BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM
Since the late 1980s, Business School marketing professor Itamar Simonson has looked for ways to understand how consumers make choices. Much of his work debunks the accepted theory that giving consumers what they want and making a profit are the most basic principles of marketing. Customers may not know what they want, and second-guessing them can be expensive, says the professor who teaches MBA and PhD marketing and consumer decision-making courses. In Simonson’s words, “The benefits and costs of fitting individual customer preference are more complex and less deterministic than has been assumed”.
That’s because “customer preferences are often ill-defined and susceptible to various influences, and in many cases, customers have poor insight into their preferences”. In one of his recent papers, Simonson tackles the issue of one-to-one marketing and mass customization. Supporters of these marketing approaches have suggested that learning what customers want and giving them exactly what they want will create customer loyalty and an insurmountable barrier to competition.
In an example taken to the extreme in the 2002 movie Minority Report, Tom Cruise’s character runs through a shopping mall past talking billboards that recognize him by name and urge him to buy products he had earlier expressed an interest in such as jeans and Ray-Bans, the ultimate in personalized advertising. But Simonson has this to say: The fact that consumer preferences are often fuzzy, unstable, and manipulatable is unlikely to change. So, the effectiveness of methods to give customers exactly what they want has been grossly exaggerated.
In studies, he has learned that even when customers have well-defined preferences and receive offers that fit those preferences; it is far from certain that the response to such offers will consistently be more favourable than those directed at larger market segments.
It’s all psychology. Consumers with well-defined preferences may be sceptical that a marketer could match expectations. Those who don’t know what they want may not ever see the fit with what the seller wants them to buy. So, individualized offers depend on customers preferences & how the offer was extended & and on trust. Effective individual marketing requires not only an understanding of individual preferences and matching offers to those preferences, but also a thorough familiarity with the various factors that impact customer’s responses. This is a tall order, one that some companies have been able to fill, at least to some extent. For example, Amazon keeps track of customer’s purchases and suggests other books they might like. Dell builds computers from mass-made parts to customers’ specifications. But Simonson argues some companies can take the concept too far, like the Custom Foot chain of shoe stores that took detailed measurements and specifications from each customer to design one-of-a-kind shoes. Custom Foot didn’t take into account that some customers were put off by the individualized attention, Simonson says, and felt obligated to buy the shoes because the store went to so much trouble. They often didn’t come back. So knowing only the customer preferences is not enough. It is required to understand other aspects of customer behaviour. Keeping this in mind, present study will find out and analyze consumer behaviour of Nike shoes.
Nike, the number one manufacturer of footwear and apparel, has become a household name on the same level as mogul companies McDonald’s, Coca-Cola and Budweiser. Nike was founded in 1964 by track coach and runner duo Bill Bowerman and Phillip Knight as Blue Ribbons Sports, later becoming Nike, Inc. in 1978. The name Nike was chosen in reference to the Greek Goddess of victory. Nike, the Greek goddess of victory, helped others succeed in times of war. NIKE, the world’s #1 shoemaker, does more dominating than assisting, to capture a hefty share of the athletic shoe market. It designs and sells shoes for a variety of sports, including baseball, cheerleading, golf, volleyball, hiking, tennis, and football. NIKE also sells Cole Haan dress and casual shoes, as well as athletic apparel and equipment. In addition, NIKE operates NIKETOWN shoe and sportswear stores, NIKE factory outlets, and NIKE Women shops.
Nike didn’t run TV ads until 1982. Previously, Nike concentrated on sponsorships and celebrity athletes’ endorsements – including both professional athletes and college teams. The first professional athlete endorser was Ilie Natase – a Romanian tennis player. The first track and field athlete to endorse the brand was Steve Prefontaine. Nike has signed top athletes in the sports of Football, Basketball, Soccer, Baseball, Cycling, Golf, Tennis, Skateboarding, Boxing, Track and Field and Formula 1 Racing. One of Nike’s best PR decisions was signing Michael Jordan as a celebrity endorser in 1984.
Nike’s steady competition in the 1980s was Reebok. To break any similarities they had to Reebok, Nike began promoting its shoes as fashion accessories. Reebok had cornered the younger, aerobics audience, so Nike started concentrating their ads around the person wearing the product rather than the product itself. In the 80s, Nike grew to hold 50% of the market share in the athletic shoe market.
In 1988, Nike employees met with advertising agency Wieden and Kennedy (formed in 1982). In the midst of the meeting, Dan Weiden turned to the Nike employees and said, “You Nike guys, you just do it.” And so the infamous Just Do It tagline was born.
Nike currently enjoys a 47% market share of the domestic footwear industry, with sales of $3.77 billion. NIKE sells its products in more than 180 countries, for over twenty-five years and there are over 500,000 people today directly engaged in the production of their products. They utilize an outsourcing strategy, using only subcontractors throughout the globe. Their majority of their output today is produced in factories in China, Indonesia, and Vietnam, but they also have factories in Italy, the Philippines, Taiwan, and South Korea. These factories are 100% owned by subcontractors, with the majority of their output consisting solely of Nike products. However, Nike does employ teams of four expatriates per each of the big three countries (China, Indonesia, Vietnam), that focus on both quality of product and quality of working conditions, visiting the factories weekly. They also developed their code of conduct in 1992 and have implemented it across the globe, as its goal is to set the standard for subcontractors to follow if they wish to do business with Nike. However, due to a manufacturing network of this magnitude, they have faced numerous violations involving factory conditions and human rights issues, which have been widely publicized.
Nike, Inc. is engaged in the design, development and worldwide marketing of footwear, apparel, equipment and accessory products. Nike’s athletic footwear products are designed for specific athletic use, although some of its products are worn for casual or leisure purposes.
The Company creates designs for men, women and children. Running, basketball, children’s, cross-training and women’s shoes are the Company’s top-selling product categories. Nike also markets shoes designed for outdoor activities, tennis, golf, soccer, baseball, football, bicycling, volleyball, wrestling, cheerleading, aquatic activities, hiking and other athletic and recreational uses. Nike sells active sports apparel that covers most of these categories, athletically inspired lifestyle apparel and others.
Nike’s mission is to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world, and the company says further that “If you have a body, you are an athlete. The firm’s overall vision includes providing a full range of high-quality, performance-oriented and technologically sophisticated athletic shoes and a variety of accessories targeting individuals of all ages, in all market segments.
Nike’s patented Nike Air Max+2009 Light Architecture selectively alters maximum cushioning, maximum comfort & a premium ride. High-end technology combines with streamlined design in the Nike Air Max+ 2009 Running Shoe for a premium ride and fit built for speed. Ideal if you’re a runner with an underpronated to neutral gait, the Air Max+ 2009 boasts maximum comfort and cushioning from heel-strike to toe-off. The full-length articulated Max Air unit provides exceptional cushioning and allows for a smoother, more natural range of motion through every foot strike.
The Nike Air Max line has had a long and impressive history of constantly innovating and providing stylish ultra-functional sneakers in the process. The latest offering in the line is the Air Max+ 2009 Running Shoe, a sleek new model with some very nice touches like Flywire technology and a full 360 Air Max sole unit. The shoe also features a partially transparent upper that reveals the Flywire and a mesh under layer. The fellas will have grey/black/red and Silver/volt/black colour ways to sink their teeth into, while the ladies versions will come in grey/orange and grey/silver/liquid lime.
The State of the art Flywire
An ultra-strong and ultra-light Flywire provides both targeted support and a uniquely dynamic fit.
