial oppression at the hands of white America is an important subject to explore, yet is blatantly absent from widely received Racial Formation Theory.
The additional topics of white America's systematic oppression and racial hierarchy, as outlined in Malcom X's autobiography, need be included in Omi and Winant's Racial Formation Theory to accurately describe racial history and race relations in America. To briefly summarize, Racial Formation Theory was first introduced by Professors of Sociology Michael Omi at UC Berkeley and Howard Winant at UC Santa Barbara. Omi and Winant coauthored Racial Formation Theory in the United States (1986) as a means of dissect and understand racial categories and racial projects throughout America. One pitfall of their theory is that they never address and completely leave out the importance of white Americans, European Americans and white elites in their systematic oppression. They only rarely use the term whites. In their only discussion on the white race, Omi and Winant state:
We expect people to act out their apparent racial identities; indeed, we become disoriented when they do not. The black banker harassed by police while walking in casual clothes through his own well-off neighborhood, the Latino or white kid rapping in perfect Afro patois, the unending faux pas committed by whites who assume that the non-white colleagues are less qualified persons hired to fulfill affirmative action guidelines.
In another conversation about the white race, Omi and Winant state Whites tend to locate racism in color consciousness and find its absence color-blindness. In these very brief discussions, they only address micro-level questions about racial identity and white racial views, but completely leave out white America's role in perpetuating racial oppression. This counters X's claim that he was dissuaded from become a lawyer by his white teacher. And also counters the fact that X and his acquaintances were forced to take shelter in a nightclub and not escape the difficult conditions of Harlem's ghettos due to white America. Another important topic that is never mentioned in Omi and Winant's discussion of racial projects and racial oppression is the racial hierarchy in America. In fact, throughout their entire description of racial formation theory they only use the term hierarchy once and fail to further develop this idea. However, this concept is readily apparent in X's autobiography in his description of the respected and successful occupations of Lansing Negros. X also refers to a racial hierarchy when he describes potential futures of his acquaintances in Harlem that are shut down at the hands of white America. The idea of a racial hierarchy??”with the white man at the top and the black man at the bottom??”need be included in an accurate discussion of Racial Formation Theory.
Only then can Omi and Winant conceptualize the Black Americans struggle. Without the additional of these two subjects, Racial Formation Theory fails to describe white Americans role in a perpetuating a racialized society and racial hierarchy.
A close reading of X's autobiography demonstrates that Malcolm X failed to incorporate the rights of women in dis description of an oppression culture. The necessary addition of women in X's autobiography as an extension of Dubois's double consciousness allows a superior understanding of self-image and identity struggles minority groups in America face. Without this extension, not only woman, but all minority groups are, Additionally, X's autobiography implies a racial hierarchy as realizes the impossibility of being a lawyer, recognizes the wasted potential of his friends in Harlem and comments on the occupational limitations in Lansing. This addition is necessary in accurately understanding a racial hierarchy at the hands of white America.
Cite this page
Comparative Analysis of the Autobiography of Malcolm X. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X
I know that a lot of people are familiar with the name malcolm little or better known as malcolm x. Not many people know the background on the name malcolm x instead of malcolm little.
Well the background on that is little was inherited from his ancestors when they were slaves. So malcolm ended up changing his last name to x because it really symbolizes his african name el-hajj Malik el-shabazz. Malcolm x was a activist and outspoken public voice of the black muslim faith,and challenged the mainstream of the civil rights movement and the nonviolent pursuit of integration by Martin Luther King jr.
Malcolm and Martin also urged followers to be able to defend themselves against white aggression like the klu klux klan (kkk) by any means necessary. Malcolm had developed a strong mistrust for the kkk at a young age But anyways you might know at least one when they burned his childhood home down and accused malcolm's father of burning his own house down.
You might know some things that he is most known or popular for like being a african american leader who was a important key spokesman for the nation of islam epitomized the Black power philosophy.
