Month: November 2019
Affordable Care Act and Universal Healthcare in Sweden
Health care is one of the most controversial topics in American society, today. Countries have opted to form their own health care from being single-payer, two tiered or insurance mandated. Who can say which one is better than the other? In this research paper, I will be doing an in-depth comparison between Sweden's single payer health care plan and the United States' individual mandated plan through the Affordable Care Act. Specifically, this paper will discuss the differences between Sweden and America's health care system, statistics, quality of the care given, and their policies and procedures when it comes to their health care.
Why does the United States not have universal health care? How does Sweden perform with their current health care plan? Is Sweden healthier than the United States? How do the two countries differ in policy? What does the taxation look like for residents in Sweden versus residents in America? What is the overall cost of operation for each system? Which system offers the most coverage to patients? These are just a few of the topics that are needed to fully discuss the differences between these two health care systems.
Sweden has had single-payer, universal health care for sixty-three years, since 1955 (Kanopiadmin, 2013). Meaning that for sixty-three years Sweden has found a way to pay for its nation's health care through resident's taxes and ensure access to quality health care to all who need it (Sampson, 2015). Their residents pay for their own health care and assist those who may not be able to afford health care of their own (Sampson, 2015). Sweden provides health care for a wide range of needs including but not limited to maternal care for expecting mothers, midwives, mental health care, and specific medical specialists (Sampson, 2015). The nation divides the weight of responsibility over three regions of their combined municipalities (Kanopiadmin, 2013). They have a system that seems like it works well but does it really? What do residents think of it?
Swedish Healthcare- Facts
Healthcare in Sweden is idolized by many American people who claim that it is the best system in the world, but is it really? Sweden is a country that is built upon capitalism, much like the United States, but is influenced greatly by socialistic welfare, the idea that the community has a whole should be responsible for itself and others financially (Sampson, 2015). In 2018, Swedish taxpayers paid an average of 61.85% of their personal income to their collecting municipality while the United States only paid 37% of their personal income (Sweden Personal Income Tax Rate, 2018).
This means that due to their high taxation, Sweden's people are paying over half of their income to cover taxes while the United States is only paying 1/3rd of their income. Is this the price for universal healthcare coverage? While Sweden is recognized as having one of the best healthcare systems in the world, it does have a few flaws regardless of cost. While Swedes can afford their healthcare, politicians have yet to figure out how to help residents gain access to healthcare facilities. With a population over 9.07 million, Sweden has a high demand for healthcare but their hospitals have actually reduced the number of beds in their facilities (Sk??l©n, Nordgren,& Annerb?¤ck, 2016). Not only are Swedes now facing the second highest income tax but they are now facing the troubles that come with not having enough room for patients who need to be hospitalized meaning longer waiting lines. How does this compare to the problems America is facing with the Affordable Care Act?
The Affordable Care Act & America- Facts
Healthcare in America is, in my opinion a controversial topic. Everyone has their own opinion of the Affordable Care Act in the American health care system. It is clear that our statistics necessitated a change but has the ACA actually affected our statistics? As with every new concept or idea implemented within the United States government, the Affordable Care Act presented a few mechanical, economic, and social issues (ACA Overview, 2017). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was implemented by President Barack Obama in 2010 (ACA Overview, 2017). According to the ACA Health Care website, the Affordable Care Act provides more affordable healthcare to more Americans. The Affordable Care Act brought more focus to the Iron Triangle of healthcare which consists of cost, quality and access (ACA Overview, 2017). The ACA also brought more awareness to the problems of the current healthcare system. Yet, America still has fewer physicians per person than in most other OECD countries and a lower average of hospital beds per population than almost thirty other countries. In January of 2017 VOX reported that 17 states opted out of expanding their Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act. When the act was first written, it was required that all states must enact the Affordable Care Act, but that was quickly changed due to Medicaid being managed differently in each state (Staff, 2017). Each state has made the decision to enact or refuse ACA for various reasons (Garfield, R., Damico, A., & Orgera, K., 2018) . The ACA has certain provisions that make it required for certain individuals and employers. If those who are required to have coverage under the ACA opt to not file for coverage, they may face certain tax penalties (Garfield, R., Damico, A., & Orgera, K., 2018). A big concern that remained hovering over the ACA change was the national spending and its effect on future spending. It was projected that healthcare spending would reduce but at a slow rate.
Millions of Americans remain uninsured today despite the insurance provided by the Affordable Care Act. Three years after fully implementing ACA, in 2016 it was reported that 27.6 million nonelderly Americans remained uninsured (Kaiser).
The ACA has reduced the number of noninsured Americans but it has not eliminated the group in its entirety. According to the CDC, the uninsured rate has fallen below 10 percent. According to the US Census Bureau, the number of Americans with health insurance was up further to 91.2%.
Some Americans feel that ACA insurance is too expensive so they would rather go uninsured and pay out of pocket. Family Affordable Care Plans vary in pricing depending on many factors. Family size, age of members, location, and income are all factors in the pricing and allocation of ACA. In my opinion, pricing for affordable care is very difficult to understand. One source reports, that the average individual premium is $393 for an individual not receiving subsidies (government funds). The average family premium is $1,021 for a family not receiving subsidies. It is difficult to understand how much of a tax penalty will be given to those who opt out of affordable care. Certain procedures cost more in the United States than any other country, including Sweden (SWE) (Kane, 2012).
In my opinion, these numbers strongly reinforce America's need for better healthcare coverage for all people. To detail the exact coverage of ACA, the act had to undergo a few revisions and was divided into ten titles which draft out the laws of the act. The Affordable Care Act can be difficult to understand but how does the law compare and reflect upon Sweden's universal healthcare system?
Legislation for Sweden's Healthcare and Affordable Care Act
Both countries have heavy legislation concerning healthcare. Ranging from laws concerning pharmaceuticals and overall patient coverage. The major difference between the two countries is the division of coverage. America uses Affordable Care, Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance to insure the American people. Sweden's legislation manly covers patient safety. According to Socialstyrelsen, a Swedish Healthcare Website, all healthcare providers are personally responsible and have legal responsibility for achieving compliance with patient safety regulations and for monitoring their own work between patients and hospitals (Healthcare complaints, n.d.). Socialstyrelsen also states that the Health and Social Care Inspectorate' is the organization which monitors healthcare activities and professionals to ensure that they comply with applicable laws and regulations (Healthcare complaints, n.d.). The Health and Social Care Inspectorate is majorly responsible for health care, public health, social insurance and social issues (Healthcare complaints, n.d.). In 2011, Sweden introduced the Patient Safety Act (2010) which states that health care workers are personally responsible for their own actions (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017). For example, this act would help protect individuals who are harmed or made ill by work related situations which would then be reported to the proper government department which will then determine the course of action to resolve the situation to protect other employees (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017).
Like America, Sweden has legislation that prohibits discrimination based on nationality Sweden also has an equal treatment law which states that all suppliers must have the same access to information (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017). Contrarily, Sweden has legislation which requires suppliers to have transparency when providing information, one that requires proportionality between the contacts and their stated requirements as a supplier (Hjortsberg & Ghatnekar, 2017). America by comparison has been attempting to perfect healthcare for many years. Medicare and Medicaid are government funded programs which seek to provide health insurance to those who cannot afford it, Medicaid, and the elderly over 65 years of age, Medicare (Mazie, 2018). America has laws to protect workers, expecting mothers, veterans and health care professionals (Health Care Law, n.d). Both Sweden and America have legislation that reinforces patient's safety and privacy through HIPAA (Woods, 2014). The Affordable Healthcare Act of 2010 is a more recent development in America which seeks to provide insurance to all American citizens had to undergo a few revisions and had ten titles established which outlined the specific requirements for users and providers (ACA Overview, 2017). These ten titles address affordable health care for all Americans though affordable coverage, the roles of public programs which focused on expanding Medicaid and CHIP (Childern Health Insurance Program), improving the quality and efficiency of health care, preventing of chronic disease and improving public health, health care workforce, transparency and program integrity, improving access to innovative medical therapies, community living assistance services and supports, and finally revenue provisions strengthening quality, affordable care (ACA Overview, 2017) . In my opinion the affordable Care Act was written to cover a wide variety of Americans and it does a great job of ensuring that the needs of those Americans are met by law. While Sweden does not have heavy legislation on healthcare like America, they are monitoring their health care professional through government agencies to ensure optimal patient safety and care (OECD, 2013. While legislation is important, how well have these laws affected how each country spends on health care and compare to each other with other costs?
