Affordable Care Act and Universal Healthcare in Sweden

Health care is one of the most controversial topics in American society, today. Countries have opted to form their own health care from being single-payer, two tiered or insurance mandated. Who can say which one is better than the other? In this research paper, I will be doing an in-depth comparison between Sweden's single payer health care plan and the United States' individual mandated plan through the Affordable Care Act. Specifically, this paper will discuss the differences between Sweden and America's health care system, statistics, quality of the care given, and their policies and procedures when it comes to their health care.

Why does the United States not have universal health care? How does Sweden perform with their current health care plan? Is Sweden healthier than the United States? How do the two countries differ in policy? What does the taxation look like for residents in Sweden versus residents in America? What is the overall cost of operation for each system? Which system offers the most coverage to patients? These are just a few of the topics that are needed to fully discuss the differences between these two health care systems.

Sweden has had single-payer, universal health care for sixty-three years, since 1955 (Kanopiadmin, 2013). Meaning that for sixty-three years Sweden has found a way to pay for its nation's health care through resident's taxes and ensure access to quality health care to all who need it (Sampson, 2015). Their residents pay for their own health care and assist those who may not be able to afford health care of their own (Sampson, 2015). Sweden provides health care for a wide range of needs including but not limited to maternal care for expecting mothers, midwives, mental health care, and specific medical specialists (Sampson, 2015). The nation divides the weight of responsibility over three regions of their combined municipalities (Kanopiadmin, 2013). They have a system that seems like it works well but does it really? What do residents think of it?

Swedish Healthcare- Facts

Healthcare in Sweden is idolized by many American people who claim that it is the best system in the world, but is it really? Sweden is a country that is built upon capitalism, much like the United States, but is influenced greatly by socialistic welfare, the idea that the community has a whole should be responsible for itself and others financially (Sampson, 2015). In 2018, Swedish taxpayers paid an average of 61.85% of their personal income to their collecting municipality while the United States only paid 37% of their personal income (Sweden Personal Income Tax Rate, 2018).

This means that due to their high taxation, Sweden's people are paying over half of their income to cover taxes while the United States is only paying 1/3rd of their income. Is this the price for universal healthcare coverage? While Sweden is recognized as having one of the best healthcare systems in the world, it does have a few flaws regardless of cost. While Swedes can afford their healthcare, politicians have yet to figure out how to help residents gain access to healthcare facilities. With a population over 9.07 million, Sweden has a high demand for healthcare but their hospitals have actually reduced the number of beds in their facilities (Sk??l©n, Nordgren,& Annerb?¤ck, 2016). Not only are Swedes now facing the second highest income tax but they are now facing the troubles that come with not having enough room for patients who need to be hospitalized meaning longer waiting lines. How does this compare to the problems America is facing with the Affordable Care Act?

The Affordable Care Act & America- Facts

Healthcare in America is, in my opinion a controversial topic. Everyone has their own opinion of the Affordable Care Act in the American health care system. It is clear that our statistics necessitated a change but has the ACA actually affected our statistics? As with every new concept or idea implemented within the United States government, the Affordable Care Act presented a few mechanical, economic, and social issues (ACA Overview, 2017). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was implemented by President Barack Obama in 2010 (ACA Overview, 2017). According to the ACA Health Care website, the Affordable Care Act provides more affordable healthcare to more Americans. The Affordable Care Act brought more focus to the Iron Triangle of healthcare which consists of cost, quality and access (ACA Overview, 2017). The ACA also brought more awareness to the problems of the current healthcare system. Yet, America still has fewer physicians per person than in most other OECD countries and a lower average of hospital beds per population than almost thirty other countries. In January of 2017 VOX reported that 17 states opted out of expanding their Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act. When the act was first written, it was required that all states must enact the Affordable Care Act, but that was quickly changed due to Medicaid being managed differently in each state (Staff, 2017). Each state has made the decision to enact or refuse ACA for various reasons (Garfield, R., Damico, A., & Orgera, K., 2018) . The ACA has certain provisions that make it required for certain individuals and employers. If those who are required to have coverage under the ACA opt to not file for coverage, they may face certain tax penalties (Garfield, R., Damico, A., & Orgera, K., 2018). A big concern that remained hovering over the ACA change was the national spending and its effect on future spending. It was projected that healthcare spending would reduce but at a slow rate.

Millions of Americans remain uninsured today despite the insurance provided by the Affordable Care Act. Three years after fully implementing ACA, in 2016 it was reported that 27.6 million nonelderly Americans remained uninsured (Kaiser).

The ACA has reduced the number of noninsured Americans but it has not eliminated the group in its entirety. According to the CDC, the uninsured rate has fallen below 10 percent. According to the US Census Bureau, the number of Americans with health insurance was up further to 91.2%.

Some Americans feel that ACA insurance is too expensive so they would rather go uninsured and pay out of pocket. Family Affordable Care Plans vary in pricing depending on many factors. Family size, age of members, location, and income are all factors in the pricing and allocation of ACA. In my opinion, pricing for affordable care is very difficult to understand. One source reports, that the average individual premium is $393 for an individual not receiving subsidies (government funds). The average family premium is $1,021 for a family not receiving subsidies. It is difficult to understand how much of a tax penalty will be given to those who opt out of affordable care. Certain procedures cost more in the United States than any other country, including Sweden (SWE) (Kane, 2012).
In my opinion, these numbers strongly reinforce America's need for better healthcare coverage for all people. To detail the exact coverage of ACA, the act had to undergo a few revisions and was divided into ten titles which draft out the laws of the act. The Affordable Care Act can be difficult to understand but how does the law compare and reflect upon Sweden's universal healthcare system?

Legislation for Sweden's Healthcare and Affordable Care Act

Both countries have heavy legislation concerning healthcare. Ranging from laws concerning pharmaceuticals and overall patient coverage. The major difference between the two countries is the division of coverage. America uses Affordable Care, Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance to insure the American people. Sweden's legislation manly covers patient safety. According to Socialstyrelsen, a Swedish Healthcare Website, all healthcare providers are personally responsible and have legal responsibility for achieving compliance with patient safety regulations and for monitoring their own work between patients and hospitals (Healthcare complaints, n.d.). Socialstyrelsen also states that the Health and Social Care Inspectorate' is the organization which monitors healthcare activities and professionals to ensure that they comply with applicable laws and regulations (Healthcare complaints, n.d.). The Health and Social Care Inspectorate is majorly responsible for health care, public health, social insurance and social issues (Healthcare complaints, n.d.). In 2011, Sweden introduced the Patient Safety Act (2010) which states that health care workers are personally responsible for their own actions (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017). For example, this act would help protect individuals who are harmed or made ill by work related situations which would then be reported to the proper government department which will then determine the course of action to resolve the situation to protect other employees (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017).

Like America, Sweden has legislation that prohibits discrimination based on nationality Sweden also has an equal treatment law which states that all suppliers must have the same access to information (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017). Contrarily, Sweden has legislation which requires suppliers to have transparency when providing information, one that requires proportionality between the contacts and their stated requirements as a supplier (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017). America by comparison has been attempting to perfect healthcare for many years. Medicare and Medicaid are government funded programs which seek to provide health insurance to those who cannot afford it, Medicaid, and the elderly over 65 years of age, Medicare (Mazie, 2018). America has laws to protect workers, expecting mothers, veterans and health care professionals (Health Care Law, n.d). Both Sweden and America have legislation that reinforces patient's safety and privacy through HIPAA (Woods, 2014). The Affordable Healthcare Act of 2010 is a more recent development in America which seeks to provide insurance to all American citizens had to undergo a few revisions and had ten titles established which outlined the specific requirements for users and providers (ACA Overview, 2017). These ten titles address affordable health care for all Americans though affordable coverage, the roles of public programs which focused on expanding Medicaid and CHIP (Childern Health Insurance Program), improving the quality and efficiency of health care, preventing of chronic disease and improving public health, health care workforce, transparency and program integrity, improving access to innovative medical therapies, community living assistance services and supports, and finally revenue provisions strengthening quality, affordable care (ACA Overview, 2017) . In my opinion the affordable Care Act was written to cover a wide variety of Americans and it does a great job of ensuring that the needs of those Americans are met by law. While Sweden does not have heavy legislation on healthcare like America, they are monitoring their health care professional through government agencies to ensure optimal patient safety and care (OECD, 2013. While legislation is important, how well have these laws affected how each country spends on health care and compare to each other with other costs?

Sweden and America's Spending

As previously stated, America spends more on healthcare than any other country. The graph below illustrates the healthcare spending compared to forty-four other countries in 2016, six years after the Affordable Care Act was implemented. (Source: OECD Health spending Data)

(Source: The U.S. Spends More Public Money On Healthcare Than Sweden Or Canada, 2017)

America spends more than any other country for private healthcare but actually spends less than two other countries do on public healthcare. While America may be spending more than any other country privately, what are they paying for? America pays more per person for pharmaceuticals than any other country. America also pays its doctors, nurses and specialists more than any other country. The U.S. is also spending more on health care administration than any other country to plan, regulate and manage health systems. In my opinion, this spending gap is due to the high cost of healthcare services and medicine. It costs to have quality care.

( Source: Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014)

Here we see the countries ranked based on various health criteria. America ranks last overall when compared to Sweden who ranks third overall. The U.S only out-ranks Sweden in three categories, overall quality of care, effectiveness of care, and timeliness of care (Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014). America does rank fifth overall in quality of care which speaks strongly to our spending habits in my opinion; while we are spending more our citizens are receiving great care (Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014). I raise the question what good is free universal healthcare if it isn't good, quality healthcare?

Health Statistics Compared

After examining the policy, legislation, facts and spending, how do the two countries differ in success after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act? Statistics such as infant mortality rate, percentage of insured, and effective care. The chart entitled effective care measures depicts different care scenarios and ranks each country based on their care. The U.S. ranks third overall while Sweden is ranked ten out of eleven. This chart was provided by commonwealth in 2014, four years after the Affordable Healthcare Act was implemented. In my opinion one could argue that this proves that ACA helped improve the quality of care in America.

( Source: Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014)
OECD then reported that America has more hospital beds per 1000 in the population than Sweden. In my opinion, this fact also reinforces the effectiveness and quality of America's healthcare.

Conclusion

Sweden may have universal healthcare but residents are taxed heavily and then receive poor quality of care. The Affordable Care Act provides affordable, quality healthcare to those who need it without heavy taxation. There are positive and negative effects to both plans but ultimately health care remains a controversial topic. After observing the facts discussed throughout this paper I, in my opinion, have determined that the taxation is not fair for universal healthcare, the quality of care is poor, policy and procedure is hard to understand, and it is difficult to receive care when you need it. The Affordable Care Act, however, seems to be lowering costs, improving quality of care, heightening the number of citizens insured but healthcare spending is still the highest without the highest of quality. Faults can be found in both parties but overall it is the citizens who inhabit the country who control the system by being an active voter to decide future laws and being educated about current healthcare systems.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Affordable Care Act and Universal Healthcare in Sweden. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Affordable Care Act and Healthcare Business Strategies

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was an extremely significant law passed in regards to federal healthcare policy and business strategies that are driven by those policies. This act made health insurance accessible to all Americans regardless of their pre-existing conditions. This piece of the act alone has already affected healthcare business strategies. This paper will answer the question in detail and explain how the ways the ACA, in some cases, has already affected healthcare business strategies and will continue to affect healthcare business strategies. The ACA will be explored from its beginning, to passage, to implementation. The advantages and disadvantages of ACA will be discussed in relation to impact on healthcare business strategies.

PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the official name of what many commonly refer to as the Affordable Care Act, or also known as Obamacare. It is the comprehensive healthcare reform law in the United States that was enacted in March 2010. The primary three goals of the law were to: make health insurance affordable and accessible to more people, expand Medicaid, and promote lower cost, innovative health care delivery methods (Affordable Care). These three goals have the greatest impact on healthcare business strategies. The purpose for these goals were to make near-universal coverage possible; strengthen quality and consumer cost for coverage; strengthening value, efficiency and care quality while cutting out waste; increasing accountability across systems; empowering community-based preventive care on a long-term scale (Rosenbaum).

IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE BUSINESS STRATEGIES

A strategy is plan for moving advantageously from one point to a future point while navigating risk and resistance. In healthcare, strategy focuses on service, growth, quality, financial capital, and human capital. All good strategies begin with goals and objectives. Regarding healthcare strategies, the goals were already determined by the ACA. Implementation is where strategy will be needed for healthcare businesses dealing with ACA objectives (Beckham).

The enactment of ACA added approximately 46 million individuals to the number of people with insurance coverage in America (Rosenbaum). This increase in patients will impact a healthcare business world that is already suffering to obtain and maintain qualified staff (Morrissey). This lack in workforce also strains quality and efficiency, but it creates opportunity for community-based care to become more accessed, (Rosenbaum) which will be discussed later. To counteract the lapse in workforce, the ACA has also provided incentives for those in healthcare to advance their education or obtain continuing education credits (Morrissey). Training strengthens a business's ability to have a qualified staff. Like many other industries that rely on federal funding, budget cuts in states that did not implement the Medicaid expansions leave shortages unmanaged (How The Affordable).

The ACA extends funding to special populations in an effort to increase preventative health that also lowers the cost of healthcare and eases some of the strain felt from the increase in patients (Rosenbaum). Healthcare care business strategists would do well to collaborate with community organization to receive funding but mainly as an attempt to promote prevention, which is typically more cost effective than treatment (Preventive).

In 2015, the ACA's Value Based Purchasing (VBP) program replaced Sustainable Growth Rate with the passing of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) (Chee et al.). ACA has in a way pushed the healthcare business industry to be more streamlined and technology focused using proven strategies to run the business side of healthcare and measure quality (CAHPS). The third goal of improving healthcare delivery includes quality, efficiency, and accountability. This is achieved through use of multiple metrics such as patient surveys, readmissions, and quality of life (Lazar et al. 2013). It is through these quality measurements, providers are given incentives for care quality. Prior to passage of the ACA, doctors were paid a fee for the services they provided and no consideration was given to the quality of that service. In essence, a person could go in and receive top-notch service and would pay the same fee to a great physician as they would have paid to a physician who was negligent and careless. Another issue that can affect quality is readmissions for noncompliant patients. Quality scores can also suffer from this (Seaborg).In theory, such a practice is not good business, receiving lackluster work but paying a premium price. After ACA, healthcare providers are now receiving incentives for the quality of their work (How Insurance Changes).
The final way the ACA has impacted healthcare business strategies is through improved technology. This technology is used in every level of healthcare to make improvements to business strategies, operations, and procedures (Nemeth et al.). This part ties in with the training incentives to ensure the workforce and training requirements evolve with the technology (Morrissey). This new technology is used to reduce risk and revenue loss (Wang et. al).

CONCLUSION

The Affordable Care Act turned the healthcare industry on its ear. The legislation ushered in a multitude of changes that have revamped an outdated medical industry. With any new legislation, there will be resistance, but the legislation has built in protections against such resistance in the form of penalties. An already struggling healthcare industry cannot undertake penalties for resistance, although some states have chosen to do this with opting out. As of now, the country can appreciate the improvements in care implementation, quality care and service, reduction in wasteful spending and fraudulent claims, streamlined, efficient service delivery, and a growing and continuously improving workforce equipped with the latest medical information technology. With the incentives given to individuals within the healthcare industry, it is highly likely the field will soon have a growth spurt to supplement its current workforce shortages. The ACA seems to be successful in all of its goals, but only time will reveal the full impact it will have on health care business strategies.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Affordable Care Act and Healthcare Business Strategies. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Affordable Care Act (ACA)

Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed by the former president of the United States of America in 2010, and its provisions were majorly favoring the U.S. citizens. It was anticipated that this act would tighten the healthcare system. Some of the provisions of that act include; health prevention and promotion, reductions of care cost, fairness in the treatment of patients, expanded coverage, the establishment of new care models, and Medicare preservation (Rak & Janis, 317). However, the Affordable Care Act has so many disadvantages as compared to the advantages which mean that it should be killed. President Donald Trump should do all he can to put a stop to the affordable care act. ACA was built on conservative principles, healthcare spending in the United States of America is out of reach, the act did not provide mechanisms for controlling drug cost, it has no requirement to cover long-term care, and it does not provide coverage for eye r dental care. For those reasons, the affordable care act should be done with away with. The affordable care act was built on conservative principles where the profit health insurance corporations are kept at the center of health insurance. This system is very inefficient in that; it has high administrative costs and high sales costs or else high marketing costs (Squires et al., 10). The profit health insurance corporations need to shoe continued profit growth, therefore, increasing the costs of healthcare to very high costs so that they can continue making more profits. That is why most people prefer paying the tax than using insurance covers because they feel that the insurance companies are simply exploiting people. It would be much better if the Medicare for all would be more focused on reducing expenses on healthcare. The healthcare system in the United States is very expensive and cannot be compared to any other healthcare system in any other major country. The costs charged by hospitals, doctors for consultations and other healthcare service providers are very high. Despite the high costs charged in the healthcare systems, the services provided are very poor and do not match the health care expenses. Health insurance providers have so much greed that all they care about is the profit but not the wellbeing of its customers. The health of the people should be given the first priority if at all the affordable care act is meant to improve the healthcare systems as it claims. Obamacare should be killed because all it is doing is just exploiting the citizens of the United States. A Medicare for all systems should help to control the costs in healthcare by ensuring that servic3s are provided at reasonable fees. The affordable care act does not provide a mechanism to control the cost of drugs. Drugs are a very important requirement in healthcare. Once someone has been diagnosed with a certain illness, they need drugs to help in healing. However, Obamacare does not provide a mechanism that can be used to control the cost of drugs. The drugs are so expensive for Medicare patients hence making the system very inefficient (Squires et al., 13). People are finding it very costly to buy drugs. Obamacare does not have a requirement to cover long-term care. Long-term care is highly needed by elderly people. Their segment of the elderly people in the U.S. is growing and they need a long-term care because mostly old age comes with long-term illnesses which need long-term attention. The affordable care act neglects those who might need long-term health care. It is therefore not efficient for all. It should care for all people regardless of their illness. Long-term illnesses are very costly to cure and therefore the system should treat such an issue as a priority. That is why the affordable care act should just be abolished because it does not care for all. Another reason why the affordable care act should just be killed is that it does not provide cover for eye and dental care. Most of the people in the United States feel that the costs for dental and eye care are very high and such illnesses can be very serious. Dental and eye issues should be addressed with urgency whenever they occur because they are very serious and painful but people do not receive good care for the same because the costs are very high and they are not covered by the insurance. Obamacare should not assume dental and eye care because people suffer a lot when paying for dental and eye care. Generally, the affordable care act benefits the health insurance providers and not the citizens of the United States of America as it is supposed to be. The insurance providers are just aimed at making more profits without looking at the welfare of their customers. It is so unfortunate that the affordable care act is proving hard to kill because of the small benefits it has but it would better if it is eliminated.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Affordable Care Act (ACA). (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The Accomplishments of Susan B. Anthony

