Impact of the internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia

Did you like this example?


The Internet

According to Hamil (1997) stated that the efficiency and effectively medium used for accessing, organizing, and communicating information is representing the Internet. The presence on the Internet in the advanced economies is establishing from multinational or domestic whether it’s large or small (Duffy & Dale, 2000).

There are 888 million users of Internet for worldwide in 2004 and it is expected to growth until 1.35 billion by 2007 (eTForecast, 2004 &Internet World Stats, 2005). In the global online population, Asia rank the highest percentage followed by Europe and then North America with Asia is 34, Europe is 29.2 and North America is 24.9 (Internet World Stats, 2005). English is the main medium of instruction for the Internet and the online population is declining for its dominance in the Web while the Chinese and Spanish speaking users are lesser extent but the Japanese users are on the rise (, 2004). The world most populous and developing nations such as China, India, Indonesia, and Brazil has forecasted that there will be a little growth of the internet users (eTForecasts, 2004). Internet use and access is uneven across countries due to global reach as the population of internet users in South Korea is 63.3 per cent, Malaysia is 35.9 per cent, and Thailand is 12.8 per cent. The overall population internet users of these 3 countries just make up only 3.6 per cent of India population (World States, 2005).

Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Impact of the internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia" essay for you

Create order

According to Peterson et al (1997), the accessing to online market surveys, newspapers and journals, country and industry market research, trade lists of suppliers, agents, distributors, and government contacts in a large number of countries are the reasons of the firms’ access to Internet. Internet can play a role as intermediaries between producer and users that mainly in collection, collation, interpretation, and distribution of information (Liang et al, 2004 & Quelch & Klein, 1996). Internet provides a flexible, reliable, and low-cost method if compared to other means of communication such as telephone, fax, and post (Poon & Jevons, 1997).

In the existing marketing activity, Internet is playing a supporting role (Hazel, 1996). The traditional dominance of fixed location stores will be replaced by a new retail format which is provided by Internet (Evans, 1996 & Van Tassel & Weitz, 1997). Internet is the means of communicating information about retail organization, products, and services (Bruno, 1997). In the US, retailer view the Internet as an emergence marketing communication tools that used to attracting new customers, penetrating new markets, promoting company’s brand, and improving customer retention (Ernst & Young, 1997).

Small Business Enterprise (SME) and the Internet

Small business enterprise is independently owned and operated where it is not dominant in its field, and doesn’t engage in new or innovative practices. Neighborhoods grocery stores, fast-food restaurant, hair stylists, dry cleaners, video or record shops, and the veterinarian are an examples of small businesses. Qualitative factors are also important in describing the small businesses. To be classified as ‘small’, a small business must have at least two of the following features that are management is dependent, since the manager usually owns the business; capital is supplied and ownership is held by an individual or a few individuals; the area of operations is primarily local, although the market isn’t necessarily local; the business is small in comparison with larger competitors in the industry (Washington DC: Small Business Administration, 1985).

Perhaps the best definition of small business is the one used by Congress in the Small Business Act of 1953, which states that a small is one that independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field of operation. The act also authorized the Small Business Administration (SBA) to develop more detailed definition that takes into account such criteria as sales volume and the number of employees in the firm. Incorporating these criteria into workable guidelines for use in determining loans, the SBA has established the upper limits for small firms in this manner (Washington DC: Small Business Administration, 1985).

As the global online users growing rapidly, SMEs have discovered unparallel new opportunities in the Internet that are entrepreneurial enough to recognize and take advantage of highly profitable niche markets (Forster, 2000 & Poon & Swatman, 1997). The researchers found that SMEs in the UK has been characterizes as dynamic, enterprising and ambitious as key role in entrepreneurship and innovation by DTI (DTI, 2000). McCalman (1999), states that the entrepreneurial character of the owner, individual managers or operational teams often associated with the fast growing of the new venture and the high growth and high technology firms appear to be more able and more willing to seize the opportunities afforded by the Internet. The Internet has changed the landscape of the firms in the worldwide and globalization is a key driven role for Internet usage by small firms to expand their operations to other nations.

The main strategic factors that associated with successful information, communications, and technology (ICT) is often viewed by the organization learning, entrepreneurship, innovative workplace cultures, and knowledge management enhancement context. The Internet virtually has relevance either directly or indirectly for entrepreneurship management in every aspect of organizational learning (Matlay, 2001 & Leitch & Harrison, 1999).

In the marketing context, Noh and Fitzsimmons (1999) have described “complex, creative, and innovation relationship” is a significant relationship found between Internet usage and the marketing functions where ICT and entrepreneurial activity strategically linked. The ICT opportunities that the marketing function can respond is depend on sustainable competitive advantage of the organizational changes which is the key to organizational survival (Brady et al, 1999 & Komenar, 1997). In order to attract and retain customers, the SMEs have to derive customer service advantages and marketing performance gains by adopted “transformative” use of ICT (Brady et al, 1999). According to Martin and Matlay (2001), the relationship between marketing functions and ICT adoption in SME would make the firms need to make creative and innovative changes in ordeal to deal effectively with actual and perceived ICT related marketing opportunities due to less attention on strategic SME operations and emphasis more on managerial capacity and marketing opportunities. “online marketing” only the step two in a five stages sequential progress to e-commerce and full ICT integration by a company identifies by DTI adoption ladder. Market analysis and related responses or strategies might be seen as sophistication function for e-use in SMEs (Martin & Matlay, 2001). Despite its high level of connectivity and basic e-commerce applications, business appear reluctant to move up the adoption ladder but the DTI adoption ladder model is heavily emphasis on financial based transaction (UK Online, 2000).

In the UK, 80 per cent of the SMEs have accessed to the Internet and another much smaller proportion also able to implement and embed new technologies for strategic purposes based on the figures of Internet adoption (UK Online, 2001). The adoption of ICT in the smaller firms has made the impact on SME profitability largely due to high connectivity according to the number of recent benchmarking surveys (UK Online, 2000). The UK government has initiative to promote the use of ICT and has ambitious target for Internet adoption, some has been already achieved (UK Online, 2000). In 2002, the digital marketplace there was 1.5 million SMEs expected to be ‘wired up’ since 1.7 million businesses already connected and 81 per cent of all firms in one form or another. The national e-economy development had shown the successful outcome of the achievements and impressive of Internet adoption (UK Online, 2000).

Information technology is implemented in SME can described as multidimensional change process (Martinsons & Chong, 1999 & Butter & Fitzgerald, 2001). Information technology is playing an important role for training in SME. According to Coates (2000), information technologies represent the drivers of change of all aspect of life. A new corporate culture and management change will form when the electronic commerce fit into organization operations (Fadden, 2000 & Hard & Knie, 2001). The most important element of implementation of information technology is human resources (Greene et al, 1997). Westhead and Storey (1996) describe that the implementation of information technology can intervene on training aid for change in developing human resources and human capabilities of the organization. Decision making has played a dominant role for owner-manager in SME sector (Jennings & Banfield, 1993 & Jennings & Beaver, 1995). The owner-manager has acted as principal driving force for implementation and adoption of electronic commerce. The role of a person characterized is in conjunction with the nature of managerial activity (Jennings & Beaver, 1995). The owner-manager has total control on training. So, Jennings and Beaver (1995) have stated that the extension of the owner-manager role is the provision of organization training. SMEs are operated under uncertain condition (Nooteboom, 1994 & Storey, 1994 & Acs et al, 1997). Skills and ability of SMEs have change in uncertain environment and SME has adopted (Hendry, 1995 & Acs et al, 1997). Recognition of change has relation with the implementation of new technologies (Martinsons & Chong, 1999 & Coates, 2000 & Buttler & Fitzgerald, 2001).

The Internet adoption in the SME has make SME staff learning through online collaboration. According to Flexwork (2004), a project supported by CEC FP5 IST Programme is a place where EU SME teleworking is gathering at Flexwork. Lawless (2004) stated that both virtual working and face to face contact are still needed as well as those frequent working online also have some face to face contact. The relationship forming through work online has to be considered to maintain well fairly (Walther, 1992). SME has practice team working and it is a most used method currently (Institute of Work Psychology, 1999). Computer World and British Telecom (2003) has stated that beneficiary from the process working online with others is SMEs wish and it must be properly conducted and resourced since there is over 50 per cent of SMEs has no formal IT strategy. ICT based environment is important for future networking platform and it is crucial for SME to cope with it (Ulbrich, 2000) and the need for change in SME has to take consideration on collaboration learning through ICT whether it is formal or informal (Fulantelli & Allegra, 2003 & Williamson et al, 2001). It is an ideal to have online collaborative training or learn cluster (Geer & Au, 2002). Collaboration is required for supply chain and SME is a part of the supply chain especially in motor and technologies industry. The trial has been conducted in Athabasca University in Canada to simulate SME members (Athabasca, 2002). Some EU training organization has proposed online collaborative learning systems using virtual classrooms, network or similar (AutoTrainProject, 2000). The individuals in the same SME or separate SME can form the collaboration learning. The increase used of ICTs especially email for internal communication has become a crucial feature of innovativeness of SMEs as well as collaboration between individuals in same or separate SME (Andrew Pettigrew, 1997). Another increased capacity for innovation in SMEs are external networking (Gray & Allan, 2000).

SMEs and the Internet in Malaysia

Small and Medium Industries Development Corporation (SMIDEC) was established on 2nd May 1996 which is an agency under Ministry of International Trade and Industry to promote and coordinate the development of SMEs in Malaysia through specific programs, provide technical support and management counseling services with the cooperation with other agencies, forge linkage industries between SMEs and large companies or multinational companies, and collaborate with other agencies locally and internationally to develop the SMEs (Small and Medium Industries Development Corporation Malaysia, 2008).

Malaysia adopted a common definition of SMEs to facilitate the identification of SMEs in the various sectors and subsectors. It has facilitated the government to formulate effective development policies, support programs as well as the provision of technical and financial assistance (Small and Medium Industries Development Corporation Malaysia, 2008).

The categories of SMEs in Malaysia consist of manufacturing, manufacturing related services and agro-based industries and another category is services, primary agriculture and information and communication technology (ICT). The enterprise in SMEs in Malaysia varies from micro enterprise, small enterprise, and medium enterprise (Small and Medium Industries Development Corporation Malaysia, 2008).

The Malaysia government has recognized that ICT would serve as a foundation to transform Malaysia from a P-based economy to K-based economy. ICT was emphasized as an enabler mainly in manufacturing sector and National Information and Technology Council (NITC) was established and its primary function is to ensure that ICT well integrated in the socio-economic fabric of the nation (Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation Malaysia, 2007)

In the 9th Malaysia Plan, the strategic plans for Malaysia ICT including the implementation of Digital Content Development, E-Commerce, SSO, Bioinformatics, MyICMS 886 which consist of Content Development, ICT Education Hub, Digital Multimedia Receivers, Communication Devices, Embedded Components and Foreign Ventures. It also includes the launching of MSC Phase II and increasing the number of MSC status companies from 973 to 1236 (Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation Malaysia, 2007).

