A Review of 12 Angry Men, a Movie by Sidney Lumet

The movie "12 Angry Men" entail controversial choice making by the jury. A chamber of the jurors is anticipated to supply judgment. A Puerto Rican boy is brought before the court for eliminating his dad with a switchblade knife. The instance experienced blended responses on whether the young boy was guilty or otherwise guilty. At the starting of the movie, eleven of the jurors believed and also thought the kid murdered his father as well as examined their proof of the trial, while one jury believed the child was blameless (12 Angry Men: 1957). The eleven jurors voted the young boy was guilty, but after a heated dispute, they transferred to a not-guilty decision. The court choices were influenced by argumentation. This paper will certainly examine how argumentation influenced the juror decision making in the "12 Angry Men."

The 12 jurors can not conform. People match one contract when they rely on one meaning of a constant concern. In the "Twelve Angry Men," the jurors are affected by the obscurity of the situation; exactly how the boy killed his father with a switchblade knife, the moment constraints as well as each juror knowledge of the matter at hand. It is shown in the starting of the film where a heated argument is precluded by a preliminary ballot. Just one court voted not guilty for the young boy (Rose, 2016). This ballot was inclined because of a panic of appearing deviant. Undoubtedly, as the jurors cast their first vote, there is hesitancy of those who elected guilty. What we can see right here is that there is weak conviction affected by conformity. Without consistency, disagreements occur as each individual attempt to protect his/her setting. In this instance, the volatile male suggests that the child is, naturally, guilty after the outcome of the votes, while Henry Fonda's insurance claims that "there is always has to be one." These two men portray the power of conformity to persuade the various other jurors that a guilty vote is valid.

Time restrictions influenced the decision making of the juror. Argumentation in the justice system is based on the time constraints. Thus, the viewed force upon a jury and also by a court can influence the jury procedure and also construct argumentation, which influences the decision making. Regarding timeliness of decision is a crucial aspect that affects the "12 Angry Men." The arguments that develop by the court is as a result of time constraints, which is further laid upon their requirements and also desires. Cleary, most of the jurors, in this situation, highlights their work as well as various other facets of the life Jury commitment prevents their life's development, producing an undefined time constraint. For instance, the sickly guy asserts that he has three terminals to participate in, while an additional jurors claim that he have a ticket to a Yankees video game (Rose, 2016). So, every jury placed much pressure on the time restraints. It's no question that time restrictions limited the heated debate concerning the boy's killing and probably why lots of jurors voted guilty.

Augmentation brought about attitude adjustment and persuasion. Persuasion plays an essential duty in the movie the "12 Angry Men." The central course to persuasion is the process through which a private thinks about something and also is impacted by the power of the debate. In the "12 Angry Men," Fonda alters his mind as well as cast his votes as 'not guilty' in a well thoughtful manner. He insists on his factors with facts and also inevitably influences the other jurors. Similarly, the entrepreneur utilizes his tolerant nature to construct a solid case grounded on evidence. He appreciates Fonda test to utilize the central training course to persuasion. The course of persuasion is featured by fabricated triggers surrounding the cases as opposed to the case's practical validity. For example, the sickly male persuades the various other jurors to interpret a perspective grounded on ethnic and racial motivates (Rose, 2016). Due to the fact that he is an African-Americans, he further encourages the jurors to sentence the guy. He has a lack of confidence toward the African-American. The gent jurors that respect the fate of the accused boy are concentrated on justice and are participated in the debate to the central concept. This is revealed through Fonda's personality that share a capability. He relies on justice and also attempts to encourage other jurors that the young boy is innocent. So, the attitude and also the path taken by each juror in the argument influence their choice making concerning the kid's situation.

Group argumentation led the jurors to dedicate a guilty judgment. Drawing from Waller et al. (2013 ), group augmentation results in groupthink where members of the team worth unanimity at the expenditure of logical decision and fall short to insufficient think about choices. When Juror8 tests the conversation and controls it for his purposes, Group thinking is clearly seen in the film. Juror 8 does not count on the young boy's story yet feel that the kid is qualified to sufficient considerations. The other Juror makes a decision with one voice to convince Juror 8 that the young boy is guilty. The debate in the court room comes to be warm as each jury tries to provide his claim utilizing reasonings and evidence. Nevertheless, Juror 8 is not convinced and also denies others juror's remarks. In the end, Juror 8 engages with the various other Juror's in joint problem resolving and also try to develop partnerships (Sunstein, 2007). So, completion result of all the jurors is as a result of participation, which was headed by the juror's debates.

In examining the 12 Angry Men, augmentation is the base for the juror's decision. The debate in the jury space caused the conclusion of the decision. Without the augmentation process, the choice of the jurors would certainly not have been warranted because not sensible, and evidence was present. It is clear that the justice system is marked by the warmed conversation including arguments, persuasion, adjustment of mindset, team thinking and so forth. The end result of a court case is based on all these facets in the distribution of justice. It is no question that argumentation in the 12 Angry Men influenced the decision or guided production of the Jurors.

References

• 12 Angry Men (1957). (N.d.). Retrieved February 06, 2017, from http://www.filmsite.org/twelve.html
• Rose, R. (2016). Twelve angry men. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Group polarization and 12 angry men. Negotiation Journal, 23 (4), 443-447.
• Waller, M. J., Sohrab, G., & Ma, B. W. (2013). Beyond 12 angry men: Thin-slicing film to illustrate group dynamics. Small Group Research, 44 (4), 446-465.

Cite this page