The Overview of Childhood Obesity

Obesity is a current health epidemic that has dreadful consequences for America's health, particularly among low-income children and adolescents. The rising rate of obesity has reached epidemic proportions and is now one of the most grave public health challenges facing the US. However, underlying causes for this increase are unclear.

This literature studies several of the factors that place low-income children at risk for developing obesity; psychological, environmental, and biological. This investigation will show that none of these particular factors operate in isolation but are torturously intertwined, as suggested the Biopsychosocial model of Disease provided by Psychology. The findings indicated that participant's weight was most influenced by family lifestyle and school environment factors. More proper education and prevention methods are essential in creating a safer healthcare system that provides maximal quality of life.

The Overview of Childhood Obesity

Obesity is a critical health problem that is increasing worldwide, and in the United States in particular. In the US, the percentage of children and teens affected by obesity has more than tripled since 1970's ( Irimia R, Gottschling M 2016). According to a survey conducted and published in JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, seven states have self-reported obesity rates surpassing 35%, according to new data from the CDC, up from the comparison in 2012 in which all states were lower than 35% (Bridget Kuehn, MSJ, 2018). Excess weight is not just a matter of physical appearance.

The concerns about the increasing prevalence of obesity are founded in the association between obesity and adverse health outcomes and increased health expenditures. Obesity has been linked to an increased risk of numerous comorbidities, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, osteoarthritis, asthma, and gallbladder disease.

An alarming fact of this epidemic is that children are increasingly becoming obese. Data collected from the CDC during the years 2015-2016 show that nearly 1 in 5 school age children and young people (6 to 19 years) in the United States has obesity ( Irimia R, Gottschling M 2016). Adolescents who are Black or Hispanic or live in poverty are at almost twice the risk for being overweight as non-Hispanic white youth. These children will become more susceptible to a poorer quality of life plagued by various illnesses, low energy and eventually low esteem.

There is a magnitude of factors that lead children to overeat, make innutritious diet choices, and not exercise consistently. Of great concern is that children who are overweight or obese are also more likely to be overweight or obese as adults (Freedman Et Al., 2005; Wang, 2008). Psychology, as a science of human behavior, offers a powerful perspective on the interwoven nature of these factors and can point the way towards the development of successful interventions to halt the march of this epidemic. However, this research has largely ignored the role of rising income. Studies that have examined the role of income on obesity within the United States have been unable to account for the potential endogeneity and reverse causality between income and weight and obesity prevalence.

Social and Enviromental Factors

With the numerous medical concerns obesity causes, childhood obesity affects children's social and emotional health. Obese adolescents are often bullied and/or teased because they are overweight. They face being exiled from activities, particularly sports. These negative social issues lead to low self esteem, low self confidence within themselves (Sahoo, K., Sahoo, B., 2015). The negative issues of childhood obesity presented can be life altering to children. The consequences of being an obese child tend to contribute to difficulty in weight management. Obese children shy away the public eye to protect themselves from negative comments and unwanted attention; retreating to safe places, such as their homes (Lobstein, T., Jackson-Leach, R., 2015).

The social factors intertwined with being apart of a low income family, the pressure on the child surmounts anything one could imagine. Low income families are faced with various obstacles that prevent them from obtaining a healthy lifestyle regimen, thus socioeconomic status tends to play a significant role in the obesity epidemic (Lobstein, T., Jackson-Leach, R., 2015). Environmental factors that include; low-income, lack of access to healthy food choices, and lack of resources within the confines of the community can definitely contribute to obesity. Approximately 23.5 million people within the United State live what the United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) labels a food desert; an urban area in which it is difficult to buy affordable or good-quality fresh food (United States Department of Agriculture, 2009).

Within these low-income communities, the only places residents are able to buy food are fast-food restaurants and gas stations that offer sugary, fatty, and processed products according to the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC). These restaurants serve many energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods at relatively low prices. Fast food consumption is associated with a diet high in calories and low in nutrients, and frequent consumption may lead to weight gain (Powell & Nguyen, 2013). According to researchers at the Rudd Center suggest that despite the addition of some healthy kids' meal options, less than 1% of all kids' meal combinations - 33 out of 5,427 possible meals -- met recommended nutrition standards (Yale, Rudd Center 2013).

These hyperpalatable foods served at Burger King, and or McDonald's, for instance, are much higher in fats, sugar and sodium than healthier foods choice (i.e. vegetables and fruits). In addition to the lack of access to healthy food options, parents within these communities work long hours outside of the household. Which leaves the parent(s) not having the adequate time to prepare healthy meals at home, making it harder to set up a routine of eating quality food.

A child's environment and mind is also flooded with the presence of media. Typically children spend 44.5 hours a week in front of electronic screens. Watching television has been directly linked to obesity in childhood, with a rate of obesity that is 8.3-times greater in children who watch more than 5 hours of television per day compared with those who watch up to 2 hours of television per day (Proctor MH et al. (2003). Adolescents aged 9-14 spend over 20 percent of waking hours watching television, compared to 9 percent on hobbies and 3.5 percent on homework. The average American teen spends about 20 hours a week watching television, with the heaviest viewers coming from low-income households (Irimia R, Gottschling M 2016).

Electronic use time amounts to nine hours a day for children of minorities, more than the six hours a day watched by Caucasian children. Not only are adolescents moving less when they watch television, but they are also more exposed to the media's message. Low-income children are exposed to disproportionately more marketing and advertising for obesity-promoted products that encourage the consumption of unhealthful foods (fast food, sugar infested beverages) and discourage physical activity (television shows, video games) according to a report issued by the Institute of Medicine (2013).

Approximately 0% of the commercials broadcast on children's networks are for fruit or vegetables, while about 34% of the commercials are for candy and snacks. Such advertising has a particularly strong influence on the preferences, diets, and of children, who are the targets of these marketing efforts (Institute of Medicine, 2013). Media outlets are not the only culprits; children exposed to marketing by advertising on billboards, on buses, and at school in vending machines. The marketing is very exploitative, for adolescents under the age of 10 do not comprehend the sole intent behind these ads. Simply viewing a commercial once can create a preference for a child, impacting what the child will begin to ask their parents to buy (Harris, Bargh, Brownell, 2009).

Psychological Risk Factors

Psychological factors affecting other medical conditions is diagnosed when attitudes or behaviors have a negative effect on a medical disorder that the person has. People's attitudes or behavior can negatively affect any disorder (such as obesity, heart disease and or diabetes).
An enormous number of studies have revealed that the initial food environment of obese children differs distinctly from other children. Adolescents who are obese frequently eat a bigger portion of food and the quality of food is often high in calories. These individuals often have raised food portion sizes, increased calorie intake and eat less fruits and vegetables from an early age compared to normal weight children of the same age (Bammann, K., 2014).

Obese children tend to have less hours of physical activity and spend more time using electronics. This inactive lifestyle combined with high caloric intake contributes to obesity. It is well documented that a large number of children with pediatric obesity have parents and or family who are obese as well. Parents who are obese contribute to specific food environments, that are created at a young age.
The underlying basis of obesity and eating disorders tend to lie in some grouping of psychosocial, environmental, and genetic attributes. Individuals who suffer from mental disorder (e.g. eating disorder, depression, and anxiety) may have more trouble controlling their food intake, obtaining the adequate amount of exercise and maintaining a healthy weight.

Those who suffer from obesity, tend to use food as a coping mechanism, particularly when they are stressed, feeling isolated, sad and or anxious. Many of these individuals there seems to be a perpetual cycle of mood swings, gluttony and weight gain. When in a mood of distress, these individuals turn to food to cope, and to comfort them which may result in temporary attenuation of their current mood. The weight gain that results may cause a dysphoric mood due to their inability to control their stress. The guilt they accumulate tends to reactivate the cycle, leading to a ongoing pattern of using food to cope with their emotions.

Mental factors also play a real role in increasing the risk for childhood obesity by influencing dietary choices. Due to the fact children are very dependent on their parents for providing food, their parents' choices largely determine their diets. The development of children's food preferences involves a complex interplay of genetic, familial, and psychological factors. There is evidence of a strong genetic influence on appetite traits in children, but environment plays an important role in modeling children's eating behaviors.

Parents use a variety of strategies to influence children's eating habits, some of which are counterproductive. Overcontrol, restriction, pressure to eat, and a promise of rewards have negative effects on children's food acceptance. Parents' food preferences and eating behaviors give an opportunity to model good eating habits. Satiety is closely related to diet composition, and foods with low energy density contribute to prevent overeating. Parents should be informed about the consequences of an unhealthy diet and lifestyle and motivated to change their nutritional habits (Scaglioni, S., De Cosmi, V., 2018).

Biological Risk Factors

Biological factors, such as exercise activity and sleep amount, also play a significant role in maintaining health. Physical activity controls weight by stimulating the metabolic, endocrine, and hormone processes of the body. Regrettably, adolescents have become increasingly lazy over recent years. Children who live in low-income neighborhoods have even fewer opportunities to safely exercise partly due to the fewer parks, green spaces, bike paths, and recreational facilities than are found in high-income communities, making it problematic to live a physically active lifestyle (FRAC, 2013). Due to high crime rate, and other safety concerns, children and adults, alike, are more likely to stay indoors and engage in inactive activities, such as watching television or playing video games.

This lack of physical activity is established by the fact that less than 20% of ethnic minority adolescents participate in youth sports (Wijtzes, A. I., Jansen, W., 2014). Along with parents who do not participate in any physical activity themselves, adolescents aren't given many examples of what being active looks like.

Another biological risk factor for obesity is the quality and measure of one's sleep. Research has shown that interrupted sleep interferes with the body's ability to effectively process fats and calories by altering hormone production (Myers, D. 2011). When a person is suffering from sleep deprivation, there is an increase in ghrelin in the intestines, which creates an appetite and creates the hunger feeling. Also, proteins, and leptin, which creates a feeling of being full, decreases; and, the stress-related hormone, cortisol, which leads to fat storage, increases. A person who does not sleep well will obviously feel tired and have less energy to exercise and carry out their daily routine.

Conclusion

This study was conducted to gain an understanding of how social-environmental, psychological and biological factors including family lifestyle, culture, neighborhood environment, and social environment that were present during participants' childhood, impact obesity. The tangled nature of the risk factors for childhood obesity may seem impossible to overcome and leave doctors, researchers, and policy makers feeling hopeless about putting a halt to this epidemic. However, the biopsychosocial model of disease used by psychologists demonstrates that it is within this very interplay of biological, environmental and psychological factors that we can find optimism. The biopsychosocial model advocates that by creating even a slight change in a child's behavior, a well-designed intervention program has the potential to decrease obesity by creating a ripple effect that will be felt within the system.

As a captive audience, children ages eight through twelve years experience the most exposure to these ads that infiltrate their minds with negative notions for healthy eating, exercising and caring about your health. It is perfect the age(s) to approach adolescents with new and convincing ideas that allow for the beginning of new, empowering thoughts about developing a healthy body. Numerous of American children have become fixed on a malicious biological, psychological/mental, and social cycle that is directing them towards a sustained future suffering from obesity. Yet, psychology permits us to recognize that due to the linked nature of the factors causing obesity, this cycle also has a solution.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Overview of Childhood Obesity. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Predetermined Physiological Range

Every year in the United States there is a rise in the prevalence of obese people as well as obese children. There is much controversy though of what the underlying cause is of obesity in adults and children. In this paper I will focus on the roles of nature and nurture in childhood obesity. Many people say that biology, genetics, and environmental factors have a huge role in this overwhelming number of obese children in the United States, but is there one with a greater influence than all of the others? For example statistics state that children have an 80% chance of becoming obese if their parents are both obese and a 50% chance of becoming obese if only one of their parents is obese (Benioff Children's Hospital, 2018). Right now there are two sides to the argument of why there is an epidemic of obesity in children throughout the United States.

The one side is nature in which we can look towards children's specific genetic makeup, predetermined physiological range, genetic alterations, and advantageous gene selection to help explain childhood obesity. The other side is nurture in which we can look towards children's physical inactivity, sociodemographic features, and their diet to help explain childhood obesity rates. There are many factors that contribute to childhood obesity, but is there a single factor that is more influential than all of the others? This is where the debate of nature versus nurture and their influence on childhood obesity begins.

Nature- Genetics and one's Predetermined Physiological Range, Genetic alterations, and Advantageous Gene Selection

On the side of nature leading to childhood obesity, there are various biological factors that have been discovered to cause obesity. In detail, the understanding that childhood obesity is caused by nature implies that one's own genetic inheritance influences a child's risk for developing obesity. Specifically, the genetic material provides the framework to develop an individual and is therefore important to examine when trying to gain a better understanding on the contributing factors to the obesity epidemic. In depth, obesity has been linked back to biological factors, such as one's genetic makeup by examining the body's natural physiological ranges, genetic alterations, and advantageous allelic selection.

Our body's natural tendency to maintain a certain weight and stature, based on the amount of energy our bodies require, can lead to childhood obesity. According to an interview with Dr. Randy Seeley, director of Nutrition Obesity Research Center at MIT, our bodies have the ability to regulate fat via the hormone leptin. Leptin is produced by our body's adipose cells to regulate the satiety and hunger centers in our brain, in which leptin travels to the hypothalamus to increase the satiety center (feeling of fullness) and decrease the hunger center (Cortell, 2014). This feedback mechanism tells us that our bodies have predetermined ranges for the amount of energy it requires to perform its daily bodily functions and activities.

This mechanism is regulated by our fat cells, and can therefore stimulate the amount of food a child needs to consume, thereby leading to obesity in cases of positive energy intake.

In addition to a predetermined physiological range for our bodies, alterations in monogenic genes may also lead to childhood obesity. As discovered by Wabitsch et al. 2015, alterations in monogenic genes, such as the leptin gene, have been found to lead to severe early onset of obesity in a two year old child. In this study, a congenital leptin deficiency was found to alter the regulation of the satiety and feeding centers in the brain, leading to increased eating habits, as well as alterations in metabolic processes. In detail, the LEP gene has been mutated, thereby altering the correct formation of the leptin protein, thus altering the pathway in the central nervous system by decreasing the satiety center and increasing the hunger center.

As a result, this tells your body that you are hungry and encourages the intake of food. Furthermore, immediate normalization of eating habits was rapidly achieved, in this study, when the child was treated with leptin, and thereby resulting in weight loss. Although this case points towards severe obesity resulting from a congenital mutation, it is important to recognize that congenital defects in the Leptin gene are rare (2%) and that this is also a case report on a single child, not a large population.

Not only can mutations occur in one's genetic material to cause childhood obesity, advantageous selection of monogenic genes in humans distant past may also lead to childhood obesity. In the past, it was found that monogenic genes were advantageous, especially during time of famine, therefore the thrifty genotype theory may explain why some children become obese. The thrifty genotype theory focuses on the advantageous selection of specific genetic alleles that allowed our ancestors to survive when scarce food was available. Due to the selection of these variations and the availability of food in today's society, individuals with these types of previously beneficial genetic variations are actually experiencing the harmful outcomes of obesity and subsequent comorbidities.

Although few of these advantageous genetic variations have been discovered, some have been found and may therefore account for a subset of individuals who are obese (Southam et. al, 2009).
Although there are various biological factors that have been discovered to cause childhood obesity and contribute to the obesity epidemic, only a subset of the population may actually be affected by these factors. As a result, the environmental factors may possibly contribute to the majority of cases of children with obesity, which will be examined next.

Nurture- Physical Inactivity, Sociodemographic Features, and Diet

On the other hand, nurture seems to play a much larger role in childhood obesity. As previously mentioned, a child whose parents are obese have an astronomical increased risk of becoming obese (80%), which may reflect environmental influences their parents play on their child (Benioff Children's Hospital, 2018). In this case, nurture is referring to all the environmental factors that may have an impact on a child and may lead to obesity, such as physical inactivity, sociodemographic features, and/or diet.

In the past decade, there has been a decrease in physical activity and a rise in obesity, correlating the two and most likely contributing to the obesity epidemic, especially amongst children. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), it is recommended that children engage in 60 minutes of exercise every day to encourage a healthy lifestyle and reduce the risk for obesity as well as subsequent comorbidities (Healthy Schools: Physical Activity Facts, 2018).

Unfortunately, most children are not meeting their recommended daily goal due to the increase in sedentary lifestyles, such as the shift from farmers and laborers to sitting in a classroom most of the day and focusing on studies, increased screen time on the computer or television, as well as influential behavior from family and friends (Pradinuk et. al, 2011). As a result, these environmental factors are decreasing children's physical activity levels and are contributing to obesity.

In addition to the increase in physical inactivity among school-aged children, a low socioeconomic status (SES), as well as racial or ethnic backgrounds, have been linked to a higher prevalence of obesity. Specifically, young children in these groups were found to eat a larger amount of food in a single meal, as well as eat less frequently than their school-aged counterparts. It is believed that these eating habits (eating less frequently, but consuming more food) early in a child's second year of life may influence their eating habits later in life in such a way that it may lead to over-eating, and ultimately obesity (Mcconahy et. al, 2002). Therefore, a child's sociodemographic has a large impact early in life.

Along with the impact that sociodemographic features play on obesity, diet throughout a child's life, especially during infancy, has been found to cause obesity in children. For instance, a child's upbringing post-partum has been known to alter their microbiota. In turn, it was found that these alterations in their microbiota are connected to obesity. Although it is unclear whether variations in the microbiota are the cause or result of obesity, a connection between the two was found in a study by Kalliomaki et. al, 2008.

This study compared children who were classified as obese to children of normal weight in the same age groups and were age-matched by the following features: birth method, BMI at birth, gestational age, duration of breastfeeding, use of antibiotics, probiotic supplementation, and atopic sensitization. It was found that children with higher levels of Bifidobacterium species in their microbiota were of normal weight, whereas higher levels of Staphylococcus aureus numbers were found in children with obesity. Therefore, environmental influences play an important role in influencing a child's health as well as health outcome, such as obesity.

Overall, a shift in the Western society poses various environmental challenges that have been found to contribute to childhood obesity, such as an increase in physical inactivity, sociodemographic features, and diet. Thus far, it seems as if nurture plays a much larger role in the obesity epidemic.

Conclusion- Nature and Nurture in Harmonious Interplay

Although most cases of children with obesity may result from influences on their nurture, who is it to say that they single-handedly cause childhood obesity. There may be a synergistic type of effect, in which an individual's genetic makeup may put a child at risk for obesity and on top of that environmental influences may drastically increase this risk. For instance, every individual's body makeup is predetermined by their genetics, in which one's genetics may interact environmental factors, such as stress, drugs, etc., that may alter their genetics, specifically a gene's expression. It is impossible to eliminate one's genetics, so although it seems as if nurture plays a larger role in leading to childhood obesity, it may have a synergistic interaction with nature.

For this reason, I believe that nature and nurture are in a harmonistic interplay when it comes to childhood obesity. That being said, since environmental influences play a huge impact on childhood obesity, whether it be adjoined with nature or alone, as a society, we can easily help prevent childhood obesity and stop the obesity epidemic. In addition, our families play a huge and important role in our development, making this is a great starting point to prevent childhood obesity. For instance, it was found that tackling obesity as a family greatly improves physical activity and encourages healthy weight loss (Healthy active living for children and youth, 2002). At large, both nature and nurture factors need to be addressed, in regard to childhood obesity, to help diminish their influence on the obesity epidemic, as well as subsequent health problems.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Predetermined Physiological Range. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Childhood Obesity has Become an Epidemic

Introduction

Childhood obesity has become an epidemic in the United States, it is defined as excessive accumulation and storage of fat in the body and it is putting children at risk for poor physical and mental health. They say you are what you eat, and it truly reflects your image what you put inside your body. It is incredibly important to develop healthy eating habits at a young age. Although not everyone is raised the same, the lack of nutrients and vitamins from fruits and vegetables impact a child's body negatively. Causing digestive problems, weight gain, among other health problems that should not happen early in life. The growth of instant food, family habits, government and school policies all affect the development of a child's body.

They're many causes that lead to obesity and the outcome takes a toll in their young life. The percentage of children and adolescents affected by obesity has more than tripled since the 1970's. Fryar, C (2014). Parents and anyone surrounded by young children should be aware of the consequences of obesity and how we can help prevent the rate from going up. Together we can help reduce the risk and provide a healthy and bright future for our children.

They're many factors that play a role in childhood obesity such as poor diets, lack of physical activities, metabolism, genetics, sleep deprivation and your surroundings such as your neighborhood, parenting style. Bad habits are hard to break and replace with nourishing ideals that will help a child's developmental process. Although metabolism and genetics are hereditary they're not directly linked as the main cause of obesity. Most if not all processed foods are convenient to obtain which is why most parents lean towards them.

Which leads to see the bigger spectrum behind their decisions, more low-income families can't sit at the dinner table because the parent/s have to work long hours, third shifts, or hit overtime. These low-income neighborhoods frequently lack grocery stores and markets, they're limited to small convenience stores and a greater availability of fast food restaurants. These stores typically lack fresh food, they're usually stocked with microwavable meals and sugary beverages. Vehicle access plays a role in how fresh the food in the fridge is, meaning that a monthly trip to the grocery store is less likely to convey fresh fruits and vegetables that have a limited time to consume, whereas frozen dinners have a longer expectancy. While less expensive, energy-dense foods typically have lower nutritional quality, and because of overconsumption of calories, have been liked to obesity. Kant, A (2005).

However, these parental factors affect the child in the home significantly and may cause obesity and low social interaction which leads to lack of physical activities. The less active the more likely they're at risk. The inactivity and time they dedicate to gaming systems, television, and computers is potential for physical activities. It goes on to a tangent of negative aspects that physically and emotionally affect the child's life. Without a parent at home the child has the option of going to sleep whenever they desire, which may cause sleep deprivation and can also cause the child to over eat.

The effects that obesity does to the body may cause a lifetime of health problems if not addressed early in life. Obese children are more likely to remain obese as they transition into adulthood. The initiation of puberty is an adequate nutritional status, there is a possible link between early puberty and obesity. The limited studies based on this certain topic are unable to answer this statement. The female hormone estrogen is suspected to play a role in early puberty. Fat cells also produce aromatase which is the enzyme that synthesizes estrogen from other sex hormones. When excess body fat is present there is an excess estrogen production in the body much may cause overweight girls to develop faster.

The presence of the female hormone in boys could delay puberty, estrogen is influencing their development as it does for girls.
While obesity itself is not a chronic condition, it is a risk factor for four of the ten leading causes of death in the U.S which are coronary heart disease, type II diabetes, stroke, and cancer. Wolf,A.M (2001). Diseases that were once only seen in adults are now being seen in children. The numerous complications in relation to obesity are alarming, it is safe to say that as a child's weight increases so does their chances to die.