According to Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation Malaysia facts and figures 2008, the number of main lines subscribers is 588 per 1000 inibitants, number of internet users is 714.3 per 1000 inhibitants, number of broadband subscribers is 96.13 per inhibitants, and number of computer subscribers is 805 per 1000 people in 2007 (Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation Malaysia, 2008).

The government has embarked on a concerted effort to improve the development of the SME sector. The government has integrated 14 ministries and 60 agencies as a model to approaches the SME to source of information of their businesses and stage of development. The Small and Medium Enterprise Development Council endorsed and launched the SMEinfo Portal as an integration of the Internet adoption and SMEs in Malaysia and a mechanism to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of dissemination of information to SMEs. It’s a one stop online information resource SMEs across all sectors of the economy (SMEinfo, 2008).

The SMEinfo Portal is portals that can comprehensive access to information and is a multilingual information portal outreach to wider SMEs as the function as sources of financing and types of financial support by financial institutions, business support programs by ministries and government agencies, training and advisory services, SME Business Adviser Network, managing counseling services, and relevant tools such as financial tools as well as events by ministries and government agencies (SMEinfo, 2008).

The important features of the SMEinfo Portal is the SME Business Directory where SMEs can advertise products and services to large potential customers worldwide, sources of raw materials and relevant services by contracting suppliers, and identify potential customers to venture into new market for their products and services (SMEinfo, 2008).

Problem Statement

According to Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation Malaysia facts and figures 2008, the number of main lines subscribers is 588 per 1000 inibitants, number of internet users is 714.3 per 1000 inhibitants, number of broadband subscribers is 96.13 per inhibitants, and number of computer subscribers is 805 per 1000 people in 2007. In UK, there are 80 per cent of SMEs have adopted Internet and another smaller proportion of small businesses also able to implement and embed new technologies for the strategic purpose. The small businesses in Malaysia have less adoption of Internet in business if compare to other countries such as UK and USA. So, the Internet adoptions in small businesses in Malaysia have another prospective such as some are using for information accessed. The Internet adoption for small businesses in UK and USA has been a long history in the industry. The early adopters for the Internet has used for the range of functions such as marketing and advertising, information gathering, customer support and service and electronic transaction. There are several model to conduct the research on the Internet adoption for small businesses such as Rogers model of perceived attributes of the Internet. The firms has asked to rate their perceptions of Internet use for the business. From the previous research, Rogers, (1995) has listed the perceived attributes of the Internet as a strong influence exert on business use as:

“To what perceptions of innovation attributes for the research contribute to internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia”

Research Objectives

In this changing technology era, the internet has become more important for everyone to access for information, shopping and communications especially in the business use. So, the purpose of the research for the impact of the internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia is:

  1. To investigate the relationship between innovation attributes and the internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia.
  2. To identify the relationship between relative advantage of internet adoption and small businesses in Malaysia.
  3. To identify the relationship between compatibility of internet adoption and small businesses functions in Malaysia.
  4. To identify the relationship between complexity of internet adoption and small businesses in Malaysia.
  5. To identify the relationship between trialability of internet adoption and small businesses in Malaysia.
  6. To identify the relationship between observability of internet adoption and small businesses in Malaysia.

Importance of the Study

The importance of the study of research project titled “The Factors Contribute to Internet Adoption for Small Businesses in Malaysia” can be contributed to the industry, education and society. The study of this research can make an impact on industry, education, and society for different reasons.

The impact of the study of this research on industry is identification of the potential business growth by small businesses in Malaysia with the Internet adoption. Business of the firm can growth by penetrating different market segments and coverage more geographical areas with using Internet as a marketing tool. Another impact of the study is can make the firm adopt process innovation and product innovation to reduce the cost of the production and capture the value of the customers with the quality products. The entrepreneurial opportunity also could discover on the study of this research. Youth could create entrepreneurial opportunity with the Internet adoption for developing own Electronic Business with the low cost, easy, and convenience method. The study of this research could create job opportunity in the industry especially from IT fields and entrepreneurship field.

Besides, the importance of this study also contributes to the education. In education, undergraduates can have an improvement process of acquiring knowledge and information with the Internet adoption on academic. Universities and colleges can provide entrepreneurial skills and knowledge for undergraduates on students’ entrepreneurship development programs, academics and students’ organization on free enterprise. It also could increase the understanding of the technology in terms of information system and web development.

Lastly, the importance of this study also contributes to the society. The study of this research can make an impact on society by reducing the employment rate for the country with the job creation by small businesses. It could increase the quality living of the society with the easy and conveniences services provide by small businesses on the adoption of the Internet. Foreign relation between people and people or government and government can be improving with the development of the Internet on the small businesses. The economies of the country can growth with the expansion and development of small businesses industry and small businesses can penetrate to another countries using Internet as well as increasing exports business of the country.

Organization of Research Project

The organization of the research project titled “The Factors Contribute to Internet Adoption for Small Businesses in Malaysia” overall consist of five chapters with each chapter has different aspects ranging from the different explanation of internet adoption and small businesses from different authors of journals to statistical analysis of the research study.

In the chapter one, the definition and explanation of the internet extracted from different authors quote in different journals. The subtopics consist of the Internet, the SMEs and the Internet, and the SMEs and the Internet in Malaysia.

In the chapter two, the literature review will extracted the quote from different authors in the journals to organize as a study of the internet adoption contribute to the small businesses in Malaysia. The other reviews of the literature are the relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability of the Internet adoption in any fields.

In the chapter three, the methodology of the research will explain the sources of data collection from primary and secondary data. The hypothesis of the study and the procedures for collecting the samples will be explained here.

In the chapter four, the discussions and results will based on the geographic profiles of the small businesses. The chi-square analysis will analyze differentiates of E-Commerce and Small Businesses, differentiates virtual consumer behavior from retail consumer behavior, and the level of understanding of small businesses. The multiple regressions will focus on the entrepreneur’s interest in virtual store strategic management.

Finally, the chapter five will describe the summary and conclusion of the research. The research will recommend the solutions for the problems of the study.

Literature Review

Internet Adoption

Theory of reasoned action (TRA) (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975), technology acceptance model (TAM) (Davis, 1989), and theory of planned behavior (TPB) (Azjen, 1991) reported as a number of studies of IT adoption. Adam et al (1992) stated that the fundamental determinants of acceptance of IT adoption consist of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and it can be widely used in the IT adoption. Perceived usefulness is a major determinant of people’s intention to use computers while perceived ease of use is a significant secondary determinant of people’s intention to use computers by competing two competing models of computer technology usage, TAM and TRA. It can conclude as people’s use of computer technology can be predicted reasonably well from their intentions. The TAM has been selected as a useful basis for starting build a model of adoption of the Internet since TAM is slightly better from an empirical point of view in the comparison of TAM and TPB (Mathieson, 1991). The researchers found that technology acceptance; reasons of using IT and behavior of using IT can derive the definition of the Internet adoption.

Besides, the researchers also found the definition of Internet adoption in other context such as supply chain management. Italian firm has made adoption modalities of IT to integrate into supply chain management to make their business growth. According to Chandrashekar and Schary (1999), in order to fit the customer request, the Internet can act as an enabler in depicting the firms. The efficacy and effectiveness of reaching higher level of performance is the integration and information technology (IT) and it can be regard as the most competitive and imitable weapons (Tan, 2001). Porter (2001) stated that modification of supply chain (SC) relationships, boundaries, and mutual influence is an integral part of the Internet in firm’s strategy.

In the former Central and Eastern European, innovation of technology has been introduced into commercial. Famous researchers such as Rogers have been workout to derive the definition of the Internet adoption from the technology innovativeness context. Everett M. Rogers (1995) was formulated the innovation adoption theory. The innovation adoption theory has been widely used in analyzing the adoption of the Internet (Wolcott et al, 2001), various Internet related applications (Black et al, 2001 & Polatoglu & Ekin, 2001), and software products (Karahanna et al, 1999 & Kautz & Larsen, 2000). Rogers (1995), regards the perceived new unit of adoption of an individual can be defined as an idea, practice, or object in term of innovation. Rogers (1995), also defined the adoption is a process that members of a society can communicated through certain channels over time. Schumpeter (1934, 1939 & 1942) has stated that new application of invention, discovery or new or existing knowledge as an innovation. The innovation also can be defined as the introduction and new development of knowledge derived tools, artifacts, and devices by which people extend and interact with environment (Tornatzky & Fleischer, 1990). The related technologies linked closely and innovation is a cluster of Internet adoption and banking (Rogers, 1995).

The factors influence the Internet adoption because the traditional modes of communication of the firms in the transitional markets of obtaining information on foreign markets, and communicated through business partners, customers, and distributors are costly and time consuming (Nguyen & Nguyen, 2001). According to Rogers (1983), the adoption is an alternative solution where the firm confronted with the problems. The organization’s strategies, policies, and actions as well as beliefs, attitudes, and intentions lead to the adoption of IT (Leonard Barton & Deschamps, 1995). The adoption of IT for organization’s continuously collecting information about target market needs and competitors capabilities and using it to create superior customer value. It is important and valuable for market orientation of an organization (Slater & Narver, 1995: 63). Organization’s innovativeness on IT facilitates the market orientation so that the forming of market orientation firms could gather information on markets and environments (Han et al, 1998 & Jaworski & Kohli, 1993).

Besides, Firm creating and use knowledge influences the organizational factor in learning organization (Sinkula et al, 1997). As learning environment is creates and encourages in learning oriented firms lead to the rise of adoption and implementation of new ideas, process, and products to produce innovative capacity for the firm (Hurley & Hult, 1998). Learning and sharing of knowledge opportunities exist among members of learning oriented firms from individual level to organization level (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995). Slater and Naver (1995), explained that how an organization acquire, process, and use market intelligence is a question to the ability in engagement in adapting the generative learning as a key component of organization learning orientation. The leveraging of superior learning environment is the use of all resources including the behaviors that accompany market orientation (Baker & Sinkula, 1999).

As stated by the above definition of Internet adoption in the supply chain management context, there are many factors contribute to affect the relationship of the Internet adoption. An easy and fast way in the process of acquiring and sharing information and the efficiency and effectiveness of improve performance are linked to the aspect of Internet adoption (Deeter-Schmeltz & Norman-Kennedy,2002 & Ronchi, 2003). The mistakes and time reductions and contribution to the order and stock cuts facilitate the better coordination among players of network (Akkermans et al, 2001). The enhancement of business model development providing innovation opportunities and competitive advantages challenge as well as strategic dimensions of SC design are the impact of Internet adoption (Wouters et al, 1999). The cost reductions of product management as well as cheaper and flexible of data exchange and enhancement of data standardization are the impact of IT adoption mechanism in market environment and organization management (Malone et al, 1987). The adoption of web based tools could enhance the integration such as EDI and as impact of product complexity (Garcia-Dastugue & Lambert, 2003). The standardization and behavioral formalization such as tasks repetitiveness and recognizability was influences by the adoption of ICT (Vacca, 1990 & Lomi, 1991 & Lorenzoni, 1992). The standardization of SC players in coordinating and performing activities are the affects of ICT (Becker, 2004). The change and variability sourcing are the improvisational aspect of routine which is including tacit knowledge, incorporate operative and applicatory capabilities (Pentland, 2003). Colombo et al (1997) stated that the transparency of process is the free information and knowledge sharing while Winter and Taylor (1996) stated that the reduction of middle management direct communication as an enabling of ICT.