The world as we know it wasn't always so full of benefits and opportunities. Of course, excluding the issues and dilemmas. Do you ever stop and think about how society and the world got to what it is today? Particularly with the change and development of women's rights? One thing is certain. If it wasn't for one of the greatest contributors who devoted themselves to the cause of bettering the lives of women, we wouldn't be living in the same society we are living in now. Susan B. Anthony changed the entirety of women's roles, from jobs and images/depictions to political involvement. That's why I admire all she's done to shift the immense gender inequality of our country. Her efforts made one of the greatest impacts, if not the greatest, for the rights of women and what they're allowed to do. Susan B. Anthony's admirable role in women's activism was foreshadowed by her early life. She learned to read and write at the age of three, went to a school, and then onto being a teacher at a female academy (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica). Very rarely did women go to school in the 1800s, so it was in some way a sign of what she would go on to do in the future. Soon after moving to New York, she began the women's suffrage movement. Despite being reprimanded and slandered by newspapers, she continued with her direction into women's rights advocacy, helping and influencing many along the way. From there on she went to achieve the milestones that I praise and appreciate her for. One of the greatest things that Anthony achieved was gaining the right to vote for all women. This action changed the role of women in politics immensely because they could finally voice their opinions in the presidential elections as well as any other election for that matter. She did this by first drafting the 19th Amendment in 1878 (5 Important Facts About Susan B. Anthony). Then, fourteen years after her death when the Amendment was ratified, women were granted the right to vote. She fought hard for this right considering she even got arrested for illegally voting. Anthony even denied paying the charges. I think it's something she should be applauded for because if she had never been brave enough to stand up for what she believed was right, women may have never gotten the privilege to vote. Susan B. Anthony didn't just fight for women to have the right to vote. She also fought for their right to own property. She campaigned for women's property rights in 1853 (National Susan B. Anthony Museum & House). Anthony did everything, including gathering petition signatures, speaking at meetings, and influencing the state legislature (National Susan B. Anthony Museum & House). Her efforts made a huge difference because, in 1860, a law was passed allowing married women to not only own property but also have custody of their children and keep their earnings. It's a given that this was a massive milestone for the development of society and gender equality. Not everyone would go to great lengths for the improvement of women in society. Susan B. Anthony made major changes to our society for the better by achieving more freedom and rights for women. She changed some of the patriarchal aspects of our country by putting the law that allows women to vote into motion. Susan B. Anthony also allowed for women who were married to own property. Our society would be very different from what it is today if it wasn't for her efforts. Altogether, I believe Susan B. Anthony is admirable for her strong determination in attaining gender equality among everyone and had a positive and drastic impact on the world.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The Accomplishments of Susan B. Anthony. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Wiesel’s Speech and Susan B. Anthony’s

This essay will discuss two speeches “Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, and “On Women is right to Vote” by Susan B. Anthony. The difference between Elie Wiesel’s speech and Susan B. Anthony’s is lack of equal right where as Elie Wiesel’s is about WWII and the lack of humanity that existed during that time. The similarities between these two speeches and events are indifference or lack of concern or action, in both cases these events happened due to lack of concern for parties when it didn’t directly affect them. The nation had a lack of concern for those fighting for their lives in Europe for many years, as did men about women’s right to vote, many did not seem to care that women’s rights were not being exercised.

“Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment.” (Wiesel,1999). In both cases it seems that people ignored the problems until it got to the point where it could not be ignored anymore, when a woman had to do something illegal at the time to make a point to be heard and get results, and millions had to die before something was done in Europe. Susan B. Anthony discusses how that the government was hateful towards women as well as the poor. “The most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. (Anthony, 1872). Elie Wiesel also discusses how the governments failed those in Europe and instead focused on the rich rather than the poor.

As Mr. Elie Wiesel said, “It is so much easier to look away from victims. It is so much easier to avoid such rude interruptions to our work, our dreams, and our hopes.” (Wiesel,1999). Both speeches show the world what the consequences of ignoring a traumatic event that are occurring, we have learned as a nation that ignoring a situation is not the answer, we must nip problems in the bud and face them head on. Each of these stories tells us that it is not okay to sweep things under the rug when it doesn’t directly involve us because they can easily be taken to a point where people are hurt or even killed.

Another similarity was the strength in their speech as well as their strength of character. They were not silenced and were heard when many forces fought to silence them. This force was indifference and hatred. Without this strength and determination, we would not be where we are today when it comes to Human Rights in our world. We still have a long way to go, however, thanks to Elie Wiesel and Susan B. Anthony it is a little shorter.

Some differences about these speeches are the different themes ones about a man who survived the holocaust during which Jewish people were being killed by the millions and it took years for it to come to an end. One is about a woman who took a stand and voted when it was illegal for women to vote. Women were thought of as less or submissive to men just because of their gender. “Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities.” (Anthony, 1872). The difference between Elie Wiesel’s speech and Susan B. Anthony’s is lack of equal right where as Elie Wiesel’s is about WWII. The similarities between these two speeches and events is indifference or lack of concern for issues that don’t concern some and lack of action to correct mistakes. As Elie Wiesel said, “Denying their humanity is when we begin to betray our own.”

Reference

  1. Anthony, Susan B. On Women's Right to Vote. Philadelphia, PA, 1872. https://www.sojust.net/speeches/susananthony.html.References
  2. Wiesel, Elie. The Perils of Indifference. Washington, DC, 12 April 1999. https://www.sojust.net/speeches/elie_wiesel_perils.html.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Wiesel's speech and Susan B. Anthony's. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Women’s Rights Activist Susan B. Anthony

Susan B. Anthony was a women's rights activist and one of the most visible leaders of the women's suffrage movement. She helped to form and later lead, the National American Women's Suffrage Association. She traveled around the country giving speeches and gathering signatures on petitions. She was born in 1820 to a Quaker family, and was raised with the Quaker belief that everyone was equal under God, an idea that guided her through most of her life. Anthony was born on February 15, 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts. Her Quaker raised father, Daniel, was a farmer and later a cotton mill owner and manager. Her mother, Lucy, came from a family that fought in the American Revolution and served in the Massachusetts government. Anthony had seven siblings, many of which ended up becoming social activists. After teaching for many years, Susan returned to her family where she met important activists, William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass who were friends of her father. They inspired her to become an abolition activist and Anthony gave many passionate speeches against slavery (Susan). Anthony and her family became involved in the fight to abolish slavery and their farmhouse served as a meeting place for many famed abolitionists. In the 1840s, Anthony became the head of the girl's department at Canajoharie Academy in New York for two years. When she left the academy, she began devoting more of her time to social movements, which for her at the time was mainly the temperance movement. The temperance movement was aimed at limiting or completely stopping the production and sale of alcohol. While campaigning against alcohol, Anthony became inspired to fight for women's rights when she was denied a chance to speak at a temperance convention because she was a woman. She realized that unless women had the right to vote, they would not be taken seriously in politics (Biography). Susan B. Anthony was extremely influential in the women's suffrage movement. As an activist she was often presented with many challenges but she remained steadfast in her dedication towards her causes. She often spoke at conventions and in 1853 she spoke at the state teachers convention where she called for women to be admitted to the profession and for better pay for female teachers. By 1859, she had spoken at several other teachers conventions arguing for coeducation and claiming that men and women were not intellectually different (Who). In 1851, she met with the prominent feminist, Elizabeth Cady Stanton. The two quickly became friends and collaborated in their work in support of women's suffrage (Susan). In 1863, they organized the Women's Loyal National League. The league provided an opportunity for women's rights activists to align with the fight against slavery (Everything). Anthony and Stanton founded the National Woman Suffrage Association in 1868. Later that year, the two women began publishing a weekly newspaper in New York City called The Revolution'. In the 1880s Anthony worked on The History of Woman Suffrage' with Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Matilda Joslyn Gage, and Ida Husted Harper (Accomplishments). Susan B. Anthony was a social activist and one of the most influential leaders of the women's suffrage movement. She traveled around the country giving speeches and gathering signatures on petitions in support of women's suffrage and the abolition of slavery. She was raised by people who inspired her to become an activist and stand up for what she believed was right. From a young age the Quaker belief that everyone was equal under God was instilled in her, this belief guided her through most of her life.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A women's rights activist Susan B. Anthony. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Questions and Reflections in Meditation

Descartes writes let us reflect that possibly neither our hands nor our whole body are such as they appear to us to be in his first meditation. If we can sense our hands and body with all of our senses, however, are they still deceived? By this I mean that if we can use all of our senses (see, touch, smell, taste, sometimes hear) to understand our bodies and hands, can we believe our senses are true then? b. Descartes writes I cannot at present yield too much to distrust, since I am not considering the question of action, but only of knowledge If Descartes yields completely to distrust, however, would he ever become happy? Because of his devotion to questioning everything ever said, is there any room to enjoy the conversation or thought about the subject being addressed? II. Reflections a. Descartes opens up by talking about how senses are deceptive. I think that this is a valid argument because senses are not always correct. What one person smells can be completely different from another person's opinion. The most deceptive sense is probably sight, for sometimes we can see things but not see them fully. For example, what we see in the news and media can be completely false. Just because we saw the news doesn't mean that every fact is true, therefore proving that what we see isn't always something that we can rely on for knowledge. b. Descartes writes how do I know that I am not deceived every time that I add two and three, or count the sides of a square, or judge of things yet simpler, if anything simpler can be imagined? I think a good analysis of this question is that there is certain knowledge gained because it is standard. We could have been deceived when younger and first learning how to count because we did not know the standard facts of math. Now, we are able to prove that 2+3=5 because that is the set answer and cannot be changed. If you take 2 objects and place them next to 3 other objects and count the total of objects you have then, you would come up with 5 every time. However, some things can be proven differently based on perspective, opening up the possibility of being deceived. Meditation 2 2 questions and reflections I. Reflections a. I think that it is interesting that Descartes decides to start completely over, considering that he possesses no senses. He writes I imagine that body, figure, extension, movement and place are but the fictions of my mind. I feel that if Descartes does this, then it would be hard to come up with what the body is in the first place. If one possesses no senses, then how can a body that takes up matter be explained without using those senses? I think that it is interesting that Descartes uses this approach because it is easy to be deceived by opinion when it comes to appearance. The body can be an illusion, but I believe that the mind has to be dependent on the body in order to determine what it is. No one else can tell someone how their body reacts or feels other than the mind that is connected to that body itself. b. Descartes says I am, I exist, that is certain. But how often? I think that this is an intriguing question because it focuses on the essence of existence. If man exists, but does not travel into public, does he truly exist? I'm questioning this because the only person who knows that this person exist would be himself. When someone goes into public, they are noticed by others, therefore proving their existence because that person took up space and made interactions throughout their day. If someone didn't show up into public all day, they still would exist because the body is still present and making actions regardless of who sees. After all, senses -including sight- can be deceiving, and can't always prove existence. II. Questions a. What is the reason behind Descartes' considering that he had no body or figure? How is it possible to not be deceived when figuring out what the body is at this point? b. Descartes asks the question What is a man? Shall I say a reasonable animal? and then goes on to say certainly not, for then I should have to inquire what an animal is and that would mean he falls into a whole other topic of questioning what a human is. Why is Descartes so quick to disregard this question, though? I think it's important how Descartes is critical and questioning of everything the body, senses, etc. but won't consider the comparison of man to animal. Why does he not continue to explore animals and their relation to man? Meditation 3 4 questions and reflections I. Reflections a. Descartes writes that he is a substance, similar to a stone. I am a thing that thinks and not one that is extended, and that the stone on the other hand is an extended thing which does not think he continues to say that both represent substances. I think that this is true that the two are substances, but in the sense that Descartes is a thing and the stone is a thing. The fact that he is a thing that thinks doesn't relate to the fact that the two substances take up space, therefore proving their existence. b. Descartes proves the existence of God within Meditations 3. He did this by arguing that we can't understand the definition of God if the idea was not already in our minds given to us by God himself. Also, no reflection that we gain through senses or imagination could come up with the idea of God either. Thus, the idea of a supreme being is only possible because that idea was already put in our minds by God himself. c. Descartes also proves that God cannot be a deceiver. I think that this is important of Descartes to include because if there is a God who displays truth, could he also deceive us? Descartes proves that falsity can never come from or be caused by God. He also cannot be the cause of errors. Since God is not the cause of error or ignorance, no one has ever been deceived by him. d. If the idea of God is present in our minds already, then that idea could only exist because He put it there. If this is not true, then we would know about other forces or substances that influence our daily lives and ideas. We cannot explain the existence of things such as humans, positive daily events, and perfection without a reason that being God. There is no other explanation for this, as Descartes proves. II. Questions a. Descartes asks if he can discover in himself other things that he had not yet perceived. Is it possible to discover oneself through other people? b. Descartes writes although I could perhaps pretend that such a being does not exist, nevertheless I could not pretend that the idea of such a being discloses to me nothing realIt is indeed an idea that is utterly clear and distinct Why does Descartes choose that this is clear and distinct when there is no proof? What makes Descartes so sure about God's presence to not question it more than his other theories about his existence or senses? c. Descartes writes that the idea of God is innate in me, just as the idea of myself is innate in me. If this is true, then why aren't we born knowing how to speak or how to add 2+3 ? d. It is quite obvious that God cannot be a deceiver, for it is manifest by the light of nature that all fraud and deception depend on some defect. If God cannot be a deceiver, is there another being outside of Earth that is similar to God, but chooses to deceive instead of provide truth? Meditation 4 2 questions and reflections I. Questions a. Descartes writes God exists, and that my existence depends entirely on Him in every moment of my life. If our existence depends entirely on God, why does He not make Himself more prominent in our lives as an actual being? b. God would be a deceiver if we constantly run into error and illusion. When we do run into error, however, is that the product of another supreme being deceiving us? II. Reflections a. if God has not placed in me the capacity for error, it seems as though I could never fall into error Descartes writes this at the beginning of Meditation 4, and I think that in certain circumstances God places us into situations where we can learn from our mistakes. Since Descartes proves to us in Meditation 3 that God cannot cause error or ignorance, this theory would be correct because we made the mistake ourselves. Descartes' answer to this is that error must originate in one's nonbeing. b. Error comes from lack of judgement, as Descartes explains. I think that this is important in proving that God does not deceive us. Since God gives free will, nature never can condemn one to have error. Error is a consequence of poor judgement or lack of clarity. Therefore, error cannot come from God because he provides us with free will giving us freedom to make mistakes. (I say freedom because mistakes are not a consequence of the free will God gives us, they are a consequence of the actions we choose based on that free will) Meditation 5 2 questions and reflections I. Questions a. Descartes writes in his fifth meditation that He (God) possesses every sort of perfection and that existence is one of these perfections. Is it possible for perfection to deceive us or harm us in certain situations? Or is perfection always perfect, no matter what? b. Descartes proves that knowledge can be drawn from certain facts that are standard, such as 2+2=4. Similarly, geometry is proven as standard information in which other conclusions can be drawn from. Can geometry, like a triangle, be deceiving though? Since triangles can look differently acute, isosceles, and right triangles all have different lengths to their sides is this deceiving? II. Reflections a. If God creates perfection, and existence is one of these perfections, it is possible for perfection to become negative. However, this is not His fault. I think that if God created a man who in his free will decided to commit errors, it would not reflect poorly on God's intention. Although God created perfection and created a perfect man, it was that man's mistakes and errors that caused him to become negative. b. Descartes writes that the ideas which I formed of myself were not so distinct as those which I perceived through the senses. I think this is interesting because it almost contradicts what Descartes claims in his first meditation that the senses are deceiving. I think that because the senses are given to us from God, they are not as deceiving as Descartes first thought. They can be deceived if we are not careful about where we draw our knowledge from especially with sight because of news media and articles that relay false information. Meditation 6 2 questions and reflections I. Questions a. And yet I have learned from some persons whose arms or legs have been cut off, that they sometimes seemed to feel pain in the part which had been amputated Does this mean that existence is not always essential ? (If a man loses his leg, that leg is not in existence anymore nor the pain, so would he really be feeling that pain or is the mind deceiving the body?) II. Reflections a. Imagination is nothing but a certain application of the faculty of knowledge to the body and therefore exists according to Descartes. I think that our ability to imagine is where we start to become deceived. This is where we have to be careful of where we gain our understanding of objects. For example, one man's idea of what a pen looks like differs from another man's idea. They could be thinking of two completely different looking objects, though they represent the same category. This does not mean that our idea is wrong, but is an example that what one person learns is the truth can be a completely different perspective of someone else leading to the question of who is right b. Feelings of pleasure, pain, hunger, thirst, etc. could not have proceeded from my mind, so that they must necessarily have been produced in me by some other things I thought this was interesting because we do not ask to be hungry or thirsty, they are feelings that are already present in our minds. These judgements as Descartes calls them are formed inside of us before we can reject them, thus making these feelings essential to survival. Meditations 5 and 6 2 questions and reflections I. Questions a. Throughout meditations, Descartes begins to tie his ideas together. All of these ideas come down to one conclusion God has given us our basic nature. Why does Descartes decide that God is the sole cause of perfection and creation and no one else is involved? If there is no deceiver, where does the deceiving come from in the first place? b. Descartes writes For it seems to me that it is mind alone, and not mind and body in conjunction, that is requisite to a knowledge of the truth in regard to such things (such as pain) Can the body not help communicate to the mind and help develop this knowledge? II. Reflections a. In meditation 6, Descartes talks about essence and body. He says that I rightly conclude that my essence consists solely in the fact that I am a thinking thing He continues to say that the soul is distinct from the body, and it is possible to exist without it. b. Feelings of hunger, thirst, and pain are examples of mind-body dualism. Descartes says all these sensationsare in truth none other than certain confused modes of thought which are produced by the union and apparent intermingling of mind and body this is Descartes' last main point that the mind and body are distinct from each other but work together to make the body function. These feelings of hunger/thirst are nature's way of communicating to the body. There is a clear understanding of this feeling, proving that the ideas of these feelings are already imbedded in our minds.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Questions and Reflections in Meditation. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

