The Drug Addiction Recovery

Apart from the high attention that alcohol and drugs get on campuses, inadequate resources and support are given to students suffering from drug addiction and alcoholism. Souleymanov (2016) articulates that professionals in affairs concerning students are positioned strategically to support students concerned with various strategies. This essay is going to argue why students recovering from drug addiction and alcoholism should be given special support from their colleges and universities. It is clear that universities such as Georgia Kennesaw State are bringing out graduates that are all round and better the community towards achieving a drug-free state and nation. Froeschle (2004) asserts that the experience in college is exciting, although stressful, for the new students who are experiencing life away from home for the first time.

This stress is fueled by learning to keep up with a lot of academic demands while engaging in unfamiliar social circles. Moreover, for many college students, they are ushered in by alcohol and parting. Millson (2016) asserts various Amenities in the US are giving support to their students who have chosen to quit the addiction. Many universities have chosen to follow these criteria by inventing communities for recovering students, which mainly focuses on clubhouses in campus, opportunities in recreation, support academically and courses for recovery. The recovery stations offered by the select universities include; hang out with study pods for sober students, houses, sober pool game tables and 12-step meetings and other board games.

Various universities have chosen to launch activities in their institutions with the hope that they will eventually serve many students. The students include addicts, adult students, and siblings of substance abusers. With a starting budget of $10,000 from funds in their health service, various recovery counseling are offered, recovery courses towards helping sufferers and activities that are alcohol and drug-free. The Universities Kumari (2015) states aim is to help students evade tempting situations. Moreover, Universities are dedicating their staff and space towards its upcoming program for recovery.

The demographics between 18 and 24 has proved to be multiplying among students seeking treatment for alcoholism and drug addiction. Froeschle (2004) asserts that over the year, the amount of students in this age bracket that are seeking recovery aid has doubled in comparison with the growth of 9% among the 25-year-old category. This statistic was done in various universities in the state. Having five or more drinks on various occasions within a month is a trend that is popular with the youth aged 20 to 22 in the United States. The highest demographic within that age bracket is college students.

The advice given to students exiting treatment Students exiting treatment is to travel from their homes to school until they achieve a certain period without drugs. Eisenberg (2007) stated that a significant threat that people recovering from abuse of drugs face in their quest towards sobriety is being around schoolmates and activities involving alcohol and drugs. This step is rather tough for them to cope with for they are used to a life in which everybody around them is sober.

Almasdy (1991) asserts that staying sober for young people in college can be quite hard. Most colleges and universities give low services if any for the students attempting to get sober or maintain. In many occasions, the sole recovery is a 12-step meeting that mostly comprises of students between 18 and 20 and the communities neighboring. The Steps were created to establish a formula for the best means of overcoming addiction to alcohol and drugs.

As the program was starting it proved to be successful for other support groups of addiction to ape these steps towards recovery. Nonetheless, Millson (2016) asserts that people who were not religious still found this system successful towards being sober in university. The students were able to stay healthy in their endeavors in school. The steps focus on the existence of God as participants know Him, allowing for numerous interpretations and beliefs religiously. The first step entails acknowledging that we gave, were without might over alcohol that we live lives we can’t manage.

Souleymanov (2016) articulates that the second step having belief that power more significant than us can bring us to our true selves. The third step is to decide on turning our will and lives to the hands of God in how we believe he is. The next step is to create a fearless and searching inventory that is moral of us. God other human beings and ourselves are the reflections of our wrongdoings is what we should acknowledge. The sixth step is recognizing that you are ready to let God take away all characters of that have brought fourth shortcomings in our lives

The seventh step as highlighted by Neuman (2017) is for the students to request God to take away the weaknesses they have. The eighth is creating some people they have caused harm to, and have the will to have a mutual relationship with them. The ninth and tenth respectively are making amendments directly to these people wherever they get a chance, unless when the impact would impact them or others negatively and went on to personally take inventory, whenever they are wrong and to lastly admit having done it. To wrap up on the last two steps, they ought to engage in prayer and by meditating to increase how conscious they are with God and how they comprehended him. They hosted prayers towards knowing his will towards us and the might to implement it.

These steps brought spiritual awakening as they tried to spread this message to fellow students and to live lives in these principals. The students have been living a happy life without loneliness and temptation due to these steps. Kumari (2015) said that unity, in this case, is the strength. Students in many cases drop out of flunking in exams after they are left to care for themselves due to pressure and opportunities to drink and take drugs. 20% of college dropout among first years is brought by alcohol and drugs.

Students have found it is easier to stay sober while living in universities that have drug free flats that offer free guidance from staff to students than living alone at apartments outside the school that advocate for liberty in using drugs. Life is made easier because the students around don't take drugs. However, Froeschle (2004) highlights that not all universities can achieve this due to its diversity and goals but can attempt to create this environment for the ones recovering from drug abuse.

Various campuses are inventing support networks towards students’ recovery. However, professional journals are not documenting and publishing these efforts. Lack of documentation has brought risk exclusion from literature aimed at informing research in future and development intervention. Eisenberg (2007) articulates that encouragement of descriptions of programs that are innovative in vital towards serving the upholding of awareness towards issues like encouraging upcoming ways of student support, recovery, and means of creating collaborations and partnerships by joining numerous stakeholders with interests that are similar.

Academic partnerships between practitioners aids in hosting professional communication. Almasdy (1991) asserts that programs aimed at recovery and colleges and university efforts assists relapsing students from doing so and builds a foundation for them in achieving their education-related goals. Universities all over the world and colleges are widely known for parties that involve and drug misuse. However, over the years many students have created a connection of friends that are sober. In these relationships, they share movies, music interests, games and take care of each other. There's a lot of drugs and alcohol at universities. However by the introduction of support programs students have recovered from drugs and alcohol and helped each other in staying sober.

Cite this page