Sweden and America's Spending
As previously stated, America spends more on healthcare than any other country. The graph below illustrates the healthcare spending compared to forty-four other countries in 2016, six years after the Affordable Care Act was implemented. (Source: OECD Health spending Data)
(Source: The U.S. Spends More Public Money On Healthcare Than Sweden Or Canada, 2017)
America spends more than any other country for private healthcare but actually spends less than two other countries do on public healthcare. While America may be spending more than any other country privately, what are they paying for? America pays more per person for pharmaceuticals than any other country. America also pays its doctors, nurses and specialists more than any other country. The U.S. is also spending more on health care administration than any other country to plan, regulate and manage health systems. In my opinion, this spending gap is due to the high cost of healthcare services and medicine. It costs to have quality care.
( Source: Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014)
Here we see the countries ranked based on various health criteria. America ranks last overall when compared to Sweden who ranks third overall. The U.S only out-ranks Sweden in three categories, overall quality of care, effectiveness of care, and timeliness of care (Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014). America does rank fifth overall in quality of care which speaks strongly to our spending habits in my opinion; while we are spending more our citizens are receiving great care (Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014). I raise the question what good is free universal healthcare if it isn't good, quality healthcare?
Health Statistics Compared
After examining the policy, legislation, facts and spending, how do the two countries differ in success after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act? Statistics such as infant mortality rate, percentage of insured, and effective care. The chart entitled effective care measures depicts different care scenarios and ranks each country based on their care. The U.S. ranks third overall while Sweden is ranked ten out of eleven. This chart was provided by commonwealth in 2014, four years after the Affordable Healthcare Act was implemented. In my opinion one could argue that this proves that ACA helped improve the quality of care in America.
( Source: Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C., 2014)
OECD then reported that America has more hospital beds per 1000 in the population than Sweden. In my opinion, this fact also reinforces the effectiveness and quality of America's healthcare.
Conclusion
Sweden may have universal healthcare but residents are taxed heavily and then receive poor quality of care. The Affordable Care Act provides affordable, quality healthcare to those who need it without heavy taxation. There are positive and negative effects to both plans but ultimately health care remains a controversial topic. After observing the facts discussed throughout this paper I, in my opinion, have determined that the taxation is not fair for universal healthcare, the quality of care is poor, policy and procedure is hard to understand, and it is difficult to receive care when you need it. The Affordable Care Act, however, seems to be lowering costs, improving quality of care, heightening the number of citizens insured but healthcare spending is still the highest without the highest of quality. Faults can be found in both parties but overall it is the citizens who inhabit the country who control the system by being an active voter to decide future laws and being educated about current healthcare systems.
Cite this page
Affordable Care Act and Universal Healthcare in Sweden. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Affordable Care Act and Healthcare Business Strategies
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was an extremely significant law passed in regards to federal healthcare policy and business strategies that are driven by those policies. This act made health insurance accessible to all Americans regardless of their pre-existing conditions. This piece of the act alone has already affected healthcare business strategies. This paper will answer the question in detail and explain how the ways the ACA, in some cases, has already affected healthcare business strategies and will continue to affect healthcare business strategies. The ACA will be explored from its beginning, to passage, to implementation. The advantages and disadvantages of ACA will be discussed in relation to impact on healthcare business strategies.
PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is the official name of what many commonly refer to as the Affordable Care Act, or also known as Obamacare. It is the comprehensive healthcare reform law in the United States that was enacted in March 2010. The primary three goals of the law were to: make health insurance affordable and accessible to more people, expand Medicaid, and promote lower cost, innovative health care delivery methods (Affordable Care). These three goals have the greatest impact on healthcare business strategies. The purpose for these goals were to make near-universal coverage possible; strengthen quality and consumer cost for coverage; strengthening value, efficiency and care quality while cutting out waste; increasing accountability across systems; empowering community-based preventive care on a long-term scale (Rosenbaum).
IMPACT ON HEALTHCARE BUSINESS STRATEGIES
A strategy is plan for moving advantageously from one point to a future point while navigating risk and resistance. In healthcare, strategy focuses on service, growth, quality, financial capital, and human capital. All good strategies begin with goals and objectives. Regarding healthcare strategies, the goals were already determined by the ACA. Implementation is where strategy will be needed for healthcare businesses dealing with ACA objectives (Beckham).
The enactment of ACA added approximately 46 million individuals to the number of people with insurance coverage in America (Rosenbaum). This increase in patients will impact a healthcare business world that is already suffering to obtain and maintain qualified staff (Morrissey). This lack in workforce also strains quality and efficiency, but it creates opportunity for community-based care to become more accessed, (Rosenbaum) which will be discussed later. To counteract the lapse in workforce, the ACA has also provided incentives for those in healthcare to advance their education or obtain continuing education credits (Morrissey). Training strengthens a business's ability to have a qualified staff. Like many other industries that rely on federal funding, budget cuts in states that did not implement the Medicaid expansions leave shortages unmanaged (How The Affordable).
The ACA extends funding to special populations in an effort to increase preventative health that also lowers the cost of healthcare and eases some of the strain felt from the increase in patients (Rosenbaum). Healthcare care business strategists would do well to collaborate with community organization to receive funding but mainly as an attempt to promote prevention, which is typically more cost effective than treatment (Preventive).
In 2015, the ACA's Value Based Purchasing (VBP) program replaced Sustainable Growth Rate with the passing of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) (Chee et al.). ACA has in a way pushed the healthcare business industry to be more streamlined and technology focused using proven strategies to run the business side of healthcare and measure quality (CAHPS). The third goal of improving healthcare delivery includes quality, efficiency, and accountability. This is achieved through use of multiple metrics such as patient surveys, readmissions, and quality of life (Lazar et al. 2013). It is through these quality measurements, providers are given incentives for care quality. Prior to passage of the ACA, doctors were paid a fee for the services they provided and no consideration was given to the quality of that service. In essence, a person could go in and receive top-notch service and would pay the same fee to a great physician as they would have paid to a physician who was negligent and careless. Another issue that can affect quality is readmissions for noncompliant patients. Quality scores can also suffer from this (Seaborg).In theory, such a practice is not good business, receiving lackluster work but paying a premium price. After ACA, healthcare providers are now receiving incentives for the quality of their work (How Insurance Changes).
The final way the ACA has impacted healthcare business strategies is through improved technology. This technology is used in every level of healthcare to make improvements to business strategies, operations, and procedures (Nemeth et al.). This part ties in with the training incentives to ensure the workforce and training requirements evolve with the technology (Morrissey). This new technology is used to reduce risk and revenue loss (Wang et. al).
CONCLUSION
The Affordable Care Act turned the healthcare industry on its ear. The legislation ushered in a multitude of changes that have revamped an outdated medical industry. With any new legislation, there will be resistance, but the legislation has built in protections against such resistance in the form of penalties. An already struggling healthcare industry cannot undertake penalties for resistance, although some states have chosen to do this with opting out. As of now, the country can appreciate the improvements in care implementation, quality care and service, reduction in wasteful spending and fraudulent claims, streamlined, efficient service delivery, and a growing and continuously improving workforce equipped with the latest medical information technology. With the incentives given to individuals within the healthcare industry, it is highly likely the field will soon have a growth spurt to supplement its current workforce shortages. The ACA seems to be successful in all of its goals, but only time will reveal the full impact it will have on health care business strategies.
Cite this page
Affordable Care Act and Healthcare Business Strategies. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Cite this page
Affordable Care Act (ACA). (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Rene Descartes and Mathematics
Cite this page
Rene Descartes and mathematics. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Epistemological Questions by Descartes
Cite this page
Epistemological questions by Descartes. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
About Enron Company
Cite this page
About Enron company. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Enron Filed for Bankruptcy
Cite this page
Enron filed for bankruptcy. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Enron’s Accountability
Cite this page
Enron's accountability. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Philosophy of Journalism
Journalism in the modern world is one of the primary practices which is essential for the common knowledge of the people. Journalists all over the world try hard to report and uncover the truth of mysterious cases, be it political, social, economic or environmental. The hardships and difficulties that the journalists face in the process are unimaginable. However, between all these hardships it is essential for the journalists to maintain a code of conduct and abide by the philosophy of journalism in order to do justice to the noble profession that they do. In today's world there is a tendency for the journalists to delve deep into the matter of the fact and develop the stories with details and facts. However, in doing so, the journalists should abide by the moral obligations and uphold their responsibilities towards the society as a priority over the entertainment factor.