An Analytical Genius René Descartes

Ren© Descartes was an analytical genius. He conceived and articulated ideas about the nature of knowledge that were essential to the Enlightenment and created the philosophical underpinnings for the development of modern science, which included the idea that laws of nature are constant and are sufficient to explain natural phenomena. Descartes felt that truth was clear and accessible to the ordinary human intellect, if the search for truth was directed properly. Two of his writings, Rules for the Direction of the Mind and Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason defined ways of obtaining knowledge. The latter work contained Geometry, that introduced the Cartesian coordinate system and marked the birth of analytic geometry, in which geometric relationships are investigated by means of algebra. Descartes also contributed to areas of music theory, mechanics, physics, optics, anatomy, and physiology. Ren© du Perron Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 in La Haye (now Descartes), in the province of Touraine, France. He was born into the gentry, a well-to-do class of landowners between the nobility and the bourgeoisie. His father, Joachim, was a councilor to the high court at Rennes in Brittany. From his mother, Jeanne Brochard, Descartes received the property that gave him his financial independence. Descartes was her third and last surviving child. She died in childbirth in 1597 and he and his older brother and sister were brought up by their maternal grandmother, Jeanne Sain. In 1600, Descartes' father remarried and moved to Ch©telleraut. Descartes seems not to have had enduring relationships with his father or siblings; however, the elder Descartes early on recognized his youngest child's curiosity, referring to him as "my little philosopher." In 1606, Descartes was sent to La Fl©che, the Jesuit school at Anjou. Descartes' health was considered delicate and the rector, Father Charlet, allowed him to spend mornings in bed in contemplation, a habit he continued throughout most of his life. Descartes spent nine years at La Fl©che, where he perfected his Latin, studied humanities, philosophy, and mathematics, and was introduced to new developments in opticsin astronomy. Although Descartes expressed high regard for his education, it was at La Fl©che he realized that, with the exception of mathematics and geometry, he had learned nothing that was absolute truth. He first saw mathematics only as the servant of mechanics, but was struck "by the certainty of its proofs and the evidence of its reasonings" and was surprised that nothing loftier had been erected upon its foundations. Descartes moved to a house outside Paris in 1614, where he shut himself off from others. Although he was self-assured and expected admiration from others, scholars have suggested that he suffered from depression. He spent the year 1615-1616 at the University of Poitiers, where he earned a law degree. The law did not interest Descartes; he chose instead to become a gentleman soldier. He had resolved "to seek no knowledge other than that which could be found in myself or else in the great book of the world," and in the summer of 1618 he traveled to Holland, where he joined the army of Prince Maurice of Nassau as an unpaid volunteer. In Breda he met Isaac Beeckman, the Dutch philosopher, doctor and physicist. Descartes' discussions with Beeckman rekindled his interest in applying mathematical reasoning to problems in physics. Descartes' first work, Compendium Musicae, an arithmetical account of sound, was dedicated to Beeckman and given to him as a New Year's gift in 1619. At this time, Descartes also worked on problems in falling bodies, hydrostatics, a proportional compass, and a theory of proportional magnitudes. Descartes resigned from Maurice's army, and traveled to Bavaria to join the Bavarian Army. Stationed at Ulm in Neuburg, he met the Rosicrucian and mathematician Johannes Faulhaber. On November 10, 1619, in a "stove-heated room," Descartes had the mystical experience that set his life's course. He had been searching for a method of obtaining knowledge, and in a state of delirium had three vivid dreams in succession. Much has been made of the dreams (even the suggestion that they were symptomatic of migraine headaches), but their result was to convince Descartes of his divine mission to found a new philosophical system, in which he would reduce physics to geometry and connect all sciences through a chain of mathematical logic. Descartes subsequently gave up the military life and traveled widely for several years, visiting Italy, Germany, and Holland, where along the way he studied glaciers, made meteorological observations, and computed the heights of mountains. From 1625 to 1628, he lived in Paris and became friends with Marin Mersenne, a Franciscan friar who had also attended La Fl©che. In Paris, Descartes produced Regulae("Rules for the Direction of the Mind"), which was published in 1701, after his death. In 1629 Descartes retired to Holland, where he devoted the next 20 years to studies of science and philosophy. During this time he made three trips back to Paris, where Mersenne acted as his editor and agent. The tolerant Protestant climate of Holland protected Descartes from academic and theological disputes, at least in the beginning, and he moved frequently to avoid visitors. He was not a recluse, however; he visited universities and talked with mathematicians, philosophers, and physicians. Descartes studied anatomy and frequently visited butcher shops to obtain animal carcasses for dissection. In 1633, he completed Le monde("Of the World"), which included his theories in physiology, perception, and a heliocentric cosmology. When Descartes learned that Galileo had been condemned by the Inquisition for embracing Copernicus' ideas, he withheld Le monde from publication. He modified information from Le monde for use in his 1637 masterpiece, A Discourse on the Method of rightly conducting the Reason and seeking Truth in the Sciences. Further, the Dioptric, Meteors, and Geometry, essays in this Method. The Meteorswas the first attempt to give a scientific theory of the weather. The Dioptric explained rainbows, and contained the law of refraction, describing the behavior of light rays transmitted from one medium to another. Descartes' Geometry, essentially an appendix to the Discourse on Method, revolutionized mathematics and provided the foundation for what is now known as analytic geometry. It enabled the use of algebra, a relatively new branch of mathematics, for the discovery and investigation of geometrical theorems. He introduced the use of coordinates, by which is possible to begin with equations of any degree of complexity and interpret their algebraic and analytic properties geometrically. In the Geometry, Descartes introduced algebraic notation that is still in use today, dealt with the problem of Pappus, and provided a systematic definition of curves. In Amsterdam, Descartes had formed a liaison with his serving girl, H©l©ne, who bore him a daughter, Francine, on July 19, 1635. H©l©ne and Francine came to live with him in Santpoort, and he made arrangements for Francine to be educated in France. Unfortunately, she died in 1640, probably of scarlet fever. Descartes published his major metaphysical work, Meditations on First Philosophy, in which the Existence of God and the Distinction between Mind and Body are Demonstrated in 1641. Although he quickly published an edition containing solicited objections and his replies to them, he was particularly criticized and attacked by the president of the University of Utrecht, Gisbert Voet, and published his lengthy defense as Episula at Voetium. In 1643 Descartes began a long-lasting correspondence with 24-year-old Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia, who lived in exile in Holland. In his letters, Descartes discussed his philosophy of the mind and its relation to the body, and the relationship between reason and the passions. He dedicated his 1644 Principles of Philosophy, which contains a naturalistic theory of the solar system, to Princess Elizabeth. Descartes accepted an invitation to tutor 20-year-old Queen Christina of Sweden in 1649. After much hesitation he left for Sweden on September 1, where the energetic Queen put him to work writing verses and a pastoral comedy, and planning a Swedish academy of science. She insisted that he meet with her at five in the morning when her mind was most active. The lessons began in mid-January 1650, but the early hours and the record cold winter quickly took their toll on Descartes. On February 1, he contracted pneumonia. He refused to see the royal physician and instead relied on his own remedy, wine flavored with tobacco. He died in Stockholm on February 11, 1650. In 1666, Descartes' remains were exhumed and returned to France, where they were moved several times before being permanently placed in the chapel of the Sacr© Coeur in the church of St. Germain-des-Pr©s in 1819. At the time of the original exhumation, the French ambassador was given permission to cut off Descartes' right forefinger. Descartes' skull was said to have been removed by a guard and it was sold several times, coming into the possession of Georges Cuvier in 1821. Although it has not been authenticated, the skull is on display at the Mus©e de l'Homme in the Palais de Chaillot.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

An analytical genius René Descartes. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Descartes’ Method of Radical Doubt

Knowledge is the things that one has taken into itself and made the decision to believe that it is true. In order to find absolute certainty about certain pieces of knowledge, Descartes began to ask himself what makes the obtained information true. Thus, Descartes decided to doubt everything until arriving at a concrete truth that could not be denied. This method is called radical doubt. Descartes began to doubt his own existence. The philosopher asked many questions to himself and even compared dreams to reality. When we dream our senses tell us that we are living the moment and that something is occurring when really is not. Descartes thus poses the possibility of real life being like a dream and that may not be happening. The two deductions of Descartes are that the soul and the body are completely different substances and that the soul is easier to understand than the body. The philosopher explained that God organized the rules of mind-body interaction in such a way as to produce sensations that are generally favorable to the good of the body. Descartes stated that God is the guarantee of the truth of what we know with clarity and distinction, but at the same time, to prove the existence of God, used clarity and distinction. Thus, Descartes attempted to explain the existence of God using an argument that was supposed to be possible only by God. This objection to Descartes' philosophy is known as the "Cartesian circle". David Hume was a philosopher who was also in disagreement with Descartes. Hume thought that we do not have, and can not have, any idea of me. According to Hume, all our ideas are originated in impressions. However, we have no impression that could be at the origin of the idea of self. All that we find when we look at ourselves is a succession of unique perceptions and never a perception of the self. The last idea of Descartes' philosophy was to prove the existence of the outside world by arguing that the ideas whose cause we attribute to physical objects have the same cause. However, Hume denies that it is possible to prove the existence of the outside world. As Descartes, Hume accepts the distinction between reality and our perceptions, but argues that we only have direct experience of the representations in our mind, not of the physical objects, their supposed causes, and that, therefore, it is not possible to have experience of the causal relation between our mental representations and the objects they are supposed to represent. So there is no reason to think that physical objects are the cause of our perceptions and so, that there are physical objects.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Descartes' method of radical doubt. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Rene Descartes and Mathematics

Rene Descartes was born in La Haye, France on March 31, 1596. Descartes had a brilliant mind and was intensely educated. He was the youngest of 3 children. His mother died within his first year of life. Due to his passing of his mother, his father decides to send the children to live with their grandmother, but his father saw a lot of potential for Descartes education and place him in a high educational environment. By the age of 8, Descartes attended Jesuit college. Looking through the scheduling of young descartes, we can see how he might have been sickly seeing how he would sleep until mid morning and work around the university's schedule. Descartes was a very good student in which studied philosophy for preparation in the future. Later Descartes would receive a degree in law by the age of 22. The father of Analytical Geometry. His nickname for his contribution to geometry, his main achievement was to first form a bridge to connect the concepts between algebra and geometry. For the close examination and clarity demonstrated from Descartes , he is widely acclaimed as first mathematician who laid the foundation of modern geometry that resulted in development of analysis and calculus(Descartes 1), as stated in the article Rene Descartes'. His results explained how you can solve algebraic equation using geometrical shapes. Descartes Main contribution to calculus was bringing forth his coordinate system. His coordinate system later known as ,Cartesian coordinate system tended to explain the algebraic equations through geometrical shapes. He invented the convention of representing unknowns in equations by x, y and z.( Descartes 2). The contribution was used by many other philosophers such as Newton to help evolve a new branch of mathematics. Descartes would even later apply his geometric method to physics in which explained the deducted method in which stated, results can be inferred by perceptions of geometric properties of body (Descartes 3). Descartes contributions were mind opening and clarified new doors for the challenges philosophers faced. In conclusion, The father of Analytical Geometry was an incredibly important factor to the development of mathematical methods in which are used today. Descartes interest in the creation of connecting the concepts between algebra and geometry was astonishing. The way he connected the solutions of Algebreic equations by using the shapes provided
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Rene Descartes and mathematics. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Epistemological Questions by Descartes

Epistemological questions concerning intellect and the senses have long been explored by philosophers, most popularly Rene Descartes. Descartes, in his Meditations on First Philosophy, uses systematic doubt to undermine and challenge sense perception. His ideas reconcile science and religion, but also the mind and the body. His famous quote I think therefore I am is ultimately revealing of how Descartes proves our existence. When Descartes claims that the star is not much greater than the flame he is conceding that sense perception holds, to a great extent, weight in determining our understandings of the world, but meaning and ideas are created predominantly through the intellect. According to his arguments, we can only be certain that we exist through our minds, our physical world is much more dubious and difficult to comprehend. Sense perception is limited, therefore the mind must work in conjunction with our senses to create concepts, thoughts, and ideas. Descartes is making a reference to sense perception, even through the star quote, but he claims that our intellect is more useful in actually creating distinctions between certain ideas and concepts. Sense perception would make us believe that a star is not greater than a candle flame because since we perceive it from so far away and a flame can generate heat that we feel more easily, the senses would give reason to believe that the candle flame is greater. However, through intellect and reasoning we are able to understand the differences between stars and candle flames which ultimately allows us to get closer to the truth. His star metaphor is closely related to his wax argument which states that when an ordinary piece of wax loses its physical qualities after being heated, we still recognize it as that same piece of wax but also somehow we know that it is no longer a candle. As humans, we do not process sensory information the way that a robot or Artificial Intelligence would, instead we predetermine the meaning of things and assign them value or categorize them in our minds. Melted wax is still the same substance as a candle and, yet, we do not see it as such because we seem to qualify things based upon their utility in the world. A robot would process the physical properties and not know how to further distinguish. A flame is not the same as a star, even though they may look similar and perhaps even be composed of the same materials and through the intellect and reasoning we have, we are able to establish that a star is greater a flame, even though from far distances it does not necessarily appear to be greater. Descartes highlights the human ability to create meaning with a combination of the mind and the body, advocating a dualist perspective. Our interactions with sensory experience are interpreted through our minds and knowledge is produced as we intellectually question the senses.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Epistemological questions by Descartes. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

About Enron Company

Enron was formed in 1985 as a result of a merger between two companies. The company was first named HNG InterNorth, after the two companies that merged, Houston Natural Gas Corporation and InterNorth, Inc. In 1986, the company was renamed Enron. After being renamed, Enron was known as an energy supplier and trader. In 1990, the CEO and chairman of Enron, Kenneth Lay, created the Enron Finance Corporation. Lay made Jeffrey Skilling the head of the corporation. At the time, the company was doing very well. By 1992, Enron was the largest seller of natural gas in North America. Not only were they providing natural gas, by 1994 they were also providing electricity. In 1999, Enron Online was launched, allowing trades worth $2.5 billion a day to be executed. Enron was one of the most successful companies worldwide. Enron was awarded “America’s Most Innovative Company” by Fortune for six years in a row. This being said, some of their records were simply not adding up. A combination of issues caused Enron to file for bankruptcy. One of these issues was their very complicated business models. They were also practicing very unethical practices. They were recording their finances incorrectly. They would record profits they never actually made and not record losses. This is called Mark-to-Market accounting, which some people believe started their downfall. In 2001, Enron filed for bankruptcy. Their stock prices were exponentially lower than they had ever been at a mere $0.61. It was estimated that Enron was $23 billion in debt. Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling were both on trial for money laundering, fraud, insider trading, and more. Skilling was given a harsh sentence, with twenty-four years and four months in prison. Later, his sentence was reduced by twenty years. He is still in prison today and is required to give $42 million to the Enron victims. Lay was going to get a maximum sentence of forty-five years, but died before ever being sentenced or going to prison. People who owned Enron stock were hurt greatly by the downfall of Enron. About $74 billion was lost. More than half of that $74 billion was connected to fraud. Enron started to auction off their assets. A lawsuit was filed and won by former Enron employees. There were many new reforms and regulations put in place because of the Enron scandal. The Sarbanes-Oxley act created rules for audit reports. The Financial Accounting Standards Board raised its level of ethics. The government is very strict of financial records now, partly because of the Enron scandal. They need to be very accurate. The Enron scandal is not the largest scandal to ever happen, but it started to make people notice financial fraud. Many Enron employees suffered greatly from this, losing great benefits they once had. This scandal remained very popular for a very long time and is still relevant to this day. It would be very hard to fall as hard as Enron did today.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

About Enron company. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Enron Filed for Bankruptcy