Somethings people don't usually know is that malcolm played a role in the civil rights movement. In the early 1960s he became frustrated with all the non-violent, integrated struggle for the civil rights and worried that african americans would ultimately lose control of their own movement.
Malcolm urged followers to defend themself against white discrimination and aggression by any means necessary as the public voice of the black muslim faith. Malcolm learned from the choices he has made in his lifetime in fact they have made his a better person for an example when he was arrested and sentenced ten years in prison in 1946 for larceny for those long ten years he would read constantly from the prisons library in the attempt to make up for the years of missing education from when he dropped out of high school.
When malcolm was in prison in 1950 he wrote a letter to the president Harry Truman in which he had declared himself a communist opposed to the korean war. One day malcolm got bailed out of the prison by one of the members from the nation of islam.
After that time that he spent in prison molded him into a different person and with the influence of his fellow inmates he was lead to live a different life style. And from that one experience in his life it changed everything that he believed in, known, thought about, and everything that he stood for after that making the man that we know today as malcolm x.
Then one day malcolm was bailed out of the prison by one of the members from the Nation of islam. When malcolm got out of prison he made a speech at a event and Elijah Muhummad liked it and saw that malcolm had a good future ahead of him and this all happened in chicago.
After elijah noticed he asked malcolm if he would like to lead the black muslims so that african americans could set up their own schools, support networks,and churches.
That's when malcolm's life took a full turn and started to increase. In his speech at King solomon baptist church he talked about different christian ministers like Dr.Martin Luther King jr and malcolm said that he is not a person to fight for the fronts of something but says that I am a Black nationalist freedom fighter. Malcolm always said that Islam was his religion but he believed his religion is his own personal business.
In March 1964,Malcolm left the nation of Islam and charted his own course of militant black nationalism. In one of Malcolm's speeches he stated that Islam is his religious philosophy but his political economical and social philosophy is black nationalism.
Something else that Malcolm often said was that if you bring up the topic religion we will have differences and we will have arguments but if you keep your religion at home and keep your religion in the closet that will only be between you and god.
The Historical root of black nationalism can be traced all the way back to the 19th century to african american leaders such as Abolitionist Martin Delany. In the 20th century black nationalism was greatly influenced by Marcus Garvey who founded the United Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) in 1914 in jamaica.
The United Negro Improvement Association was dedicated to racial pride, economic self sufficiency and the formation of a independent black nation of africa. This group believed in the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of god. One of there popular mottos was One God! One Aim! One Destiny!
In one of malcolm's speeches he said that the white man wouldn't allow a black or african american man to come and gain control over the economy of his community. So why should a black man let a white man come and take control over the economy of his community.
Malcolm believed that the political philosophy of black nationalism only means that the black man should control the politics and the politics in his own community. So the economic philosophy is really the black nationalism which means that we should own and operate and control the economy of our community.
Something else that he said was If your afraid of black nationalism your afraid of revolution and if you love revolution you love black nationalism- Malcolm x message to the grassroots.
These are the most said quotes that malcolm x said Education is the passport to the future for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today or just the quote the future belongs to those who prepare for it today. And another quote is If your not careful the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. When malcolm was in the nation of islam elijah muhammad was his so called right hand man.
But elijah was having an extramarital relationship with his six secretaries and had thirteen children with them all and elijah's son ended up telling malcolm that. And so that led to a problem to malcolm once elijah's son made him aware of that. After he was aware of that he left the nation of islam.
Later on in life in June 1964 the nation of islam filed a lawsuit to reclaim the possession of malcolm's home in Queens new york. After a court appeared regarding the eviction malcolm told explosive secrets like the one about elijah.
People were threatening malcolm's life for the secrets that he knew and would tell about the nation of islam
Before malcolm left the nation of islam he spoke about the President John F. Kennedy when he was assassinated on November 22,1963 and elijah muhammad didn't want the nation of islam to comment on the assassination but malcolm did. Malcolm made controversial remarks about the president kennedy's assassination which elijah did not want and this led to malcolm's censorship by elijah.