Developing any type of chronic disease often requires long-term care which can accumulate to costly bills every year. The estimated annual health care cost of obesity-related illness are a staggering $190.2 billion or nearly 21% of annual medical spending in the United States. Cawley, J (2012). The last worry a child should have is remembering to check their sugar level or if they took their insulin shot. Type 2 diabetes affects children as young as 4, the freedom of being a care-free child is being taken away as soon as they're diagnosed with a disease. Our children are our future and we must keep them healthy and strong. If obesity rates keep staggering an all-time high, the next generation may be the first to have a shorter lifespan.

Several psychological factors play a role in childhood obesity causing depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem. The emotional toll it takes on a child's life is draining if they do not have proper help and guidance to a healthier lifestyle. Nothing is harder than looking at yourself in the mirror after all the comments from your classmates and peers regarding your weight. All of this tension may inflict psychological harm resulting in social stigmatization. It is defined as the extreme disapproval or discontent of a person. A depressed child loses interest in everyday activities and will sleep more to avoid interaction.

Food can become a comfort zone to them, often causing them to over eat and gain more weight. Most if not all the time they're consuming high calorie snacks and sweetened drinks. Although some will starve themselves and end up binge eating causing a disorder to develop. Consuming large quantities of food at a fast pace on a stomach that has been empty for a week is causing a life-threatening disorder. Many eating disorders are caused by the main three factors I mentioned, it is important to keep a close eye on any child that may suffer from childhood obesity and is transitioning into an adolescence.

Low self-esteem and lack of self-confidence appears more in school when the child starts to compare their bodies to the rest of their classmates. It can create a sense of hopelessness and can lead to low performances in school. Not wanting to present in front of the classroom or running the pacer test for gym class can set them back academically. The comments concerning the child's weight consumes them and it's all they think about. It creates anxiety and fear of being around social groups. They're challenged in many ways, mostly physically which causes them to have a bad self-image, feeling like an outcast. Often teased at school and victims of bullying it is hard to see the light at the end of the tunnel. It can be a very dark time and it's important to shine light on these issues and help these children see how beautiful life can be when you're healthy and strong.

Conclusion

In conclusion, as a society we can all help and contribute to strive for a healthier lifestyle and inflict that on future generations. Working together as a family helps to uplift the child in need of guidance to see that their health is important. They're many healthy alternatives to the fast food that we love to get when its's easy and convenient. Keeping track of your water intake and creating healthy meals together will create a bond that no one can take away. Cutting in half high calorie and fat intake such as processed foods, sugar intake, and decreasing the portion size on your plate helps significantly. Setting goals and checking them off the list once completed will give the child a sense of motivation. The variations of physical activity are endless, they can be as simple as taking the dog for a walk or chores like cutting the grass or they can be as fun as a Zumba class.

The child must feel safe and secure doing any physical activities which might take a while to warm up too. Make sure you give them reassurance of their progress and how far they've come. Reducing the screen time provided by any device with outdoor activities helps the child become more active and social. This will help keep the child on their toes and will strive to join some sort of sport or an extra after school activity.

School policies and government programs should be a part of the curriculum in every district across the country. School policies shouldn't allow sugary beverages in the school's vending machine or high calorie snacks. Enforcing students to learn about the risk of obesity, how to avoid it and its long-term effects. Back in 2010, former first lady Michelle Obama shined light on this controversy topic and started a campaign Lets Move. This programs goal is to solve and challenge childhood obesity. Another government program is Choose My Plate, it goes deeper into the five food groups we should consume every day, they're many resources ranging from eating on a budget and the necessary tools for achieving a healthy lifestyle.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Childhood Obesity Has Become An Epidemic. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Childhood Obesity and my Entrepreneurial Idea

Abstract

America is one of the countries in the world with the highest rates of childhood obesity. Various databases register over 13.7 million victims struggling with the health challenge. As a public health matter, various attempts have been made to help to stop or reduce the rising number of obese children. Notably, secondary and tertiary levels have commonly been used. Therefore, it is vital to create a health promotion model that relies on primary and secondary levels of obesity prevention. However, the model is built in line with Evidence-Based Research and Practice (EBP) including the components and the Evidence Research Practice (EBP) model itself. If you were to turn the plan into a potential business, resources will need to be collected, objectives and goals established. To sustainably operate this idea, shareholders will be paramount, and more effort placed in outreach activities to guide parents and monitor the child's progress will be needed.

Childhood Obesity and My Entrepreneurial Idea

Childhood obesity is best understood as a health challenge that affects both children and teenagers. It is known to occur due to the existence of too many fats within the body. For a child to be declared obese, he or she must be overweight beyond the medically required normal measurement (CDC, 2018). However, age is also an important factor in determining if a child is in fact obese. This health challenge is noted to be on the gradual increase in the United States. Various strategies are hereby required to combat it. There are many public health initiatives that have been undertaken. Five prevention levels have been streamlined and they include the primary, secondary, tertiary, quaternary and primordial levels of disease prevention.

However, the most common types of prevention levels are the first three. In this paper it will review childhood obesity as it gradually rises in the United States and then propose the creation of an entrepreneurial plan in form of a health promotion that will be aimed at reducing it or if possible solving the challenge completely.

There are possibilities of other health challenges occurring in the due course of the health promotion program. This significantly alters the goal thus interfering with the child's results. Other health promotion components include advocacy and the emphasis on proper nutrition for obese children. In adherence to the outlined health promotion components in line with an evidenced-based research (EBR), it is more likely that the challenge can be reduced (Levels of Prevention, 2013).

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the latest statistics show that 18.5% is a general prevalence of obesity in the United States with an approximated 13.7 million teenagers and children combined. This is only among children and teenagers between the ages of 2 and 19 years. To be exact, obesity of children between the ages of 2 and 5 years cover a total of 13.9% and children between the ages of 6 and 11 are 18.4%. If we are to take into consideration the various ethnicities, the prevalence of the disease is most common among the Hispanic with 25.8% in comparison to the 22% among the non-Hispanic blacks.

To address the matter above, a health promotion plan is required. First, the components of a health promotion plan must be identified. To begin with, goal setting is foremost to understand the direction of the health program. Here, the goal is to gradually reduce the weight of these obese children. This must be focused on solving childhood obesity as the core problem. During the initial training, the child's parents/caretakers must be advised on the importance of healthy eating habits instead of stopping the child from specific diets or foods (Public Health & its Five Levels of Prevention, 2016).

Parents must also learn and understand the psychological impact that some obese children can suffer from. Healthy, open communication must be introduced to deal with any resulting issues, for example isolation or depression. A child must feel as though the issue is being taken care of. The health promotion component of physical activity must be handled with ultimate concern. A child that is obese needs exercise to promote health. Another component of health promotion among obese children is the fact that the victim's health must be maintained.
To support the health promotion for childhood obesity which is on the rise, it is required to suggest an evidence-based model that supports it.

An evidence-based model is explained as a systematic framework availed for nurses to integrate well-articulated interventions that are clinically evidenced with ethical inclusions (CDC, 2018). One example of an Evidence-Based Model is the Parents as Teachers (PAT) model. This type of model offers the simple and visual elaboration of the parents as teachers of their own child. (Morshed et al., 2018). The parents as teachers model comprise of 4 key components that interrelate with each other. For example, a one-on-one with the parent and the child. Here, home visits are done to ensure that results are being attained. Others include group connections, Health and developmental screening for the obesity stricken child, and lastly, a resource-oriented network for the affected families.

Relating the identified Evidence-Based Practice model (EBP) to the health promotion model under creation, the two concepts potentially address the public health challenge as both primary and secondary levels of disease prevention. The suggested PAT model offers parents an avenue to teach their own children matters concerning living a healthy life (Morshed et al., 2018). As a primary prevention for the health promotion strategy, talking to children out of depression as a component of health promotion is a paramount move.

Parents must be taught that for their obese children to revive their health, they should gain or rather maintain weight slowly instead of losing it at once. Relating this to the health maintenance components of the health promotion program, the program becomes viable if the rules are followed. The PAT evidenced-based model offers regular visitations to parents and their obese children purposely to monitor progress. The attribution training component of the health promotion program demands parents to embrace the facts and beliefs that the children can potentially get better under their own guidance. Precisely, the increasing obesity challenge among children in the United States can be outplayed by using the outlined health promotion strategy under the PAT Evidence-Based Practice. Interventions for childhood obesity yield more results when parents are involved.

Implementing a Plan to Help Reduce Childhood Obesity

In order to reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity in the United States, a streamlined health promotion plan must be implemented. The objectives of the health promotion are to involve parents in the due process of reducing obesity among the diagnosed children to 5 percent. Here, out of the 50 states in America, there are 24 others already with the program. This implies that 26 other states do not have PAT health promotion programs running (Morshed et al., 2018). Therefore, the 26 states are the potential markets in which the health promotion can be launched for the operation to reduce the increasing numbers of childhood obesity cases. The collaborating partners are the professional regulatory body known as NNA, the Ottawa Charter Groups who venture in creating supportive environments for health development, and the parent's union who must undertake the overall responsibility. The health promotion program addresses the health people 2020 which focusses on the planned action to reduce the obesity prevalence amongst the United States population.

Entrepreneurial Component

Nursing entrepreneurship is a business-oriented concept that identifies a nurse or group whose interest falls in offering nursing services in a legal but financially beneficial manner. Here, nurses use their own creativity to develop unique concepts that help in providing solutions (International Council of Nurses, n.d). However, a nurse entrepreneur's services must revolve around healthcare products or services under the regulatory system such as the National Nurse Association (NNA). Before venturing into the nursing fraternity, a nurse is expected to consider the legally defined legitimacy, credibility from society and the operating conditions.

The Business or Component to Institute

Every nurse is trained to serve the interests of the childs and other stakeholders within health facilities. However, today, nurses have moved out of their comfort zone to create and innovate concepts that enhance the quality of healthcare services which are offered for a financial return. For example, a plan for the health promotion program if successfully implemented potentially addresses the public health issue of obesity in the United States (International Council of Nurses, n.d). The business component for the health promotion business plan will be established facilities across various states with a kid's gym, PAT departments and a highly qualified inspection team to conduct follow-ups, create partnerships with schools purposely to reach out to the victims easily, and a counseling team. T

he purpose of the health promotion plan is to fight the socially prevalent obesity among children at an affordable cost for every victim to afford. The mission of the plan is to equip parents with basic skills to manage obesity stricken children in families with genetically recurring situations. The goal is to arrive at an obesity-free and productive future generation. Resources can be raised from donations, proprietor capital worth 50,000 US Dollars for the first five establishments. Sustaining the venture will be through annual shareholder advertisements and outreach actions to find and train parents besides monitoring child progress.

Conclusion

To conclude, childhood obesity is understood as a persistently rising health challenge in the United States of America. Statistics show that over 13.7 million children and teenagers are struggling with obesity. As a public health challenge, it is noted that the most strategic preventive action is done by applying a health promotion which incorporates both primary and secondary preventive levels. The promotional components are integrated with the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) which later n derives a comprehensive health promotion model such as the Parents as Teachers (PAT) model.

To implement the health promotion model, the objective, goal, sustainability, population and many other factors are explained. Nursing entrepreneurs nowadays creatively innovate solutions for childs at a fee. Regarding the above health promotion model, a plan to make a business out of it is streamlined and explained in details. However, sustainability simply lies within outreach activities and shareholder advertisements.

References

  • CDC. (2018, August 13). Childhood Obesity Facts | Overweight & Obesity | CDC. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html
  • International Council of Nurses (n.d). Guidelines on the Nurse Entre/ Intrapreneur Providing Nursing Service, Retrieved from https://www.ipnig.ca/education/Guidelines-NurseEntre-ICN.pdf
  • Levels of Prevention [Video file]. (2013, May 29). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=TlGe80Mi85U&app=desktop
  • Morshed, A. B., Tabak, R. G., Schwarz, C. D., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2018). The Impact of a Healthy Weight Intervention Embedded in a Home-Visiting Program on Children's Weight and Mothers' Feeding Practices. Journal of nutrition education and behavior.
  • Public Health & its Five Levels of Prevention [Video file]. (2016, February 26). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgyN9Xotpw0&feature=youtu.be
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Childhood Obesity and My Entrepreneurial Idea. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

American Obesity

Abstract

As a Nutrition major, I have always wondered, Why is it that in the last few decades, people around the world have been increasing in weight, especially in America? From 1990 to 2018, American obesity has grown from being 11% of the population to 35% (The State of Obesity). Why do some people have such a hard time losing weight, while others have to work really hard to even gain a few pounds?
So, what exactly is obesity? Obesity is defined as having a BMI (Body Mass Index) over 30, and is considered a chronic disease that increases the risk of a variety of health conditions. This includes, but is not limited to: insulin resistance, diabetes, high blood pressure, gallstones, stroke, heart attack, osteoarthritis, and even cancer (Balentine).

The location of fat on the body can increase these risks; generally, more abdominal fat means a higher risk. Storing fat in the abdomen is known as an apple shape, while storing fat in the hips and legs is a pear shape. The waist to hip ratio, which is found by dividing the measurement of the smallest part of your waist by that of widest part of your hips, is used to assess the increased risk of obesity related diseases. If the ratio is greater than or equal to 0.8 for women or 1.0 for men, their risk for obesity related diseases is elevated (Balentine).
In order to understand this obesity epidemic, we must first understand what causes obesity in the first place. Although there is definitely an influence from people's personal actions, it turns out obesity is not purely a consequence of an individual's choices; there are genetically predetermined factors that impact one's likelihood of gaining weight.

One study used identical twins to test if genetics play a role in one's weight and fat distribution. Twelve pairs of twins were given a one thousand calorie a day surplus over the course of one hundred days for six days per week. It turns out each twin's weight gain and fat distribution was similar within pairs, but varied between the twelve different sets (Bouchard). These findings are very significant, because they demonstrate just how much one's body composition, location of fat distribution, and metabolic rate can vary based on genetics.

One's ethnicity, gender, hormone levels, and childhood weight, all of which are influenced by genetics, play a role in the likelihood of becoming obese. African Americans and Hispanics, women especially, have a tendency to put on more weight earlier in life; this is most likely a result of differences among cultures relating to food. People who are overweight in their 20s have a higher chance of becoming obese in their late 30s. Generally, the earlier the person is overweight in their life, the more likely they will become obese later on. Women are more likely to become obese because of their tendency to put on more weight due to hormones such as estrogen (Balentine).

Although heredity does play a significant role, the foods people eat in America have a great impact on obesity. Lots of sugary, calorie dense, man-made junk foods are marketed to the public, and sometimes they can be very hard to resist. The low nutrient profile in these foods makes people feel full less quickly, often causing them to overeat, filling up on too many calories and not enough protein, fat, or complex carbohydrates (Gunnars). The aggressive marketing of junk food companies does not help either.

Advertising for many junk food items is aimed towards children, who do not yet have enough knowledge to make conscious, informed decisions about what they eat, and they get addicted to sugar at a young age. Countless digital marketing ads are portrayed through phones, games, and social media to children and adolescents. In 2008, the food industry spent about $10 billion per year in marketing to children, according to the Federal Trade Commission (Toxic Food Environment). Certain junk food products are advertised as being healthy, with labeling that claims they are beneficial to the body in some way, when in reality they are not healthy.

Many companies slap labels on their products such as all natural, multigrain, sugar free, fat free, light, among many others (16 Most Misleading Food Labels). These claims can even trick adults into thinking that they are buying a healthy product (Gunnars). For example, cereals such as Honey Nut Cheerios may claim that they are whole grain, low fat, contain all 12 vitamins and minerals, are a good source of iron and calcium, and that they may reduce the risk of heart disease and lower cholesterol (Honey Nut Cheerios | Gluten Free Oat Cereal), but they are still high in sugar and have little protein per serving. Children must be taught at a young age about the importance of fruits and vegetables in the diet, and to limit sugary items.

As a result of consuming so many high sugar, calorie dense foods, people can develop insulin resistance. Insulin is a hormone in the body that regulates the conversion of energy into fat versus being utilized elsewhere in the body. In a person who is insulin resistant, the body does not register when enough of the hormone has been made, and continues making more of it; this causes more energy to be stored as fat instead of used by the body. In order to prevent high insulin levels or insulin resistance, one must not eat an excessive amount of refined carbohydrates and have a good amount of fiber (Gunnars).

People can also become resistant to the hormone leptin, another possible cause of weight gain. Leptin is responsible for reducing appetite when the body has a sufficient amount of fat stored. However, in obese individuals, leptin cannot be registered by the brain because it is unable to cross the blood-brain barrier. This results in an unsatiated appetite, even with plenty of fat storage. Leptin resistance is the most common initiator of fat and weight gain that causes individuals to become obese (Gunnars).
The environment in which people live and work greatly impacts what they eat, and in turn, the likelihood of becoming obese. This includes both physical and social surroundings, such as living as a family, being at work or school, and where a person lives (Toxic Food Environment).

Families influence the way their children eat in several ways. The foods provided at home impact what children will like as adults. Eating together as a family influences a healthier diet for the child if the parents provide fruits and vegetables at the dinner table. However, some low income families cannot afford to buy healthier foods such a fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, and the unhealthier options such as pre-made meals are much cheaper and convenient. Many low income parents are single, working full time, and do not have the time to cook healthy meals (Toxic Food Environment).

The workplace of adults also has an effect on food choices and likeliness to gain weight. Usually, unhealthy options from vending machines, or the huge box of donuts a co-worker brought in, are readily available to be consumed. Stress and fatigue from too much work can also cause people to exercise less and work more, which leads to less calories being burned and potential weight gain (Toxic Food Environment).
While the workplace environment affects the diets of adults, the same goes for children in school. Many schools, albeit having a National School Lunch program, do not have the healthiest choices for kids. Junks foods are sold outside the National School Lunch program, making them known as competitive food. These may include chips, candy, and sugary drinks that many kids are drawn towards (Toxic Food Environment).

The neighborhood where one lives also affects the accessibility of food. Many people, mostly low-income families, are located in food deserts, or areas with limited access to supermarkets. Instead, they have greater access to convenience stores, which usually do not have as much variety as supermarkets and contain mostly processed foods (Toxic Food Environment). This leads to people in food deserts having less nutrient dense diets. There is a great need for healthier options to be accessible to everyone.

Another factor that could be contributing to the obesity epidemic is the way our society treats obese people. There has long been a stigma that people who are obese are lazy, unmotivated, and careless. But this is not always the truth. Putting down obese people only makes them feel badly about themselves and exacerbates the problem. A study done by Brenda Major and others demonstrates the effects of such a weight stigma on women. Women were randomly selected to read an article that was either related to weight stigma or something completely unrelated. Overall, the women who were exposed to the weight stigma article felt worse about themselves and were therefore less motivated to make changes. In particular, it made women who felt they were overweight consume more calories. So, weight stigma is not motivating people to change themselves, but only making them feel more hopeless.

The weight stigma is also evident in the health care system. Many doctors are guilty of not taking their obese patients seriously when they have a problem, assuming they just need to lose weight to feel better. Take for example, Sarah Bramblette's experience with a doctor when she started experiencing hip pain. Sarah was over four hundred pounds, and when the doctor came to assess her hip issue, he said, Let me cut to the chase. You need to lose weight. Without any further examination other than her physical appearance, he wrote down on her list of symptoms obesity pain. Sarah was dumbfounded. She made an appointment with another doctor, one who actually diagnosed her, and discovered she had a scoliosis progression (Kolata, Why Do Obese Get Worse Care?).

A study performed in 2001 at the Texas Medical Center of Houston provided evidence that doctors do not treat overweight and obese individuals the same as patients who are not. 122 physicians were evaluated on how they treated average weight, overweight, or obese patients, all of whom had the same ailment. The results were that the physicians spent less overall time with the overweight and obese patients than the average weight ones (Hebl). With obesity rates continually growing, physicians need to change the way they view obese or overweight individuals, and start taking their needs as seriously as any other patient's.

Additional problems affect the quality of medical treatment obese people receive. One of these problems is that there are no calculated dosages of medication for obese people. All of the dosage guidelines are assumed for people at a healthy weight. Another is that the majority of MRI's are not large enough to contain an obese person, forcing doctors to have to give up the diagnosis. Lastly, many procedures are not done on obese people. For example, surgeons are not willing to perform knee surgeries on people with a BMI over 40. This is because working on heavier individuals increases the chance of a surgical complication, and doctors don't want to risk a negative effect on their surgical success rate. This situation is not ideal when the majority of people with joint problems are overweight or obese. All of these roadblocks to treatment are not fair for obese people, and changes must be made to accommodate their needs (Kolata,Why Do Obese Get Worse Care?).

Despite the bad rap obesity has for increasing the risk of certain health implications, it is actually possible for a person to be classified as obese and still be metabolically healthy. In other words, their metabolism, or the rate the body burns calories through the chemical processes that occur within, is at a normal, healthy rate. These individuals are defined as MHO, or Metabolically Healthy Obese. One possibility of being considered MHO is if your BMI is above 30, but you are muscular and physically fit. Positive lifestyle habits, such as a nutrient rich diet, exercise, not smoking, and a moderate consumption of alcohol can play a role in a person's categorization as metabolically healthy obese. Currently, there are no specific criteria for classifying MHO. Some possible ways to determine MHO could include one's waist circumference, blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood sugar levels, insulin resistance, and physical fitness. Approximately thirty-five percent of obese people are classified as MHO (Nordqvist). This is quite a lot of the obese population, so it would be important to know how to distinguish the difference between the metabolically healthy and the metabolically unhealthy. Such knowledge could result in a better understanding of how to treat obesity.

The way many obese people approach weight loss is another issue with the obesity epidemic. It is common for people to lose weight too quickly, as can be seen on the television show America's Biggest Loser. Kevin Hall, Senior Investigator at the National Institute of Health in Washington, was interested in seeing what happened to the Season 8 contestants post show. Hall monitored their weight and metabolic rate for 6 years after the end of the show, and the results were shocking.

Most of the contestants had gained back much of their original weight, some even more. Not only that, but their metabolisms were slower than when they first started (Kolata, After the Biggest Loser).
Danny Cahill, the winner of Season 8, lost a whopping 239 pounds, going from 430 pounds down to 191. However, in the years after the contest, the pounds came back rather quickly. After the six-year study, Danny had gained back 100 of the pounds he had lost, ending at 295 pounds with a decreased metabolism, burning about 800 calories less than the average person his weight. Why, after all his hard work, did the pounds just pile back on? (Kolata, After the Biggest Loser)

It seems that Danny's body is fighting back against the damage he has done by losing an extreme amount of weight in a short period of time. The more successful you are at losing weight, the slower your metabolism will be, and the more hungry you'll be, says Hall. As Danny lost weight, his metabolism decreased, making it very difficult to maintain the final weight he achieved. Levels of the hormone leptin, responsible for controlling hunger, also decreased, making Danny feel extremely hungry on the low calorie diet that was necessary to maintain his new weight.