On the other hand, technology innovativeness has been adopted in European markets to cater the demand of the consumers in many ways. There are many factors of adoption of technology innovativeness to serve the markets in Central and Eastern European nations. Researchers have investigated and identify the factors of commercialization innovativeness to explain the relationship of Internet adoption contributes to commercial in Ukraine and Austria. According to Dickerson and Gentry (1983), a new innovative service firm must offer increased functional performance than its predecessor can be defined as relative advantage. The primary measurement of relative advantage is assessing an innovation’s superiority in terms of overall convenience (Polatoglu & Ekin, 2001 & Tan & Teo, 2000). The degree to which an innovation is perceived as relatively difficult understands and use is the definition of complexity (Rogers & Shoemaker, 1971). Tornaztky and Klein (1982) stated that the lower rate of adoption means the complex the innovation is. Rogers (1995) defined the compatibility as the degree to which an innovation is perceived as consistent with existing values, past experiences, and the needs of potential adopters. De Ruyter et al (2001) also stated that compatibility is consistent with existing consumer affect, cognition, and behavior. Some researchers also found that consumer perceived risk post as important factors to the ICT adoption (Eastlick & Lotz, 1999 & Hansen, 2005 & Polatoglu &Ekin, 2001 & Tan & Teo, 2000).

Relative Advantage

Rogers (1995) defined relative advantage as the degree to which an innovation is seen as superior to existing practice. In the competition context, there is another definition for seeing innovation as superior to existing practice. According to Day (1984) and Porter (1987), the competitive advantage can be seen as the objective of the strategy and the result of the competitive advantage is superior performance. The derivations of competitive advantage are from numerous resources and strategize the sources of advantage controlling by the firm will create a competitive advantage (Reed & DeFillipi, 1990).

The factors that can contribute to relate advantage to the firms are the ownership based source of advantage, access based source of advantage and proficiency based source of advantage.The ownership and possession of certain valuable assets such as strong market position, unique resource endowment (Barney, 1991), or reputation (Hall, 1992) will make a firm gaining advantage. Porter (1980) describe that there are three sources of competitive advantage arises from ownership based source of advantage, proficiency based source of advantage and access based source of advantage. The firms can gain superior access to inputs and markets with the opportunity and rights (Lieberman & Montgomery, 1988). Conduct and manage the business by superior knowledge, competence, and capabilities with exclusive relationship with suppliers or distribution channels can secure an advantage (Nonaka, 1991 & Prahalad & Hamel, 1999 & Teece et al, 1997). Wind (1997) termed preemption oriented as the firms can create value by exploiting advantages of focal firms with capabilities of eliminating or reducing rival’s option space and reducing, eliminating, and neutralizing other players’ options. A consistent pattern in flow of resources required since the changes of stock level is difficult while the flow is relatively easy to adjust instantaneously (Dierickx & Cool, 1989). The era of people’s attention’s span is getting increasingly shorter and narrower, it is important to have a possession of good reputation (Morris, 1996). Ghemawat (1991) stated that Wal-Mart’s rural town focused strategy helped achieve growth in the 1970s and 1980s and avoid direct competition from rivals such as Kmart and Target. It is an in acquiring valuable assets or positions by sabotage or constraints rival options for gaining advantage.

Superior access to the factor markets such as resource input (Barney, 1986) or product markets such as customers (Porter, 1980) with the possibility of a firm enjoy a competitive advantage is defined by access based source of advantage. Firm’s abilities such as ability to tap resources, skills, knowledge and expertise, market reach as well as power and authority of other business or non business entities to access factor markets and product markets (Ghemawat, 1986 & Bailey, 1997). Knowledge accumulation and dissemination of in advising business firms be a frontier of the competition is caused by an assurance of superior access to talents (O’Shea & Madigan, 1997). Gaining economic fortune and power advantage can access to western technology and world markets (Vogel, 1985). Deny rival access to particular potential valuable resources for gaining advantage (Brandenberg & Nalebuff, 1996 & Wind, 1997). A firm can enjoy competitive advantage by constant learns, accumulates and expand knowledge base or intellectual capital (Stewart, 1997). Sharing other firm’s office automation businesses such as laser with knowledge and capabilities can gain competitive advantage (Prahalad & Hamel, 1990).

Besides, concentric diversifications that develop in the framework can sustain advantage from the factors of internal and external environment. Porter (1987) stated that raising the barrier to prevent imitation by competitors or resist erosion by competitor behavior can achieve sustainable competitive advantage. Competitive advantage can be achieved by building strong and differentiated core business. It couldn’t be achieved and difficult to gain advantage without at least one strong and differentiated core business (Zook & Allen, 2001). Numerous activities in the firm also can be the source of competitive advantage (Reed & DeFillippi, 1990). The company’s ability to consolidate technologies and production skills into competencies that empower businesses to adapt quickly to changing environment in achieving advantage in competition such as Western and Japanese companies converging on similar formidable standard of product cost and quality (Prahalad & Hamel, 1990). Ghemawat (1986) and Barney (1991) stated that independent of its size that access to resources and customers can create advantage on the firms. The activities that a firm fit and reinforce each other which are strategic fit can achieve advantage (Campbell & Goold, 1995 & Porter, 1996). Kanter (1990) argues that sources of human capital also is a factor that can make an organization to achieve advantage such as organizational classes, knowledge management, culture, openness to ideas, leadership culture, and teamwork as the driving forces of human capital factors.

The researchers also found some findings from the pioneer brand advantage in UK. There are two types of brand advantages in UK which are producer based pioneer advantage and consumer based pioneer advantage. Robinson and Farnell (1985) explained that market pioneer usually have higher market share if compare to later entrants because it could derive from direct cost savings, increased marketing mix spend and consumer information advantages. Advantage could be achieved by the length of time in market and time before second entry (Brown & Lambkin, 1994). Product hierarchy and brand extension the market pioneer can be strategize to achieve advantage than later entrants (Kerin et al, 1996). Late entrants can adopt innovative to create sustainable advantage with faster growth and repeat purchase than pioneer which has less innovative (Venkatesh et al, 1998). Consumer learning and formation of preferences are the advantages for the pioneer and the pioneer can become standard by influence the process of how category attributes valued (Carpenter & Nakamoto, 1989). Consumers found to have positive towards and perceptions of pioneer brands because consumer able to recall and retrieve pioneer brands and communicate with pioneer status (Alpert & Kamins, 1995).


Rogers (1995) defined compatibility as the degree to which an innovation is perceived as consistent with the existing socio-cultural values, past experiences, and previously introduced ideas and needs of potential adopters. The adoption behavior affect by the compatibility or congruence (Eastlick, 1996 & Dabholkar, 1992 & Dickerson & Gentry, 1983 & Tornatzky & Klein, 1982 &Turnbull & meenaghan, 1980 & Brandner & Kearl, 1964). Lifestyle also can be related to compatibility (Eastlick, 1996 & Holak, 1998).

Besides that, knowledge on the consumers’ adoption of technological innovativeness affects the relationship. That is knowledge and compatibility. It is an approach for segmenting consumers. Confident (Prasuraman & Colby, 2001), self sufficient, and novices (Mitchell & Dacin, 1996) are not greater than a more general dimension, extensive technical for innovativeness construct since it is likely consumers knowledgeable are more interest in acquiring technology knowledge. Consumer knowledge has been proposed into two elements which are familiarity and expertise. Familiarity is the product related experiences that has been accumulated by the consumer while expertise is ability to perform product related task successfully (Alba & Hutchinson, 1997).Individual learns of an innovation existence and gain some understanding of how it functions means knowledge has occur (Rogers, 1995). Knowledge alone cannot determine the basis for the adoption and knowledge about an innovation is quite different from using it (Rogers, 1995). Technological consumer durable is found has impact on consumer purchase intention which consumers are more concerned with physical space or lifestyle (Holak, 1988). Holak and Lehmann (1990) stated that more specific information about its operating features or benefits related to perceived advantage must be compatible with the new items that consumers are more concerned.

In the ERP adoption, it is a technological approach on the task. The task has compatible on technological approach for the contributing on both task and technology compatibility factors. The Capacity Requirement Planning (CRP) module in Material Requirement Planning (MRP), Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) must be accurate, complete and up-to-date because CRP shows work standard in manufacturing on its context (Possl, 1994). Task and technology can create successful innovation if it is compatible (Cooper & Zmud, 1990). The closed loop MRPII standard system consists of MRPII, Bill of Materials (BOM), and CRP (Scott & Wight, 1981). Customer order and demand forecast are not fully integrated into Master Production Schedule module (Wight, 1981). ERP encompasses MRPII modules with enhanced functionality and a high degree of integration could occur with interoperation of the application module in the ERP context (Gumaer, 1996 & Yusuf & Little, 1998).

An organization also is factors contribute to the relationship with compatibility. Destabilizing and organizational flux influence the employee identity. In the organization context, there has compatibility between the work and the individual. The complete immersion in activity, a clear and compatible set of goals and the requirement of situation specific responses refers to the possibility of synchronized and congruent contents of experience as flow and provides its characters. The flow of experiences produced with the kinds of activities. The involvement of a fine balance between one’s ability to act and the availability of opportunities for action is related to optimal experiences. It is tending to occur when a person’s skills overcome challenge as well as it is manageable (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997). The employer need to consider the interrelatedness of organizational change, professional disengagement, and personal crises is relate to the importance of identity and organization affiliation (Pierce et al, 2001). The emergent dynamics which are including insight and coming to consciousness are related to translation of meaning to appropriate behavior (Hoare, 2002). Shaw et al (1999) stated that the perception of fairness as an indication organizational community members dispositional antecedents to separation and it is suggest to the pay satisfaction in organization. The reciprocal responsive are view in the individual and organization (Dutton et al, 1994). The emergence in organizational change arises from the process continues, trust and commitment since there are ideological and functional differences (Costigen et al, 1998 & Morris & Feldman, 1996).

