One of the major issues for competitive advantage, therefore, is the successful motivation and training of staff. Despite a plethora of theories (Locke and Latham, 1990a; 288) which have analyzed work based motivation and satisfaction, however, theories remain commoner than the evidence to support them.
In the increasing competitive environment, organizations have to focus on value of investments in human resources especially performance management as a major source of competitive advantage. Although, business strategy means of competition is common conversation in the executive suite, taking a strategic approach can be especially beneficial for staff functions within companies, as they often are required to justify their need for resources and their contribution to the company.
Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Employee Performance Management" essay for youCreate order
The following study presents the analysis of performance management issues on Marks and Spencer’s (M&S) employee motivation and training.
Performance improvement provides M&S with needed information on their employees. The information helps M&S develop the skills of the employees based on the information collected at the appraisal, it helps recognize when training is needed. Performance improvement helps M&S by improving their service by having able workers that work to their full ability and by improving the relationship between workers and the company.
Here is Marks and Spencer’s definition of performance management: Performance management is a joint process that involves both the supervisor and the employee, who identify common goals, which are linked to the goals of the organization. This process results with the establishment of written performance exceptions later used as measures
for feed back and performance evaluation. (M&S Annual report and financial statements 2008) Marks and Spencer is a multinational company have grown from a penny bazaar in the late 1880’s. UK based company to become one of the largest and most well known organisations of British culture. As a leading retailer, with a customer base of 10 million per week in over 300 UK stores, also trades in 30 countries worldwide, producing a Group turnover in excess of 8 billion. (M&S Annual report and financial statements, 2008)
M&S have to be able to manage its resources to meet the customer’s needs and those of the market. Following three years of declining profits due to economic recession, the company has attempted to rejuvenate itself. Though the company is regaining market share and profits are beginning to raise they are still suffering some problems which have resulted in the company selling some of their foreign subsidiaries and axing jobs to concentrate on their core business. Such a turn around exemplifies well the need for strategy in this type of organisation. Strategic issues will revolve around the long-term and concentrate on the direction and scope of the organisation. Furthermore they will concern resources, competition, meeting needs of stakeholders and markets. All of this will be in a constantly changing and dynamic environment and so organisations must concentrate their human recourse management especially employee’s performance management each level and use right strategy on HR policy. This paper is trying to find out that employee performance improvement by motivating and training.
A key issue in understanding and applying techniques of performance management is defining exactly what is meant by ‘performance’ and ‘performance management’.
The paper hereafter discusses and evaluates the competing definitions as they are understood in organizational and human resources practice.
Performance is a multi-level, multi-dimensional construct. It is important to understand what level of performance is considered important when an organization talks about performance management. At each level- organizational, work unit or individual; there are a combination of factors that influence performance: direct, indirect, individual and situational. Any human resource intervention designed to assist, enhance, encourage ‘performance management’ has to be effectively targeted at the right combination of factors (Study Guide 2004, pp.2-8).
Contemporary organizations consider performance to fall into two major areas: performance at the individual level and performance at the organizational level (Williams 2002). At the individual level there are differing views on what performance is. Some research regards it as simply the record of outcomes achieved (Bernadin 1995). Performance has also been defined as behavior, that is, the way in which teams and individuals get work done (Campbell 1990). At the individual level performance can be thought of as either ‘what’ is achieved, that is as output and results, or as ‘how’ it is achieved, that is demonstrated behaviors, competencies, adherence to process (Study Guide 2004, pp.2-6).
Williams (2002, cited in Study Guide 2004, pp.2-7) starts with the proposition that individual performance is behavior, which is determined by factors of declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge and motivation. Declarative knowledge is the ‘what’ of performance; procedural knowledge is the ‘how’ to do’ whereas motivation refers to the exercise of choice over whether or not to perform; what level of effort to expend; and, whether or not to maintain a consistent level of effort on the specified tasks over an extended period. The three factors above are direct determinants of performance. There are also indirect determinants which might be termed ‘situational’ factors, first are those inherent in the individual employee, the second are those inherent in the work context, which might be termed ‘situational’ factors (Study Guide 2004).
However, the most comprehensive view of performance is achieved if it is defined as embracing both behavior and outcomes (Armstrong & Baron 1999).
Performance at the individual level cannot be seen as merely a function of ‘ability’ and ‘motivation’. Issues such as individual differences, the context in which performance is expected, and the interactions between system and individuals should also be considered. Performance at the individual level is even more ‘multi-dimensional’ than performance at the organizational level (Study Guide 2004).
The concept of performance as embracing productivity or efficiency as well as effectiveness, adaptability and responsiveness. It is clear, then, that organizational performance is far from being a simple concept (Williams 2002, p. 68). Somehow, at the organizational level we are concerned with issues of efficiency, effectiveness and productivity.
To address the aforementioned multi-dimensions, we need meaningful performance measures. An increasingly popular approach to measure organizational performance has been through the use of the ‘Balanced Scorecard’ developed by Kaplan and Norton in 1996, which attempts to capture some of the contradictory nature of organizational performance (Williams 2002). It aims to measure performance in terms of four sets of indictors namely financial, customer, internal business process and learning and growth. The aforementioned four sets of indicators have each taking a different perspective. To succeed financially, how should we appear to our shareholders; to achieve our vision, how should we appear to our customers; to satisfy our shareholders and customers what internal business processes must we excel at and to achieve our vision, how will we sustain our ability to change and improve.
It is important to remember that when studying performance management, we must consider both inputs – the behavior aspects and outputs the results aspects. Hartle (1995) calls this the ‘mixed model’ of performance management, reflecting the importance of both the ‘how and what’ of performance. This is when we consider that performance is about how things are done as well as what is done.
Efficiency is defined by Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter (2000, p. 8) as the relationship between inputs and outputs, the goal of which is to minimize resource costs whereas effectiveness is defined as the goal attainment. Efficiency is often as ‘doing things right’ – that is not wasting resources; effectiveness is often described as ‘doing the right thing’ – that is, those work activities that will help the organization reach its goals. Whereas efficiency is concerned with the means of getting things done, effectiveness is concerned with the ends.
Performance and its relationship to productivity are of a vital importance in understanding and applying techniques of performance management. Guzzo (1988, p. 63 cited in Williams 2002, p. 52) claims that productivity may mean different things to different people, Pritchard (1995, p. 448 cited in Williams 2002, p. 52) has recently noted the wide range of meanings attaching to the term productivity: the term has been used to refer to individuals, groups, organizational units entire organizations, industries, and nations. It has been used as a synonym for output, efficiency, motivation, individual performance, organizational effectiveness, production, profitability, cost/effectiveness, competitiveness, and work quality.
Productivity is the ratio of outputs to inputs, a ratio that reflects the efficiency with which resources are transformed into outputs (Guzzo 1988, cited in Williams 2002). And Williams 2002 refers productivity as a systems concept and that inputs are subject to some conversion processes which lead to the production of outputs; in seeking to measure productivity a basic question that is concerned is how well or how efficiently available inputs are converted into outputs.
In a general sense, by inputs, it is meant all the resources, employees, raw materials, energy, buildings, equipment etc, that are required to manufacture a product or deliver a service. Output is typically taken to mean what an organization produces. Output has traditionally been measured in quantitative terms, however, there is also a quality aspect of output (Williams 2002).
Viewing productivity as a system concept tells that inputs are converted into outputs via some transformation processes. Similarly, an organization, as a system, comprises many subsystems and it is these which are concerned directly or indirectly, with the transformation processes that convert inputs to outputs (Williams 2002, p. 57)
Performance management is defined by De Cieri & Kramar (2002, p. 286) as the means through which managers ensure that employees’ activities and outputs are congruent with the organization’s goals. Performance management evolved out of a long history or managerial attempts to improve productivity, efficiency and effectiveness at all levels in an organization. Study Guide 2004 outlined that one of the difficulties with the concept performance management is that the term means different things to different people.
One main interpretation that has come to dominate in practice is that performance management is a system for managing organizational performance; a system for managing employee performance and a system for integrating the management of organizational and individual performance (Williams 2002, p. 10). Walter (1995, p.10) states that performance management is about directing and supporting employees to work as effectively and efficiently as possible in line with the needs of the organization. Armstrong 1994 defined performance management as a process designed to improve organizational, team and individual performance whereas Armstrong & Baron 1999 describes performance management as a strategic and integrated approach to deliver sustained success to organizations by improving the performance of the people who work in term and by developing the capabilities of teams and individual contributors.
Performance management is far more than its precursor ‘performance appraisal’, it goes beyond the annual appraisals, ratings and interviews to incorporate employees’ goals, training, rewards and individual development. Thus, a performance management system focuses on an ongoing process of performance improvement, at the individual and organizational level, rather than emphasizing an annual performance review (DeSimone, Werner & Harris 2002, cited in Study Guide 2004, p.1-3).
There is no one right way of managing performance. The approach will depend on the context of the organization. That is, its culture, structure, technology and the type of people involved. Thus, recognizing the importance of managing within the context of the business.