The research I conducted throughout the semester was an event that happened on the day I was born it's about the Enron Company, an American energy-trading company based in Houston, Texas that filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Dec 2, 2001 and ended on October 6, 2002. This event caught my attention because it was a very drastic bankruptcy, sparking one of the largest corporate scandals in the U.S and Texas history. Another dramatic point was that finding out that the company had been lying to their investors and employees about debts and losing profits, while assuring their employees to buy more shares and to not worry that the company was on a rebound which cause the employees to lose all their life savings and when it was sent to court it had 35 counts including fraud, conspiracy and insider trading. This were the reason why I chose this event, it brought me great curiosity that a great profited company made the turn to the worts and I wanted to find out what were the after effects of the Enron company going to bankruptcy and finding the reasons that cause this to happen and inside information of the employees to know what happened what they thought that really happened, with also finding out what happened in court.The primary sources I used to find the information were newspapers and I would go more in detailed about the topic. The Enron employees seek voice in the bankruptcy and one of the former employees speaks up with others ,out of the 4,500 employees fired only 200 of the former employees are uniting together to claim their severance pay as it what said by Rod Jordan we're about getting just due compensation for former employees and we also want equal representation. Because they were supposed to get 37,000 instead got 4,500 which is a crime as the company has to pay a certain amount that the employees deserve it also inform me how the company hided the information about their bankruptcy from their employees and investors to continue get money from them trying to save the company that was already in ruins too late to be saved and become a prosperous company that once was. Another, horrible act that the company Enron made to save the company from bankruptcy was to blame Dynegy company for the bankruptcy and was trying to steal more money on them by suing them saying that Dynegy took advantage of its larger rival's unpredictable financial situation and cause its downfall by backing out of the amalgamation days before Enron was forced to file for bankruptcy, because they didn't invest their 8.4 billion dollars which is a huge lawsuit and another thing was that in the same day they filed for bankruptcy, which is false because the company Enron was already in a downfall but they still sued Dynegy Inc. saying lies that its was their fault as Bristow a Dynegy attorney said No one can show Dynegy made this happen and people were surprised that an excellent company as Enron went downhill as people were quoting that this company was the Titanic and it had gone down hill , for the bad decisions the Enron company made on the business causing them to go for bankruptcy. Bankruptcy was also cause by the company not paying their taxes as the company Enron releases their tax records from 1985 to the time the company file for bankruptcy, this action was done by the congress to find out what caused and what bad decisions they made that the Enron company had to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy which is a form of bankruptcy that involves a reorganization of a debtor's, business affairs, debts and assets which are the most expensive. This would also help the congress see if laws need to be changed so this problem would never happen again to a another company and another drastic effect on the economy and our society as people lost their jobs would also not happen again. Some Companies were lucky to not lose money as some executives were informed that the company Enron filed for bankruptcy so they quickly withdrew all their money so they would not lose what they invested but other companies were not so lucky that ended losing all the money they invested and their was also prove that for five years enron didn't pay taxes which was another thing that cause the company to go for bankruptcy and be fined with criminal offenses. Not only were other companies losing money that had invested with Enron but also the employees as the company Enron had a program that gave the employees the opportunity to invest and buy stocks and some people lost their retiring money and we're left with nothing and some were confident that they were not going to get the money they lost as Michelle Robichaux said I'm not confident well see that money and she lost $1million and the effect was that her retirement ideas were greatly devalued. The person that was the head and CEO of the Enron company when it was filed for bankruptcy was Kenneth Lay which was once a exalted corporate leader with a prosperous company that had a bright future and turn to be a executive in exile with a company that was left in the dust without money and with a huge debt as he presents himself in the congress to testify what happen to the company and why it went into bankruptcy and how economically it turn out to be a company in ruins.It was also proven that the executives were living their lives to the fullest without a care that the company was in bankruptcy while the employees were trying to fight for their money that was stolen from them , like the titanic, men in the boats and children and women in the water but theirs it's only a good explanation its that the CEO was not the man for the job because he brought the destruction of his own company this shows that he was not qualified to be a CEO for a big corporation, as John Allairo who worked in Enron company as business development said either he did not understand our business or he didn't have a good judgement in business. Although some people were saying that we were rushing to judge the company Enron because they might have done some not illegal business but not alot because have of their business were doing alright and everything was illegal, because was not answered why exactly did Enron have to file for bankruptcy when many of its business where real and working? and that question was never answered and as the Ceo was speaking in court he was never able to finish his speech and that question was lead hanging. But as more prove was showed of the crimes the company made that question was left unanswered. The biggest news that hurt many people was that the government knew before it even happened that the company was going for bankruptcy as Rep. Henry Whatsman said It's clear the White House had knowledge on what was happening with the company Enron and knew it was going to collapse but did nothing to try and protect the innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their lives savings and as this was made public the White House was forced to answer questions and as they were answers a lot of the U.S. attorney's disqualified itself from the investigation because they had family that worked on the company but one person that had no family that worked their investigated and that was Arthur Andersen and he found out that some documents were deleted but some were saved and were of money that the company profited and found more prove that brought the company more to the ground as their was more information found about all the bad decisions they made and the only good thing that came out was that the President Bush made a law so all this ordeal would never happen again to our society and to learn from the mistakes the company made so the economy doesn't suffer with the people that lost their jobs and money.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Enron filed for bankruptcy. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Enron’s Accountability

Enron was considered to be one of the largest growing company's in Texas. The company was also ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, but that was extremely short lived when the company collapsed under a tremendous amount of debt. This debt was hidden through a difficult and high-tech scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Due to this collapse the company was forced to file bankruptcy, which is turn caused over 4,000 employees and thousands of others lost their retirement funds due to investments they made within the company. The stockholders lost millions of dollars as the stock prices fell dramatically. Enron had an overpowering aura of extreme pride and by a belief that ran deep from the beginning that the company could handle any type of hazards without any worries or stress about there being issues. The company name was tarnished, and the integrity of the company was destroyed by this scandal. This bankruptcy was just the beginning for Enron, the company also became a part of a huge and very public investigation into the company finances and determine what happened and who was responsible for the company collapsing. How did the corporate culture of Enron contribute to its bankruptcy? The culture of Enron that contributed to its bankruptcy had many different reasons for these consequences. First off, Enron's corporate culture supported any and all unethical behaviors without ever once questioning the legality of the situation as long as whatever it was resulted in a monetary gain. Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell (2013) indicated that, Enron's corporate culture rewarded innovation and punished employees deemed week rather than promoting values of respect and integrity. Enron had a rank and yank system that they created an intense and competitive work environment for all employees. This system was designed to promote those who had what it took to make the company a success and to yank away any promotion or job in general for those who just could not cut it in the company. It also took caused such a competitive area that any employee that fell in the bottom 20 percent of performance was forced out of the company. An article written in LinkedIn by Jason Martin stated that, For a company to thrive and be productive, it requires a healthy corporate culture among its workers and employers. From the beginning, Enron stated that were a good and ethical company and wanted to help make a change for others. They claimed that they had morals and that their beliefs were good and held the upmost respect for the laws. Unfortunately, this stream of misguiding and misusing of funds has proven otherwise for this once glamorous company. Did Enron's bankers, auditors, and attorneys contribute to Enron's demise? If so, how? Enron's bankers, auditors, and attorneys contributed to Enron's demise in several different ways. The accounting practices showed that Enron was guilty of fraud and that the company had established the SPEs to move assets and debt off its balance sheet and to increase in cash flow by showing that funds were flowing through its books when it sold assets (Ferrell, 2017). This seemed to work well for the company as long as the stocks remained intact and at a high rate but the minute that the stock prices fell, Enron could not foot the bill or cover the compensation in the downfall. Most outside observers knew that these practices were unfavorable and fraudulent in reporting, because they did not accurately represent the company's true financial status. However, the company made every effort to make sure it appeared that they were doing everything correct to outsiders. The company could have tried to get ahead of this situation however they chose to ignore it instead. When Vice President Sherron Watkins, who's job was to find assets that could be sold off, instead found off the book arrangements that were backed by Enron's deflating stock and this became very troubling to her. She confronted the CEO at that time, Chair Ken Lay. Lay decided to respond to these accusations by having the company's law firm and accounting firm start an investigation which to no one's surprise, no evidence was found to support Watkins accusations. After this incident, Watkins was removed from her comfy office and was given less important job task elsewhere. The company then decided that they needed to create a new policy to destroy any documentation that would discredit the company. Enron knew that it was only a matter of time before things began to get more complicated. Then the company began to go through investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission because of the bankruptcy, the company was told that any person who took part in destroying documentation, would then be charged and become an accomplice in the whole cover-up scheme. What role did the company's chief financial officer play in creating the problems that led to Enron's financial problems? Unfortunately, when a company this large is under investigation, the prosecutor looks for someone to blame. The company usually plans for these sorts of scenarios and has a person in place in case the worse ever happens. In this case, Andrew Fastow was given that title as the company's Fall Guy. As Fastow, was the company's chief financial officer, he was charged with 98 counts regarding his involvement. The charges included fraud, money laundering, conspiracy, and one count of obstruction of justice. Fastow was thought to be the brain behind the partnerships used to conceal more the $1 billion in Enron debt which directly led to Enron's bankruptcy (Ferrell, 2017). He tried to inflate the profits and was one of the reasons for his indictment. Fastow originally claimed he was not guilty and had no knowledge of any wrong doing. Fastow claimed that he had the CEO and the company lawyers review his work and verified that everything was correct and in order. Fastow eventually cut a deal with the prosecutors by giving them the information they needed and returning all monetary assets he had as repayment for all he had taken during this process. All the top executives at Enron were subject to prosecution due to all the company scrutiny. In a recent interview, Fastow stated that things that his company and things that he did back then are still being done today. Fastow said that his job was to view the rules and regulations and security laws and find the vagueness within them and use it as an opportunity and take advantage of what works for the company. The issue with that is although there may be a vague understanding of the laws and regulations, one's ethical beliefs should be strong enough to determine if that is being done is morally wrong. Since his release from prison, Fastow has a regular 9 to 5 job and does an occasional lecture in regards to fraud and what he did and his actions and how he deals with the backlash daily. Nevertheless, Fastow, never says a harsh word about any of his bosses and continues to believe that though he knew what he did was wrong he did not believe it was illegal, he just thought it was how you played the game. In conclusion, Enron became the largest company to be faced with such intense scandal and bankruptcy in business history. The scandal become legendary and even resulted in a movie about the collapse and the events that led up to and came afterwards. The company put aside their so-called ethical beliefs and good moral conduct and instead decided to think profit over professionalism and honor. Throughout the bankruptcy and investigation, the members of the board had every chance to change the course of the case and do the right thing. This would have caused more punishment for themselves, but it would have restored some of the members integrity. The company truly lost sight of what they stood for and became greedy and looking to make every opportunity to increase profit whatever the way. Proverbs 15:27, Whoever is greedy for unjust gain troubles his own household, but he who hates brides will live. The company caused trouble for their household by becoming filled with greed. Now they must reap what they sow. Galatians 6:7, Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. This will forever be a case worth the study and provide much needed insight and lessons learned on the importance of business ethics and discovering the vague or gray areas and deciding how to correct them in an ethical and good moral way.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Enron's accountability. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Philosophy of Journalism

Journalism in the modern world is one of the primary practices which is essential for the common knowledge of the people. Journalists all over the world try hard to report and uncover the truth of mysterious cases, be it political, social, economic or environmental. The hardships and difficulties that the journalists face in the process are unimaginable. However, between all these hardships it is essential for the journalists to maintain a code of conduct and abide by the philosophy of journalism in order to do justice to the noble profession that they do. In today's world there is a tendency for the journalists to delve deep into the matter of the fact and develop the stories with details and facts. However, in doing so, the journalists should abide by the moral obligations and uphold their responsibilities towards the society as a priority over the entertainment factor.

The question of obligation of the media personnel are raised in this context. It is very hard to determine that in today's world whether they are obliged to the media houses they work for or to the public. According to Kant's means to an ends' ideology media can be related to ethics, where the great philosopher is of the idea that no person should be used for the purpose of benefits for another person (Côt©, Piff and Willer 2013). In this context it can be related to the ethics of journalism. Today it is a known fact, that many eminent journalists have been reported to use unethical means to fabricate their stories or use unethical ways to make up stories to cater to the entertainment factor of the general reader. This goes against the ethics of journalism. If Kant's philosophy is to be considered, then it can be said that journalists should limit themselves to the reporting of the true facts and leave the choice of decision in the hands of readers (Stein 2016). It is improper according to Kant's theory for a journalist to take advantage of the situation and fabricate the news accordingly to influence the readers. The breach in the ethics is against the philosophy of journalism. Secondly, comes the truth telling part of journalism.

The true purpose of journalism is to report the truth to the general public (Allen and Hindman 2014). However, if looked upon ethically, truth-telling can be done in a number of ways. Now in the notion of journalism, it is to be stated that a journalist should report the entire truth in an unbiased manner without hiding any facts. According to Kant's philosophy, truth is a universal law, which is imperative for the knowledge of all. The philosophy of journalism is also true for all (Marcuse 2013). It can be seen that journalism can be defined by different ethics but from the above discussion it can be concluded that the two most important ethics are to present an unbiased report and also to present the entire truth and leave the decision making to the readers. References: Allen, D.S. and Hindman, E.B., 2014. The media and democracy: Using democratic theory in journalism ethics. The ethics of journalism: Individual, institutional, and cultural influences, pp.185-203. C??t©, S., Piff, P.K. and Willer, R., 2013. For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(3), p.490. Marcuse, H., 2013. Reason and revolution. Routledge. Stein, A., 2016. Journalism and Ethics. In Real-World Media Ethics (pp. 169-183). Focal Press.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Philosophy Of Journalism. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

A Journalism and a Government

One of the roles of the government is for the three branches to check and balance one another. This works towards preventing corruption in the government and preventing one branch from becoming more powerful than the other branches. The government is not the only one capable of checking itself, and journalism plays a large role in watching the government. One of the roles of journalism is to inform the public of current events, and events relating to the government are not exempt. Journalists have a responsibility to publish the truth, and occasionally these truths make scandals and corruption in the government known to the public. If a politician is engaging in illegal activities, or if the government was trying to hide something, they would not wish for this information to be public. Journalists would report on it anyway, and in this way journalists have power over the government and government officials. Journalists have an influence on more than just the people in charge of the government, as they have influence over laws and policies. Part of reporting the truth involves reporting on policies and laws that need changing, sparking government action in the form of reforms to faulty laws. Just as journalism has power over the government, the government has some power over the government and can act as a check to them as well. Journalists have influence and power over government officials and over legislation, seen through the Watergate Scandal and reporting on Standard Oil respectively, and the government as well has some influence over journalism and what is and is not able to be published. One of the greatest impacts that journalism has on the government is their power over government officials, especially the president himself. Journalists are constantly watching the president and reporting on his actions, both positive and negative. When scandals occur, it is the job of journalists to report to the public what is happening, even if in doing so it hurts the president's reputation. In this way, journalism acts as a check on the president because he cannot get away with doing immoral or illegal actions without citizens becoming aware of it. The greatest example is the journalism done during the Watergate scandal. Five men had broken into Democratic headquarters at the Watergate complex, and it was later found out that the Nixon administration was connected to the break-in. Journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the Washington Post are famous for their reporting on and work uncovering the truth of the scandal. The movie All The President's Men depicts their process and work in uncovering the story. The pair worked for months conducting interviews and going through countless records in order to uncover the truth. The work they did was worth it however, and would end up changing history. Through their work, the pair discovered that the Nixon administration was behind the Watergate break-in. Mark Feldstein, a former investigative reporter for CNN and ABC, discusses the influence of Woodward and Bernstein's reporting in an essay for the journal American Journalism. In talking about their work, he notes that, They were the first journalists to link the burglars to the Nixon White House, to disclose that the break-in was funded by the president's re-election campaign, to report that it was part of a wider pattern of political sabotage, and to implicate Nixon's attorney general and White House chief of staff in the scandal (Feldstein, 2014). Because of their work, the story was able to be pieced together and published. As a direct result of their journalism, citizen's opinions of President Nixon became more negative and Nixon was forced to resign as president. This shows the power that journalism has in the government. By simply publishing this story, Woodward and Bernstein were able to set President Nixon's resignation into motion. It was because they were journalists that Woodward and Bernstein were able to accomplish what they did. The press has the power and responsibility to report on issues such as this, even if it directly affects the president himself. This power comes from the first amendment, which grants freedom of the press. Under this amendment journalists can report on the government without censorship. With this right, journalists can break stories such as Watergate and hold power over politicians. In addition to their impact on government officials, Journalists have an impact on the laws that the government passes as well. The job of a journalist is to make the public aware of current events. While not often, sometimes these events are serious enough to get the supreme court and or congress involved to fix a faulty law or to amend and issue. Journalists are able to inform the public of issues, and as a direct result the people become concerned about these issues and call for action. This leads to judicial and or legislative action, and the law is able to be changed through this. One of the most famous examples of a journalist's work leading to a change in the law is when Ida Tarbell made it known to the public that Standard Oil was a monopoly, later causing the supreme court to break the company up. Tarbell was a writer for the magazine McClure's Magazine, where she wrote he piece on the Standard Oil company. She spent years doing extensive research about the company and is considered one of the first investigative journalists. Through her research, she found that Standard Oil was a monopoly in the oil industry and had become that way through unethical practices. She published her research in the magazine, and it was later compiled into a book. American citizens were fascinated and outraged by her findings, and this led to the Supreme court's involvement. Kathleen Brady, a former reporter for Time magazine and author of the book Ida Tarbell: Portrait of a Muckraker talks about Tarbell's impact in an article for PBS. She writes that, In 1906, the U.S. government, drawing on information [Tarbell] had uncovered in several states, brought suit against Rockefeller's company under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. In 1911, the Supreme Court found that the Standard Oil Company constituted a monopoly and had restrained trade unduly. It ordered the company to divest itself of its major holdings 33 companies in all (Brady 2017). Ida Tarbell's work as an investigative journalist helped push the government to respond to Standard Oil's monopoly. Without her investigation, it could have been a much longer time until Standard Oil was brought down. As Brady states, the government drew from information that she discovered when making their suit, information that would have not been known had it not been for Tarbell's work as an investigative journalist. This shows the impact that journalism can have on the government. In the hundred years since Tarbell's work as a journalist, reporters have continued the trend of having their work act as a reason for change in the government. Through their work, journalists are able to bring light to issues, and once people are aware of the issue they can push for change. The government then takes action, drawing information from journalists, and through court cases and new laws they are able to change society for the better. Just as Journalism has influence over the government, the government also has influence over journalism's power. One famous example of this is the government's attempt to stop the publication of The Pentagon Papers. The papers were classified documentation on The United States' political and military relations with Vietnam. The movie The Post depicts The Washington Post's involvement and efforts in publication of the papers. In the movie, journalists from the post must decide whether to publish the information they have regarding the papers. They realize that publication of these papers could cause the government to sue them, which would result in the loss of the company. In the end it is decided that the publication of the truth is what is most important, and they go ahead with publishing the papers. The Washington Post was not the only news source to publish these, as The New York Times had as well right before they did. When The New York Times began to publish these documents, the government fought back by attempting to block further publication of the papers. In a review of the book The Day The Presses Stopped, Joseph Becker explains the government's reasoning for wanting to block the publication. He writes that, the Papers proved government deception about the aims and conduct of the war...Injecting fuel into the fire of Nixon's old animus for the Times, he provoked an order to the Department of Justice to stop further publication (Becker 1997). The information contained in the Pentagon Papers was classified information, and the government did not wish for the public to have this information. In the papers were details about the Vietnam war that were not released to the public, and if this information was made available public opinion on the war and of the government would change. To combat this, the government called for the papers to cease publication, under the reasoning of national security. Immediately, The New York Times went to the Supreme Court to try and get this issue resolved so they could continue publication. Under the First Amendment, they had the right to freedom of the press and felt they should be legally allowed to publish the papers without government interference. The Supreme Court took the case, and the result of New York Times Company v United States ruled in the press's favor and unblocked them from publication. This ruling is very important to journalism because it reaffirms the fact that the press is not to be censored. The government has a lot of power, but their power over the press is limited because of the First Amendment. This is for the best because without fear of censorship journalists can do their job and get information out there for people to take in. The role of journalists is to inform the public of what is happening in the world, and the government is not usually able to stop this. However, there are still circumstances that the government can legally prevent the press from publishing information. The government has the power of prior restraint, which is preventing information from being published before it happens. Prior restraint cannot be used at random, as that would violate the first amendment freedom of the press. It can only be used in specific circumstances, such as national security. If the government knows that information is about to be published that will put the security of the country in danger, they can ban it from ever being published in the first place because of prior restraint. In situations such as war, the government can also limit the power of journalists. During the Persian Gulf War, restrictions were placed on journalists covering the war. An essay from the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review discusses this. In the essay, the author states that, During the Persian Gulf War, the Pentagon imposed the tightest restrictions on battlefield press coverage in American military history. The restrictions subjected all news gathered to a security review before it could be published and severely restricted media access to the battlefield (Boydston 1992). Here the government is restricting what journalists can do. Under these restrictions journalists were unable to easily access information, and the information that they could get was subject to review. This severely limits the effectiveness of journalism in this situation. By being under restriction, they cannot effectively do their job of informing people of what is going on. This is a perfect example of the government having power and influence over journalism. Journalists could not do anything about the restrictions and had no choice but to let the government limit them. Just as journalists have power over the government, the government also has power over journalists. To conclude, journalism has a huge importance to the government. Through their work, journalists are able to impact the government in a variety of ways. One impact they have is on politicians themselves, when journalists uncover scandals and expose government corruption, such as what happened in Watergate. Another impact that journalists have is influence over the law, seen through Ida Tarbell's journalism lending itself to a supreme court decision. While journalism impacts the government, the government can also impact and have influence over journalism, seen through the governments failed attempt at ceasing publication of the Pentagon Papers, and through there restrictions placed on journalists during the Persian Gulf war. Overall, journalism has a strong influence over the government, and because of the first amendment right to freedom of the press, the government is limited in what restrictions they can place on journalism, meaning journalism's influence and power will last a long time.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