The question of obligation of the media personnel are raised in this context. It is very hard to determine that in today's world whether they are obliged to the media houses they work for or to the public. According to Kant's means to an ends' ideology media can be related to ethics, where the great philosopher is of the idea that no person should be used for the purpose of benefits for another person (Côt©, Piff and Willer 2013). In this context it can be related to the ethics of journalism. Today it is a known fact, that many eminent journalists have been reported to use unethical means to fabricate their stories or use unethical ways to make up stories to cater to the entertainment factor of the general reader. This goes against the ethics of journalism. If Kant's philosophy is to be considered, then it can be said that journalists should limit themselves to the reporting of the true facts and leave the choice of decision in the hands of readers (Stein 2016). It is improper according to Kant's theory for a journalist to take advantage of the situation and fabricate the news accordingly to influence the readers. The breach in the ethics is against the philosophy of journalism. Secondly, comes the truth telling part of journalism.
The true purpose of journalism is to report the truth to the general public (Allen and Hindman 2014). However, if looked upon ethically, truth-telling can be done in a number of ways. Now in the notion of journalism, it is to be stated that a journalist should report the entire truth in an unbiased manner without hiding any facts. According to Kant's philosophy, truth is a universal law, which is imperative for the knowledge of all. The philosophy of journalism is also true for all (Marcuse 2013). It can be seen that journalism can be defined by different ethics but from the above discussion it can be concluded that the two most important ethics are to present an unbiased report and also to present the entire truth and leave the decision making to the readers. References: Allen, D.S. and Hindman, E.B., 2014. The media and democracy: Using democratic theory in journalism ethics. The ethics of journalism: Individual, institutional, and cultural influences, pp.185-203. C??t©, S., Piff, P.K. and Willer, R., 2013. For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(3), p.490. Marcuse, H., 2013. Reason and revolution. Routledge. Stein, A., 2016. Journalism and Ethics. In Real-World Media Ethics (pp. 169-183). Focal Press.
Cite this page
Philosophy Of Journalism. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
A Journalism and a Government
Cite this page
A journalism and a government. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
About Development Journalism
Cite this page
About development journalism. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
History of Jazz
The room is quiet as the players get on stage. The company is filled with a pianist, horn, drums, upright bass, and saxophone. They start to play, the horn taking the head improvising as the rest of the company played supporting the horn. It then the sax takes over the solo as the rest of players backed them up. This repeats throughout the piece, the musicians putting a little bit of themselves into the solos.
This is jazz, the style of music where players weave melodies and harmonies. A style where improvising is king and has given birth to man stiles during his reign. This paper will dive into the history of jazz starting with its birth to now, and how it affected the players and events around it.
New Orleans the home to Mardi Gras is the birthplace of jazz. Jazz was created when immigrants from all nations and all stations came to together to form a new sound, an example of this is in the book The History of Jazz by Ted Gioia, The dances in Congo Square were a nexus where opposites collided. So much like the city that gave birth to it, jazz was a mixture of all different cultures that came together to make a new sound.
One of the first to make this new sound was Buddy Bolden, who has been thought of as the father of jazz. (Gioia, 2011)His new creation was described as, that he was loud, and second, that his music opened the door to improvisation. "His combination of charisma and playing style is what put it over," he said. (Cieply, 2007) So like the birthplace of jazz, the creator of jazz mixed his own playing and aptitude to make this new style great.
Jazz at first was dived into two styles, New Orleans Jazz and Dixie land which had their share of bands one of which was the King Oliver's Creole Jazz Band. The band would play in the style of Dixie land which meant that the pieces would focus more on ensemble work then the soloists in their pieces. Also, Dixie jazz would have a raw sound to it and a linear style according to the History of Jazz.
Yet like fall when the leaves change so did the jazz when Lewis Armstrong's Hot Fives and Sevens records came out. Instead of a tight-knit artist who played together in a big band, Armstrong called forth artists who were not in a big band and worked together with them to make a new sound for jazz. This sound was different, gone was the idea of playing together as an ensemble as in Dixieland or New Orleans jazz, no now there was a solo line which went over the rest of band and stuck out with its own rhythm and notes. (Gioia, 2011)
In the vein of Armstrong Duke Ellington's band was created not by people who played together for years, but those who were special in their playing. (Gioia, 2011) In some cases, he considered how an artist would play into writing music his band, an alto solo was not just for any alto, but for the particularly breathless play of Johnny Hodges. (Epstein, 1999). This gives his music a different sound than other jazz bands because of the uniqueness of the sound. In some cases, he was ahead of his time, using people's different strengths to make something good, almost like some of the songs that are broadcast over the radio today.
Also, during Ellington's day there was a King of Swing, and his name was Benny Goodman. Goodman rose to power because of his personality and his great ability to play music. Yet his rise of fame came to a head during 1935 where, Goodman's eventual triumph??” signaled by his breakthrough performance at the Palomar Ballroom in Los Angeles. (Gioia, 2011) During this performance, Goodman had given birth to the swing era, an era with very good music to dance too.
After Swing, a new underground movement was taken place. A style that focused on the lower part in the pieces and complex melodies. This style was called bebop and longer solos and faster tempos that its brother swing had. It was so out there during its time that those who played it were called rebels. (Gioia, 2011)
Charlie Parker was one of these rebels who had a comeback story to start off his carrier. The first jam session he played at went very badly and he was laughed out of the rehearsal room. He did come back years later and got a job with Buster Smith's band as a 2nd alto according to book The History of Jazz. Though after a stent of being in New York he could not function, so he had to move back to his home to help create bebop. (Gioia, 2011)
It was not just the composition and solos in bebop that was different, it was the piano playing too. The piano style was created in the mid-1940s and focused more on a pure tone type sound, instead of the muddled tones of Tatum and Elton used during their hay day. During this time the right hand was the star over the left and was given chromic overtones and rhythmic fumes while the left just played a simple chord or melody underneath it, which caused bebop to have the kick it needs to have the right sound. (Gioia, 2011)
One of the artists who took the bebop piano was Bud Powell, who was described as the soul of bebop movement. His playing reconstructed the way that jazz players would play the piano forever. His influence may have been a whisper, but it still holds today. Yet like many players before him, he got into the drug crazy and his playing became muddy and filled with chaos which was not present in his first works. (Gioia, 2011)
Thelonious Monk was another bebopper whose carrier was the opposite of Powell. Monk started out in the 1940s and '50s as a forgotten player but found his footing in the 1950s when he became the voice of bebop. (Gioia, 2011) In an article by Sean Spence described the pianist playing as, instantly recognizable, sounding as if the modernist Schoenberg had inherited the jazz tradition of Fats Waller: angular music, jangling with discordant note clusters, set over jerking rhythms which nevertheless seem to "swing. (Spence, 1998) In other words, Thelonious Monk's playing was a great example of how bebop music was to be played. Bebop was a class of music that should be played with personality.
"Take Five, a record by Paul Desmond was created during this time. It was different from many songs that came before it because it was created with unusual time signatures and blended jazz with classical music. The piece also had thick harmonies and thanks to Desmond's playing had smooth jazz tones playing over it. Dave Brubeck, on the other hand, had more of a playful tone to his playing and loved experimenting with new sounds. (Gioia, 2011) Both Brubeck and Desmond were working hard to expand the style of jazz from what it was known for.
In this idea of expanding what jazz was known for might have led to the idea of Fragmentation. Fragmentation means separating into different groups, for jazz that meant dividing up into hard bop, West Coast Jazz, Soul Jazz, Modern Jazz, third stream jazz and Free jazz. This idea was brought to the front with the album: Birth of Cool, which explored the style of cool Jazz. This idea of cool jazz was almost like bebop in its rise starting off as an underground movement in jazz but speared headed by the younger generation with artists like Miles Davis, along with many others like Gerry Mulligan, Stan Getz, Paul Desmond and Art Pepper (Gioia, 2011).
During the time when Cool Jazz came out another jazz which combined the Latin beats of samba with cool smooth notes of jazz came into being. (Gioia, 2011)This craze was called bossa nova and it can be described as, It comes from a kind of silence. ... It comes from beautiful silence and beautiful meditation. You listen, and you feel like you are watching the sea," adds Donato... (Reich, 2008) This description is accurate because Bossa Nova had a subdued tone with challenging harmonies and fine solos according to the article by Berry Kernfeld. (Kernfeld, 2008). It was this sound that caused both Charlie Byrd and with Stan Getz to bring the sound over to the United States.