In the education and training context, competency and reflective practice are fostering a conjoint approach. Competency based practice and reflective practice has compatibility among them as factors contribution to education and training .The achievement by using both competencies based and reflective practice with identify the following characteristics of the profession, the education, and the training (Mayfield, 1985). Pithers (1998) stated that the ability to respond to the problems and it should not be unplanned peripheral outcome of training. He also said in a statement with ‘learner must be taught to reflect, think, and plan as well as to respond routinely’. Generic in character where it is approach to learning is exist altogether different level with computer based training (CBT) as reflective practice cannot be reduced to another competency to be learned (Newman, 1999). According to Smith and Keating (1997), the process time is less importance for CBT and the competency for CBT is a matter of skillfully completing a task to a given standard. The experience of education and training has shown significance in learner’s perspective (Merrian, 1993a).In the learning environment, the educators engage learners in conversation, promote reflection, and accept responsibility for their own learning (Hiemstra, 1993).


Rogers (1995) defined complexity as the degree to which an innovation is perceived as relatively difficult to comprehend and use. It is unlike the other attributes, perception of increased complexity is negatively related to the rate of adoption. Business administration (Stacey et al, 200) and other field of sciences such as philosophy (Maizer, 1997), mathematics (Mandelbrot, 1977), information science (Sivadasan et al, 2002 & Chaitin, 1974), cybernetics (Ashby, 1956), and biology (Richard, 1999 & Holland, 1992) can form the definition of complexity. Senge (1990) and Sterman (2000) explained that complexity consist of detail complexity and dynamic complexity. Number of elements in a system, number of connection between elements, and types of functional relations between elements are the subcomponents of the detail complexity (Milling, 2002). There are two types of complexity which is including external complexity and internal complexity. The external driver forces influence the forces of organization to internally build up complexity and it is the bi-directional influence between the two types of complexity (Bourgeious & Astley, 1979). The level of complexity and how the organization structured can is shape its complexity and the environment (Milling, 1991 & Child, 1992). Variety absorb variety is relate to the concept of the law of requisite variety as introduced by Ashby (1956). The matter of management decision laying the amount of complexity absorb by the company which is the exact borderline between the internal and external complexity (Moldoveanu & Baner, 2004).

Besides, thinking can create cultural problematic in organization. The factors that affect the cultural problematic organization is complexity thinking.According to Genelot (1998), a part of a company form is from the distinction of the individuals and their personalities, accompanied by a conjunction and setting in synergy with these elements from another logic which explained the dialogue principle. People are carrying a culture when they arrive in a company since the culture works them and it is the concept of the principle of recursivity. Larrasquet (1999) explained that advancement made in strategy of an organization doesn’t exist. The principle of complex thinking only can dictate a strategy but cannot dictate a knowledge program (Berkirane, 2003). A guide to uncertainty and adapted to objective instead of universal method. It remains a work for researchers to adopt strategy in the principle of complex thinking (Morin & Le Moigne, 1999).

Organization performance has an effect on the complexity. The factors that contribute to organizational performance are self-organize and co-evolve. Continuously self-organize and co-evolve in all organizations with complex adaptive systems were suggested by complexity theory model (Capra, 1996 & Stacey, 1995 & Wheatley, 1992). Complex adaptive system made up of multiple interacting agents that exhibit complex, adaptive, and emergent behaviors (Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997). The organizations use information collect from the surroundings, themselves, and their own behavior for adapting to and co-evolving with the environments (Kauffman, 1995). The leading to adaptability of complex theory of organizations consist of large number of ties or connections, widely distributed are more capable of variety in their behavior (McDaniel & Walls, 1997 & Stacey, 1995 & Granovetter, 1973). The organizations will miss important data points, will oversimplified their view of what is happening in the environment, and unable to respond to the high level of variations without such variety (Weick, 1979). Organizations hold multiple and sometimes conflict representations of environment variety and retaining in their behavioral repertoire a range of responses which each of which operates at lower level of specificity (Boisot & Child, 1999). The agents figure out themselves on how to organize change in a complex adaptive system which they are self-organize. Self organize refer to the ability to reconfigure connections and activities. The enhancement of the system capacity to self-organize is derived from the connection that helps interpret externalities and enhance successful co-evolutionary (Brown & Eisenhardt, 1997).

The organizational performances also involve the goals of the performance. Two tiered advice process in which experts help decision makers process information and consider multiple alternatives simultaneously which is identified as one way of absorbing complexity (Eisenhardt, 1989). An internal structure that encourages information exchange across internal organization boundaries (Ashmos et al, 1996) and sense making and interpretation (Thomas & McDaniel, 1990) are the other complexity absorption responses. Participants can get identification and motivation and prioritization among alternatives action are the management prescription that advice organization to adopt clear and limited goals (Scott, 1981 & Simon, 1976). Organizations could disarm competitors from embarking on direct assault on any goals by pursuing multiple goals (Barney, 1995 & Hart & Banbury, 1994 & Wernerfelt, 1984).


Rogers (1995) defined trialability as the degree to which an innovation maybe experimented on a limited basis. In the training context, there are some definitions which are consistent with trialability. According to Manpower Service Comission (1981), the training system, training course or program in social as well as financial terms is the total value of the assessment for the training evaluation. Continuous monitoring of the program or of the training function as a whole will be used as general judgmental sense (McDougall, 1990).

In the training context, there is an evaluation for training elements for the factors contributing to trailability on reasons for conducting the training. According to Kearns and Miller (1996), evaluation has become important task for the organization and it has to put more effort on it. The reasons for training evaluation are provides basis for maximizing return on investment, helps the training by the types of return will get from the investment, building credibility and a solid foundation for training and development decisions. Besides, it also could ensures buy in and commitment at all levels, automatically link training and development with strategic and operational business objectives, great reinforcer of learning and further motivate individuals to develop themselves as well as getting the right person to lead for building up the training function. Magdy (1999) stated that most of the organizations in the US based on his research are spending 10 percent of the expenditure to evaluation while 30 percent to the training programs annually. Employment standardized, commercially available and evaluation instruments as conducted by trainers and designers are a result of budgetary and other constraints. It offers little assistance for long term effects and one size fits all as well as not focused (McClelland, 1994).

A systematic process of collecting and analyzing information and about a training program can be used for effectiveness, relevance, and impact of assessing various training components can be evaluate the training (Raab et al, 1991). Training institutions play an important role in evaluating the purpose of maintaining training (Smith & Piper, 1990). Evaluations have come to criticism than action in training (Philips, 1991). Unsystematic and simple means in the practice of evaluation in training is demonstrated (Smith, 1990 & Davidove & Schroeder, 1992 &Shelton & Alliger, 1993 & Shamsudin, 1995). There is a little demand or no demand on the part of the organization to evaluate a training program seriously and there is low need for conducting it (Gutek, 1988). Barron (1996) explained that client’s basic belief is a well trained employee is a productive employee and no demand for evaluation. Knowledge is not fully utilized in program evaluation practice (Chen & Rossi, 1992). Reaction information such as ‘smile sheet’ and ‘happiness sheet’ for evaluation can be obtained through participatory questionnaire at the end of training program (Smith, 1990). The training program has attained the goals by one preferred set of methodological principles and procedures (Greene & McClintok, 1991).

A more systematic on recruitment and selection and longitudinal survey on its use relate with main issues of performance evaluation (Storey, 1995). Performance evaluation has cleaned, accurate, and merit based ratings but has to confront with complex creativity with well meaning appetizer (Ghorpade et al, 1995).Total Quality Management (TQM) and performance evaluation have to be evaluate. Randell (1994) stated that if the performance level has a reason to add performance appraisal as a process of observing current job performance. Scholtes (1993) has pointed out that incompatible has occur between HR performance evaluation and TQM because the fundamental TQM requirement has contradict with the basic elements of performance evaluation. Cardy (1998) assets that judgment of performance are needed if performance contingent decision, ranging from termination to pay increase and promotion to have any sort of rational basis for conducting a comprehensive review pertaining to performance evaluation. The performance evaluation on productivity and quality has some positivef effect due to some form of performance evaluation and evidence is supported (Shadur et al, 1994). Peak organization performance will be achieved if a firm’s HRM activities fit with each other and support other management programs (Baird & Meshoulam, 1988). The higher performance came from the enhancing of employee commitment (Arthur, 1994). The basis for indirectly rejecting employee performance measurement since establish of new philosophy in the principle heart of TQM (Scholtes, 1993). There are four changes keep recurring on Ghorpade et al (1995) discussions are promote worker behavior that compromise quality, create a band of discourage worker who cease trying to excel, rob the workers of their pride in workmanship, and workers are responsible for the errors or faults within the system and it is unfair for the workers.


Rogers (1995) defined observability as the degree to which an innovation of the relativeadvantage is visible to others. Pras and Tarondeau (1979) explained that isolated variable and studies of behavior that clearly identified based on the capability. It is a situation context that they themselves have created and where they are in control of random factors. Experimentalists have lack sufficient accuracy in direct observation where variables overlap and interfere with each other (Chanlat, 1998 & Aktouf, 1987). Investigation of management situation is a sole mean of direct observation (Wacheux, 1998 & Girin, 1990). Daily social interactions can be studies as a pertinence of the method of direct observation (Castel et al, 1990 & Goffman, 1974). Besides, information detailing what people do, skills deficit, and behavioral sequences which observation studies on specific behavior can provide (McKenzie-Mohr, 1999). Evaluating behavioral compliance such as behaviors where people are being asked to learn and maintain new skills can be useful by using observation technique (McKenzie-Mohr & Smith, 1999).

Food safety practice has made evaluation on how the food handlers implement food safety programs. Several factors have caused the observation of the food safety practice. Self-reported practice and knowledge evaluation can be used to the effectiveness of food safety training (Ehiri & Morris, 1966 & Mederious et al, 2001). Recall of campaign messages and result of behavioral changes can be related to self-administered questionnaires (Simmons et al, 2001). Nationwide food safety educational campaign consist of periodic reviewing of epistemological data, implementation of consumer food safety surveys, assessment of industry data and specific market surveys was being used in evaluation technique at United States (Conely, 2002). Consumer oriented and data driven social marketing approach are developed using extensive quantitative and qualitative formative research of the target audience, application of marketing mix and substantial evaluation and re-evaluation of intervention materials on the evaluation of small scale food safety initiative (Redmond & Griffith, 2002).

Commercial food handlers must undertake food safety practice using knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practice in questionnaire examination (Angelillo et al, 2000, 2001 & Clayton et al, 2003 & Maning, 1994 & Walker et al, 2003). In reality, the good hygiene practices are not always translated by food handler’s knowledge of food safety (Howes et al, 1996). Overestimate the frequency when carry out food safety practice often shown by food handler (Howes et al, 1996 & Manning & Snider, 1993 & Oteri & Ekanem, 1989). Assessment of consumers’ implementation of hygiene practices is accurate, reliable method, and without limitations is the factor of observation (Redmond & Griffith, 2003a). Food hygiene practices poorly carried out and the potential for cross-contamination is much greater than epistemological data suggested as indicated by observation of consumers’ food preparation practices (Jay et al, 1999 & Redmond & Griffith, 2003b & Worsfold & Griffith, 1996). Commercial food handlers’ implementation of food safety practices has fewer studies and observation (Manning & Snider, 1993). Checklists Oteri & Ekanem, 1989), standardized inspection, and pro forma to record practices are being monitor in studies (Gillispie et al, 2000 & Kassa et al, 2000 & Morrison et al, 1998).