Organizational structure is defined as the degree of complexity, formalization and centralization crated to facilitate the coordination of activities and to control the actions of organizational members (Robbins, Waters-Marsh, Caccioppe & Millett 2001, cited in Study Guide 2004, pp.1-12).
Organizational culture is a more intangible aspect, based on the shared values, customs, rituals and norms of the organization. Culture, is long-lasting and can often take decades to change, it is very enigmatic and complex. Culture can assist performance management – they can also act as a major impediment. Conversely, performance management can be used as a tool to change culture (Study Guide 2004, pp.1-14).
Williams 2002 raised, from one point of view technology is part of performance management, one of the tools, that is, for managing performance. And, indeed, technology, especially information technology, has been in many cases a solution to a performance problem which has led to that business gaining competitive advantage.
From a human resource perspective it is very much a systemic process bringing together issues of: organizational performance; managerial effectiveness; individual performance; skill development; and reward management. These five aspects must be integrated through human resource personnel and managers working together with staff to achieve the organization’s desired outcomes (Williams 2002).
The processes that are applied to reward and remunerate employee motivation are aligned with performance management. In the industrial era, performance and productivity came primarily from physical effort coupled with capital invested in technology. As enter the new era of information technology, the performance and productivity of employees comes not from physical effort but from within employees – their knowledge, insights information, skills, abilities, innovativeness and creativity (Smith 1998, p. 153 cited in Williams 2002, pp.1-16)
For managerial effectiveness, on the one hand, the manager would know about the policy, objectives, mission and goal of organization. On the other hand, the product or service delivered has to meet customer needs for achieving its goal, having good relationship and trust between the company and customer, thus, be more competitive in the marketplace. Research is needed to best fulfill customers’ needs. A plan or strategy has to be implemented to improve the company and its stuff’s performance to be more successful. Performance should in line with the company’s business plan. Employees’ performance should cope with the company’s strategies and should also keep on improving.
The focus of training and development programs and approaches in organizations is to achieve long-lasting behavioral changes which increase productivity at the individual, group and organizational level. As such, training and development comes under the ambit of performance management. As with other performance related aspects of the organization and its human resources, training and development is concerned with the identification of training needs. Based on a comparison of expected with actual performance, training interventions are designed, implemented and assessed to ascertain whether performance has been improved as a consequence of the training. Two of the significant performance management processes which assist the training and development cycle are job analysis and performance assessment. Job analysis provides valuable information on the tasks, job and role of the job and performance assessment assists in identifying where deficiencies in performance exist (Smith 1998, cited in Study Guide 2004, pp.1-17)
To unlock the intrinsic qualities of individual employees, not only does performance management address situational factors surrounding the employees, but it also seeks to address the motivational factors of employees. One approach to unlock these aptitudes and abilities is to consider compensation management as part and parcel of a performance management approach. Compensation management looks not only at extrinsic rewards, such as pay and bonuses, but also at those artifices, symbols, rewards and benefits which improve the motivation of employees to perform at higher levels. Suffice to point out that organizations which manage compensation and rewards poorly will fail to maximize their most important strategic resource – their human capital (DeSimone et al, 2002, p. 43, cited in Study Guide 2004 pp.1-17). It is because employees who achieve want to be recognized and rewarded for their efforts. And to motivate performance, outstanding performers must be identified and rewarded accordingly (Stone 2002).
According to Mitchell (1982) motivation is psychological process that cause encouragement, direction and insistence of voluntary actions that are goal oriented. Employee motivation is one of the key drivers of high performance as it encourages individuals to work hard, and desire to achieve a higher goal and a better performance. Robbins (1993) shares the same view, that motivation is the willingness to exercise high levels of effort towards organization goals and to satisfy individual needs. McKenna (2002, p.8) explains motivation as an emotion, ‘which is personal in nature, and comes from within the individual’. Robbins (1993) also describes that it is the individual needs that make the outcomes to be attractive and unsatisfied needs will create tension to stimulate drives within the individual and this is called motivation process. Please refer to Appendix 1 to see the phases of the motivational process. This study has been aimed to discuss different motivation theories and how it effectively increases employee performance.
There have been numerous motivation theories developed by many famous authors such as Chester Barnard, Max Webber, Joan Woodard, Bennis and Slater etc. According to Reis and Pena (2001), there was an evolution in the development of the motivation theories. Chester Barnard (1938) introduced the idea of traditional/classical form of motivation as “be tough” or “stick” and “be good” or “carrot” then followed with bureaucracy and human relation approach by Max Weber (1947) and Joan Woodard (1965) respectively. Then the turning point of the motivation history is in 1980s to 1990s was the “Total Quality Management” and “Reengineering” approach. Reis and Pena (2001) believe that today employee motivation is about satisfying your employees with empathy, understanding, friendship and respect at workplace. Please refer to Appendix 2 to view the evolution of motivation theories. According to McKenna (1999) the evolution of motivation theories have been breaking down and classifying generally into three categories. Ramlall (2004) also agrees that motivation should have three aspects of reinforcement, content and process theories.
The reinforcement theory is based on the concept that reinforcement conditions behavior. Reinforcement is the attempt to develop or strengthen desirable behavior by either giving positive consequences or withholding negative consequences (Nelson & Quick 1994). The theorists see behavior as environmentally caused. The reinforcement theory does not concentrate on the personal feelings of the individual, but rather what happens when the individual takes some action. What directs behaviors are reinforcements, when instantly followed by a response, increases the likelihood that the behavior will be repeated (Luthans & Stajkovic, 1999). In the workplace, Nemerov (1993) emphasized that it is important for managers to recognize and reward employees. Such recognition also helps individuals to fulfill the higher needs in Maslow and Alderfer’s hierarchies, providing workers with self-esteem and a sense of accomplishment.
According to Miner and Dachler (1973), content theories are primary emphasis on the particular motives or the types of motives. Berl and Williamson (1987) also describe content theories as understanding the key and driver which arouse or start behavior. Dainty (2002) and McKenna (1999) share a same concept of content theories; the two authors believe it is surrounding by four famous theories of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Herzberg’s Motivational-Hygiene, Alderfer’s existence relatedness and growth and McClelland’ needs theory.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs describes people have five classifications of needs which act as motivators; those are physiological needs, safety, social and belongingness, self esteem and self-actualization needs. According to Berl and Williamson (1987) the critical aspect of this theory is individual needs to satisfy lower level of need before moving upward. However, there have been many criticisms as Grigaliunas and Weiner (1974) argues that Maslow has been oversimplified and misrepresented. Wahba and Bridwell (1973) conducted a study which show that needs cannot be arranged in a hierarchy in every circumstance and hence feel that Maslow’s model is inappropriate.
Herzberg theory has two factors called hygiene (physiological) and motivational (egocentric) also receive considerable criticism by Wahba and Bridwell (1976). Maslow and Herzberg share very similar concepts that individual must achieve basic needs in order to move upward. This theory was also never tested fairly and lack of supporting evidence that job satisfaction leads to high job performance (House and Wigdor 1976). The argument is that job satisfaction may lead people to their comfort zone and not actively look to risk their current rewards (House and Wigdor, 1976). Although there are criticisms, these theories are easily and widely used in practice by considering motivation as a systematic theory.
Alderfer’s existence, relatedness and growth (ERG) theory assumes that if an individual can not satisfy the specific needs, then he/she can satisfy needs at a lower level, if the individual is frustrated at a given need level (Berl and Williamson, 1987). Maslow’s theory states that only one level of need can be motivational at a time while with Alderfer more than one level of need can influence a person to act at a given time. Berl, Williamson and Powell (1985), found through a survey that those who have satisfaction with growth needs have greater more desire for growth and individuals dissatisfied with existence needs had a greater desire for existence and related needs. Hence, this theory is useful for management to recognize a right person for the right task with realistic goal to motivate high performance. The relationship between these three theories is demonstrated in Appendix 3.
McClelland argues that motivation could be learnt from life experiences and the needs are developed through life such as need for achievement, need for affiliation and the need for power. Acquired needs theory is also influenced by society and culture changing overtime (McKenna, 1999). Hence employees would be more motivated and perform better if managers know their goals and touch correctly to their needs.
The process theories, according to Berl & Williamson (1987) provide an explanation of procedures which enable people to choose among different courses of action, the degree of effort expended and persistence over time. The process theories include Equity theory, intrinsic motivation theory, and Expectancy theory. Process theories contrast sharply with the earlier content theories, which focused on identifying factors associated with motivation in a relatively static environment. Process theorists view work motivation from a dynamic perspective and look for causal relationships across time and events as they relate to human behavior in the workplace (Steers, Mowday and Shapiro 2004).
The equity theory points towards the situations when individuals compare outcome-input ratio of their job to that of others (Robbins 2003). The people to whom individuals may compare themselves may belong inside or outside to the same organization as well as their own experiences in a different position within the same or another organization. This theory is strong when predicting absence and turnover behaviors and weak while predicting employee productivity. Equity theory points out that rewards significantly affect the level of motivation. McKenna (2005) argues that money and other rewards do not have a significant effect on motivation and it is other factors like better job satisfaction, positive feedbacks that do so.