During this time both Miles Davis and John Coltrane were at the height of their popularity in the different playing styles. Coltrane's style was more improvisation, an example of this would be his recording, Kind of Blue. The recording used scales instead of cords and this gave more freedom to the soloists who had to play difficult solos, according to The History of Jazz. Davis on the other hand when compared to Coltrane played his trumpet with focus and usually went up and down scales like the video, "So What" where both Coltrane and Davis played together. (Davis, 1959)
Speaking of Miles Davis playing, one of his sidemen helped pave the way for both Hard bop and soul jazz and his name was Art Blacky. Blacky started as a piano player but moved into drums when the band he was playing in got a new piano player. His drum playing spurred new sounds for the jazz crazy according to The History of Jazz. Blacky was not the only person who worked to change jazz another was Charles Mingus.
Charles Mingus was a traditional jazz player who would tinker with the legacies of the past and was partly progressive without the freedom principal that had been going on through jazz. According to The History of Jazz Mingus playing was a style without a style. This was because his melody was bent out of shape and his counterpoint was a sassy sound that was different from the pieces during that time.
The change in style was not just in the horns or piano but in guitars as well. From Kenny Burrell and Grant Green who changed how guitar playing was viewed to West Montgomery who combined commercial and street jazz. Montgomery also created new ways of playing the guitar according to The History of Jazz by playing the said instrument with his thumb.
Society along with artist changed Jazz, and a prime example of this is Free Jazz it. In the 1960s the Civil Rights Movement was on the rise, and music like in other times started to reflect it. That is what caused the birth of Free Jazz, the example of music that reflected what was happening in society. (Gioia, 2011) The music also was getting away from harmony and the construction of music that was going on that time. Almost like those who marched for equal rights during the same time going against what society thought was right during that time. One of the ones who did this type of construction was Ornette Coleman, an artist whose sound was described as a hocking shouting ruffing sound which stayed on one note or came out as a guttural howl (Gioia, 2011) This sound seemed to be a good simile for what was happening around during that time, because many had raised their voices to be heard, almost like they were howling.
After free jazz there came Fusion, the exact opposite of Fragmentation. In the case of fusion was when jazz was combined with other styles of music. One of the first recordings that explored fusion was Bitches Brew by Miles Davis. According to The History of Jazz, the recording was a mix of raw and unfiltered music, rattling discursive, and often unfiltered music. This along with this sound the tracks were over 10 minutes which caused sales to drop for the record.
Other artists who worked with fusion according to The History of Jazz were: Herbie Hancock who along with his headhunters combined disco with jazz, while Tony Williams combined rock- in- roll with jazz. Mahavishnu orchestra directed by John Mclaughnm which combined jazz with Indian music. Another group was the weathermen created by Wayne Shorter and Joe Zawinul used piano and used electric keyboards to created layers in their music and used a compositional -ordinated style (Gioia, 2011)
One thing that stayed constant with most jazz styles was the singer. One of the most famous singers was Billie Holiday whose voice according to The History of Jazz had a very small range, and half octaves and her voice did not project well. What made her great though was her timing and how her voice could connect with the music to make it her own. This changed however when she got addicted to drugs and her voice seemed to become dark and scared and it caused her voice to sound rough and become more somber. (Gioia, 2011)
Ella Fitzgerald was another jazz singer that was popular both now and during her time. Her voice in the example of Summer Time was a mixture of hums and low tones which make the song flow, also the raspy sound in her voice gives the song more meaning. (Du Bose Heyward, 1968). It is one of the few voices that could tell a story that people would want to hear.
Jazz like other music had its own battle between the new and old ways of thinking. This was described as Postmodern vs. Traditional practices. Postmodern artists focused more sound and mixing jazz with other styles according to the History of jazz. Some groups that practiced Postmodern styles were: AACM, Steve Coey, Threadgill, and Guerilla Jazz where old approaches were used to make new music. There was also an artist named Braxton who went farther than the other artist by taking music from both African and European music. (Gioia, 2011)
Wynton Marsalis was another postmodern jazz artist. According to The History of Jazz Wynton rise into fame started when he was a teenager and played with the Haydn Trumpet Concerto with the New Orleans Philharmonic band. (Gioia, 2011) Using this stepping stone, he became a Grammy award-winning artist in both Classic and Jazz styles. He also tried to combine both postmodern and the roots of jazz together. Marsalis even became the artistic director of the Lincoln Center and was named as a jazz ambassador.
Jazz is popular even now even though it has changed a bit, both the United States and Europe still have a heart for it though. Jazz now is sometimes making recordings using software instead of living players to perform, which can be equal to the greats that had come before, according to the History of Jazz. Also, since the rise of technology induvial artist can record records and share them online without the aid of a label. (Gioia, 2011) This means more money for those artists who want to branch out and do their own thing to change jazz. Even though it has gone more into a technology era, jazz is still affected by what happens in society. A recent example of this would be the dark and somber sounds in jazz after the events of 9/11. (Gioia, 2011)
Jazz also has switch popularity in recent years. The History of Jazz comments that once jazz was favored more in America than Europe during the start of jazz. This has changed now jazz is the main form in Europe bosting more fame than it is America now. In the old days those who played jazz in Europe would go over to America to get more pay and recognition, now it is the opposite. (Gioia, 2011) In other words, if a jazz artist wants to make it big, they need to go to the festivals in Europe that celebrate the jazz is the right way to go. It would be either that or go into a time machine back to when Jazz first became popular in the United States.
Jazz, a style of music that changed throughout the years but still has the same heart. It has gone through many styles and has given birth to many great artists in its run. Jazz was created from a mixture of history and styles and moved throughout the world changing with time and what the artist wanted to change it to. Jazz is a wonderful sound, and those who hear will also hear the history that comes with it, which is what music is here for.
Bibliography
- Cieply, M. (2007). The elusive man who may have invented jazz. International Herald Tribune, 11. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/318821 561?accountid=11648
- Davis, M. (1959). So what. New York, New york, USA . Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diHFEapOr_E
- Du Bose Heyward, G. G. (1968). Summer Time [Recorded by E. Fitzgerald].
- Epstein, J. (1999, June 4). Ellington's century and a century of Duke. Philadelphia Tribune, 16E. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/337739
- Gioia, T. (2011). History of Jazz (Vol. 2nd edition ). New York, New York : Oxford University Press.
- Kernfeld, B. (2008). Bozza Nova (Jazz). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com.proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-2000990003#omo-9781561592630-e-2000990003-bibliography-1
- Reich, H. (2008). 50 years under the spell of bossa nova. Chicago Tribune, 7.1. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/420685
- Spence, S. A. ( 1998). Thelonious Monk: His Life and Music; Straight,No Chaser. The Life and Genius of Thelonious Monk. British Medical Journal, Vol. 317( 7166), 1162. Retrieved from https://proxyeast.uits.iu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/177758
Cite this page
History of Jazz. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
The History and Makings of Jazz
Cite this page
The History and Makings of Jazz. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Jazz Concert Report
Cite this page
Jazz concert report. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
History of Jazz to the MTV Age War Peace
In contrast to the stable and economically affluent time of the 1950s, the 1960s and 1970s exhibited a monumental change in ideas and led to culturally tumultuous events. While this was reflected in many ways, one of the most significant illustrations of these changes is seen in the music of the 1960s and 1970s With the Vietnam war raging, it makes sense that anti-war songs such as “Gimme Shelter” by the Rolling Stones and Arlo Guthrie’s 18 minute classic “Alice’s Restaurant” were popular hits. The music was also reflected in the counter culture that almost synonymously went with the music. All the violence, hate, and death that people saw and experienced in Vietnam led to a rich counter culture of peace, love, and drugs and this is expressed heavily in songs such as Jimi Hendrix’s drug fueled “Purple Haze” and John Lennon’s peace urging “Imagine”. The music also reflected in the civil rights movement, the new divorce laws, and the changing culture of the time.
The average age of an American in 1950 was 35. In contrast, in 1960, the average age of an American was 17. This significant age gap between the older authority and younger, rebellious teens led to a difference in ideology and the start of protests on college campuses. Early protests started over the strict behavioral codes put in place by college administrations, made in attempts to try to stop the promiscuous behavior that clashed with the suburban lifestyle of the 50’s. Having tasted victory when they succeeded in removing the strict regulations set upon them by their university administrations, students moved on to see what other social issues they could change by protesting. It was not very long before students were protesting segregation, the draft, nuclear weapons, and anything and everything in-between.
