An Analysis of Biases in Twelve Angry Men, a Play by Reginald Rose

Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, is a story regarding twelve Jurors that have to decide regarding whether the nineteen-year-old boy standing test devoted the murder of his daddy. Each of these Juror's have various expectations, prejudices and sights of the evidence against the kid. If the kid will get the death sentence, their understanding of all of the evidence and votes will certainly affect. This tale highlights the many weaknesses in our justice system. The influence that personal biases/bigotry, personal experiences, an uninterest, andvariable witness testimonies has on the outcome in court is quite uneasy.

Individual predispositions together with acts of prejudice/bigotry are fairly destructive to simply outcomes in cases and also can cause a put up jury. A fantastic example of bigotry in the story is on web page fourteen, when Juror # 10 states, "They get drunk, they all have no look after human life and are terrible ..." This is a wonderful instance of a overgeneralization of a group of people as well as prejudice against the defendant. One more example is when Juror # 10 claims, "Bright! He's a common oblivious slob and also don't even speak excellent English." showing much more generalization against the accused. Oftentimes jurors can have unconscious or conscious prejudices versus an offender's race, sexuality among other things. In the story the offender's race is never pointed out, yet the boy's race might most definitely affect the juror's opinion of him. (At the time that this tale was written in 1954 the Mccarthy witch tests we happening and can've potentially affected Reginald Rose to consist of acts of bigotry as well as prejudice in his tale.).

Juror's very own point of views, biases, lack of ability to accomplish their duties and personal experiences are very significant to their outlook on a case. A Juror's very own clouded reasoning can influence their opinions to suit the outcome of an instance that they are wanting to see. Likewise, the Jurors history or religious beliefs can certainly influence their views of a defendant who has clashing ideas to their very own. Some jurors may also ignore important proof or information to validate their perspectives or prejudices towards an accused or a witness. An example of a juror that doesn't have the capacity to do their obligation in the court is, Juror # 2 that is conveniently guided by the other Jurors viewpoints. If a Juror has actually abused materials and also the accused is on trial for the use of these materials may been seen more favorably to the juror, an example of this is. On the whole, the majority of jurors have unconscious biases or absence of capacity to come to a fair verdict which can definitely negatively affect an instance or trigger a hung jury.

Witnesses can frequently be undependable resources of information or have hidden agendas to give a false testimony. In the story, much of the witnesses testimonies are wondered about by the jurors who have the ability to practically doubt the information provided to them to see if there is reasonable uncertainty. In court, what is stopping somebody from giving a false testimony? Not significantly. False or unethical testaments can definitely shift the instance against either the accused or complainant. Overall, witness testimonies can be fairly deceiving and also harmful to a reasonable result in court.

Juror's personal biases, lack of capacity for their obligation, bigotry and also false testimonies by witnesses are all problems that influence the results in court. Reginald likewise places lots of focus on, affordable question as it operates to safeguard the possibility of sending out an innocent young boy to fatality. On the whole the story of, "Twelve Angry Men reveals the toughness and weak points of our justice system from the enlightened juror # 8 to the bigoted Juror # 10. Finally, our justice system has many flaws that are highlighted in the tale of 12 Angry Men.

Cite this page