Locke and Latham (1990, p.241) state that expectancy theory developed by Vroom emphasizes that ‘performance is a multiplicative function of expectancy, instrumentality and valence’. It suggests that the factors that motivate a person to act in a certain way depend on ‘the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of the outcome to the individual’ (Robbins 2003, p.173). This theory is strong to explain employee productivity, absenteeism and turnover. Quick (1988) further explains a five step process towards the practical application of the expectancy theory – define the expectations, make the work valuable, make the work doable, give regular feedback, and reward employees when they meet expectations.
The various motivational factors can be broadly grouped into intrinsic and extrinsic. The intrinsic factors include those are directly related to the work itself, like the enjoyment, responsibility and satisfaction of completing a task while extrinsic factors refer to those external factors like the recognition and rewards associated with the work (Amabile 1993). A study by Nowlin (1982) indicated that majority of the managers in both the private and public sectors were motivated by intrinsic factors like the work itself and the job responsibility. Based on a survey by Mullins, in which workers were induced to perform better in their jobs either by verbal recognition of good work or by a pay increase, it was found that performance was improved more significantly by the ‘intrinsic’ reward of verbal recognition than by the ‘extrinsic’ reward of additional money (Mullins 1996). Cully et al (1999) support this by evidence that regular performance appraisals and monitoring of individual quality do help to "boost morale" and improve "workplace well-being". It is also seen that it is possible to achieve synergy between these two types of motivational factors by creating a synergy between the person and his work environment (Amabile 1993). Smith (2005) adds to this argument by stating that it is important for leaders to understand the reason behind the employee’s motivation, otherwise they may offer things that are not really valued.
Di Cesare & Sadri (2003) explains the dimensions of cultural impact on employee motivation, stating ‘while the principle of leadership, motivation, and decision making may be applicable almost everywhere, their success or failure depends heavily on ways in which managers adapt to the local culture and work situation’ (cited in Di Cesare & Sadri 2003, p.30). Motivation is culture-bound, and managers must be careful not to impose their value system when drawing conclusions about what motivates people in different countries. Motivational differences are best understood by exploring countries individually, first by gaining an understanding of the culture and then by drawing implications from that culture about motivation.
Understanding what motivated employees and how they were motivated was the focus of many research which have been undertaken in this field by Frederic Herzberg, Douglas McGregor, David McClelland, Abraham Maslow and Elton Mayo. Each of them has a different theory about employee motivation. Frederic Herzberg’s developed this motivation theory during investigation of 2000 accountant and engineers in the USA. Two Factor Theory. He beloved that people are influenced by two factors- motivation and hygiene. Satisfaction and psychological growth was a factor of motivation factors. The result of hygiene factor was dissatisfaction. Hygiene factors are needed to ensure an employee does not become dissatisfied. They not lead to higher levels of motivation, but without them there is dissatisfaction. The typical factors are working conditions, salary, Security Company, job. Motivation factors are needed to motivate an employee into higher performance. He suggests that offer work should be arranged in the following ways: job enlargement, job nation and enrichment.
McGregor said that there are two fundamental approaches to managing people. Many managers prefer theory x, and generally get poor results. Enlightened managers use theory y, which produces better performance and results, and allows people to develop and growth.
The average person prefers to be directed. This person wants to avoid responsibility, is unambitious and wants security above all else. The average person does not like work and will avoid it. That is why most people must be forced with the threat of punishment to work towards organizational objectives.
People usually accept and often seek responsibility
People have self-control and self-direction in the pursuit of organizational objectives, without external control or the threat of punishment. Commitment to objectives is a function of rewards associated with their achievement. The capability to use a high degree of imagination and creativity in solving organizational problems is widely distributed in the population.
McClelland based on the Murray’s (1938) theory of personality. proposed a content theory of motivation. In his book (1961) The achieving society, McClelland said that human motivation comprises three dominant needs: the need for achievement , the need for power and the need for affiliation.
People with a high need for achievement are trying to avoid both low-risk and high-risk situations. They avoid low-risk situations because the easily attained success is not a genuine achievement. In high-risk they can see the outcome as one of chance rather than one’s own effort. High individuals prefer work that has ideally a 50% chance of success. Those people need regular feedback in order to monitor the progress of their achievements. They prefer either to work alone or with other people.
People with a high need for affiliation need to feel accepted by others and be in harmonious relationships with other people.
Person who need for power can be personal or institutional. People who need personal power want to direct others, and this need is perceived as undesirable. Those who need institutional power –social power- want to organize the efforts of others to further the goals of the organization.
Elton Mayo is known from his research including Hawthorne Studies and his books. He started his experiment on the effect light in productivity but those experiments showed not clear connection between productivity and the amount of lighting. After that he began to wonder what kind of changes would influence production. He took a group of 6 women and segregated them and then changed their conditions of work in many ways.
After 5 year period he observed that productivity in the group rose to the highest levels. In the end he realized that firstly:
the women felt important because they had been singled out
the women had developed good relationships between each other and had been
allowed to set their own work patterns
the case of relationship had made for a much more pleasant working environment
Based on Frederic Herzberg theory of two factors both of them must be done together at the same time. Treat people very good, the best as you can so they have a minimum of dissatisfaction. Use people so they get achievement and responsibility they can growth in their work. “Herzberg’s theory is applicable and relevant to a wide range of managers in all manner of different environment – even a turkey farm” ( Billsberry 1996: 6)
Theory X: Managers have to police their staff, whom they can not trust. In that atmosphere there is impossible to achievement any creative work for the manager and employees.
Theory Y: Manager should let people to develop and watching the development and actualization of people by themselves.
People with different needs are motivated differently. Achieved- motivated people should get challenging projects with reachable goals. For them money are not important motivator, it is an effective form of feedback. They are more concentrated with personal achievement than with rewards of success. In high need for affiliation – people need perform best in a cooperative environment. In high need for power management should provide power seekers the opportunity to manage others.
“Elton Mayo showed that the membership of small groups of workmates exercised great influence on the manner in which they worked”(Vernon 1986: p. 131) .
His experiments showed an increase in worker productivity was produced by the psychological stimulus of being singled out, involved and made to feel important. He believed that work satisfaction was based on security, recognition, being part of a team, over and above monetary rewards.
Research and observation show that well motivated employees are more productive and creative.” Motivation is a key aspect in keeping employees happy and to creating a positive work environment
It is important that a business provides training that is consistent with the business strategy. The most important steps in developing a training strategy are to , Identifying the skills and abilities needed by trainees, drawing up an action plan to show how investment in training and development will help meet business goals and objectives, Implementing the plan, monitoring progress and training effectiveness.
The significance and value of training has long been recognized. Consider the popular and often repeated quotation, “Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a person to fish and you feed him for a life time.” This simple but profound saying is attributed to the wisdom of Confucius who lived in the 5th century BC. Given today’s business climate and the exponential growth in technology with its effect on the economy and society at large, the need for training is more pronounced than ever.
Training, in the most simplistic definition, is an activity that changes people’s behavior Increased productivity is often said to be the most important reason for training. But it is only one of the benefits. Training is essential not only to increase productivity but also to motivate and inspire workers by letting the know how important their jobs are and giving the all the information they need to perform those jobs (Anonymous, 1998).McNamara (n.d) lists the following as general benefits from employee training:
Increased job satisfaction and morale
Increased efficiencies in process, resulting in financial gain
Increased capacity to adopt new technologies and methods
Increased innovation in strategies and products
Reduced employee turnover
This is only partial listing of the many benefits that result from training. Training that is appropriate to the needs of an organization can add great value. Training is not always the answer to performance problem. Brandt Sakakeeny, training industry analyst for Soloman Smith Barney believes that training can be great investment and training can be a waste of money (Rosner, 1999).training is indeed a waste when the desired behavior does not occur. Gupta acknowledges that not all performance problems can be addressed by training. In many cases, non – training interventions are necessary (Gupta 1999). The key is to identify what problems can be attributed are necessary (Gupta 1999).The key is to identify what problems can be attributed to training deficiencies and, once that is accomplished, to insure that the right training is implemented. Bartram and Gibson, in their Training Needs Analysis Toolkit agree. Without the right training, employees can be the orgainsation’s biggest liability. Trained effectively, however, they can become your biggest asset (Bartram and Gibson, 2000). Rosner (1999) adds another ingredient for success – support after training. He states, “the most effective programs train workers in new behaviors and then train managers to support employees as they apply learning daily (Rosner, 1999). Support and endorsement from management can greatly enhance training results.
Introduce new trainees to the business ( know as “ induction training”)
Help provide the skills the business needs (in particular asking the workforce more flexible or being trained on new higher technology machinery)
Provide trainees with better knowledge about the business and the market it operates
Provide support for jobs that are complex and for which the required skills and knowledge are often changing (e.g. a firm of lawyers training staff about new legislation)
Support the introduction of new working methods, such as a firm introducing new lean production techniques
Reduce the need for supervision and therefore free up valuable manager time
Help improve quality of product or service and lower customer complaints
Increase employee motivation and loyalty to the business
Learning happens when our senses are stimulated. We quickly learn when we are young that if we drink something that is very hot, we will experience the feeling of pain and the lingering effect of burned tongue. How did we learn this? Someone ay have warned us that a beverage was hot, or there may have been a sign or label that told us to be careful, we ay have felt the heat of the beverage through the cup that radiated onto our hands, and by the pain that the words of warning, see the label, feel the heat from the cup, and proceed to take a drink we are very careful. We gathered the information through our senses, learning quickly that if we want to avoid a burned tongue, we should let the beverage cool and sip carefully.