The Acclaimed Max Air
A full-length articulated Max Air unit provides maximum cushioning to give a smoother ride.
A Cushy Ride
Full-length Cushion combines plush cushioning with springy resilience for both comfort and protection.
Cutting Edge Engineering
Ensure better runs with the engineered heel collar that conforms to the shape of foot for a more comfortable fit and feel
Strategically placed lugs and a waffle-like outsole gives an optimal traction, durability and cushioning.
Durable, Versatile, Revolutionary, Nike Air was the first air technology developed at Nike, and it changed the way of thinking about cushioning: encapsulated air to cushion the foot strike in athletic shoes. It remains the standard in impact protection more than 20 years after its debut.
Nike+ is designed for athletes who like to run with music and who want to measure and monitor their progress toward their goals. To get instant workout feedback, you’ll need Nike+ ready shoes and either a Nike+ SportBand or an iPod® nano and Nike + iPod Sport Kit (which includes a sensor and iPod nano receiver).
When placed under the sockliner of the left Nike+ ready shoe, the sensor measures your pace, distance, time elapsed and calories burned. This information is transmitted wirelessly to the receiver for real-time audio feedback while you listen to your favorite workout music.
Nike is a language of sports, a universally understood lexicon of passion and competition. A lot has happened at Nike in the 30 years since they entered the industry, most of it good, some of it downright embarrassing. But through it all, Nike remain totally focused on creating performance opportunities for everyone who would benefit, and offering empowering messages for everyone who would listen.
What started with a handshake between two running geeks in sleepy Eugene, Oregon, are now the world’s most competitive sports and Fitness Company. The World Headquarters is in Beaverton, Oregon. The Pacific Northwest is Nike’s hometown, but like so many ambitious souls, Nike has expanded their horizons to every corner of the world. Nike employs around 23,000 people, and every one of them is significant to our mission of bringing inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. Along the way Nike joined up with some great partner companies that help extend our reach within and beyond sports.
Cole Haan offers casual luxury footwear and accessories out of New York City and Yarmouth, Maine. Bauer Nike Hockey, based in Montreal, Quebec, is the world’s leading manufacturer of hockey equipment and a wholly owned subsidiary of Nike, Inc. Nike partnered with Hurley International, a premium teen lifestyle brand founded by 20-year industry veteran Bob Hurley based in Costa Mesa, California.
In 2003, Nike completed the acquisition of Converse, the globally recognized footwear brand with nearly a century of sports heritage and home of the perennially popular Chuck Taylor All-Star and Jack Purcell footwear.
In August 2004, Nike created the Exeter Brands Group, a wholly owned subsidiary, dedicated to building athletic footwear and apparel brands for the value retail channel. This portfolio of brands includes the Official Starter Properties LLC and Official Starter LLC which are the sole owners and licensors of the Starter, Team Starter and Asphalt brand names as well as master licensee of the Shaq and Dunkman brands, a line of athletic apparel, footwear and accessory products for the value retail channel.
The Nike family is a fairly vast enterprise. Nike operates on six continents & Nikes suppliers, shippers, retailers and service providers employ close to 1 million people. The diversity inherent in such size is helping Nike evolve its role as a global company. They see a bigger picture today than when they have started, one that includes building sustainable business with sound labour practices. Nike retains the zeal of youth yet act on our responsibilities as a global corporate citizen.
“If you have a body, you are an athlete. And as long as there are athletes, there will be Nike”.
Bovine skin was by far the most preferred leather material, followed by goat/kid/lamb/sheep skin and crocodile skin.
Respondents overwhelmingly preferred the colour black and to a lesser extent, dark brown. For handbags/briefcases, popular colours included light brown, white and red. Consumer Segments with the Biggest Spending Power Male professionals, managers and executives are the segment with the biggest spending power for now and in the coming three years.
The Competitiveness of Hong Kong Brands/ Suppliers of Leather Consumer Goods. Most retailers consider Hong Kong brands to be either very competitive or quite competitive in both high-end and mid-range segments, but less competitive in the low-end segment. The competitiveness of Hong Kong brands mainly rests on their product style/design and quality, with most respondents picking those as the major reasons behind the attractiveness of Hong Kong brands in the high-end and mid-range segments respectively.
Apart from delivering a pair of comfortable sports shoes Nike also provides a number of value-added features with its products. The features that are a part of every Nike sports shoe are as follows.
High Performance Sports Shoes: Nike has patented the “Air” system and has made it into a regular feature in most of its models. Many models feature an air pocket in the shoe that reduces the weight of the shoe and reduces pressure on the heels. The overall design and compactness of the shoes have made it a favourite of many professional athletes around the world.
Comfort: Nike shoes are renowned all over the world for the comfort they provide. Well padded and cushioned, they provide a tremendous level of comfort to the wearer and reduce the strain to his feet while playing.
Lightweight: This attribute is in line with the two described above. A lightweight shoe provides greater mobility and eases the pressure on the feet of the wearer.
Durability: People purchasing a pair of shoes at such a high price often feel that they have made an investment. They would obviously want to see their shoes last a long time. To prove this point we draw the example of the authors of this marketing plan. All of us own a pair of Nike’s and have been wearing them for well over two years – a symbol of the durability of Nike shoes.
Style: Nike’s designs are considered to be the most stylish in the industry and beat all others as far as looks are concerned. Attractively packaged, it is a delight to bring a pair home. Add to this the “Swoosh” – the most recognizable symbol in sports and you have a product that would give the user a definite sense of pride.
Nike shoes also come with a guarantee card that enables the owner to return it in case of manufacturing defects. However, owing to the fact that the company implements strict quality control measures, coming across a defective pair in a store are a rarity. The most recent additions to their line are the Nike 6.0 and Nike SB shoes, designed for skateboarding. Nike has recently introduced cricket shoes, called Air Zoom Yorker, designed to be 30% lighter than their competitors’. Nike positions its products in such a way as to try to appeal to a “youthful….materialistic crowd”. It is positioned as a premium performance brand.
Research comprise defining and redefining problems, formulating hypothesis or suggested solutions, collecting, organizing and evaluating data, making deductions and reaching conclusions and at last carefully testing the conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulating Hypothesis.
In short, the search for Knowledge through Objective and Systematic method of finding solutions to a problem is Research.
· To study the tastes, preferences and buying behaviour of consumer in case of foot wear of Nike.
· To analyze buying behaviour of consumers.
· To recommend strategies to Nike to increase sales.
· SWOT analysis of the product sold.
· Comparative study with the competitors.
TYPE OF RESEARCH:
Descriptive research includes Surveys and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds. The main characteristic of this method is that the researcher has no control over the variables; he can only report what has happened or what is happening.
There are two types of data.
Source of primary data for the present study is collected through questionnaire and answered by consumers of Nike shoes. The secondary data is collected from journals, books and through Internet search.
The data that is collected first hand by someone specifically for the purpose of facilitating the study is known as primary data. So in this research the data is collected from respondents through questionnaire.
For the company information I had used secondary data like brochures, web site of the company etc.
The Method used by me is Survey Method as the research done is Descriptive Research.
Selected instrument for Data Collection for Survey is Questionnaire.
Under this method, list of questions pertaining to the survey are prepared for marketing staff of consumers of Nike shoes. Questionnaire has structured type questions as well as unstructured type questions. Structured objective type questions are prepared for the respondents with fixed response categories. Some of the questions are of multiple-choice type. The questions have more than one alternative.
