The population of homeless individuals on the streets of Los Angeles is increasing day byday. Some people in the U.S keep on blaming the state officials while others believe thathomeless people are there by choice. However, there are many initiatives that the governmentand other bodies have put in place to ensure the homeless are sheltered. I believe that all thesethree claims are right. This paper will go through three insights, explaining them in details to findout whether the city is making the right decisions in settling the homeless people.First of all, it is true that the Los Angeles County has come up with a master plan forconstructing houses for the homeless and also finding solutions related to unemployment, drugabuse and psychological health.
Other cities have not used such logical ideas in solving thehomelessness issue, but instead have imposed regulations that prevent these individuals fromliving in the streets. A governmental body known as National Center on Homelessness andPoverty made a report that they carried out a survey. The survey revealed that 75% of the 187cities do not allow people to beg at some designated public areas. 43% have made it law that noone should be found sleeping in their cars and 53% of these cities have prohibited homelesspeople just to relax around (Arapoglou, Vassilis and Kostas 39).
Los Angeles electedpersonalities agreed that enough is enough and decided to come up with a comprehensive idealthat could help resettle the homeless in the streets. The program received county funding, and theofficials housed many people, an act that impressed many. Despite all this, the problem ofhomelessness did not end. The primary reason for such an occurrence is that these countyofficials built expensive houses that homeless people could not afford (Stuart, 32). Governmentalinstitutions and bureaucracies have taken their time to solve the homelessness issue, though it isinevitable. They do that by approving development strategies and accustoming themselves toslow and complicated funding techniques. A recent survey shows that 81% of the totalpopulation of the homeless people was in California when they became homeless, meaning thatonly a few people migrated from other cities to come and live in the streets of L.A. (Baker, Tomand Joshua 40).
The second issue is that some people believe that it is the laxity and carelessness of thegovernment that has led to the increase of homeless people in Los Angeles. This tells us that thecounty of Los Angeles is performing poorly in their quest to help the homeless find reasonableshelter. Building many affordable houses for the homeless and leaving the people who live intents is not solving anything. The government was planning to provide full housing for people,but they failed to understand that these people should live in these houses every time untileveryone else gets housing facility (Arapoglou, Vassilis and Kostas 39). These houses shouldnot be like prisons to the homeless but should provide them with the comfort they deserve. Acrisis house should not be like a permanent warehouse that is used to store human beings. Awelcoming centre or houses built to fit couples, ones designed to house families who have manychildren and for teenagers to sound reasonable. When one walks in the streets of Los Angeles,they see homeless people in every corner, some using makeshift encampments, some sleep inparks while others are living in some people’s homes. Such scenes bring about conversationswithin the neighbourhood with some people shouting, The government has lost theirmandate.(Stuart, 32).
Since some people believe that these people live in the streets by choice,residents blame the county government for failing to come up with punitive regulations to help insolving the menace. The government should restrict sleeping in cars, living around the corners ofLos Angeles, use aggressive ticketing, etc. to discourage homelessness. The government isoperating at deficient speed to urgencies because years have passed since they came up with theidea of settling homeless people. Up to now, they have not finished transforming shelters forthese people living in the streets. The L.A Homeless Services cannot accomplish their setstrategies due to the bureaucracy in those offices (Wolch, Jennifer, Jason and Joshua 230). Whenthere were fire outrages, the county officials make announcements about the shelters they haveset aside for such emergencies. It is sad to see fire victims getting housing assistance from thecounty, but our brothers and sisters who are homeless are still making ends meet in thesedungeons.
Homeless people might be victims of domestic violence, poverty, poor housinginitiatives, etc., so they also need our help. We cannot tolerate such kind of negligence from thegovernment because these people need immediate help, whether we use available facilities liketemples and churches within the locality.Lastly, it might be a myth, but there is some truth in it that those homeless people we seein the streets are there because they choose to do so. It might be politically incorrect, but it istrue. This statement means that the city of L.A has failed to come up with regulations todiscourage homelessness.
Why is it that many cities in the U.S have homeless people, but the highest percentage is in Los Angeles? (Wolch, Jennifer, Jason and Joshua 230).Homeless people in Los Angeles sleep in the cold without a roof to safeguard them, some ofthem sleeping in cars. It is not accidental for these people to live like this. Back in the year 2006,the federal law discouraged the officials of the city of Los Angeles from evicting the homelessfrom the streets. The federal court gave them an alternative to building shelters for these people.Let them eat asphalt. A City official said (Baker, Tom and Joshua 40).It is factual that some homeless people have decided to remain in the streets because they want tostay united with their families. Some also fear losing their property that is in the streets.
It mightbe true that people have chosen Los Angeles because the weather is warm enough to give them afavourable condition, especially at night. It might also be true that most of the homeless peoplewho live in Los Angeles are mentally unstable. Some researchers have claimed that this is amisconception that is politically incorrect and divisive. Recent research only revealed that 28%of these individuals are psychologically disturbed (Arapoglou, Vassilis and Kostas 39).
Therefore, mental illness cannot be ruled out at this juncture. It is a factor that leads tohomelessness in all the 187 cities where the researchers carried out surveys. Research revealsthat there are two kinds of homeless people in the streets of Los Angeles (Arapoglou, Vassilisand Kostas 39). The first group is those who require assistance from the government in buildingthem permanent houses. These people include the ones living with a disability, the mentallychallenged, those who have been homeless for an extended period and those individuals withcriminal records. The other group consists of individuals who should be rehoused due to beingrendered jobless or have been evicted from their houses. The city should find a way of dealingwith such cases urgently.
Ending homelessness is not an easy task, and it requires patience. I believe the countygovernment of Los Angeles has not done enough to reduce the number of homeless people in thestreets. When we raise enough funds, we can build affordable houses to give shelter to thesepeople. The government should provide subsidies, social workers and assistance to the homelessfamilies that are being evicted from the streets. Such initiatives should be done immediatelythese people land in these streets for smooth execution. Permanent houses are better thanencampments since we cannot entirely end homelessness. We need to set our myths aside byidentifying the reality and coming up with solutions.
Did you like this example?
This paper was written and submitted by a fellow student
Our verified experts write your 100% original paper on any topic