When that happened malcolm was on the bench for a while. Somethings people were not in knowledge of.
Sources
Documentary video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EjrJ9QNWCU
Legendary speech The ballot or bullet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zLQLUpNGsc
Universal Negro Improvement Association
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Universal-Negro-Improvement-Association
U.S History
www.ushistory.org/us/54h.asp
Biography
https://www.biography.com/people/malcolm-x-9396195
Malcolm X's Explosive comment about Elijah Muhammad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pibiglqFkj8
Cite this page
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Idealism in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare uses rhetoric, dramatic irony, and the characters of Cassius and Brutus to reveal with vivid strokes how idealism undermines our capacity to comprehend different outcomes and forces us down a path of societal distress.
Idealism limits our capability to think and therefore lowers our potential as human beings. Shakespeare effectively shows this through conversations between Cassius and Brutus. Brutus is the embodiment of idealism because of his patriotism for Rome and his belief in Rome and its people. Cassius on the other hand is cunning and he is able to use this patriotism in that is in Brutus to further his own agenda and specific goals. Men at some time are masters of their fates. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves” This illustrates how simple it was to convince Brutus to kill Caesar. All Cassius needed to do was touch upon Brutus’ ego every so slightly in order to promote thought that showed him a picture of a world where he, Brutus, was ruler and how amazing that world could be for Rome. Cassius also cunningly puts forth the idea that we have control our own fate, if we want something we need to accomplish it ourselves. The fault is not in our stars, suggests that no one is born to rule, we need to earn that right which Caesar has not and Brutus can easily do. Brutus now could not look past this ideal world that he had created in his head and kept comparing it to the one with Caesar. He was debating whether or not to kill Caesar but not once did he reevaluate his position with Cassius that Caesar was ambitious. His ideal world limited the scope of his thinking a ultimately lead him to the killing of Caesar. “Like wrath in death and envy afterwards… Let us be sacrificers but not butchers, Caius.” (61,Shakespeare) Butus’ limited thought process is explicitly shown here as well, he is not able to see beyond the point that it would be wrong to kill Marc Antony simply because he was a close friend of Caesar. He saw that in his ideal world Marc Antony would not have to be killed, instead Antony could play an instrumental part in convincing the Roman people that the killing of Caesar was necessary. But in reality Brutus had been warned multiple times by Cassius that Marc Antony should be killed or at least not allowed to speak. Cassius tries to explain to Brutus that Marc Antony, if allowed to speak to the Roman public, could wreak havoc to an already volatile situation but because of his strong ideals and beliefs Brutus was left unmoved. This vividly illustrates that idealism can seriously hinder our abilities to think forward and significantly decreases our potential as human beings.
Idealism is easily manipulated to further one’s own agenda and self centered views. With the objective of convincing a man to turn his back on his friend, Cassius focuses on two specific strategies. First to prompt Brutus’ sense of civic responsibility and to weaken Brutus’ devotion to Caesar. First, Cassius uses devices such as contradiction and dramatic comparisons. He points out Caesars shortcomings and contrasts him to fellow men, showing no difference between Caesar and ordinary men in comparison. This implies that Caesar is just as likely to become corrupted with power, despite him being treated as a god. One example of this is Cassius’ constant comparing Caesar with Brutus. “ “Brutus” and “Caesar”—what should be in that/ “Caesar”? Why should that name be sounded more than/ yours?”(23). He forces Brutus to question whether such ordinary and weak men deserve to hold such power, well continually flattering Brutus. Once Brutus starts to believe that Caesar doesn’t actually have the kind of power that is implied, he starts thinking that Caesar is actually not fit to lead. In reality Cassius is jealous of Caesar’s power and even the close relationship that Brutus and Caesar have. Cassius always wanted to be part of Caesars inner circle and be part of the process as well, this never actually happened though and Cassius sought revenge in the form of breaking the relationship between Brutus and Caesar as well as seize all of Caesar’s power. Cassius is using Brutus to pursue his personal vendetta and Brutus has fallen into his trap. Cassius is aware that knowing the audience is essential to successfully persuading. When Brutus uses the word honor twice in eight lines, emphasizing the weight he places on honor. Cassius quickly takes advantage of this. “I know that virtue to be in you, Brutus,/ As well as I do know your outward favor./ Well, honor is the subject of my story.” He also emphasizes other words that Brutus resonates with, such as “free” and “Rome” as Brutus is a patriot and is willing to do anything for his country.