Questionnaire: – A questionnaire consists of a set of questions presented to respondent for their answers. It can be Closed Ended or Open Ended
Open Ended: – Allows respondents to answer in their own words & are difficult to Interpret and Tabulate.
Close Ended: – Pre-specify all the possible answers & are easy to Interpret and Tabulate.
TYPES OF QUESTION INCLUDED:
Which has only two answers “Yes” or “No”?
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS:
Were respondent is offered more than two choices.
A scale that rates the importance of some attribute.
A scale that rates some attribute from “highly satisfied ” to “highly unsatisfied” and “very inefficient” to “very efficient”.
Who is to be surveyed? The marketing researcher must define the target population that will be sampled.
The sample Unit taken by me is to the General public of different age group, different gender and different profession.
Where the survey should be carried out?
I have covered entire residential area of Dubai city for the survey.
When the survey should be conducted?
I conducted my survey for 8weeks from 10th may to 10th July
The source from which the sample is drawn
How the respondent is chosen?
In the Project sampling is done on basis of Probability sampling. Among the probability sampling design the sampling design chosen is stratified random sampling. Because in this survey I had stratified the sample in different age group, different gender and different profession.
Consumers of shoes, 50 no:
STEPS FOLLOWED IN COMPLETING THE STUDY:
DATA PROCESSING METHODOLOGY
Questionnaires are edited both in the field and later in home. Field editing took place just often the interview. Generally editing is required for open type of questions. Brief notes or symbols are frequently used during the interview to initially record the interviewer’s response since it was not desirable to interrupt the flow with lengthy note taking.
The responses are thoroughly checked at home for incorrect, inconsequential or contradictions categories are developed only often the replies has been reviewed. This review provided a feel for the pattern of answers and thus determine what categories best represent the answers. The collected data are placed in an order. Percentages of respondents answered similarly are calculated and placed in a table. Then this is interpreted. Interpretation changes the new information immerging from the analysis into information that is pertinent or relevant to the study.
CONCLUSION WAS DRAWN BASED ON THE SURVEY FINDINGS:
Finally recommendation was made to improve the sales strategy of Nike shoes to increase the sales volume.
THE BASIS OF SAMPLING:
Consumers of Nike shoes are chosen randomly, so that unbiased, representative sample may be obtained.
The geographical area was very much limited to residential area & so the results are not particularly reflection of the current behaviour.
BIASES AND NON-COOPERATION OF THE RESPONDENTS:
The collected data are placed into an order. Percentages of respondents answered similarly are calculated and placed in a table. Then this is interpreted.
This involved drawing conclusion from the gathered data. Interpretation changes the new information immerging from the analysis into information that is pertinent or relevant to the study.
Due to limited time period and constrained working hours for most of the respondents, the answers at times were vague enough to be ignored. Most of the people take their Nike Shoes in the period preceding March & so the response to initial contacts were not all encouraging and that has been the primary reason in the inability to quantify the results large enough so as to deduce any relevant outcomes.
NIKE INDUSTRIES LTD. – A COMPANY PROFILE
Nike India Ltd (BIL) is India‘s largest footwear company. Nike first established itself in India in 1931 and commenced manufacturing shoes in Batanagar in 1936. The company has its Headquarters in Kolkata and manufactures over 33 million pairs per year in five plants located in Batanagar (West Bengal), Faridabad (Haryana), Bangalore (Karnataka), Patna (Bihar), Hosur (Tamil Nadu). It secures its leather supply from two tanneries in Mokamehghat (Bihar) and Batanagar (West Bengal). It has a distribution network of over 1,500 retail stores and 27 wholesale depots provide excellent access to consumers and wholesale customers throughout India.
As on December 31, 2006, the Canadian parent had a 51 per cent stake while institutional holding was about 13 per cent.
Nike India has said that it’s Faridabad and Mokamehghat units are being taken over by Fashion Shoe Private Ltd and BDCL Enterprises Pvt Ltd, respectively. The company is also enabling the buy back provision in its Articles of association to enable buy back of shares.
The assets and liabilities of both the units will be transferred to these companies and shares will be offered in the agreed ratio to the existing shareholders of Nike India Ltd on a record date, which will be fixed by the Calcutta High Court.
While retail sales have increased both in value and volume, wholesale sales have declined due to restriction of supplies as a means to recover customers outstanding. General recession and sluggish market conditions in the industry also have had a direct impact on lower sales and profitability. Resistance of consumers to price rises in popular volume products as well as discounts to clear slow-moving stocks and under utilization of production capacity adversely affected the operational results. The lockout declared at the Peenya factory on October 1, 2008 due to serious industrial relation problems and non-compliance with the tripartite settlement has been withdrawn. The footwear manufactured in this factory, which was shifted to the company’s other factories and associated manufacturers, will now be gradually produced within the factory.
In Simonson’s words, “The benefits and costs of fitting individual customer preference are more complex and less deterministic than has been assumed”. That’s because customer preferences are often ill-defined and susceptible to various influences, and in many cases, customers have poor insight into their preferences. In one of his recent papers, Simonson tackles the issue of one-to-one marketing and mass customization. Supporters of these marketing approaches have suggested that learning what customers want and giving them exactly what they want will create customer loyalty and an insurmountable barrier to competition.
But Simonson has this to say: The fact that consumer preferences are often fuzzy, unstable, and manipulatable is unlikely to change. So, the effectiveness of methods to give customers exactly what they want has been grossly exaggerated. His take on the long-held assumption that individual marketing will supplant targeted marketing is “not so fast”. In studies, he has learned that even when customers have well-defined preferences and receive offers that fit those preferences; it is far from certain that the response to such offers will consistently be more favourable than those directed at larger market segments.
It’s all psychology. Consumers with well-defined preferences may be sceptical that a marketer could match expectations. Those who don’t know what they want may not ever see the fit with what the seller wants them to buy. So, individualized offers depend on customers’ preferences & how the offer was extended & and on trust. Effective individual marketing requires not only an understanding of individual preferences and matching offers to those preferences, but also a thorough familiarity with the various factors that impact customers’ responses, Simonson writes. This is a tall order, one that some companies have been able to fill, at least to some extent. For example, Amazon keeps track of customers’ purchases and suggests other books they might like. Dell builds computers from mass-made parts to customers’ specifications. But Simonson argues some companies can take the concept too far, like the Custom Foot chain of shoe stores that took detailed measurements and specifications from each customer to design one-of-a-kind shoes. Custom Foot didn’t take into account that some customers were put off by the individualized attention, Simonson says, and felt obligated to buy the shoes because the store went to so much trouble. They often didn’t come back. So knowing only the customer preferences is not enough. It is required to understand other aspects of customer behaviour. Keeping this in mind, present study will find out and analyze consumer behaviour of Nike shoes with reference to ladies segment.
The management says that it is not averse to outsourcing if it worked out cheaper. It is also open to the idea of importing shoes – mostly from China – if it works out cheaper.
Nike and Reebok India Company have announced an agreement to foray into retailing partnership for sale of Reebok and Rockport footwear in Nike outlets.
The partnership entails retailing a range of sports shoes for walking, running, tennis and training for personal fitness and sports.
An attractive valuation compared to its peers is the main trigger for the scrip. Besides, the company’s aggressive focus on retailing and revamping of business (a division into shoes and apparels) is also helping sentiment for the scrip. Plans are afoot to start selling apparel in India made by the joint venture North Star. There’s talk that the company is planning on a voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) to cut costs.