To avoid feeling constantly hungry, Danny had to eat more food. But, with such a lowered metabolic rate, his body could not maintain his new weight, so he continued to put on more pounds (Kolata, Biggest Loser). It's like asking someone to hold their breath, you can do it for awhile, but it's very difficult to do it for much longer than a minute or two, Hall explains.

Some scientists believe the body goes through a famine mechanism, in which the body responds to rapid weight loss by reducing metabolic rate and leptin levels in an attempt to hold onto and put back on as much weight as possible to return the body to homeostasis. The body reacts as if it were in an extreme crisis with limited availability of food, lowering the metabolic rate and leptin levels as a mechanism of survival (Kolata, Biggest Loser). The metabolisms of the Biggest Loser contestants had no time to adjust to the extreme caloric deficit they experienced.

Rebecca and Daniel Wright, two other Biggest Loser contestants who also gained weight back post show, have a new plan of action to keep the weight off for good. Instead of dramatically reducing calories right away, they are gradually reducing the number of calories they eat per day. This way, their bodies are adjusting slowly to the change in diet without registering it as as a threat to survival.
Besides a gradual decrease in calories, other advice for successful weight loss recommended by Susan Biali, M.D., is to avoid extreme dieting, enjoy the foods you eat, and make realistic changes you know you can make a part of your lifestyle. Extreme dieting, like what was done on America's Biggest Loser, has a yo-yo effect, and is not sustainable. It only promotes stress and deprivation, and makes the dieter feel as if they failed.





Did you like this example?

Cite this page

American Obesity. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

President Donald Trump on Immigration

INTRODUCTION

I. GAIN ATTENTION: What makes America great? Is it our ideals of freedom, equality, and self-government? Is it our fast-evolving technology or military? Or is it in the foundational principles we teach our children in school and at home? Our values, beliefs, or cultural diversity and the openly encouraged ideas of individualism and self-expression? Is America actually great? Were we ever truly?

II. SPEECH THESIS: President Donald Trump's view of immigration is not synonymous to the foundations of America, or what is best for our country.

III. ESTABLISH CREDIBILITY: Robert F. Kennedy stated, Our attitude towards immigration reflects our faith in the American ideal. We have always believed it possible for men and women who start at the bottom to rise as far as the talent and energy allow. Neither race nor place of birth should affect their chances.

BODY

IV. Past


A. Our Founding Fathers did not declare independence based on English nationalism, but simply to establish a people's republic an equal standing ground. What brought the 13 colonies together into a nation was the united commitment to a moral principle, said by Thomas Jefferson that is this:

  • We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

B. This is the heart of the culture of America and synonymous to why we were founded. This idea also forms our national culture and is what makes the United States a seemingly approachable and accessible dream of not just an American citizenship, but an American identity.


C. In 1858, Abraham Lincoln stated that anyone who believed in the principles laid by our Founding Fathers, who felt that the moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their relation to those mens have a right to claim it as though they were blood of the blood, and flesh of the flesh of the men who wrote that Declaration, and so they are.


D. Throughout human history, blood relation has always defined belonging and not belonging. The idea that all one needed to belong was commitment to political ideals and an oath of citizenship was something unheard of in all of history, and a completely revolutionary but foreign concept.


V. Present


A. Immigration policy, specifically illegal immigration to the United States, was the signature point of focus for President Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Donald Trump promised that if he was elected President of the United States, he would end all illegal immigrant access to our country, specifically by building a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, and he still stands by that promise today.

  • The problem with this is, instead of solely focusing on illegal immigration, President Donald Trump is trying to tackle immigration as a whole. According to an article written by The New York Times, the President has regularly smeared [all] immigrants as terrorists and criminals. (Trump's Backward View of Immigration. The New York Times. 2018)
  • This stereotype could not be any farther from the truth. While this is true for few immigrants, most do not have a negative impact on our country or its economy. They are denied citizenship simply for trying to seek a better life. Those that achieve their dream of something greater than where they come from end up being entrepreneurs and small business owners that help our economy rather than hurt it.

B. During an October rally, Donald Trump stated, You know what I am? I'm a nationalist.

  • When discerning President Trump's brand of nationalism, we see that there is nothing truly American about it. He never speaks on the ideals expressed in the language of our Founding Fathers liberty, rights, equality, freedom, democracy, justice and he clearly never speaks on fulfilling what our Founders promised would ultimately make American great for all.
  • His idea is derived from one thing alone the power of winning. He chooses to blame foreigners for our country's problems and insists that removing them is the only solution and ultimate win for America.

C. This has led to the worrying reality that he has not offered any reliable solutions to America's real issues, and his desire to defeat has resulted in dismissal of our country's foundational values.

  • His focus, solutions, and resources disproportionately remain on protectionism of foreign imports, corporate outsourcing, and immigrant labor by using strategies that have negatively impacted our country in the past.
  • He disregards our American principles, and stirs only hatred, anger, and ill-driven passion. As a result of this, many hate groups and white nationalists, who see themselves as the only ones with the right background to be real Americans, have gravitated towards President Donald Trump's campaign.
  • A number of controversial policies have been put into place during President Trump's presidency so far, and he has targeted programs to better the immigration process, including asylum protections overturned, separating families at the border, phasing out Temporary Protected Status (TPS), H-1B visa restrictions, the lowest level of extended family visa restrictions in more than 10 years, rescinding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the border wall, and his process of moving forward to revoke President Barack Obama's Dream Act.
  • An article written for The New York Times states that President Donald Trump has a nativist, zero-sum view that what is good for immigrants is bad for America. That view runs counter not just to the best of American tradition and principles, but to evidence of what's best for the country. (Trump's Backward View of Immigration. The New York Times. 2018)

VI. Future


A. According to President Donald Trump in a 2009 speech, They say all men are created equal. [But] it's not true. Some people are born very smart, and some people are born not so smart. Tangibly he is correct, but ultimately, he is missing the true meaning of the Declaration of Independence: that all people have the same moral worth, natural rights, and are entitled to equal citizenship and treatment under America's law.


B. The President's nationalist program will not achieve its long-term security, and it throws away America's dearest ideals in favor of gaining power by beating everyone on the world scale, particularly immigrants, foreigners, and partners of abroad trade instead of finding a common ground and working together.


C. There are several ways to improve and update the immigration process in order to better protect our country, and to make the process easier for people who are simply searching for a better life:

  • More visas.
  • Better monitoring of immigration to ensure the safety of our country and also to improve the economy.

D. America is great for many reasons: freedom, opportunity, democratic process, celebration of expression, cultural diversity, technological advances, and much more.


E. In our history, America was great for many reasons: when we gave back all the lands we liberated in World War 2, and when we spent billions of dollars to save Europe from Soviet communism and rebuild it. We were great before becoming the rich and powerful nation we are today: when we declared equality for all people in 1776 and made steps in 1865 to the ending of slavery and guarantee of complete civil rights in the 1960s.


F. As a continuation of that, we will need a leader who does not base his thoughts solely on victories, defeats, and humiliations. We will need a leader who is smart. Realistic. Strategic. Diplomatic but bold. Someone who has a true love for this country and who recognizes our founding principles and moral ideals, as well as their central importance in allowing us a national pride that is uniquely our own in the world. A pride that is for everyone, regardless of race, color, ethnicity, gender, background, religion, political standpoint, or any other differences.


G. If our nation were to stop believing in those founding principles, we would cease to truly be America.

CONCLUSION

A. If you believe in our country's foundation, in celebrating a world of pride in diversity and culture, and that America was already great before President Donald Trump's immigration reform, the steps you take toward action will be what drastically reshapes our country into what it was always meant to be. George Washington once said, I had always hoped that this land might become a safe and agreeable asylum to the virtuous and persecuted part of mankind, to whatever nation they might belong.

  1. I encourage all of you to go out and vote. Educate yourselves on policies and real facts, and research them for yourselves instead of relying on the news or other people to do it for you. If you know someone who is an immigrant, talk to them and hear their story, because it may change some of your opinions.
  2. I agree with views from both the Republican and Democratic party. I believe there are things that need to be changed regarding our immigration process. That is why I urge all of you to vote, not for a specific party because that is what you have grown up identifying with, but for the person. Listen to each individual person running and vote for what you feel is right. You may not think that your voice matters, but it does. Your one vote could be what turns the tables of our government.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

President Donald Trump on Immigration. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The First Lady of Civil Rights

Rosa Parks

Violence was brought against many peaceful black protesters upset Americans. Many people got injured and killed protesting for the bus boycott. After a long day at work Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat to a white man on a segregated bus in December 1, 1955. She then was escorted out of the bus by a police officer and then arrested.
Rosa Parks worked as a seamstress. She went on the Cleveland Avenue bus for home. She sat in a seat in the first of many rows for "colored" passengers.After Rosa Parks was arrested, many other African American people immediately started a bus boycott held by African Americans on December 5 to stop segregation.

The U.S. Congress has called her "the first lady of civil rights" and "the mother of the freedom movement" after her role in the Civil Rights Movement. She stopped racial segregation for all African Americans.
A newspaper reporting about Rosa parks. Rosa parks arrest report. Rosa parks protesting. Rosa parks on a non segregated bus. A police officer recording Rosa parks fingerprints

Triumph


In Montgomery, Alabama Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the Montgomery bus to a white man. Rosa Parks violated an Alabama segregation law but she stood up for herself and other African American people. Rosa Parks had a big role in the Civil Rights Movement.Rosa Parks was given the nickname The Mother Of Civil Rights Movement she helped stopped racial segregation for all African American people within a year. Rosa Parks helped all African American have a voice on their equal rights. Rosa Parks received national recognition. Parks received many awards like the NAACP's 1979 Spingarn Medal, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the Congressional Gold Medal, and a occurring statue in the United States Capitol National Statuary Hall. Upon her death in 2005, she was the first woman and third non-US government official to lie in honor in the Capitol Rotunda.

Tragedy


Lots of people got injured and got killed while protesting for Parks and the bus boycott. Racist police officers, sheriffs, fire hoses, police dogs and Klan violence was brought against many peaceful black protesters upset Americans. Many African American people still got treated and judged by people over the time. After the boycott Rosa Parks got arrested from her first job as a seamstress and received many death threats from many people. The people who worked with Rosa Parks like Martin Luther King Jr., Edger Nixon received many death threats. Sadly Martin Luther King Jr. was killed after being shot while standing up on his balcony outside by James Earl Ray. In Rosa Parks final year of life she suffered from dementia at the age of 92.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The First Lady Of Civil Rights. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Mother of the Civil Rights Movement

The Mother of the Civil Rights Movement Rosa Parks is one of the most famous people in the history of the American Civil Rights movement, for her refusal to move to the back of the bus, on December 1, 1955. Although her moment of protest was not a planned event, it certainly proved to be a momentous one. The nature of Rosa Park's protest, the response of the authorities of Montgomery, the tactics adopted by the civil rights leaders in Montgomery, and the role eventually played by Federal authority, were all aspects of this particular situation that were to be repeated again and again in the struggle for equality of race.

Rosa Park's thesis and view on civil rights, how she contributed to creating them, also the boycott, and her life story. At the age of 42, when she boldly defied Jim Crow laws by refusing to give up her seat to a white rider on a segregated bus in 1955. The act catalyzed the historic 381-day Montgomery bus boycott and stirred the nation's conscience. Yet Parks has a more complex personality than is suggested by her shy, soft-spoken public persona, Brinkley reveals. Despite a humble, fatherless childhood in rural Alabama, she quickly distinguished herself as a tireless worker with the local NAACP, devoting her energies to area youth groups, recording the problems of victims of hate crimes and participating in the organization's major state conferences.

Brinkley (The Unfinished Presidency, etc.) pinpoints the origins of Parks's strength and strong social commitment as he details the legalized segregation that tainted every aspect of Southern life. His short, compelling scenes rivet the reader, although some merely expand on previously disclosed events, such as the wave of jealousy and backbiting among Parks's peers, her resurgence in Detroit politics as an aide to Representative John Conyers and the savage beating and robbery that almost took her life in 1994.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Mother of the Civil Rights Movement. (2019, Mar 22). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Knowledge about Faith and Science

What is the key to a successful knowledge in means of faith and science? How can assistance be that key to successful learning? In compliance with philosophy, people view faith andscience with different perspectives. Some may think that faith brings upon atrue reality, while others believe more in reasoning and logic. Faith may be portrayed as a tree that branches out with different opinions; one main topic can bring upon many different subtopics. Religiously, some people view faith asa belief and trust in God and His acts. Others may see faith as the exact opposite of logical reasoning, but not to a religious extent. Empirical scienceis the reliance on logical reasoning and evidence and this concept main lyconsists of people who believe that faith cannot bring a true reality, but scientific facts and observations can create that true reality. Although, these two concepts often contradict each other, there are ways that the topics have beneficially influenced each other towards a true reality. How can faith and science be considered beneficial when striving for truth? Perceptions of faith have altered over the past couple ofcenturies.

Philosophers continuously create different outlooks and contradictions to the ideas of others. Views of faith have become more detailed and specific with new ideas emerging from prior opinions. One philosopher, Soren Kierkegaard, brought upon the idea of existentialism, which can be defined as people containing the free-will to define themselves. Kierkegaard thoughts offaith in terms of leap of faith meaning that when given a difficult choice, aperson may have to take a chance when choosing a side, and then endure the possible consequences of that decision (Faith and Reason: Kierkegaard's Legacyn.pag). Science has its similarities and differences with views on faith. Emerging from empirical science, is the well-known scientific method. The scientific method is a scientific discovery that turned minds once again to materialism.(Velasquez 158). The scientific method begins with a fact, or a claim that contradicts some theories from philosophers. The method continues to go through many steps to narrow the focus of the subject to analyze and observe any empirical proof or evidence, and come to a final conclusion. Some people view science evidence as the only way to reach the truth, others believe that faithis the only path to a true reality, and then some others believe science and faith assist each other when looking for a true reality. The concepts faith and empirical science may conflict with each other many times, but in some ways they have proven to work together while striving for a true reality.

What are the theories empiricism, rationalism, and foundationalism and what do the concepts consist of? Empiricism determines a person's knowledge by personal sense experiences. Empiricism's development was assisted by the following philosophers: John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume. Locke believed, to an extent, that empiricism was a great theory because he thought that smaller and simpler ideas could be pieced together to create a complex idea. In other words, it is similar to putting together smaller pieces of a puzzle to create one large picture. While empiricism focuses on the theory of true knowledge by sense experience, rationalism is the concept in which aperson's true knowledge is gained by reason and logic. Locke may have agreed with some aspects of empiricism but, ultimately, he sided with the rationalistic theory.

Rationalists commit to ideas of other theories such as skepticism and foundationalism because they contain views that are similar or comply with opinions from rationalism. Most opinions from empiricism do notcomply with the opinions from rationalism, making them almost completely opposing theories (Rationalism vs. Empiricism n.pag.). Foundationalism can bedefined as a view that different concepts are justified because of a continuousroutine. For example, say someone has a piano rehearsal every Thursday. This person has experienced foundationalism because he or she have justified a continuous routine. This explains Similar to faith and science, the theories of empiricism, rationalism, and foundationalism have connections among each otherthat can assist with bringing a true reality forward. When contemplating the theories of foundationalism andlogical positivism, how can these topics influence faith and science? Aspreviously stated, foundationalism is a concept in which acts or judgments arejustified by a pattern or usual routine. This theory is applied to philosophybecause there are patterns that exist when justifying whether a subject is trueor false. (Foundationalist Theories n.pag.).

Acts or steps of faith,religiously speaking, occur such as Baptism, First Communion, and Confirmation.As a Catholic, students go through a process to understand faith and acts ofGod. The process towards confirmation is an example of foundationalism becauseit consists of a usual routine for people from the age newborns to young adultsthat will eventually gain the Christian title. Foundationalism, in philosophy,can determine truth by justifications. The theory influences the belief infaith and science because the number of people that believe in faith willdecrease, and the number of people that believe in science will increase. Manypeople nowadays tend to believe more in empirical proof and science because itis easier. Ultimately, the impact of this pattern of increasing and decreasingnumbers will completely discard faith and science will control the population.Foundationalism complies with rationalism because they both justify an act oropinion by observation instead of belief on its own.

In simpler words, theoriesof science prove a subject as the truth because it can be displayed for others.For the side of faith, a person must only believe the subject is the truthwithout any justifications. Finding the truth with the assistance of faith,proves to be difficult for many people because they cannot physically observethe subject. Logical positivism, alsosimilar to rationalism, is a natural and important role for logic andmathematics and to find an understanding of philosophy (Logical Empiricismn.pag.). Logical empiricism differs from empiricism because logical empiricismis the attempt to understand philosophical theories with reasoning. Empiricism focusesmainly on the development of experience through personal senses. All theories mentioned prior to this point, are complex and entangled. This explains why itis sometimes difficult to prove that faith and science can assist each otherwhen searching for a true reality.

What are the causes and effects of the conflictingconcepts of faith and science? Faith and science can affect many people, notjust the people involved with one side or the other. Since faith has manycomplex ideas, Kierkegaard's is not the only one to contemplate. Regarding thisinformation, Kierkegaard's definition of faith is not the only conflictingconcept. Empiricism relates to faith and it also brings upon many topics that proveto be contradictory. One major conflict that arises from faith is the proof andevidence from science that may discontinue the original concept of faith. If this begins to occur with all topics involved with faith, then the concepts maybe completely forgotten. More people may start discovering empirical proof toconstantly contradict ideas of faith, leading to science controlling most ofthe population. Science does not seem to be endangered even the slightest bit,but levels of faith may begin to drop.

Science, in fact, continues to evolvewhile producing deductive evidence within observations. Faith may not beproviding many new concepts and ideas, but old practices are still functioning(Perception of Conflict... n.pag.). Faith and science continue to conflict witheach other, but neither are at a great risk of withdrawal. Throughout many centuries, ideas and understandings offaith and science have evolved. From Kierkegaard's leap of faithunderstanding to A.J. Ayer and his favorable topic of Logical Positivism, thetwo topics have become much more complex over the years. Logical positivism (orlogical empiricism) can be defined as a statement that is only meaningful ifit is either purely formal or capable of empirical verification (LogicalPositivism n.pag).

In other words, the information must be completelyscientific or it must be justified by faith. This is a big reason as to why theconcept is an issue. Proving a scientific theory wrong with faith is more difficultthan vice versa. A.J. Ayer attempted to understand the problem with inductivereasoning, but was continuously unsuccessful. The issue with inductivereasoning explains why proving a scientific theory false with concepts of faithdoes not function well. Moving from a specific and detailed concept to a morecommon topic does not make much sense. In most cases, faith and sciencechallenge each other, but infrequently, they can assist and truly prove the opposingtopic. Attempting to bring together the topics of faith andscience is difficult, but it can be done.

Difficulty emerges from other philosophicaltheories such as empiricism, rationalism, foundationalism, and logicalpositivism. Many of these theories mainly oppose and falsify faith, which makesthe topics of faith and science even more disconnected. Although, they havethis opposition, there are ways that they prove each correct. As previously stated,there are steps of faith for Christian students. As these students become religiouslyconfirmed, they develop into young adults that will begin their new life. Somemay obtain jobs within scientific fields while still acquiring and portraying religiousfaith. People are the answer as to how faith and science can coexist. Peoplecreate the connections between faith and science and among many other conceptsand this is what brings a true reality.

Works Cited

  1. https://apologetics315.com/2016/09/terminology-tuesday-propositionalism/
  2. https://www1.cbn.com/faith-and-reason-kierkegaards-legacy
  3. https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/22/perception-of-conflict-between-science-and-religion/
  4. https://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_logical_positivism.html
  5. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ayer/
  6. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justep-foundational/
  7. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Knowledge About Faith and Science. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Will Religion and Faith be the Answer to Climate Change?

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to examine how the major world's religions view the environment. Specifically, it will review and discuss the various tenets of each faith and in order to discern how the tenets of each faith dictate encourage or require those that hold that faith to believe, act, or be responsible towards the environment in keeping with their faith. It will describe how each of the faiths following through or acting on their tenets and teachings.

The religions which will be examined include Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. The Christian faith will include two sub-categories for the Evangelical and Catholic faiths. There will be a cursory review of some other religions including Hinduism and Native religions.
In the end, we need to ascertain if religions or persons of different faiths can find enough commonality in their faith to provide the necessary guidance for them to work together in order to protect and conserve the environment and resources that all of humanity needs to survive.

Assumptions:

The main assumption for this paper is that climate change is real. One only has to look at recent news to see there is something going on with the world's climate. Whether it is a recent climate change report issued by the United States government called the National Climate Assessment which includes input, analysis and opinions of more than three hundred scientist, or you look at real time events such as the wildfires in California as the result of a decade of severe drought, they dying Dead Sea which is drying up, as well as the river that borders between El Paso Texas and Mexico, or more people around the world wearing face masks due to the quality of air. Studies have shown that air quality can affect everything from respiration to heart health and diabetes. Some even feel it can impact the incidents of genetic defects or autism rates. It is clear; the world must make changes to protect our must necessary resources, air and water. The poisons and pollutions at humans are putting out into God's creation are endangering those resources necessary us to survive!

Introduction

According to Pew Research, eighty percent of the people in the world identify with a religion. Over fifty-four percent belong to the Christian, Muslim and Jewish faith. Fifteen percent identify with the Hindu faith, and over sixteen percent are not affiliated with any faith, and there is another fourteen percent are spread among other faiths like Buddhism and Folk or Native religions. If eighty percent have as part of their faith foundation that they should be good stewards of the environment, then it should be possible for everyone to come together and solve the climate change issue. In her article about religion and climate change titled Religious Identity, Beliefs and Views about Climate Change, Sonya Sachdeva, stated; Religious perspectives affect how humans see their place in the environment, but environmental features shape religious perspectives as well (1)

Method:

The analysis and conclusions in this paper are based on reading several books, articles, websites and an interview. The research was completed and each of the sources summarized and reviewed. In addition, the material within the sources was identified as either scientific or factual data, or the author's opinion based on their own research, experience and expertise. This paper summarizes the prevailing opinions that agree or commonality that is indicated across the works, or will point out areas where there is a lack of commonality or disagreement about the religious belief or tenet. Lastly, it will examine each faith's source of their perspective from the Bible, Qur'an and Torah to their religious leaders.

Christianity and the Environment

There are many references in the bible pertaining to the environment from which all Christian should hold as a tenet of their faith. There actions should be governed directly by these biblical teachings. Here are a few and it should be noted that they are open to some interpretation. But if the words are taken at face value, it seems evident that God wanted man to be good steward of the earth He created and all living things on it. From the web page Open Bible.Info are the following biblical references;

  • Genesis 3:26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock, and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth"
  • Leviticus in 25:1-55, there is reference to conservation as it tells the people of Israel to rotate their crop every six years allowing the soil and land to rest in the seventh year.
  • Psalms 24: 1-2 says that people will be the stewards of the earth that was created by the Lord our God. The concept of stewardship is mentioned in the Christian and Jewish faiths.
  • Numbers 35:33-34 You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel.