Research Methodology


In this chapter, the methods are using to test the variables which are conducted such as through primary and secondary data. The report is focus on the factors contribute to Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia. The contents that will cover on this chapter are theoretical frameworks, hypothesis development, data source and collection to gather information, sample selection to involve in the survey or interview. Then, data measurement scale, data analysis and a simple conclusion in this chapter. Both primary data and secondary data were collected in the present study. Secondary information was collected from existing research and literature. Next, a simple conclusion will be developing in the end of this chapter.

Theoretical Framework

Figure 1 shows the theoretical framework of this research. The small businesses have some factors to adopted Internet in Malaysia. The factors are relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability that can contribute for the Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia.

Hypothesis Development

From the discussion of the theoretical framework, five hypotheses are formulated to test the relationship between each of the five independent variables and dependent variables. The five hypotheses guiding this study are as follows:

H1a. A small business has relative advantage is significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H1b A small business has relative advantage is not significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H2a A small business has compatibility is significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H2b A small business has compatibility is not significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H3a A small business has complexity is significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H3b A small business has complexity is not significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H3a A small business has complexity is significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H3b A small business has complexity is not significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H4a A small business has trialability is significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H4b A small business has triability is not significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H5a A small business has observability is significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

H5b A small business has observability is not significantly positively contribute to Internet adoption in Malaysia.

Data Source and Collection

In a research, there are usually two main sources of information and data, which are primary data and secondary data.

Primary Data

The primary data consist of interview or survey and questionnaires.


The most common primary data is survey. Survey is a method used to query someone in order to collect data for the analysis of some aspect of a group or area. Due to the study seeks to collect information about effect of e-service quality toward online purchase, so respondents will being asked whether they had purchase the goods through online, and once confirm, they will been given a set of questionnaire and being asked to participate in the survey. The interview or survey may take 15 to 20 minutes to answer the questions. Survey is a good and fast method to understand respondents respond and feeling toward a product or service. Moreover, the information or responds of the survey will conduct through face to face interview, telephone, or mail.


Questionnaires is a written or printed form used in gathering information on some subject or subjects, consisting of a set of questions to be submitted to one or more persons. The open-ended question which is the respondent reply in his or her own words and closed-ended question which requires the respondent to make a selection from a list of question are using in questionnaire design.

The first part of the questionnaire focused on demographic data, such as age, occupation, gender, income status, race and so on, while the second part required respondents about the introduction of the Internet adoption. The third part will focus on the respond of the respondent toward the factors of adoption of the Internet for small businesses in Malaysia. A questionnaire also is an important method because it is a paper form which conducts a list of question used during survey or interview.

Secondary data.

The secondary data in this study consists of earlier study or journal which was be done by other researchers, industry analyses offered by the media, newspaper articles, books, and relevant materials found both in library and the Internet. These data is mainly used to support the research idea in the literature review. In this research, the journals act as the most important source of secondary data.

Sample Selection

A total of 100 respondent are selected and made to obtain to completed surveys (n=100). The study is about the Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia. So, the respondents who are small business owners are encourage to be selected in this survey. Respondents are ranged from any small business owner from any fields located in Malacca.

Data Measurement Scale

The data measurement scale consists of four basic level of measurement which is nominal level of measurement, ordinal level of measurement, interval level of measurement, and ratio level of measurement. The overall design of the questionnaire is mainly around two type level of measurement, which is nominal and Ordinal. Follow by the research text book, nominal scale is a scale to identify objects, individuals, events or group, determinate of equality or inequality and are most commonly using in the research. Nominal scales are used in the questions which are in the demographic information section such as female or male, buyer or non buyer. Meanwhile, follow by the research text book, ordinal scales is in addition to identification which provides information about the relative amount of some characteristic possessed by an event or object, and to determine of the greater or lesser. For each question, respondents were asked to circle the response which best described their level of agreement with the statements. Besides that, All items were measured using a seven-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 1 =strongly disagree, 2= disagree, 3= agree to 4 = strongly agree) (Pritchard et al, 2000).

Research Variables

Internet Adoption

Rogers (1995) explained that the components of forming the attributes in the Internet adoption are perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the Internet.

Relative Advantage

Rogers (1995) explained that the components of forming the attributes in the relative advantage are derive satisfaction from its use, enhance corporate image, establish stronger links with clients or business partners, develop new business opportunities. Besides, reduce the costs of information marketing and advertising, customer service and support, information gathering and telecommuting, increase sales as well as enlarge market share.


Rogers (1995) explained that the components of forming the attributes in compatibility are consistency with the values, beliefs, and business needs of the company, sufficient support for the Internet from the top management, and there is no or only minimal resistance to change from the staff.


Rogers (1995) explained that the components of forming the attributes in complexity are problems with locating desired information, rapid changes and technological advances, technical constraints, and complexity of technology, and the skills and training required.


Rogers (1995) explained that the components of forming the attributes in trialability are there are no fear of cost overrun or time slippage when experimenting, face no financial constraints in experimenting, and experiment with the Internet before committing more resources to it.


Rogers (1995) explained that the components of forming the attributes in observability are believe that the use of the Internet will be highly valued, think that most firms will adopt the use of the Internet, do not readily conceive of limitations to the use of the Internet for business. On the other hand, observe the success of similar initiatives by other companies and find that the use of Internet will become essential.

Data Analysis

The list of data is test valid and reliability in the core choice model in several different ways. The data are tested for the relative advantages, compatibility, and complexity and so on.

The hypothesized relationships were tested using the multiple regression analysis of SPSS 16.0 for Windows. The SPSS 16.0 is a system which includes t-test, one-way ANOVA, cross tabulations, chi-square, and correlation analysis was conducted to identify differences among user groups. Besides that, SPSS can generate useful tables and graphs such as line charts, pie charts, bar charts and so on for better decision-making. With SPSS, it is easy to understand the variable among the effect of e-service quality. The system will changed all reported independent and dependent variable to numeric codes.

Cross Tabulation

Cross Tabulation represent a simple-to-understand, yet powerful, analytical tool. For example the cross tabulation may determine the percentage of small business owner in Malaysia will adopt the Internet.

One Way ANOVAs

From the research text book, one way ANOVAs is a statistical test that is used to test the null hypothesis of equality of two or more population means. If the rest shows significance, the null hypothesis is rejected and conclusion can be made that there is a difference between the population means. In this study, for example, relative advantage and compatibility affect the relationship in the Internet adoption is tested to examine the difference of relative advantage is the main effect of the Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia. If significant value (at confidence level of 95%) is less than 0.05, it shows that the relative advantage is the significantly effect the adoption of Internet for small businesses in Malaysia.


This chapter discuss the method was used to determined the list of variable which is the most effective in effect of the Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia. The primary data such as survey and questionnaire and secondary data just as journal are using to test the list of variable. Besides that, the system which called SPSS 16.0 which is a system which include a list of testing tools such as correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis are used in distribute the questionnaire and can provide a clearly map for more understanding and support the topic which is the factors contribute to Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia.

Data Analysis

In this chapter, it covers respondents’ profile, reliability test, correlation testing, hypotheses testing and the discussion of the results. Respondents’ profile analyze the response rate, respondents’ demographic as well as their online profile. Reliability test is conducted to test the validity and the consistent of the results. Moreover, the correlation testing determines the degree of the relationship between the dependent variables and independent variables. Multiple regression analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses of this study. Lastly, the results of the study will be discussed.

Respondents’ Profile

Response Rate

Data for this study was collected by the means of questionnaires conducted in Malaysia 2009. A total of 150 questionnaire forms were delivered to respondents. Of these 150 samples, 100 valid samples were obtains since 50 samples were eliminated due to missing data. Thus, these 100 samples giving a response rate of 67 percent. Questionnaires were filled in by small businesses owner in state of Malacca.

Respondents’ Demographics

As illustrated in Figure 1, the total sample for the survey consisted of 100 respondents, 12 of whom represented the CEO, 21 were Manager and 67 were Self-employed.

As illustrated in Figure 2, the total sample for the survey consisted of 100 respondents, 12 of whom represented Manufacturing, 17 represented Manufacturing related services, 10 represented Agro-based industries, and 61 represented Services.

As illustrated in Figure 3, the total sample for the survey consisted of 100 respondents, 59 represented Melaka Tengah, 22 were from Alor Gajah, and 19 were from Jasin.

As illustrated in Figure 4, the total sample for the survey consisted of 100 respondents, the number of employee in the small business enterprise which consist of less than 5 employee represented is 35, between 5 to 10 represented is 34, between 11 to 15 represented is 14, and more than 15 represented is 17.

Respondents’ Online Profile

In the results, 28 percent of respondents have internet operations in their small business enterprise whereas 78% do not have internet operations in their small business enterprise.

Reliability Analysis

The validation measuring process started with an initial exploratory analysis of reliability (((Anderson and Gerbing, 1988). The research used Cronbach alpha to investigate the reliability of each variables (Table 2) which access the initial reliability of the scales considering the minimum value of 0.7 (Cronbach, 1970).

From the reliability test, the initial result shows that all variables are reliable and the values are as follows: Internet Adoption (0.913), Relative Advantage (0.942), Compatibility (0.953), Trialability (0.978), Observability (0.941), and Complexity (0.892)

Correlations Analysis

In this study, the normality test indicates the result is normally distributed. Thus, to explore the relationship between factors contribution to internet adoption as well as the relationship between internet adoption and relative advantage, we calculated the Pearson correlations coefficient in order to measure the linear association between variables (see Table 3). Based on the correlation analysis, there is no multicollinearity problem among independent variables.

According to Burns and Bush (2003), it proposed the rules of thumb about correlation coefficient size. That is, correlation coefficient that fall between +1.00 and +0.81 or between -1.00 and -0.81 are generally considered to be strong association. Those correlation that fall between +0.80 and +0.61 or -0.80 and -0.61 generally indicate a moderate association. Those fall between +0.60 and +0.41 or -0.60 and -0.41 are typically considered as weak association. Subsequently, those fall between the range of +0.21 and +0.40 or -0.21 and -0.40 indicating a very weak association between the variables. Finally, any correlation that is equal or less that ± 0.20 indicates rarely identifies a meaningful association between variables.

Among the factors contribute to internet adoption; result reveals that the relationship between relative advantage and internet adoption is significant positive (significant at 0.000, p < 0.01), the relationship between compatibility and internet adoption is significant positive (significant at 0.000, p < 0.01), the relationship between trialability and the internet adoption is significant positive (significant at 0.000, p < 0.01), the relationship between observability and internet adoption is significant positive (significant at 0.000, p < 0.01), and the relationship between complexity and internet adoption is significant positive (significant at 0.000, p < 0.05). The results indicated that the factors contribute to internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia are high and relationships among the variables are strong.