A journalism and a government. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Journalism as a Source of Truth

Journalists are the guardians of truth. We have an obligation to conduct an honest, unbiased and informed analysis of information and then to present the facts. This will lead the reader to the truth. I argue that this relentless pursuit of the truth makes journalism the fourth branch of a democratic government. By providing the masses a source of truth, journalism acts as a check and balance to the political and economic power in society. The journalistic journey to the truth often exposes the wrongful actions of the powerful. For example, in 2002 journalists held the Catholic Church accountable for the sexual abuse of children by priests and the subsequent cover-up by Church leaders. In 1972, the award winning reporting of the break-in of the Democratic headquarters resulted in the resignation of President Nixon. Furthermore, Ronan Farrows’ work in The New Yorker exposed the abuse of power by an iconic Hollywood powerbroker that unearthed widespread sexual assault by men in power and helped ignite the #metoo movement. Similar to the surgeon that conducts a biopsy, the journalist often conducts a societal or institutional biopsy in reporting a story. As mentioned, the Boston Globe’s January 6, 2002 expose on the sexual abuses within the Catholic Church shook the church to its core. The haunting story of widespread sexual abuse and a systemic failure to take action against the abusers led to Cardinal Law’s resignation and a global crisis that continues to plague the Catholic Church. The Boston Globe’s award winning journalism on this issue came more than a decade after American bishops first pledged to prevent sexual abuse. The far-reaching impact of the journalistic investigations into the Catholic Church resulted in many of its leaders and parishioners demanding reforms as sweeping as those of the Reformation. The Boston Globe story also provides an excellent example of the power of social media to assist in investigative journalism. The Globe’s decision to post church documents on the internet provided readers with evidence that church officials spent decades covering up abuses. As a result of exposing the church’s internal records, other news organizations took hold of the story, thousands of victims came forward, and powerful institutions and individuals were held accountable for their actions. This scandal continues to be revealed by journalists throughout the world, highlighting their role as “the guardians of truth.”
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Journalism as a source of truth. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

About Development Journalism

The 1960s brought bright future, great hope and expectation in Africa. It was a time that many African countries gained their independency from colonial powers. It was a period that the dark ages of colonialism totally collapsed and, a new age of glorious economic growth and intellectual emancipation was started (Odhiambo, 1991). Odhiambo further argued that the newly emerging countries of Arica were set target to regain the lost glory due to colonial powers and enter a new age of restoration and cultural renaissance. The continent's intellectual and political leadership was directed towards rapid socioeconomic development. “Thus socioeconomic development became the historically organic ideology, or the organizing principle, for social policy and program mes. Development was historically given the prevailing structures of postcolonial backwardness and poverty” (Odhiambo, 1991, P. 20). Mass media was considered as a major role player in disseminating government policies in order to bring significant socio-economic development by creating awareness and mobilizing citizens towards the implementation of these policies of the newly-independent countries in Africa. Thus, the concept of development journalism in Africa continent was related to emergency of newly born, independent African states, and these states considered mass media as an integral part of their development concerns. According to Banda (2007), the emergency of development journalism in African context is traced back to the evolution of development communication theories namely, modernization”, dependency and multiplicity paradigms (See section 2.3.1). Following the strong criticism against modernization paradigm which saw western model of development as an extremely important and the only path for development in the Third World nations (Melkote 1991), dependency paradigm emerged with the view that the self-determination and an ideological distancing of the newly independent nations of the Third World from Western forms of modernization (Servaes 2002). Inspired with the view of political, economic and cultural self-determination from the western influences, new states of Africa and Asia formed Non-Aligned Nations and this in turn paved ways for the debate on a new world information and communication order (NWICO) (Servaes 2004). The debate further stated the role that African media should have in the world information flow system. “African media systems in the flow of information between and among nations assumed a crescendo in the promulgation of a New Information and Communication Order (NWICO) by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)”( Banda, 2007,P.3). The way that the west press and news agencies cover the events of Africa created discomfort among African nations and in consequence Pan-African News Agency (PANA) was established in 1979 by the organization of the African Union, in order to balance unfair and one directional news treatment of western press and news agencies regarding African issues (Odhiambo, 1991; Banda, 2007; Ismail, 2016). As Bourgault 1994 (in Banda, 2007) pointed out that, the main objective of PANA was correcting already distorted images of the African continent by the western media agencies and hence, making African voices heard in the international news scene. During dependency paradigm time, Africans had tried to establish their own media theory called revolutionary theory’ of the press, adopted by Nkrumah of Ghana, Nyerere of Tanzania and Kaunda of Zambia. Specifically “Nkrumah articulated this theory in 1963 during the Second Conference of African Journalists” (Banda, 2007, P.22). The primary purpose of the African revolutionary theory of the press according to Nkrumah was supporting African revolutionary struggle for establishing free political and economic system in the continent. The theory supports state control of the media which is different from colonial period media ownership style (Ibid). Thus, the revolutionary journalism was an earlier version of development journalism. Through this process and with the aim of making media to become a tool for exhorting positive social change by encouraging and promoting development initiatives sponsored by local and foreign governments and international organizations, the concept of development journalism flourished in African continent starting from 1970s. Thus, according Xiaoge, (2009b in Solomon 2014, P. 12) “the success of the UNESCO-sponsored projects such as Radio Rural Forums in India, Ghana and Costa Rica accelerated the growth and popularity of development journalism.” Similarly, as Skjerdal (2011), pointed out that various African leaders adopted the concept of development journalism by making it fit to their government systems like military, one-party democracy style, autocratic, and multiparty systems. In fact, the practice of media in general and development journalism in particular remain ‘loyal to the government journalism’ or ‘government say-so journalism in many African countries (Solomon, 2014). Damatob & Hall, 1983; Odhiambo, 1991 (in Solomon, 2014, P. 13) further argued that “Perhaps due to this resemblance between these African journalism philosophies and development journalism, development journalism was hijacked by African leaders who used it to advance their own (mostly dictatorial).” Though, most of the African media are alleged as being mouthpieces of government, it has been playing pivotal role in uniting the people and promoting development based on development journalism practice. Therefore, the concept of development journalism in African context is not new and hence, referred back to the time that African countries took over the power from the colonials with the beginning of a new age of economic growth.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

About development journalism. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

History of Jazz

The room is quiet as the players get on stage. The company is filled with a pianist, horn, drums, upright bass, and saxophone. They start to play, the horn taking the head improvising as the rest of the company played supporting the horn. It then the sax takes over the solo as the rest of players backed them up. This repeats throughout the piece, the musicians putting a little bit of themselves into the solos.

This is jazz, the style of music where players weave melodies and harmonies. A style where improvising is king and has given birth to man stiles during his reign. This paper will dive into the history of jazz starting with its birth to now, and how it affected the players and events around it.

New Orleans the home to Mardi Gras is the birthplace of jazz. Jazz was created when immigrants from all nations and all stations came to together to form a new sound, an example of this is in the book The History of Jazz by Ted Gioia, The dances in Congo Square were a nexus where opposites collided. So much like the city that gave birth to it, jazz was a mixture of all different cultures that came together to make a new sound.

One of the first to make this new sound was Buddy Bolden, who has been thought of as the father of jazz. (Gioia, 2011)His new creation was described as, that he was loud, and second, that his music opened the door to improvisation. "His combination of charisma and playing style is what put it over," he said. (Cieply, 2007) So like the birthplace of jazz, the creator of jazz mixed his own playing and aptitude to make this new style great.

Jazz at first was dived into two styles, New Orleans Jazz and Dixie land which had their share of bands one of which was the King Oliver's Creole Jazz Band. The band would play in the style of Dixie land which meant that the pieces would focus more on ensemble work then the soloists in their pieces. Also, Dixie jazz would have a raw sound to it and a linear style according to the History of Jazz.
Yet like fall when the leaves change so did the jazz when Lewis Armstrong's Hot Fives and Sevens records came out. Instead of a tight-knit artist who played together in a big band, Armstrong called forth artists who were not in a big band and worked together with them to make a new sound for jazz. This sound was different, gone was the idea of playing together as an ensemble as in Dixieland or New Orleans jazz, no now there was a solo line which went over the rest of band and stuck out with its own rhythm and notes. (Gioia, 2011)

In the vein of Armstrong Duke Ellington's band was created not by people who played together for years, but those who were special in their playing. (Gioia, 2011) In some cases, he considered how an artist would play into writing music his band, an alto solo was not just for any alto, but for the particularly breathless play of Johnny Hodges. (Epstein, 1999). This gives his music a different sound than other jazz bands because of the uniqueness of the sound. In some cases, he was ahead of his time, using people's different strengths to make something good, almost like some of the songs that are broadcast over the radio today.

Also, during Ellington's day there was a King of Swing, and his name was Benny Goodman. Goodman rose to power because of his personality and his great ability to play music. Yet his rise of fame came to a head during 1935 where, Goodman's eventual triumph??” signaled by his breakthrough performance at the Palomar Ballroom in Los Angeles. (Gioia, 2011) During this performance, Goodman had given birth to the swing era, an era with very good music to dance too.

After Swing, a new underground movement was taken place. A style that focused on the lower part in the pieces and complex melodies. This style was called bebop and longer solos and faster tempos that its brother swing had. It was so out there during its time that those who played it were called rebels. (Gioia, 2011)

Charlie Parker was one of these rebels who had a comeback story to start off his carrier. The first jam session he played at went very badly and he was laughed out of the rehearsal room. He did come back years later and got a job with Buster Smith's band as a 2nd alto according to book The History of Jazz. Though after a stent of being in New York he could not function, so he had to move back to his home to help create bebop. (Gioia, 2011)

It was not just the composition and solos in bebop that was different, it was the piano playing too. The piano style was created in the mid-1940s and focused more on a pure tone type sound, instead of the muddled tones of Tatum and Elton used during their hay day. During this time the right hand was the star over the left and was given chromic overtones and rhythmic fumes while the left just played a simple chord or melody underneath it, which caused bebop to have the kick it needs to have the right sound. (Gioia, 2011)

One of the artists who took the bebop piano was Bud Powell, who was described as the soul of bebop movement. His playing reconstructed the way that jazz players would play the piano forever. His influence may have been a whisper, but it still holds today. Yet like many players before him, he got into the drug crazy and his playing became muddy and filled with chaos which was not present in his first works. (Gioia, 2011)

Thelonious Monk was another bebopper whose carrier was the opposite of Powell. Monk started out in the 1940s and '50s as a forgotten player but found his footing in the 1950s when he became the voice of bebop. (Gioia, 2011) In an article by Sean Spence described the pianist playing as, instantly recognizable, sounding as if the modernist Schoenberg had inherited the jazz tradition of Fats Waller: angular music, jangling with discordant note clusters, set over jerking rhythms which nevertheless seem to "swing. (Spence, 1998) In other words, Thelonious Monk's playing was a great example of how bebop music was to be played. Bebop was a class of music that should be played with personality.

"Take Five, a record by Paul Desmond was created during this time. It was different from many songs that came before it because it was created with unusual time signatures and blended jazz with classical music. The piece also had thick harmonies and thanks to Desmond's playing had smooth jazz tones playing over it. Dave Brubeck, on the other hand, had more of a playful tone to his playing and loved experimenting with new sounds. (Gioia, 2011) Both Brubeck and Desmond were working hard to expand the style of jazz from what it was known for.

In this idea of expanding what jazz was known for might have led to the idea of Fragmentation. Fragmentation means separating into different groups, for jazz that meant dividing up into hard bop, West Coast Jazz, Soul Jazz, Modern Jazz, third stream jazz and Free jazz. This idea was brought to the front with the album: Birth of Cool, which explored the style of cool Jazz. This idea of cool jazz was almost like bebop in its rise starting off as an underground movement in jazz but speared headed by the younger generation with artists like Miles Davis, along with many others like Gerry Mulligan, Stan Getz, Paul Desmond and Art Pepper (Gioia, 2011).

During the time when Cool Jazz came out another jazz which combined the Latin beats of samba with cool smooth notes of jazz came into being. (Gioia, 2011)This craze was called bossa nova and it can be described as, It comes from a kind of silence. ... It comes from beautiful silence and beautiful meditation. You listen, and you feel like you are watching the sea," adds Donato... (Reich, 2008) This description is accurate because Bossa Nova had a subdued tone with challenging harmonies and fine solos according to the article by Berry Kernfeld. (Kernfeld, 2008). It was this sound that caused both Charlie Byrd and with Stan Getz to bring the sound over to the United States.

During this time both Miles Davis and John Coltrane were at the height of their popularity in the different playing styles. Coltrane's style was more improvisation, an example of this would be his recording, Kind of Blue. The recording used scales instead of cords and this gave more freedom to the soloists who had to play difficult solos, according to The History of Jazz. Davis on the other hand when compared to Coltrane played his trumpet with focus and usually went up and down scales like the video, "So What" where both Coltrane and Davis played together. (Davis, 1959)

Speaking of Miles Davis playing, one of his sidemen helped pave the way for both Hard bop and soul jazz and his name was Art Blacky. Blacky started as a piano player but moved into drums when the band he was playing in got a new piano player. His drum playing spurred new sounds for the jazz crazy according to The History of Jazz. Blacky was not the only person who worked to change jazz another was Charles Mingus.

Charles Mingus was a traditional jazz player who would tinker with the legacies of the past and was partly progressive without the freedom principal that had been going on through jazz. According to The History of Jazz Mingus playing was a style without a style. This was because his melody was bent out of shape and his counterpoint was a sassy sound that was different from the pieces during that time.

The change in style was not just in the horns or piano but in guitars as well. From Kenny Burrell and Grant Green who changed how guitar playing was viewed to West Montgomery who combined commercial and street jazz. Montgomery also created new ways of playing the guitar according to The History of Jazz by playing the said instrument with his thumb.

Society along with artist changed Jazz, and a prime example of this is Free Jazz it. In the 1960s the Civil Rights Movement was on the rise, and music like in other times started to reflect it. That is what caused the birth of Free Jazz, the example of music that reflected what was happening in society. (Gioia, 2011) The music also was getting away from harmony and the construction of music that was going on that time. Almost like those who marched for equal rights during the same time going against what society thought was right during that time. One of the ones who did this type of construction was Ornette Coleman, an artist whose sound was described as a hocking shouting ruffing sound which stayed on one note or came out as a guttural howl (Gioia, 2011) This sound seemed to be a good simile for what was happening around during that time, because many had raised their voices to be heard, almost like they were howling.

After free jazz there came Fusion, the exact opposite of Fragmentation. In the case of fusion was when jazz was combined with other styles of music. One of the first recordings that explored fusion was Bitches Brew by Miles Davis. According to The History of Jazz, the recording was a mix of raw and unfiltered music, rattling discursive, and often unfiltered music. This along with this sound the tracks were over 10 minutes which caused sales to drop for the record.

Other artists who worked with fusion according to The History of Jazz were: Herbie Hancock who along with his headhunters combined disco with jazz, while Tony Williams combined rock- in- roll with jazz. Mahavishnu orchestra directed by John Mclaughnm which combined jazz with Indian music. Another group was the weathermen created by Wayne Shorter and Joe Zawinul used piano and used electric keyboards to created layers in their music and used a compositional -ordinated style (Gioia, 2011)

One thing that stayed constant with most jazz styles was the singer. One of the most famous singers was Billie Holiday whose voice according to The History of Jazz had a very small range, and half octaves and her voice did not project well. What made her great though was her timing and how her voice could connect with the music to make it her own. This changed however when she got addicted to drugs and her voice seemed to become dark and scared and it caused her voice to sound rough and become more somber. (Gioia, 2011)

Ella Fitzgerald was another jazz singer that was popular both now and during her time. Her voice in the example of Summer Time was a mixture of hums and low tones which make the song flow, also the raspy sound in her voice gives the song more meaning. (Du Bose Heyward, 1968). It is one of the few voices that could tell a story that people would want to hear.

Jazz like other music had its own battle between the new and old ways of thinking. This was described as Postmodern vs. Traditional practices. Postmodern artists focused more sound and mixing jazz with other styles according to the History of jazz. Some groups that practiced Postmodern styles were: AACM, Steve Coey, Threadgill, and Guerilla Jazz where old approaches were used to make new music. There was also an artist named Braxton who went farther than the other artist by taking music from both African and European music. (Gioia, 2011)

Wynton Marsalis was another postmodern jazz artist. According to The History of Jazz Wynton rise into fame started when he was a teenager and played with the Haydn Trumpet Concerto with the New Orleans Philharmonic band. (Gioia, 2011) Using this stepping stone, he became a Grammy award-winning artist in both Classic and Jazz styles. He also tried to combine both postmodern and the roots of jazz together. Marsalis even became the artistic director of the Lincoln Center and was named as a jazz ambassador.