For the third quarter ended 30 September 2007, Nike India reduced its losses to Rs.5.68 crore on a 9.2% increase in net profit to Rs.154.27 crore. Despite reducing its losses for the quarter, Nike India has, over the last few quarters, been continuously recording weak performances as a result of an overall slowdown in the industry due to lower consumer spending. Increasing domestic competition, particularly from the unorganized sector, has also been eroding into the company’s market share.
The company is finding it difficult to maintain its market share in a highly price-sensitive Indian market, despite having strong brand recall. 97% of the company’s revenues are from the domestic market while the remainder is from exports. Nike India is the biggest player in the Indian shoe market.
Nike India’s major problems include its high cost of production and low emphasis on marketing. The company may be able to address the first problem through outsourcing products. Bata’s brand image has been restricted to that of a company that emphasizes on utilitarian products more than trendy ones. Customers feel the company is lacking in innovation. Hence, their preference has shifted to other local brands.
Nike India has a large marketing network with over 1,600 showrooms, 35 wholesale depots and eight retail distribution centres across the country.
Besides, there is a network of 500 exclusive wholesalers servicing 30,000 dealers all over the country. However, in spite of this and the license to sell other brands like Nike, Hush Puppies and Lotto, Nike has not been able to improve sales consistently. The recent rise in sales during the third quarter ended September 2008 can be attributed to the festive season. Recently, it also entered into a retailing tie-up for Lee Cooper shoes.
Nike India has also been trying to focus on aggressive marketing of its product. The company has been going through a period of transition for the past one year. With the expansion of the retail industry in New Delhi and Mumbai, the company has recently decided to shift its marketing operations to Delhi in order to provide value shopping for its customers. However, the manufacturing activity and the registered office will continue at Kolkata.
Nike India has plans to invest in sophisticated machinery to retain its niche place in manufacturing. The company has put a fresh focus to its retail business. The company has decided to cleanse its wholesale operation by building relationships with credit-worthy buyers.
It is to the company’s credit that it has lately overhauled its marketing set-up into a four-tier retail structure that will be stocked with products matching the area’s customer profile. A Nike outlet in an up market place will offer a distinctly different range of footwear from another in the suburbs.
At the top of the four-tier structure will be international stores stocking brands like Nike and Reebok. Next will be city stores, located in up market areas and catering to middle and high-income groups. The company has identified the brands Power, North Star, Bubble gummers, Marie Claire and Hush Puppies for the top end of the market. Third in line will be family stores at commercial locations displaying basic and mid-range footwear. At the bottom will be bazaar stores that will basically aim at driving volume sales at lower price points.
The management of Nike India is taking major steps in terms of improving market penetration, focus on stores configuration, distribution logistics, better industrial relations and overhead rationalization. Launching of new products always remained at the centre stage of the company’s operations.
At the same time, with the opening up of the economy, more and more goods will be imported from China. This may significantly affect Nike India’s prospects unless it manages to wean away customers with a drastic cut in costs. Alternatively, like other Indian manufacturers, even Nike may consider relocating its manufacturing bases in China. However, it is not that easy a task to undertake.
Nike India, the 51% subsidiary of Toronto-based Nike Shoe Organization, remains the biggest player in the Indian shoe market, though its share in footfalls has been decreasing over the years. Now in a determined bid to straddle across all product and price points, Nike India has decided to restructure its 1,300-outlet strong retail business division along specific customer segments into Bazaar, Family, and City and Flagship stores.
Nike India has decided to appoint brand managers for each product group in a newfound aggression to tackle dwindling sales. Each of these managers assisted by a dedicated team would be like a brand champion responsible for procurement, production, advertisement, promotion and re-supply.
Nike India has roped in Ogilvy & Mother for devising its festive season advertising, side-stepping JWT, its incumbent agency. The job involves developing special communication directed towards the festival season shoppers.
Nike India Ltd (NIL) is India’s largest footwear company selling over 60 Million pairs per year in India, USA, UK, Europe, Middle East and Far East. BIL has a market share of 60% in leather products and 70% in canvas shoes.
The footwear industry in India is highly fragmented and dominated by the unorganized sector. The industry size is around Rs.75 Billion and is growing at around 10% annually. It competes with Indian players such as Liberty Shoes, Phoenix International, Mirza Tanners, Tatas, Action Shoes and Lakhani Shoes and global players like Adidas, Reebok and Nike. Accessories and garments contribute footwear sales account for more than 96% of sales while the balance.
The turnover break up is as follows –
Products Volume (%) Value (%)
Rubber and Canvas- 50: 30
Plastic- 21: 9
The Company has a very comprehensive distribution network which comprises its own and franchise stores. It has 1600 showrooms, 35 wholesale depots and 12 distribution centres.
Nike owns brands like Hush Puppies, Signor, Marie Claire Power, Sandak, Hawai, Naughty boy and Ambassador. It also distributes other brands such as Nike and Lotto.
Focus on middle-class and upper class Nike will continue to focus on middle and upper class customers. It is introducing ‘budget stores’ which will help customers to identify with the brand. It is also increasing focus on rural thrust for volume growth in the low-priced footwear segment.
Lifting of quantitative restriction on import of footwear will lead to the market being flooded by imports. Labour issues have always bothered BIL and this resulted in disruption of manufacturing activities on numerous occasions. Competition is hotting up in the domestic market due to popular brands such as Gaitonde, Red Tape, Lotus Bawa and Tatas. These brands are gaining market share especially in the premium segment and in this segment BIL has no significant presence.
Latest Results Sales increased by 5.5% to Rs1.7billion. Profits dropped by 90% to Rs3.8 Million due to lower operating margins and higher depreciation and interest. Depreciation increased by 6.3% to Rs.37 Million while interest cost increased by 9.3% to Rs.23.4 Million.
Operating margins dropped by 3.3% due to increase in input cost. The Peenya plant has not commenced operations despite lifting up of the lock out since July 3, 2007.
NIL’s long-term success is dependent on the how labour issue is tackled and the flexibility, which it can adopt to meet threat of imports and competition from local footwear companies. Long term investors with a two-year investment horizon can accumulate the stock at current levels. It is also increasing focus on rural thrust for volume growth in the low-priced footwear segment.
Lifting of quantitative restriction on import of footwear will lead to the market being flooded by imports. Labour issues have always bothered BIL and this resulted in disruption of manufacturing activities on numerous occasions.
Competition is hotting up in the domestic market due to popular brands such as Gaitonde, Red Tape, Lotus Bawa and Tatas. These brands are gaining market share especially in the premium segment and in this segment BIL has no significant presence.
Sales for 2007 decreased marginally by 0.6% to Rs.1590.7 Million. There was a net loss of Rs.30.2 Million as against a profit of Rs.39.6 Million in the corresponding period of the previous year. The loss is due to lower operating margins and higher interest.
NIL’s long-term success is dependent on the labour issue and the flexibility, which it can adopt to meet threat of imports and competition from local footwear companies. Long term investors with a two-year investment horizon can accumulate the stock at current levels.