By the time the 1960s began, the Civil Rights movement was fully underway with “Brown vs Board of Education”, occurring in 1954, and the Civil Rights Act of 1957 being passed at the end of the 1950s. The 1960s started with The Freedom Rides, which took place in 1961, and Martin Luther King Jr’s March on Washington in 1963. Bob Dylan discusses the change in ideology and the growing force of the Civil Rights movement with his 1963 song “The Times They Are A-Changin”. In this song Dylan, says that, “the times they are a-changin'/Come senators, congressmen, Please heed the call/ Don't stand in the doorway, Don't block up the hall/ For he that gets hurt, Will be he who has stalled/There's a battle outside, And it is ragin'/ It'll soon shake your windows, And rattle your walls/For the times they are a-changin'”. By using imagery of a house shaking he shows, metaphorically, that the Civil Rights movement was strong enough to shake a house, and he says that those who stand in the way will only be knocked down. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed soon after ,not only granting more rights to African Americans but to woman as well. Although Southerners originally wrote women’s rights into the Civil Rights Act as an excuse to not vote for the bill (on the pretense of gender rather than race), their plan backfired, causing more people to support (and then vote for) the bill.
The 60s also led to the addition of “No Fault” divorce. Prior to the 1960s in order for a couple to get divorced one of the couple would need to shown to be ‘at fault’ in court. “Faults” by which a marriage could end included alcoholism and adultery. Tammy Wynette sings of the pain she feels from the end of her marriage in her song “D-I-V-O-R-C-E”. Tammy sings “Our D-I-V-O-R-C-E; becomes final today/Me and little J-O-E will be goin' away/I love you both and this will be pure H-E double L for me/Oh, I wish that we could stop this D-I-V-O-R-C-E.”
The counter culture of the 1960s was as pure anti-establishment as could be. Counter Culturists preached peace and love to combat the violence and fear that came from the Vietnam War, and drug culture was a significant part of this. People felt so strongly about the positive effects of drugs that they believed that if everyone smoked marijuana or tried LSD, it would change peoples views enough that they would experience an internal change and no longer be violent. Famous for his incredible guitar playing and use of LSD, Jimi Hendrix sings of his drug fueled visions in his song “Purple Haze”. Hendrix describes the drugs as more confusing than enlightening and it seems almost like he’s crying out when he sings “Purple Haze all in my brain/lately things don't seem the same/actin' funny but I don't know why/'scuse me while I kiss the sky/ Purple Haze all around,/don't know if I'm coming up or down/Am I happy or in misery?/Whatever it is, that girl put a spell on me,”. While Jimi Hendrix’s Purple Haze talks of his experience with drugs, John Lennon’s 1971 song, “Imagine” illustrates the ideals that many of the counter culturists lived by. John Lennon preaches peace by asking listeners to imagine a different world. He sings “Imagine there's no countries, It isn't hard to do/Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion too/Imagine all the people living life in peace, you/You may say I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one/I hope some day you'll join us, And the world will be as one/ Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can/No need for greed or hunger, A brotherhood of man/Imagine all the people sharing all the world, you,/You may say I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one/I hope some day you'll join us/And the world will be as one”. The beliefs Imagine contains are at the core of the activism/counterculture movement with people believing that drugs helped perpetuate and assist people in imagining and realizing this potential perfect world.
While drug culture started fairly harmlessly, with most musicians within the culture simply smoking weed and dropping acid, towards the end of the 1960s ,there was an immergence of a harder drug, heroin, which led to a struggle of addiction and oftentimes death within the music circles. Written in 1967, The Velvet Underground write of their struggles with the never ending craving for the drug. They sing “Heroin, be the death of me/Heroin, it's my wife and it's my life, haha/Because a mainline into my vein/Leads to a center in my head/And then I'm better off than dead, Because when the smack begins to flow/I really don't care anymore/About all the Jim-Jims in this town/And all the politicians making crazy sounds/ And everybody putting everybody else down/And all the dead bodies piled up in mounds/Cause when the smack begins to flow/And I really don't care anymore.”. The Velvet Underground show how they lose themselves in the drug and how they just don’t seem to care anymore about things they once cared about. The line “And all the dead bodies piled up in mounds/ Cause when the smack begins to flow/And I really don't care anymore” is particularly haunting as it could either refer to the ever-rising body count of American troops in Vietnam, or to the other counter culturists who were also suffering and dying from using heroin.
The anti-war movement can be seen within the popular protest song of the time “Gimme Shelter” by the Rolling Stones. Mick Jaeger warns of how close the war is by singing “Oh, a storm is threat'ning, My very life today/If I don't get some shelter, Oh yeah, I'm gonna fade away/War, children, it's just a shot away, It's just a shot away/War, children, it's just a shot away, It's just a shot away/Ooh, see the fire is sweepin', Our very, street today/Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bull lost your way”. The storm he refers to that is threatening his way of life is the Vietnam war which is “only a shot away”. At the time of it’s release in 1969, the U.S. had already lost a significant amount of pro-war support due to the United States’ defeat in the Tet Offensive occurring in 1968 and it was around this time that the very unpopular military draft became instated. With the excess fear and televised loss of life that came with the war few people wanted to go to Vietnam and even fewer wanted to be drafted. People talked about different ways they could to trick the proctors of the military screening into thinking that they were unfit for combat and Arlo Guthrie’s 18 minute masterpiece “Alice’s Restaurant” is about his draft avoidance and how he got out of going to Vietnam. Arlo’s style of singing is part spoken story telling with sung hooks here and there. Arlo tell’s of the draft in New York singing “I'm here to talk about the draft, They got a buildin' down in New York City called Whitehall Street, where you , Walk in, you get injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected and selected!, I went down and got my physical examination one day, and I walked in, sat Down (got good and drunk the night before, so I looked and felt my best when I went in that morning, 'cause I wanted to look like the All-American Kid From New York City. I wanted to feel like I wanted to be the All-american Kid from New York), and I walked in, sat down, I was hung down Brung down, hung up and all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly things
And I walked in, I sat down, they gave me a piece of paper that said "Kid See the psychiatrist in room 604"
I went up there, I said, "Shrink, I want to kill. I want to kill! I want to see Blood and gore and guts and veins in my teeth! Eat dead, burnt bodies! I Mean Kill. Kill!"
And I started jumpin' up and down, yellin' "KILL! Kill!" and he started Jumpin' up and down with me, and we was both jumpin' up and down, yellin' "Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill!" and the sergeant came over, pinned a medal on me Sent me down the hall, said "You're our boy". Didn't feel too good about it
Proceeded down the hall, gettin' more injections, inspections, detections Neglections, and all kinds of stuff that they was doin' to me at the thing There, and I was there for two hours three hours four hours I was There for a long time goin' through all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly thingsAnd I was just havin' a tough time there, and they was inspectin', Injectin', every single part of me, and they was leavin' no part untouched!
Proceeded through, and I finally came to see the very last man. I walked in, Sat down, after a whole big thing there. I walked up, and I said, "what do You want?" He said, "kid, we only got one question, have you ever been Arrested?". At this point in the story Arlo recalls the time he was arrested for littering and recounts the entire story again before they tell him that he can’t be in the military if he’s been convicted of a crime. This song is comical and light but truly shows a lot of the fear that people were feeling at the time. The Vietnam was loosing more and more support and with draft, a lot people who didn’t want to a part of it had to become a part of it or face incarceration for evading the draft.
As the U.S. rolls into the 1970s Richard Nixon uses the anti-government mindset from the 1960s to push the idea of privatization in the 1970s. Privatization is the idea that the private sector can do everything better than the government can and this led to massive amounts of deregulation across multiple industries. This led to the popularization of commercial flight as well as creating better gym’s and healthcare in the country.
Although the 1960s and 1970s were a turbulent time in American the backlash to the authorities led to a rich culture of music. This music reflects the feelings of the times in relation to the war, the Civil Rights movement, the drug fueled counter culture, and everything in between, conveying both fear, as well as the love and the changes that were occurring.
Works Cited
- Anderson, Terry H. The Sixties . 4th ed., Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
Cite this page
History of Jazz to the MTV Age War Peace. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Music Autobiography
Cite this page
Music Autobiography. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Americans Wanted Muslims
At the mention of September 11, 2001, most people's minds instantly flash back to the visual of planes flying, buildings smoking, immense pain, and the hateful acts of United States enemies. This date in history has been defined as the occurrence of an act of terrorism that was carried out by members of the Islamic faith. Terrorism has become associated with the ideas of brutality, hate, and tyrannical killing of innocent souls; the stereotype is that Islam encourages and supports these acts, and it has led to Western dissent towards the religion. A Pew poll from September 2007 showed that 35% of Americans possessed an unfavorable perception of Muslims, and an August 2007 Financial Times/Harris Poll found that 21% of Americans consider the presence of Muslims in this country as a national security threat.