Cite this page
Idealism In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Julius Caesar in Shakespeare’s Play “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”
Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar is really close to having total control by becoming the emperor of Rome. However, when he thinks he is so close to getting away with it, his so called friends (most of them are from the senate) decide to overthrow him, along with Caesar's best friend, Marcus Brutus, who act as a leader of the conspirators. Though the fall of Caesar from an extremely powerful and respected man to a man who's been betrayed and stabbed twenty three times in the back and dies is a big step down, however he is not the tragic hero of this ever so tragic play.
Brutus is considered the tragic hero of this play because he was faced with major conflicts, he was stuck between choosing his loyalty to Caesar, or his loyalty to Rome. Brutus decides to stay loyal to Rome because even though his connection with Caesar is strong, his connection with the people of Rome is stronger. After Brutus killed Caesar he goes onto say ...Not that I lov'd Caesar less, but that I lov'd Rome more. (3.2.15) This shows that Brutus is willing to do anything for the empire that he is extremely loyal to, even if it means the death of his friend is on his hands. Brutus has support from the people of Rome and does not want them to lose their power because of Caesar. Because people who strongly dislike Caesar (The conspirators and people from the senate) know about Brutus' loyalty to his empire, they are able to take advantage of him and convince him to go along with their plan to kill Caesar.Brutus chooses to go along with their plan because he believes it is what is best for Rome.
However, some people claim that Caesar is the tragic hero. The reason for this is not the fact that he is the leader (well that might have something to do with it), but people say this because Caesar is of noble stature when Caesar is offered a crown from Antony he refuses it three times while the people of Rome watch, Aye marry was't, and he put it by thrice, every time gentler than the others, and every putting-by mine honest neighbors shouted (1.2.225). The People of Rome see this as respectful and noble. People also claim this because Caesars downfall was caused by injustice. Brutus still remains the tragic hero. He stayed loyal to his empire no matter the cost, he killed his most trusted friend just so the Roman people could be free. If that does not prove someone is a hero I do not know what will. Brutus also killed himself out of guilt from killing Caesar.
As proven, Brutus is clearly the tragic hero of this play. He was constantly faced with choosing who he has to stay loyal to. He does what he thinks is best for his country therefore making him a hero. Brutus consistently shows his loyalty to Rome and Rome's people, he wants what is best for them no matter the cost. Maybe next time you read a book you should see who the real tragic hero is. It just might surprise you. It might be the person you least expected it to be.
Work Cited
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Literature and the Language Arts
Understanding Literature, e dited by Laurie Skiba, EMC/Paradigm Publishing, 2005, 246-338.
Cite this page
Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar". (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
“The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare
In the play “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Antony is viewed as loyal to Caesar and honors his life by giving a speech to all of Rome at his funeral. His task of convincing the Romans that his death is unjustified is complicated by the compelling speech Brutus has just made about why it is justified. Nevertheless, Antony’s speech results in success due to his use of antithesis and gruesome diction.