The study of consumer behaviour has evolved since the Information Processing Model (Bettman, 1979) assumed that the individual is logical in his/her buying process. This model was criticized because it failed to treat different consumption phenomena motivated by symbolic meanings (Holbrook and Hirschman, 1982). Individuals are not always looking for efficiency and economy, but also for distraction, aesthetic, expression, etc. (Boyd and Levy, 1963). Calling for a broadening of theoretical frameworks of consumer behaviour, many authors pleaded in favour of the study of all consumption forms (Holbrook, 1986), being inspired by European semi logy and American semiotic (Levy, 1959, 1963, 1981; Hirschman, 1980; Kehret-Ward, Johnson and Lou
ie, 1985; Mick, 1986; Holbrook, 1986; O’Shaughnessy and Holbrook, 1988; Nöth, 1988; Stern, 1988; Grafton-Small and Linstead, 1989). These are the study of signs, meanings and production of symbols. Fantasy, emotion and pleasant aspects of consumption were then tackled from an experiential point of view. The Experiential View is a phenomenological perspective that perceives consumption as a primary state of consciousness having a variety of symbolic meanings, responses and hedonist criteria (Holbrook and Hirschman, 1982; Olshavsky and Granbois, 1979). The basis of the traditional Information Processing Model is the optimization of the utility of a product under the basis of a utilitarian evaluation of its tangible characteristics. Nevertheless, it neglects emotional aspects.
On the other hand, the Experiential View leaves out different factors such as economic conditions, expectations, some elements of the marketing mix (price, distribution), perceived risk and conflicts, but mostly the social influence of the consumers’ reference groups (Holbrook and Hirschman, 1982; Business Central Europe, 1994) which is the aim of the Symbolic Interactionism Perspective. Acquisition, possession and consumption are activities taking place in a process of impressions creation or identity management which is, according to Belk (1978), an interactive process concerning both the image of goods consumed and that of the individuals consuming them. The Symbolic Interactionism Perspective deals with the relationship between consumers and the products they consume, and suggests that a significant proportion of consumption behaviours consist of social behaviours, and vice versa (Solomon, 1983). This leads us to consider the importance of socialization processes (family, reference groups) through which individuals learn the meanings of symbols and those of consumption. With the aforementioned meanings being negotiated and built through interactions with others, consumption is not only an individual activity, but also a social process of goods definition (Gallant and Kleinman, 1983).
Since individuals are often motivated to acquire products according to what they mean to them and to members of their social reference groups (Leigh and Gabel, 1992), their behaviour is subject to the pressures of cultural norms and the expectations of socialization institutions rules such as those coming from family and other reference groups (Faber, O’Guinn and McCarthy, 1987; Engel, Blackwell and Miniard, 1993). Thus, Symbolic Interactionism Perspective considers the human spirit as fundamentally social, and dependent on shared symbols. The symbols being generated at a global level (Geertz, 1973; Solomon, 1983; McCracken, 1986, 1988; Leigh and Gabel, 1992), the Symbolic Interactionism Perspective accepts as precept the fact that society and its culture precede every individual action, and that a cultural consensus results from interactions, communication, and negotiation between social actors (Charon, 1989).
If, at a conceptual level, the consumption good becomes an instrument of communication, at an operational level, image variables may be regarded as the intangible attributes of the product that carry cultural and social meanings. According to Erickson, Johansson and Chao (1984), an image variable is defined as “some aspect of the product that is distinct from its physical characteristics but that is nevertheless identified with the product”. The image variables emerge from four cognitive representations individuals have of their environment: the symbolism of advertising, the celebrity endorsement, the brand, and the country of origin of the product.
The made-in is considered by Dichter (1962) as the fifth element of the marketing mix, and is defined as the country where are located the corporate headquarters of the organization doing the marketing of the product or the brand (Johansson, Douglas and Nonaka, 1985). The country of origin carries a rhetoric that influences consumers’ preconceptions towards the products of a country. Its meaning can be conceived as an indication serving as a basis of evaluation (Bilkey and Nes, 1982), when one considers a product as a bundle of information. Consequently, according to Kaynak and Cavusgil (1983), the images of a foreign country that are formed by consumers are made of cognitive, affective and behavioural components. The first one represents the perceived characteristics of the country. The second one concerns the appreciation or not of those characteristics, and the third one corresponds to the actions about the country that the consumer feels are appropriate. A tendency to evaluate positively the local production compared to imported production, and biases in favour of industrialized countries have been found in previous studies (Bilkey and Nes, 1982; Cordell, 1992). This does not mean the consumer will not buy the product, but rather that he is not inclined to do so (Schooler, 1971). “When entering foreign markets, sellers often face quotas, tariffs, and non-tariff barriers. In addition, they may face an intangible barrier in the form of consumer bias on the basis of product origin”.
The informational value of the country of origin was also found to vary according to the level of involvement of the consumer in purchasing the product and the presence of other cues such as brand name, guarantee and price (Ahmed and d’Astous, 1993). In a recently published meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects, Peterson and Jolibert (1995) conclude that the average effect size is lower (0.19) for purchase intention, higher (0.30) for quality/reliability perceptions and context dependent. More specifically, they found that the characteristics of the study influence the relative effect of country-of-origin to a lesser degree for quality/reliability perceptions than for purchase intention. However, the type of respondents (students, consumers or businesspeople) had no influence on quality/reliability perceptions.
Stanford GSB marketing professor Itamar Simonson and Ran Kivetz, an assistant professor at Columbia University, asked a group of 195 Columbia students to do; eat a lot of sushi. Participants were offered a “frequent diner” program that would reward them for their patronage at various university dining locations and given a card that would track their purchases. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups those in the “low” requirement group were told they would have to purchase 12 sandwiches to get two free movie tickets, whereas those in the “high” requirement group were told they would have to purchase 12 sandwiches and 12 orders of sushi to get two free movie tickets. So, the second group had to do much more to receive the same reward. Kivetz and Simonson also asked participants how much they liked sushi relative to the typical student.
The result is Students who liked sushi were much more likely to join the “frequent diner” program that required them to purchase both 12 sandwiches and 12 orders of sushi. It shows a common mistake that consumers make & if they see an offer that seems to fit them better than other consumers, for example, a program that requires sushi-lovers to eat sushi that fit completely colours their assessment of how attractive the offer is, Simonson says. As a result, by creating what appears like personal fit, marketers can attract consumers to frequency programs and many other promotional offers Kivetz and Simonson replicated these findings regarding influences on participation in frequency, or loyalty programs in studies with travellers interviewed at domestic airports. The sushi study is among a number of studies Simonson has been conducting since the late 1980s about how consumers make choices. Much of his work debunks the accepted theory that giving consumers what they want and making a profit are the most basic principles of marketing.
The theme that pervades Simonson’s work is that customers may not know what they want and second-guessing them can be expensive. In his words, the benefits and costs of fitting individual customer preference are more complex and less deterministic than has been assumed. That’s because, Simonson says, customer preferences are often ill-defined and susceptible to various influences, and in many cases, customers have poor insight into their preferences.
In another recent paper, Simonson tackles the issue of one-to-one marketing and mass customization. Supporters of these marketing approaches have suggested that learning what customers want and giving them exactly what they want will create customer loyalty and an insurmountable barrier to competition. In an example taken to the extreme in the 2007 movie Minority Report, Tom Cruise’s character Anderson runs through a shopping mall past talking billboards that recognize him by name and urge him to buy products he has expressed interest in such as jeans and Ray-Bans; the ultimate in personalized advertising. But Simonson has this to say: The fact that consumer preferences are often fuzzy, unstable, and manipulatable is unlikely to change. So, the effectiveness of methods to give customers exactly what they want has been grossly exaggerated. His take on the long-held assumption that individual marketing will supplant targeted marketing is “not so fast”. That’s because consumers are very difficult to figure out, science fiction and technology notwithstanding. Furthermore, even when customers have well-defined preferences and receive offers that fit those preferences, it is far from certain that the response to such offers will consistently be more favourable than those directed at larger market segments.