Furthermore, a 2006 USA Today/Gallup poll revealed that 39% of Americans wanted Muslims to hold special identification cards and found that almost half of Americans feel that Muslims are extremists. Nearly one-fourth of those polled expressed not wanting a Muslim as a neighbor. Less than half think that Muslims would stand the test of loyalty to the United States. These numbers have only risen, as a 2009 Washington Post/ABC poll found that 48% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of Islam ad nearly 30% thought that Islam encourages violence. This number has since doubled in light of recent developments in terrorism.
As Colin Chapman points out in his book Islamic Terrorism' Is there a Christian Response, we must question if this perception represents the truth and ask: do we understand in its entirety how terrorism relates to Islam? Many scholars have written on this issue, discussing how the common perspective of terrorism characterizes Islam as violent and clouds it's identity as a peaceful religion.
In his book Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea, Shiraz Maher argues that there is an urgent need to better understand the beliefs that underlie Islamic terrorism, especially with the modern-day relevance to the struggle for power and propagation of religion in the Middle East. These Islamist acts of terror can be traced to the roots of Salafi-Jihadism. Some people view all Muslims as under the umbrella of violent Islamists based on examples seen in the media of individuals like Osama bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, and the radical Islamic State (ISIS). On the other hand, some individuals such as George W. Bush viewed Islam as a religion of peace.
The essay has a two-fold agenda. First, I argue that there is strong evidence that Islamist Terrorism is rooted in Qur'anic text and Jihadist religious belief. The work of Shiraz Maher has defined and addressed Salafi-Jihadism in the context of terrorist ideology, and other Islamic scholars have also introduced and dissected the different beliefs and practices of violent and nonviolent Islamic groups. Second, I argue that Islam is not a religion of sole violence or sole peace, and that the reality lies somewhere in the middle.
Violent extremists and pacifists in the faith draw their ideologies from similar religious texts and ideologies, however it is their interpretation of these texts that leads to the variation in belief and practice among members of the faith.
Cite this page
Americans Wanted Muslims. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Definitions of Terrorism Utilized
For centuries, fear has been used as a tactic to gain political power, oppress religious groups, and, in some cases, fight social injustice. The early first century Sicarii employed fear and murder in order to overthrow the Roman rule and gain religious freedom. In 1605, Guy Fawkes attempted to terrorize the House of Lords in England so that Roman Catholic persecution would end (Roser 1). While mass terror has been viewed as a low priority issue in the past, the alarming increase in terrorism over the past three decades has seized the attention of the world.
These recent events have raised many public questions: What motivates terrorists to commit such egregious acts; and how can humanity combat an undefined enemy, and a suicidal one at that? Terrorism can be considered effective in the sense that its reverberations echo in the lives of the affected for as long as they live; despite this fact, the issue of moral justification arises. Some minority groups claim that there are certain circumstances in which terrorism is justifiable while many victims of grotesque acts of terror adamantly advocate the opposite; those who commit acts of terror are indeed monsters regardless of religious conviction or political motivation. How, exactly, is a terrorist defined? Due to the complexity of gathering data on terrorists and the perception of positive and negative sides of acts of terrorism, there is no universally agreed upon definition of terrorism.
In fact, there are at least 22 legal definitions of terrorism utilized by the United States Government (Beck 1). A loose definition of a terrorist according to Colin J. Beck, a research student at Pomona College, is any individuals who target citizens and threaten national security (Beck 2). Another definition, used by the United States Government to determine terrorist organizations, limits terrorism to politically motivated violence against noncombatant targets (Beck 3). The inconsistencies in the definitions are important because they determine what groups of people are constantly watched by international governments and those who are simply ignored. The fact that there is no international definition of terrorism strengthens the terrorist's movement because there can be no unified effort against those who would be internationally designated terrorists.
In order to effectively analyze present-day terrorism, it is necessary to understand the origins of the issue and the motives of the perpetrator. One of the first know acts of terror was set off by religious tensions in first century Rome. Nestled in the pressure cooker of the Middle East, an elitist Jewish sect of Zealots known as the Sicarii opposed Roman rule and sought to instill terror in the hearts of law-abiding citizens. The Sicarii stabbed their victims with concealed daggers, thereby creating an uproar in a public area. After the killing, murderers would join in the cries of indignation in order to decrease suspicion and possibility of discovery (Roser 1). These undertakings, motivated by hatred for the anti-Jewish authorities, are comparable to present day terrorism in the Middle East. Another instance of past terrorism is the plot to destroy the House of Lords in England. A secret group of individuals conspired to upseat the ruling party in England in order to reinstate a Catholic Monarch (Roser 1).
The plot, initiated by Robert Catesby, consisted of stockpiling numerous cases of gunpowder in a lower section of the English parliamentary house and igniting the cases when many lords and rulers were present in the chambers above. These religious motives justified the potentially devastating act in the eyes of the criminals, but upon further observation, this logic compromises the original intent. The terrorists in both situations sought to overthrow the powers over them in exchange for their own ideas of ruling in order to benefit the people they represent. These instances of early resistance and terror have defined pre-twentieth century terrorism (Roser 1). There is one event that has greatly altered United States national security in the past twenty years. Arguably the most infamous terrorist attack in recent history is the strike on the World Trade Center towers in New York City, New York on September 11, 2001. Most Americans know the details of this event but few know the stories of two masterminds who planned the operation: Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Osama Bin Laden. One man was consumed with his religion while the other was consumed with achieving political goals.
At one point in Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's life, he was a regular boy growing up in the middle east; however, when he was a teenager, he succumbed to the greatly politicized Muslim Brotherhood. Mohammed became obsessed with the concept of war on religions that oppose Islam at an early age and began to adopt severely anti-American values (Marks 5). Mohammed moved to the United States to pursue an Engineering degree; however, this was clearly not his ultimate goal. He fit the profile of a natural immigrant. Mohammed believed that the United States was weaker than many people suspected so he formed a plot to hijack planes and fly them into significant buildings. According to an interview with Osama Bin Laden, Mohammed was said to have liked the action when planning catastrophic events (Marks 6). He certainly thrived on September 11, 2001.
Osama Bin Laden was quite the opposite of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Laden was a devout follower of Islam, praying seven times a day and fasting twice a week at the age of 13 (Marks 6). In contrast with Mohammed's political motivations, Laden was largely motivated by a religious ideology. His steadfast belief in Islam drove him to lead an attack on one of his primary enemies: the United States (Bergen 2). The partnership between the two men culminated in one of the most devastating acts of terror in recent history. The process Mohammed and Laden went through as younger boys is now known as radicalization and can be defined by favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions (radical def. 3.1.b).
Radicalization is a tactic employed by many terrorist organizations to gain new recruits and can also explain some of the motivations of present-day terrorists. Contrary to popular belief, terrorists are predominantly motivated by political goals rather than religious agendas or otherwise (Roser 1). A psychologist from Pennsylvania State University found common strands between persons who are susceptible to radicalization and terrorist recruitment. Two frequent characteristics are those of perceived disenfranchizement and victimization (DeAngelis 1).
Cite this page
Definitions Of Terrorism Utilized. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Most of History Humans
Throughout most of history humans have been controlled by absolute monarchies or regimes run by a single family. As well as given very few liberties and the ability to freely live their lives. It wasn't until around the 1500's that certain individuals began to freely think for themselves without the influence of their government and oppressors. Around 1775 the world began to see a major change in the way people think and go about defying their current system of government in the American revolution. But the American revolution didn't start on its own with the masses, it was inspired by certain individuals who had the courage to stand up to their current government and inform the masses of their wrong doings. Writers like Tomas Pain with his Common Sense and free thinkers like John Locke and Benjamin Franklin all gave inspiration to the American Revolution. The United States would not be what it is today without their efforts.
One of the most important documents in American history would be the pamphlet Common Sense written by Tomas Pain. In this document Pain rallies the colonists to support the separation from Great Britain's rule. In the pamphlet he states, I am not induced by motives of pride, party, or resentment to espouse the doctrine of separation and independence; I am clearly, positively, and conscientiously persuaded that it is the true interest of this continent to be so. (Common Sense). While supporting American independence he denounces the British monarchy and says that people are born in a state of equality. Paine also said that there are no natural rulers among men. And that everyone is born equally.
Common Sense gained so much traction in the American revolution that even George Washington read it to his men as inspiration before they went into battle. Not only did he rally the support of the colonists, but he also gave the united states an idea for a representative government to be used in order to replace the old regime. A few months after Common Sense was published the colonies passed the declaration of independence. Without Thomas pain and his ability to rally the colonists, the united states would not be the same country that it is today.