Multiple Regressions

According to Churchill (1995), a regression model is considered to be valid when the predicted variables are not correlated among themselves (i.e. multicollinearlity) and the linearity of the relationship between dependent and independent variables. The main purpose of hypotheses testing is to test the four hypotheses that were developed earlier in the research methodology section.

The results of the multiple regression analysis shown in Table 5 indicate that the coefficient of determination (R square) of this model is 0.786, indicating a 78.6 percent of the factors contribute to internet adoption is explained by relative advantage, compatibility, trialability, observability, and complexity. In other words, these five independents variables predict a strong change in perceived value. Further, the F value of this model is 68.917.

From the results, complexity is the most influential determinants in the factors contribute to Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia. It has high positive impacts on Internet adoption (Beta=0.454) at 0.000 significant level. As such, hypothesis 5 is accepted. However, relative advantage and compatibility do not have significant influence on internet adoption (significant level=0.370 and 0.158). It is concluded that relative advantage and compatibility are not determinants of Internet adoption and thus hypotheses 1 and 2 are rejected.

It is observed from Table 6 that factors contributes significantly to Internet adoption (F=68.917, p-value=0.000) and predicts 78.6 percent of the variations in Internet adoption. Furthermore, the adjusted R square value is 0.774, indicating that 77.4 percent of the variation in the amount of small business owners is willing to adopt Internet. Further details show that the perceived value has significant influence on Internet adoption at 0.000 significant levels. Thus, hypothesis 4 is accepted.


Conclusions and Recommendations


As conclusion, the results show that small businesses in Malaysia are dominated by self-employed follow by manager and CEO. Most small businesses in Malaysia is dominated by self-employed is due to family owned business culture in Malaysia especially for Chinese. Some others are operated by hire CEO and manager.

Services industry dominates the small businesses in Malaysia follow by manufacturing related services, manufacturing, and agro-based industries which most cover the areas in Melaka Tengah follow by Alor Gajah and Jasin. Melaka Tengah is a most populated areas in state of Melaka such as Melaka Raya is a business hub while Batu Berendam is light and heavy industries zone. Small businesses in Malaysia are dominated by less than five employees in their number of workforce and others are following by 5 to 10 employees, 11 to 15 employees and lastly is more than 15 employees. Finally, small businesses in Malaysia that own Internet operation is accounted for 28% while do not own Internet operation accounted for 72%.

In the reliability analysis, the results show that all variables are reliable which the value shown as follows: Internet Adoption (0.913), Relative Advantage (0.942), Compatibility (0.953), Trialability (0.978), Observability (0.941), and Complexity (0.892). The factors contribute to the Internet adoption for small businesses in Malaysia has significantly positive where complexity has strongly influence the relationship with Internet adoption while relative advantage and compatibility has no significantly influence the relationship with Internet adoption.

Finally, the hypothesis results show that relative advantage and compatibility are rejected while complexity, trialability, and observability are accepted.

Implication of the Research

The implication of this research could encourage the small businesses in Malaysia to adopt Internet operation to create competitive for their efficiency and effectiveness of the operation of their businesses. It also encourage entrepreneur to invest in technology innovativeness especially in information and communication technologies to raise the quality of the operations for making new products and services.

Government can encourage and promote entrepreneurship and ICT initiative so that citizen could compete in the global economy and capture competitive advantage by exploiting knowledge and innovation. It could serve as a platform for knowledge based economy to increase the capacity and productivity of the workforce by emphasizing the importance of knowledge and innovation.

Limitations and Significant for Future Research

The limitations of the research are the area coverage for doing survey for small businesses is too big where it covers Melaka Tengah, Alor Gajah, and Jasin. Besides, there are many illiterate small business owners especially in Alor Gajah and Jasin. There are many small businesses owner are unwilling to do the research due to curiosity and most of them don’t have any knowledge about ICT especially for rural small businesses owner.

The future of this research could serve as a foundation for e-commerce and e-business in Malaysia since the changing of information and communication technologies has make the world becoming borderless for trading and globalization effect. Moreover, it could serve as a platform for micro enterprise in Malaysia to adoption Internet operation in the future to exploit new business opportunities and serve the new market.


  • Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. (1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 227-47.
  • Aktouf, O. (1987), Methodologies des Sciences Sociales et Approache Qualitative des Organisations, Presses de l’Universite du Quebec, Quebec.
  • Athabasca (2002), available at: and aucimwebsite.nsf/AllDoc/A5378FB0F722A16287256BDD00638E4D/OpenDocument (accessed 3 March 2005).
  • Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 179-211.
  • Akkermans, H.A., Bogerd, P., Yucesan, E. and van Wassenhove, L.N. (2001), “The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi Study”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 146 No. 2, pp. 284-301.
  • Alpert, F.H and Kamins, M.A (1995), “An empirical investigation of consumer memory, attitude, and perceptions toward pioneer and follow brands”, Journal of Marketing, October, Vol. 59, pp. 34-45.
  • Alba, J.W. and Hutchison, J.W. (1987), “Dimensions of consumer expertise”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, pp. 41-445.
  • Anderson, J. and Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-23.
  • Angelillo, I.F., Viggiani, N.M.A., Rizzo, L. and Bianco, A. (2000), “Food handlers and foodborne diseases: knowledge, attitudes and reported behavior in Italy”, Journal of Food Protection, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 381-5.
  • Angelillo, I.F., Viggiani, N., Greco, R.M. and Rito, D. (2001), “HAACP and food hygiene in hospitals: knowledge, attitudes and practices of food-service staff in Calabria Italy”, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 363-9.
  • Ashmos, D.P. and McDaniel, R.R. (1996), “The role of external critical task specialists in strategic decision making”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 26 No. 4.
  • Ashmos, D.P., Duchon, D., Hauge, F. and McDaniel, R.R. (1996), “Internal complexity and environmental sensitivity in hospitals”, Hospital and Health Services Administration, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 535-53.
  • Ashby, W.R. (1956), An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Arthur, J.B. (1994), “Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 670-87.
  • AutoTrain Project (2000), paper presented at the Distance Learning for the Automotive Industry Seminar November, available at:
  • Acs, Z.J Morck, R., Shaver, J.M. and Yeung, B. (1997), “The internationalization of small and medium sized enterprises: a policy perspective”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 7-20.
  • Bruno, L. (1997), “Working the web”, Data Communications, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 7-9.
  • Butler, T. and Fitzgerald, B. (2001), “The relationship between user participation and the management of change surrounding the development of development of information system: a European perspective”, Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 12-35.
  • Bailey, E.E. (1997), “Integrating policy trends into dynamic advantage”, in Day, G.S. and Reibstein, D.J. (Eds), Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  • Baker, W.E. and Sinkula, J.M. (1999), “The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning organization on organizational performance”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 411-27.
  • Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99-120.
  • Barney, J. (1995), “Looking inside for competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 49-61.
  • Barron, T. (1996), “A new wave in training funding”, Training & Development Journal, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 28-32.
  • Becker, M.C. (2004), “Organizational routines: a review of the literature”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 643-77.
  • Brandenberg, A. and Nalebuff, B. (1996) Competition, Currency/Doubleday, New York, NY.
  • Brown, C.L. and Lambkin, M. (1994), “Investigating the relationship between time in market and pioneering advantage”, Management Science, October, Vol. 40 No. 10, pp. 1361-9.
  • Brady, M., Saren, M. and Tzokas, N. (1999), “The impact of IT on marketing: an evaluation”, Mangement Decision, Vol. 37 No. 10, pp. 758-66.
  • Brandner, L. Kearl, B. (1964), “Evaluation for congruence as a factor in adoption rate of innovations”, Rural Sociology, Vol. 29, pp. 288-303.
  • Benkirane, R. (2003), La Complexite, Vertigas et Promesses, 18 Histoires des Sciences, Ed. Le Pommier.
  • Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997), “The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, pp. 1-34.
  • Boisot, M. and Child, J. (1999), “Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: the case of China”, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 237-52.
  • Bourgeois, L.J. and Astley, W.G. (1979), “A strategic model of organizational conduct and performance”, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 40-66.
  • Burns, A.C. and Bush, R.F. (2003). Marketing research: Online research application (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Baird, L. and Meshoulam, I. (1988), “Managing two fits of strategic human resource management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 116-28.
  • Campbell, A. and Goold, M. (1995), “Corporate Strategy: the quest for parenting advantage”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 120-33.
  • Capra, F. (1996), The Web of Life, Doubleday, New York, NY.
  • Cardy, R.L. (1998), “Performance appraisal in a quality context: a new look at an old problem”, in Smither, J.W. (Ed)., Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
  • Carpenter, G.S. and Nakamoto, K. (1989), “Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage”, Journal of Marketing Research, August, Vol. 27, pp. 285-98.
  • Castel, R. et al (1990), Le Parler Frais d’Erving Goffman, Minuit, Paris.
  • Chaitin, G.J. (1974), “Information-theoretic computational complexity”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 10-15.
  • Chanlat, J.F. (1998), Sciences Sociales et Management, Plaidoyer pour une Anthro pologie Generale, Presses de l’Universite de Laval, Quebec, Canada.
  • Chen, H.T. and Rossi, P.H. (Eds) (19921), Using Theory to Improve Program and Policy Evaluations, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
  • Child, J. (1972), “Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice”, Sociology, Vol. 6, pp. 1-22.
  • Churchill, G. (1995). Marketing research: Methodological foundation, Dryden press, Orlando, FL.
  • Clayton, D.A., Giffith, C.J., Price, P.E. and Peters, A.C. (2003), “Food handers’ beliefs and self-reported practices”, International Journal of Environmental Health Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 25-39.
  • Coates, J.F. (2000), “Consequences of information technology on work in the twenty-first century”, Employment Relations Today, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 83-94.
  • Colombo, M.G., Mariotti, S. and Moro, C. (1997), “Evoluzione verso il Mercato Verticale Organizzato: il Caso Italtel”, L’Industria, Vol. XVIII No. 1, pp. 13-57.
  • Computer World and British Telecom (2003), “SME audit”, December.
  • Conely, S. (2002), “Overcoming consumer barriers to healty food safety behaviors: selling food thermometer use”, paper presented at Thinking Globally – Working Locally, Conference on Food Safety Education, Orlando, FL, 18-20 September.
  • Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R.W. (1990), “Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach”, Management Science, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 123-39.
  • Costigan, R., Ilter, S. and Berman, J. (1998), “A multi-dimensional study of trust in organizations”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. X No. 3, pp. 303-17.
  • Cronbach, L.J. (1970). Essential of psychological testing, Harper and Row, New York, NY.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997), Finding the Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life, Basic Books, New York, NY.
  • Dabholkar, P.A. (1992), “Role of affect and need for interaction in on-site service encounters”, in Sherry, J.F. and Sternthal, B. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Association of Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 563-9.
  • Davidove, A.E. and Schroeder, P.A. (1992), “Demonstrating ROI of Training”, Training & Development Journal, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 70-1.
  • Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
  • De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. and Kleijnen, M. (2001), “Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 184-207.
  • Day, C.S. (1984), Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage, West St Paul, MN.
  • Deeter-Schmeltz, D.R. and Norman Kennedy, K. (2002), “An exploratory study of the internet as an industrial communication tool. Examining buyers’ perceptions”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 145-54.
  • Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989), “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage”, Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 1504-11.
  • Duffy, G. and Dale, B.G. (2002), “E-commerce processes: a study of criticality”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 102 No. 8, pp. 732-41.
  • Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C. (1994), “Organizational images and member identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, pp. 432-41.
  • DTI (2000), The Small Business Service: A Public Consultation, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
  • Eastlick, M.A. (1996), “Consumer intention to adopt interactive teleshopping”, Marketing Science Institute Working Paper No. 86-113.
  • Eastlick, M.A. and Lotz, S. (1999), “Profiling potential adopters and non-adopters of an interactive electronic shopping medium”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 209-23.
  • eTForecasts (2004), “World usage pattern & demographics”, available at:, D.R., Carlson, Ernst and Young (1999), The Second Annual Young Internet Shopping Study, New York.
  • Ehiri, J.E. and Morris, G.P. (1996), “Hygiene training and education of food handlers: does it work?”, Ecology of Food and Nutrition, Vol. 35, pp. 243-51.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Making fast strategic decision in high-velocity environments”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 543-76.
  • Evans, D. (1996), “The merchants in Venice”, Computer Weekly, 9 May, p.34.
  • Fadden, M. (2000), “Get ready for new training push: e-business, courses teach underlying concept to a wide cross-section of employees”, Information Week, November, p. 318.
  • Fulantelli, G. and Allegra, M. (2003), “Small company attitude toward ICT based solutions: some key-elements to improve it”, Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 45-9.
  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Flexwork (2004), available at: (accessed 9 October 2004). ET 47, 8/9 660.
  • Garcia_Dastugue, S.J. and Lambert, D.M. (2003), “Internet-enabled coordination in the supply chain”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 32, pp. 251-63.
  • Geer, R. and Au, W. (2002), “The online learning community: strategies, problems, and issues”, paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, Auckland, December.
  • Genelot, D. (1998), Manager dans la Complexite, Reflexsions a l’Usage des Dirigeants, 2nd ed., INSEP Editions, Paris.
  • Gumaer, R. (1996), “Beyond ERP and MRPII”, IIE Solutions, vol. 29 No. 9, September, pp. 32-6.
  • Ghemawat, P. (1986), “Sustainable advantage”, Harvard Business Review, September-October, 64, pp. 53-8.
  • Ghorpade, J., Chen, M.M. and Caggiano, J. (1995), “Creating quality-driven performance appraisal systems”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 32-40.
  • Gillespie, I.A., Little, C.L. and Mitchell, R. (2000), “Microbiological examination of cold ready-tp-eat sliced meats from catering establishments”, Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 88, pp. 467-74.
  • Girin, J. (1990), “Analyse empirique des situation des gestion: elements de theories et de methode”, in Epistomologies et Sciences de Gestion, FNEGE, Paris.
  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973), “Program change and organizational properties”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 72, pp. 503-18.
  • Gray, C.W.J.A. and Allan, J.S. (2002), “Role of management education in developing capacity for innovation in small firms”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol. 2 Nos 4/5, pp. 373-89.
  • Greene, J.C. and McClintok, C. (1991), “The evolution of evaluation methodology”, Theory into Practice, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 13-20.
  • Greene, P.G., C.G. and Browne, T. (1997), “Resources in small firms: an exploratory study”, Journal of Small Business Strategy, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 25-40.
  • Griffith, C.J. (2002), “Social marketing and food safety in the UK”, paper presented at Thinking Globally – Working Locally, Conference on Food Safety Education, Orlando, FL, 8-20 September.
  • Gutek, S.P. (1988), “Training program evaluation: an investigation of perceptions and practice in non-manufacturing business organizations”, Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, Dissertation Abstract International, 49/05A, AAC8811288.
  • (2004), Global Internet Statistics, available at:
  • Goffman, E. (1974), Les Rites d’Interaction, Minuit, Paris.
  • Hall, R. (1992), “The strategic analysis of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 1135-44.
  • Hamill, J. (1997), “The internet and international marketing”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 300-23.
  • Han, J.K., Kim, N. and Srivastava, R.K. (1998), “Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 30-45.
  • Hansen, T. (2005), “Consumer adoption of online grocery buying: a discriminant analysis”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 101-21.
  • Hazel, D. (1996), “Non store retail comes together with chains”, Chain Store Age State of the Industry, Supplement, August, pp. 32A-33A.
  • Hiemstra, R. (1993), “Three underdeveloped models for adult learning”, in An Update on Adult Learning Theory, Jossesy-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 37-46.
  • Hoare, C. (2002), Erikson on Development of Adulthood, (extended ed.), Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  • Holak, S.L. (1988), “Determinants of innovative durable adoption: an empirical study with implications for early product screening”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5, pp. 50-69.
  • Holak, S.L. and Lehmann, D.R. (1990), “Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: an exploratory model”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 7, pp. 59-73.
  • Holland, J.H. (1992), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Howes, M., McEwen, S., Griffiths, M. and Harris, L. (1996), “Food handler certification by home study: measuring changes in knowledge and behavior”, Dairy, Food and Environmental Sanitation,
  • Hurley, R.F. and Hult, G.T.M. (1998), “Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 42-54.
  • Institute of Work Psychology (1999), “Change management needs of South Yorkshire SMEs”, available at:
  • Internet World Stats (2005), available at: (accessed July 2005). Jeffres, L. and Atkin, D. (1996), “Predicting use of technologies for communication and consumer.
  • Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K. (1993), “Market orientation: antecedents and consequence”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 53-70.
  • Jay, L.S., Comar, D. and Govenlock, L.D. (1999), “A video study of Australian domestic food-handilng practices”, Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 62 No. 11, pp. 1285-96.
  • Jennings, P. and Beaver, G. (1995), “The performance and competitive advantage of small firms: a management perspective”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2.
  • Jennings, P.L. and Banfield, P. (1993), “Improving competence in small firms”, proceedings of the 16th National Small Firm Policy and Research Conference, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham.
  • Kanter, R.M. (1990), “How to compete”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No. 4,pp. 7-8.
  • Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. and Chervany, N.L. (1999), “Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 183-213.
  • Kassa, H., Harrington, B., Bisesi, M. and Khuder, S. (2000), “Comparisons of microbiological evaluations of selected kitchen areas with visual inspections for preventing potential risk of foodborne outbreaks in food service operations”, Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 509-13.
  • Kautz, K. and Larsen, E.A. (2000), “Diffusion theory and practice: disseminating quality management and software process improvement innovations”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 11-26.
  • Kauffman, S. (1995), At Home in the Universe, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  • Kerin, R.A., Kalyanaram, G. and Howard, D.J. (1996), “Product hierarchy and brand strategy influences on the order of entry effect for consumer packaged goods”, Journal of Product Innovation and Management, Januray, Vol. 13, No. 13, pp. 235-50.
  • Kearns, P. and Miller, T. (1996), Measuring the Impact of Training and Development on the Bottom Line, Technical Communication Publishing.
  • Komenar, M. (1997), Electronic Marketing, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  • Larrasquet, J.M. (1999), Le Management a l’Epreuve du Complexe, Vol. II, L’Harmattan, Paris and Montreal.
  • Lawless, N. (2004), “Managing student expectations in order to fast-track online group learning”, paper presented at the European Conference for E-Learning, Paris.