It’s all psychology. Consumers with well-defined preferences may be sceptical that a marketer could match expectations. Those who don’t know what they want may not ever see the fit with what the seller wants them to buy. So, individualized offers depend on customers’ preferences; how the offer was extended & and on trust. Effective individual marketing requires not only an understanding of individual preferences and matching offers to those preferences, but also a thorough familiarity with the various factors that impact customer’s responses, he writes.
This is a tall order, one that some companies have been able to fill at least to some extent. For example, Amazon keeps track of customers’ purchases and suggests other books they might like. Dell builds computers from mass-made parts to customers’ specifications. But Simonson argues some companies can take the concept too far, like the Custom Foot chain of shoe stores that took detailed measurements and specifications from each customer to design one-of-a-kind shoes. Simonson argues that Custom Foot didn’t take into account that some customers were put off by the individualized attention and felt obligated to buy the shoes because the store went to so much trouble. They often didn’t come back. Indeed, an Internet search produces no Website.
Simonson, who has received many prestigious awards for his research on consumer behaviour and marketing, teaches MBA and Ph.D. marketing and consumer decision-making courses. The loyalty program article is slated for publication in the Journal of Marketing Research this year.
Online customization gives consumers the opportunity to choose characteristics they want in a product when they shop for it online. Many companies are looking at online customization as the future of online business Janis Crow, Kansas State University marketing instructor, researched how people make choices on the Internet. She recently studied consumers in an online environment and their ability to customize several products – pizza, shoes, and electronic devices.
Crow said that her study posed two questions for respondents: first, how difficult is it to customize a product, and secondly, how likely is the person to purchase the product he or she has customized?
All participants in the study chose to customize products. In terms of customers’ likelihood to purchase, a greater number of customers made purchase decisions when there are more options to choose, she said. However, it was slightly more difficult when more features were offered.
Janis Crow created a website where people could customize products to their individual preferences and needs. Crow selected three generic products: pizza, shoes, and a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA). Thirty-one college students took part in the study.
Students could customize the three products, and I provided a drop-down box on the site with attributes to choose from, she explained. Consumers could click on a drop-down box to customize a product they would want to purchase, she said. She found that more people relied on the default choices rather than selecting other choices that were offered. She said, some research suggests that many people do not want to put a lot of effort into purchase decisions. A lot of times, people may not have preferences already in mind, she said. When consumers have the chance to create preferences, the question is whether they rely on previous preferences or if they develop new ones, she said. In the future, Crow says she will be studying strategies that consumers go through during purchase decisions. I will be studying decision processes to develop computer aids that could help the consumer reach their purchase decision, she said.
Although her current project involves analyzing the consumer behaviour of college students in an online environment, in future projects she plans to analyze other demographic groups.” Customization will be a key business opportunity in the future for businesses online or in more typical shopping environments,” Crow said. She hopes her research will help consumers in making purchase decisions and help businesses determine products to offer and how to offer them.
Hong Kong companies, including leather consumer goods suppliers, have shown a growing interest in tapping the mainland consumer market after China’s accession to the World Trade Organization and gradual opening of its domestic market. For Hong Kong companies targeting this vast market, a good understanding of the behaviour of mainland consumers is necessary in order to formulate an effective and suitable market strategy.
In view of this, the HKTDC conducted a survey study in four major mainland cities in February 2007. The study was composed of two interlocking surveys. The first survey (survey on shoppers) successfully interviewed a total of 1,000 shoppers of leather consumer goods in four major cities, namely Beijing, Chengdu, Guangzhou and Shanghai. The second survey (survey on retailers) interviewed managers/officers-in-charge of major department stores in these four cities.
The survey study analyses leather consumer goods in terms of consumer behaviour, the competitiveness of Hong Kong brands and the consumer segments with the greatest biggest spending power. The main survey findings are as follows:
Shopping locations, Department stores were the most preferred type of retailers, followed by outlets in shopping malls and chain stores. Product variety, guaranteed quality, brand choice, price, services and store environment were cited as the major reasons for visiting a leather consumer goods store.
Thirty-eight percent of respondents visited leather consumer goods shops at least once a month.
Shopping during weekends is common. Other popular shopping occasions includes Cultural Festivals, New Year’s Day (January) and Labour Day (1st May) etc.
Promotional activities in shopping malls and department stores are the most popular promotional and sales activities, followed by discount/price reduction, TV commercials, discount coupons, promotional stands, exhibitions, buy-one- (or more) gets-one-free.
On average, respondents owned 4.2 pairs of shoes, 1.2 pieces of wallets, 1.3 pieces of belts and 1.3 pieces of handbags/briefcases. Over the past 12 months, an average respondent’s spending on leather consumer goods was as follows:
When choosing leather consumer goods, product quality stood out as the principal consideration for respondents, followed by product material, craftsmanship, style/design, price and brand.
Most respondents considered brands important.
Nike’s 4Ps comprised of the following approaches to pricing, distribution, advertising and promotion, and customer service:
Pricing: Nike’s pricing is designed to be competitive to the other fashion shoe retailers. The pricing is based on the basis of premium segment as target customers. Nike as a brand commands high premium.
Place: Nike shoes are distributed to Multi Brand store front and the exclusive Nike stores across countries. While this necessitates a second trip for the customer to come and pick up the shoes, it allows Nike to offer a much wider selection than any of the competition.
Promotion: Location, targeted advertising in the newspaper and strategic alliances serves as the foundation of Nike advertising and promotion effort. The athletes and other famous sports personalities are always taken as brand ambassadors. They form the prime building blocks of their portion strategy.
Product: The product range of Nike comprise of shoes, sports wear, watches etc. Its product history began with long distance running shoes in 1963.A wide range of shoes, apparel and equipment. For example:
Nike Oregon Digital Super Watch
Nike Presto Cee Digital Medium Watch
Nike Presto Cee Digital Small Watch
Nike Ron Analog Watch
Nike Triax 10 Regular Watch
Nike is a very competitive organization. Phil Knight (Founder and CEO) is often quoted as saying that ‘Business is war without bullets.’ Nike has a healthy dislike of is competitors. At the Atlanta Olympics, Reebok went to the expense of sponsoring the games. Nike did not. However Nike sponsored the top athletes and gained valuable coverage.
Nike has no factories. It does not tie up cash in buildings and manufacturing workers. This makes a very lean organization. Nike is strong at research and development, as is evidenced by its evolving and innovative product range. They then manufacture wherever they can produce high quality product at the lowest possible price. If prices rise and products can be made more cheaply elsewhere (to the same or better specification) Nike will move production. Nike is a global brand. It is the number one sports brand in the World. Its famous ‘Swoosh’ is instantly recognizable, and Phil Knight even has it tattooed on his ankle.
The organization does have a diversified range of sports products. However, the income of the business is still heavily dependent upon its share of the footwear market. This may leave it vulnerable if for any reason its market share erodes.
The retail sector is very price sensitive. Nike does have its own retailer in Nike Town. However, most of its income is derived from selling into retailers. Retailers tend to offer a very similar experience to the consumer. Can you tell one sports retailer from another? So margins tend to get squeezed as retailers try to pass some of the low price competition pressure onto Nike.