This is simple example is applicable to any of successful training or learning, by linking learning through engaging the senses we are more likely to remember ,retain, and use the information. The goal of any training interaction should be make learning easy, effective, engaging and productive. To do this, it is essential to understand how people learn. As we discussed here, one mode is through the senses. Our senses are information superhighways, by taking in information through a variety of channels and processing the information at extremely high rates. Our brains process information taken in by sight faster than hearing. Our abilities to master knowledge, concepts and skills are directly linked to our senses. Information presented through learning tools that invoke both words and pictures in seven times more likely to be retrained than words alone. In addition to visual aids, adding materials that can be manipulated by the learner and incorporate taste/smell, the opportunity for learning and information that is retained and remembered increases to rate ten times ore than through words alone.
There are any different theories of how people learn. It is interesting to think about your own particular way of learning and to recognize that everyone does not learn the way you do. Burns (1995, pp99) ‘conceives of learning as a relatively permanent change in behavior with behavior including both observable activity and internal process such as thinking, attitudes and emotions.’ It is clear that burns include motivation in this definition of learning.
Traditional sensory stimulation theory has as its basic premise that effective learning occurs when the senses are stimulated (Laird, 1985). Laird quotes research that found that the vast majority of knowledge held by adults (75%) is learned through seeing. Hearing is the next most effective (about 13%) and other senses- touch, smell and taste account for 12 % of what we know. By stimulating the senses, especially the visual sense, learning can be enhanced. However, this theory says that if multi – senses are stimulated, greater learning takes place. Stimulation through the senses is achieved through a greater variety of colors , volume levels, strong statements facts presented visually, use of variety of techniques and media.
This theory was developed by the behaviorist school of psychology, notably by B.F.Skinner earlier this century (Laird 1985, Burns 1995). Skinner believed that behavior is a function of its consequences. The learner will repeat the desired behavior if positive reinforcement (a pleasant consequence) follows the behavior.
Positive reinforcement, or ‘rewards’ can include verbal reinforcement such as ‘ThatÕs great’ or ‘You’re certainly on the right track’ through to more tangible rewards such as a certificate at the end of the course or promotion to a higher level in an organization.
Negative reinforcement also strengthens a behavior and refers to a situation when a negative condition is stopped or avoid as a consequence of the behavior. Punishment, on the other hand, weakens a behavior because a negative condition is introduced or experienced as a consequence of the behavior and teaches the individual not to repeat the behavior which was negatively reinforced. Burns says that punishment is widely used in everyday life although it only works for a short tie and often only when the punishing agency is present.
The emphasis here is on the importance of experience, meaning, problem solving and the department of insights (Burns 1995, p.112). Burns notes that this theory has developed the concept that individuals have different needs and concerns at different times, and that they have subjective interpretations in different contexts.
The basic premise of this theory is that the ‘individual personality consists of many elements… specifically… the intellect, emotions, the body impulse (or desire), intuition and imagination (Laird, 1985, p.121) that all require activation if learning is to be more effective.
Carl Rogers and others have developed the theory of facilitative learning. The basic premise of this theory is that learning will occur by the educator acting as a facilitator, that is by establishing an atmosphere in which learners feel comfortable to consider new ideas and are not threatened by external factors (Laird 1985)
Kolb proposed a four – stage learning process with a model that is often referred to in describing experiential learning (Mc Gill & Beaty 1995). The process can begin at any of the stages and is continuous, i.e there is no limit to the number of cycles ,can make in a learning situation. This theory asserts that without reflection we would simply continue to repeat our mistakes.
Kolb’s research found that people learn in four ways with the likelihood of developing one mode of learning more than another.
Though concrete experience
Through observation reflection
Through abstract conceptualization
Through active experimentation
Differences in learning styles:
As already discussed, the idea that people learn in different ways has been explored over the last few decades by researchers. Kolb, one of the most influential of these, found that individuals begin with their preferred style in the experiential learning cycle
Honey and Mumford building on Kolb’s work, identified four learning styles:
Activist ( enjoys the experience itself)
Reflector ( spends a great deal of time and effort reflecting)
Theorist (good at making connections and abstracting ideas from experience)
Pragmatist (enjoys the planning stage)
There are strengths and weaknesses in each of these styles Honey and Mumfors argue that learning is enhanced when we think about our learning style so that we can build on strengths and work towards minimizing weakness to improve the quality of learning.
Action learning is the approach that links the world of learning with the world of the action through a reflective process within small cooperative learning groups known as ‘action learning sets’. The ‘sets’ meet regularly to work on individual memebers ‘real-life issues with the aim of learning with and from each other. The ‘father’ of Action Learning , Reg Revans, has said that there can be no learning without action and no action without learning.
Revans argued that learning can be shown by the following equation, where L is learning; P is programmed knowledge (eg traditional instruction) and Q is questioning insight
L = P + Q
Revans, along with many others who have used , researched and taught about this approach, argued that action learning is ideal for finding solutions to problem that do not have a ‘right’ answer because the necessary questioning insight can be facilitated by people learning with and from each other in action learning ‘sets’.
Malcolm Knowles (1978, 1990) is the theorist who brought the concept of adult learning to the fore. He has argued that adulthood has arrived when people behave in adult ways and believes themselves to be adults. Then they should be treated as adult learning was special in a number of ways.
Pogson and Tennant (1995) provide a perspective of adulthood as a social construction. They say that the concept of a life’s course varies for different individuals and different cultures: therefore trainers and trainees educators should be wary of definitive views of adults and their behavior.
An adult emotional response can affect learning
Some adults can approach formal educational settings with anxiety and feelings of high or low self – efficacy. Their approach to new learning contexts can be influenced by how they appraise or evaluate the new experience.
Behaviorism views development as a continuous process in which children play a relatively passive role. It is also a general approach that is used in a variety of setting including both clinical and educational.
Ivan P.Pavlov is Russia’s most famous scientist. He had discovered “conditioning” For Pavlov, all behavior was reflexive. But how do such behaviors differ the behavior commonly called “instinctive”? Instinctive behavior is sometimes said to be motivated. The animal has to be hungry, to be sexually aroused, or to have nest – building hormones before these kinds of instinctive behavior can occur. At a more abstract level, Pavlov though that all learning, whether of elicited responses in animals or of highly conceptual behaviors in humans, was due to the mechanisms of classical conditioning.
John B. Watson was one of the most colorful personalities in the history of psychology. Although he did not invent Behaviorism, he became widely know as its chief spokesman and protagonist.
It was Watson, more than Pavlov or any other one person, who convinced psychologists that the real explanation of behavior lay in the nervous system and that as soon as we understood the brain a little better, most of the mysteries would disappear. And, it was mainly because of Watson that so many psychologists came to believe that what they called ‘conditioning’ was so important (Bolles)
B.F.Skinner is considered by many authorities to have been the greatest behavioral Psychologist of all time. Earlier behaviorisms has been concerned with stimulus-response connections. Skinner looked at the learning process in the opposite way, investing how learning was affected by stimuli presented after an act was performed. He found that certain stimuli caused the organism to repeat an act more frequently. He called stimuli with this effect the “reinforces”. Watson found that by providing reinforcement in a systematic way one could shape the behavior in desired directions. “Link to Operant”
Trainers have benefited the most from Skinner’s fundamental work in reinforcement as a means of controlling and motivating trainees behavior. Its various applications to training room practice are commonly called “behavior modification”, a technique that many trainers consider to be one of their most valuable tools for improving both learning and behavior of their trainees.
Classical conditioning is demonstrated when a neutral stimulus acquires the eliciting properties of the unconditioned stimulus through pairing the unconditioned stimulus with a neutral stimulus. Behavior is controlled by association.
Operant conditioning is demonstrated when the reinforcing consequences immediately following the response increase its future like hood; aversive consequences immediately following the response to decrease its future likelihood.
In looking for more direct and effective explanation of the development of children’s social behavior, psychologists sparked the emergence of observational learning (or Social Learning Theory). Albert Bandura demonstrated that modeling or observational learning is the basis for a variety of children’s behaviors. He stated that children acquire many favorable and unfavorable responses by simply watching and listening to others around them. A child who kicks other children after he sees it occurs at the babysitter’s house, a student who shaves her hair because her friends did, and the boy who is always late for class because others are , are all displaying there results of observational learning.
Other examples of observational learning include: modeling, imitation, vicarious, learning, identification, copying, social facilitation, contagion, and role play. In studying animal behaviors, the term imprinting is introduced by Lorenz. Imprinting refers to the appearance of complex behaviors apparently as a result of exposure to an appropriate object at critical time. This is demonstrated with newly hatched ducklings which will follow the first moving object they encounter and became attached to it.