Jazz is popular even now even though it has changed a bit, both the United States and Europe still have a heart for it though. Jazz now is sometimes making recordings using software instead of living players to perform, which can be equal to the greats that had come before, according to the History of Jazz. Also, since the rise of technology induvial artist can record records and share them online without the aid of a label. (Gioia, 2011) This means more money for those artists who want to branch out and do their own thing to change jazz. Even though it has gone more into a technology era, jazz is still affected by what happens in society. A recent example of this would be the dark and somber sounds in jazz after the events of 9/11. (Gioia, 2011)

Jazz also has switch popularity in recent years. The History of Jazz comments that once jazz was favored more in America than Europe during the start of jazz. This has changed now jazz is the main form in Europe bosting more fame than it is America now. In the old days those who played jazz in Europe would go over to America to get more pay and recognition, now it is the opposite. (Gioia, 2011) In other words, if a jazz artist wants to make it big, they need to go to the festivals in Europe that celebrate the jazz is the right way to go. It would be either that or go into a time machine back to when Jazz first became popular in the United States.

Jazz, a style of music that changed throughout the years but still has the same heart. It has gone through many styles and has given birth to many great artists in its run. Jazz was created from a mixture of history and styles and moved throughout the world changing with time and what the artist wanted to change it to. Jazz is a wonderful sound, and those who hear will also hear the history that comes with it, which is what music is here for.

Bibliography

  1. Cieply, M. (2007). The elusive man who may have invented jazz. International Herald Tribune, 11. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/318821 561?accountid=11648
  2. Davis, M. (1959). So what. New York, New york, USA . Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diHFEapOr_E
  3. Du Bose Heyward, G. G. (1968). Summer Time [Recorded by E. Fitzgerald].
  4. Epstein, J. (1999, June 4). Ellington's century and a century of Duke. Philadelphia Tribune, 16E. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/337739
  5. Gioia, T. (2011). History of Jazz (Vol. 2nd edition ). New York, New York : Oxford University Press.
  6. Kernfeld, B. (2008). Bozza Nova (Jazz). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com.proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-2000990003#omo-9781561592630-e-2000990003-bibliography-1
  7. Reich, H. (2008). 50 years under the spell of bossa nova. Chicago Tribune, 7.1. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/420685
  8. Spence, S. A. ( 1998). Thelonious Monk: His Life and Music; Straight,No Chaser. The Life and Genius of Thelonious Monk. British Medical Journal, Vol. 317( 7166), 1162. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/177758
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

History of Jazz. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

The History and Makings of Jazz

Jazz is thought to be the smoothest and richest music design of all time. Jazz came from African American communities in New Orleans. Woodwind instruments are mainly used when performing the music genre jazz. In my opinion Jazz is used to express feeling and affection. Jazz is something that the musicians put their heart and soul into. People use to use jazz as a west coast slang term before it officially became a music genre. When a person tries to hear sounds better he/she face problems with hearing the roots in the music. Most people playing Jazz usually find their own rhythmic taste in the way the move and play. The bass in Jazz is usually the lowest sound in bitch. Bass in jazz is usually used on the drum, guitar and some other instruments. The trumpet is the most powerful and useful instrument in playing jazz. When you hear jazz, you should automatically think of the trumpet. The trumpet has the highest register than any other instrument in the brass family. There is more than one trumpet on this earth in which we live in. All of them pretty much have different sounds and different notes in which you can play in them. The trumpet first person to attempt to make the trumpet and bring it into this world was Charles Clagget. The box tubular value was first made new by Heinrich Stoelzel and Fredrich Bluhmel. The most common trumpet is the B, trumpet. A, C,D,E, and F trumpet is also trumpets also. Every trumpet have some different about them with the pieces to the sound. The trumpet has had a real powerful legacy ever since it was created and used for entertainment purposes. Many beginners use a trumpet called the cornet because it is more compressed and easier to play then the B, trumpet. The cornet has a more mellow tone and is swollen compared to the regular trumpet. But this instrument is more likely to be heard doing jazz performances. The piccolo is the smaller but its pitch is very strong and even louder than the B, trumpet. The piccolo often gets confused with the pocket trumpet. Both are very small put the piccolo has a short stature from the other trumpets. This instrument has a nice tone quality according to some listeners. The piccolo also produces warm sounds. piccolo also produces warm sounds. One of the ways to learn how to play Jazz and get the technique down is to listen to others play. The concept of Jazz can be very hard to learn and it takes a very long study time to master. The chords of Jazz are taught based on how the chords relate to each other and how well they can sound when put together. When learning about jazz you should look who are the composers of the work you are looking at and also be very familiar of where the work originated and where his/her ideas came from. In Jazz you must have to have a rhythmic section that can play in stylistically manner. Playing Jazz include learning a whole bunch of different notes and some are specific for different instruments. In Jazz it is essential that you play full value notes. Missing one note can kill the whole showcase in Jazz. Feelings are involved deeply in jazz music this is why most people take it very seriously. Timing in jazz music is also a big issue. Timing of every note must be on key and the tone of the music must be at a certain level. The drums are also an instrument used in jazz. Playing the drum, you have to have a rhythmic setting about yourself. This set the tone for all other instruments. The other instruments should be able to react off the drum timing and rhythmic features The drum is a member of the percussion group. It contains cylinders and symbols in one with two sticks. Most of drums are made of mostly wood, aluminum, and steel. The drum set originated in the 1930s. But people in ancient sumeria was playing drums as early as 3000 B.C The drum has come very far in its time. The drum has come from one cylinder to many and also has included symbols with it. The kit of the drum set has become very popular and have created a lot of fans in Jazz alone. The drug also got sparked up by Ben Duncan. The snare drum has a very deep tone about it and is used to keep the beat going on the drum. Drums can be made by many things and most people use objects just to stimulate them. Some people use tables to act like drums and some people even use their own mouth. Congo drums are also used in jazz culture and is played with just the persons hands. The congo drums are also called the tumbadora. The congo drums are small and narrow and stand tall also. The congo drums are also popular in latin music. The congos are tall like barrels they make a smooth and rhythmic sound. They are nmot as nearly loud as the regular drums. These were very popular in the mid late 1960s they are also used to play music where people like to salsa and dance to also. They are very much used very well with foreign listeners also The person I introduced in the video plays the drum and I know him as my dad. He is extremely talented and very flexible in his ability to play the drum. He has been playing the drum ever since a little boy and learned from watching his dad play. He started playing the drum for church groups and use to get invited to churches just for his ability to play the drum well. Most of the Babies family on his daddy side has some type of musical talent. Eddie Babies Jr grew up in Montgomery Alabama, learning music was his escape out of trouble and stopped him from getting into things that would hold him back from a bright future. My grandad which is his daddy use to own a music group and this group also played Jazz and blues. The group was family oriented and it ended when they became older. Playing the drum passed down to my sister she also contains this gift. Eddie Babies compares being a drummer to weather and how the body reacts like your heart beat. Eddie Babies also says he is very grateful to have that gift because not everyone gets chosen to play music. Eddie Babies also says him to have feelings when playing music. The drum is very essential for everything else to be on key. The tone and the beat of the drum is very special it makes mostly any music piece sound better than it would be without it. He also demonstrates on how people can tell how the people can determine how the drummer feel based on how she/he play. He demonstrates how you have drummers that play hard, some play soft, and some can play in between. In his opinion when playing a drum, he says it can take you away and put you in a fairy tale adventure. He also demonstrates how life without music would be hard and take away the fun times. Many people wouldn't survive without music. Expressing yourself is something that music lets you do with no judgement once so ever. I'm very grateful to have a farther in which plays the drum. One day I hope it might pass down to one of my kids . The music gene skipped me but I still have much respect for it and will always think that life wouldn't be the same without music. Instruments played a vital part in the evolution of jazz and so were people. One instrument that progressed with the times and people playing it, the Saxophone. Adolphe Sax was an instrument inventor who made the brass creation of the Saxophone in 1842. For a while during the 1800's it was used in military bands before it was taken serious by musicians. Though it had a big role in Jazz the Sax also has been seen genres from classical to pop. Just to name a few, Sidney Bechet, Frankie Trumbauer, and Coleman Hawkins, are only a small part of the many influential musicians. Bechet took a virtuosic style to playing the saxophone. He furthered the use of the Sax in the early jazz styles. During the early years of the 1900's Frankie Trumbauer with Bix Beiderbecke brought about another spin to hot jazz. Hot Jazz is the high tempo and blistering creativeness. He and Beiderbecke recorded a song called Singin' the Blues with C-Melody saxophone. Trumbauer influenced a lot of saxophonists with his style of singing. Coleman Hawkins was a star in the Fletcher Henderson Orchestra during the 1920's and 30's. He is known for his hostile tone and how creative his melody was. Hawkins used his advanced knowledge of the vocals helped to start the way for bebop. The saxophone has made many jazz artists such big influences in the music industry today, outside of jazz. Even in this modern age many times it seen in covers of music for pop songs and even some hip-hop from time to time. As time went on and things in the world changed the music changed with it. The saxophone is just one of the instruments that was apart of the evolution of Jazz. While the rise of Jazz music was only the beginning for so many doors to open and new chances to arise. Artists who stepped out to do their own things and change the views on music in their time are reason for jazz having such a large impact on the people in the music industry today. Instruments played a vital part in the evolution of jazz and so were people. One instrument that progressed with the times and people playing it, the Saxophone. Adolphe Sax was an instrument inventor who made the brass creation of the Saxophone in 1842. For a while during the 1800's it was used in military bands before it was taken serious by musicians. Though it had a big role in Jazz the Sax also has been seen genres from classical to pop. Just to name a few, Sidney Bechet, Frankie Trumbauer, and Coleman Hawkins, are only a small part of the many influential musicians. Bechet took a virtuosic style to playing the saxophone. He furthered the use of the Sax in the early jazz styles. During the early years of the 1900's Frankie Trumbauer with Bix Beiderbecke brought about another spin to hot jazz. Hot Jazz is the high tempo and blistering creativeness. He and Beiderbecke recorded a song called Singin' the Blues with C-Melody saxophone. Trumbauer influenced a lot of saxophonists with his style of singing. Coleman Hawkins was a star in the Fletcher Henderson Orchestra during the 1920's and 30's. He is known for his hostile tone and how creative his melody was. Hawkins used his advanced knowledge of the vocals helped to start the way for bebop. The saxophone has made many jazz artists such big influences in the music industry today, outside of jazz. Even in this modern age many times it seen in covers of music for pop songs and even some hip-hop from time to time. As time went on and things in the world changed the music changed with it. The saxophone is just one of the instruments that was apart of the evolution of Jazz. While the rise of Jazz music was only the beginning for so many doors to open and new chances to arise. Artists who stepped out to do their own things and change the views on music in their time are reason for jazz having such a large impact on the people in the music industry today Much like the saxophone the acoustic guitar was apart of the jazz wave and the many influences. The words jazz guitar is usually associated with rich sounds of electric archtop and clean or smooth noises. Most acoustic guitars did not need a pickup, cable, or amplifier. Two main players were Eddie Lang and Django Reinhart, they were apart of the first trend of jazz guitar greats. The unamplified instruments were not around during and a little while after the bebop era, and bossa nova craze helped them to reappear in the 60's. Much like the saxophone the acoustic guitar was apart of the jazz wave and the many influences. The words jazz guitar is usually associated with rich sounds of electric archtop and clean or smooth noises. Most acoustic guitars did not need a pickup, cable, or amplifier. Two main players were Eddie Lang and Django Reinhart, they were apart of the first trend of jazz guitar greats. The unamplified instruments were not around during and a little while after the bebop era, and bossa nova craze helped them to reappear in the 60's. As the jazz-rock combination era came about with guitarists using new bold sounds during the late 1960's and 70's, the electric guitar surprised many traditionalists because bigger and louder amps were used in the changes. Each musician during this era of jazz had their own style with the acoustic guitar, a trend of keeping the natural tone of the acoustic guitar while amplifying the sound. From the 30's to the 70's guitar pickups went from magnetic to piezoelectric and transducers, they all made very different tones. The blending of all three sounds to help make a believable acoustic sound was tried by a lot of players. Even in jazz today acoustic guitars play a vital role. Many older jazz musicians from the 60's and 70's is still around and are being joined by talented younger musicians. The archtop amplified and unamplified is a universal symbol for jazz that is still being made and kept. Jazz was also spread outside of the U.S into European cultures with their spin on traditional jazz. There were also many talented Brazilian musicians that used classical guitars with nylon strings, they impacted American jazz in a big way. Many of them moved to the U.S for good to collaborate with American musicians. Jazz is world renown music styled that has been so influential from the people to the musical instruments they used to make it. It is still prevalent to the music taste of today even though it is not as popular it will always be a classic choice of music with so many variables to the sound.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

The History and Makings of Jazz. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Jazz Concert Report

On 01/12/2018, The Royal Room made the honor to host a unique and spectacular concert on the south part of Seattle. I had never attended any jazz or ensemble concert unitil this day. Their performance was just a show of different harmonies. It is beautiful to see different individuals coming together and form a music group. The beauty of this is everyone brings something spectacular on the table whether it be in dynamics, harmonies or even texture etc. I was not really a jazz fan going in there but after seeing the uniqueness in musical combination of this group I might change my mind on this genre of music. The lounge d©cor was also in sync with the performers style, dim lights in the room with roses at each table made it have a romantic feel. The atmosphere was calm/soothing. An aspect that Captivated me was the show of harmonies. I tremendously enjoyed their performance because of how easy it was to analyze the music. When the first song played, the whole room was well focused. I mean, it is the first song so, we were all trying to analyze what the band had to give our ears for the night. At first, I had no idea what was going on musically. It took me a while to catch on the different sounds. After a while into the songs, I caught that they were singing some songs I was familiar with. So, I took a grasp of the melody that was being played and it instantly put me in a vivacious mood. One of my favorite performances during the whole event, was a showcase a quartet with a tenor sax and a trombone. I thought the music had a very intense and captivating tune. The antiphony was also very strong at the beginning of the music. What was conflicting was the use of minor notes and keys it gave weird noises. I could not stop looking at the saxophone player. He was very adept at was he was doing, and he put a lot of emotions to it. He filled me with satisfaction and admiration with his performance. It was just so obvious about how the musicians were passionate about their performance. The song Pressing the skins had a lot of saxophone playing in between and was very upbeat with a beautiful soothing piano sound. The rhythm gets faster towards the end with a moderate change in dynamics throughout the song.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Jazz concert report. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

History of Jazz to the MTV Age War Peace

In contrast to the stable and economically affluent time of the 1950s, the 1960s and 1970s exhibited a monumental change in ideas and led to culturally tumultuous events. While this was reflected in many ways, one of the most significant illustrations of these changes is seen in the music of the 1960s and 1970s With the Vietnam war raging, it makes sense that anti-war songs such as “Gimme Shelter” by the Rolling Stones and Arlo Guthrie’s 18 minute classic “Alice’s Restaurant” were popular hits. The music was also reflected in the counter culture that almost synonymously went with the music. All the violence, hate, and death that people saw and experienced in Vietnam led to a rich counter culture of peace, love, and drugs and this is expressed heavily in songs such as Jimi Hendrix’s drug fueled “Purple Haze” and John Lennon’s peace urging “Imagine”. The music also reflected in the civil rights movement, the new divorce laws, and the changing culture of the time.

The average age of an American in 1950 was 35. In contrast, in 1960, the average age of an American was 17. This significant age gap between the older authority and younger, rebellious teens led to a difference in ideology and the start of protests on college campuses. Early protests started over the strict behavioral codes put in place by college administrations, made in attempts to try to stop the promiscuous behavior that clashed with the suburban lifestyle of the 50’s. Having tasted victory when they succeeded in removing the strict regulations set upon them by their university administrations, students moved on to see what other social issues they could change by protesting. It was not very long before students were protesting segregation, the draft, nuclear weapons, and anything and everything in-between.

By the time the 1960s began, the Civil Rights movement was fully underway with “Brown vs Board of Education”, occurring in 1954, and the Civil Rights Act of 1957 being passed at the end of the 1950s. The 1960s started with The Freedom Rides, which took place in 1961, and Martin Luther King Jr’s March on Washington in 1963. Bob Dylan discusses the change in ideology and the growing force of the Civil Rights movement with his 1963 song “The Times They Are A-Changin”. In this song Dylan, says that, “the times they are a-changin'/Come senators, congressmen, Please heed the call/ Don't stand in the doorway, Don't block up the hall/ For he that gets hurt, Will be he who has stalled/There's a battle outside, And it is ragin'/ It'll soon shake your windows, And rattle your walls/For the times they are a-changin'”. By using imagery of a house shaking he shows, metaphorically, that the Civil Rights movement was strong enough to shake a house, and he says that those who stand in the way will only be knocked down. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed soon after ,not only granting more rights to African Americans but to woman as well. Although Southerners originally wrote women’s rights into the Civil Rights Act as an excuse to not vote for the bill (on the pretense of gender rather than race), their plan backfired, causing more people to support (and then vote for) the bill.

The 60s also led to the addition of “No Fault” divorce. Prior to the 1960s in order for a couple to get divorced one of the couple would need to shown to be ‘at fault’ in court. “Faults” by which a marriage could end included alcoholism and adultery. Tammy Wynette sings of the pain she feels from the end of her marriage in her song “D-I-V-O-R-C-E”. Tammy sings “Our D-I-V-O-R-C-E; becomes final today/Me and little J-O-E will be goin' away/I love you both and this will be pure H-E double L for me/Oh, I wish that we could stop this D-I-V-O-R-C-E.”

The counter culture of the 1960s was as pure anti-establishment as could be. Counter Culturists preached peace and love to combat the violence and fear that came from the Vietnam War, and drug culture was a significant part of this. People felt so strongly about the positive effects of drugs that they believed that if everyone smoked marijuana or tried LSD, it would change peoples views enough that they would experience an internal change and no longer be violent. Famous for his incredible guitar playing and use of LSD, Jimi Hendrix sings of his drug fueled visions in his song “Purple Haze”. Hendrix describes the drugs as more confusing than enlightening and it seems almost like he’s crying out when he sings “Purple Haze all in my brain/lately things don't seem the same/actin' funny but I don't know why/'scuse me while I kiss the sky/ Purple Haze all around,/don't know if I'm coming up or down/Am I happy or in misery?/Whatever it is, that girl put a spell on me,”. While Jimi Hendrix’s Purple Haze talks of his experience with drugs, John Lennon’s 1971 song, “Imagine” illustrates the ideals that many of the counter culturists lived by. John Lennon preaches peace by asking listeners to imagine a different world. He sings “Imagine there's no countries, It isn't hard to do/Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion too/Imagine all the people living life in peace, you/You may say I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one/I hope some day you'll join us, And the world will be as one/ Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can/No need for greed or hunger, A brotherhood of man/Imagine all the people sharing all the world, you,/You may say I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one/I hope some day you'll join us/And the world will be as one”. The beliefs Imagine contains are at the core of the activism/counterculture movement with people believing that drugs helped perpetuate and assist people in imagining and realizing this potential perfect world.