Product development offers Nike many opportunities. The brand is fiercely defended by its owners whom truly believe that Nike is not a fashion brand. However, like it or not, consumers that wear Nike product do not always buy it to participate in sport. Some would argue that in youth culture especially, Nike is a fashion brand. This creates its own opportunities, since product could become unfashionable before it wears out i.e. consumers need to replace shoes. There is also the opportunity to develop products such as sport wear, sunglasses and jewellery. Such high value items do tend to have associated with them, high profits.
The business could also be developed internationally, building upon its strong global brand recognition. There are many markets that have the disposable income to spend on high value sports goods. For example, emerging markets such as China and India have a new richer generation of consumers. There are also global marketing events that can be utilized to support the brand such as the World Cup (soccer) and The Olympics.
Nike is exposed to the international nature of trade. It buys and sells in different currencies and so costs and margins are not stable over long periods of time. Such an exposure could mean that Nike may be manufacturing and/or selling at a loss. This is an issue that faces all global brands.
The market for sports shoes and garments is very competitive. The model developed by Phil Knight in his Stamford Business School days (high value branded product manufactured at a low cost) is now commonly used and to an extent is no longer a basis for sustainable competitive advantage. Competitors are developing alternative brands to take away Nike’s market share.
As discussed above in weaknesses, the retail sector is becoming price competitive. This ultimately means that consumers are shopping around for a better deal. So if one store charges a price for a pair of sports shoes, the consumer could go to the store along the street to compare prices for the exactly the same item, and buy the cheaper of the two. Such consumer price sensitivity is a potential external threat to Nike.
It was observed that the majority of the respondents consist of professional from various fields like engineers, software professionals, working executive etc. who effective form 38% of our database. While 36% were students from various fields. Others constitute designers and athletes etc. the further study is carried on the buying behaviour of the above mentioned categories of consumer, which shows that our consumer is well educated and is very well informed about the product.
In the survey conducted a direct relation between the income level and the spending capacity was observed. Also it was found that students were spending in the range of Rs 1000 – Rs 3000 as compared to the working class professionals who were ready to spend between Rs 3000 – Rs 6000, since they have higher spending power because of higher income levels.
Amongst the student and the professional it was found the consumer buying BEHAVIOR does not change with respect to the seasons and occasion as most of the consumer would like to buy their shoes as and when need arises, whereas the businessman generally do their shoes shopping during travelling or on special occasions.
When asked about reconciling a sports shoes brand about 70% of the respondents were able to recall REEBOK or ADDIDAS were as rest were able to remember NIKE and FILA brands. This was due to the fact that REEBOK has brand ambassador like RAHUL DRAVID and YUVRAJ SINGH.
Among the various factors like social, psychological, personal and cultural factors it was observed that the consumer give more preference to his personal choice and psychological factors like 50% of the people consider comfort and they generally do not consider durability as an important aspect because they believe that it comes along with the brand. Also the social factor like style was second most important factor behind the consumer buying motives.
In response to the question about giving, out of 100 point to the various factors affecting their buying BEHAVIOR between NIKE and OTHER’S following was observed:
a. Style _20__30__
b. Price _10____ 10__
c. Comfort __30 ___30_
d. Brand _10 _20__
e. Durability _30__10_
this further shows that the consumer look for style in the NIKE more in comparison to the other brand hence, gave their 30 points to it whereas 20 in case of other brands it was seen that the comfort remains at equal place even while choosing a competitive brand.
It was observed that consumer is forced by no factors like peer pressure, family and friends and some time people would like to buy a product because it is being endorsed by their favourite celebrity. It was observed that the beside that personal choice of the respondent, the pressure from the friends plays an important buying force for the students, while the peer and college in case of the professional and the least pursuing factor is family which was seen in case of the respondents belonging to age group 35 years and above.
This question was asked to know the market capture by the REEBOK and the time period of association of the customers with REEBOK. It was deduced that more than 75% of the respondents were using the REEBOK shoes and were mainly associated with it for a period of 1 year or more. While the remaining respondents were using either the NIKE or ADDIDAS brand shoes.
Because of the quality product offered by the REEBOK about 60% of the respondents were either very satisfied or satisfied, while 10% did not gave any response as they were not using the REEBOK shoes.
a) Do you ask for a specific brand by name?
90% people say yes to this and the remaining 10% say no.
b) Which brand do you generally use?
People in India prefer Nike the most as we can see that 24% people prefer Nike sportswear then comes Adidas and Reebok.
c) Has any sports shoes ad (seen on TV/in a magazine) made an impact on you?
YES/NO IF YES, THEN WHY
NIKE 43/ 57
ADIDAS 63/ 37
REEBOK 45/ 55
ACTION 30/ 70
Most of the people are influenced with Adidas’s ad, then with Reebok and then Nike. The most un-influential is that of action.
d) What according to you is the relative importance of the following?
V. Imp/Imp/Not so Imp/doesn’t matter
PRICE 50/ 28/ 12/ 10
DURABILITY 55/ 45/ 0/ 0
BRAND IMAGE 40/ 20/ 15/ 15
COMFORTABLE 54/ 36/ 10/ 0
LOOKS 40/ 40/ 15/ 5
By this we infer that the consumer wants the shoe to be durable that is of primary importance for them. Then the price is also very important for them. The shoe should be comfortable. Along with that looks and the brand image is also important.
e) What features of Nike do you like the most?
The most liked feature of Nike is the light weight shoe. Then the enhanced toe support. From here we can infer that most important aspect for the consumers is the comfort they get from the shoes.
f) What range you prefer?
Larger number of people goes in for shoes that come in the range of Rs.1500-3500. A s we know that Nike is a premium brand 27% of the people buy shoes that falls under the range of Rs.3500-5500 and lesser no. of people buy shoes ranging in between 5500 and 7500.
g) How often you buy Nike?
62% of the consumers buy Nike only once a year. Here we notice one thing that some don’t buy Nike.
h) Are you satisfied buying Nike?
The people who buy Nike are fully satisfied buying it, their percentage is 64%. Only 15 % are not satisfied buying it.
i) Do you think Nike serves the purpose of being a good brand, for Sports wear?
56% of the people agree that Nike serves its purpose for being a sport brand. Only 27% people don’t agree with it.
j) Will you prefer Nike launching a new range which can serve the purpose of service class?
67% say yes to the idea of launching a new range for the service class. 36 don’t have any idea of this.
The specific brand objective of Nike India would be to build up its brand reputation, image and equity. A brand is not simply a collection of products and benefits, but also a storehouse of value stemming from awareness, loyalty, and association of quality and brand personality. A brand is a name, term, sign, symbol or design or a combination of them intended to identify the goods or services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate from those of competitors. In essence, a brand identifies the seller or maker. It can convey up to six levels of meaning: Attributes, Benefits, Values, Culture, Personality and User. If a company treats a brand only as a name it misses the point. The branding challenge is to develop a deep set of positive associations for the brand.
Although these six meanings are noticeable in the Nike brand in the west and other parts of the world, they are yet to be cultivated in India. Nike has to ensure that their brand is built up on these pillars in India.