Catholics:

There are so many denominations of Christianity; it is difficult to determine a monolithic view of Christianity and the environment. However, starting with Catholicism, the past two Popes have made clear the teachings of the Catholic faith and the responsibility of all Catholics. Starting with Pope Benedict who said I willingly join in spirit all who are grateful to the Lord for the fruits of the earth and the work of human hands, renewing the pressing invitation to respect our national environment, a precious resource entrusted to our stewardship (Pope Benedict 13).

Pope Benedict believes the negative impact of climate change and a deteriorating environment being more impactful on the poor and the gap between the rich and poor is already widening, dividing them further apart. He also points out that water is the source of life as well as the air, and that a good environment allows more peace as people are not fighting over resources (Pope Benedict 29). Pope Benedict's directive relative to the environment is comprehensive and succinct. He stated: The Church has a responsibility toward creation, and she must assert this responsibility in the public sphere. In so doing, she must defend not only the earth, water and air as gifts of creation that belong to everyone. She must above all protect mankind from self-destruction. (Pope Benedict 109).

Pope Francis wrote the encyclical Laudato Si which is an official church treatise about environment. Pope Francis believes that due to the complexity of the ecological crisis, we need to understand that solutions will not come from interpreting it in one way, but rather we must respect other cultures, faiths, and people so that we can find solutions that are amenable to all of us. (Pope Francis Location 3313 on Kindle).

Evangelical

Evangelicals seem to be quite different from other denominations of Christianity. Even though they use virtually the same bible, they seem to have taken the position that climate change or protecting the environment is a liberal political position, and if they accept and adopt it, they would have to accept other liberal political principles such as gun control. In the Christian Scientist Monitor June 2017 article How Climate Change Became a Question of Faith, authors Harry Bruinius and Amanda Paulson discuss how the National Climate Assessment was released to the press first before it was released by the White House. They did this out of fear that the President and his Administration would undermine the report because President's political based is comprised of evangelicals who do not believe in climate change.

But evangelical meteorologist Paul Douglas who wrote Caring for Creation: The Evangelicals Guide to Climate Change and a Healthy Environment is trying to change that. He explains that that facts and data do matter. He realized climate change was real after becoming a meteorologist (Douglas 13). He uses the bible reference Isaiah's prophetic that said humans will defile the earth and it will dry up. (Douglas 47). The condition of the environment can be considered the perfect problem as it is global, and no one group of people can escape the actions of others. (Douglas 125). When water and air are affected, it will affect all of us regardless of who is causing the pollution because water and air are not contained. Therefore, we all have to work together on this problem.

Judaism and the Environment

Research for how Judaism views the environment started with an interview with Ilana Bofford-Entin. Ms. Entin is an environmentalist, children's book author (Our Earth, Our Friend, Jul 14, 2014), and specialized in communication. She has worked and advised candidates for political office, elected officials, and others on many topics, including environmental policy. She has researched the issues extensively as part of that process.

Ms. Entin responded to the email questions by providing Torah references about the environment. She gave as a starting point, the first chapter of Genesis where it states fill the world and master (rule) it. She mentioned Deuteronomy 19:19-20 in which there is a prohibition against needless destruction and waste. She said that Judaism teaches that during war, fruit bearing trees should not be destroyed and resources should not be used needlessly. Finally, she said the Shulchan Aruch teaches that when someone pollutes the water, they will eventually pay for it.

While the Jewish holy book the Torah provided clear evidence that one role of their faith is to take care of the earth and all that is in it, due to the schisms and splits creating many denominations of Judaism, orthodox, conservative, progressive, it makes it difficult to hear one voice from the faith about how to act with regards to the environment. (Halpert, Judaism and Climate Change, February 29, 2012).

Islam and the Environment

The Islamic faith also has primary religious sources regarding their responsibility to the environment. The Hadith is a report that many Muslims, especially orthodox Muslims, believe includes some of Mohammed's actual words. (Edis Location 33 on Kindle). In addition, the Qur'an also has references to the environment. For instance, To Him belongs every being that is in the heavens and on earth: all are devoutly obedient to Him (Islamicity.org, Qur'an 30:26). Another even more clear and direct reference is So eat and drink of the sustenance provided by Allah, and do no evil nor mischief on the face of the earth. (Islamicity.org, Qur'an 2: 60). Like Christians, who believe to honor all of the creatures God created is necessary to honor God; Muslims believe they have to honor the earth and all life on it to honor Allah. The Qur'an also states each Muslim is a khalifah, or custodian of the earth which again support the responsibility to the environment. (Mohiuddin, The Natural World, Islamicity.org).

Other Religions and the Environment

A cursory review of other religions mentioned in many of the resources used indicate that Hindu, Native Indian or Indigenous populations and other smaller denominations of faith all seem to have tenets of faith that believe the care of the environment is a central theme to their faiths as well. One specific group, indigenous natives or tribes are actually taking action. They are using their legal claims to lands and resources as way to stop pollution, even at the cost of so- called progress.

How the World's Religions Can Work Together to Protect and Conserve the Earth's Environment for all Humanity?

In Sharon Degado's book Love in a Time of Climate Change, she argues that many churches cannot or do not actively try to address or motivate members to change the environment because many believe they cannot really impact the problem with their solutions.
It appears that all of the major faiths in the world have a responsibility according to their holy books and teachings to take care of our planet and hence our environment. However, it is also apparent that each faith is not monolithic relative to what role each human, the group, or their branch or denomination, or overarching church should take relative to this responsibility. This shows that even though religions may have the same beliefs about something based on their holy books and the words of their prophet or God, they also have different perspectives or priorities relative to how to act on that tenet of their faith.

The world's religious leaders are starting to take action to organize and address climate change. They have recognized that political leaders are not willing to do address the issue. For instance, the United States would not sign the Kyoto Protocol in spite of being one of the world's largest polluters. In the past few years many religious leaders have started to convene meetings of faith leaders to discuss how they can work together. As recently as of June of 2018, Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople, leader of three hundred million Christians, told his audience comprised of religious leaders, academics and activists that they needed to move beyond intellectualism when it came to the environment. He stated What remains for us is to preach what we practice, said Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople. Now we must begin the long and difficult way from the mind to the heart. May God guide you in your service to his people and the care of his creation. (Eilperin, WashingtonPost.com, Climate Change, 2018)

The environment has to become a top priority for all faiths, all religions and all spiritual leaders. Only then can they reset priorities to find the common ground necessary to solve our climate change and environmental issues. A first step to understanding and overcoming our differences is to meet in person, talk and listen to one another. In the end, all humans must understand regardless of their faith, that in order to survive, we must take care of our planet and resources that keep us alive, and if everyone can rally around commonalities in their faith, which should be their moral core and determine their values, then humans should use faith as a leader to resolve environmental issues.

Conclusions:

In order to overcome all of that, people will have to listen and learn about each other's religions and faiths in order to have conversations and agree to approaches about protecting our environment together without being offensive to one another. We will need to set aside any differences, and use our commonalities to ensure we act to protect our own survival, as well as be responsible to the teachings of our faith, no matter what faith you are, that we are the stewards of this planet as it was given to use by our own god or gods. Our human survival depends on it.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Will Religion and Faith be the Answer to Climate Change?. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

From Flesh to Faith

When one thinks of an “idol” or a “false god”, many different images can come to mind; images such as: human-like statues, animal-like figures, things made of gold and bronze, money, and items of worth. What doesn’t always come to mind are things like family, friends, popularity, hobbies, electronics, sex, relationships, and the biggest, which is one’s own flesh.? What exactly is an idol then? An idol is literally anything that becomes more important than God. When people think about false gods, the image portrayed is an image of a person bowing down to their false god and worshipping it, which is true. But bowing down and worshipping false gods can be as little as deciding to look at inappropriate content on one’s phone instead of finding satisfaction in God’s Word. It can be choosing to send that inappropriate photo if that’s what it takes to gain approval. And it can be as little as choosing to sleep in instead of waking up early to go to church. These idols may be small, but anything being put before God is seen as big to Him, the Creator of the things one worships.

One can see these idols in their daily lives, but what did idolatry look like in the Israelites Society? What does idolatry look like in American society today? And how do these two completely different societies compare and differ to one another? God speaks a lot about idols and false gods in His Word. In Exodus 20, God speaks to the Israelites and gives them the Ten Commandments. The very first Commandment God speaks on is the commandment of idolatry saying, “You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth” (Bible, ESV, Ex. 20:3-4). God makes it crystal clear that no gods of any shape or size can be put before him Him . God continues by saying, “You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the LORD your God am a jealous God” (Bible, ESV, Ex. 20:5). Not only is God saying not to put anything before Him, but He is saying that they shall not bow down or even serve them. Why is God saying this? The reason God said this is because God is a jealous God.

But if God is perfect and sinless, then how is He a “jealous God”? God can be anything that He wants to be, but in everything He does, He is completely holy and sinless. God isn’t jealous because of something He lacks, wants, or needs. He is a jealous God when His people give to another thing what ultimately and rightly belongs to Him. The Israelites had a habit of turning to other idols and turning their backs on God, even after He delivered them from 400 years of slavery in Egypt. God was with the Israelites and never failed to show them his His sovereignty, yet they were convinced that God was not enough for them, that they needed more. One can see this almost everywhere in American Society today. People live as though God and the world owe them something; and that everything they have is because of something they did to earn it, that they do not need God to guide their steps because they’re fully capable of leading themselves. In the New Testament, Paul says in 1 Corinthians 4:7, “What do you have that you did not receive? If then you received it, why do you boast as if you did not receive it?” (Bible, ESV, 1 Corinthians 4:7). Nothing people have is by their own doing, but by God’s doing. Both the Israelites and America today can be compared to one another because they both tend to fall into worshipping the creations over the Creator. Idols always come back to the prioritized flesh of the individual.

Though Israelite society and American society can relate in many ways, they can also differ in many ways. One can see the differences in their chosen idols. Both societies idols revolve around the flesh and not God, but the Israelites portrayed theirs through the golden calf that they made with their melted rings and earrings. When God sees the Israelites have made an idol and worshipped it for His original works, God spoke to Moses saying, “Go down, for your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves. They have turned aside quickly out of the way that I commanded them” (Bible, ESV, Ex. 32:7-8). The biggest take away from this verse is that idols pull people away from the path that God has set for them, and they pull them away quickly. The Israelites took the exact words of God and put them in the mouth of their golden calf, which shows that not only do idols pull people away from God’s path , but they blind people from seeing and hearing what only God can do and say. A lot of people in American Society don’t exactly make golden calves to worship over God, but the same type of worship can be seen in the way that one lives their daily life.

A very big idol seen today is popularity and desiring the approval of others and wanting that acceptance and worshipping it. This is also known as people pleasing, which can be seen as, people serving; and when one is serving anyone or anything over God, he or she is breaking Gods commandment of not bowing down or serving any other god (Bible, Ex. 20:5). In American society today, the approval of others can be seen as the golden calf that the Israelites worshipped. Society today gives glory not only to the approval of others, but also to the seemingly innocent things, such as cell phones and any electronic devices. Though these devices can make life simpler and more convenient, without a healthy amount of accountability, devices can not only be an idol, but give you the images and freedom to have even more idols all within one. These other idols can range from innocent things such as games, videos, and music, which are all good things in themselves but too much of anything is bad if it is put before God, and even the innocent things, if abused, can become extremely corrupting. Idolatry is a serious matter. It’s very dangerous and can come in all shapes and sizes, and once idolatry becomes a struggle, it will always remain a struggle. One can understand the seriousness of idolatry by just looking at the Israelites in Exodus 32.

They watched as the Lord delivered them from 400 years of slavery, they walked on dry ground through the sea that the Lord divided for them, they watched bread fall from the sky because God knew they were hungry, they even drank water from a rock and yet, they still thought that wasn’t enough for them. Their idols could never do what God had done for them but they still ran to what was only temporary. That’s where society today can look back and gain wisdom. Will this world ever be stripped of its idols? No, not until the Lord comes back. Will idols and false gods try leading people away from Gods path? Yes. Can one fight off these idols alone? No, but God can. That’s where these idols and false gods fall short. A false god who could deliver, would not be created by man who couldn’t deliver himself. For the Israelites, that golden calf could not split the sea for them to walk through. For American Society today, the approval of others cannot provide satisfaction because the worth of one’s self doesn’t belong to anyone but God. Humans are not big enough or strong enough to tear down these idols, but God is and He has already overcome them, people have just built their idols so tall that they cannot see God for who He really is.

People need to realize that only God is enough for them. Nothing or no one can take the place of God in one’s life. True and genuine worship is not viewing God as the one who gives rewards, but viewing God as the Reward. It’s not about what life can give but about what God has already given. Putting these corrupting idols away will require hard work and a lot of sacrifices, maybe even really hard sacrifices such as, relationships, hobbies, the amount of time spent on devices, physical satisfaction, and even friendships. But remember that God sacrificed His own Son so that the people that He loved could have a future and have the freedom to worship the one true God. In order to gain God and his His guidance, one must lose themselves, and their own desires. This may hurt, but God is enough, and He will always be worth losing what was only ever temporary.

Works Cited

Hooper, Jodi. “God Gives the Ten Commandments” https://bible.org/seriespage/7-god-gives-ten-commandments-exodus-20-deuteronomy-5 Published 29 June, 2012

Deffinbaugh, Bob. “Israel’s Worship’ https://bible.org/seriespage/14-israel-s-worship-exodus-201-7 Published 13 May, 2004 ESV Bible. ESV, Crossway, 2016.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

From Flesh to Faith. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Civil Rights and its Role in the Cold War for America

In 1958, Jimmy Wilson would be the center of international attention. After he was sentenced to death in Alabama for stealing less than two dollars in change, Wilson's case was thought to encapsulate the harsh consequences of Americans racism. This in turn brought to the surface international anxiety about the Americans race relations. Because United States was the leader of the free world, racism in the country would be an international concern. Racism has been the talk since before the 18th century. We have seen some many instances where racism has played a major part in the lives of many. But never have we seen it on an international scale. But being that the United States leader of the free world racism brought about a concern from all the nations around small lead to something so controversial. They wanted to know how the American democracy be a lighthouse during the cold war and a model for the people struggling against the Soviet oppression, if America itself practiced brutal discrimination against minorities within its own borders.

This quandary started on July 27, 1957. The details that came to his untimely and cruel hearing were shaky from the start. Mr. Wilson worked for a lady by the name of Estelle Baker, an old dame, in Marion, Alabama. As he told a Toronto reporter. Ms.barker let him in her house one evening, and they got into an argument, which resulted in her throwing some money on the bed. Wilson took the money and left, but it was not even enough for a cab fare. But Baker told a more menacing side to the story and along with him taking her money she claims that he also attempted to rape her, but it was not successful. Wilson was charged with robbery the stealing of $1.95, but with the unauthorized testification of Ms. Baker without any thought Jimmy Wilson was convicted by an all-white jury and was sentenced to death. Since the other nations followed closely with race in the United States with great interest, the Wilson's case without a doubt came to be international news.

People were so disturbed by the thought of a man being put to death by electrocution from the chair for less than two dollars. He got attention from the Voice of Ethiopia, and Ashanti pioneer, as well as being widely publicized in West Africa. This led to businessmen of America calling the U.S. embassy in Monrovia to express their concerns about Wilson's convictions. Even an Norwegian housewife sent a letter expressing her sympathy Jimmy and plead lenience for him. There were even some extreme concerns for Mr. Jimmy in one instance the threatened the U.S. embassy that if Wilson was executed then the U.S. ambassador would not survive either. Even a spokesperson for the NAACP said it would be a sad blot on the nation if Wilson was executed. He also called that the communist would take the headline and run with it and they did exactly that. The communist newspaper in Rome. L'Unita, called the death sentence a new revolution crime by the United States segregationist while under the headline This Is America. This ruling had got more than enough attention for the judge to change his might and dismiss the case and the ruling. But why did it need to go this far for the people of Alabama to realized how unfair their ruling was.

America's justice system has not change much since the 1950's. We constantly today see the black community slip faster into prison than they do into a decent job. The choice for them the go to jail provides money for the government and they could care less about whether or not a black man is treated fair and equal. The 6th and 8th amendment were created for equality, but it seemed as though it brought no effect to the right of an African American. There was in the least no need for a man to be killed because he took approximately 2 dollars which was again not even enough for a cab ride home. While the cold war faced its own challenges American within itself had internal conflicts of its own. We had no grounds to distract the world from a major matter over our selfish and unnecessary actions against a man of color. The world should have never known about jimmy Wilson because America should've had the sense to know that the death sentence was not even need at the table when choosing the punishment of a petty robbery. We had no sense of moral when it came to the thoughts and feeling towards the black men and women of America.

The war over communism lied within that homes of some black people and though none chose to speak there was a prominent black intellectual at the time by the name of William Edward Burghardt Du Bois (W.E.B. Du Bois) who was publicly known in his siding with the Soviet Union in the cold war. He wrote in an unpublished manuscript about the soviet's achievements. You might wonder why praise Josef Stalin even at his awareness of the soviet violence. The key to understanding took to his wife Shirley Graham who was procommunist and connect to many communist countries like Egypt, Ghana, China, the Soviet Union, And Europe. WEB viewed the Soviet Union- even looking passed the monstrous acts carried out on their own country- as making considerable progress in creating a society free of racial hierarchy, whereas the United States lagged. The progress reverberated well with African Americans and people of color living in newly independent formerly colonized countries.

Work cited

Dudziak, Mary L. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2011.
"Stanford Scholar Tells History of Cold War from African American Perspective." Stanford News, March 8, 2017. Accessed December 7, 2018. https://news.stanford.edu/2017/03/08/cold-war-african-american-perspective/.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Civil Rights And Its Role In The Cold War For America. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Civil Rights Movement in the USA

One of the most significant elements of the civil right movement is the voting rights act of 1965. This was another act that particularly southern leaders like Martin Luther King, John Lewis (who was beaten pretty badly when marching to Selma) pushing for voting and equality was not included in the Civil Rights Act like equal opportunities in terms of voting, but they do get that pass in 1965 and one of the important clauses in that voting right act was a clause that said for the states, that had a history of disenfranchisement of black voters If they had made any major changes to their laws, to their district then they would have to get federal approval before making those changes. That is the part of the voting right act that has been taken out by the Supreme Court in the last few years and people have been talking about it more and more.

It also gave people from a lower background the opportunity to participate in election as they had been excluded from such opportunities, rights that were granted and the freedom that was achieved. Secondly, I decided to write about these supreme court cases, one of them is called Michelin vs. Oklahoma. This case was against the University of Oklahoma, it is about admitting African Americans to their undergrad programs, but the students weren't allowed to sit in the classrooms. The students had to sit in the hallway which was a drawback to their education. The court completely disagreed with that and said if you are going to admit students into the school, you must allow them to sit in an integrated classroom. That was a good victory.

This sets a precedent for the next step which is the desegregation of public schools and that comes with the court case called the Brown vs. Board of Education. It has to do with a family in Topeka, Kansas. This family lived in a neighborhood which was mostly white. The father was a Reverend, Oliver Brown and their daughter had to go to a segregated all white school. It was not about distance, it was about being able to go to school in her neighborhood with her peers in her own neighborhood.

When the case reached the Supreme Court, the chief justice recognized the case genuine and decided to take the decision with consistency, that everyone, all the judges in the court either should vote in favor around and vote to desegregate public schools or they should all vote against it and say it is totally constitutional. By this point Earl Warren has already voted in favor of other civil right matters and it was very clear that he wanted the decision in-favor of brown and vote towards the desegregation of public school. But he made sure that this be a unanimous decision. A good step in the right direction towards the civil rights and desegregation.

I chose each of these as I thought they were important improvements in the right direction, and they reflect what I believe in and have value in as a Citizen of the United States.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Civil Rights Movement In The USA. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Civil Rights Movement’s Impact on America

During Reconstruction, there was a significant increase of African Americans holding positions very close to white people. They had the right to vote, they held public office, and they sought legislative changes. Jim Crow Laws were a collection of state and local rules that legalized racial segregation, just after all of the progress that was made for African Americans and their rights. Some states that acted like this even went as far as to limit the voting power for blacks.

These laws set a general strict rule that said all African Americans in America were separate but equal. This saying was first set by the Supreme Court in the Plessy vs. Fergurson case, a case where a train passenger by the name of Homer Plessy refused to sit in a train car for blacks. This single incident created the saying separate but equal, leading to the significant restraints that very much affected the speed at which African Americans in our country got their full, true freedom.

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is America's oldest and largest civil rights organization. First established in 1909 by people such as Martin Luther King Jr, W.E.B. Du Bois, Oswald Garrison Villard, and many more, it was formed in New York City by both black and white activists, in response to the spike of violence against African Americans. The organization's first major focus was actually a silent protest that they put together in 1917. Titled the Anti-Lynching Campaign, this early NAACP project protested lynching and other violence against African Americans.

It is said that some 10,000 people participated in this silent protest, naturally making this the organization's main focus for the first few years of its life. The NAACP also had several progressive victories for what they represented. One of their first major victories was that they successfully got the Supreme Court to rule the grandfather clause unconstitutional. This little event was just the beginning of this organization and their constant fight to getting the full freedom they deserve. It is easy to say that without the NAACP; The Civil Rights Movement would not have been so successful in the upcoming years after its formation.

The Civil Rights Act

The Civil Rights Act was passed on July 2nd, 1964. The act created a gateway for all African Americans to a better life by taking away segregation from the country, after decades of always being treated worthlessly by the majority. Without the Civil Rights Act, we most likely would not be where we are today in regards to equality. The act was the result of many events in prior years where African Americans were segregated and treated poorly only for their skin color.

It is incredible that some African Americans were brave enough to stand their ground, because of how long before the Civil Rights Movement began where it was normal to segregate people with darker skin tones. It is events such as The Montgomery Bus Boycott and The Birmingham Church Bombing that really show what it was like to be an African American in this time period. They always had to be mindful of who is in their surroundings and not to go against anyone of more rights. That is, except in the case of Rosa Parks.

Montgomery Bus Boycott

The Montgomery Bus Boycott was one of the most defining moments in the civil rights movement because it showed the power and passion of the African American community. It all started on December 1st, 1955, when a woman by the name of Rosa Parks was taking a bus on her way home from her workplace at a local grocery store. Back in this time, buses were segregated, so the people riding the buses were separated into two sections, black and white. Parks was seated in the front row of the colored section when the white section became filled up with people.

It is common for colored people to stand up when something like this occurs, and since she was seated in the front row of the colored section, Parks was asked to stand up for a white man that needed a seat. She refused to stand up, even when directly instructed by the driver. This occurrence led to the removal of Parks from the bus, along with her arrest. After being bailed out by a local civil rights leader a day later, the entire city population decided to put together a boycott for all city buses. This meant that the entire city population, instead of paying for a bus ride, just walked to their daily destinations, such as work, school, or home.