Another influential figure in the American revolution was Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin was a crucial figure in the American revolution because he was able to procure funds for the colonists to fight the British. In 1778, Benjamin Franklin and 2 different Americans became American diplomats in France. Benjamin Franklin met with several French diplomats, policy makers and even King Louis XVI who were all impressed with his thoughts, talents and writings. Because of Benjamin Franklin's extreme influence in France throughout his 10 years there, the country that said they were officially neutral took great measures to help the United States during the Revolutionary War.
During the Revolutionary War, France agreed to lend the United States millions of dollars in aid, which allowed the U.S.warships in its harbors to fight and even let volunteers enlist to fight against British. Franklin was one among 5 members of the Continental Congress to be placed responsible of negotiating an accord between the U.S.and Great Britain. The 1783 accord of Paris was the results of their negotiations. Then in October of 1729, Benjamin Franklin bought the newspaper The Pennsylvania Gazette. With this he was able to push out propaganda for the American revolution. One of his most famous propaganda pieces was the join or die snake in 1754. This political cartoon become a symbol of unity between all the colonies. Benjamin Franklin's ability to unify the colonies and gain financial support from France to the colonies played a crucial part in the success of the revolution.
The last great enlightenment thinker that influenced the American revolution was John Locke. One of Kohn Locke's most important works was the Two treaties of government. According to history.wisc.edu the treaties of government was published in 1689 and attacked the tory beliefs that have been formed in the early seventeenth century. Within the two treaties of government John Locke states that the power of the king or government comes from the people who obey their rules in order to obtain law and security.
The second thing he states is that everyone has a natural right to hold property, which can never be taken without their consent. The last thing he states is that if a ruler decides to infringe on the terms of the contract that empowers or seize property, the people can overthrow and disobey him. Some other ideas that he had were that all men were created equal and was subject to no one but god. Locke also argues that it would be wise of the government to delegate their power to different bodies so that no branch of government would be too powerful. This idea can be seen today with the American government. After the revolution the founding fathers needed to create a government that was able to uphold the rights of the citizens but at the same time not be too powerful. So, what they did was they looked to john Locke's works and idea and used them to established the three branches of government.
The enlightenment era was a very important influencer in the American revolution. The people who had the courage and determination to go against their government and even their way of living, have done a great service to this world. People like Thomas Pain who created common sense and gave inspiration to the men and woman who fought in the revolution, or Benjamin Franklin who was able to turn a neutral country into a great supporter for the Americans. Even John Locke, who gave our founding fathers the ideas of a newly well-constructed government and natural rights, all deserve recognition and praise for their outstanding achievements that helps shaped the country that we know today.
Cite this page
Most Of History Humans. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Rococo Art Movement
Originating in France, the Rococo art movement was incorporated into Italy around the eighteenth century (Columbia Encyclopedia, Italian Art The Rococo Period). During this time, Italy experienced corrupt politics by aristocrats taking hegemonic control of politics and economics in order to maintain their position in society (Britannica, Italy - Reform and Enlightenment). Towards the latter portion of the seventeenth century and throughout the nineteenth century, the Enlightenment era was present in Europe (History: Enlightenment). However, Italy's lack of incorporation of technological and philosophical advancements was apparent in Italy until the nineteenth century because of their setback from manipulated politics and economics (Italian Philosophy).
While corrupt politics and limited opportunities for economic growth were the primary causes for Italy's late implementation of enlightened ideas, many pieces of Italian Rococo art send the message that Italians long for improvement in political, social, and cultural conditions by adopting the ideas of the Enlightenment.
Around 1707, the Italian Rococo artist, Alessandro Magnasco, painted The Tame Magpie, which depicts a magpie being taught to sing by an Italian on a part (see Fig.1). Magnasco's painting is not sublime because the tone of the painting is not serious nor depicts an image of greatness beyond calculation (Tate.org, Sublime). However, the underlying message that Magnasco conveys in this painting is one that containsawe and vastness (Oxford Dictionary of Art and Artists). In The Tame Magpie, the suffering Italians, a worn out column, and a broken arch with an abundance of greenery represents the ruin of Italy, which has the potential and desire to grow out of ruination through the implementation of enlightened ideas that are symbolized by the arrival of the intelligent magpie and the distant sailor.
While Magnasco's painting incorporates faint shades of blue, tan, brown, and green, the brightest component of the painting is the light behind the small dark colored magpie, which highlights the intelligent magpie as a symbol of enlightenment that will help Italy in times of despair. The light directly behind the singing magpie sitting above the brown barrels is of a white coloration that combines featherlike specs of gold. The darkly feathered magpie boldly stands out because it is contrasted by the light behind it. This light derives from the opposite end of the body of water behind the port, alluding that the magpie flew from a distant land. In fact, a magpie is considered by some researchers to be among the most intelligent of all animals, and do not originate from Italy, meaning that the magpie present in the painting flew into Italy from an enlightened land (Earthfire Institute, The Intelligence of Crows and Magpies).
Thus, the land the magpie came from directly links to its intelligence, which is validated by the Metropolitan Museum of Art's description of the painting, people from the fringes of society have gathered to watch the spectacle of a man trying to teach a magpie to sing??”an impossible task. However, unlike many other birds in nature, magpies can be taught how to sing, proving that they are extremely intelligent animals that represent a figure mighty enough to conquer the impossible (Youtube, Magpie Singing). Magnasco's purpose of accentuating the magpie through the usage of light contributes to the broader significance of this intelligence; the magpie is a symbol of hope for an enlightened European empire that will enter and transform Italy to become an innovative country.
While Magnasco promotes the Enlightenment through the magpie, he paints the sun rising over the horizon to display Italy's desire to escape a society that lacks progress for its citizens. To the left of the barrels that maintain the magpie, an arch is made of stone. Visible through the arch is a body of water that reveals the painting is set in a port in Italy. The contrast in color between the brownstone arch with the blue sky and darker blue water allows Magnasco to draw the attention of viewers to see what is between the arch and the port. Evident in the space between the arch is a blue silhouette of a sailor and the sun attempting to shine over the horizon.
Even though the sun is not fully above the horizon, the light that is visible from the horizon line is as far behind the port as is the light behind the magpie. Thus, the magpie's symbol of bringing progress to Italy from an enlightened country connects to the light that peeks over the horizon. The sun's yearning to emit all of its light above the horizon corresponds to Italy's yearning for adopting enlightened ideas into its society but surely, the sun will be able to fully rise over the horizon, meaning that one day Italy will adopt the innovations of the Enlightenment era.
The way in which these advanced ideas will be implemented into Italy in this painting is through the blue sailor that is highlighted by the light over the horizon. On the other side of the barrels, worn-out Italians are juxtaposed by a blue sailor, signifying Italy is facing a time of ruin and will be helped by enlightenment. Four Italians lift their hands towards the singing magpie sitting above the barrels, whereas more Italians are scattered along the port. Each individual's face is discolored, containing dark shadows as well as various shades of brown that contrast their usual tan skin. The shadows and discoloration portray the Italians as dirty individuals, alluding to the notion that they are suffering and live in poverty due to the disconnect with enlightenment that delays progression for the country. Also, the clothing worn by the individuals is torn and worn out; looking at the woman feeding her children, her yellow dress is torn at the shoulders while the man in front of her is wearing oversized clothing.
Combining the discolored shadowed faces of these individuals with their ruined clothing, Magnasco portrays the Italians living in a state of agony. Proving that Italians lived in poor living conditions, wealthy gentlemen on the Grand Tour visited the remains of the Roman Empire and reported that Italian lived in a state of poverty and provincialism (Dickie, Delizia!: The Epic History of the Italians and Their Food). While the sailor is highlighted by the sun's beam of light over the horizon, the afflicted individuals are juxtaposed with the calm sailor. The difference between the untroubled sailor and the aching Italians proves that similar to the magpie, the sailor represents the ability to lift these hurting individuals out of its ruins from the Roman Empire and into a state of prosperity that will be influenced by the innovations of the Enlightenment.
One of the many Italians on the floor of the port is a man who is the center of the painting and extends his long half clothed body to introduce the relationship between the light brightening the agonized Italians and the intelligent magpie's symbol. Looking towards the magpie with faces of despair, the large group of Italians appear to be tired, yet they are not hiding from the light that is shining on them. While the centered man seems to have a light source shining on him, the other citizens on the port are also illuminated with light. However, the light that is shining onto these humans is not the same source of light that is behind the magpie.