The secondary brand objective of Nike India would be to ensure that they match the market share and sales volumes of its competitors. After all, a company is in business to make profits and stay ahead of its competitors. A company, product or brand may have a very good reputation and image, but if it is not profitable, it does serve its purpose. At the same time sales figures and data can be misleading. Hence market share has also to be paid attention to. Nike despite being one of the most popular brands in the world has not really caught on in India. Yet, there is reason to believe that Bata’s Power and Liberty would be ahead of Nike in terms of popularity. It is also noticed that Nike is at par with Reebok. This again does not reflect too well on the brand, considering that Nike outsells Reebok everywhere else in the world. Hence it is reasonable to state that Nike’s popularity level in India could do with a boost. The best way to achieve this would be some serious brand building. The image of the brand has to be improved and people must be made aware of its presence. Thus, the rationale behind choosing improvement of brand image and reputation as the company’s primary objective is quite clear.
Nike’s distinctive competency lies in the area of marketing, particularity in the area of consumer brand awareness and brand power. On the global scale this key distinctive competency towers over the competitors. As a result, Nike’s market share is number-one in the athletic footwear industry in most places around the world. Catch phrases like, “Just Do It,” and symbols like the Nike “Swoosh,” couple with sports icons to serve as instant reminders of the Nike Empire. It is about time that this competency is leveraged on to India.
Two key attributes of a distinctive competency are its inability to be easily replicated and the value or benefit it offers to consumers. Few companies have such a recognizable image and the resources to promote it. This ultimately translates into added value for consumers. The public benefits from the strength of Nike’s image at the point of purchase. For decades, consumers have come to associate the Nike image with quality products. By associating star athletes and motivational slogans like, “Just Do It,” with marketing campaigns that emphasize fitness, competition, and sportsmanship, consumers identify their purchases with the prospect of achieving greatness. Younger consumers especially benefit from this positive influence.
This image is something that competing companies can not easily duplicate by simply enhancing the physical characteristics of their products.
Nike’s vision is to remain the leader in the industry. The company will continue to produce the quality products that have been provided in the past. Most importantly, Nike will continue to meet the ever-changing needs of the customers, through product innovation. In the past, the company has utilized product differentiation as the main competitive strategy. As Nike’s reputation dictates, it will continue to place emphasis in this area. Nike has built its business on providing products that rise above all others and this has made it the worldwide success that it is today.
Nike is known for its technologically advanced products and is the leader in this area. This allows Nike’s products to stand out from the rest. The company’s focus also allows it to maintain a somewhat narrow niche that enables it to effectively capture the needs and wants of the consumers. Nike will also focus on making a strong effort in price leadership. Nike’s products in the past have been concentrated in the higher end of the pricing category. An entrance will now be made into lower price categories with these quality products. This will enable Nike to capture an even greater hold on market share.
Presently, the only form of customer relationship management activity that Nike has adopted in India is product warranty. Nike shoes come with a one year warranty. If the shoe is found to be defective or wears out within one year due to no fault of the wearer, Nike replaces the product. This is only the first step and more needs to be done in this area.
Being a company that always strives towards excellence, Nike needs to know exactly what its customers think about their products. A good way of assessing this would be to have the customer fill in a form at the point of purchase. The form will ask the customer his / her opinion on the product as well as the showroom. Suggestions and comments would be welcome. However, care must be taken to ensure that these forms are not too cumbersome and do not take up too much of the customer’s time. Surveys have indicated that normally people don’t mind filling in forms as long as they are not too long.
Another good method would be to introduce a system of customer points. Every time a customer makes a purchase, he would earn himself a certain number of points, depending on the price of the product. After he crosses a certain point level, he would be entitled to a gift from the company or choose a product of a certain value from the range. This would be helpful in building customer loyalty and give them an incentive to make repeat purchases. A most valued customer database could be created from her e and various forms of direct marketing could be directed at them. This would help the company to retain its existing customers.
A third way to improve customer relationship would be to issue gift coupons and vouchers. People would have the facility to buy these vouchers and present them to their dear ones. This would be a good way to reach out towards newer customers through existing ones.
To explore the mainland market, Hong Kong companies should position themselves in areas in which they are strong. From the viewpoint of mainland consumers, Hong Kong’s leather consumer goods are considered competitive in the high-end and mid-range. Mainland consumers are brand conscious, and it is vital to promote own brands which have clear image.
This survey also shows that Hong Kong products are preferred for their design/style and quality. Bearing these in mind, Hong Kong companies should never compromise on quality, and they should allocate more resources to product design, selection of material and craftsmanship.
Department stores are the prime sales and marketing channel for leather consumer goods. In addition, store decorations and product displays should be designed to create a strong first impression. Seasonal promotion campaigns, like special discounts and advertisements, could be employed. New lines of collections should be introduced for festivals.
In addition to promotional activities in shopping malls and department stores, discounts and TV commercials are considered effective channels for promotion. It is advisable to pay attention to the affordability of customers in different cities, while setting price points for different product categories. Meanwhile, leather shoes offer better growth potential.
Popular materials used for leather consumer goods include bovine skin, goat/kid/lamb/sheep skin and crocodile skin. Regarding colours, black is by far most sought-after with dark brown in second place.
Due to their growing spending power, the rising middle class should be the target of Hong Kong’s sellers of leather consumer goods. Hong Kong companies should put more emphasis on products for business use. In addition, it is useful to introduce appropriate designs that cater for the tastes of the middles class.
CITY, STATE & ZIP: _________________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: (HOME) ____________________________
DATE OF BIRTH: ________________________________
SEX: MALE___ FEMALE___
White ( ) Black ( )
Asian ( ) Filipino ( )
American ( ) Other ( )
Finance ( ) Sale/ Marketing ( )
Corporate Mngt ( ) Information System ( )
Service sector ( ) Self Employed ( )
Less than AED.5000 ( )
Between AED.5000 – 15000 ( )
Above AED.15000 ( )
Did not finish high school ( )
High school diploma ( )
Graduate degree ( )
Post- Graduate degree ( )
1. Which brand of shoes listed is your favourite (check only one)?
And 1 –
2. When you think about your favourite brand of running shoes, does this brand remind you of a person?
Yes ( )
No ( )
3. How do you find out the latest product in the market?
Magazines (Sports related)
Sporting Goods Store (In-store promotions)
4. I buy my own shoes.
Very frequently –
5. I find buying shoes a pleasurable event.
Very frequently –
6. I buy costly shoes.
Very frequently –
7. For purchasing shoes I can travel long distance.
Very frequently –
8. I buy shoes which are liked by my family.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
9. I buy shoes which are advertised attractively.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
10. I like to buy shoes which are imported &designed in Paris or Italy.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
11. I buy shoes which are advertised and endorsed by celebrity.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
12. I like to buy shoes which are less expensive but very stylish & of latest design.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
13. I like to buy shoes which are not expensive & stylish but comfortable and long lasting.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
14. I like to buy Nike shoes which are less expensive but very stylish & of latest design.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
15. I like to buy Tailor made shoes which are very stylish & of latest design.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
16. I will certainly buy shoes if high quality matching imitation jewelleries & quality scents are given free.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
17. My expectation is fulfilled by my shoe supplier.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
18. Shoe companies should survey customer preferences.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
19. Shoe companies should suggest shoe design using celebrity.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
20. I know exactly what I want in my shoes.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
21. I don’t want to spend too much time on deciding my shoes.
Strongly agree –
Strongly Disagree –
22. Which of the listed is the best form of advertisement?
T.V advertisement –
Stores display –
A professional writer will make a clear, mistake-free paper for you!Get help with your assigment
Please check your inbox
I'm Chatbot Amy :)
I can help you save hours on your homework. Let's start by finding a writer.Find Writer