Applications: Commonly used applications by a behaviorist include: Positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment, token economy, self management, extinction, shaping, contracts, time out, and systematic desensitization
Applying the concepts: Using Self – Modification to Change Behavior
The Theories and research of the Behaviorist approach gave rise to therapies designed to change behavior by using learning principles. Many of these therapies have been remarkably successful for several trainees who have specific behaviors or habits that they want to alter.
The research paper is based on two main research methodologies which include: Qualitative Research and Quantitative Research.
Firstly, definitions of these methods will be presented. Then, similarities and differences of the qualitative and quantitative research will be identified. Next, their usual distinctions will be discussed in different perspectives, which will be summed up by the implications of the two major researches and conclusion.
To begin with, let us define what is qualitative and quantitative research as to ease the understanding of the forthcoming discussions. Although there are dissimilar definitions by different writers, I have summarized the main points as the followings:
Qualitative Research is commonly not concerned with numbers and entails gathering a great deal of information about a small number of people. The information collected is normally not presentable in numerical form and it is used to understand human’s behaviour and situation (Veal, 1997). Besides, it generally avoid the workings of objective, scientific research (Cunningham, 1999). In addition, it tends to be naturally explanatory, directional and is designed to bring out issues associated with the subject matter as well as trace you in to the best general direction to proceed (Kyle, 2003). Therefore, this research is designed to investigate specific cases to explore individual’s behaviour, experiences or feelings about an issue. Data collection and interpretation proceed in parallel and interact. Usually, it is used to develop hypothesis that may be later subjected to testing through the use of a quantitative questionnaire survey.
Quantitative Research basically involves statistical analysis and relies on numerical evidence to draw conclusions or to test hypothesis. To be reliable, it encompasses large numbers of people and to use computers to analyse the data (Veal, 1997). Furthermore, it is the sort of scientific research with a strict set of rules that govern the use of research (Cunningham, 1999). Also, it is usually designed to be analytical and rigid with statistical accuracy (Kyle, 2003). As a result, it is a research method that data are collected and subsequently analysed. The findings of quantitative research can be verified for accuracy through tests of statistical probability. In general, this research is employed when what is required is a simple count of numbers. For instance, the numbers of people entering a particular attraction or the average spending in a shop or restaurant can be carried out.
In order to conduct an effective research, it is imperative to understand the similarities and differences in between these two methods, since they are useful in different areas.
No matter which kind of research methodology that we are going to use, it is apparent that we will have to define the problem statement and objectives clearly, then we will also need to identify the sources of information that we will require as well as developing the research plan for both researches. Before discussing the details of qualitative and quantitative research methods, it is necessary to understand the fundamental similarities of the above methodologies.
1. Paradigm Knowledge
2. Qualitative Analysis Knowledge
3. Interpretive Framework Knowledge
1. Paradigm Knowledge
2. Statistical Knowledge
3. Substantive Theory Knowledge
In function, those three sources of knowledge in the above table are parallel in both methods. You must first understand the strengths and weaknesses of the research paradigm, afterwards, the knowledge of analysis presumes that you have an awareness of how to analyse the information associated with the chosen paradigm. At last, it is preferable to have an interpretative framework to explain and consolidate the analysis result.
Besides, all qualitative data can be actually measured and coded using quantitative methods and quantitative research can be generated from qualitative inquiries too. For instance, one can code an open-ended interview with numbers that refer to data specific references. Moreover, we can sort respondents’ open-ended answers into major themes and code the data quantitatively, thus, calculate the correlation of the themes or the respondents. In addition, all quantitative analysis is based on qualitative judgments since numbers in and of themselves cannot be interpreted without understanding the assumptions that underlie them. In detail, all numerical information involves numerous judgements about what the numbers means. Another important point is the assumptions of the two paradigms. Despite, there are some fundamental differences, they lie primarily at the level of assumptions about research (epistemological and ontological assumptions) rather than at the level of the data. Apparently, the heart of the quantitative and qualitative debate is theoretical, not methodological. Many qualitative researchers operate under different epistemological assumptions from quantitative researchers. And for some qualitative researchers, the best way to understand what is going on is to become immersed in it. Many qualitative researchers also operate under different ontological assumptions about the world. They do not assume that there is a single unitary reality apart from our perceptions. Since each of us experiences from our own point of view, each of us experiences a different reality.
Next, the analysis of both methods includes three stages, which are: editing, tabulating and interpreting. Similar methods of analysis can be used in both types of researches, for instance, cross tabulation. Furthermore, both sort of analysis involves inferences founded in empirical data as well as both methods of interpretation are made visible to readers through the research design and attempts to be error free. Instead of either ignoring or defending a particular research paradigm, it is possible and more instructive to see both methods as part of a continuum of research techniques, all of which are appropriate depending on the research objective. Also, both qualitative and quantitative methods may be used appropriately with any research paradigm. Questions of method are secondary to questions of paradigm, which we define as the basic belief system that guides the investigator (Guba & Lincoln, 1989).
The major difference between qualitative and quantitative research stems from the researcher’s underlying strategies. On one hand, quantitative research is viewed as confirmatory and deductive in nature by using data to test the theories. In contrast, qualitative research is considered to be explanatory and inductive through gathering the data and leaning what is happening from the data, hence, generating theories. In qualitative research, a hypothesis is not needed to begin research. Yet, all quantitative research requires a hypothesis before research can begin. Grounded theory refers to an inductive process (Qualitative) of generating theory from data, ground-up or bottom up processing, but quantitative relies upon the priori assumptions about the world.
While quantitative research is being more objective, qualitative research tends to have more subjective interpretation and mass detail for later analysis. Moreover, procedure is emphasized in quantitative study, replication and other tests of reliability become easier. Nevertheless, the measures of qualitative research may be taken to make research more reliable within the particular study, such as observer training, objective checklist and so on.
Additionally, there are extreme differences in generalizability for the two paradigms too. For qualitative, the majority of results do not extend much further than the original subject pool whereas quantitative results do. The sampling methods of qualitative research (smaller sampling size when compare with quantitative) determine the extent of the study’s generalizability as well as the quota and purposive sampling strategies are used to broaden the generalizability.
In addition, the major disparity between qualitative and quantitative research deals with the underlying assumptions about the role of the researcher. In quantitative research, the researcher is ideally the neither objective observer who neither participates in nor influences what is being studied. In qualitative research, however, it is thought that the researcher can learn the most by participating and, or being immersed in a research situation. These basic underlying assumptions of both methodologies guide and sequence the types of data collection methods employed.
The following highlights of the qualitative and quantitative methods in different dimensions (i.e. characteristics, data collection, instrument, process, validity and data analysis) are based on the usual distinctions of the methodologies only, which mean that these distinctions are not entirely discrete.
² Explanatory & Exploratory Research
² Subjective & Multiple Reality
² Right brain-oriented
² Confirmatory & Conclusive Research
² Objective & Singular Reality
² Left brain-oriented
² Researcher interacts
² Value-laden & biased Facts
² Researcher is independent
² Value-free & unbiased Facts
² Use of expressive language
² Scientific & Objective
² Critical Theorist
² Time Consuming
² Natural Setting as source of data
² Experimental Setting
Table 3: Data Collection of Qualitative & Quantitative Research
² Case Studies
² Ethnographic Studies
² Phenomenological studies
² Human Observation
² Mechanical Observation
² Non-numerical(with words / pictures)
² In-depth / ‘rich’/ perceptual data
² Individual Behaviour
² Desired information focus on participants’ perspectives, meaning, but can be guided by interviewer
² Specific Coverage of Population
² Within a broad social science framework
² Numerical(with numbers)
² Less detailed / Top line data
² Interval & ratio measurement
² Desired information collected determined by researcher
² General Coverage of Population
² Within Neoclassical economics scope of area
² Group Interviews / Focus Group
² In-depth Interviews
² Participant / Direct Observation
² Street Survey
² Telephone / Fax Survey
² Mail / Online / Site Survey
² Household / Self Administered Survey
² Researcher as key instrument of data collection
² Trained Moderator / Interviewer
² Checklist of guidelines that can be amended
² Transcript, Video, tape
² Psychometric instrument
² Survey & Pilot Test
² Interviewer / Respondent Completion
² Designed & schedule questions that should be followed
² Open-ended Questions
² Pre-coded / Open-ended Questions
Table 5: Process of Qualitative & Quantitative Research
² Mutual Simultaneous shaping of factors
² Cause & Effect(Causation of the relationship)
² Emerging Design – Categories identified during research process
² Static Design – Categories isolated before the study
² Development of patterns & theories for understanding
² Evolutionary, ongoing process of data analysis, collection and hypothesis formation
² No specific independent variable
² Generalizations leading to prediction, explanation and understanding
² Pre-planned, Separate process of data analysis, collection and hypothesis formation
² Independent variable is controlled & manipulated
² Active involvement of researcher
² Passive involvement of researcher
In my opinion, to understand the specific differences of these research techniques is not the most imperative, but to highlight and grasp the existence of a range of options under both methods are more noteworthy. Besides, there is a need to recognize that both quantitative and qualitative techniques can and should co-exist as potential tools of the research trade. Instead of justifying the less highly regarded method, efforts should focus on understanding why and when to use which method, or both. That both forms are rather independent of methodology does not imply that they are equally useful for any topics or intentions of research. For psychological, social and cultural exploration qualitative data, in general, are particularly suitable as they reproduce complex relations and communicate meaning. This is also why they are so successful in everyday communication. On the other hand, quantitative research is appreciated when conducting numerical researches, because of its ability to provide statistical evidences.