This source of light appears to be coming into the painting from the direction the magpie sings in, which presents the Italians as individuals who desire to receive the intelligence and advancements the magpie will provide to them through enlightened ideas. Portraying the Italians as exhausted individuals declares a relationship that exists between the Italians and the magpie's symbol of bringing a state of well-being into Italy. Rather than hiding from the light that is cast onto them, the Italians long to receive the enlightened ideas the magpie will implement into Italy to undergo a transformation from a ruined country to an advanced nation in Europe.
Towering over the Italians on the port's floor is a column containing a broken arch with an abundance of greenery that supports the message that the Italians are suffering amongst their ruins. While the column is tall, the paint on the column appears to have chipped away over the last few years. This implies that the column is a remain of the Roman Empire, which signifies that the Italians are living amongst the ruins of their glorious past. Connected to the column are two arches that branch out in different directions.
However, the arch on the left side of the column is broken. While the broken arch contributes to the ruins of the Roman Empire, it connects to Italy's brokenness that resulted from corrupt aristocrats manipulating politics and economics in their favor; this led to Italy's inability to progress by adopting the ideas of the Enlightenment. On both arches, mossy greenery is growing out of the rock that makes up the arch. The plants that are growing out of the arch are lithophytes, which grow in or on bare rocks but contain dead tissue (World of Flowering.com). Therefore, the greenery does not represent growth, but it is associated with decay.
Magnasco incorporates lithophytes on the arches to emphasize that while the Italians are living amongst its ruins, Italy has decayed instead of having grown out of ruination. Combining the Roman Empire's broken arch and the decaying lithophytes, Magnasco conveys the idea that Italians are suffering by living in a state of desolation alongside their ruins.
If Italy incorporated the technological advancements, social ideas, and lifestyles associated with the Enlightenment movement occurring in other European countries, the empire of Enlightenment would be able to improve Italy. The tiresome Italians, old column, and broken arch enforce the notion that Italy is facing a period of suffering.
However, illuminating the singing magpie and sailor to illustrate a symbol of prosperity that will be brought to Italy creates a connection between light and intelligence for the future of Italy to rise above its ruins of the Roman Empire. The idea of the Italians being able to grow out of a state of agony and develop into an eminent European country through the help of a magpie to become as prosperous as other European nations is one that exceeds comprehension; in other words, this idea Magnasco conveys in the painting is sublime, but the painting itself is not.
Cite this page
Rococo Art Movement. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Social Theologies
Traditional, political, and social theologies and ideals began to change during the Enlightenment movement. Men had always been the dominant race due to being educated, and being job working class citizens. Women were expected to take care of household responsibilities, child bear and finally be a mother. There were few women who were given the chance to be educated before the Enlightenment era. That all changed once feminism took off in the 18th century as well as individualism. The questions raised by Enlightenment thinkers about human powers and limitations have left a legacy so lasting that it is hard to imagine our world without the Enlightenment. (Puchner 5) During the 18th century, individualism, and feminism became popular, women took these ideals and ran with them all the way through the Enlightenment period.
Individualism and rationality began to catch fire during the Enlightenment era. Women became tired of being unequal to men and started to challenge traditional ideals that had been upheld for centuries. Many male thinkers during the Enlightenment period viewed women in a completely different manner, one of these influential people was Roussuau. Take for example Mary Wollstonecraft, she wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Men in 1791, women read it and started to support her ideals such as equality in education. It seems to me that her confidence level boosted and almost became a sign of arrogance.
In 1792, she wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Wollstonecraft argued that marriage was equal to prostitution and the right to be educated was unequal, that led to harsh conditions for women in the 18th century. (Puchner 45) I have to say I agree on the part of education with her. Women deserved the right to get an education. I do not however agree with her statement when she said that marriage is like prostitution. I believe marriage is a relationship between two people of the opposite gender that love each other. Prostitution is very degrading to society. This was one of the first times where women started to stand up for themselves.
Revolution during the Enlightenment period gave women courage to stand up for themselves. Before the Enlightenment period, women's roles were subject to submitting to their husbands, cleaning the house, prepping and cooking meals, and child bearing into motherhood. Women during the Enlightenment still took on these tasks, but also fought for their right to have a voice in society. Their voice was heard through women earning the right to be educated, have a voice in politics, and even writing literature. Women came together and formed Salons which were considered a safe place to discuss politics, literature, and science. During the 18th century women began to expand their horizon, regarding issues they were being discriminated against. Women began to use and inject their voices into society like they never had before.
I think in today's society women don't have to justify themselves as much as they did before and during the Enlightenment. I believe there are certain jobs meant for certain genders and vice versa. The perception has definitely changed from the 18th century to present day. Ideals have differed from then as well as now you see women being the hard job working citizens. Now in today's society, sometimes men in the relationship will be a stay at home dad, doing the things women were told they had to do in the Enlightenment era. Some people in today's society still believe in the traditional ideals that women should take care of the house while men are out in the workplace. Although, women have come a long way since the 18th century, women still have a long journey ahead.
In conclusion, the Enlightenment era was a time of great change. Modifications in science and women's rights were made to give women more rights besides taking care of children and household duties. Women were given more opportunities through civil rights such as, education and responsibility. Although women came a long way during the Enlightenment, authors like Wollstonecraft had only laid down the foundation for what would happen in the future.
Cite this page
Social Theologies. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/
Enlightenment Era
Enlightenment era was when people started to use reason, or logical thinking, rationalism, and science to attack this power. The thinkers of the Enlightenment objected to the absolute power of the royal rulers and of the Roman Catholic church. Many enlightenment ideas deals with human freedom and individual rights. This article talks about the enlightenment era and thinkers who in some way had influenced racism. To say that race and racism are the results of the Enlightenment is unfair at humans did hold slaves or otherwise classified each other prior to the 18th century. People argue that the scientific thought of the Enlightenment created the racial taxonomy and the color-coded, white-over-black ideology with which we are familiar in today.
Even Immanuel Kant a German philosopher who is a central figure in modern philosophy believed that humankind exists in the greatest perfection of whites with great talents while Indians or brown skinned are in the middle. Kant stated that Negroes are the lowest in rank and the peasant in part of the American peoples. John Locke the most popular enlightenment thinker who influenced many nations with his inalienable rights thought also, had a influence of early modern racial thinking because in the second of the treatises, Locke provides a justification for slavery as a result of war, using the same absolute power language that grants slave owners the power of life and death over their slaves. Articles talks about more people knowingly or unknowingly spread the idea of racism during the enlightenment era. Even though enlightenment helped shaped our modern world in science, government and many more, it also shaped the Enlightenment ideas of race and white supremacy today.
The article The Enlightenment's Dark Side is related to the enlightenment period we discussed in class. Enlightenment era where people started to believe in science and reasoning and rebel again absolute monarchs. We also analyzed some enlightenment thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire and many more. John Locke commonly known for his natural laws when he speaks about monarchs aren't chosen by God. Consent of the governed for the protection of natural rights which are life, liberty, and property. Where Rousseau is saying the government is a contract between rulers and people meaning a social contract. Voltaire famous for his wit attacks the church and demanded freedom of speech and religion.
Montesquieu which influenced our three branches of government talks about separation of power. Thomas Hobbes in other hand believed something different then most of the others, he believed that the correct form of government was the absolute monarchy. There were many other enlightenment thinkers who discussed crime, women's rights, and economic progression. The article discussed about the whole enlightenment era and some thinkers like Locke and Kant (philosopher) which we have taken a test on. The connection between the article and the enlightenment is significant because the articles reveal about some words that the thinker like Locke said which we never have thought in depth about and it gives more information about enlightenment.
The article also relates to one of the five themes of modern world history by talking about scientific breakthroughs which impacted the people during the beginning of the 18th century. Their lifestyle changed after they began to go more into logical thinking and science with observations. Most people after realizing the science significance stopped going to church and church started to lose power. This scientific breakthrough spread into other places of the world like America where we used ideas of enlightenment thinker to form our modern government and constitution.
The society in whole started to use observations and asking questions about dive rights and monarchs having power. Where the enlightenment thinkers started persuading more people to follow their ideas. It's shocking to know how enlightenment is used today in influenced the idea of racism. It's unbelievable because a person like John Locke who Thomas Jefferson was inspired by to write the Declaration of Independence felt that slaves had no rights over their life. Its very hard to believe because I love learning of enlightenment as it helped America shape our government and laws. I believe that it was unintentionally said by Locke and Kant about the Native/African Americans.
Cite this page
Enlightenment Era. (2019, Nov 28).
Retrieved November 2, 2025 , from
https://studydriver.com/2019/11/