In his funeral speech, Mark Antony uses antithesis to disprove Brutus’ justification of murdering Caesar. At the funeral, Antony is speaking to the citizens of Rome and reminding them of the good Caesar had accomplished before his death. He reminds them of how “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: Yet Brutus says he was ambitious” (Shakespeare, 90-94). This quote exemplifies how Caesar empathizes with the people of Rome and genuinely wants to improve their lives. Contrasting this against Brutus’ claim challenges its credibility by providing evidence against it. Antony also states that he “thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice did refuse... Yet Brutus says he was ambitious” (Shakespeare, 95-99). Here, Antony specifies that Caesar refused to be crowned not once, but three times (“thrice”). Turning it down three times shows he denied it willfully, not to appear humble. Many leaders with selfish intentions are careful to hide them and do or say things to appear like they are ruling “for the good of the people.”
A leader like this may say no when first asked to be crowned, in order to maintain their selfless image, but would eventually give in to their craving for power. Having been asked three times and still saying no proves that Caesar genuinely meant it and would do what is in Rome’s best interest, even when the Romans themselves wanted him to be king. Antony shows the invalidity of Brutus’s claim by demonstrating how even when given the opportunity of greater power, Caesar did not take take advantage of it. Though the Romans initially support the assassination of Caesar after hearing Brutus’ speech, Antony is successful in refuting his justification of it and thereby convincing the Romans that Caesar's murder was unwarranted and tragic.
Antony also utilizes gruesome diction to evoke emotion from the citizens of Rome. He presents vivid descriptions of Caesar’s murder, using phrases such as “ran Cassius' dagger through” (168-169), “the blood of Caesar followed...rushing” (171-173), and “all the while ran blood” (183). By having such vivid, gory words placed in their minds, the citizens of Rome begin to sympathize with Caesar and thereby become angry about his murder. Later into his speech when announcing he is holding Caesar’s will, Antony says that if he read it aloud, “the commons...would go and kiss Caesar’s dead wounds and dip their napkins in his sacred blood” (128-135). Antony specifically focuses on how the citizens themselves would react if they heard Caesar’s will, which makes Caesar’s death feel like a personal offence to them. He also uses gruesome word choice, which tends to evoke strong emotions such as disturbance and sadness. By using words that bring out these emotions in the Roman citizens, he makes them feel as if they should be sorrowful about his death, and moreover, that anyone who doesn’t feel sorrowful about it is lacking in moral character.
Mark Antony’s speech was effective in persuading the Romans that the conspirators should not have killed Caesar because he confuted any reason they would have to defend it. His impact on the citizens not only changed their view on Caesar’s death, but determined the course of the play and the fate of Rome. If Antony doesn’t given his speech after Brutus gives his, the Romans will continue to support Brutus and the other conspirators, giving them power. However, after hearing Antony speak, they declare mutiny against the conspirators and begin a riot, which starts a civil war. The potential for one speech to be so impactful on a whole city exhibits how words alone can change the course of history.
Cite this page
"The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Concept of Fate in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare
Fate is inevitable, unavoidable, and ultimately ends in death. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, multiple characters experience a deadly fate, but it is not completely unavoidable. People also have control of their own lives and the ability to make decisions, affecting them and others. Shakespeare uses characters in this play to illustrate the theme of fate and to project how easily it can be tampered with. Fate, as a theme in this play, is involved in many of the characters' lives. Fate is dependent on a person's actions.
Julius Caesar is a character who inflicts death upon himself. Caesar ruled in the triumvirate with two powerful men, and when it came crashing down, Caesar was the only one lucky enough to stay alive. He had been involved in the death of another member, Pompey, whom was loved by the Romans: O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome, Knew you not Pompey? (1:1:38-39). Caesar is now taking Pompey's place, and was being celebrated, when he killed the people's ruler. If Caesar hadn't been so ambitious for power, he wouldn't have gone into battle with Pompey and ultimately taken the throne from him. Then, when he is awarded with the power, he turned down the crown three times to seem humble, He put it by thrice, every time gentler than other; and at every putting by mine honest neighbors shouted (1:2:228-230). Most people still applauded him, but others saw his bluff. If Caesar wouldn't have been as greedy for the power, he would have been alive at the end of the play. The reader sees Caesar's downfall play out. After killing a respected member of the government and taking over, there is bound to be criticism. The senators begin to turn on Caesar, just like he does against Pompey.