Obviously, careful review of the full spectrum of both major research paradigms will confirm that both methods can be used in less “usual” ways. Consequently, it is possible to quantitatively describe observable events in the real world and to collect qualitative evidence within pre-specified, experimental situations. Alongside recognizing that both methods can be used in these “unusual” ways, it is also important to remember that both methods contain many different approaches. For example, grounded theory and case study are different approaches than those of ethnography or phenomenology, and yet all four approaches are essentially qualitative. The same sort of distinctions apply to quantitative approaches: all trials are not identical in design and therefore use differing techniques for measuring results, and there are many different forms of experimental, quasi-experimental and pre-experimental designs, using equally varied quantitative analyses.
Last but not least, it is actually possible to apply the best parts of each research method and then mixing it together to compensate the weaknesses of a mono-paradigm, which is globally interested recently. Through the simultaneous mixing approaches, the research results can be improved.
For my research into Marks & Spencer, I will be conducting several different kinds of methods to gather my data. My research will include both primary and secondary data. Therefore, my answers will be accurate and reliable.
Primary information is the process of gathering information directly from people within your target market. I shall be gathering data from the market by means of conducting an anonymous questionnaire. A questionnaire contains several advantages: –
Through the questionnaire I can construct my questionnaire to suit the needs of fulfilling my research objectives.
A questionnaire contains up-to-date answers from the employee’s.
Through the questionnaire I can also understand the state of mind the worker is in and how he feels about working within M&S.
The questionnaire will be distributed among staffs in Marks & Spencer Westfield branch. They will then fill it in and return it back to me. I have decided to use this method because it is honest and will be unbiased. It is reliable and will be of present and true facts. It is also a good idea because it is anonymous and employees won’t feel pressured into giving answers. I will be handing out questionnaires to 30 people in cluster of simply food in Westfield branch.
This is when I would select employees within Marks & Spencer and ensure they are all treated equally in the questionnaire selecting process. A successful random sample is one which:
Picks names at random from a register process…e.g. every 50th name.
Send an interviewer to each worker within the M&S and question him.
This is when you’re- selecting interviewees in proportion to their age within the branch. This allows the interviewer (which would be me) to question whoever he sees in the office room, as long as the correct quota is achieved.
Only those with certain characteristics are to be interviewed. Eg: I am going to only interview managers within Marks & Spencer worldwide. This means I am interviewing individuals at random.
This is sampling only within a certain area, such as university towns or certain business districts. It is usually used for students such as me who are doing projects on a large scale.
Therefore, I have decided that the sample that I will be conducting is Cluster Sampling. This is because my sample size was 13 employees and is only referring to the simply food of M&S Westfield branch, and not the rest of the company.
Marks and Spencer, a UK based multinational company have grown from a penny bazaar in the late 1880’s to become one of the largest and most well known organizations of British culture. As a leading retailer with a customer base of 10 million per week in over 300 UK stores, and also trades in 30 countries worldwide, producing a Group turnover in excess of £8 billion (www.marksandspencer.com/thecompany). M&S have to be able to manage its resources to meet the customers’ needs and those of the market. Following three years of declining profits, the company has attempted to rejuvenate itself. Though the company is regaining market share and profits are beginning to rise they are still suffering some problems which have resulted in the company selling some of their foreign subsidiaries to concentrate on their core business.
To provide Marks & Spencer with a report that recommends improvement to performance management and retention.
To assess the benefit, if any provided by Marks & Spencer for its employees.
To select appropriate performance criteria for the measurement of staff performance.
Examine and analyze employee perception of the current training provision.
Examine and evaluate other factors that may influence staff motivation
In order to manage the performance of staff managers I will be using performance criteria. This is a handy measuring tool, which is used as a method by which I will be assessing people’s performance and the satisfactions and dissatisfactions of their work. I will also be assessing the performance criteria of their absenteeism and the number of days staff are absent in a period of time.
Also I will be checking on productivity and the number of staff measured against output. I will be monitoring the retention rates data and to see how long staffs have worked, whether they are temporary or permanent.
Out of the thirty questionnaires that I handed out among the staff, only thirteen questionnaires were sent back to me. After receiving the questionnaires, I went about analyzing each question and breaking them down in terms relating to the aim. All answers that were multiple choices, I ensured that I amalgamated the answers and I created pie charts to visually show my answers. Where questions have a ‘long hand’ answer I will be using ‘verbatim’. This is when I will be lifting relevant comments from the answers. The way I have done this is to pick out key messages and repeated statements within the answers and to then summarize it.
Out of thirteen questionnaire, six male staff and rest of seven was female. In my observation, in Westfield branch most of the staffs are female. According to the Elton Mayo, after 5 year period he observed, productivity in the group rose to the highest levels. In the end he realized that firstly:
the women felt important because they had been singled out
the women had developed good relationships between each other and had been
allowed to set their own work patterns
the case of relationship had made for a much more pleasant working environment
What employees wrote
A) Poor 0
B) Below Average 2
C) Average 4
D) Above Average 7
E) Excellent 0
Out of the thirteen that answered, the majority of workers currently employed at M&S said in their questionnaire that as an employer, they rated M&S as average. I have constructed a pie chart to show the data above for question one:
The employees have answered this question vaguely and were not afraid to point out that ‘M&S training is bad’ and that it is ‘so boring’. One employee even said that he ‘can’t remember’ the last course he had attended. This goes to show that M&S need to invest in making their training courses more innovative and enjoyable for their workers in order to keep them motivated. They could ensue team working in the courses meaning placing workers who haven’t worked together before or are not in the same social circle as that particular worker into a group, switching their tasks around and discussing ways of them working more effectively. Team working, managed effectively, can provide employees better quality and more innovative work at a lower cost and at a faster rate. To achieve such improvements in performance employees must be involved. They must have the ability to contribute and feel they are listened to. Greater participation can help a company like M&S gain a competitive edge. Although this may be expensive, the outcome may be fruitful. The workers may leave the course happier and wanted and therefore work harder and produce more business for M&S.
What employees wrote
A) Poor 2
B) Below Average 1
C) Average 6
D) Above Average 4
E) Excellent 0
Most of the employees at the branch rated training as only average. I discussed this topic in more detail in question three and discussed the different approaches that could be taken. Even if changes were implemented correctly, I would hope that if I was to ask the same question to staff in six months, the majority might answer that training is Excellent. Below is a pie chart, which I created to show my results from question four:
Nine out of the thirteen that answered said that the salary they are on is what keeps them motivated. There were no other factors involved in keeping the staff happy. Three workers said that they survive by motivating themselves and only one claimed that he was there only to do a job. Three things influence the motivation of staff in practice:
The company culture.
Its approach to managing its people
The financial reward systems.
Company culture means the accepted set of attitudes and habits within an organization-its ethos. Every business has its own culture, and M&S is no different. Elton Mayo was a motivational theorist who pointed out that the difference in attitude was often to do with the unofficial leader or leaders of the staff concerned. For the majority of the workers, it is the financial reward system that keeps them motivated. One of the managers at the branch explained to me that each of his sales team has a PRP (performance-related pay) scheme to follow. It is a highly attractive system for encouraging staff to work towards the organization’s objectives. The usual method is:
At the end of each month, the individual’s achievement is discussed against the targets set.
If they have reached a target or gone above it, they are rewarded with a pay rise, or are given a bonus scheme to work to.
Most of the employee’s answered this question with mixed answers. After reading each answer I realized that it was roughly a 50/50 outcome. Some of the employees saw themselves with a future at M&S, while others thought that they deserved to be elsewhere. A lot of factors can depend on whether or not an employee has a future at M&S. The outcome I have come to is that the reason the question was not answered properly was because I didn’t ask the question correctly. What I should have I asked was Where do you see yourself in two years time? That way, I will be getting a more detailed answer from the employee and he/she will give me a clear idea of what they think lays in their future. Here is a pie chart to represent the data:
A pie chart representing whether or not
employees see a future for themselves at M&S
The number of
employees that see
themselves with a
future at M&S.
The number of
at M&S for
As you can see from the graph, 54% of the staff saw themselves with a future and 46% saw themselves leaving M&S.
Out of the thirteen employees, nine answered that they are happy with their salary compared to other supermarket. M&S “on the whole, pays fair wages.” One worker said “there is always room for improvement” showing that although they are being paid well, more money is always better.