This went on for a long 381 days, until the Montgomery federal court ruled that any law requiring racially segregated seating on buses directly violated the fourteenth amendment (history.com). The city appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. These improved Montgomery buses were integrated on December 20, 1956. The event of the Montgomery Bus Boycott was one of the first and most powerful instances of The Civil Rights Movement. Without this event, The Civil Rights Movement never would have had such a great starting point and never would have started accelerating and growing as fast as it did. This is why this event and, more importantly, the civil rights movement as a whole, is very important to our country today.

March on Washington

The March on Washington was a very large organized meeting that happened in the Summer of 1963. More than 200,000 Americans came together to peacefully protest The most notable part of the March on Washington was the speech given by Martin Luther King Jr. It was what is now known as the I Have A Dream speech. King stood up in front of the 200,000+ people and gave what is believed to be his greatest speech yet. One of the most notable lines from the speech is as follows: I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character (King, 1963).

This line alone from the speech shows off the main idea that King wants a society in which his children will feel safe to be themselves, rather than hate themselves for who they are. The March on Washington was an event that is still very important to our country today because it shows the unity of over 200,000 people standing up for what they believe in, which is something that our country still has some issues with.

Birmingham Church Bombing

The Birmingham Church Bombing was a terrorist attack done by the Ku Klux Klan on Sunday, September 15th, 1963, in Birmingham, Alabama. The bombing occurred at the 16th Street Baptist Church, a church that many civil rights organizers such as Martin Luther King Jr would meet. The bomb blast killed four little girls and injured fourteen others. The four girls who lost their lives include eleven-year-old Denise McNair and fourteen-year-olds Addie Mae Collins, Carole Robertson, and Cynthia Wesley. The news of the terrorist attack created widespread national outrage. This bombing had been the third bombing in the area in eleven days.

The people of Birmingham were tired of the deadly pattern, so thousands of African American protesters gathered and surrounded the scene of the bombing. This protest quickly got out of control and led to two African American men getting killed, one of them by a cop (history.com). All of this commotion forced Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. to speak up about the matter, creating a sense of control for the people in the area who felt unsafe wherever they turned. The event of the Birmingham Church Bombing was just one of the many, many instances where it was clear that something had to be done about racism and segregation in our country. The Civil Rights Movement used this event to further enhance what could be done to prevent things alike from happening ever again, which makes our world today better for the African American population.

Bloody Sunday

Bloody Sunday was a day in which a peaceful protest turned into a violent danger zone for anyone attending the Selma to Montgomery march. On March 7, 1965, this protest turned disastrous when police officers were attempting to stop the protesters. When the protesters refused to stop, they were beaten and teargassed, leading to many people being put into the hospital. To top it all off, the entire event was televised. This peaceful protest was being broadcasted to the televisions of people from all around the area, but it ended up being a horrific sight of innocent people being beaten and hospitalized. This event was a defining moment for the Civil Rights Movement because it showed another instance where African Americans were punished for doing nothing apart from standing up for what is right: their freedom.

The Life and Assassination of Malcolm X

The assassination of Malcolm X all goes back to when he was 21, when he was sent to prison for theft. While in prison, he met a man named Elijah Muhammad. Muhammed was the leader of the Nation of Islam, a different African American political and religious movement. He ended up becoming a part of the Nation of Islam, becoming an active member and even changing his name to Malcolm X all for the organization. After six years of being imprisoned, Malcolm X was released and became a minister of the Nation of Islam in Harlem, New York. After more years of public speaking and leadership experience, Malcolm X decides to leave the Nation of Islam and creates Muslim Mosque Inc, another Islamic organization.

He also changed his name to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, which is quite the upgrade from Malcolm X. In 1964, El-Hajj founded the Organization of Afro-American Unity. At this point, Malcolm X has a great life of leadership and success. So naturally, his old friend, Elijah Muhammad, was getting jealous of him. Muhammed thought that he had become too powerful. This led to the worst conclusion imaginable. On February 21, 1965, Malcolm X was shot to his death by members of the Nation of Islam while he was speaking at a rally for the Organization of Afro-American Unity, in New York City. Malcolm X's assassination was a defining moment in the Civil Rights Movement because he was a strong leader respected by many and was very suddenly brought to a halt, ultimately putting things into perspective for those against his cause.

The Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

On the morning of April 4th, 1968, Reverend Martin Luther King Jr was shot in the neck while standing on the balcony of a motel he was staying in at the time, the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee. He was in the area along with other Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) members to lead a march of sanitation workers that were on strike. King was rushed to a nearby hospital and died about an hour later. He was constantly speaking out to the people, helping anyone that possibly needed it. He was an activist. He had speeches and marches planned for every day he could possibly take, that is how dedicated he was. The last thing everyone expected on that evening was to receive the news of the death of such a respected leader.

When news got out about the activist's assassination, over 100 surrounding cities started to riot, which ultimately caused a lot more chaos in the situation. After a two-month search for the assassin, a man by the name of James Earl Ray was sentenced to 99 years in prison for the murder of civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. There is actually a lot of controversy and conspiracy surrounding the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. James Earl Jones came out and said that he was not the assassin. This obviously does not give him a free pass home. There was some pretty sufficient evidence against James Earl Ray: Witnesses had seen him running from a boarding house near the Lorraine Motel carrying a bundle; prosecutors said he fired the fatal bullet from a bathroom in that building (history.com, 2010). Despite this surefire evidence, many people, including direct family of King, believe that Jones was a victim of conspiracy (britannica.com). The overall impact of the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. was quite the eye-opener for the people of our country.

King seemed like an unstoppable force, going where he wished and always succeeding in improving the world around him. But the moment they hear about his life being ended with a single bullet for no good reason, it makes people start to really think about the state of America. The Civil Rights Movement reached a new level when King was assassinated. This new level brought up new successes and led to more improvements that still impact our world today.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Civil Rights Movement continues to be relevant in our country today because it has gradually led us to a freer and better country. The Montgomery Bus Boycott helped us first start seeing the amount of people that felt the same way about segregation: just enough to purposefully not ride a bus to their daily activities for well over a year. The March on Washington gave the people a glimpse of the thoughts of Civil Rights activist Martin Luther King Jr with his I Have A Dream speech. Bloody Sunday was a terrible event that led to the injury of many of our own citizens.

From that, we learned to not make the same mistake again when it comes to protesting and boundaries. The assassination of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr showed everyone from this time era that even the most successful of African Americans are unsafe from the dangers that string from racism. It's for these reasons that the civil rights movement continues to have had a huge impact on our country.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Civil Rights Movement's Impact on America. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Malcolm X and the Civil Rights War

There are some who may argue that immediately after the end of the American Civil War and abolition of slavery, America entered in a new era of modern black slavery. One that did not see the blacks physically restrained in chains, but entangled in an era of segregation, physical and verbal attacks, lynching, and silver tongued political promises of equality. The African American Civil Rights movement has had a long and tumultuous history. However today only the Civil Right movements of the 1950's and 60's are recognized for positive gains which marked history for black citizens. Many Civil Right leaders and activists such as Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. DuBois, Walter Francis White, and Ella Baker put an immense amount of work into improving the lives of the African Americans in post Civil War America, yet they take a back seat to figures like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who is recognized as the public face of the Civil Rights movement.

In the late 1950's a shift began . For many years the Civil Right leaders and activists sought to work within black communities and with national politicians to pass laws to ensure that the American blacks were given the same opportunities as the white man. This approach, sometimes called the top down approach, promoted the idea that through legislature and federal enforcement the American Negro could eventually achieve the same rights as his white neighbors. However, for every law passed to ensure equality including the Civil Rights Act of 1957, Voting Rights Act, and Brown vs. Board of Education, there was opposition from white citizens.

Segregation and racial oppression began to rise, especially in the south. Anywhere the Civil Rights movement began to gain momentum so did crimes against blacks with majority of those crimes never investigated or prosecuted. Law makers, specially southern Democrats worked actively to make passing any bills to support the Civil Rights Movement difficult. In April 1918, Leonidas Dyer introduced H.R. 11279, an anti-lynching bill based on a draft by Albert E. Pillsbury that called for prosecution of any lynchers and included monetary restitution for the family of the victim from the county in which the crime occured in. The house bill was filibustered by southern Democrats and defeated in the south. As Civil Right leaders pushed for more federal aid, they ignored the white view of the negro social movements. Whites believed negro leadership demanded the white man's house, the white man's job, and a seats for their children in the white man's schools. The white man did not want integration, he wanted segregation. Effectively the Civil Rights era can be summed up as black progress vs. white backlash.

The Civil Rights movement was pushing for government assistance and social changes that improved the lives of black Americans. However, these changes would enslave blacks to the Federal government effectively creating a welfare state. In a report titled The Negro Problem: The Case for National Action; also called the Moynihan Report written by The Assistant Secretary of Labor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Moynihan argued that there laid a foundation of destructive ghetto culture in the black community that gave rise to the black-single-mother-families which widened the gap between the negro and other American societies. He argued that while blacks were working to achieve civil liberties by encouraging a top down approach in order to help citizens at the bottom, they were not taking care of their own social needs nor were they working toward self improvement measures that would give them better a economic future. According to Moynihan's report, between 1954 and 1964 more blacks were out of work resulting in higher rates of poverty and lower education which gave rise to crime that affected the black community in a negative way. After publishing of this report, the NAACP condemned and dismissed the report as nothing but racial profiling based on inaccurate information.

What Civil Rights activists and leaders ignored was that in order for the socio-economic status of Blacks to improve, they must first change the social behavior in their own community, effectively improving the black social status from the ground up, not the other way around. The top down approach utilized by the Civil Rights movement would increase the dependency of the black community to the federal government and not lessen it. The need for self reliance was overlooked in lieu of gaining social equality by working with the very people that did not see the black person as equal to himself in the first place.

The inner social problems gripping the black community were not ignored or dismissed by everyone. Malcolm X's ideology and teaching centered around the idea that social improvements were the only solution that would result in black prosperity. Born Malcolm Little, he suffered multiple family tragedies beginning at a very young age. When he was six years old, his father who was a former supporter of the early black nationalist leader Marcus Garvey, was murdered by members of The Black Legion; a white paramilitary force. Years later his mother became institutionalized after she suffered a major nervous breakdown promoting welfare officials to split and place Malcolm and his siblings into different foster homes. While in junior high, Malcolm dropped out of school because he learned that despite his aptitude for learning, he would not be able to achieve his dreams. One day in classroom he was asked by his english teacher if he thought about what career he wanted to pursue. Malcolm responded by saying that he would like to be a lawyer.

Surprised by the response, his teacher sat Malcolm down and told him Malcolm, one of life's first needs is for us to be realistic. You've got to be realistic about being a nigger, a lawyer- that's no realistic goal for a nigger. Disheartened, Malcolm decided to drop out of school and started to work and move around the country. Slowly he was initiated into a life of crime and after moving to Boston to live with his half sister, he turned his efforts, anger, and focus in becoming a full-time criminal. He became a drug pusher, pimp and gang leader a perfect example of what the Moynihan Report suggested was happening in the black community. At age 19 he was arrested and convicted of burglary at a series of Boston-area homes. He was sentenced to state prison for six years. While in prison, Malcolm decided to change his life and began to use the prison's library to educate himself. He learned all he could about slavery and the past, becoming disgusted and horrified by what he learned. Following the example of family members, Malcolm converted from Christianity and joined the Nation of Islam.

He began to correspond with its leader, Elijah Muhammad. The Nation of Islam preached black self-reliance and empowerment and that striked and accord with Malcolm. He began to view the current black situation as nothing but the effects of post civil war modern slavery. He dropped his last name, Little, and instead adopted the letter X which stood for unknown. He believed that all blacks living in America had been given their last names by the slave masters and that not one negro living in America knew his or her true name, only his or her slave name. He also viewed the problems facing the blacks in America as a human problem and not solely a Civil Rights problem.

Malcolm X could not support the strategy of the Civil Rights movement because he identified a paradox in the non-violent Civil Rights movement of Dr. King. Malcolm believed that the Civil Rights movement leaders accepted the status quo. They encouraged no retaliation in face of police brutality, intimidation, murder, and harassment as these events where everyday norm for the black man and woman living in America. He framed his view by stating: any time a shepard, a pastor, teaches you and me not to run from the white man, and at the same time teaches us not to fight the white man, he's a traitor to you and me. He labeled the Civil Rights leaders, especially Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., as nothing but the modern Uncle Tom. Placating their white master while modern slaves were beaten by the police, kept down and forced to live in segregation.

It was during this time that Malcolm X also began to diverge away from the teachings of Elijah Muhammad. He began to realize that Elijah Muhammad had served the status quo more than Dr. King, by keeping Muslims praying in their house of worship and out of voting booth and Civil Rights activity. He urged his black Muslim brothers to no longer let status quo lead their actions. He urged them to get up, fight and take the fight to the agitators. As a black nationalist he believed and encouraged the black Americans to fight racial oppression, segregation and discrimination by any means necessary.

Malcolm X believed that seperation was the only mean to true freedom and prosperity for the African American people and that there was a clear distinction between separation and segregation. During his speech at Michigan State University, he stated that segregation is forced upon inferiors by superiors and a segregated community is a negro community. Malcolm pointed out that even though negroes lived in separate communities, they in fact lived in a segregated community. They lived under white law, white economy, and white politics. Malcolm believed that the only solution was to rise from the bottom and push the through the top. He argued that the philosophy of black nationalism involves a re-education program in the black community in regards to economics and commerce, politics, and law, especially regarding human rights law. There are many who attribute the teachings of both Malcolm X and Dr. King to the Civil Right activity branch of W.E.B DuBois.

Through my research, I now believe that Malcolm's views on how to address the inner social issues plaguing the black population is more aligned with Booker T. Washington's ideals that a bottom up approach than with DuBois' top down approach. Just like Booker T., Malcolm valued education very highly and believed that economic prosperity could only be achieved for the black man, by the black man, within the black man's community. That prosperity would give the black man power to sit equally at the negotiating table without dependance on the very people that caused him harm in the first place.

Over and over he argued that negros could never have civil rights in America until their human rights were first restored, and argued that we will never be recognized as citizens until we are first recognized as humans. Separation was the road to salvation and for that dream to come true, the black community had to control its economy, politics, laws and enforcement, and overall its own everything. Many who study Malcolm X and his work as a social activist often overlook the fact that he viewed the problems facing the 22 million blacks living in America not as a race problem, but as a human problem. In many of his speeches he argued that the human rights struggle was greater than the civil rights struggle. He believed that the civil rights fight kept black problems under the jurisdiction of the very people enforcing the problem. In a speech sharing his views, Malcolm stated, Civil Rights means you're asking Uncle Sam to treat you right. Human rights are something you were born with, and they are your God given right. To Malcolm the struggles that blacks faced in America was a war.

A war against the unjust, a war against the oppressor, a war against hypocrisy and human cruelty. During the Ballot or the Bullet speech Malcolm said that he believed when black men take their case to Washington, they are in fact talking to the very criminals responsible for the crime against them in first place. To take your case into any court, to any politician, to anyone representing the very system that is crushing the soul of the black man, would not result in anything better than promises that would be riddled with so many loopholes that the end result would further bind the hands of the black man. Malcolm wanted to take Uncle Sam to court. He wanted to bring the case of the African American struggle before United Nation and the World Court just like atrocities that had been committed in Latin America, Asia, and Africa were previously brought to the World Court. He argued that on the only level that one could do so would fall under the category of human right, because Civil Rights simply means you're asking the aggressor to treat you right. Later on during his pilgrimage and travel around the world, Malcolm X learned how the world saw America. Traveling throughout the Muslim world Malcolm was confronted over and over with questions about America's racial discrimination. In his autobiography Malcolm wrote that he was astonished at the degree to which the major single image of America seemed to be discrimination.

Malcolm X was one of the only Civil Right era social activist that understood the problem facing his people. He waged a war against hypocrisy and status quo by empowering his followers to stand up, become responsible for their own prosperity, fight back and never back down. He encouraged followers to defend themselves against the racial bullies and take the fight to them. Throughout history Malcolm X has been labeled and even credited as the leader of the black militant movement. His fiery speeches and belief in absolute separation and retaliation will forever mark him as an agitator. I shared this view before studying Malcolm X's life and teachings. Malcolm's violent past shaped who he became. Angry at the unfair world, angry at what he and other African Americans believed was years of broken promises, fed up with the treatment he and other blacks received every single day, and angry with the black leaders who drank tea with the very people who brought so much misery upon them.

However, Malcolm was also a man of principle and great pride. Elijah Muhammad, his teacher and mentor had affairs with seven of his teenage secretaries and fathered eight children with the young women. When Malcolm learned this, he confronted Muhammad requiring him to reveal the truth to his congregation. When faced with any truth, Malcolm adapted, accepted, and acted accordingly. Some think that this was a flaw in Malcolm X's character and labeled him a flip flopper, however he acted according to his morals and what the truth laid before him. Malcolm's religion was at the heart of his beliefs and teachings. He believed that for the Blacks in America to prosper, separation and full acceptance of Islam was a must. This belief however was changed when Malcolm went on his pilgrimage to Mecca and visited with the Muslim leaders in Middle East and North Africa.

In a letter to Dr. Shawarbi, Malcolm expressed his wonderment and awe at how all people from all corners of the world seem to be treated as one under Islamic Law. He wrote, There were tens of thousands of pilgrims, from all over he world. They were of all colors, from blue-eyed blondes to black-skinned Africans, but we were all participating in the same ritual displaying a spirit of unity and brotherhood that my experiences in America had led me to believe never could exist between the white and the non-white. Malcolm further expressed in his letter to Dr. Shawarbi that America needs to understand Islam, because this is the one religion that erases from its society the race problem. As he met with many open-minded muslim leaders he began to change his conviction.

Malcolm began to believe that unification of blacks in America was possible under the Islamic flag. Malcolm believed that the Negro leaders in America must travel to all the non-white lands and meet with educated men and world leaders so that he could return home with more effective thinking and solutions to America's racial problem. The world saw the Negro in America as confused and divided believing that if he doesn't himself know what his cause is how can he achieve what he desires? In Malcolm's view, the Civil Rights War could only be won by empowering the 22 million blacks through political, economical, and social education. To be self-reliant would remove the dependency on white man and his law.

Before his death, Malcolm began to spread his belief that not only blacks, but all Americans should be indoctrinated with Islam and learn from its lessons so that all could live under one nation, effectively eliminating the need for separation.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Malcolm X and the Civil Rights War. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Civil Right Movement the Rise for Social Justice

Racial injustice has marked the United States' history by being the most captivating issue that persists even until today for African Americans. One of America's greatest speakers, Martin Luther King Jr. , became the leading voice for this group, enforcing a societal change by making public speeches and peacefully protests. As a result, and in response to the white clergymen's published criticism of his actions, Dr. King writes the Letter from Birmingham Jail to show them the negative effects segregation has on the African American group in order to encourage a societal change. Thus, in his letter, Dr. King emotionally persuades religious leaders and the white moderates by employing various examples of allusion, imagery, and rhetorical questions, which stem out from ethos, pathos, and logos to, ultimately, correct the audience's mentality on segregation and to defend the nonviolent actions he takes in order to stand up against racial injustice.

In order to argue effectively about racial segregation, King relies on allusions and ethos not only to present himself knowledgeable and educated but also to appeal to different groups of people such as, but not limited to, the Christians, Jews, and activists. In other words, King writes to the clergymen but also attempts to speak to other groups of people to by attempting to relate to them. Furthermore, King uses biblical allusions to explain what he believes his role as a man of God is in the world and states, ...just as the Apostle Paul left his village of Tarsus and carried the gospel of Jesus Christ to the far corners of the Greco-Roman world, so am I compelled to carry the gospel of freedom beyond my own home. Like Paul, I must constantly respond to the macedonian call for aid (King 1). Furthermore, King references Paul in order to demonstrate that just like Paul left everything behind to carry the gospel of Jesus Christ to a location where God was unspoken of and fulfill his mission, King states that he too is willing to leave everything behind in order to speak of freedom spreading from Birmingham.

Furthermore, King believes he should respond to the call for aid by preaching about nonviolence actions to conclude the era of racial discrimination. By referring to the biblical texts, King cannot only connect with the clergymen and the religious majority but he also lead them to recognize their identity as Christians. Not only did Dr. King intend to talk to Christians, but also the Jewish majority by stating, To use the words of Martin Buber, the great Jewish philosopher, segregation substitutes an "I-it" relationship for the "I-thou" relationship, and ends up relegating persons to the status of things (King 3). King relates to the Jewish community by referencing to the respected philosopher, Martin Buber, who understood segregation very well due to being treated as a subordinate himself.

However, King also intends to speak to the activists by presenting the philosopher, Socrates, and explaining ...just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths to the unfettered realm of creative analysis and objective appraisal (King 2). In other words, Dr. King states that if Socrates was of good character and was correct in creating tension so individuals' minds could grow, then tension is good in order for the people to become stronger individuals such as the African Americans. Thus, Dr. King establishes a connection with not only the clergymen but a broader audience by alluding to important figures in order to reason his presence in Birmingham and possibly lead the public to change their stance on racial injustice.

Branching out from the appeal of ethos and allusion, Dr. King uses imagery as well as pathos to affect the audiences' emotions with the intentions to spark the public audience's desire to take action and end racism and inequality with African Americans. Thus, King illustrates the negative effects segregation has on African Americans by stating, ...vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim...when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse, kick, brutalize, and even kill your black brothers and sisters (King 2). By depicting a violent scene, King successfully explains to the audience the daily struggles and obstacles individuals of color go through by calling for empathy, compassion, and, perhaps, guilt since these violent scenes took place in public areas, such as the streets where everyone could observe, and refrained from helping.

In other words, Dr. King's audience cannot argue otherwise with his statements that such things have happened. Not only does King intend to present the physical damage segregation has had on African Americans, but also states the emotional damage when he explains, You suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six-year-old daughter why she can't go to the public amusement park that has just been advertised on television, and see tears welling up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is close to colored children, (King 2).

In other words, although it is not physical abuse, having separate parks is also a form of emotional abuse. Thus, by presenting this specific situation between an African American parent and child, Dr. King explains his frustration as a parent having to take away his daughter's innocence by having to open up her eyes to demonstrate how colored individuals are treated in the world. In other words, those who are parents themselves can locate themselves into the situation. In addition, King also states, ...when you see the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers something in an airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society (King 2). King further demonstrates the hate society has towards African Americans and rejects it by calling it an airtight cage giving the reader a sense of a suffocating area.

Thus, the image of a tight and closed area, trapped with other people and not being able to liberate oneself to join the those who are free, accurately explains to the audience the daily struggles of an African American individual. Overall, by using imagery and pathos, King gives an opportunity to the clergymen and the public audience to reconsider their stance in the society and justifies his nonviolent actions towards racial injustice with explanations illustrating images which evoke sympathy.