All the senators join to justly plot the murder of Caesar, but they don't complete it without consequences. Brutus, a well-respected man of Rome, believed in the mission to put Caesar to rest, And therefore think him of a servant's egg Which hatched, would as his king grow mischievous, And kill him in the shell (2:1:32-34). The conspirators do not feel as though Caesar is trustworthy as a ruler; he did turn on Pompey. The belief is that Rome will be a much better place if Caesar is not part of it. Some conspirators had other reasons, on top of Caesar being selfish and greedy, that led them to participate in killing Julius Caesar. For example, Metellus Cimber, a conspirator, asks Caesar one last time before he dies, to let his brother come back: Is there no voice more worthy than my own, to sound more sweetly in great Caesar's ear For the repealing of my banished brother? (3:1:49-51). Caesar had banished his brother from Rome prior to the setting of the play and Metellus seems to hold a grudge about it throughout the plot. Caesar is put to death in order to prove a point that Rome and its' citizens would be better off without a ruler like him. Participating in the murder soon comes back to haunt each conspirator and lead to the formation of their own fates.
The conspirators all face the repercussions for their actions. Brutus allowed Antony to speak at Caesar's funeral. This was a big mistake. He uses sarcasm to address the conspirators as being honorable throughout his speech. By rallying the citizens up, together with Antony they can riot against each of the conspirators. They even go so far as to kill an innocent man with the same name as Cinna, Cinna the poet. A group of citizens carry Cinna the poet off the stage and one can only imagine what they would do to a real conspirator: Tear him! Tear him! (They attack him) Come, brands, ho! To Brutus', to Cassius'! Burn all! Some to Decius' house, and some to Casca's; some to Ligarius'! (3:3:35-38). The people are finally giving all the senators what they believe is just. Brutus should have listened to Cassius and decided not to let Antony speak because now every Roman citizen wants the conspirators dead, and all eventually face that. Brutus could have saved himself by refusing to join in the first place, they all could have. But all of them participated and must deal with the consequences. Before the battle begins, Brutus tells Cassius, But this same day Must end that work the ides of March begun (5:1:112-113). The conspirators completed their mission on the 15th of March, and then their fates were altered. Caesar made decisions and acted in ways that formed his fate; the Conspirators should have seen their death coming.
Life is full of choices, each choice that is made contributes to a person's fate. Caesar killed Pompey and was a selfish ruler, for his short time in power. The conspirators saw the truth in this and decided to act on Caesar's bad ruling capabilities. But, by killing Caesar, they too changed their own fates. Any little action made by a person can be remembered and held against them. What someone thinks is unfair or just may not appear that way to everyone. It only takes one small decision to change a person's fate. Keep in mind every time a decision is going to be made, that people will remember it.
Cite this page
Concept of Fate In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. (2019, Mar 25).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/
Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Research Assignment
Queen Elizabeth I: Queen Elizabeth was Queen of England from 1558-1603. The era she reigned in is know as England's golden age because of the reformation taking place. She had an unpleasant childhood and as a result it affected some of the decisions she made while on the throne. A few of her more remarkable accomplishments are the Elizabethan Religious Settlement, and the defeat of the great spanish armada. The previous Kings had made many changes in religion, the Elizabethan Religious Settlement was The Queen's way of bringing the country together. Queen Elizabeth was known for giving amazing speeches. Queen Elizabeth died at the age of 69 years old. Her legacy has lasted longer than she could've ever imagined (Elizabeth I). Renaissance England: Renaissance is by definition the rebirth of art, education and culture.