Referring back to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, if the pay levels were increased, it can be used as an incentive to ensure that they remain at store. Maslow believed everyone has the same needs- all of which can be organized as a hierarchy. When employees earn enough to satisfy these needs, however their motivating power slowly disappears. Maslow then referred to his ‘hierarchy of needs’ in order for them to remain motivated:
A pie-chart to show whether or not employees are
paid a fair wage compared to the supermarket market.
Agree they are
paid a fair wage.
Are not happy
with their current
More employees said that managers are effective within the branch, although those that weren’t happy, had a lot to criticize. One worker said that managers “should be more hands on.” The question that came to my attention is What is an effective manager? There are several explanations to this question, and I am going to explain it by means of McGregor’s Theory X and Y. This comes from Douglas McGregor who identified two styles of management. Theory X managers tend to distrust their employees; they believe they don’t really enjoy their work and that they need to be controlled. In McGregor’s own words, many managers believe “The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can.” This theory is not about workers, but he is actually talking about the managers themselves. Theory X in other words is how managers view their workforce. On the other hand, Theory Y managers are more likely to involve employees in decisions and give them greater responsibility. The managerial assumptions identified by McGregor X and Y are:
“The capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of imagination, ingenuity and creativity in the solution of organisational problems is widely, not narrowly, distributed in the population.”
“The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but to seek responsibility.”
“Commitment to objectives is a function of the rewards associated with their achievement.”
It is clear that manager at the branch is a theory Y manager in some aspects as he is inclined to adopt a democratic leadership style. Their style is to delegate authority to meet specific objectives. Theory X style is to be self-fulfilling. Lazy people are obviously going to produce less output then a lively person. The way to make that lazy person lively is to offer him an incentive, which will motivate him to work harder.
The employees answered and voiced their opinions to make the working environment of M&S better. The question was answered in detail and I was happy with the result.
Eight employees said that they’d recommend friends to work for M&S, one of them saying what I needed to read, “Higher starting salary compared to other small supermarkets.” The answers show that it was mixed opinions and there could be several reasons. Workers may not want to mix business with pleasure and therefore for friends to be around them in the office, their performance can severely decrease.
This study was to provide a review on the different literature on motivation theories. It can be seen that extensive studies have evolved over time on this topic, but in order to progress, work motivation needs to be researched from further new perspectives with changing times. Employees must learn to work together towards common goals and must have an understanding of the organization culture as a whole and how they fit into the big picture. Management must show the employee the need for their being, output and input. The top to bottom role should be fair and there must be a clear code of corporate ethics. There must be communication between all levels, top down and bottom up. Management should ensure that their employees feel secure and they can be trusted and are equals among their peers. Thus, motivation today is about empathy, understanding, recognition and sharing values at the work place thereby resulting in high performance.
The behaviorism theory is the one of the best learning method. Various steps are involved in developing a technology of training. The features of this approach are perhaps particularly significant in terms of the potential contribution each offers to the improvement of training. Emphasis on defining training objectives in behavioral terms and particularly attempts to define complex behaviour in terms of its simple constituent elements. Appropriate training strategies in terms of interactions between trainee’s capabilities and subject matter characteristics. Assessing the effectiveness of training in terms of the results is actually achievement. I conclude that training is not always the answer , and when it is the answer, it has to be the right training .
I designed all questions to find out exactly what the staff is thinking about motivation and training in Westfield branch and also it is newly opened branch newly opened shopping center, staffs quite new if compare to other high street branches. I am very glad that I got my answer what I wanted and they answered questionnaire with honest. This questions was answered in a way that it was being critical of the managers and mocking their intelligence. One of the staff said that the managers give “support rather than motivation”. Support and motivation are two totally different things. Support is when the manager doesn’t literally do the work for an employee, but rather sets the framework for what is to happen. Motivation is when a manager would encourage his employee’s to do something by means of offering them incentives. For most of the answers given in the questions it is plain to see that employee’s don’t feel they get the right motivation that they feel is deserved. Most managers assume they understand human motivation when in practice they have never studied it. As a result they may underestimate the potential within their own staff. Or unthinkingly cause resentments that fester. The process of managing people takes place in every part of every organization. By contrast a few people would need to know the financial concept of gearing in their working lives. So lack of knowledge of motivational theory is particularly unfortunate and has exceptionally widespread effects. In this case, ignorance leads to managers to ignore motivation altogether. They tell themselves that control and organization are their only concerns. Other managers may see motivation as important, but fail to understand its subtleties. For these reasons, I can state that there is a case for saying that the concepts of motivation are that of the important factors in running a business.
Below you will find that I have broken down my questionnaire into an easier way to understand. I completed this before I began my analysis and this can be referred back to as a backup for my analysis at anytime:
B) Below Average
D) Above Average
1) “Offer courses to suit both employee and employer”
2) “2 months ago”
3) “6 months ago”
4) “May-June 2008”
6) “M&S training is bad”… “So Boring”
7) “6 months ago”
9) “June 2008”
10) “5 or 6 months ago”
11) “Can’t remember”
12) “One week ago”
13) “Probably nearly a year”
B) Below Average
D) Above Average
3) “Daily challenges, monthly income” i.e.: – Salary
4) “Proving myself that I can achieve and succeed in new areas making a
Career for myself”
5) “The money” i.e.: – Salary
7) “Achievement” “Self-motivated”
8) “Promotion within store, Bonus and pay income”
9) “Package for staff and worse elsewhere”
10) “Money, recognition”
11) “Pay Day” i.e.: -Salary
12) “Salary”… “Job Satisfaction”
13) “Have a job to do”
1) “In a whole different department” Yes
3) Yes “no opportunities appear to be limited”
1) Yes “in comparison to high st shops”
4) Yes “on the whole, pays fair wages. I can’t comment on the other supermarkets.”
6) “Yes, you should do more than you are paid, AND M&S does pay well.”
7) “Yes, There is always room for improvement.”
8) “Average, however I know there are staff on a lower grade who earn more
than I do.”
12) “No, our salaries are based on a 40 hour week.”
13) “Yes…there should be profit sharing and quarterly bonus as well.”
1) No ‘Not people to be inspired or motivated by’
4) Yes ‘there are effective managers, certain parts of their role.’
6) No ‘should be more hands on… should be available to staff and clients’
8) Yes ‘management team has progressed into their positions.’
9) ‘50/50’ neutral anomaly
10) No ‘Some people are not right for the job.’
11) Yes ‘involve themselves more.’
13) No ‘some are almost effective, some are not at all.’
1) ‘Friendlier’ environment.
2) ‘Extra staff’ i.e. job recruitment.
3) ‘Better pay’ ‘Invest more funds into branches’ i.e. DIY
4) ‘For managers to motivate staff in meetings, not de-motivate’.
5) ‘Manager more available to staff and customers’
6) ‘Technology’ IT ‘Bad customer service i.e. only one
8) ‘Technology’ IT
9) ‘Invest in IT’ ‘launch
10) ‘Listen to staff.’ ‘Team environment’ needed.
11) ‘Stop raising targets + removing staff’ ‘finish jobs/DIY’ in branches.
12) More money in branches e.g.: Space and air conditioning system
13) ‘Better benefits, availability of managers for customers and staff’
13) Yes ‘Higher starting salary compared to high street shops’
1. Unsatisfied need
2. Employee faces tension and explores options that will satisfy their needs
3. Employee acts in with goal directed behavior. Driving force
Reduction of tension
4. Employee performance for search behavior
[Source: The Motivation Process. Adapted from Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, and Applications, (Robbins 1993, p.206)]
• In 1900s, traditional form of motivation “Be tough”
• In 1938, Chester Barnard introduced “Be good”
• In 1947, Max Weber introduced “Bureaucracy”
• In 1955, Joan Woodard set proposed the relationship between the two forces.
o Bureaucracy for routine tasks, interpersonal process for non-routine operations
• In 1968, Bennis and Slater proposed “Human relation”
• In 1980s, many gurus introduced “Total Quality Management” (TQM)
• In 1990s, “Reengineering” and “Redesign” work process
• Beyond “TQM” and “Reengineering”, SATISFYING YOUR CUSTOMERS. How? Friendship, Work and Respect
[Source: Reis, D. and Pena, L. 2001, “Reengineering the motivation to work” Management Decision, vol.39, no.8, pp.666-675.]
[Source: Ivancevich, Szilegyi and Wallace 1977, p. 112]
Ambramowicz, G. (1999). ‘ Performance management at Optus Communications’, O’Neill, G & Kramar, right (eds), Australian Human Resources Management Vol. 2, Woodsland Pty Ltd, Warriewood, NSW, 1999, pp. 61-8
Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. (1998). Performance Management: The New Realities, London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
Bredrup, H. (1995). Performance Management: A Business Process Benchmarking Approach, Chapman & Hall, London.
Campbell, J. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M.D.Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
De Cieri, H & Kramar, R. (2002). Human Resource Management in Australia: Strategy People Performance. McGraw-Hill, Australia.
DeSimone,R., Werner, J., & Harries, D. (2002). Human Resource Development, 3rd Edition. Thomson, United States
Gettler, L. (2000). ‘New Economy unearths hidden asset – Human Capital’. The Age, 2 June 2000, p. 5.
Hartle, F. (1995). How to Re-engineer your performance Management Process. London: Kogan Page.
