The Civil War as a Struggle for Justice

In view of this, the battle was also heightened by a combination of several sociopolitical circumstances. Secession. The split between the southern states and the northern states became evident when the southern decided to disaffiliate ("Civil war"). However, the president responded that the decision had no logical backing, making it illegal to separate and form the Confederate States of America (Warshauer 46,51). His decision to send troops to counter the planned breakaway triggered the Civil War leading to many casualties and injuries (Bynum 37). The differing perspectives of the southern and northern states were based on the different economic activities and modes of production. It is evident that several states in the north had shifted from plantation to industries implying that most of these people lived in the cities where slavery was no longer important or significant (Bynum 35). On the other hand, the southern states required the slave labor to work on the large plantations and maintain their productions (Gallagher 43).

Therefore, they viewed abolition of slavery as an event that would detriment their well being and contribute to the economic downfall of the nations. The formation of the new state was mainly aimed at protecting the self-interests including cheap labor from slaves and farming activities (Faragher 330). The expansion of the north was also a major critical contributor to the rise of tension that catapulted the war. The industrialization and growth of cities enabled the expansion to the west, creating fear among the southern states. The south thought that the north would gain more support and power because of the size of the territory.

Therefore, they planned resistance to stop the further extension of the zones leading to instances of confrontations that propelled the civil war. The inequity among the states as well as the differing rights led to conflicts. America comprised several states, but the constitution was unclear about the rights and control of resources among the partners. The consideration of the federal government as the supreme body caused discomfort among the states, leading to instances of mistrust as southern states believed that the cooperation denied them their basic powers and rights. In an attempt to gain autonomy, they spurred a revolt to seek complete ownership of the resources and activities within their states (Gallagher 50).

This form of deviation destabilized the unity of America thereby leading to the subsequent encounters and battles that marked the Civil War. The rise of President Abraham Lincoln to the power intimidated the southern states who felt that he would affect their economy by ending slavery. The president campaigned on a platform of promoting ethnic equity and equality in America. A principal itinerary was to advance the Republican Party strong stance against the practice of slavery because it undermined the rights of the people especially the non-whites (Warshauer 101). The southern states perceived his election as a threat to their sustainability because he would stop slave trade meaning that they had to counter rebel (Faragher 330)).

Therefore, the disapproval of his leadership by the states in the south prompted secession and subsequent wars. The Civil War emerged from the inherent instances of ethnic inequality that thrived in the American society. The concepts of peace, social coherence and respect of the rights of every member of society despite the differences are the foundations of a strong and prosperous nation. However, the events leading to the Civil War portrayed that the American society lacked these fundamental features. These were genuine ideas that could be resolved through the use of probable conflict resolution mechanisms such as dialogue to help the citizens embrace diversity. The failure to harmonize the expectations led to consecutive secessions as the southern states believed that the northern counterpart had the ill motive of denying them the opportunity to grow both economically and politically (Reid 43). The war influenced the development of present public institutions and governance structures. The chronology of the civil war in the United States indicates an educative aspect of the human struggles to freedom and equality within societies as well as the role of the federal government in creating unity among people (Gallagher 35).

Slavery and human trafficking were some of the major contributing factors to the escalation of the conflict. Ideally, the aspects of oppression and liberty played vital roles in the rise of the United States as a strong supporter of the human rights. The war was a central event in marking various contents of revolution and social history that created the current United States of America. The victory of the Northern regions claimed the freedom of slaves as most of the federal soldiers targeted the conscience of liberation and freedom of the oppression (Warshauer 140). Nonetheless, the achievements were extremely costly on human lives as more than half a million people lost their lives during this period and many of the community members suffered the aftermath of the wars in the affected regions. The victorious parties presented the nation as unit body positing successive struggle for the liberation of the oppression and the vulnerable groups in the realm. This occurrence was the largest endeavor in the history of the land claiming the highest numbers of casualties as well as rampant displacements in the social organizations (Faragher 339). It began because of a large divisions in the set of leadership and governance in the public prowess (Warshauer 41). As the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln achieved a lot in the struggles for peace and liberation of the various people oppressed in the states (Bynum 20).

The milestones enabled the establishment of institutions of governance and enforcement of the law. In the years preceding the war, one disagreement was that the constitution was unclear about the rights of the states versus the federal government. The resulting confusion offered a platform for the southern states to demand secession because they felt underprivileged in the regime controlled by the federal government. Nonetheless, the war enabled the nation to see sense in having a good constitution that spells out the privileges of the citizens and the states to avoid similar repercussions in the future. Up to now, the United States of America is a global leader in good governance, economic development, and appreciation of the human diversity. ConclusionThe American Civil War was caused by the conflicting sociopolitical and economic differences between the southern states and the northern states. However, it played a critical role in enabling the rise of the United States to become a hub recognition of human rights, respect of law and independent institutions of governance.

The Civil War embodied the struggles for justice and equality between races. Although affected many lives, it resulted in unified front in a world imaged by the diversity of cultural practices and moral virtues. It is clear that the animosity and intriguing differences towards slavery was the sole cause of the conflict. Despite this, it enabled the nation to embrace diversity and institutionalize frameworks of good governance and development.

Cite this page