While drug culture started fairly harmlessly, with most musicians within the culture simply smoking weed and dropping acid, towards the end of the 1960s ,there was an immergence of a harder drug, heroin, which led to a struggle of addiction and oftentimes death within the music circles. Written in 1967, The Velvet Underground write of their struggles with the never ending craving for the drug. They sing “Heroin, be the death of me/Heroin, it's my wife and it's my life, haha/Because a mainline into my vein/Leads to a center in my head/And then I'm better off than dead, Because when the smack begins to flow/I really don't care anymore/About all the Jim-Jims in this town/And all the politicians making crazy sounds/ And everybody putting everybody else down/And all the dead bodies piled up in mounds/Cause when the smack begins to flow/And I really don't care anymore.”. The Velvet Underground show how they lose themselves in the drug and how they just don’t seem to care anymore about things they once cared about. The line “And all the dead bodies piled up in mounds/ Cause when the smack begins to flow/And I really don't care anymore” is particularly haunting as it could either refer to the ever-rising body count of American troops in Vietnam, or to the other counter culturists who were also suffering and dying from using heroin.

The anti-war movement can be seen within the popular protest song of the time “Gimme Shelter” by the Rolling Stones. Mick Jaeger warns of how close the war is by singing “Oh, a storm is threat'ning, My very life today/If I don't get some shelter, Oh yeah, I'm gonna fade away/War, children, it's just a shot away, It's just a shot away/War, children, it's just a shot away, It's just a shot away/Ooh, see the fire is sweepin', Our very, street today/Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bull lost your way”. The storm he refers to that is threatening his way of life is the Vietnam war which is “only a shot away”. At the time of it’s release in 1969, the U.S. had already lost a significant amount of pro-war support due to the United States’ defeat in the Tet Offensive occurring in 1968 and it was around this time that the very unpopular military draft became instated. With the excess fear and televised loss of life that came with the war few people wanted to go to Vietnam and even fewer wanted to be drafted. People talked about different ways they could to trick the proctors of the military screening into thinking that they were unfit for combat and Arlo Guthrie’s 18 minute masterpiece “Alice’s Restaurant” is about his draft avoidance and how he got out of going to Vietnam. Arlo’s style of singing is part spoken story telling with sung hooks here and there. Arlo tell’s of the draft in New York singing “I'm here to talk about the draft, They got a buildin' down in New York City called Whitehall Street, where you , Walk in, you get injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected and selected!, I went down and got my physical examination one day, and I walked in, sat Down (got good and drunk the night before, so I looked and felt my best when I went in that morning, 'cause I wanted to look like the All-American Kid From New York City. I wanted to feel like I wanted to be the All-american Kid from New York), and I walked in, sat down, I was hung down Brung down, hung up and all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly things


And I walked in, I sat down, they gave me a piece of paper that said "Kid See the psychiatrist in room 604"
I went up there, I said, "Shrink, I want to kill. I want to kill! I want to see Blood and gore and guts and veins in my teeth! Eat dead, burnt bodies! I Mean Kill. Kill!"

And I started jumpin' up and down, yellin' "KILL! Kill!" and he started Jumpin' up and down with me, and we was both jumpin' up and down, yellin' "Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill!" and the sergeant came over, pinned a medal on me Sent me down the hall, said "You're our boy". Didn't feel too good about it

Proceeded down the hall, gettin' more injections, inspections, detections Neglections, and all kinds of stuff that they was doin' to me at the thing There, and I was there for two hours three hours four hours I was There for a long time goin' through all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly thingsAnd I was just havin' a tough time there, and they was inspectin', Injectin', every single part of me, and they was leavin' no part untouched!

Proceeded through, and I finally came to see the very last man. I walked in, Sat down, after a whole big thing there. I walked up, and I said, "what do You want?" He said, "kid, we only got one question, have you ever been Arrested?". At this point in the story Arlo recalls the time he was arrested for littering and recounts the entire story again before they tell him that he can’t be in the military if he’s been convicted of a crime. This song is comical and light but truly shows a lot of the fear that people were feeling at the time. The Vietnam was loosing more and more support and with draft, a lot people who didn’t want to a part of it had to become a part of it or face incarceration for evading the draft.

As the U.S. rolls into the 1970s Richard Nixon uses the anti-government mindset from the 1960s to push the idea of privatization in the 1970s. Privatization is the idea that the private sector can do everything better than the government can and this led to massive amounts of deregulation across multiple industries. This led to the popularization of commercial flight as well as creating better gym’s and healthcare in the country.

Although the 1960s and 1970s were a turbulent time in American the backlash to the authorities led to a rich culture of music. This music reflects the feelings of the times in relation to the war, the Civil Rights movement, the drug fueled counter culture, and everything in between, conveying both fear, as well as the love and the changes that were occurring.

Works Cited

  1. Anderson, Terry H. The Sixties . 4th ed., Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

History of Jazz to the MTV Age War Peace. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Music Autobiography

All great trumpet players are equipped with confidence. Dizzy Gillespie, Louis Armstrong, and other great players had to cultivate it within themselves to be successful; their careers were riding on their ability to play without hesitation. One thing that many student players struggle with is self-confidence in their playing ability. I should know, as I was classified as one of those players during my sophomore year of high school. I enrolled into a jazz improvisation class for the year. At first I thought the class would be playing big band pieces, where soloing was at a minimum. I soon realized that this was not the case; the entire class structure was strictly improvisation. I was pushed out of my comfort zone. No longer could I be the type of player who thrived only while playing within a group, never seeking the spotlight or speaking for himself. I was an introvert in class and out with friends, and all that was coming to a crashing end. At the beginning of the year, everyone had a basic idea on how to improvise. We all played off a generic blues scale; it sounded alright when we went through the pieces. However, Mr. Ash had different plans for us. As the semester continued, he challenged us to move from the basic blues to permutations, transcribing solos, scales in thirds, and popular licks. I could no longer just play the blues, I had to adapt to bebop and hard bop. I practiced day in and day out for this class, listening to the greats like Miles Davis and Chet Baker; one of my favorites being Chet's take on Summertime in B. Transcribing a solo every few weeks became a habit. My playing was not the only thing improving with my practicing and soloing. My attitude and personality blossomed like it never had before; I started to be more involved in class activities, communicate more effectively with my classmates and become more efficient overall. Through my playing, I became a more defined and refined person. The day of the final jazz performance was when I actually realized how much I had grown. It was 7:00 pm when the concert started. The improvisation class performed first; we opened with Bb Blues, the standard key for our group. As everyone was running through their solos, I found myself constructing my own solo, one that would showcase my best playing and performance abilities. Three people before my turn and I had an idea of what I was going to play. Then two, then one and then the spotlight was on me. I played my heart out that night, making sure I said everything that I wanted to say musically. I did, as great musicians say, leave it all on the stage. I finished my solo and felt the pride one feels with great accomplishment. I couldn't stop smiling, overjoyed with what I had just performed. In that exact moment, I understood how much I had grown from a quiet, reserved boy into the assertive, self-confident young man that I am today. Some onstage played softly that night. But not me. I played loudly, never to be quieted again.
Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Music Autobiography. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Americans Wanted Muslims

At the mention of September 11, 2001, most people's minds instantly flash back to the visual of planes flying, buildings smoking, immense pain, and the hateful acts of United States enemies. This date in history has been defined as the occurrence of an act of terrorism that was carried out by members of the Islamic faith. Terrorism has become associated with the ideas of brutality, hate, and tyrannical killing of innocent souls; the stereotype is that Islam encourages and supports these acts, and it has led to Western dissent towards the religion. A Pew poll from September 2007 showed that 35% of Americans possessed an unfavorable perception of Muslims, and an August 2007 Financial Times/Harris Poll found that 21% of Americans consider the presence of Muslims in this country as a national security threat.

Furthermore, a 2006 USA Today/Gallup poll revealed that 39% of Americans wanted Muslims to hold special identification cards and found that almost half of Americans feel that Muslims are extremists. Nearly one-fourth of those polled expressed not wanting a Muslim as a neighbor. Less than half think that Muslims would stand the test of loyalty to the United States. These numbers have only risen, as a 2009 Washington Post/ABC poll found that 48% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of Islam ad nearly 30% thought that Islam encourages violence. This number has since doubled in light of recent developments in terrorism.

As Colin Chapman points out in his book Islamic Terrorism' Is there a Christian Response, we must question if this perception represents the truth and ask: do we understand in its entirety how terrorism relates to Islam? Many scholars have written on this issue, discussing how the common perspective of terrorism characterizes Islam as violent and clouds it's identity as a peaceful religion.

In his book Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea, Shiraz Maher argues that there is an urgent need to better understand the beliefs that underlie Islamic terrorism, especially with the modern-day relevance to the struggle for power and propagation of religion in the Middle East. These Islamist acts of terror can be traced to the roots of Salafi-Jihadism. Some people view all Muslims as under the umbrella of violent Islamists based on examples seen in the media of individuals like Osama bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, and the radical Islamic State (ISIS). On the other hand, some individuals such as George W. Bush viewed Islam as a religion of peace.

The essay has a two-fold agenda. First, I argue that there is strong evidence that Islamist Terrorism is rooted in Qur'anic text and Jihadist religious belief. The work of Shiraz Maher has defined and addressed Salafi-Jihadism in the context of terrorist ideology, and other Islamic scholars have also introduced and dissected the different beliefs and practices of violent and nonviolent Islamic groups. Second, I argue that Islam is not a religion of sole violence or sole peace, and that the reality lies somewhere in the middle.

Violent extremists and pacifists in the faith draw their ideologies from similar religious texts and ideologies, however it is their interpretation of these texts that leads to the variation in belief and practice among members of the faith.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Americans Wanted Muslims. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Definitions of Terrorism Utilized

For centuries, fear has been used as a tactic to gain political power, oppress religious groups, and, in some cases, fight social injustice. The early first century Sicarii employed fear and murder in order to overthrow the Roman rule and gain religious freedom. In 1605, Guy Fawkes attempted to terrorize the House of Lords in England so that Roman Catholic persecution would end (Roser 1). While mass terror has been viewed as a low priority issue in the past, the alarming increase in terrorism over the past three decades has seized the attention of the world.

These recent events have raised many public questions: What motivates terrorists to commit such egregious acts; and how can humanity combat an undefined enemy, and a suicidal one at that? Terrorism can be considered effective in the sense that its reverberations echo in the lives of the affected for as long as they live; despite this fact, the issue of moral justification arises. Some minority groups claim that there are certain circumstances in which terrorism is justifiable while many victims of grotesque acts of terror adamantly advocate the opposite; those who commit acts of terror are indeed monsters regardless of religious conviction or political motivation. How, exactly, is a terrorist defined? Due to the complexity of gathering data on terrorists and the perception of positive and negative sides of acts of terrorism, there is no universally agreed upon definition of terrorism.

In fact, there are at least 22 legal definitions of terrorism utilized by the United States Government (Beck 1). A loose definition of a terrorist according to Colin J. Beck, a research student at Pomona College, is any individuals who target citizens and threaten national security (Beck 2). Another definition, used by the United States Government to determine terrorist organizations, limits terrorism to politically motivated violence against noncombatant targets (Beck 3). The inconsistencies in the definitions are important because they determine what groups of people are constantly watched by international governments and those who are simply ignored. The fact that there is no international definition of terrorism strengthens the terrorist's movement because there can be no unified effort against those who would be internationally designated terrorists.

In order to effectively analyze present-day terrorism, it is necessary to understand the origins of the issue and the motives of the perpetrator. One of the first know acts of terror was set off by religious tensions in first century Rome. Nestled in the pressure cooker of the Middle East, an elitist Jewish sect of Zealots known as the Sicarii opposed Roman rule and sought to instill terror in the hearts of law-abiding citizens. The Sicarii stabbed their victims with concealed daggers, thereby creating an uproar in a public area. After the killing, murderers would join in the cries of indignation in order to decrease suspicion and possibility of discovery (Roser 1). These undertakings, motivated by hatred for the anti-Jewish authorities, are comparable to present day terrorism in the Middle East. Another instance of past terrorism is the plot to destroy the House of Lords in England. A secret group of individuals conspired to upseat the ruling party in England in order to reinstate a Catholic Monarch (Roser 1).

The plot, initiated by Robert Catesby, consisted of stockpiling numerous cases of gunpowder in a lower section of the English parliamentary house and igniting the cases when many lords and rulers were present in the chambers above. These religious motives justified the potentially devastating act in the eyes of the criminals, but upon further observation, this logic compromises the original intent. The terrorists in both situations sought to overthrow the powers over them in exchange for their own ideas of ruling in order to benefit the people they represent. These instances of early resistance and terror have defined pre-twentieth century terrorism (Roser 1). There is one event that has greatly altered United States national security in the past twenty years. Arguably the most infamous terrorist attack in recent history is the strike on the World Trade Center towers in New York City, New York on September 11, 2001. Most Americans know the details of this event but few know the stories of two masterminds who planned the operation: Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Osama Bin Laden. One man was consumed with his religion while the other was consumed with achieving political goals.

At one point in Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's life, he was a regular boy growing up in the middle east; however, when he was a teenager, he succumbed to the greatly politicized Muslim Brotherhood. Mohammed became obsessed with the concept of war on religions that oppose Islam at an early age and began to adopt severely anti-American values (Marks 5). Mohammed moved to the United States to pursue an Engineering degree; however, this was clearly not his ultimate goal. He fit the profile of a natural immigrant. Mohammed believed that the United States was weaker than many people suspected so he formed a plot to hijack planes and fly them into significant buildings. According to an interview with Osama Bin Laden, Mohammed was said to have liked the action when planning catastrophic events (Marks 6). He certainly thrived on September 11, 2001.

Osama Bin Laden was quite the opposite of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Laden was a devout follower of Islam, praying seven times a day and fasting twice a week at the age of 13 (Marks 6). In contrast with Mohammed's political motivations, Laden was largely motivated by a religious ideology. His steadfast belief in Islam drove him to lead an attack on one of his primary enemies: the United States (Bergen 2). The partnership between the two men culminated in one of the most devastating acts of terror in recent history. The process Mohammed and Laden went through as younger boys is now known as radicalization and can be defined by favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions (radical def. 3.1.b).

Radicalization is a tactic employed by many terrorist organizations to gain new recruits and can also explain some of the motivations of present-day terrorists. Contrary to popular belief, terrorists are predominantly motivated by political goals rather than religious agendas or otherwise (Roser 1). A psychologist from Pennsylvania State University found common strands between persons who are susceptible to radicalization and terrorist recruitment. Two frequent characteristics are those of perceived disenfranchizement and victimization (DeAngelis 1).

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Definitions Of Terrorism Utilized. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

History’s most Famous Philosophers

Twenty-four centuries ago, Plato, one of history's most famous philosophers, compared the life of individuals solely having opinions and no actual knowledge. In Allegory of the Cave, there are three prisoners tied to a rock that can only look at a stone wall. Behind them is a fire that casts shadows of figures moving onto that stone wall. One day, one of the prisoners escapes and explores outside of the cave. This leads him to new experiences which formulate a new reality apart from the isolation he once knew in the cave.

He then goes back to the cave to tell the other prisoners about his new experiences. Once the others hear what he says, they do not believe him and revolt. Essentially, Plato is trying to convey an allegory about staying in one's mental cave. People imprisoned in this symbolic cave believe only in what they see or hear. However, when these people leave this cave, they gain knowledge and enlightenment. Everyone has a personal cave which is comfortable and can lead to unintentional ignorance. One needs to leave this cave to reach enlightenment. Through the ideas of Plato, Bohm, and Hiner, getting out of one's cave and reaching enlightenment is a complete comprehension of an individual's realm of thought and of the physical world.

Enlightenment is defined differently by writers, philosophers, even by misalliance people on the street. The term enlightenment has been around for centuries and to me, enlightenment is defined as a personal understanding of one's self and others around them. Being enlightened is to be free of one's inner demons influence and, as a consequence, to experience happiness and harmony with the world. In some religions, enlightenment is the end goal of one's existence.

Religious definitions of enlightenment vary by denomination and traditions. In Buddhism, it is said one reaches enlightenment by taking the middle way, which is a part of the eightfold path that leads to liberation of the soul. Then in Hinduism, enlightenment is called the Devine which is when one reaches enlightenment and their individual soul examines the truth of all beings though the Brahman. As a way for me to expel myself from one of my personal caves, I realize the importance of knowing different cultures. I came from a very small town in Indiana and went to a predominantly white high school.

Because of this, it is a goal of mine to free myself of prejudice thoughts and be friends with all different types of backgrounds. Although the Buddhist and Hindu religion offer compelling definitions of paths to enlightenment, in order for me to leave my personal cave, I believe I need to be open-minded, accepting of all backgrounds, and put ego aside when dealing with people. This would eventually aid me in my unique journey towards becoming an individual who is more in tune with their mental processes and the world around them.

Plato's Allegory of the Cave is an example of a story that lets the reader better understand the process of enlightenment. The readers must fully comprehend the allegory to understand what Plato is conveying. The cave itself represents society. The prisoners living in the cave, fixed in the same place, with their necks and legs fettered, able to only see in front of them, represent ignorant people in society (Plato 1). They believe the truth is the shadows that they see until one of them escapes and goes outside the cave to see the sun, filling his eyes (Plato 20). This is a metaphor for seeing the light, which represents knowledge.

He is leaving his cave of ignorance and seeing the absolute truth about the world. However, when the man goes back to the cave, his eyes- coming suddenly out of the sun like that- be filled with darkness (Plato 32). Therefore, the man has a new perspective of the world that is different from his previous one of ignorance in the cave. So, Plato's definition of enlightenment is through advancing the forms of human perception. Through this, a person must know and understand the Absolute Truth. Also, enlightened people must share their knowledge with less enlightened people.