The English Renaissance occurred at the end of the middle ages. The middle ages wa a time of destruction, a learning decline. Girolamo was a religious leader during the renaissance that believed if the citizens of corrupt cities prayed, they could be redeemed. Artist during this period often painted the human body, stressing the beauty of the human body. The most important aspect of the renaissance is humanism. Humanism combines human actions and feelings with religion. The most important branch of learning during the Renaissance was theology. Simply put theology is the study of God (Hawkins).
William Shakespeare: William Shakespeare was born April 26th, 1564 and died April 23rd 1616.
He is considered by many to be the greatest dramatist of all time. Shakespeare wrote many plays, some of the more well known plays are Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, and Julius Caesar. Shakespeare's plays were performed in a theatre called the Globe Theatre. The Globe burned down in 1613, and was rebuilt by 1614. Shakespeare was also apart of a company called Lord Chamberlain's Men (William). Lord Chamberlain's men put on several plays, and often times Queen Elizabeth herself would come to watch. Lord Chamberlain's men was the most dominant theatre company in England during the Elizabethan era (Lord).
ROME: Julius Caesar: Julius Caesar was born July 12th 100 BCE and died March 14th 44 BCE. He was alive during the time the Roman Empire was in power. He was from a Patrician, or upper class family. He rose to power as part of a triumvirate, but Crassus was killed in battle and he defeated Pompey in a series of civil wars. Julius Caesar declared himself a dictator for life. While he was in power he passed many law and changed policies on issues such as tax collection. Julius Caesar was murdered by Roman Senators. In that time period emperor assassinations were common and expected (Julius). Ancient Rome Rule: Before the Romans took power, the Etruscans were in control. In 509 BCE the Romans overthrew the Etruscans and established the Roman Republic. In the Republic citizens elect officials, then the officials vote. The Roman Republic lasted until 27 BC when the Roman Republic became the Roman Empire. The first triumvirate that was in power was Caesar, Crassus, and Pompey. Crassus was killed in battle, Pompey was killed by Julius Caesar in a series of civil wars, and Caesar was murdered by a group of Roman senators.
After the murder of Caesar, Octavian, Julius Caesar's heir, rose to power. He was apart of the second triumvirate which consisted of him, Marc Antony and Lepidus. The second triumvirate split up because Lepidus was exiled, then it was a power struggle between Marc Antony and Octavian (Ancient). Religion/Superstitions: The legendary founders of Rome were Remus and Romulus. Remus and Romulus were supposed to be drowned in the Tiber River, but they survived. Faustulus and his wife saved them and raised them to be strong boys. They ended up killing Amulius and giving their grandfather his throne back. Romulus killed his brother when he attempted to jump over his wall. Romulus now had all the power, he grew his city by allowing criminals to come and live there. He also kidnapped Women and forced them to marry in. Many people believed Romulus was a Gd after he disappeared in a storm ( Romulus). Lupercalia was a festival held each year on February 15th. It celebrated Romulus and Remus, as well as fertility (Luperalia).
Works Cited
"Ancient Rome." Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2018, Web. Accessed 15 Nov. 2018.
Elizabeth I."" Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 31 Aug. 2017, Web. Accessed 14 Nov. 2018.
Hankins, James. "Renaissance." World Book Student, World Book, 2018, Web.
Accessed 15 Nov. 2018. "Julius Caesar." Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 1 Nov. 2017, Web.
Accessed 15 Nov. 2018. Lord Chamberlain's Men." Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 11 Aug. 2018, Web. Accessed 15 Nov. 2018.
"Lupercalia." Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Apr. 2014, Web. Accessed 15 Nov. 2018.
Romulus and Remus." Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 13 Apr. 2018, Web.
Accessed 15 Nov. 2018. ""William Shakespeare."" Britannica School, Encyclopedia Britannica, 19 Jul. 2017, Web. Accessed 15 Nov. 2018.
Cite this page
Shakespeare's Julius Caesar Research Assignment. (2019, Mar 24).
Retrieved November 4, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/8/