Mclnerney, M. (2000). ‘ The AMP Story: Going global with performance management’. HR Monthly, May 2000, p. 20.
Performance Management Study Guide. (2004). Central Queensland University.
Robbins, S., Bergman, R., Stagg, I & Coulter, M. (2000). Management, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Australia.
Robbins, S., Waters-Marsh, T., Cacioppe, R. & Millett, B. (2001). Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies and Applications: Australia and New Zealand. Prentice Hall, Sydney.
Sofo, F. (1999). Human Resource Development. Business & Professional Publishing. Worriedwood, Australia.
Williams, R.(2002). Managing Employee Performance: Design and Implementation in Organizations. Thomson Learning, London.
Billsberry J. (1996) The Effective Manager Perspectives and Illustrations, The
Cromwell Press Ltd, Wiltshire, page 6
Veron M.D. (1986) Human Motivation, The University Printing House, Cambridge,
Amabile, T.M. 1993, ‘Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace’, Human Resource Management Review, vol. 3, no.3, pp. 185-201.
Barnard, C.I. (1938), The functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Berl, R.L. and Williamson, N.C. 1987, ‘A review of the content teories of motivation as they apply to sales and sales management’, American Business Review, Volume 33, pp.53-64.
Cully M., Dix G., O’Reilly A. & Woodland S. 1999, Britain at work: as depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, Routledge.
Di Cesare, J. and Sadri, G. 2003, ‘Do all carrots look the same? Examining the impact of culture on employee motivation’, Management Research News, vol. 26, no.1, pp.29-40.
Grigaliunas, B. and Weiner, Y. 1974, ‘Has the Research Challenge to Motivation-Hygiene Theory Been Conclusive? An Analysis of Critical Studies’, Human Relations, Vol. 27, Issue 2.
House, T. J. and Wigdor, L. A. 1967, ‘Herzberg’s Dual Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction and Motivation’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 20,
Luthans, F. and Stajkovic, A. D. 1999, Reinforce for performance: The need to go beyond pay and even rewards, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 49-57.
Locke, E. A. and Latham, G.P. 1990, ‘Work Motivation and Satisfaction: Light at the End of the Tunnel’, Psychological Science, Vol. 1 Issue 4, pp.240-246.
McKenna, T. 2002, ‘Motivating the front line’, National Petroleum News, Vol. 94, Issue 11, p.18.
McKenna, T. 2005, ‘How to recognize good job performance’, National Petroleum News, Vol. 97, Issue 2, p.16.
Miner, J. B. and Dachler, H. P. 1973, ‘Personal attitudes and motivation’, University of Maryland, College Park
Mitchell, T. R. 1982, ‘Motivation: New direction for theory, research, and practice’. Academy of Management Review, Volume 81, No. 5.
Mullins L. J. 1996, Management and Organisational Behaviour, 4th Edition, Pitman Publishing.
Nelson, D. & Quick, J. 1994, Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and Challenges, West Publishing Company.
Nemerov, D.S. 1993, “Motivating and creating harmony in the call center”, Telemarketing, Vol.11, Issue. 8, pp. 53 – 57.
Nowlin, W.A. 1982, ‘Factors That Motivate Public and Private Sector Managers: A Comparison’, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp.224-227.
Quick, T. L. 1988, ‘Expectancy theory in five simple steps’, Training and Development Journal, Vol.11, pp.30-32.
Ramlall, S. 2004, ‘A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations’, The journal of American Academy of Business, Vol.27, Issue 5, pp.52-63.
Reis, D. and Pena, L. 2001, “Reengineering the motivation to work” Management Decision, Vol.39, no.8, pp.666-675.
Robbins, S. P. 2003, Organizational Behaviour, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Smith, L. B. 2005, ‘More than motivation’, T & D, Volume 59, no.10, pp.22-23
Wahba, M. A. and Bridwell, L. G.1967, ‘Maslow Reconsidered: A Review of Research on the Need Hierarchy Theory’, Organisational Bahaviour and Human Performance , Vol. 20, pp.5-14.
Weber, M. 1947, The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations, translated by Talcott Parsons and A.M. Henderson, Free Press, New York.
Woodward, J. (1965), Industrial Organizations: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London.
Wright, T.A 2003, ‘What Every Manager Should Know: Does Personality Help Drive Employee Motivation’, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp.131-133.
Andreasen, N.C. (1984). The Broken brain, The biological revolutionin PsychiatryNew York: Harper and Row.
Bartram,S. & Gibson,B(2000) The training Needs Analysis Toolkit, 2 nd ed Amherst, MA:HRD Press, Inc.
Bellak, A. S. & Hersen, M. (1986). Dictionary of behavior therapy techniques. New York: Pergamon Press.
Brooks, J 1995 Training and Development Competence: a practical guide Kogan Page, London.
Bolles, R.C. (1979). Learning Theory.(2nd ed.) New York: Holt,Rinhart, and Winston.
Burns, R. 1995 The adult learner at work Business and Professional Publishing, Sydney.
Burns, S. 1995 ‘Rapid changes require enhancement of adult learning’ HRMonthly June, pp 16-17.
Gupta.K(1999). A Practical Guide to Needs Assessment. Sna Francisco: Jossey Bass/Pfeiffer
Hall, E. (1983). Psychology today: An introduction (5th ed.). NewYork: Random House.
Hetherington, E. M. & Parker, R. D. (1986). Child psychology:A contemporary viedwpoint. (3rd ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Hintzman, D.L. (1977). The Psychology of learning and memory. New York: Freeman.
Knowles, M.S. 1978 The Adult Learner: a Neglected Species 2nd edition, Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, Book Division.
Knowles, M.S. 1990 The Adult Learner: a Neglected Species 4th edition, Houston: Gulf Publishing Company, Book Division
Laird, D. 1985 Approaches to training and development Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
LeFrancois, G. R. (1982). Psychology for teaching (4th ed.).Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing company.
Liebert, R. M., Poulos, R. W. & Marmor, G. S. (1977). Developmentalpsychology, (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Martin, G. L., & Pear, J. (2002). Behavior Modification: What It Is and How to Do It, 7th ed. New York: Prentice-Hall.
McGill, I & Beaty, L 1995 Action Learning, second edition: a guide for professional, management and educational development Kogan Page, London.
Psychology today: An introduction (3rd ed.). (1975). NewYork: Random House Publishing.
Pogson, P. & Tennant, M. 1995 ‘Understanding Adults’ in Foley, G. ed. Understanding adult education and training, St Leonards, Allen & Unwin, pp.20-30.
Rosner, R(1999,May). Training is the answer….. but what was the question? Workforced,78, 42-50
Salamon,L.M (1999).America’s Nonprofit Sector: A Primer. New York : Foundation Center
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
Vernon, A. (1993). Counseling children and adolescents. Denvor, CO: Love Publishing Company.
Zastrow, C. & Kirst-Ashman, K. K. (1974). Understanding humanbehavior and the social environment. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Dunn.L. (2002). Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series. Available: https://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/2_learntch/theories.html. Last accessed 2 Deember 2007
Stacey.S. (2007). Keys to Sucessful Training : Linking learning through the senses".Available: https://hrshopperblog.typepad.com/hrshopperblog/2007/01/keys_to_success.html. Last accessed 01Dec 2007.
Reference for methodology Blythe,J.(2001). Essentials of Marketing(2nd ed) England: Pearson Education Limited.
Cunningham,D.G.(1999) The Difference between Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Research. https://www.learn-usa/res002.htm 20/11/2003
Guba,E.G. & Lincoln,Y.S.(1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications.
McCullough,D.(2003). Quantitative vs. Qualitative Marketing Research. Macro Consulting Inc. https://www.macroinc.com/html/art/s_qua.html 17/11/2003
Veal,A.J.(1997) Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism(2nd ed) England: Pearson Education Limited
ERIC(1999). QUESTION/PROBLEM: Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. https://ericae.net/faqs/qual_qnt.htm 18/11/2003
Billsberry J. (1996) The Effective Manager Perspectives and Illustrations, The
Cromwell Press Ltd, Wiltshire.
Capey J.G and Carr N.R. (1982) People and Work Organizations, Holt, Rinehart and
Winston Ltd, Eastbourne.
Henry J. (1991) Creative Management, J.W. Arrowsmith Ltd,Bristol
Kenny J., Donnelly E., Reid M.(1983) Monopower Training and Development,
Martin’s of Berwick, Great Britain.
Veron M.D. (1986) Human Motivation, The University Printing House, Cambridge
Yeung R. (2000) Coaching People, How To Books Ltd, Oxford,
Allen G. (Accessed 1998) Management Modern. Available from:
McNamara C. (Accessed no date) Basics About Employee Motivation. Available from:
Motivation – FAQs about employee motivation (Accessed no date) Available from :https://www.motivation-abc.com/FAQs_about_employee_motivation.html?gclid=CKPc5cj0iIkCFSBXMAodlVdKjQ.
Unlimited Employee Motivation (Accessed no date). Available from: www.employer-employee.com/motivat.htm.
We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service.Get help with my paper