Hence the return of the man to the cave to tell the others in the cave of his experience. Plato's definition of enlightenment is on a philosophical level. Plato's definition compares to my definition by being open-minded. Both definitions put an individual through new challenges in life and to stay out of this mental cave they need to be open-minded. However, knowing the Absolute Truth is a common theme in other philosophers' and writers' definition of enlightenment.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

History's Most Famous Philosophers. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Most of History Humans

Throughout most of history humans have been controlled by absolute monarchies or regimes run by a single family. As well as given very few liberties and the ability to freely live their lives. It wasn't until around the 1500's that certain individuals began to freely think for themselves without the influence of their government and oppressors. Around 1775 the world began to see a major change in the way people think and go about defying their current system of government in the American revolution. But the American revolution didn't start on its own with the masses, it was inspired by certain individuals who had the courage to stand up to their current government and inform the masses of their wrong doings. Writers like Tomas Pain with his Common Sense and free thinkers like John Locke and Benjamin Franklin all gave inspiration to the American Revolution. The United States would not be what it is today without their efforts.

One of the most important documents in American history would be the pamphlet Common Sense written by Tomas Pain. In this document Pain rallies the colonists to support the separation from Great Britain's rule. In the pamphlet he states, I am not induced by motives of pride, party, or resentment to espouse the doctrine of separation and independence; I am clearly, positively, and conscientiously persuaded that it is the true interest of this continent to be so. (Common Sense). While supporting American independence he denounces the British monarchy and says that people are born in a state of equality. Paine also said that there are no natural rulers among men. And that everyone is born equally.

Common Sense gained so much traction in the American revolution that even George Washington read it to his men as inspiration before they went into battle. Not only did he rally the support of the colonists, but he also gave the united states an idea for a representative government to be used in order to replace the old regime. A few months after Common Sense was published the colonies passed the declaration of independence. Without Thomas pain and his ability to rally the colonists, the united states would not be the same country that it is today.

Another influential figure in the American revolution was Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin was a crucial figure in the American revolution because he was able to procure funds for the colonists to fight the British. In 1778, Benjamin Franklin and 2 different Americans became American diplomats in France. Benjamin Franklin met with several French diplomats, policy makers and even King Louis XVI who were all impressed with his thoughts, talents and writings. Because of Benjamin Franklin's extreme influence in France throughout his 10 years there, the country that said they were officially neutral took great measures to help the United States during the Revolutionary War.

During the Revolutionary War, France agreed to lend the United States millions of dollars in aid, which allowed the U.S.warships in its harbors to fight and even let volunteers enlist to fight against British. Franklin was one among 5 members of the Continental Congress to be placed responsible of negotiating an accord between the U.S.and Great Britain. The 1783 accord of Paris was the results of their negotiations. Then in October of 1729, Benjamin Franklin bought the newspaper The Pennsylvania Gazette. With this he was able to push out propaganda for the American revolution. One of his most famous propaganda pieces was the join or die snake in 1754. This political cartoon become a symbol of unity between all the colonies. Benjamin Franklin's ability to unify the colonies and gain financial support from France to the colonies played a crucial part in the success of the revolution.

The last great enlightenment thinker that influenced the American revolution was John Locke. One of Kohn Locke's most important works was the Two treaties of government. According to history.wisc.edu the treaties of government was published in 1689 and attacked the tory beliefs that have been formed in the early seventeenth century. Within the two treaties of government John Locke states that the power of the king or government comes from the people who obey their rules in order to obtain law and security.

The second thing he states is that everyone has a natural right to hold property, which can never be taken without their consent. The last thing he states is that if a ruler decides to infringe on the terms of the contract that empowers or seize property, the people can overthrow and disobey him. Some other ideas that he had were that all men were created equal and was subject to no one but god. Locke also argues that it would be wise of the government to delegate their power to different bodies so that no branch of government would be too powerful. This idea can be seen today with the American government. After the revolution the founding fathers needed to create a government that was able to uphold the rights of the citizens but at the same time not be too powerful. So, what they did was they looked to john Locke's works and idea and used them to established the three branches of government.

The enlightenment era was a very important influencer in the American revolution. The people who had the courage and determination to go against their government and even their way of living, have done a great service to this world. People like Thomas Pain who created common sense and gave inspiration to the men and woman who fought in the revolution, or Benjamin Franklin who was able to turn a neutral country into a great supporter for the Americans. Even John Locke, who gave our founding fathers the ideas of a newly well-constructed government and natural rights, all deserve recognition and praise for their outstanding achievements that helps shaped the country that we know today.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Most Of History Humans. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Rococo Art Movement

Originating in France, the Rococo art movement was incorporated into Italy around the eighteenth century (Columbia Encyclopedia, Italian Art The Rococo Period). During this time, Italy experienced corrupt politics by aristocrats taking hegemonic control of politics and economics in order to maintain their position in society (Britannica, Italy - Reform and Enlightenment). Towards the latter portion of the seventeenth century and throughout the nineteenth century, the Enlightenment era was present in Europe (History: Enlightenment). However, Italy's lack of incorporation of technological and philosophical advancements was apparent in Italy until the nineteenth century because of their setback from manipulated politics and economics (Italian Philosophy).

While corrupt politics and limited opportunities for economic growth were the primary causes for Italy's late implementation of enlightened ideas, many pieces of Italian Rococo art send the message that Italians long for improvement in political, social, and cultural conditions by adopting the ideas of the Enlightenment.

Around 1707, the Italian Rococo artist, Alessandro Magnasco, painted The Tame Magpie, which depicts a magpie being taught to sing by an Italian on a part (see Fig.1). Magnasco's painting is not sublime because the tone of the painting is not serious nor depicts an image of greatness beyond calculation (Tate.org, Sublime). However, the underlying message that Magnasco conveys in this painting is one that containsawe and vastness (Oxford Dictionary of Art and Artists). In The Tame Magpie, the suffering Italians, a worn out column, and a broken arch with an abundance of greenery represents the ruin of Italy, which has the potential and desire to grow out of ruination through the implementation of enlightened ideas that are symbolized by the arrival of the intelligent magpie and the distant sailor.

While Magnasco's painting incorporates faint shades of blue, tan, brown, and green, the brightest component of the painting is the light behind the small dark colored magpie, which highlights the intelligent magpie as a symbol of enlightenment that will help Italy in times of despair. The light directly behind the singing magpie sitting above the brown barrels is of a white coloration that combines featherlike specs of gold. The darkly feathered magpie boldly stands out because it is contrasted by the light behind it. This light derives from the opposite end of the body of water behind the port, alluding that the magpie flew from a distant land. In fact, a magpie is considered by some researchers to be among the most intelligent of all animals, and do not originate from Italy, meaning that the magpie present in the painting flew into Italy from an enlightened land (Earthfire Institute, The Intelligence of Crows and Magpies).

Thus, the land the magpie came from directly links to its intelligence, which is validated by the Metropolitan Museum of Art's description of the painting, people from the fringes of society have gathered to watch the spectacle of a man trying to teach a magpie to sing??”an impossible task. However, unlike many other birds in nature, magpies can be taught how to sing, proving that they are extremely intelligent animals that represent a figure mighty enough to conquer the impossible (Youtube, Magpie Singing). Magnasco's purpose of accentuating the magpie through the usage of light contributes to the broader significance of this intelligence; the magpie is a symbol of hope for an enlightened European empire that will enter and transform Italy to become an innovative country.

While Magnasco promotes the Enlightenment through the magpie, he paints the sun rising over the horizon to display Italy's desire to escape a society that lacks progress for its citizens. To the left of the barrels that maintain the magpie, an arch is made of stone. Visible through the arch is a body of water that reveals the painting is set in a port in Italy. The contrast in color between the brownstone arch with the blue sky and darker blue water allows Magnasco to draw the attention of viewers to see what is between the arch and the port. Evident in the space between the arch is a blue silhouette of a sailor and the sun attempting to shine over the horizon.

Even though the sun is not fully above the horizon, the light that is visible from the horizon line is as far behind the port as is the light behind the magpie. Thus, the magpie's symbol of bringing progress to Italy from an enlightened country connects to the light that peeks over the horizon. The sun's yearning to emit all of its light above the horizon corresponds to Italy's yearning for adopting enlightened ideas into its society but surely, the sun will be able to fully rise over the horizon, meaning that one day Italy will adopt the innovations of the Enlightenment era.

The way in which these advanced ideas will be implemented into Italy in this painting is through the blue sailor that is highlighted by the light over the horizon. On the other side of the barrels, worn-out Italians are juxtaposed by a blue sailor, signifying Italy is facing a time of ruin and will be helped by enlightenment. Four Italians lift their hands towards the singing magpie sitting above the barrels, whereas more Italians are scattered along the port. Each individual's face is discolored, containing dark shadows as well as various shades of brown that contrast their usual tan skin. The shadows and discoloration portray the Italians as dirty individuals, alluding to the notion that they are suffering and live in poverty due to the disconnect with enlightenment that delays progression for the country. Also, the clothing worn by the individuals is torn and worn out; looking at the woman feeding her children, her yellow dress is torn at the shoulders while the man in front of her is wearing oversized clothing.

Combining the discolored shadowed faces of these individuals with their ruined clothing, Magnasco portrays the Italians living in a state of agony. Proving that Italians lived in poor living conditions, wealthy gentlemen on the Grand Tour visited the remains of the Roman Empire and reported that Italian lived in a state of poverty and provincialism (Dickie, Delizia!: The Epic History of the Italians and Their Food). While the sailor is highlighted by the sun's beam of light over the horizon, the afflicted individuals are juxtaposed with the calm sailor. The difference between the untroubled sailor and the aching Italians proves that similar to the magpie, the sailor represents the ability to lift these hurting individuals out of its ruins from the Roman Empire and into a state of prosperity that will be influenced by the innovations of the Enlightenment.

One of the many Italians on the floor of the port is a man who is the center of the painting and extends his long half clothed body to introduce the relationship between the light brightening the agonized Italians and the intelligent magpie's symbol. Looking towards the magpie with faces of despair, the large group of Italians appear to be tired, yet they are not hiding from the light that is shining on them. While the centered man seems to have a light source shining on him, the other citizens on the port are also illuminated with light. However, the light that is shining onto these humans is not the same source of light that is behind the magpie.

This source of light appears to be coming into the painting from the direction the magpie sings in, which presents the Italians as individuals who desire to receive the intelligence and advancements the magpie will provide to them through enlightened ideas. Portraying the Italians as exhausted individuals declares a relationship that exists between the Italians and the magpie's symbol of bringing a state of well-being into Italy. Rather than hiding from the light that is cast onto them, the Italians long to receive the enlightened ideas the magpie will implement into Italy to undergo a transformation from a ruined country to an advanced nation in Europe.

Towering over the Italians on the port's floor is a column containing a broken arch with an abundance of greenery that supports the message that the Italians are suffering amongst their ruins. While the column is tall, the paint on the column appears to have chipped away over the last few years. This implies that the column is a remain of the Roman Empire, which signifies that the Italians are living amongst the ruins of their glorious past. Connected to the column are two arches that branch out in different directions.

However, the arch on the left side of the column is broken. While the broken arch contributes to the ruins of the Roman Empire, it connects to Italy's brokenness that resulted from corrupt aristocrats manipulating politics and economics in their favor; this led to Italy's inability to progress by adopting the ideas of the Enlightenment. On both arches, mossy greenery is growing out of the rock that makes up the arch. The plants that are growing out of the arch are lithophytes, which grow in or on bare rocks but contain dead tissue (World of Flowering.com). Therefore, the greenery does not represent growth, but it is associated with decay.

Magnasco incorporates lithophytes on the arches to emphasize that while the Italians are living amongst its ruins, Italy has decayed instead of having grown out of ruination. Combining the Roman Empire's broken arch and the decaying lithophytes, Magnasco conveys the idea that Italians are suffering by living in a state of desolation alongside their ruins.

If Italy incorporated the technological advancements, social ideas, and lifestyles associated with the Enlightenment movement occurring in other European countries, the empire of Enlightenment would be able to improve Italy. The tiresome Italians, old column, and broken arch enforce the notion that Italy is facing a period of suffering.

However, illuminating the singing magpie and sailor to illustrate a symbol of prosperity that will be brought to Italy creates a connection between light and intelligence for the future of Italy to rise above its ruins of the Roman Empire. The idea of the Italians being able to grow out of a state of agony and develop into an eminent European country through the help of a magpie to become as prosperous as other European nations is one that exceeds comprehension; in other words, this idea Magnasco conveys in the painting is sublime, but the painting itself is not.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Rococo Art Movement. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Social Theologies

Traditional, political, and social theologies and ideals began to change during the Enlightenment movement. Men had always been the dominant race due to being educated, and being job working class citizens. Women were expected to take care of household responsibilities, child bear and finally be a mother. There were few women who were given the chance to be educated before the Enlightenment era. That all changed once feminism took off in the 18th century as well as individualism. The questions raised by Enlightenment thinkers about human powers and limitations have left a legacy so lasting that it is hard to imagine our world without the Enlightenment. (Puchner 5) During the 18th century, individualism, and feminism became popular, women took these ideals and ran with them all the way through the Enlightenment period.

Individualism and rationality began to catch fire during the Enlightenment era. Women became tired of being unequal to men and started to challenge traditional ideals that had been upheld for centuries. Many male thinkers during the Enlightenment period viewed women in a completely different manner, one of these influential people was Roussuau. Take for example Mary Wollstonecraft, she wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Men in 1791, women read it and started to support her ideals such as equality in education. It seems to me that her confidence level boosted and almost became a sign of arrogance.

In 1792, she wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Wollstonecraft argued that marriage was equal to prostitution and the right to be educated was unequal, that led to harsh conditions for women in the 18th century. (Puchner 45) I have to say I agree on the part of education with her. Women deserved the right to get an education. I do not however agree with her statement when she said that marriage is like prostitution. I believe marriage is a relationship between two people of the opposite gender that love each other. Prostitution is very degrading to society. This was one of the first times where women started to stand up for themselves.

Revolution during the Enlightenment period gave women courage to stand up for themselves. Before the Enlightenment period, women's roles were subject to submitting to their husbands, cleaning the house, prepping and cooking meals, and child bearing into motherhood. Women during the Enlightenment still took on these tasks, but also fought for their right to have a voice in society. Their voice was heard through women earning the right to be educated, have a voice in politics, and even writing literature. Women came together and formed Salons which were considered a safe place to discuss politics, literature, and science. During the 18th century women began to expand their horizon, regarding issues they were being discriminated against. Women began to use and inject their voices into society like they never had before.

I think in today's society women don't have to justify themselves as much as they did before and during the Enlightenment. I believe there are certain jobs meant for certain genders and vice versa. The perception has definitely changed from the 18th century to present day. Ideals have differed from then as well as now you see women being the hard job working citizens. Now in today's society, sometimes men in the relationship will be a stay at home dad, doing the things women were told they had to do in the Enlightenment era. Some people in today's society still believe in the traditional ideals that women should take care of the house while men are out in the workplace. Although, women have come a long way since the 18th century, women still have a long journey ahead.

In conclusion, the Enlightenment era was a time of great change. Modifications in science and women's rights were made to give women more rights besides taking care of children and household duties. Women were given more opportunities through civil rights such as, education and responsibility. Although women came a long way during the Enlightenment, authors like Wollstonecraft had only laid down the foundation for what would happen in the future.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Social Theologies. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay

Enlightenment Era

Enlightenment era was when people started to use reason, or logical thinking, rationalism, and science to attack this power. The thinkers of the Enlightenment objected to the absolute power of the royal rulers and of the Roman Catholic church. Many enlightenment ideas deals with human freedom and individual rights. This article talks about the enlightenment era and thinkers who in some way had influenced racism. To say that race and racism are the results of the Enlightenment is unfair at humans did hold slaves or otherwise classified each other prior to the 18th century. People argue that the scientific thought of the Enlightenment created the racial taxonomy and the color-coded, white-over-black ideology with which we are familiar in today.

Even Immanuel Kant a German philosopher who is a central figure in modern philosophy believed that humankind exists in the greatest perfection of whites with great talents while Indians or brown skinned are in the middle. Kant stated that Negroes are the lowest in rank and the peasant in part of the American peoples. John Locke the most popular enlightenment thinker who influenced many nations with his inalienable rights thought also, had a influence of early modern racial thinking because in the second of the treatises, Locke provides a justification for slavery as a result of war, using the same absolute power language that grants slave owners the power of life and death over their slaves. Articles talks about more people knowingly or unknowingly spread the idea of racism during the enlightenment era. Even though enlightenment helped shaped our modern world in science, government and many more, it also shaped the Enlightenment ideas of race and white supremacy today.

The article The Enlightenment's Dark Side is related to the enlightenment period we discussed in class. Enlightenment era where people started to believe in science and reasoning and rebel again absolute monarchs. We also analyzed some enlightenment thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire and many more. John Locke commonly known for his natural laws when he speaks about monarchs aren't chosen by God. Consent of the governed for the protection of natural rights which are life, liberty, and property. Where Rousseau is saying the government is a contract between rulers and people meaning a social contract. Voltaire famous for his wit attacks the church and demanded freedom of speech and religion.

Montesquieu which influenced our three branches of government talks about separation of power. Thomas Hobbes in other hand believed something different then most of the others, he believed that the correct form of government was the absolute monarchy. There were many other enlightenment thinkers who discussed crime, women's rights, and economic progression. The article discussed about the whole enlightenment era and some thinkers like Locke and Kant (philosopher) which we have taken a test on. The connection between the article and the enlightenment is significant because the articles reveal about some words that the thinker like Locke said which we never have thought in depth about and it gives more information about enlightenment.

The article also relates to one of the five themes of modern world history by talking about scientific breakthroughs which impacted the people during the beginning of the 18th century. Their lifestyle changed after they began to go more into logical thinking and science with observations. Most people after realizing the science significance stopped going to church and church started to lose power. This scientific breakthrough spread into other places of the world like America where we used ideas of enlightenment thinker to form our modern government and constitution.

The society in whole started to use observations and asking questions about dive rights and monarchs having power. Where the enlightenment thinkers started persuading more people to follow their ideas. It's shocking to know how enlightenment is used today in influenced the idea of racism. It's unbelievable because a person like John Locke who Thomas Jefferson was inspired by to write the Declaration of Independence felt that slaves had no rights over their life. Its very hard to believe because I love learning of enlightenment as it helped America shape our government and laws. I believe that it was unintentionally said by Locke and Kant about the Native/African Americans.

Did you like this example?

Cite this page

Enlightenment Era. (2019, Nov 28). Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/

Save time with Studydriver!

Get in touch with our top writers for a non-plagiarized essays written to satisfy your needs

Get custom essay
Stop wasting your time searching for samples!
You can find a skilled professional who can write any paper for you.
Get unique paper