Martin Luther King Jr.continues to further persuade the audience by employing rhetorical questions as well as logos, to give logically justify his peaceful actions against racial injustice. Thus, King further explains his thoughts by presenting a question his audience could potentially have saying, You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit ins, marches and so forth? Isn't negotiating a better path?" (King 2). In other words, by presenting a question his audience could potentially have, King allows his audience to gain an understanding on the logic behind the peaceful protests. Once the audience gains an understanding King further explains why such actions should be taken by stating, One may well ask: "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. (King 3). In other words, while segregation was a just law for some individuals, African Americans saw them as unjust due to the unequal treatments they often obtained from others.

Thus, King encourages African Americans to protest and stand up for what is right. King further argues that an African American individual should not be blamed for evil acts due to the fact that they are the victims and further implies this questioning, Isn't this like condemning Jesus because his unique God-consciousness and never-ceasing devotion to God's will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion? (King 3). Thus, with the use of rhetorical question and logical explanations, he is able to effectively justify peaceful protests that were taking place as a result of segregation.

In conclusion, although Martin Luther King Jr. wrote the Letter from Birmingham Jail in response to the clergymen's criticism towards his actions against racial injustice, as he uses allusions, imagery, and rhetorical questions makes it clear that he intended for the public to also read what he had to say. Thus, with the use of allusion and ethos, imagery and pathos, and rhetorical questions and logos, Dr. King efficiently persuades the audience's mentality on taken against racial injustice.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Civil Right Movement The Rise for Social Justice. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Martin Luther King Jr. once said, Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself. Truer words could not be used to describe the people who suffered discrimination and racism because of the ignorance of American people. The act was originally drawn up in 1962 under President Kennedy before his assassination; it survived the rampage of strong Southern opposition in Congress and was signed by successor Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed guaranteeing the end of segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination on the basis of race, colour, religion, sex, or national origin.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was one of the most controversial and most argued debates passed by the House and Senate debates in history. It was also the biggest piece of civil rights legislation ever passed. The bill actually evolved from previous civil rights bills in the late 1950's and early 1960's. Before the Civil Rights Act, people abode by Jim Crow laws and condoned the Ku Klux Klan. White southerners were not happy with the end of slavery and the idea of living or working equally with blacks whom they considered inferior. To keep-up, the majority of states and local communities passed Jim Crow laws that required separate but equal status for African Americans.

These laws established laws against the opposite race. Jim Crow Laws were established between 1874 and 1975. Jim Crow laws enforced racial segregation and acted upon the saying "separate but equal". Colored and white people had different facilities where the colored one would be mediocre at best. Some constitutional amendments had already been passed abolishing slavery, made slaves citizens, and have all men the right to vote. In the South however, African americans were constantly threatened and were afraid of voting and jeopardizing their safety; even if colored people were allowed to vote, they had to pass a literacy test none of the white men had to take and even then were threatened by people with authority.

John F. Kennedy was elected to president on January 1961. He was pushed into taking action against the South's police brutality. In Birmingham, Alabama, authorities controlled nonviolent demonstrations with dogs, clubs, and high-pressure hoses. Although concerned about losing Southern support for reelection, he began working on a bill to end segregation. Opposed by Congress, the bill was never supported enough to pass and the KKK didn't help either. He was assassinated November 22, 1963 in Dallas while in a motorcade. Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson stepped up to President and continued Kennedy's work, Let this session of congress be known as the session which did more for civil rights than the last hundred sessions combined., said Johnson in his first state of the Union address. The House of Representatives debated for nine days, rejecting nearly 100 amendments designed to weaken the bill. At the senate, some final challenges presented themselves. The bill's expansion of federal powers and its potential to anger constituents who might retaliate in the voting booth were feared.

The bill passed the house on February 10, 1964 after 70 days of public hearings, appearances by 275 witnesses, and 5,792 pages of published testimony says the Constitutional Rights Foundation says The Civil Rights Act of 1964 published by A&E Television Networks. The senate voted 73-27 in favor of the bill and Johnson signed it into law on July 2, 1964 banning segregation in all public places including courthouses, parks, restaurants, theaters, sports arenas, and hotels; a person could not be denied because of the color of their skin. Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with at least 75 pens which he handed out to congressional supporters of the bill such as Hubert Humphrey, the 38th Vice President of the United States, former United States Senator Everett Dirksen who nurtured the bill through compromised discussions, and to civil rights leaders like the well-known Martin Luther King Jr. who said it was nothing less than a second emancipation.

Once the bill was approved and signed, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commision opened; they could and would file lawsuits on behalf of workers making the workplace more equal and forced bosses or recruiters to not discriminate against the workers knowing if they did they would be sued says the National Archive: Educator Resources. Not only were discriminatory people being sued, but federal funds could no longer be used for any racial programs whose sole mission was to discriminate against colored people. The Office of Education was also given funds to help desegregate schools and prohibited the unequal application of voting requirements.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 paved the way for the Voting Rights Act of 1965 which prohibited literacy tests and other discriminatory voting practices set in place to stop colored people from voting and violated their 15th amendment rights: the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. says the Library of Congress. Also, thanks to both of these acts, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 was passed banning discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of property.

Thanks to the bill, voter registration of the eligible black population increased from under seven percent in 1965 to more than 70 percent in 1967 in Mississippi. In 1990, 66.2% of all African Americans 25 years or older had completed high school, while in 1997 the percentage increased to 74.9%. They began getting an opportunity to study, go to school, and get a better job. People who had been racially discriminated against were going onto higher education; in 1996, only 1,563 doctorates were awarded and had a 48% increase since 1987.

People back then needed dentists just like now. Women were starting to expand from staying at home and doing domestic jobs. They could go to school now and turned to dentistry. Women earned only one percent of professional dental degrees in 1972 and increased to 36% in 1996. This means both colored men and women started getting jobs and joining men after they could no longer be discriminated because of the color of their skin and their sex. Not only were people working to graduate from college, but also pursuing higher education including doctorates. In 1971, only 14% of women achieving doctoral degrees and increased to 40% in 1996.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 led to growing equality in women's rights, disability rights, gay rights, and immigrant rights. It was a new era, a new chapter in the book, as discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin was outlawed. It paved the way for desegregation and the prohibition of discrimination in public places and within agencies. It improved the black and colored community. They could now go anywhere they wanted to without fearing racism or being turned away because of the color of their skin. Colored people could use the same bathrooms as whites and didn't have social barriers when it came to socializing and even finding jobs.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Civil Rights Act of 1964. (2019, Mar 21). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Principles of Behavioral Therapy

Behavioral therapies are based on the theory of classical conditioning. The principle of behavioral therapy is all behavior is learned. Faulty learning (i.e. conditioning) is the cause of anomalous behavior. The aim of the behavioral therapy is to focus on current behavioral issues and on efforts to remove the undesirable behaviors. Behavioral therapy has clear distinctions from psychodynamic therapy (re: Freud) who emphasizes on uncovering unresolved conflicts from childhood (i.e. the cause of abnormal behavior). Skinner and A. Bandura are well known behavioral theorists Skinner developed a theory of operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. Through operant conditioning, an individual makes an association between a particular behavior and a consequence (Skinner, 1938). The main principle of operant conditioning is changing environmental events that are related to a person's behavior.

For example, the reinforcement of desired behaviors and ignoring or punishing undesired ones. Unlike Skinner, Bandura believed that humans are active information processors and think about the relationship between their behavior and its consequences. Observational learning could not occur unless cognitive processes were at work. These mental factors mediate in the learning process to determine whether a new response is acquired. Therefore, individuals do not automatically observe the behavior of a model and imitate it. There is some thought prior to imitation, and this consideration is called mediational processes. This occurs between observing the behavior (stimulus) and imitating it or not (response) (Bandura, 1977)

Examples of behavior therapy include: Systematic Desensitization, Aversion Therapy and Flooding. The theory of classical conditioning suggests a response is learned and repeated through immediate association. Behavioral therapies based on classical conditioning aim to break the association between stimulus and undesired response (e.g. phobia, additional etc.) Systematic desensitization Systematic desensitization was developed by South African psychologist Joseph Wolpe. In the 1950s. Wolpe discovered that the cats of Wits University could overcome their fears through gradual and systematic exposure.

The therapy is based on the principles of classical conditioning. The goals of systematic desensitization are to remove the fear response of a phobia and substitute a relaxation response to the conditional stimulus gradually using counter conditioning. (Wolpe, 1958) Treatment contains 3 phases: Phase 1 Learning a deep muscle relaxation technique and breathing exercises (control over breathing, muscle de tensioning or meditation). This step is very important because of reciprocal inhibition, where once response is inhibited because it is incompatible with another. For example in phobias, fears involves tension and tension is incompatible with relaxation. Phase 2 Forming a fear ladder starting at stimuli that create the least anxiety (fear) and building up in stages to the most fear-provoking images. The list is vital for building a therapy structure.

For example, define the ultimate level-10 scary Phase 3 Working the way up the fear ladder starting at the least unpleasant stimuli with relaxation techniques. Once comfortable and no longer afraid with the step 1 of the fear ladder, gradually move on to the step 2. If the client becomes upset, they can return to an earlier stage and regain their relaxed state. The client repeatedly imagines (or is confronted by) this situation until it fails to evoke any anxiety at all, indicating that the therapy has been successful. This process is repeated while working through all of the situations in the anxiety ladder until the most anxiety-provoking. Exposure can be done in two ways:

  1. In vitro “ the client imagines exposure to the phobic stimulus.
  2. In vivo “ the client is actually exposed to the phobic stimulus. Research has found that in vivo techniques are more successful than in vitro (Menzies & Clarke, 1993).

Whether the fear is of elevators or public speaking, the basic principles of systematic desensitization are the same: 1. Define the ultimate level-10 scary 2. Define level-1 scary 3. Brainstorm and rank all points in between. 4. Assign the level-1 scariest as homework. 5. In a week, review the homework and assign level 2. Depending on the severity of the phobia, number of sessions can vary from 4 to 12. Once therapeutic goals are met (not necessarily when the person's fears have been completely removed), the therapy is considered to be successful. Practical Issues In vitro exposition depends on patient's ability to to imagine the fearful object or situation. Some people cannot create a vivid image and thus systematic desensitization is not always effective Systematic desensitization is highly effective where the problem is a learned anxiety of specific objects/situations, e.g. phobias. It is not effective in treating serious mental disorders like depression and schizophrenia.

Systematic desensitization treats only the observable and measurable symptoms of phobia, not symptoms not the causes of the phobia. It's a substantial weakness because cognitions and emotions are often the motivators of behavior and so the treatment is only dealing with symptoms not the underlying causes. Systematic desensitization may not work on social phobias and agoraphobia due to the fact that it's usually originates from other psychological/biological issues vs learned behavior. (Lang, et.al., 1963) Flooding (Total Immersion) Flooding in its purest form involves forced, prolonged exposure to the actual stimulus that provoked the original trauma. (Wolpe, 1969) The idea of treatment phobia by exposure in feared situation was originally proposed by Freud in 1919.

In the mid-1960s, Thomas Stampfl, pioneered a technique called 'implosion therapy' to treat phobias, currently known as flooding. He discovered that after six to nine hours of detailed description of fearful situations, patients with phobia would most likely lose their fear. Stampfl's research was later refined by Zev Wanderer, who used biofeedback machines to monitor patients listening to verbal descriptions of what they most feared. Using phrases that provoked the most intense phobic reactions, he was able to reduce session time to about two hours for the first session and half an hour of exposure during the second session. Tape recording of the sessions were used for daily homework. Systematic research on flooding under its current name pioneered in the late 1960's by Wolpe.

According to Wolpe, flooding may in fact be the most rapid and effective of all available methods for treating phobias. (Wolpe, 1969) Skinner and Bandura are well known theorists . Skinner believes that behavior is Flooding works by exposing the patient directly to the phobic object or situation for an extended period of time in a safe and controlled environment. Unlike systematic desensitization which might use in vitro or virtual exposure, flooding generally involves in vivo exposure. The theory is based on the fact that fear is the time limited response, therefore, the patient may experience panic and extreme anxiety at first, but ultimately anxiety decreases due to exhaustion and patient has no choice but confront their fears. Subsequently, the fear which is anticipatory in the most cases is extinguished.

Prolonged intense exposure eventually creates a new association between the feared object and something positive like a sense of calm and lack of anxiety. It also prevents reinforcement of phobia through escape or avoidance behaviors. ( Wolpe, 1969) Considering the fact that not all the patients are able to tolerate high levels of anxiety flooding can lead to re-traumatization and reinforcement of fear avoidance response. There is a narrow therapeutic window between facing fears and reaching anxiety limits. Flooding is not an appropriate treatment for every phobia. Wolpe (1960) reported the case of a client whose anxiety intensified to such as degree that flooding therapy resulted hospitalization. Its successfully used for aquaphobia, claustrophobia, PTSD and agoraphobia. The success of the method confirms the hypothesis that phobias are so persistent because the object is avoided in real life and is therefore not extinguished by the discovery that it is harmless. (McLeod, 2010)

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Principles of Behavioral Therapy. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gun Violence in American Culture

Guns, guns, and more guns are becoming an integral part of American culture. The problem is that guns are providing far too many Americans with the courage to be insane or even misuse them. Guns have their pros and cons. Guns can be used to protect citizens in their everyday life or those same guns can be used to harm those citizens. Despite having gun law, we still face common tragedies to this day such as mass shootings, school shootings and even suicide. So, what can really change to prevent such things from happening or can the common problem be changed at all?

According to the United States law the laws regulate the manufacture, trade, possession, transfer, record keeping, transport, and destruction of firearms, ammunition, and firearms accessories. We should allow the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to track gun sales, and keep the data it collects electronically and searchable. This data would be a slight decrease in violence if we knew more about the firearm that's been sold or even the area of location. Most individuals still manage to get possession on firearms and ammunition but is that enough. We need to empower a permanent commission, possibly under the Department of Homeland Security, to bring all the data together, in consultation with law enforcement, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education and any other relevant parties, to make ongoing policy and regulatory recommendations to reduce gun violence.

Firearm sales and individual verification records are basic devices law implementation can use to understand wrongdoings including firearms and recognize degenerate weapon merchants and buyers. While government law requires authorized firearm merchants to keep up deals records, it likewise requires the FBI to annihilate affirmed historical verification records, hampering law authorization endeavors. States can and should find a way to fill the holes in government law. Firearm sales and personal investigation records can be utilized by law authorization in various approaches to explain weapon wrongdoings and recognize firearm merchants and buyers who are disregarding state and government firearm laws. For instance, deals records can empower officers to distinguish the last retail buyer of a gun that has been utilized in a wrongdoing, which can prompt the ID and indictment of fierce offenders.

Federal law requires authorized guns merchants to keep up records of weapon deals inconclusively, including data about the firearms being acquired, and the purchaser. Federal law disallows the government from gathering gun deals records in a focal storehouse, in any case. Without a focal archive of all gun deals records, weapon following is a moderate, unwieldy process. Unified records of weapon possession would significantly expand the proficiency of the following procedure. These records would likewise help law requirement recover guns from people who have turned out to be lawfully denied from having them, and they could be utilized to alarm law implementation to the nearness of weapons at a private living arrangement when they are reacting to a crisis call.

All together for law authorization to have finish data about weapon possession, notwithstanding, Congress would need to bring the private deal to a loophole, which enables weapons to be sold by people who are not authorized guns merchants.

Governmentally authorized gun merchants are required to utilize the National Criminal Instant Background Check System (NICS) to direct individual verifications on forthcoming guns buyers to guarantee that the gun exchange would not abuse administrative or state law. For instance, merchants may endeavor to conceal deals to individuals who might fail a background check by putting the name of somebody with a spotless record on the background check application. Another manner by which law requirement could utilize individual verification records is to reveal weapon trafficking rings. To recognize weapon traffickers, government law expects merchants to report offers of more than two guns in a five-day time frame to ATF. People can just avoid this prerequisite by purchasing firearms from various merchants. Without an incorporated archive of records, merchants have no chance to get of realizing that purchasers are visiting various merchants.

When getting a firearm if you are a felon with a sentence exceeding 2 years or a misdemeanor, past or present and those who are involuntarily admitted in a mental institution are disqualified for getting a firearm. I feel as is if you have a felony or a misdemeanor period you should not qualify for a firearm. If we have anyone trying to get a license I feel we can eliminate a lot of problems by having these individuals obtaining a psych evaluation to determine whether you are suitable or not to have a firearm. If you a felony, why cannot more investigation be done to these individuals or safer use on firearms.

We live in a society that involves incredible decent variety of practices and philosophies. We are likewise a society that tries to oblige however many of these practices and belief systems as could be allowed. Be that as it may, as a society, do we not have the privilege to guarantee the wellbeing of our citizens? Do we not have the obligation to ensure our kids as they play and learn in their schools? Do we not have the privilege to appreciate a motion picture without dread of being executed or injured? Is the second amendment more prominent in degree and significance than the other constitutional amendments? Given the present condition, clearly it is. Should we keep on giving more noteworthy assurance to weapon proprietors to the detriment of the rest of society, we can rely on more mass killings and suffering. I trust that we should never again endure seeing individuals grieve the loss of family and companions essentially claiming others have a need to arm themselves with weapons that are intended to murder.

Mass homicides are not dedicated by rational individuals. Just a little portion of rationally sick individuals at any point end up brutal, and afterward, ordinarily, when they neglect to get treatment. People with a serious dysfunctional behavior ought not be permitted to buy weapons or approach them. Join firearms and untreated psychological instability, you have a disaster holding up to occur. When your child turns 18, he or she has a common ideal to reject treatment and remain rationally sick until or except if she or he ends up self-destructive or desperate, as controlled by judges at responsibility hearings. State laws shift, yet all states set strict controls with respect to automatic hospitalization and constrained treatment, restricting it to conditions when a man is an inescapable risk to self or others, or prone to end up so. These laws give adults with psychological sickness the privilege to choose when, where, how and regardless of whether they will get treatment. However, some genuine psychological instabilities make it troublesome for those influenced to evaluate their own requirement for treatment. At the point when persistent rights surpass important securities, people with extreme psychological sickness can pass on. What's more, many do. Also, occasionally, they hurt others along the way. It is hard to evaluate the likelihood of a person to submit a rough demonstration that hurts anybody including himself/herself. In this manner, firearm laws require be observed intently and made more steady all through each state to avoid savagery that could avert mass shootings.

Mass shootings in the United States have been lamentably turned into an irritating pattern that seems to be on the rise. There have been shootings out in the open spots accepting media inclusion and giving the recognition they are turning into the new typical. Schools, malls, movie theaters and even churches, are just a few of territories that have seen weapon savagery from a mass shooter. There are such many things to ask it is difficult to figure out where to begin, yet numerous simply need the viciousness to stop. Mass shootings generally are just the same old thing new, aside from they appear to happen more regularly in present day society. You can return in history and find out about mass shootings that have occurred before the turn of the century. The possibility of honest individuals being shot and executed for reasons unknown is sufficient for individuals to need to make a move. The issue here is that it appears there are insufficient individuals willing to stand firm against it. There are laws set up to ensure individuals however they get broken so rapidly enough it is hard to discover another arrangement before another shooting happens.

Yet, the issue is that remiss laws time and again make it simple for good citizens to get firearms, as well as for trouble makers to get weapons. The proof is overpowering that general more weapons and more loosened up firearm laws lead to more fierce passing and wounds. According to NYTimes article by Nicholas Kristof 'How to Reduce Shootings', in 1995, Connecticut tightened licensing laws, while in 2007 Missouri eased gun laws. The upshot? In the wake of fixing weapon laws, gun murder rates dropped 40 percent in Connecticut. What's more, after Missouri facilitated firearm laws, weapon crime rates rose 25 percent. There has been advance in attempting to make public area more secure however it is a long way from what things could resemble. Schools and other open spots have issues with subsidizing when endeavoring to expand safety efforts. The media has an issue in this also when they watch out for feature material that can be touchy to a few watchers. Tragically, it is reality that more youthful groups of onlookers are being presented to. Meanwhile, more individuals are concentrating on the most proficient method to remain safe, including what should be possible to avoid different mass shootings.

First, we must repeal the N.R.A.-backed Dickey Amendment, named for the man who sponsored it, former Representative Jay Dickey, an Arkansas Republican. It reads: None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.

With generation that we are in, there are too many tragedies. A passage of new regulations would be a welcome change from our political intransigence and lack of response to our ongoing epidemic of gun violence and mass shootings in this country.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gun Violence in American Culture. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Issue of Gun Violence

Don't you just hate it when you hear about gun violence and how many shootings affected the safety of each and everyone of us in our schools? Well I have something to say about this. Time and time again, our government officials are promising reforms and new laws to protect us kids, but it's just the same thing, they keep failing us all.

Yes, Gun Control is not the only answer to gun violence. One of my reasons is that there are already laws for the ownership of firearms. Let me mention several of them:

  1. You need to be at least 21 years old;
  2. You are never convicted of crime and went to prison for a year;
  3. You need to pass mental and physical (evaluation) testings;
  4. You need to keep the firearms out of reach of minor or you will be liable with any crime as a result of irresponsible handling;
  5. You cannot carry your firearm outside of your house unless you have special permit.

These laws are effective until somebody breaks it and planned to do harm to others. For the record, there have been 247 school shootings from 2013 to 2018. In most instances of these gun violence recorded, minors are able to get hold of their parents firearms and used it to harm students in school. Others are able to buy firearms in the black market. In some States, the background check and mental health evaluation of people trying to buy firearms are not strict enough. Although there are some strict laws to follow with the intention of protecting innocents like you and me. But why is it that gun violence still exist everywhere when we already have existing gun control laws? Well let me tell you .

There is nothing that we can do to stop gun ownership so people are not trying to find ways to prevent its use, especially one that will result to gun violence in school. For that reason, experts are coming up with simple but effective solutions that they think will stop or reduce the number of casualties and victims in an incident. Here are some of their suggestions:

  1. Increase the number of school Counselor with proper training to be accessible to more students with problems;
  2. Educate the parents in identifying signs of child's aggressive behavior;
  3. Eliminate bullying in school. Bullying turns a good person into a bad and desperate individuals which is the main ingredient of revenge;
  4. Increase visibility of Uniformed Men during time that students are outside their school room especially at dismissal;
  5. Create school contingency program similar to earthquake drills;
  6. Teachers should be armed and trained to use one in case of emergency;
  7. School uniforms should be implemented to all K-9 grades to easily identify any outsider;
  8. More Team concept in school learning so nobody will feel let out. Loners are at high risk of doing harm to others.