  • Leitch, C.M. and Harrison, R.T. (1999), “A process model for entrepreneurship education and development”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 83-109.
  • Leonrad-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. (1998), “Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology”, Management Science, Vol. 34 No. 10, pp. 1252-65.
  • Liang, T.P., Lin, C.Y. and Chen, D.N. (2004), “Effects of electronic commerce models and industrial characteristics of firm performance”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 No. 7, pp. 538-45.
  • Lieberman, M. and Montgomery, D. (1988), “First mover advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, No. 9, pp. 41-58.
  • Lomi, A. (1991), Reti Organizzative, II Mulino, Bologna.
  • Lorenzoni, G. (1992), “Accordi fra imprese e posizionamento strategico”, in Lorenzoni, G. (Ed.), Accordi, Reti e Vantaggio Competitivo, Etas, Milano.
  • Magdy, A. (1999), “Measuring and evaluation salesforce training effectiveness”, PhD thesis, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Va.
  • Malone, T.W., Yates, J. and Benjamin, R.I. (1987), “Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies”, Communication of the ACM, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 484-97.
  • Manning, C.K. (1994), “Food safety knowledge and attitudes of worker’s from institutional and temporary food service operations”, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 94 No. 8, pp. 895-7.
  • Manning, C.K. and Snider, O.S. 91993), “Temporary public eating places: food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices”, Journal of Environmental Health, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 24-8.
  • Mainzer, K. (1997), Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind and Mankind, 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin.
  • Mandelbrot, B. (1977), Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
  • Manpower Service Commission (1981), Glossary of Training Terms, HMSO, London.
  • Martinsons, M.G. and Chong, P.R.C. (1999), “The influence of human factors and specialists involvement on information systems success”, Human Relations, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 135-48.
  • Matlay, H. (2001), “Managing training, learning and knowledge in SMEs: an international perspective”, Education + Training, Vol. 43 No. 8/9, pp. 393-4.
  • Martin, L.M. and Matlay, H. 92001), “‘Blanker’ approaches to promoting ICT in small firms: some lessons from the DTI ladder adoption model in the UK”, Journal of Internet Research, November.
  • Mathieson, K. (1991), “Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 173-91.
  • Mayfield, M.K. (1985), “Competence: a context for professional development”, in Horner, E.E. (Ed.), Continuing Education: Issues and Challenges, World Conferences on Continuing Education for the Library and Information Science Professions, August 1985, K.G. Saur, New York, NY, pp. 241-51.
  • McCalman, J. (1999), “Self managing teams in high technology manufacture: overcoming technological barriers”, Microelectronics International, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 21-6.
  • McClelland, S. (1994), “A model for designing objective-oriented training evaluations”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 3-9.
  • McDougall, N. (1990), “Management training evaluation for decision making”, MSc dissertation, UMIST, Manchester.
  • McDaniel, R.R. and Walls, M. (1997), “Diversity as a management strategy for organizations: a view through the lenses of chaos and quantum theories”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 371-83.
  • McKenzie-Mohr, D. (1999)), “Community based social marketing”, available at:
  • McKenzie-Mohr, D. and Smith, W. (1999), Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community Based Social Marketing, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC.
  • Mederios, L., Hilliers, V., Kendall, P. and Mason, A. (2001), “Evaluation of food safety education for consumers”, Journal of Nutrition Education, Vol. 33, pp. S27-S34.
  • Merriam, S.B. (1993a), “Adult learning: “Where have we come from? Where are we headed?”, in An Update on Adult Learning Theory, Jossey-bass, San Francisco, CA, PP. 5-14.
  • Milling, P. (1991), “Strategische Planungs – und Kontrollsysteme zur Unterstu”tzung betrieblicher Lernprozesse”, in Milling, P. (Ed.), System management and Management systeme, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 11-31.
  • Milling, P. (2002), “Understanding and managing innovation processes”, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 73-86.
  • Mitchell, A.A. and Dacin, P.A. (1996), “The assessment of alternative measure of consumer expertise”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23, pp. 219-39.
  • Morris, B. (1996), “The brand’s the thing”, Fortune, 4 March, pp. 72-86.
  • Moldoveanu, M.C. and Bauer, R.M. (2004), “On the relationship between organizational complexity and organizational structuration”, Organization Science, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 98-118.
  • Morin, E. and Le Moigne, J.L. (1999), L’Intelligence de la Complexite, L’Harmattan, Paris and Montreal.
  • Morris, A. and Feldman, D. (1996), “The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 986-1010.
  • Morrison, P., Caffin, N. and Wallace, R. (1998), “Small food service establishments still on amber light for adopting Australian HACCP based food safety code”, British Food Journal, Vol. 100 No. 8, pp. 364-70.
  • Newman, M. (1999), “Maler’s Regard: Images of Adult Learning, Steward Victor Publishing, Sydney.
  • Nooteboom, B. (1994), “Innovations and diffusions in small firms: theory and evidence”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp. 327-47.
  • Noh, J. and Fitzsimmmmons, J.A. (1999), “Effects of information technology on marketing performance of Korean service firms”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 307-21.
  • Nonaka, I. (1991), “The knowledge-creating company”, Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 2-9.
  • Nguyen, T.D. and Nguyen, T.M.T. (2001), “Knowledge internationalization in the firm and its implications for business education”, Economic Development, Vol. 11, pp. 31-3 (in Vietnamese).
  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H> (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  • O’Shea, J. and Madigan, C. (1997), Dangerous Company, Times Business, New York, NY.
  • Oteri, T. and Ekanem, E.E. (1989), “Food hygiene behavior among hospital food handers”, Public Health, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 153-9.
  • Parasuraman, A. and Colby, C.L. (2001), Techno-Ready Marketing, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Peterson, R.A., Balasubramanina, S. and Bronnenberg, B.J. (1997), “Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 329-46.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1997), “The new internal network organization: process and performance”, Innovation Update, No. 2, pp. 5-6.
  • Philips, J.J. (1991), “Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods”, Glf Publishing Company, Houston, TX.
  • Polatoglu, V.N. and Ekin, S. (2001), “An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers’ acceptance of internet banking services”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 156-65.
  • Pierce, J. Kostova, T. and Dirks, K. (2001), “Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 298-310.
  • Pithers, R.T. (1998), Improving Learning through Effective Training, Social Science Press, Katoomba.
  • Poon, S. and Jevons, C. (1997), “Internet-enabled international marketing: a small business network perspective”, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 13 No. 1/3, pp. 29-33.
  • Plossl, G. (1994), Orlicky’s Material Requirements Planning, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  • Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Porter, M.E. (1987), “From competitive advantages to corporate strategy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.65 No. 3, pp. 43-59.
  • Porter, M.E. (1996), “What is strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 6, pp. 61-78.
  • Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of corporations”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 79-91.
  • Pras, B. and Tarondeau, J.C. (1979), “Typologies de la recherché en gestion”, Enseignement et Gestion, No. 9, pp. 5-11.
  • Quelch, J.A. and Klein,L.R. (1996), “The internet and international marketing”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 65-75.
  • Raab, R.T., Swanson, B.E. and Wentling, T.L. (1990), “Improving Training Quality, Food and Agriculture Organisation of United Nations, Rome.
  • Randell, G. (1994), “Employee appraisal”, in Sisson, K. (Ed.), Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice in Britain, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford.
  • Redmond, E.C. (2002), “Food safety behavior in the home: development, application and evaluation of a social marketing food safety education initiative”, PhD thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.
  • Redmond, E. and Griffith, C.J. (2003a), “A comparison and evaluation of research methods used in consumer food safety studies”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 17-33.
  • Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R. (1990), “Casual ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Rview, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 88-102.
  • Ricard, J. (1999), Biological Complexity and the Dynamics of Life Processes, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Robinson, W.T. and Fornell, C. (1985), “Sources of market pioneer in consumer goods industries”, Journal of Marketing Research, August, Vol. 22, pp. 305-17.
  • Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffucion of Innovations, 4th ed., The Free Press, New York, NY< pp. 518.
  • Rogers, E.M. and Shoemaker, F.F. (1971), Communication of Innovations” A Cross-cultural Approach, Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Ronchi, S. (2003), The Internet and the Customer-Supplier Relationship, Ashgate, Aldershot.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper & Brothers, New York, NY.
  • Senge, P.M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline – The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Currency & Doubleday, New York, NY.
  • Shadur, M.A., Rodwell, J.J., Simmons, D.E. and Bamber, G.J. (1994), “International best practice quality management and high performance: inferences from the Australian automotive sector”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 609-31.
  • Shamsudin A. (1995), “Contextual factors associated with evaluation practice of selected adult and continuing education provider in Malaysia”, unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
  • Shaw, J., Duffy, M., Jenkins, G. Jr and Gupta, N. (1999), “Positive and negative effect: signal sensitivity and pay satisfaction”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 189-206.
  • Shelton, S. and Alliger, G. (1993), “Who’s afraid of level 4 evaluation”, Training & Development Journal, Vol. 47 No. 6, p. 43-6.
  • Smith, A. (1990), “Evaluation of management training subjectivity and the individual”, Journal of European Training, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 12-15.
  • Smith, A.J. and Piper, J.A. (1990), “The tailor made training maze: a practitioner’s guide to evaluation”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 14 No. 8., pp. 2-24.
  • Smith, E. and Keating, J. (1997), Making Sense of Training Reform and Competency based Education, Social Science Press, Blue Mountains.
  • Scholtes, P.R. (1993), “Total quality or performance appraisal? Choose one”, National Productivity Review, Vol. 12 No. 3.
  • Scott, R.W. (1981), Organizations: Rational, Natural & Open Systems, Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Simon, H.A. (1976), Administrative Behavior, 3rd edition, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Simmons, G., Lindsay, A. and Harrison, S. (2001), “Evaluation of the inauguration New Zealand foodsafe partnership food safety campaign”, Journal of the New Zealand Dietetic Association, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 8-13.
  • Sivadasan, S., Efstathiou, J., Frizelle, G., Shirazi, R. and Calinsecu, A. (2002), “An information-theoretic methodology for measuring the operational complexity of supplier-customer systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 80-102.
  • Sinkula, J.M., Baker, W.E. and Noordewier, T. (1997), “A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge and behavior”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 305-18.
  • Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. (1995), “Market orientation and learning organization”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 63-74.
  • Stacey, R.D. (1995), “The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 477-95.
  • Sterman, J.D. (2000), Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
  • Stewart, T.A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, Doubleday/Currency, New York, NY.
  • Storey, D.J. (1994), “Understanding the Small Business Sector”, Routledge, London.
  • Tan, M. and Teo, T.S.H. (2000), “Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 1-44.
  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 509-33.
  • Thomas, J.B. and McDaniel (1990), “Interpreting strategic issues: effects of strategy and the information processing structure of top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 286-306.
  • Tornatzky, L.G. and Klein, K.J. (1982), “Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a meta-analysis of findings”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 8-45.
  • Tornatzky, L. and Fleischer, M. (1990), The Processes of Technological Innovation, Lexington Books, New York, NY.
  • Turnbull, P.W. and Meenaghan, A. (1980), “Diffusions of innovation and opinion leadership”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 3-33.
  • Van Tassel, S. and Weitz, B.A. (1997), “Interactive home shopping: all the comforts of home”, Direct Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 10, pp. 40.
  • UK Online (2000), International Benchmarking Study, London.
  • UK Online (2001), International Benchmarking Study, London.
  • Ulbrich, F. (2000), “A decision-support framework for electronic commerce in small and medium-sized enterprises”, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, available at: (accessed 25 November 2004).
  • Vacca, S. (1990), “Concetto di Rete e Organizzazione delle Impresse”, in Pilotti, L. and Pozzana, R. (Eds), I Contratti di Franchising, Egea, Milano.
  • Venkatesh, S., Carpenter, G.S., Krishnamurthi, L. (1998), “Late mover advantage: how innovative late entrants outsell pioneer”, Journal of Marketing Research, February, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 54-70.
  • Vogel, E.F. (1985), Comeback, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
  • Wacheux, F. (1998), “Les situations de gestion strategique et le contexte organisationnel de l’action, Revue de GRH, No. 26-7, pp. 36-50.
  • Walker, E., Pritchard, C. and Forsythe, S. (2003), “Food handlers’ hygiene knowledge in small food businesses”, Food Control, Vol. 14, pp. 339-43.
  • Walther, J.B. (1992), “Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction”, Communication Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 52-90.
  • Weick, K.E. 91979), The Social Psychology of Organizing Reading, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-80.
  • Westhead, P. and Storey, D. (1996), “Management training and small firm performance: why is the link so weak?”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 12-25.
  • Wheatley, M.J. 91992), Leadership and the New Science, Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA.
  • Wight, O. (1981), Manufacturing Resource Planning: MRPII, Oliver Wight Limited Publications, Essex Junction, VT.
  • Williamson, B., Bright, D. and Parkin, B. (2001), “Management learning and team based working”, Management Research News, Vol. 24 Nos ½.
  • Wind, J. (1997), “Preemptive Strategies”, in Day, G.S.
  • Winter, S. and Taylor, L. (1996), “The role of IT in the transformation of work: a comparison of post industrial, industrial and proto industrial organization”, Information System Research, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 5-21.
  • Wolcott, P., Press, L., McHenry, W., Goodman, S. and Foster, W. (2001), “A framework for assessing the global diffusion of the internet”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 50.
  • Worsfold, D. and Griffith, C. (1996), “Cross-contamination in domestic food preparation”, Hygiene and Nutrition in Food service and Catering, Vol. 1, pp. 151-62.
  • Wouters, M.J.F., Sharman, G.J. and Wortmann, H.C. (1999), “Reconstructuring the sales and fulfillment cycle to create supply chain differentiation”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 83-97.
  • Yusuf, Y. and Little, D. (1998), “An empirical investigation of enterprise-wide integration of MRPII”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 66-86.
  • Zook, C. and Allen, J. (2001), “Profit from the Core: Growth Strategy in an Era of Turbulence”, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA.



Having doubts about how to write your paper correctly?

Our editors will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Get started
Leave your email and we will send a sample to you.
Thank you!

We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service.

Get help with my paper
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. You can leave an email and we will send it to you.