Although some people may say Oh guns can protect us for self defense when were being attacked or threatened. Yes I know, but there are many more objects you can use for self defense such as batons, tasers, or pepper spray, at least these items can help you get away and hopefully save you. But gun ownership is a fundamental right of a person protected by the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution. Nobody can deny you to have if you comply with the requirements. But be aware that owning a gun is already a risk affecting innocent lives of students! Also according to vox.com a student survivor from the latest mass shooting states that They say that tougher gun laws do not decrease gun violence. and I agree since a law wouldn't change people and how they use firearms.

So given a chance, I think the simple suggestions I mentioned will make an astounding result in reducing if not totally eliminating school gun violence. Prevention is always better than cure as they say. Those steps are simpler than another law requiring our politicians to vote. I'm hoping that actions are now being done and soon to be seen in our school system to avoid another useless loss of young lives which could be mine or anyone in the school around our country.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Issue Of Gun Violence. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

More Gun, more Violence

Have you ever wondered if you would ever be able to go out again without worrying about being shot? Nowadays guns are very popular that is why so many shootings have been happening. The guns used in these shootings are also so much easier to get then you would think. Today is the day that our nation will try to stop these mass shootings starting with changing some laws around. It is important that the laws on gun violence are changed in order to make communities safer, limit the amount of gun owners, as well as making sure that gun owners have the proper training and permits needed to carry a gun.

The first thing that need to be done is making our community's safe again. This needs to be done because nowadays people are scared to go to certain places. In order to do this a ban needs to be put on all assault rifles. These guns shoot at such a fast rate that it could injure people quickly just like in the Sandy Hook shooting. In the article the author states that about 40% of shootings happen with an assault rifle. The assault rifle is also one of the most popular sold guns in the United States. It has been estimated that about 3.3 million assault rifles were sold between 1986 and 2009.

Since there has been so many shootings over the past couple of years a way to stop this is by adding security into school and other places. Some schools may already have good security but it would be better for all schools to have that same privilege. This security consists of metal detectors and a couple of police officers. The metal detectors would be able to detect when someone is bringing a weapon somewhere. Although it is not going to stop all shootings it will definitely do something. Another we can do is have a couple a police officers stay in our schools all day. Doing this would make a safer environment for kids because they know is something were to happen someone would be there to help. This would also make a bigger challenge for the shooter to do something because there are armed police officers inside.

Another reason why so many people are getting their hands on guns is because they are not put in cases. Any person that buys a gun from someone should need to buy a case with it so it is not just laying around somewhere where it could be easily found. In the article the author says that about 1.7 million kids live with unlocked guns. Most of these people keep their guns in a closet or some kind cabinet in their bed room. At least with a case your guns will be locked up where people can't easily get them. The author also stated that about 31 percent of shootings may have been prevented if the gun was in a case. Gun safes would work but the only problem is that no one uses them which is why so many kids have their hands on guns. Gun safes might not be the cheapest things there are but they most certainly are very effective especially when used correctly.

All of this gun violence that is going on could be stopped by limiting the amount of gun owners. We can limit the amount of gun owners by raising the age to being able to own a gun. The age right now to buy a gun in the United States is around 21 years old. The only problem with this is that if you where to buy a gun from an unlicensed sealer the age would be around 18 years old. The age and should be able to buy a gun at is 25. This is because an adult fully matures around the age of 25 and obviously all the younger adults that have guns are irresponsible. Raising the age might not do a lot but it would most certainly stop some people from owning guns.

Since so many people are getting their hands on guns there needs to be a limit on how many they can get. This needs to be done because there is not a law that states how many guns one person could own. A lot of people today own more than one gun which could be very dangerous to us. They could use all of these weapons to hurt a lot of people in a quick way. This is why there needs to be a limit of one to two guns a person can buy. To prove this point we need to look at all of the previous shootings where there was multiple types of bullets found. This proves that in shootings the shooter usually uses more than one gun. This would also be good for limiting the amount of gun owners there are.

Over the past couple of years there has been so much ammunition made that there needs to be checks on how much ammo people have. In the United States alone there is about 10 billion bullets manufactured every year. This means that millions even billions of dollars are wasted every year to make ammunition for guns.This would be a great way to see how much ammo someone has because their are way to many people getting away with thousands of bullets.This would definitely help with finding out if something bad was going to happen. In most shootings there is about 1 to 5 thousands rounds of ammunition used. In most states a person is able to buy ammunition without any oversight. Another thing you can do with ammunition checks is keep deadly bullets out of the hands of civilians.

All gun owners must have the proper permates and traning to own a gun. Most people are able to get away with not having to do anything to get a gun. This is why we need to have background checks on all gun owners. Some gun owners do already get background check but this is only if you get your gun from a licensed gun dealer. So if you do not get your gun from a licensed gun dealer you will not have any background checks on you. This is called a loop hole because the unlicensed sellers are not required to do background checks. Only about 91 percent of America has background checks on them and the other 9 percent has to have further investigations on them. The investigation on whether they have background checks is only aloud to go on for 3 business days. Which means that most of the time people get away with not having background checks.

Something that should have to be done in order to get a gun is proper training. This should be done because not all people know how to use a gun weather they buy it or not. Even some of the school shooters that own guns do not have the proper training that they.This is also good because people can get taught when they really need to use there gun. The only problem with this is that if you buy your gun from an unlicensed dealer you might not get the training you need. Those who buy a handgun are most likely not going to get training compared to those who buy a gun hunting. Around 56 to 58 percent of gun owners actually have the proper training that they need. This means that the other 40 percent of the world does not have any training at all.

In order to limit the amount of shootings our country needs to make it harder to buy guns. This means that you have everything done that needs to be in order to buy a gun. The only hard part about this is that in most states you do not need a permit to buy a gun. In some states you do not need anything to buy a gun not even license or registration. This just shows how bad the process to get a gun really is. This is why we need to in force better laws that will make it harder to get a gun

Placing restrictions on gun ownership and purchases will assure that guns will not be placed in the wrong hands. Hopefully this will help reduce the amount of gun deaths and injuries in America. Accidental gun deaths and injuries, gun related violence and massive shootings and have all become too comin in the United States. Gun violence has caused and excessive amount of trauma on families and communities, and we need to make these communities safer and make them healthy again.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

More gun, More violence. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gun Violence in the US

The Constitution guarantees us rights and liberties that people in most countries do not have. One of those rights, the second amendment, gives us the right to form a militia and bear arms. Firearms have been a huge part of the culture in the United States since our creation, we bear arms to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government like our founding fathers fought against to create this great nation. Recently in our country, we have seen an increase in firearm related crimes. Some argue that firearms are too easily available and should be controlled and regulated by our government, while others argue that a wider variety of people need to own firearms in order to protect themselves and others as well as less restrictions on purchases. A balance would be necessary to not infringe on citizens rights, but to also prevent firearm related crimes to increase.

The statistics that show what exactly is occurring in our nation due to gun violence is diverse. According to the CDC, we see about thirty three thousand firearm related deaths per year. About two/thirds of those deaths were suicides, while another twelve thousand are due to gang on gang violence and homicides. The remaining number is accidental discharges. (Casselman). Gangs are to blame for the rise of firearm related deaths in this country for the majority of statistics seen. We are also seeing an increase in the amount of shootings that occur when a mentally ill person obtains a weapon. Suicide is also a big factor that contributes to thesestatistics. People with depression that are not diagnosed can easily obtain a firearm and use it to commit suicide. First, let's define what gun violence means in this context. According to the CDC, gun violence is the use of a firearm in a criminal act such as assault with a deadly weapon, homicide, and suicide. (Archive) There is a set criteria to decide whether a violent act falls under this definition. For the purpose of this paper, I will be analyzing the statistics of gun violence in four groups. Suicides, defensive gun uses, homicides, and gang related violence. Defensive gun uses are not a major issue because of the fact that people's lives are being saved. That statistic doesn't accurately fit under the violent crime category.

Suicides makes two/thirds of all firearm related violence in recent studies, I see the argument that we must also take into account that someone trying to kill themselves is going to find a way regardless of whether or not they have access to a firearm talked about frequently. Taking away their ability to have access to a firearm will help lower our gun violence statistics, but will end up increasing cause of death for another reason like ODs or death of impact. The fact that so many people end up committing suicide is a problem even bigger than the issue of firearm related deaths that only coincidentally correlates with this issue of suicide and firearms. According to the Harvard Injury Control Research Center, their clinicians often fail to ask about guns or feel uncomfortable broaching the topic, in part because they lack suicide prevention training. (Drexler). Psychologists and psychiatrists of mental patients and client are not trained in suicide prevention when they are dealing with mentally ill people. If someone is diagnosed with a mental illness, the doctor must inform the department of justice about said person so that they will be put on a do not sell list when they try to purchase a firearm. The fact is that some of these people slip through the cracks and are able to purchase a firearm. Bettermeans of mental health awareness are absolutely necessary to combating the amount of firearm

related suicide that is an epidemic in our country and will continue to rise.

Defensive gun uses is a pretty common act in our country. The CDC estimates that the amount of defensive gun uses was somewhere between 2.1 and 2.5 million per year. (Zimmerman) I do not see this as an issue personally considering these acts were in self defense, but this statistic is included in gun violence data. This is a pretty appalling number considering a majority of media outlets do not report on these uses. No one seems to realize that firearms are used more for good than for bad in the United States. I interviewed a candidate for Sutter county sheriff, Brandon Barnes. I asked what his beliefs were on citizens having concealed weapons permits and he replied, I believe that it is our duty to defend ourselves considering we cannot rely on the police to save us every time a life threatening event occurs. I believe Sutter county should be a shall issue county for a CCW license that way more citizens are able to defend themselves as long as they pass the background checks and are not felons. (Barnes). When Barnes said that we cannot rely on the police, it made me think about how fast a police officer arrives to a house or area that's been called in. an average response is about 15-20 minutes and that is plenty of time to take serious bodily injury from someone looking to do harm, so having that concealed weapon could be a life saving action.

Homicides make up about nine thousand of the thirty three thousand figure. This figure also includes when a firearm accidentally discharges and injures or kills the person who discharged it. This is the main statistic that needs to be brought down. If you look at places where the average citizen can obtain a CCW permit, the homicide rates of that city or town tend to be low. If you look at a city where it is nearly impossible to obtain one, homicide rates areusually higher. (GunstoCarry) I believe it is our duty to defend ourselves and prevent homicides or violent crime from occurring. We cannot expect to pass laws restricting firearms and think that all homicides will drop drastically, but we cannot allow just any average person to arm themselves. The government must be able to weed out the few who are dangers to themselves and others from owning a firearm.

Gang on gang violence in rampant in our suburban cities. There always seems to be a war so to say between two or more gangs that end up with unnecessary violence and deaths. The FBI reports, there are thirty three thousand criminally active gangs in the U.S. all use violence to control neighborhoods and boost their illegal money-making activities, which include robbery, drug and gun trafficking, prostitution and human trafficking, and fraud. Many gang members continue to commit crimes even after being sent to jail. (FBI). The amount of unregistered and illegal firearms on our streets continue to create issues for law enforcement and the people that live in these large cities. When an attack is executed like a drive by shooting, bullets can spray off target and hit passer-byers. This violence occurs more frequently and it is because of how easily available illegal weapons are in our community. Law enforcement need more funding to create a well equipped task force to deter and confiscate these illegal firearms. Punishments for being in possession of these firearms need to be harsher in order to set an example for others not to follow the path of those that have been caught. Buy back programs need to be implemented so that those with illegal weapons can turn them into their local police department and get paid a certain amount of money no questions asked. Getting illegal firearms off the streets in big cities and reprimanding people who possess them are the first big step in reducing the amount of gun violence that occurs in our nation.Gun violence in the U.S can be easily lowered without infringing on our second amendment rights. If we can come to agreement as a nation that something needs to be done in order to save lives and prevent disasters from occurring, we will have no trouble implementing ways to reduce the violence we see currently. We can create systems to help catch those with mental illnesses from slipping through the cracks and prevent them from ever purchasing firearms. Providing law abiding citizens with concealed weapons permits can help reduce homicides from happening if those being targeted can protect themselves. Funding local police departments to create task forces to confiscate illegal firearms on the street and from gang members must happen. If we sit idly by while gun violence continues to rise, more and more unnecessary deaths will occur and continue to taint the image of our country. Those that live in countries besides the US do not understand why we cannot control the amount of violence that happens and don't solve our problems like their home countries have. (Vox). We as a country need to realize that this issue is not normal and come together to prevent this violence.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gun Violence in the US. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Effects of Gun Violence on the Society

The one thing that I think that should change in this world these days is gun violence. Because sometimes people take gun violence too far and they shouldn't take it that far. School shootings, public places, and unlocked weapons.

All schools these days are getting worse each day and more unsafe for these kids to attend school with all of these kids bringing guns to the school and shooting all of these kids and teachers. Like this need to stop right now these people don't deserve to die especially the kids they're too young there parents will never see them get married and have kids. It's just sad what people do these days to the kids at school. No wonder why some kids are scared to go to school because they think that will happen to them one day and they will never see their families again.

The same thing goes for public shooting like the shooting at the clubs and concerts basically anywhere you go these innocent people are getting harmed and killed by these people who starts the shootings. I think the people who are causing these shootings need to get some help and get there life straight because they're putting these kids and other people lives in danger and it just needs to stop because it makes me sick how these innocent people are dying because of these shootings.

Lastly, having guns unlocked and just laying around is really bad especially if you have kids. I think all weapons especially guns should be locked away in a safe or something so our kid can't get to it. Because one day your child could find it and start playing around with it not knowing it's real and there's bullets in it and the child can accidently shoot itself or someone else and that's not good because you can get sued and get charged a lot of money. I just want to change this so bad because of all of these innocent

People dying because of these shootings that are going on. I think guns should be locked away for good unless it's an emergency. I think the only time we should use guns is for emergencies only. And not use guns just for fun because these kids will never grow up and have kids and get married. So this needs to end because I want this world to be a better place where everyone can be happy and safe, and doesn't have to worry about shootings. And the kids can be safe going to school without all of this going on.

In conclusion, I would love to get rid of gun violence because of the school shootings, unlocked guns. And public shootings. I hope I can be able to change this one day because it would be amazing if I could just put an end to all of this.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Effects Of Gun Violence On The Society. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Guns: the Root of all Violence?

Gun violence has aroused disputable controversies, both about the causes and solutions surrounding firearms. As time has progressed, the occurrence of mass shootings have become a dominant topic in the media, resulting in the question: should we outlaw guns? The second amendment, created in 1789, vocalizes man's right to bear arms. However, the escalating deaths originating from firearms displays the irreversible impacts these weapons have. Prominent examples include the Sandy Hook, Pulse Nightclub, Marjory Stoneman Douglas, and the Texas Church Shootings, all occurring within a ten year time period. The definition of a mass shooting described by the FBI is an incident where four or more people are wounded or killed, the United States holding one third of these events. The Brady Bill, implemented in 1993 became a large stepping stone for gun control, leading to 976,000 denials of licenses in 2003. While some people argue that mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and societal illness like toxic masculinity contribute to the detrimental effects of gun violence, others argue that mental illnesses do not contribute to the effects of gun violence; possible solutions to correct this issue would be extensive background checks and the ban of bumper stocks.

Mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and problematic stigmas surrounding the definition of masculinity, consisting of the glorification of violence and hostile behavior, contribute to gun violence. People with mental illnesses are a hazard to the public, as 60% of perpetrators of mass shootings in the United States since 1970 displayed symptoms including acute paranoia, delusions, and depression before committing their crimes (Ruddell). The 60% of those who possessed a mental illness had access to firearms, allowing the tragic deaths of children, mothers, and innocent bystanders to occur. Patients with spontaneous and aggressive impulses should not have access to hazardous weapons, since one consequence could be communities that are haunted with gruesome memories of the casualties. Those with mental illnesses should be restricted from accessing firearms due to their unawareness of wrong and right, potentially leading to permanent misfortunes. Specific mental illnesses in conjunction with fatal weapons jeopardize the safety of communities and lead to destruction, all of which are easily preventable with meticulous background checks. Additionally, toxic masculinity has contributed to gun violence. Many boys from a young age are bombarded with the constant exposure of gore and violence, induced by brutal video games, inappropriate toys, and war. Many are expected to push aside their natural instinct of fear and face grave conditions with a brave face. If they falter, they would be perceived as fragile and unworthy of the title as a man. Myritten states, men with weapons have the power, men are often expected by tradition to be either warriors and/or protectors, and failure to live up to these expectations leads to violence. Society assumes that dominance is tethered to the perfect image of a man, as boys from a young age have been embedded with the expectation to obtain leadership positions. If the expectations of a man are not fulfilled, these consisting of being emotionless, courageous, and the breadwinners of the household, they are considered less of a one. The perpetual cycle that men encounter because of society's' suffocating guidelines of what actions men are allowed to perform, contribute to men's desensitization of violence. The cycle that was forged on boys by society at a tender age causes men to become bound to their accustomed habits of normalizing war and violence. Mental illnesses such a schizophrenia and destructive social stigmas are one of the causes for gun violence.

The notion that mental illnesses are the cause of gun violence largely categorizes a vast number of people as unstable, ruthless characters. The media is one of the culprits, as they frame those with mental illnesses to be belligerent patients. Siegel displays the influence social media has, as news stories describing acts of gun violence by persons with SMI (Severe mental illnesses) may exacerbate negative attitudes about an already stigmatized population. The phrase mental illness already holds a negative connotation and is a topic that is often submerged. Often, the media depicts those suffering from mental illnesses as corrupt citizens, resulting in the sway of public opinion to restrict firearms from patients instead of banning the weapons themselves. Large social media platforms do not specify each condition such a paranoia, schizophrenia, severe depression and anxiety. Instead, the media largely categorizes a vast, diverse population to depict a stereotypical hostile individual. Additionally, civilians with the intent to harm others are difficult to detect as we lack tools capable of accurately identifying persons with SMI (severe mental illnesses) who are at heightened risk of committing future violence (McGinty). The media sheds an unflattering light on those with mental illnesses and presents them all as dangerous criminals; however, these mental illnesses are difficult to read and examine. Mental illness is a complex subject and has varying causes, the inaccuracy exhibited by social media to group them all in the same category displays ignorance. Although research has shown that those with mental illnesses have attributed to gun violence, detecting and predicting a pattern in patients is difficult. There is not a specific guideline or rubric to follow when one is attempting to predict a patient's intent to proceed with a mass shooting. Therefore, mental illnesses do not contribute to gun violence and its attention should be refocused to banning guns as a whole.

Extensive background checks should be continued, eliminating the mentally ill from retrieving these firearms. Rigorous checks should be implemented instead of hasty glances at a candidates' background. Research has shown a positive impact involving how background check rates are associated with...significant decreases in the rate of gun accidents, and insignificant increases in firearm suicide (Friedman). The data shown enforces that background checks have decreased the rate of gun activity, concluding that the mentally ill should be restricted from retrieving weapons. Communities would transform into safer atmospheres, void of criminal activity and gruesome scenes of murders. The rate of activity would continue to drop if extensive checkups were placed along with routine monthly checks. If suspicious activity is found or reported, authoritative figures could delve into the situation and resolve the problem. As a result, the candidate would become cleared or have their gun privileges revoked. Moreover, those with certain mental illnesses are reported to have erratic tendencies and are difficult to restrain. Lang emphasizes the importance of discussion involving mental illnesses as there was a link with aggressiveness and those possessing a mental illness, as those with schizophrenia, major depression, or bipolar disorder ” were two to three times as likely as people without such an illness to be assaultive. The author does not generalize the entire population of those with mental illnesses, but specifies those that have the potential to be harmful. The rate of aggressiveness stemming from those with specific mental illnesses provides a statistical view as to how they could wreak havoc on communities. Disorders such as schizophrenia and depression retain sporadic impulses that can increase aggressiveness, leading to violence. The startling probability that those with mental illnesses are two to three times more likely to perform assaults should be alarming and cause a response for action. If in depth background checks were practiced, candidates that raised warning signals would promptly be denied. Extensive background checks would be a safety precaution to eliminate impulsive, unfit candidates. Countless lives could be saved if frequent background checks are installed.

A bumper stock is an accessory that enables consumers to fire bullets faster, shortening the time it takes for a gun to recoil after a shot is fired. These attachments should be banned to decrease the number of potential bullets fired from those suffering from mental illnesses and those without. The accessory should not be permitted, as it transforms a regular firearm to a perilous automatic weapon used in war. Many influential figures have spoken, one being Bill Flores as he expressed there's no reason for a typical gun owner to own anything that converts a semi-automatic to something that behaves like an automatic (Elis). The representative of Texas, a republican state, has contradicted the routine view of guns. Bill Flores, a credible source and a representative of a pro firearm state displays the problematic impacts of firearms. The disasters that have been afflicted by bumper stocks outweighs what might be described as the benefits of these accessories. The conversion of firing a few to hundreds of bullets in minutes is a dramatic and alarming change. The action should be prohibited, as many citizens, including those with mental illnesses could abuse its ability. Hunters have excused the casualties caused by bumper stocks by describing the enjoyment of ruthlessly hunting animals using the accessory. Hunting meek innocent animals compared to the anarchy that guns have caused in the United States displays Americans absurd priorities. Bumper stocks have been the cause of tragedies in the United States have included the use of bumper stocks, one being the gunman who killed 59 people at a Las Vegas concert Sunday (Bolton). The Las Vegas mass shooting is the most detrimental event in United States history involving guns. The heightened impact of bumper stocks is displayed in this instance, as the accessory was abused for malicious intent. Stephen Paddock, the perpetrator, was documented using the a bumper stock that accelerates the recoiling of a gun. Easily, Paddock fired hundreds of bullets into what was once a peaceful crowd. By banning bumper stocks, a dramatic decline in the death tolls involving gun activities would occur. This would result in safer environments for future generations to enjoy, without the lurking threats of mass shootings in unexpected settings.

Firearms should be regulated due to its irreversible impacts on American citizens and U.S. history. These weapons of war have subjected our children, friends, and loved ones in a constant state of unexpected peril. Families fear to send their children to school, in hopes that they safely return without a bullet wound. A lack of gun education, background checks, and stricter firearm laws have made locations such as churches, schools, and the movie theaters targets for horrific massacres. Firearms are the culprit for the robbing of thousands of innocent lives every year and the need to banish these weapons become more and more apparent. The United States has confronted traumatic experiences due to firearms, as these weapons have imprinted images of bloodshed in citizens minds. If these weapons were abolished or regulated strictly, the United States could have the opportunity to reconcile and heal from the countless lives lost. News broadcasting another mournful mass shooting would become nonexistent to upcoming generations contrasting to how citizens today have been desensitized because of its frequency. If these weapons were banned or closely regulated, a state of harmony could be reached due to the silencing the sound of bullets, the cries of innocent victims, and the protests of the concerned.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Guns: The Root Of All Violence?. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Playing Violent Video Games Causes Gun Violence

Trump is suggesting that violent video games and films are at least partly responsible for the rise and persistence of gun violence in the US.

It's an argument that dates back to the Columbine High School shooting in 1999.

The two Columbine High School gunmen were active "Doom" players. Since the game primarily focuses on shooting a gun ” at demons, in outer space ” commentators suggested that the gunmen had trained for the real-life shooting by playing "Doom." The game featured a gun as the main point of interaction and perspective ” the "first-person shooter" was a relatively new concept in video games back in 1999 ” and thus arose suspicion.

If these teenage gunmen were playing this game, and capable of committing such a horrific act, what did that mean for all the other kids playing these games?

Doom (original, PC)

The original "Doom" on PC looks rudimentary by 2018 standards. It was one of the first-ever first-person shooter games. id Software/Bethesda Softworks

But there's a simple reason why that doesn't make much sense: "The same video games played in the US are played worldwide; however, the level of gun violence is exponentially higher in the US than in other countries."

That's according to the Entertainment Software Association, the group that represents major video game industry stakeholders like Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Activision, EA, and others. It's not surprising that the trade group representing the video game industry feels this way ” but it's a hard point to argue.

Though first-person shooter games like "Call of Duty," "Battlefield," and "Halo" are popular with American video game players, they're also popular all over the world. The game industry is a global market, with platforms like the PlayStation 4 that serve territories with extremely restrictive gun laws and territories with relatively lax gun laws.

Even though these games are played all over the world, the United States is a standout statistically in terms of gun violence. If violent games were causing violent behavior, it stands to reason that the connection would be more consistent around the world.

Whether or not it's good for children to be exposed to graphical violence in games, or theatrical violence in movies, isn't clear. It probably isn't. What is clear is that playing violent games and watching violent movies doesn't directly cause violent behavior. We have the evidence to prove it, and it's staring us right in the face.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Playing Violent Video Games Causes Gun Violence. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Why Gun Violence is Getting Worse

Guns are the reason for most homicides in america, they cause more and more damage each year, and recently in the past few years it has gotten worse due to mass shootings.So far this year only there has been about 307 mass shooting in America. The number of people who die do to gun violence is 96 and about 250 people get shot and survive. Overall, 64 percent of deaths were determined to be homicides, while an additional 27 percent were suicides and 9 percent were accidental shootings(Santhanam). This is the horrifying statistics of this country and yet, there is no major changes made. Although many people feel like guns area big part of protection, it's only causing more and more madness by the day and getting it under control will save many lives. If there is new gun laws passed, that gives the people of this country insurance that innocent people won't continuously lose their life.

Growing up and going to public elementary/schools, I am grateful nothing of such tragedy like school shootings has ever happened when I was there, but I can't help and think that there is innocent children losing their lives at such a young age from gun violence at a place where your expected to feel safe. This year one of the biggest school shooting was in Florida on Wednesday, February 14. A student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School named Nicolas Cruz, came to school where he opened fire killing 14 student and 3 teachers.

The gun, a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 .223, was purchased at Sunrise Tactical Supply, according to the Associated Press.Federal law allows people 18 and older to legally purchase long guns, including this kind of assault weapon. With no criminal record, Cruz cleared an instant background check via the FBI criminal database (Jansen).

He was not even asked questions because he passed a simple background check, this and many other incidence should have brought awareness to congress that you should only have to be 18 and have a clear background in order to go out and purchase such a dangerous weapon.

There should be more than just background checks in order to purchase a gun, for example mental health is important and having mental illness can be dangerous to have and dangerous towards other people if you don't receive the help that you need. The reality is that most people with personality disorders do not seek treatment and are not known to mental health providers(Mental illness and gun laws: What you may not know about the complexities.) People even fail to acknowledge their mental illnesses because of the society we live in, and I honestly don't blame them either because most people believe that they will get bullied and made fun of by others, but by getting the help they need it might not reach a point where they might want to harm themselves or others.

It's important to note that those with diagnosed serious mental illness, who are determined by a psychiatrist to be a serious risk of harm to themselves or others, already get admitted to acute or long-term inpatient care and are kept there until they are deemed not dangerous (Mental illness and gun laws: What you may not know about the complexities.)

Can it be that hard for congress to make a law to ban guns that would actually help benefit people? I strongly believe that adding this simple law would save hundreds of people from hurting themselves or hurting others.

Most gun and shooting accidents involve children who find unsecured, loaded guns around the house or in the family car. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement says, "The absence of guns from children's homes and communities is the most reliable and effective measure to prevent firearm-related injuries in children and adolescents." However, many families have firearms at home and gun ownership has not decreased in recent years( Iannelli.)

Parents are getting these firearms for protection but in result loosing their own children because they are not properly putting them away and keeping them out of children's reach.In the span of two years almost 1,330 children have died from accidently shooting themselves and other children. A lot who have young children are not only not putting them far enough from children and they are most likely keeping their guns loaded with the bullets in the magazine.

There has not been anything dramatically done to change the law of guns and there has barely nothing been done to control the issue. There is many other countries who have their gun controls under control or banned and that seems to be working for them, they don't have the same issues as America with all these extreme mass shootings. For example Canada does not ban guns but they do have strict laws for them such as: gun owners can not carry outside of their homes unless its part of their job, all guns must be kept locked away and they cannot be loaded, also they require safety training for owners.

I've lived in Minnesota for majority of my life, I have not witnessed many people die until I was about 15, and my brothers best friend was shot and murdered in burnsville MN. I remember him going through the worst depression I could emagine. It hurt him to know that his best friend life was taken from him so brutally and it made him more angry as years passed by. It was just something he couldn't get through and he didn't want to talk to anyone about. It continue to worry me me to see him not want to talk to anyone and distance himself from everything he loved, and I finally got the courage to ask him why he was still mad instead of being sad? He replied to me because he was shot and killed He then continued to explain to me that if it was natural cause that killed him he would not have the madness in his heart. As time went on we spent a lot of time together and I got him to go back and do the things he loved, and he started to enjoy life again because he noticed living that way was not healthy.

About 2 years passed and on January 24, 2016 one of my friends lost their brother also due to gun violence. This one hurt very much, not just to see my friend and her family feel what's they were feeling but also the fact that I also knew him. He was a kind, sweet, caring person and only 19 when he was shot and murdered. His life was not worth what he died over and I knew that this feeling of losing a loved one was only going to get worse for her and her family due to the fact that not only did he die, but someone took his life with a gun. A lot of these people who go and shoot people only think in that moment and that person but they fail to understand that people will have a hard time continuing with their lives because that person whose life they took has people that care and love them. I also remember going to his funeral and my friend asking me to go into the room her brother was being washed in. When we went in, she automatically broke down, and I've never been in such shock my life. He laid over us with five bullets in this chest and one in his head. His blood no longer running in his body and his body looking so dull. I broke down and just couldn't understand how someone could be so cruel and be so inhumane to do such thing. I watched his mother kiss him on his forehead and say goodbye as tears went down her face.It broke my heart to see her say goodbye to her son that only got to live 19 years of life.

We then buried him and everyone that came soon started to get in their cars and leave because it was so cold. I sat at his grave with my friend and just watched her. She told me that she was so angry at the other man who took her brothers life with a gun. I remember talking about this with my brother and automatically that conversation came to my mind. I then started to notice that them being shot and murdered was making it harder to move on for her as well. I knew that this was going to be a tough time for her so I made sure to around as much as I could be so that she doesn't exclude herself from people and things she also loves doing.

That same year in November 26th, I remember getting a call and being told that my brother was shot. I didn't know how it feel, I didn't know if he was dead or alive, I just remember my blood pressure rising and my body become completely frozen. I was at my cousins house and they wondered what was wrong and kept tapping me, i just started to cry and think the worst, after a few minutes of sitting there and breaking down my phone rang and it was his girlfriend to tell me that she was at the hospital and that he was shot in this rist and he was going to be fine. I was relieved that he was alive but still crying because if the fact that he was hurt, I ended up going to the hospital and seeing him sit on the bed asleep with a huge cast and just hug him and restful te was alive. Once he was awake he told me that he was outside of a restaurant in Minneapolis and there was a group of men in a car and let shots fired in front of the restaurant. He told me he was standing outside with his friend and as soon as he realized what was happening told me ran behind a car and before he got there hiding his head with his and and that's when he got shot.

I was so happy he was alive and although the doctor told him the bones in his wrist completely shattered and that they would have to put a metal piece to hold his hand straight up. The doctor also let him know that he would never be able to move his wrist up and down again. I knew that was frustrating for him. He didn't deserve what happened to him and it made me angry to know that someone shot him and to know that him and many other innocent people standing outside that restaurant could have died that day. I noticed that day the damage that guns were doing to people and the amount of other people only have to deal with being shot or their loved ones of theirs either being shot and hurt, or being shot and murdered.

Not long after that many boys from the city i'm from who are somali were shot and murdered. It's like it was getting worse by the months and I think i was realizing more because I was getting older. I went to about another funeral in December,2016 from this boy who didn't know but went to the same islamic school when we were younger. Being at his funeral only made me remember the last time i was there for the same case. It made me sad to see mothers and families cry once again. It made me more sad to know that his cause of death was because of a gun.

After a while things started to calm down and on June,11 2017 I remember being at work on break and getting another call from my other brother and him telling me that he was shot in the leg the night before and quickly saying that he would be fine and that the doctores got the bullet out. I didn't want to cry because I was just so confused, I just wanted to leave and go to the hospital and be there with him. So that's exactly what did, without telling anyone I just left. I called my sister and told her the exact thing he told me. Me and my whole family met at the hospital and by that time he has a cast and he was just happy to see us. He was shot in an apartment complex by a guy looking for another man and mistaken him for my brother.

It has only gotten worse in minneapolis with gun violence, I have been to 3 funerals this year alone of 3 young men, the oldest being 25 being shot and killed. Every Time I was there I would remember seeing the others who I came for. About a week ago a student from Saint Paul College who was out with his cousins and friends were playing with guns and his cousin accidentally shot him in the face. He was fighting for his life and was brain dead. He ended up just dying December 11, 2018. I've never met or seen him, but my sister told me she had class with him and telling me how much of sweet and funny boy he was. I'm not sure how old he was but he was surely not over the age of 22.

Gun violence is only getting worse, and writing this paper only made me realize that some

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Why Gun Violence is Getting Worse. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Role of the Media in the Disparate Response to Gun Violence in America

There have been many cases of gun violence in America. For example, the school shooting that occurred in December 2012 in which 20 elementary school children were victims. This was one of the cases in which after plenty of shootings, both political and community leaders began to get involved. Many believe that the cause of awareness was because of the shootings in Newton. Regardless, of the prior shootings, statistics determine that many of the children involved in shootings resulted to be children of color, of which a majority of them come from low-income homes and neighborhoods in which they already encounter gun violence. Although it is widely known and often portrayed by the media that a mass of shootings occur in neighborhoods inhabited by a majority of Blacks it never has an equivalent result compared to the shootings in Newton. It is argued the lack of attention given these groups of children and people derives from the way the media depicts them to be.

The way the media has addressed Blacks versus Whites in the past has had a major effect in the interest of people. The stereotypes developed about Blacks may have been influential in the concern and empathy of media directors, which ultimately leads to the concern of the general population. The majority cause of homicides derives from gun violence and the greater part seem to be from Black descent. This includes males from the ages of 10 and 24, which are also more likely to be a victim of gun violence than anyone else. Studies demonstrate that Black minors were more likely to be victims of school shooting than their White counterparts. Those who survived were left with signs of post-traumatic disorders that could eventually lead to further danger in the lives of other minors. During the course of history, racial minorities have been negatively portrayed in the media. movie roles often portrayed stereotypes of racial minorities that included criminals, prostitutes, drug dealers, and drug users. In these results, Black women are often portrayed as immoral and, since then, widely perceived erotic others.

In a similar way, Black males have been perceived as savages and criminals. Blacks in particular, have held stereotypes existing among the general U.S. society. News outlets almost never show Blacks as victims. On the contrary, studies have revealed that news stations disproportionately choose to focus on Blacks as the assailants or perpetrators. The ability to associate Blacks as victims becomes increasingly difficult. News stories involving a Black victim are rarely given much attention, journalists do not find such stories as newsworthy. According to their study on the news value of Black victims, Weiss and Chermak (1998) noted, News media treat murders of African-Americans as being less important than murders of white victims. News selection decisions, and how events are presented to the public, are driven by what is considered extraordinary. The results indicate that race plays an important role in the decision making processes of news personnel. Murders involving African-Americans, in general, are considered ordinary. (p. 82) The fact that local news stations rarely feature stories involving Blacks as the victim indicates a lack of empathy among the viewing audience (Pritchard & Hughes, 1997).

Therefore the viewing audience is unable to understand Blacks as being victims versus being assailants (Bjornstrom et al., 2010; Eschholz et al., 2003). By focusing heavily on crime stories, news outlets effectively construct a subjective reality that makes the viewing audience believe that crime is more common than it actually is (Callahan, 2012; Eschholz et al., 2003; Gerbner, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1982). It sustains that crime is simply the cultural norm in urban areas including the deaths of children or minors as a part of that norm (Levine et al., 2012; Miller, 2010; Weiss & Chermak, 1998). As a result, the deaths of children or minors are viewed as nothing new. So those who live outside of such areas think the issue is something from which they are not part of, and therefore, not something for which they should be concerned. In conclusion, the historical and ongoing portrayal of Blacks in the media has maintained the negative stereotypes of Blacks as part of a culture that is violent and aggressive. The media has set upheld a depiction of Blacks as criminally inclined. Consequently, the rate at which children and minors within the inner city lose their lives to gun violence is generalized as manifestations of a norm among low-income Blacks. Efforts to resolve gun violence have been the responsibility of people within those communities suffering from gun violence. As a result, the numbers of Black minors who lose their lives, often on school grounds, go unnoticed.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Role of the Media in the Disparate Response to Gun Violence in America. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Issues of Gun Violence and Animal Cruelty in America and how to Solve them

My name is Reid, and I go to Grace Church School. I am writing to you on the matters of stopping animal cruelty and gun violence. The number of deaths from shootings has risen dramatically over the past few years. Animal cruelty is still a problem in the United States. In four states the animal cruelty punishments apply only if the offender is accused more than once. This has to change. We need to stop the problems of gun violence and animal cruelty before they get even worse.

Gun violence in the U.S.A. is on the rise. A study shown in 2012 shows that an assault in the US is triple as likely to involve guns as other countries such as Canada, Spain, and the UK. Every day 96 Americans are killed by guns, and many more are harmed. Grace Church School has had a firsthand experience from gun violence, a teacher was killed in a shooting at the high school. There should be stricter laws on the right to bear arms. Some examples could be: Checking history for signs of depression, not giving guns to those who are mentally unstable, raising the gun age from 18 to 21, a restriction on gun magazines that are too big. The last one not directly stop an attack, but would reduce the fatalities in the case of attack. I ask you to consider these. Gun violence is a major issue in America.

Another major issue in this country is animal abuse. The states (Ohio, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and Iowa) have laws that only punish subsequent offenders. Another issue is dog fighting. It is illegal, and rightfully so, but there are some problems in the laws. In Hawaii and Montana there is no punishment to be a spectator. Without spectators the people that dog fight would go bankrupt thus, ending dog fighting. We need to fix the laws in Ohio, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and Iowa to target first time offenders, and we also need to change the laws in Montana and Hawaii to make watching a dog fight illegal.

Gun violence and animal cruelty are two important issues that this country should tackle. To prevent gun violence, taking new safety measures on who receives guns would be helpful, as would keep a limit on the magazine size. Animal cruelty can be prevented by all states convicting an offender regardless of if it his or her first time, and by banning the watch of dog fights. Animal cruelty and gun violence are tearing the world apart, but you have the power to put it back together.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Issues of Gun Violence and Animal Cruelty in America and How to Solve Them. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Gun Regulations

Gunshots ricocheted off the cold brick walls of the school hallway. Screams were followed by thumps, a sure sign another life had been lost. Cowering behind the podium, Ryan watched the doorknob shake with ferocity, fear settling with an icy feeling in his gut. The door finally gave way, the intruder bursting into the room. Their gun spit smoke into the air, metal getting its first taste of iron, calcium, iron, and brick, in that order, leaving a family with one less child to return home that day. There has been an average of one school shooting per week this year, which makes up just a small percentage of the 331 mass shootings which have occurred in the US in 2018. (Gun) Gun regulations in our country must be more strictly enforced to do something about this issue.

The prevalence of the economic aspect of gun violence is tearing its way through the United States in forms of medical bills, higher tax payments, security enhancements, loss of property value, and decreased wages. The yearly cost of gun violence is 229 billion dollars, 49 billion coming from lost economic contributions and wages from both victims and shooters. Loss of quality of life accounts for another 169 billion. (United) The average American household income is 59,039 dollars, meaning it would take 3.9 million years of a normal citizens earnings to match the cost. Taxpayers are held accountable for reimbursing half of that amount, an average of 12.8 million dollars per day which is considered a low estimation. (Statistics) However, this expense is not distributed evenly. From current data, it has been deducted that states with more extensive and smart gun regulations and laws save money while also saving lives. In a recent study it was discovered that when gun violence rates had a surge, home value decreased by four percent. A study in Washington, DC revealed that every 10 less gun incidents was closely related to one less business closing, one new business opening, twenty new jobs, and an extra 1.3 million dollars in revenue for businesses. (Economic)

Gun regulations also need to be constructed, purely for the cause of safety for America's citizens. So far this year almost 14,000 people have died from gun violence. (Gun) Seven children and teens are killed by a firearm on an average day. Guns also have a higher fatality rate over other weapons. (Survival) People often use the phrase guns don't kill people, people do. Yes, guns may not be able to kill someone on its own in the literal sense, but they enable a person to have that ability in an easy fashion. They also make killing easier for the perpetrator than with using other objects such as knives, because of its ability to kill multiple people with a simple holding down of a trigger, along with their ability to cause mass destruction from far away, and the fact that if someone doesn't know how to use a firearm properly, they are still able to contribute to multiple deaths and injuries. Our country has the largest ratio of guns in the hands of citizens with an average of 88.8 guns per one hundred people. Serbia, the second highest, has a ratio of only 58.2 firearms per one hundred people. Handguns killed 52 people in Canada in 2012, 48 people in Japan, and eight citizens in Great Britain. The US had a much higher rate of handguns killing 10,728. (Shammas) At the root, guns are designed and manufactured as a means to kill or injure. When you view the proposition of gun control with that realization, the perspective changes. People try to solve the problem of gun violence with more guns. Far more assets at much less cost than guards Attacks would end! tweeted President Donald Trump in regard to arming teachers with guns. (Trump) Obviously we should arm all of our educators with firearms, because the willingness and ability to kill someone should be a quality that someone who wants to teach a kid how to add and subtract should have, right? Adding more guns into the mix is doing the opposite of protecting American citizens, and instead adding an increased danger.

Reducing gun violence isn't all about creating more laws, but also about adapting and strictly enforcing the ones we already have. The background check system we have in place is filled with loopholes, the major one involving a private trade of firearms. If you were to buy a gun from someone privately selling, you would not be obligated to a background check. Even in instances where someone is buying from a public company, background checks have not always been taken seriously. In December of 2016 Dylann Roof killed nine people in a church in Charleston. Roofe obtained his guns in 2015, even after admitting to having counts of felony drug possession which should have rendered him unqualified to purchase a firearm. (Lopez) Another example would be Devin P. Kelley, who shot and killed twenty six people who were at church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Kelley was removed from the Air Force in 2012 on account of domestic violence charges, none of which were put on his record for future background checks. If it had been he would have been rendered incapable of passing the standard feudal background check which is supposed to be administered by licensed gun dealers. (Lopez) By enforcing our laws and adding to them to eradicate loopholes, we can make a safer country.

On a large scale, what do we consider more important, innocent lives or our right to own an aggregate of lethal firearms? Gun violence is affecting today's youth dramatically, and needs to be tamed. It is up to us to form a greater and safer future, not only for ourselves, but future generations as well. We must work together to lessen this crisis, and address all faces of gun violence and how it affects others. Working together towards a common goal of peace and safety, we together can make change happen. We have a right to life and the pursuit of happiness, so let's fight for it.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Gun Regulations. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Violence – Problem in our Society

What a breezy day! Olivia thought as she skipped along the sidewalk holding on to her father's hand. Acknowledging his every move, she thought, Daddy is so handsome; I kind of look like him! As Oliva and her family finished up their afternoon walk around their neighborhood, talks about going to the movies got Oliva and her three siblings excited. Hurrying to get home, they noticed Sergio the neighbor had stormed out of his house yelling; in his hand, he carried a gun! Fear and panic filled Olivia's little heart. Run, run, daddy let's run home! were the last words Olivia said as Sergio fatally shot her and her handsome daddy. This unfortunate and dreadful story is as real as night and day. According to NBC News, Olivia Stoffel and her father were victims of a rage disorder.

Army veteran Sergio Valencia del Toro, after a fight with his girlfriend, shot a stranger and turned his gun on the Stoffels (NBC News). After extensive research on the shooter's background history, police discovered that Sergio had an extensive history of psychiatric problems and suicide treats, a drinking problem and yet with his condition, he owned a .9mm semiautomatic pistol and eight more other guns at home, which he bought, because he had no criminal record. A gun at home makes homicide three times more likely, suicide up to five times as likely, and accidental death four times higher than a non-gun owning homes, according to Children's Defense. As a constitutional right to own guns, when will the government draw the line, with gun owners who have a clean criminal record but have a mental illness? When will parent who own guns, learn that it is imperative to have full control of access where children cannot find them? Gun violence has become a developing problem in our society. We hear about mass shootings at schools, children killing children as an outrage of anger, and women being victims of domestic violence and murdered by their domestic partners. How do these individuals gain access to these weapons? As the law states that we do have the right to bear arms but does this law favor society as whole? Is owing a gun, because the second amendment states we can, mandatory? Guns should not be put in the wrong hands of the wrong individuals.

Guns need to be locked away in safes where only the owner can access it. New gun control laws need to be created to give our future generations an opportunity to live in a violence free world. But, why do people feel that they need to own a gun? According to the Gallup poll from 2005, protection is the main reason why people own guns. This is rather a very controversially point, granted there are many alternatives for a person to protect themselves. I am strong believer that families who have children should never own a gun, in fact, should seek alternative protective measures. As a parent, I have always questioned whether my home should be a place where a gun resides or are there alternatives for my family's protection. After further research, I have come across alternatives that till this day are worth more to me than buying a gun. Placing our home under surveillance will not always guarantee protection, but according to the Ad council 3 out of 5 burglars will seek an alternative target if there is an alarm or home security system onsite, such as guard dogs. Although I favor gun control, if I have the opportunity to change the laws about families owning guns, I would incline to a gun free home.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Violence - Problem in Our Society. (2019, Mar 20). Retrieved November 5, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/03/page/12/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay
Stop wasting your time searching for samples!
You can find a skilled professional who can write any paper for you.
Get unique paper